46
Theories & Philosophies Just the tip of the iceberg EDER 671 Dr. Qing Li

Theories & Philosophies

  • Upload
    dolan

  • View
    43

  • Download
    5

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Theories & Philosophies. Just the tip of the iceberg EDER 671 Dr. Qing Li. Learning Theories. What is a theory? A theory provides a general explanation for observations made over time, Explains and predicts behavior, Can never be established beyond all doubt May be modified - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Theories  & Philosophies

Theories & Philosophies

Just the tip of the iceberg

EDER 671

Dr. Qing Li

Page 2: Theories  & Philosophies

2

Learning Theories

What is a theory? A theory provides a general explanation for observations made over

time, Explains and predicts behavior, Can never be established beyond all doubt May be modified Seldom has to be thrown out completely if thoroughly

tested but sometimes a theory may be widely accepted for a long time and later disproved.

(Dorin, Demmin & Gabel, 1990)

Page 3: Theories  & Philosophies

3

Brief overview of some learning theories

based on OCSLD (2002)

There are many different theories of learning. It is useful to consider their application to how your students learn and how you teach. It is important to think how you learn and realize that everyone does not learn the way you do.

Page 4: Theories  & Philosophies

4

Sensory Stimulation theory

Its premise is that effective learning occurs when the senses are stimulated.

75% knowledge held by adults is learned through seeing, 13% through hearing. Other senses- touch, smell & taste account for 12%.

By stimulating the senses, particularly the visual sense, learning can be enhanced.

If multi-senses are stimulated, greater learning takes place. How: through greater variety of colors, volume levels,

strong statements, facts presented visually, use of variety of techniques and media.

Page 5: Theories  & Philosophies

5

Reinforcement Theory

Skinner: positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement, punishment. (details later)

Note: much ‘competency based training’ is based on this theory.

Very useful in learning repetitive tasks, but higher order learning is not involved.

Criticism – too rigid and mechanical.

Page 6: Theories  & Philosophies

6

Holistic learning theory

Premise: the individual personality consists of many elements… specifically… the intellect, emotions, the body impulse (or desire), intuition and imagination that all require activation if learning is to be more effective

Page 7: Theories  & Philosophies

7

Facilitation theory (the humanist approach) Carl Rogers, Premise: learning will occur by the

educator acting as a facilitator, by establishing an atmosphere in which learners feel comfortable to consider new ideas and are not threatened by external factors.

Believe that human beings have a natural eagerness to learn;

There is some resistance to, and unpleasant consequences of, giving up what is currently held to be true;

The most significant learning involves changing one’s concept of oneself.

Page 8: Theories  & Philosophies

8

Facilitation theory (2)

Teachers are: Less protective of their constructs and beliefs

than other teachers, More able to listen to learners, especially to their

feelings, pay as much attention to their relationship with

learners as to the content of the course Apt to accept feedback, both positive and

negative and to use it as constructive insight into themselves and their behavior.

Page 9: Theories  & Philosophies

9

Facilitation theory (3)

Learners Are encouraged to take responsibility for their

own learning Provide much of the input for the learning which

occurs through their insights and experiences Are encouraged to consider that the most

valuable evaluation is self-evaluation and that learning needs to focus on factors that contribute to solving significant problems or achieving significant results.

Page 10: Theories  & Philosophies

10

Experiential learning

Kolb’s 4-stage learning process

•The process can begin at any of the stages and is continuous (no limit to the # of cycles).

•Without reflection we would simply continue to repeat our mistakes.

Have an experience

Plan next steps, experimenting to find solution

Review that experience

Conclude from that experience

Page 11: Theories  & Philosophies

11

Experiential learning (2) Learning is through 1) concrete experience,2)

observation & reflection, 3) abstract conceptualization, 4) active experimentation.

People begin with their preferred style in the experiential learning cycle. Hence 4 learning styles: activist (prefer to learn by doing), reflector ( like to observe & reflect), theorist (like to have everything organized into a neat schema ASAP), pragmatist (enjoys the planning stage and keen to test things out in practice)

Don’t know your learning style? http://www.stepchange.org.uk/Learning_Style_Question.pdf

Page 12: Theories  & Philosophies

12

Action Learning

Links the world of learning with the world of action through a reflective process within collaborative learning groups- “action learning sets”. The “sets” meet regularly to work on individuals’ real life issues with the aim of learning with and from each other.

Page 13: Theories  & Philosophies

13

Adult Learning (Andragogy)

Knowles: adult learning was special. adults:

Bring wealth experience to the learning environment – should be used as a resource.

expect to have a high degree of influence on what they are to be educated for, and how they are to be educated.

Andragogy is: student-centered, experience-based, problem-oriented and collaborative very much in the spirit of the humanist approach to learning and education.

Page 14: Theories  & Philosophies

14

Why bother?

Some reasons: Learning theories permeate to all dimensions of

educational technology. E.g. depending on the learners and situations, we design our instructional events (environments, systems, software) which would affect student learning.

In ID, the designer must understand the strengths and weaknesses of each learning theory to optimize their use in appropriate instructional design strategy.

Page 15: Theories  & Philosophies

15

Your reason?

Can you think of at least one good reason for us to learn all these theories?

Can you use examples from your previous experience to explain your reasons?

Page 16: Theories  & Philosophies

Objectivism vs. Constructivism

Based on Wilson (1997) & Roblyer (2003)

Page 17: Theories  & Philosophies

17

Current educational Goals and Methods: Two views

Directed instruction: grounded primarily in behaviorism and the information-processing branch of cognitive learning theories (acquisition metaphor).

Constructivist instruction evolved from other branches of thinking in cognitive learning theory (participation metaphor).

Page 18: Theories  & Philosophies

18

Philosophical foundations Objectivist: knowledge has a separate, real

existence of its own outside the human mind. Learning happens when this knowledge is transmitted to people and they store it in their minds.

Constructivist: humans construct all knowledge in their minds by participating in certain experiences; learning occurs when one constructs both mechanisms for learning and her own unique version of the knowledge, colored by background, experiences, and aptitudes.

A tree was falling off in the middle of a forest in BC and no body was around. Since nobody heard, did the falling tree make a noise?

Page 19: Theories  & Philosophies

19

Methodological differences

Directed Teacher: transmitter of

knowledge; expert source; director of skill/concept development through structured experiences

Student: receive information; demonstrate competence; all students learn same material

Curriculum: based on skill and knowledge hierarchies; skills taught one after the other in set sequence.

Constructivist Teacher: guide and facilitator

as students construct their own knowledge; collaborative resource and assistant as students explore topics.

Student: collaborate with other; develop competence; students may learn different material

Curriculum: based on projects/problems, etc. that foster both higher and lower level skills concurrently.

Page 20: Theories  & Philosophies

20

More methodological differences Directed

Learning goals: stated in terms of mastery learning and behavioral competence in a scope and sequence

Activities: lecture, demonstration, discussions, drill practice, seatwork, testing

Assessment: written tests and development of products matched to objectives; all tests and products match set criteria; same measures for all students.

Constructivist

Learning goals: stated in terms of growth and increased ability to work independently and collaboratively.

Activities: group projects, hands-on exploration, authentic tasks, product development

Assessment: alternative assessment including performance assessment, portfolios; quality measured by rubrics and checklists; measures may differ among students.

Page 21: Theories  & Philosophies

21

Theoretical Foundations: Directed

Behavioral theories: concentrate on immediately observable, thus, behavioral, changes in performance (tests) as indicators of learning. Pavlov: ‘conditioned response’, behavior is largely

controlled by involuntary physical responses to outside stimuli (e.g. dogs salivating at the sight of dog food).

Page 22: Theories  & Philosophies

22

Behaviorist (Skinner, ‘stimulus-response’ ) behavior is more controlled by the consequences of

actions than by events preceding the action. A consequence is an outcome (stimulus) after the behavior influence future behaviors. (e.g. a child reasons she will get praise if she behaves well in school).

Since internal learning processes cannot be seen directly, the focus is on cause-and –effect relationships that can be established by observation.

Human behavior can be shaped by ‘contingencies of reinforcement”: positive reinforcement – increase in desired behavior

from a stimulus (study hard- praise) Negative reinforcement -increase in desired behavior

from avoiding or removing a stimulus (not finish assignment – detention).

Punishment – decrease in undesirable behaviorundesirable behavior from undesirable consequences. (cheating– failure)

Page 23: Theories  & Philosophies

23

Theoretical Foundations: Directed (cont.)

Information Processing Theories: behaviorisms focus only on external directly observable indicators of learning, information-processing theory (first and most influential of the cognitive-learning theories) try to visualize what is impossible to observe directly.

Human brain has 3 kinds of memories: sensory registers--memory that receives all the information a

person senses (1 second) Short-term (working) memory (5-20 seconds) Long-term memory (indefinitely).

Page 24: Theories  & Philosophies

24

Theoretical Foundations: Directed (cont.)

Information-Processing Theory: Model of human memory system

Sensory RegisterInput

(through eyes, mouth, etc.)

Working (short term) memory

Long term memory

attention

Lost

Rehearsal

Meaningful learning

Organizing

Elaborating

Imagery

Lost

May lost if not using regularly

Page 25: Theories  & Philosophies

25

More directed: Gagne’s Principles Build on behaviorism and information-processing theories,

Gagne translated principles from learning theories into practical instructional strategies.

Events of instruction (9): to arrange optimal ‘conditions of learning’.

1. Gaining attention2. Informing the learner of the objective3. Stimulating recall of prerequisite learning4. Presenting new material5. Providing learning guidance6. Eliciting performance7. Formative assessment8. Summative assessment9. Enhancing retention and recall

Page 26: Theories  & Philosophies

26

More Gagne Types of learning: he identified types of learning as behaviors

students demonstrate after acquiring knowledge. They differ according to the conditions necessary to foster them. He showed how the Events of Instruction would be carried out slightly different from one type of learning to another:

1. Intellectual skills Problem solving Higher order rules Defined concepts Concrete concepts discriminations

2. Cognitive strategies3. Verbal information4. Motor skills5. attitudes

Page 27: Theories  & Philosophies

27

One more Gagne

Learning hierarchies: the development of ‘intellectual skills requires learning that amounts to a building process. Lower level skills provide a necessary foundation for higher level ones. E.g. to learn long division, students first have to learn all prerequisite skills including number recognition, addition and subtraction, etc.

Gagne’s work has been widely used to develop systematic instructional design principles (major influence in business, industry, and military training).

Page 28: Theories  & Philosophies

28

Your task:

Working in groups of 3, try to develop a metaphor with a graphic presentation that shows your understanding of major characteristics of theories and philosophies behind “directed instruction”. Prepare a 2 min. presentation.

Page 29: Theories  & Philosophies

29

Constructivism

The differences among those who think of themselves as constructivists makes it difficult to settle on a single definition.

Theorists like Dewey, Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bruner are credited with fundamental premises of constructivism.

Page 30: Theories  & Philosophies

30

Social constructivism

Dewey: curriculum should arise from student interests Curriculum topics should be integrated, not

isolated. Education is growth, rather than an end in itself. Learning occurs through its connection with life,

rather than through participation in curriculum. Learning should be hands on and experience

based, rather than abstract.

Page 31: Theories  & Philosophies

31

Social constructivism (cont.)

Vygotsky: Cognitive development is directly related to and

based on social development. Zone of proximal development: difference

between two levels of cognitive functioning (adult/expert and child/novice).

Scaffolding: the assistance that an expert gives a novice to help him/her reach higher than would be possible by the novice’s efforts alone.

Page 32: Theories  & Philosophies

32

Piaget: Cognitive development

Child’s 4 stages of cognitive development:1. Sensorimoter (birth-2 yrs.) –explore world through senses

and motor activity. Cannot differentiate between self and environment (if they cannot see, it doesn’t exist)

2. Preoperational: (2-7) – develop greater abilities to communicate via speech and to engage in symbolic activities (drawing object, play pretending and imaging).

3. Concrete operational (7-11) – increase in abstract reasoning ability and ability to generalize.

4. Formal operations (12-15) – can form and test hypotheses, organize information, reason scientifically, show results of abstract thinking in the form of symbolic materials.

Page 33: Theories  & Philosophies

33

Piaget (cont.)

Piaget’s basic assumptions:1. Children are active and motivated learners2. Children’s knowledge of the world becomes more integrated

and organized over time3. Children learn through the processes of assimilation and

accommodation4. Cognitive development depends on interaction with one’s

physical and social environment5. The processes of equilibration (resolving disequilibrium) help to

develop increasingly complex levels of thought6. Cognitive development can occur only after certain genetically

controlled neurological changes occur. 7. Cognitive development occurs in four qualitatively different

stages.

Page 34: Theories  & Philosophies

34

Bruner: Learning as discovery Bruner also categorized children’s cognitive development stage:

Enactive stage (0-3) Iconic stage (3-8) Symbolic stage (8-)

Discovery learning: an approach to instruction through which students interact with their environment – by exploring and manipulating objects, wrestling with questions and controversies, or performing experiments.

However, teachers found that discovery learning is most successful when student have prerequisite knowledge and undergo some structured experiences.

Page 35: Theories  & Philosophies

35

Gardner: Multiple intelligences

Of all theories embraced by constructivists, Gardner is the only one that attempt to define the role of intelligence in learning.

Types of intelligence:Linguistic; Musical; Logical-mathematical;

Spatial; Bodily-kinesthetic; Intrapersonal; Interpersonal; Naturalist.

Educational implication: teachers need to try to determine which types of intelligence each student has and direct the student to learning activities that capitalize on these innate abilities.

Page 36: Theories  & Philosophies

36

Constructivism (claims)

1. Constructivism is more a philosophy (i.e. way of seeing the world), not a set of strategies.

The nature of reality– mental representations have ‘real’ ontological status just as the “world out there” does. Or, reality is more in the mind of the knower, the knower constructs (interprets) a reality based upon his/her apperceptions.

The nature of knowledge – it is individually constructed; it’s inside people’s minds, not “out there”.

Page 37: Theories  & Philosophies

37

Constructivism (cont.)

Human interaction– we rely on shared or “negotiated” meanings, better thought of as cooperative than authoritative or manipulative in nature.

The nature of science-it is a meaning making activity with the biases and filters accompanying any human activity.

Page 38: Theories  & Philosophies

38

Philosophy or Rules?

If we see the world in constructivist terms, we go about our jobs in a different way. But this difference cannot be reduced to a discrete set of rules or techniques.

Too often, constructivism is equated with low structure and permissiveness-imposing predefined learning goals or a learning method is somehow interfering with students’ construction of meaning. This maybe true in extreme cases.

Page 39: Theories  & Philosophies

39

One example Scott, a teacher, who holds definitely constructivistic and

anti-authoritarian philosophy wrote in journal: “Third hour composition I went to a seating chart, the first time I’ve done that here. I caught them as they came in and told them where to sit. Great improvement! Everyone working hard on their papers…I sense that students are relieved that I’ve imposed more structure”. Imposing a seating chart is a clear act of asserting authoritative control and imposing structure. Is Scott betraying his principles, or can an ostensibly “objectivist” instructional technique actually serve his constructivist learning and teaching goals? The students’ answer clearly indicate that they view it as supporting their own learning goals.

Page 40: Theories  & Philosophies

40

Creativity vs. Discipline Yet to help students become creative, some kind of

discipline and structure must be provided. “Creativity arises out of the tension between

spontaneity and limitations, the latter (like river banks) forcing the spontaneity into the various forms which are essential to the work of art… The significance of limits in art is seen most clearly when we consider the question of form. Form provides the essential boundaries and structure for the creative act” (Laurel, 1991, p.101).

The point is that a given instructional strategy takes on meaning as it is used, in a particular context.

Page 41: Theories  & Philosophies

41

Holistic way of observing

Hence, instructional strategies that impose structures may actually help students’ knowledge construction.

One instructional strategy cannot tell whether it hinders or serves constructivist learning goals, rather the entire situation needs to be examined to make the judgments.

Page 42: Theories  & Philosophies

42

Constructivism (more claims)

2. You do not have to be a philosopher to take a position.

3. Basically, nobody admits to be an objectivism.

Objectivism is primarily a pejorative label given by constructivists to the offending others.

Realists (other name) believe there is a “reality” exists, and the quality of mental representations can be judged by their correspondence to the reality (another hotly debated issue).

Page 43: Theories  & Philosophies

43

What is your take on?

There are many different interpretations of constructivism. An example: a Florida politician's position on a county option to permit the sale of liquor:

“if by whiskey, you mean the water of life that cheers men’s souls, that smoothes out the tensions of the day, that gives gentle perspective to one’s view of life, then put my name on the list of the fervent wets.

If by whiskey, you mean the devil’s brew that rends families, destroys careers and ruins one’s ability to work, then count me in the ranks of the dries.”

Page 44: Theories  & Philosophies

44

Constructivism (still more claims…would it end? :)

Neither side is right. Mind is not a box that inside the box are reflections of what lies outside.

The starting point is recognizing that we simply are in the world, working, acting and doing things. Hence individual cognition is dethroned as the center of the universe and placed back into the context of being par of the world.

Page 45: Theories  & Philosophies

45

Debate

Prepare a debate on the benefits of using directed vs. constructivist models for teaching and learning.

Each group should gather evidence to support arguments on one of the following aspects of one of the models: real, practice problems they address; the soundness of their underlying theories; the usefulness in preparing students for future education and work. (6 groups total).

Conduct the debate in class.

Page 46: Theories  & Philosophies

46

Bibliography Dorin, H., Demmin, P., Gabel, D. (1990). Chemistry: The study of

matter. (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, Inc. OCSLD: The oxford centre for Staff and Learning Development.

http://www.brookes.ac.uk/services/ocsd/2_learntch/theories.html [09/18/2003]

Roblyer, M., & Edwards, J. (2000). Integrating educational technology into teaching (2 ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

Wilson, B. (1997). Reflections on constructivism and instructional design. In C. Dills & A. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publish. http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~bwilson/construct.html [09/18/2003]