25
The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars Alan Kaylor Cline Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Austin February 9, 2013

The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

  • Upload
    ivana

  • View
    55

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars . Alan Kaylor Cline Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Austin February 9, 2013. The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars and Dean’s Scholars and universities and many other academic programs. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Alan Kaylor ClineDepartment of Computer ScienceThe University of Texas at Austin

February 9, 2013

Page 2: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

and Dean’s Scholars and universities and many other academic programs

Alan Kaylor ClineDepartment of Computer ScienceThe University of Texas at Austin

February 9, 2013

Page 3: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Letter Writing is topical

http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2013/jan/28/application-university-job-reference

Page 4: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

This is not adversarial

Page 5: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

This is not adversarial

• We are on the same team

Page 6: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

This is not adversarial

• We are on the same team

• We all want what is best for the applicant

Page 7: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

This is not adversarial

• We are on the same team

• We all want what is best for the applicant

• At TS we are subject to some constraints

Page 8: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Honesty

Page 9: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Honesty

• That includes The Whole Truth

Page 10: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Honesty

• That includes The Whole Truth

• Threats to honesty

Page 11: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Honesty

• That includes The Whole Truth

• Threats to honesty

– privacy

Page 12: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Honesty

• That includes The Whole Truth

• Threats to honesty

– privacy

– liability

Page 13: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

We try to norm using:

• Current and past student UT records • Records of others from their HS• Records of others recommended by the same

person• …

Page 14: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

We try to norm using:

• Current and past student UT records • Records of others from their HS• Records of others recommended by the same

person• …We try to norm the schools and the letter writers.

Page 15: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

We try to norm using:

• Current and past student UT records • Records of others from their HS• Records of others recommended by the same person• …We try to norm the schools and the letter writers.

Thus, in the long run exaggerating the qualities of an applicant may hurt other applicants later on.

Page 16: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Negative Letter?

Page 17: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Negative Letter?

• The effect of a letter admitting that an applicant was marginal will likely result in the rejection of the applicant.

Page 18: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Negative Letter?

• The effect of a letter admitting that an applicant was marginal will likely result in the rejection of the applicant.

However• By far most applicants are rejected anyway

Page 19: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Negative Letter?

• The effect of a letter admitting that an applicant was marginal will likely result in the rejection of the applicant.

However• By far most applicants are rejected anyway

and

For subsequent letters, your word will be golden.

Page 20: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Can we – Should we – read between the lines?

Page 21: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Can we – Should we – read between the lines?

Paul Grice: we expect people to answer questions with the strongest true and relevant statement.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Grice

Page 22: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Can we – Should we – read between the lines?

Paul Grice: we expect people to answer questions with the strongest true and relevant statement. • “North Carolina State has lost their last two

games”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Grice

Page 23: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

Can we – Should we – read between the lines?

Paul Grice: we expect people to answer questions with the strongest true and relevant statement. • “North Carolina State has lost their last two games” • “John submits his assignments in a timely fashion.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Grice

Page 24: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

I like to see them rank the student as strongly as they can (e.g., top x% this year, top 3 in my career), and I like to see specifics: about skills and strengths. The rankings and comparisons are even more helpful if they can say a few words about what other students in the same equivalence class have done (e.g., "as good as students who have gone to Stanford and Princeton"). I would really like to see comparisons against specific named students, but I realize that for most schools, such comparisons are not very useful. If they're writing multiple letters, it'd be good to get rankings or equivalence classes among them, as well, but we never see this unless we specifically ask.

Calvin Lin – TS Program Director

Page 25: The Writing of Recommendations for Turing Scholars

More specifically…• Rank compare to peers and all students in past (with number of

years)

• Address ability to learn on their own

• Address particularly talent in math, science, and CS

• Do they do things on their own?– programming projects?– do they extend the given projects?

• Are they the person of whom others ask questions?

Mike Scott – TS Admissions Committee