28
Theory & methods lesson 3 Can Sociology be objective/ value free?

Theory & methods lesson 3

  • Upload
    etta

  • View
    49

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Can Sociology be objective/ value free? . Theory & methods lesson 3. Starter. Think of 3 topics you would like to research Choose one of the topics and write down 3 questions that you would ask in either an interview or a questionnaire. Swap with your neighbour. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Theory & methods lesson 3

Theory & methods lesson 3

Can Sociology be objective/ value free?

Page 2: Theory & methods lesson 3

Starter

Think of 3 topics you would like to research

Choose one of the topics and write down 3 questions that you would ask in either an interview or a questionnaire.

Swap with your neighbour. From reading your neighbour’s

questions, is it possible to identify their opinion about the topic? Why?

Page 3: Theory & methods lesson 3

Key issues

1. Is an objective, value-free sociology possible?

2. Is it desirable?

Page 4: Theory & methods lesson 3

Objectivity

What does it mean?

The exclusion of values from research.

Page 5: Theory & methods lesson 3

Key issues

1. Is an objective, value-free sociology possible?

2. Is it desirable?

Page 6: Theory & methods lesson 3

Position 1

If sociology wants to make any claim to scientific status then it has to be free of personal and political biases.

This is known as value-freedom or objectivity.

Who might take this position?

Page 7: Theory & methods lesson 3

Position 2

A second position is that, ideally, our personal values should not intrude into our sociological studies, but in practice, it is almost impossible to keep them out.

This position sees society as value laden.

Who might take this position?

Page 8: Theory & methods lesson 3

Position 3

At the other extreme from value freedom are those who argue that anyone involved in doing sociological research should want to make things better for people in society (especially the oppressed).

Sociology should therefore be used as a tool that helps bring about social change

Committed sociology

Page 9: Theory & methods lesson 3

Positions!?!

3 volunteers please!!!

Page 10: Theory & methods lesson 3

The early positivists

Comte (1798-1857), Durkheim (1858-1917)

(see sociology factsheet)

The creation of a better society was not a matter of subjective values or personal opinions.

Sociology’s job was to discover the truth about how society works & uncover the laws that make it work properly.

Page 11: Theory & methods lesson 3

So...

By discovering the ‘truth’ about how society worked, sociologists would be able to say objectively and with scientific certainty what was best for society.

Page 12: Theory & methods lesson 3

Was Marx a positivist?

Discuss these 3 questions on your table;

What was Marx trying to achieve?

What was his method?

Was he a positivist?

Page 13: Theory & methods lesson 3

Marx & Durkheim

Marx & Durkheim both believed that scientific methods could produce data that would tell us what values we should hold.

E.g. Research might establish the fact that divorcees are more likely to commit suicide. This tells us that we should make divorce harder to obtain.

What is wrong with this reasoning?

Page 14: Theory & methods lesson 3

Max WeberIn Weber’s view a value can be neither

proved nor disproved by the facts: they belong to different realms.

Weber saw an essential role for values in sociological research.

We can divide his views into 4 stages of the research process. Take a sheet of paper and fold it into

quarters Write ‘Weber’ in the middle

Page 15: Theory & methods lesson 3

1. Values as a guide to research We cannot study the whole society We have to select certain facts and

study these How do we choose facts to study? We can only select them in terms of

what we regard as important based on our own values.

E.g. Feminists value gender equality and therefore study women’s oppression

Page 16: Theory & methods lesson 3

2. Data collection and hypothesis testing Whilst values are essential in

choosing what to study, Weber argued that we must be as objective and unbiased as possible when collecting the data.

We should not ask leading questions. Revisit the questions you wrote at

the beginning of the lesson – are they leading? Did they reflect your own values?

Page 17: Theory & methods lesson 3

3. Values in the interpretation of data The facts need to be set in a theoretical

framework so that we can understand their significance and draw conclusions from the,.

Our choice of theoretical framework is influenced by our values.

Therefore, we must be explicit about them, spelling out our values so that others can see if unconscious bias is present in our interpretation.

Page 18: Theory & methods lesson 3

4. Values and the sociologist as citizen Research findings often have very real

effects on people’s lives, but sociologists sometimes ignore the uses to which their research is put.

Weber argues that scientists and sociologists are also human beings and citizens and they must not dodge the moral and political issues their work raises.

They must take moral responsibility for the harm their work may do.

Page 19: Theory & methods lesson 3

Moral responsibiility?

Einstein’s theories in physics helped make the atomic bomb possible.

Einstein voiced his opposition to nuclear weapons.

Read through box 4.4 p 273 Webb

How much do you agree with the following statement;‘Social scientists have a moral responsibility for

their work’

What do you think???Volunteers please – Where do you stand,

continuum line

Page 20: Theory & methods lesson 3

Listen....

Do not write anything down yet Really listen and read the following 5

slides!!!! Ask any questions you need to make

sure you understand

Page 21: Theory & methods lesson 3

Value freedom and commitment Neo-Marxists, interactionists and

feminists have argued for a ‘committed sociology’ in which the sociologist spells out the importance of their personal values to their research.

Page 22: Theory & methods lesson 3

Modern positivists Modern positivists argued that their

own values were irrelevant to their research for 2 reasons:

1. The desire to appear scientific Job is simply to establish the truth about

people’s behaviour, not to judge it.

2. The social position of society Sociologists as hired hands

Page 23: Theory & methods lesson 3

Committed sociology Myrdal (1969) argues that sociologists

should not only spell out their values, they should also openly ‘take sides’.

Committed sociologists – it is neither possible nor desirable to keep values out of research. Impossible because sociologist’s values are

bound to be reflected in their work Undesirable since without values to guide

research sociologists are putting their services at the disposal of the highest bidder.

Page 24: Theory & methods lesson 3

Becker (1970)– ‘whose side are we on’ Traditionally the powerful Should be the underdogs – give the

less powerful a voiceBecker = interactionalistWhat method does he favour, why?

Page 25: Theory & methods lesson 3

Gouldner

Gouldner criticises Becker – romantic and sentimental

and 20th century positivist for being subservient (submissive/controlled) to their paymasters

He argues that all research is inevitably influenced by values (personal/money)

Page 27: Theory & methods lesson 3

Website activities!

www.sociology.uk.net

Typical exam question on this topic –

Assess the view that values can and should be kept out of sociological research.

33 marks (45 minutes) p275 Webb

Page 28: Theory & methods lesson 3

Plenary task

Write down on your exit card 3 questions relating to this theoretical topic. We will use them in a quiz in our next theory lesson!Homework reminder!!!Extended writing 1000 words, is sociology a science due FRIDAY-

Tomorrow!!!!