2
UNHCR Iligan Hub I Crystal Inn, Gagara St., Brgy. San Miguel, Ma. Christina Subdivision I +63 (63) 224 6567 I [email protected] I www.unhcr.org/ph DISCLAIMER The Thematic Protection Bulletin aims to provide a starting point for information and analysis that can help protection agencies, policy makers and other stakeholders concerning instances of forced displacement or solutions (repatriation, resettle- ment, integration). The number of people displaced / affected may differ from the number in need of humanitarian assistance. To the extent possible, the terminology used in the Bulletin reflects the UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement and other sources of international law and practice. The information reported in the Thematic Protection Bulletin has been received from members of the Protection Cluster across Mindanao. Consequently, unreported cases of forced displacement and solutions are not reflected. Updates will be provided as and when more information is received from members. Although efforts are made to verify the data, the UNHCR Mindanao, Philippines takes no responsibility for the incompleteness or inaccura- cy of the information. The information provided in this Thematic Protection Bulletin does not necessarily reflect the views of UNHCR or any individual member of the Protection Cluster. Photos featuring children were taken with their consent. In several locaons, the existence of “community-based evacuaon centers” (CB-ECs) have been observed. The Iligan City Social Welfare and Development Office (CSWDO) stated that the 13 spontaneous selements within the city could not be officially recognized due to constraints in resources to address the humanitarian need at the city level. In addion, concerns over pro-ISIS militant members have infiltrang IDP camps, posing as displaced civilians have led to a priorizaon of security. In Pantar, although the local government recognized the seven (7) spontaneous BACKGROUND The armed confrontaon between the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and Pro-ISIS militants in Marawi City has forcibly displaced 98 percent of the total populaon of the city, as well as residents from nearby municipalies, who were compelled to leave due to severe food shortage and/or constricon of local economies. A vast majority of the displaced populaon have sought shelter with their relaves, instead of going to evacuaon centers. The strong sense of honor – or “maratabat” – of the Meranaw, which is the predominant ethnic group in Marawi City, is key to this phenomenon. In response, local governments of host communies such as Iligan City immediately opened evacuaon centers in several locaons to cater to the humanitarian needs of the displaced populaon. Also, government established the Regional Command and Coordinaon Center (RCCC) was transformed into the Naonal Emergency Operaons Center (NEOC) upon the acvaon of the Naonal Incident Command System (NCIS) aſter the first week of June. At the early stages, members of the protecon cluster reported that some IDPs have set up spontaneous collecve centers outside of the officially opened evacuaon centers. Spontaneous collecve centers are exisng structures that are used as temporary living accommodaons for hosng displaced populaons. UNHCR verified 24 of these sites and presented the IDPs’ concerns to government counterparts. While congeson is the common protecon issue faced by IDPs in evacuaon centers officially opened by local government units, home-based IDPs face the issue of access and assistance. IDPs in spontaneous collecve centers have neither camp managers to whom they could refer their concerns, nor host families who can support their needs while displaced. Informaon disseminaon is an underlying issue cung across all areas of humanitarian response; IDPs who lack informaon on the registraon procedure and pathways to available services are unable to access assistance. BULLETIN Closing the gaps 31 July 2017 │ Issue No. 1 Strengthening community-based capacities in response to the Marawi Humanitarian Crisis THEMATIC PROTECTION CLOSING THE GAPS collecve centers therein, these are not on the list of the naonal government yet. Spontaneous collecve centers have also been verified in Kauswagan (4), Balo-i (1), and Sultan Naga Dimaporo (5). These are not yet on the list of evacuaon centers of both local and naonal governments and IDPs therein and are treated as home- based. The naonal government, through the DSWD and the ARMM responded to this occurrence by iniang registraon acvies in spontaneous collecve centers and provision of assistance. IN FOCUS: COMMUNITY-BASED EVACUATION CENTERS For its part, the Protecon Cluster idenfied IDPs in self-seled sites as an added sub- category under “IDPs outside evacuaon centers”, together with home-based IDPs. The IDPs found in spontaneous collecve centers would then be referred to as “community-based evacuaon centers” (CB- ECs). and security concerns. These include risks of evicon and rising tensions between IDPs and host communies and among IDPs themselves. There is access to up-to-date informaon, so that IDPs are kept abreast of what the government is doing for them during their displacement, as well as what government is planning to do on their early recovery and rehabilitaon. Feedback and complaint mechanism is established, which allows IDPs to communicate their requests and grievances in a confidenal manner. A community-based approach is adopted to provide incenves to the host populaon who play a key role in providing support to the IDPs. Humanitarian actors have the responsibility to ensure that: IDPs in “community-based evacuaon centers” (CB-ECs) have equal access to humanitarian assistance and are given the same entlements as IDPs living in evacuaon centers and home-based IDPs. Camp management is in place to look into the humanitarian gaps present in the CB-ECs and address sectoral gaps. If no equivalent personnel will conduct day-to- day management of concerns in these sites, living condions may deteriorate and may trigger disease outbreaks and conflict among IDPs and host communies. Consistent monitoring of the condion of IDPs is in place in order to address safety Wherever possible, assistance is provided to host families and investments are made to enhance community social service that will benefit the host community. This will help alleviate congeson in evacuaon centers. Humanitarian access and assistance for IDPs in the affected municipalies of Lanao del Sur is made available. Consultaon processes, in which IDPs are able to fully parcipate and express their needs and concerns, are iniated prior to implementaon of recovery and rehabilitaon plans, or establishment of transional sites to address cases when return or other durable soluons are not possible in the immediate to medium term. © ABDULA/UNHCR 2017 © ALVARICO/UNHCR 2017

THEMATI PROTE TION ULLETIN Closing the gaps of the total population of the city, as well as residents from nearby municipalities, who were compelled to leave due to severe food shortage

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

UNHCR Iligan Hub I Crystal Inn, Gagara St., Brgy. San Miguel, Ma. Christina Subdivision I +63 (63) 224 6567 I [email protected] I www.unhcr.org/ph

DISCLAIMER The Thematic Protection Bulletin aims to provide a starting point for information and analysis that can help protection agencies, policy makers and other stakeholders concerning instances of forced displacement or solutions (repatriation, resettle-ment, integration). The number of people displaced / affected may differ from the number in need of humanitarian assistance. To the extent possible, the terminology used in the Bulletin reflects the UN Guiding Principles on Internal Displacement and other sources of international law and practice. The information reported in the Thematic Protection Bulletin has been received from members of the Protection Cluster across Mindanao. Consequently, unreported cases of forced displacement and solutions are not reflected. Updates will be provided as and when more information is received from members. Although efforts are made to verify the data, the UNHCR Mindanao, Philippines takes no responsibility for the incompleteness or inaccura-cy of the information. The information provided in this Thematic Protection Bulletin does not necessarily reflect the views of UNHCR or any individual member of the Protection Cluster. Photos featuring children were taken with their consent.

In several locations, the existence of “community-based evacuation centers” (CB-ECs) have been observed.

The Iligan City Social Welfare and Development Office (CSWDO) stated that the 13 spontaneous settlements within the city could not be officially recognized due to constraints in resources to address the humanitarian need at the city level. In addition, concerns over pro-ISIS militant members have infiltrating IDP camps, posing as displaced civilians have led to a prioritization of security.

In Pantar, although the local government recognized the seven (7) spontaneous

BACKGROUND

The armed confrontation between the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and Pro-ISIS militants in Marawi City has forcibly displaced 98 percent of the total population of the city, as well as residents from nearby municipalities, who were compelled to leave due to severe food shortage and/or constriction of local economies.

A vast majority of the displaced population have sought shelter with their relatives, instead of going to evacuation centers. The strong sense of honor – or “maratabat” – of the Meranaw, which is the predominant ethnic group in Marawi City, is key to this phenomenon.

In response, local governments of host communities such as Iligan City immediately opened evacuation centers in several locations to cater to the humanitarian needs of the displaced population. Also, government established the Regional Command and Coordination Center (RCCC) was transformed into the National Emergency Operations Center (NEOC) upon the activation of the National Incident Command System (NCIS) after the first week of June.

At the early stages, members of the protection cluster reported that some IDPs have set up spontaneous collective centers outside of the officially opened evacuation centers. Spontaneous collective centers are existing structures that are used as temporary living accommodations for hosting displaced populations. UNHCR verified 24 of these sites and presented the IDPs’ concerns to government counterparts.

While congestion is the common protection issue faced by IDPs in evacuation centers officially opened by local government units, home-based IDPs face the issue of access and assistance. IDPs in spontaneous collective centers have neither camp managers to whom they could refer their concerns, nor host families who can support their needs while displaced. Information dissemination is an underlying issue cutting across all areas of humanitarian response; IDPs who lack information on the registration procedure and pathways to available services are unable to access assistance.

B U L L E T I N Closing the gaps

3 1 Ju l y 2 0 1 7 │ I s s u e N o . 1

Strengthening community-based capacities in response to the Marawi Humanitarian Crisis

T H E M A T I C P R O T E C T I O N

CLOSING THE GAPS

collective centers therein, these are not on the list of the national government yet.

Spontaneous collective centers have also been verified in Kauswagan (4), Balo-i (1), and Sultan Naga Dimaporo (5). These are not yet on the list of evacuation centers of both local and national governments and IDPs therein and are treated as home-based.

The national government, through the DSWD and the ARMM responded to this occurrence by initiating registration activities in spontaneous collective centers and provision of assistance.

IN FOCUS: COMMUNITY-BASED EVACUATION CENTERS

For its part, the Protection Cluster identified IDPs in self-settled sites as an added sub-category under “IDPs outside evacuation centers”, together with home-based IDPs. The IDPs found in spontaneous collective centers would then be referred to as “community-based evacuation centers” (CB-ECs).

and security concerns. These include risks of eviction and rising tensions between IDPs and host communities and among IDPs themselves.

There is access to up-to-date information, so that IDPs are kept abreast of what the government is doing for them during their displacement, as well as what government is planning to do on their early recovery and rehabilitation.

Feedback and complaint mechanism is established, which allows IDPs to communicate their requests and grievances in a confidential manner.

A community-based approach is adopted to provide incentives to the host population who play a key role in providing support to the IDPs.

Humanitarian actors have the responsibility to ensure that:

IDPs in “community-based evacuation centers” (CB-ECs) have equal access to humanitarian assistance and are given the same entitlements as IDPs living in evacuation centers and home-based IDPs.

Camp management is in place to look into the humanitarian gaps present in the CB-ECs and address sectoral gaps. If no equivalent personnel will conduct day-to-day management of concerns in these sites, living conditions may deteriorate and may trigger disease outbreaks and conflict among IDPs and host communities.

Consistent monitoring of the condition of IDPs is in place in order to address safety

Wherever possible, assistance is provided to host families and investments are made to enhance community social service that will benefit the host community. This will help alleviate congestion in evacuation centers.

Humanitarian access and assistance for IDPs in the affected municipalities of Lanao del Sur is made available.

Consultation processes, in which IDPs are able to fully participate and express their needs and concerns, are initiated prior to implementation of recovery and rehabilitation plans, or establishment of transitional sites to address cases when return or other durable solutions are not possible in the immediate to medium term.

© ABDULA/UNHCR 2017

© ALVARICO/UNHCR 2017

ZAMBOANGADEL SUR

LANAO DELNORTE

MISAMISOCCIDENTAL

LANAODEL SUR

COMMUNITY-BASED EVACUATION CENTERS

Pantar

Balo-i

Kauswagan

Sultan Naga Dimaporo

Iligan City

Marawi City

8Families

Madrasah Harisateel QuranBrgy. Upper Hinaplanon

13Families

MSU IIT Coop SchoolBrgy. Upper Hinaplanon

8Families

Day Care CenterBrgy. Upper Hinaplanon

28Families

Madrasah and SZOPAD BldgBrgy. Upper Hinaplanon

129Families

Moneerah Integrated SchoolBrgy. Ubaldo Laya

214Families

Merila TorilBrgy. Ubaldo Laya

17Families

H. Nasser Garage Purok 10Brgy. Santiago

42Families

Greenhouse BldgBrgy. Tibanga 8

FamiliesMadrasah Harisateel QuranBrgy. Upper Hinaplanon

136Families

Mahad Alnor-al-Islamie, CeanuriBrgy. Tomas Cabili (Tominobo Proper)

38Families

Lomondot CompoundBrgy. Tubod

50Families

Community structures Brgy. Tingin-tingin

27Families

Agricultural Technology InstituteBrgy. Upper Hinaplanon

16Families

Madrasah Abdul RahmanBrgy. Abaga

13Families

PAMANA BuildingBrgy. Poblacion

32Families

West PantarBrgy. West Pantar

33Families

Municipal GymBrgy. Poblacion

4Families

Barangay HallBrgy. Koreo

6Families

Barangay Health StationBrgy. Koreo8

FamiliesBangaan MadrasahBrgy. Bangaan

20Families

Privately owned lotBrgy. Bangaan

24 July 2017 SOURCES: Protection Cluster Mindanao CREATION DATE: FEEDBACK: [email protected] DISCLAIMER: The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations.

Armed Confrontations and Displacement in Marawi (AFP vs Pro-ISIS Militants)PHILIPPINES

ThematicProtectionBulletin

15Families

Amatonding BuildingBrgy. Tubod

52Families

Lanao BuildersBrgy. Tubod

9Families

Day Care CenterBrgy. Kalanganan Lower

7Families

Pindolonan Day Care CenterBrgy. Kalanganan East

COMMUNITY-BASEDEVACUATION CENTERS24