Upload
duonghanh
View
238
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Document of
The World Bank
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Report No: 60183-TZ
PROJECT PAPER
ON A
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL CREDIT
IN THE AMOUNT OF SDR 36.4 MILLION
(US$ 59 MILLION EQUIVALENT)
TO THE
UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
FOR THE
TRANSPORT SECTOR SUPPORT PROJECT
June 6, 2011
Transport Sector
Country Department AFCE1
Africa Region
This document has a restricted distribution and may be used by recipients only in the
performance of their official duties. Its contents may not otherwise be disclosed without World
Bank authorization.
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
Pub
lic D
iscl
osur
e A
utho
rized
CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS
Exchange Rate Effective April 30, 2011
Currency Unit = Tanzania Shilling (TZS)
TZS 1,508.50 = US$1
US$1.621 = SDR 1
FISCAL YEAR
July1 – June 30
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AF Additional Financing
AfDB Africa Development Bank
AGL Aeronautical Ground Lighting
BADEA Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa
CAS Country Assistance Strategy
CD Chart Datum
CODAP Coordination of Donor Aided Projects
COST Construction Sector Transparency
CTCP2 Second Central Transport Corridor Project
CPS County Partnership Strategy
CQS Cost and Qualification Selection
DANIDA Danish International Development Agency
DFID Department for International Development
DP Development Partner
DVELA Driver and Vehicle Examination and Licensing Agency
EC European Commission
EIA Environmental Impact Assessment
EMP Environmental Management Plan
ESIA Environmental and Social Impact Assessment
FA Financing Agreement
FBS Fixed Budget Selection
FM Financial Management
GoT Government of Tanzania
GoZ Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar
IATA International Air Transport Association
IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development
IC Individual Consultant
ICB International Competitive Bidding
IDA International Development Association
IFMS Integrated Financial Management System
IFR Interim Financial Report
IRP2 Second Integrated Roads Project
ISR Implementation Status and Results Report
JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency
JISR Joint Infrastructure Sector Review
LCS Least Cost Selection
MCC Millennium Challenge Corporation
MKUKUTA Mkakati wa Kukuza Uchumi na Kupunguza Umaskini Tanzania
Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy for mainland Tanzania)
MKUZA Mkakati wa Kukuza Uchumi na Kupunguza Umaskini Zanzibar (Growth and Poverty Reduction Strategy for Zanzibar)
MoIC Ministry of Infrastructure and Communications, Zanzibar
MOID Ministry of Infrastructure Development
MoT Ministry of Transport
MoW Ministry of Works
NCB National Competitive Bidding
NRSA National Road Safety Agency
NYD Not Yet Due
OP/BP Operational Policy/Bank Procedure
OPEC Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
ORAF Operational Risk Assessment Framework
PAD Project Appraisal Document
PDO Project Development Objective
PEFAR Public Expenditure and Financial Assessment Review
PFM Public Financial Management
PFMRP Public Financial Management Reform Program
PMO-RALG Prime Minister‟s Office - Regional Administration and Local Government
PMU Project Management Unit
PPP Public Private Partnership
PPRA Public Procurement Regulatory Authority
PRSC Poverty Reduction Support Credit
RAIS Road Accident Information System
RAP Resettlement Action Plan
SDR Special Drawing Rights
SIL Specific Investment Loan
SSS Single Source Selection
TAA Tanzania Airports Authority
TANROADS Tanzania National Roads Agency
TPA Tanzania Port Authority
TSIP Transport Sector Investment Program
TSSP Transport Sector Support Program
TZS Tanzanian Shillings
Vice President: Obiageli Katryn Ezekwesili
Country Director:
Sector Director:
John Murray McIntire
Jamal Saghir
Sector Manager: Supee Teravaninthorn
Task Team Leader: Negede Lewi
UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
TRANSPORT SECTOR SUPPORT PROJECT ADDITIONAL FINANCING
CONTENTS
Additional Financing Data Sheet .............................................................................................. i
I. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1
II. Background and Rationale for Additional Financing ...................................................... 1
III. Proposed Changes .............................................................................................................. 3
IV. Appraisal Summary ........................................................................................................... 6
Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring ................................................................... 10
Annex 2: Operational Risk Assessment Framework (ORAF) ........................................... 15
Annex 3: Detailed Description of New Project Activities ................................................... 18
Annex 4: Revised Project Costs ............................................................................................ 24
Annex 5: Revised Economic Analysis .................................................................................. 25
Annex 6: Procurement ........................................................................................................... 26
i
UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA
TRANSPORT SECTOR SUPPORT PROJECT
ADDITIONAL FINANCING DATA SHEET
Basic Information - Additional Financing (AF)
Country Director: John M. McIntire
Sector Manager: Supee Teravaninthorn
Team Leader: Negede Lewi
Project ID: P126206
Expected Effectiveness Date: October 30, 2011
Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan
(SIL)
Additional Financing Type: Restructuring and
Scale Up‟
Sectors: Aviation (97%); and Ports (3%).
Themes: Infrastructure services for private sector
development (30%); Rural services and
infrastructure (40%); and Trade and Facilitation
(30%)
Environmental category: Category B – Partial
Assessment
Expected Closing Date: June 30, 2015
Joint IFC: NO
Joint Level: N/A
Basic Information - Original Project
Project ID: P055120 Environmental category: Category B –Partial
Assessment
Project Name: Transport Sector Support Project Expected Closing Date: June 30, 2015
Lending Instrument: Specific Investment Loan
(SIL)
Joint IFC: NO
Joint Level: N/A
AF Project Financing Data
[ ] Loan [ X ] Credit [ ] Grant [ ] Guarantee [ ] Other:
Proposed terms: Standard IDA Credit Terms
AF Financing Plan (US$m)
Source Total Amount (US $m)
Total Project Cost:
Co-financing:
Borrower:
Total Bank Financing:
IBRD
IDA
New
Recommitted
59.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
59.00
ii
Client Information
Recipient:
Ministry of Finance
P. O. Box 9111
Dar es Salaam - Tanzania
Fax: +255 22 2117790
Agencies:
Tanzania National Roads Agency
Eng. Patrick A. L. Mfugale, CE
P. O. Box 11364
Dar es Salaam - Tanzania
Telephone No.: +255 22 2926001/6
Fax No.: +255 22 2926011
Email: [email protected]
Ministry of Infrastructure and Communications (MoIC) Zanzibar
Dr. Vuai I. Lila
Principal Secretary, MoIC
Zanzibar
Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]
Tel: +255 24 2232841
Dir: +255 24 2231391
Mob: +255 777 413080
+255 784 304180
Fax: +255 24 2231465
Prime Minister‟s Office - Regional Administration and Local Government (PMO-RALG)
Mrs. Eline Kayanda
Engineer
PMO – RALG
Mob: +255 713448835
Email: [email protected]
AF Estimated Disbursements (Bank FY/US$m)
FY 2012 2013 2014 2015
Annual 5.00 20.00 20.00 14.00
Cumulative 5.00 25.00 45.00 59.00
iii
Project Development Objective and Description
Original project development objectives: The project development objectives (PDOs) are to
improve the condition of the national paved road network, to lower transport cost on selected
roads, and to expand the capacity of selected regional airports.
The PDO has been revised to reflect the additional activities financed under the Additional
Financing. The revised PDOs are: to improve the condition of the national paved road network, to
lower transport cost on selected roads and to Songo Songo Island, and to expand the capacity of
selected airports.
Project Description
1. Component A: (IDA financing US$ 186.5 million) Rehabilitation and upgrading of the
Korogwe – Mkumbara - Same and Arusha – Minjingu roads, and the preparation of design
and bidding documents for about 911 km of national roads, and capacity building for
TANROADS.
2. Component B: (IDA financing US$ 57.5 million) Paving and rehabilitation of the runway
at Kigoma airport, and Tabora airports; Extension, rehabilitation and paving of the runway
and the replacement of the apron, terminal and car parking at Bukoba airport.
3. Component C: (IDA financing US$ 6.0 million) Improved road safety management by
supporting the establishment of (i) a National Road Safety Agency (NRSA), (ii) a Driver
and Vehicle Examination and Licensing Agency (DVELA) and (iii) a Road Accident
Information System (RAIS).
4. Component D: (IDA financing US$ 5.0 million) Promotion of public private partnerships
(PPP) through: (i) capacity building for the implementation of PPP projects, (ii) feasibility
studies for potential PPP projects, and (iii) Provision of transaction advisors for projects
found feasible.
5. Component E: (IDA financing US$ 5.0 million) Emergency repair of parts of national
roads and bridges damaged by floods in one hundred locations throughout Tanzania.
The proposed additional credit would help finance the costs associated with:
1. Component B2: (IDA financing US$ 57.0 million) Rehabilitation and extension of
Zanzibar airport taxiways and apron. (Scale up of the airport component)
2. Component F: (IDA financing US$ 2.0 million) Rehabilitation of the Songo Songo Island
jetty. (New component added)
iv
Safeguard and Exception to Policies
Safeguard policies triggered:
Environmental Assessment (OP/BP 4.01)
Natural Habitats (OP/BP 4.04)
Forests (OP/BP 4.36)
Pest Management (OP 4.09)
Physical Cultural Resources (OP/BP 4.11)
Indigenous Peoples (OP/BP 4.10)
Involuntary Resettlement (OP/BP 4.12)
Safety of Dams (OP/BP 4.37)
Projects on International Waters (OP/BP 7.50)
Projects in Disputed Areas (OP/BP 7.60)
Yes
No
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
No
No
Does the project require any exceptions from Bank policies?
Have these been approved by Bank management?
Yes
Yes
Conditions and Legal Covenants:
Financing Agreement
Reference
Description of Condition/Covenant Date Due
Article V - 5.01 The Implementation Agreement has been duly
executed on behalf of the Recipient and
TANROADS, and the Project Implementation
Plan has been adopted.
By Effectiveness
Article V - 5.02 The Implementation Agreement has been duly
authorized or ratified by the Recipient and
TANROADS and is legally binding upon the
Recipient and TANROADS in accordance with
its terms.
By Effectiveness
Schedule 2
Section I E.2
The Recipient shall: (a) not later than thirty
days after Effectiveness, open and maintain an
escrow account in a commercial bank on terms
and conditions satisfactory to the Association,
including appropriate protection against set-off,
seizure or attachment (“Escrow Account”); (b)
thereafter, but not later than December 31, 2011,
deposit into the Escrow Account such amounts
as shall be required pursuant to the RAP to pay
compensation to the Affected Persons; and (c)
ensure that all amounts so deposited into the
Escrow Account shall be exclusively used to
pay compensation to the Affected Persons in
accordance with the RAP.
Thirty days after
Effectiveness
1
I. Introduction
1. This Project Paper seeks the approval of the Executive Directors to provide an additional
credit in an amount of US$59 million to the United Republic of Tanzania for the Transport
Sector Support Project (TSSP); (P055120, Credit number 4724-TZ).
2. The proposed Additional Credit would help finance the costs associated with: (i) a scale
up of the airport component of the project, through the rehabilitation and extension of the
Zanzibar airport taxiways and apron, and (ii) the addition of a new component, the rehabilitation
of the Songo Songo Island Jetty. The PDO is also being revised to reflect the additional activities
financed under the Additional Financing. The closing date of the project will remain as per the
original project, i.e. June 30, 2015.
II. Background and Rationale for Additional Financing
3. Country Context: The modified and scaled-up activities under the Additional Financing
(AF) are fully consistent with the development objectives of the project as well as with the
country‟s poverty reduction strategy (Kiswahili acronym MKUKUTA II), the Zanzibar Strategy
for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (Kiswahili acronym MKUZA II), and the Bank‟s Country
Assistance Strategy (CAS) of March 1, 2007, which all emphasize the need for improved
transport infrastructure. The activities included under the AF are also aligned with and would
contribute to the economic and social objectives of the World Bank‟s New Africa Strategy of
March 2011 through the provision of increased connectivity and transport facilitation in the
project areas.
4. Transport Sector Investment Program (TSIP): The activities are also consistent with the
10 year Tanzania TSIP (2007/08-2016/17) which the TSSP is supporting in partnership with the
different Donors including the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Japan International
Cooperation Agency (JICA), the European Commission (EC), the Danish International
Development Agency (DANIDA), the Millennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), the
Department for International Development (DFID), the World Bank, as well as Korea, Kuwait,
Abu Dhabi, the Arab Bank for Economic Development in Africa (BADEA) and Organization of
the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC). Donor Partners are well coordinated in a Transport
Sector Development Partner group whose secretariat is provided by the EC. Annual Joint
Infrastructure Sector Review (JISR) meetings are being held where the implementation of TSIP
is being reviewed and progress monitored through a joint Performance Assessment Framework
linked to the growth cluster of the MKUKUTA. Joint (GoT-DP) Technical Committee meetings
are held quarterly to review progress of the implementation of the action program agreed during
the JISR meetings. The same country partnership strategy (CPS) would be followed under the
AF.
5. Original credit and AF: The original credit amount is US$270 million. The credit was
approved on May 27, 2010 and became effective on December 1, 2010. It supports the three
years slice of the TSIP through the rehabilitation and preparation of designs for part of the paved
national road network, and the rehabilitation and/or upgrading of regional airports. It also
supports the establishment of the National Road Safety Agency (NRSA) and Driver and Vehicle
Examination and Licensing Agency (DVELA), and a Road Accident Information System. The
2
project promotes public private partnerships (PPP) through: (i) capacity building for the
implementation of PPP projects, (ii) feasibility studies for potential PPP projects, and (iii)
provision of transaction advisors for projects found feasible. It also supports the emergency
repair of parts of the national roads and bridges damaged by floods in 2009/2010 in 21 regions.
The Project Development Objectives (PDOs) are to improve the condition of the paved national
road network, to lower transport cost on selected roads, and to expand the capacity of selected
regional airports. The PDO has been revised to better focus the objectives of the project. The
scope of the project however is being expanded by a scale up of the airport component, through
the rehabilitation and extension of the Zanzibar airport taxiways and apron, and (ii) the addition
of a new component, the rehabilitation of the Songo Songo Island jetty.
6. Implementation Performance: The achievement of the PDO, overall implementation
progress, and sub-ratings of the project are all satisfactory except for procurement which was
rated moderately unsatisfactory, during February 2011 supervision mission, due to some delays
in implementing the agreed procurement plan. The delays were attributable to inadequate
procurement capacity at Tanzania National Roads Agency (TANROADS) due to excessive
workload. With the recruitment of three additional procurement specialists in December 2010,
there are signs that the project performance with regard to procurement is improving. The
emergency repair of parts of the national roads and bridges damaged by floods in 2009/2010 has
been progressing well with the implementation of 106 small contracts in 21 regions. As of
February 28, 2011 about 585 kilometers of roads has received emergency maintenance while 212
culverts were reconstructed. The recruitment of consultants and contractors for the other
components of the project has now reached an advanced stage after delays in implementing the
agreed procurement plan. The International Development Association (IDA) has already given
the no objection to award one of the major roads contracts (US$50.38 million), while the bids for
the remaining two roads and three airports works contracts are under evaluation. Competition for
the works has been satisfactory, and the lowest evaluated and/or lowest priced bids are generally
within appraisal estimates.
7. Rationale: The Borrower has requested the additional financing in its letter dated March
30, 2011. The key rationale for such request is the huge need for infrastructure and the limited
capacity for local financing. The request comes at this early stage of implementation because
Tanzania would like to make use of IDA-15 allocation for these high priority sub-projects, and
also because of their readiness for implementation. As less than 12 months have elapsed since
effectiveness of the project a waiver was required for such early processing of an AF and was
received from the Regional Vice President (RVP) Africa Region on April 20, 2011.
8. Foreseen risk factors: The risk of the original project and in the Operational Risk
Analysis Framework (ORAF) found in Annex 2 is assessed as Medium- Likelihood. One of the
main risks related to the weakness of the procurement capacity of TANROADS has been
remedied through the employment of additional procurement specialists. The additional finance
credit involves two additional implementing ministries, the Ministry of Infrastructure and
Communications Zanzibar (MoIC) and Prime Minister‟s Office - Regional Administration and
Local Government (PMO-RALG). MoIC Zanzibar is involved in the execution of the Second
Central Transport Corridor Project (CTCP2) and is being strengthened through this project.
3
Appropriate measures will be taken to enhance and assist PMO-RALG to implement the Songo
Songo Island jetty improvement.
9. Governance in Transport Sector: Tanzania completed the process of formation of
agencies to provide autonomy in project implementation through the creation of TANROADS in
2000 under the executive agencies act, 1997. The process has worked well, even though the level
of autonomy of TANROADS needs to be further strengthened. TANROADS has robust
professional capacity and systems to ensure responsible and efficient project implementation.
The Roads Fund Board was established in 1998 to ensure the availability of sufficient funds for
maintenance of roads through the levy of a surcharge on fuel. This innovation has resulted in the
availability of sustainable funding for roads maintenance. The Tanzania Airports Authority
(TAA) was established as a semi-autonomous agency under the Ministry of Transport (MoT) in
1999 under the executive agencies act, 1997. TAA is planned to become fully autonomous,
corporate body, and the drafting of the Bill is ongoing (planned to be finalized in 2012). On the
maritime transport side, Tanzania Ports Authority (TPA) is a corporate body under the MoT
since 2004. TPA is planned to become a landlord port whereby all/most operations at the ports
will be done by the private sector. TPA is currently developing a strategy to that effect. Tanzania
has been a pilot country under the Construction Sector Transparency (COST) initiative since
2008. The first public disclosure of project information was made in February 2011, the case of
six major government projects. This initiative will be carried forward and strengthened.
III. Proposed Changes
10. The PDO has been revised to reflect the additional activities financed under the
additional financing. The reworded objective is to improve the condition of the national paved
road network, to lower transport cost on selected roads and to Songo Songo Island, and to
expand the capacity of selected airports.
11. The AF will improve: (i) the Zanzibar Airport allowing for a substantial increase in
passenger traffic and aviation safety, and stimulate the island‟s tourism sector which is the
mainstay of the local economy, (ii) access to Songo Songo Island. The monitoring indicators
have also been revised to reflect the contributions of the activities towards the project objective.
12. There will be two additional implementing ministries, the MoIC, Zanzibar and PMO-
RALG. There has been longstanding collaboration with both, the MoIC under the on-going
CTCP2, and the PMO-RALG under the completed CTCP.
13. Rehabilitation and Extension of Zanzibar Airport Taxiways and Apron: This is a scale up
of the airport component of the TSSP. The AF will finance the works and the associated
supervision services to rehabilitate, expand and/or extend the existing taxiways and apron.
Under the on-going CTCP2 the runway of the Zanzibar airport was extended and rehabilitated
and works were completed in August 2010. In addition to enhancing the development impact of
the investments made under CTCP2, as the Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar (GoZ) has
secured a loan from the China Exim Bank to finance a new terminal building, the funds proposed
under the AF would materialize the full financing of the airport investments needs. The air traffic
at Zanzibar airport is expected to grow from today‟s 0.5 million passengers to 1.3 million by
4
2030. This increasing traffic coupled with the deteriorated condition of the taxiways and apron
makes their rehabilitation and expansion very urgent. The bottlenecks with regards to the apron
and taxiway can even be seen in current operations of the airport. Since the longest taxiway
(taxiway C) has deteriorated to the extent that it can no longer be used by large aircraft, and the
taxiway to the northern end of the runway (taxiway A) is too close to surrounding buildings, only
one remaining taxiway (taxiway B) is usable. Often the apron gets so filled up with aircraft that
additional arriving aircraft need to park on the taxiway. At this point the runway becomes
inaccessible to larger aircraft on the apron, until taxiway B has been cleared.
14. Songo Songo Island Jetty: The rehabilitation of the jetty is not only an essential transport
facility to the Songo Songo Island but also a recommended social mitigation measure for the
closed Bank financed Songo Songo gas extraction project (P002797). During the implementation
of the Songo Songo gas extraction project, the existing jetty on Songo Songo Island was taken
over by the project and a new jetty was constructed on the western shoreline of the island for the
use of the Songo Songo villagers. This new jetty has not been providing satisfactory services for
the villagers, as it submerges during high spring tidal periods. As the jetty is constructed on a
drying foreshore, it cannot be used at low spring tidal periods or allow local craft to remain
safely afloat at all states of the tide. The aim is to assist to rectify the situation and the project
interventions would include: (a) raising the height and increasing the width of the existing
structure and extending it to deeper water allowing local boats access during low spring tidal
periods; and (b) constructing a breakwater to minimize the effects of adverse weather on the site
of the jetty; and construction of ramps and stairs. Since the Songo Songo Energy Project closed
on December 31, 2010 it was decided that this component would be attached to the Transport
Sector Support Project (TSSP).
Changes to Project Outcome Indicators
15. Table 1 below shows the changes of the project‟s outcome indicators:
Table 1: Changes to the Project Outcome Indicators
Indicator Original target Changes with
AF
Revised target
Average vehicle
operating cost on
Korogwe – Same road
Down to 23 US cents from
34 US cents per kilometer by
FY13/14
No changes No revision
Average vehicle
operating cost on
Arusha – Minjingu road
Down to 25 US cents from
45 US cents per kilometer in
FY13/14
No changes No revision
Roads in good and fair
condition as a share of
total classified roads
Improvement from 66% in
FY08/09 to 70% in FY13/14 No changes No revision
Passenger volume at
Bukoba Airport Up from 26,628 in FY08/09
to 34,000 in FY2013/14 No changes No revision
Passenger volume at
Kigoma airport Up from 28,859 in FY08/09
to 40,000 in FY2013/14 No changes No revision
Passenger volume at
Tabora airport Up from 22,912 in FY08/09
to 30,000 in FY2013/14 No changes No revision
5
Passenger volume at
Zanzibar airport New sub-component New target Up from 0.5 million in
FY09/10 to 0.66 million
in FY13/14 Project Beneficiaries Direct beneficiaries: 5.15
million (of which female-
percentage)
Increased
beneficiaries Direct beneficiaries
revised to 5.7 million
Revised Project Costs
16. Table 2 below shows the changes of the project cost by component.
Table 2: Revised Project Costs by Component (US$ million)
Component Original
Cost (IDA
only)
Changes with
AF Revised Cost
A. Rehabilitation and preparation of designs for
rehabilitation of paved trunk roads 186.5 - 186.5
B. Improvement of airports
B1. Improvement of Regional airports
B2. Improvement of Zanzibar airports
57.5 57.5
57.0 57.0
C. Improvement of road safety 6.0 - 6.0
D. Promotion of public-private partnerships 5.0 - 5.0
E. Emergency Road and Bridge Repair 15.0 - 15.0
F. Rehabilitation of Songo Songo Island Jetty (new) - 2.0 2.0
Total 270.0 59.0 329.0
Institutional Implementation Arrangements
17. The Component B2 will be implemented by the Zanzibar MoIC, while component F will
be implemented by PMO-RALG. The TANROADS would continue to be responsible for the
overall coordination of the projects including: (i) the management of the designated account; (ii)
financial management and reporting of the overall project; (iii) ensuring the execution of the
audit of the project; (iv) preparation of quarterly financial and bi-annual progress reports with
inputs from PMO-RALG and MoIC; and (v) oversight of the procurement and contract
management activities of the other executing agencies. In order to ensure that the project is
effectively implemented TANROADS, PMO-RALG and MoIC will ensure that appropriate
staffing arrangements are maintained throughout the life of the project.
18. The MoIC would keep the existing project management arrangements, for the
implementation the airport component of the CTCP2, over the period of the implementation of
the AF. This includes keeping a Project Manager, holding such qualifications and experience
6
acceptable to the World Bank, who will be managing the implementation of the component. The
Project Manager will directly report to the Permanent Secretary of MoIC and will be responsible,
among others, for the overall implementation of the Component B2. The Project Manager will:
(i) oversee all the activities of the contractor and supervising consultant and provide appropriate
guidance and direction to them as required, (ii) deal with all project correspondences
appropriately, (iii) review payments certificate prepared by supervising consultant to approval
for payment by the Permanent Secretary, (iv) deal with claims emanating from the construction
contracts, and (v) closely monitor safety and operations at site. MoIC would continue providing
the Project Manager with such facilities as will enable him or her to perform the assignment
effectively during the duration of the project. These include, but are not limited to, an office,
transport, IT facilities and connection, and support staff.
19. The PMO-RALG in collaboration with the District Council at Kilwa shall be responsible
for implementation of Component F of the project including approval of the designs,
procurement of works and services and supervision of construction. PMO-RALG headquarters
shall assign a Project Coordinator who will be responsible for the implementation of the
component. PMO-RALG through the Local Government Authorities (LGA) in Kilwa will ensure
that Local communities are involved in the rehabilitation operation and maintenance of the jetty
as part of community participation through employment. PMO-RALG will pursue the creation of
Local Community Jetty Management Committee and ensure that through the LGA in Kilwa the
capacity of the committee is developed in order to carry out routine maintenance to inculcate to
them a sense of ownership and ensure sustainability of the jetty.
20. After the election in Tanzania held in October 2010, GoT split the Ministry of
Infrastructure Development (MOID), that was responsible for the implementation of the
component C and D of the TSSP, into two ministries, namely Ministry of Transport (MoT) and
Ministry of Works (MoW). The split have no adverse effect on the performance of the project as
the MoW and MoT took over the responsibility for the implementation of the Component C and
D of the project, respectively.
IV. Appraisal Summary
Economic
21. The overall cost for the airport, including the work already done on the runway surface
and extension, under the CTCP2 is estimated to be US $ 105.60 million. Moving data from the
2004 Tanzania Tourism Sector Survey forward, with an annual income growth rate of two
percent representing the growth in spending per tourist, it was estimated that tourism expenditure
in Zanzibar per passenger will rise from US$248.82 in 2013 to US$624.90 in 2032, with
additional income due to the added passenger flows created by the project, growing from an
annual total of US$14.30 million in 2013 to US$190 million annually in 2032. Measuring the
local benefits estimated to be gained in fishing, agriculture, and other business ventures, in the
same periods the overall estimated benefit for the period is US$1,680.60 million. The entire
project investment was then discounted against revenues for the 20 year period between 2012
and 2030. The results show an internal rate of return of 12.3 percent, and a positive net present
value (NPV) of US$198.23 million at a discount rate of 12 percent.
7
Financial Management
22. There are no changes being proposed to the financial management (FM) arrangements of
the original Credit under TSSP. The designated account under the original financing will also be
used for the additional financing. The financial reporting for the additional financing will be
integrated into the financial reports for the original credit, and figures for each financing
separately reported therein. The entire additional financing management would be coordinated
and managed by TANROADS, using the existing TSSP FM arrangements which have been
found to be satisfactory. The FMS risk rating is moderate. This includes the accounting, planning
and budget, internal and external audit, flow of funds, and submission of Interim Financial
Reports (IFRs). The assessment of TANROADS financial management capacity took into
consideration the FM performance of the IDA projects (CTCP2 and TSSP) currently being
implemented by TANROADS, and the CTCP which closed in December 2009 which are rated
satisfactory. A review of the TANROADS‟ latest available unqualified audit reports for the years
ended June 30, 2008, 2009, and 2010 were found to be satisfactory.
Procurement Arrangements
23. The procurement arrangement for the proposed AF would include two additional
implementing entities. The procurement for the Component B2 will be implemented by the
Zanzibar MoIC, while that of the Component F will be implemented by PMO-RALG. However
the TANROADS would continue to be responsible for the oversight of the procurement and
contract management activities of the two agencies. Procurement for the proposed Additional
Financing would be carried out in accordance with the World Bank‟s "Guidelines: Procurement
of Goods, Works and Non Consulting Services under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits & Grants by
World Bank Borrowers" dated January 2011; and "Guidelines: Selection and Employment of
Consultants under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits & Grants by World Bank Borrowers" dated
January 2011; Guidelines on Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption in Projects
Financed by IBRD Loans and IDA Credits and Grants, dated October 15, 2006 and revised in
January 2011; and the provisions stipulated in the Legal Agreement. For each contract to be
financed by the Credit, the different procurement methods or consultant selection methods, the
need for pre-qualification, estimated costs, prior review requirements, and time frame are agreed
between the Recipient and the Bank in the Procurement Plan. A separate Procurement Plan has
been prepared for the AF to take into account the methods and thresholds applicable. The
Procurement Plan will be updated at least annually, or as required, to reflect the actual project
implementation needs and improvements in institutional capacity. Procurement capacity
assessment for MoIC of the GoZ was carried out on April 6, 2011 and is presented in Annex 6.
24. The procurement performance of the project was rated moderately unsatisfactory during
the last supervision mission, due to some delays in implementing the agreed procurement plan.
However, with the recent spurt in procurement advances (due theoretically in part to the
Recipients‟ response to the moderately unsatisfactory (MU) rating) contracts that account for
some 96 percent of the credit amount are expected to be committed by June 2011 and hence the
original project is on track for rapid implementation and disbursement. Please refer to Tables 4
8
and 5 of Annex 6 for the progress of procurement and actions and/or timing agreed in the
processing of each of the contracts included in the original procurement plan.
Social and Environmental Safeguards
25. Zanzibar airport taxiway and apron rehabilitation and extension: An Environmental and
Social Impact Assessment (ESIA) was prepared, approved by the Bank and was disclosed in
Zanzibar on January 18, 2011 and at the Bank‟s InfoShop on January 20, 2011. Environmental
impacts are standard such as air quality reduction due to noise and end equipment emissions
during construction, and the loss of vegetation in areas to be surfaced. Appropriate mitigation
measures have been included in the bidding documents. As most of the works included under the
additional financing involve the rehabilitation and improvement of existing facilities, the
possibility of construction activities affecting physical and cultural sites of national and
international importance is unlikely. However if any physical cultural resource such as burial and
archeological sites is identified during project implementation, the supervising engineers will
ensure that the contractor will implement appropriate measures. These would include informing
local authorities and the Antiquities Department; and preparing an appropriate mitigation plan,
which will be approved before commencing any works in that area, as provided in the
Operational Policy (OP) 4.11 procedure. Guidelines for “chance finds” procedure will be
integrated into the contracts for construction and road maintenance consultants. A Resettlement
Action Plan (RAP) has been prepared, was approved by the Bank and was disclosed in Zanzibar
on January 18, 2011 and at the Bank‟s InfoShop on January 20, 2011. Resettlement is only
triggered by the extension of the taxiway C, which would be done after the completion of the
taxiway rehabilitation and, apron extension and rehabilitation. Seventeen households with both
finished and unfinished houses and 27 small farms are affected. An appropriate relocation site
has been identified nearby. Estimates for the cost of the resettlement are TZS 2 billion and are to
be financed by GoZ. Relevant stakeholders in Zanzibar were consulted during the assessment
exercise. These include project proponent, Ministry of Water, Construction, Energy, Lands and
Environment; and communities surrounding the airport. Zanzibar Airport Management will
create an Environmental control Unit which will be responsible for monitoring the application of
the prepared Environmental Management Plan (EMP) as well as dealing with the mitigation of
unforeseen issues.
26. Improvement of the Songo Songo Island Jetty: There are no outstanding social safeguard
issues regarding the Songo Songo Island Jetty since the RAP for this component, which
originally was under Songo Songo Gas Extraction Project was fully implemented. An
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study for the proposed extension and rehabilitation of
the jetty has been undertaken, reviewed, cleared and disclosed in line with Bank requirements
and procedures. As part of stakeholder consultations the draft EIA report was submitted to
stakeholders in a workshop held at Kilwas on March 26, 2011. Several stakeholders from Songo
Songo village, the district, the Ministry of Energy and Minerals and Songas attended the
workshop.
27. Overall responsibility with the implementation of Environmental Assessment/Social
Assessment (EA/SA) measures and the RAP is with TANROADS. TANROADS has an
experienced social and environmental unit being part of its Directorate of Planning. This unit
will be required to report, as part of the TSSP reports, progress of the implementation of EA/SA
9
measures throughout the project period. Zanzibar Airport Management will appoint an
Environmental control Unit which will be responsible for monitoring the application of the
prepared Environmental Management Plan (EMP) as well as dealing with the mitigation of
unforeseen issues and produce quarterly implementation reports. The PMO-RALG shall
designate among its staff a representative to be the Environmental Control Officer on site to
provide day-to-day supervisory role during implementation as well as preparation of
implementation report.
28. The environmental assessments for the Songo Songo jetty and Zanzibar airport
rehabilitation did not find any real risks of impacts on physical cultural resources. As most of the
works included under the additional financing involve the rehabilitation and improvement of
existing facilities, the possibility of construction activities affecting physical and cultural sites of
national and international importance is unlikely. However, the project has triggered OP 4.11 on
a precautionary basis, given its proximity to cultural resources. If any physical cultural resource
such as burial and archeological sites is identified during project implementation, the supervising
engineers will ensure that the contractor will implement appropriate measures. These would
include informing local authorities and the Antiquities Department; and preparing an appropriate
mitigation plan, which will be approved before commencing any works in that area, as provided
in the OP 4.11 procedure. Guidelines for “chance finds” procedure will be integrated into the
contracts for construction and road maintenance consultants. "
Disbursements
29. The first disbursement under the project was to cater for the six months cash flow
forecast - January 2011 to June 2011 - for the project based on an approved work plan and
budget. Follow up disbursements would be based on submittal of withdrawal application to the
Bank. The original disbursement forecast for the FY11 was US$50 million; however, the project
has disbursed US$43.74 million to-date as per the agreed work plan and budget.
Closing Date
30. The activities to be funded out of the additional financing will not require an extension of
the credit closing date. The project closing date remains June 30, 2015.
31. As the TSSP has been under implementation for less than 12 months and per OP/BP
13.20, the Bank provides additional financing only when it is satisfied that implementation of the
project, including substantial compliance with loan covenants, is satisfactory, it was necessary to
seek the Regional Vice President‟s (RVPs) approval to proceed with the additional financing.
The RVPs approval was granted on April 20, 2011.
10
Annex 1: Results Framework and Monitoring
TANZANIA – TRANSPORT SECTOR SUPPORT PROJECT
Table 1: Revisions to Results Framework
Revisions to the Results Framework Comments/
Rationale for
Change
PDO
Current (PAD) Proposed
The development objectives of the project are: (i) to
improve the condition of the national paved road
network; (ii) to lower transport cost on selected
roads; and (iii) to expand the capacity of selected
airports.
Same but reworded to better focus the objective
of the project.
The reworded objective is to: (i) improve the
condition of the national paved road network,(ii)
to lower transport cost on selected roads and to
Songo Songo Island, and (iii) to expand the
capacity of selected airports.
Slight change in
wording to better
focus on the project
objectives.
PDO indicators
Current (PAD) Proposed change*
1. Average vehicle operating costs on (a) Korogwe-
Same and (b) Arusha – Minjingu roads; No change
2. Roads in good and fair condition as a share of
total classified roads (Core Indicator); No change
3. Passenger volume at (a) Bukoba, (b) Kigoma and
(c) Tabora airports; Passenger volume at (a) Bukoba; (b) Kigoma;
(c) Tabora; and (d) Zanzibar airports;
To add one new
airport (Zanzibar).
4. Direct Project beneficiaries (number) of which
female (%)
Figures remains as is for other components but
number of beneficiaries increases with those of
Zanzibar airport and the Songo Songo Island
Jetty. The Indicator has now been modified to
include female (%).
Increase in the
number of
beneficiaries due to
scale up.
Intermediate Results indicators
Current (PAD) Proposed change*
A.1 Roads rehabilitated –non rural (km) (Core
Indicator).
(a) Korogwe – Same (172 km)
(b) Arusha – Minjingu (98 km)
A.2 Design and bidding documents for rehabilitation
prepared (911 km).
No change
B.1 Kigoma runway paved
B.2 Tabora runway paved
B.3 Bukoba runway paved, terminal building as well
as new access road and car parking constructed.
B.1 Kigoma runway paved
B.2 Tabora runway paved
B.3 Bukoba runway paved, terminal building as
well as new access road and car parking
constructed.
B.4 Zanzibar taxiways and apron
rehabilitated and extended. (new)
To include Zanzibar
airport.
C.1 National Road Safety Agency (NRSA)
established and operational
C.2 Driver and Vehicle Examination and Licensing
Agency (DVELA) established and operational
C.3 Road Accident Information System (RAIS)
No change
11
Revisions to the Results Framework Comments/
Rationale for
Change established and operational.
D. Number of transport sector PPP transactions
which have reached bidding stage.
No change
E. Number of national road/bridge sections
improved.
No change
F. Songo Songo Island Jetty rehabilitated New component.
12
TABLE 2: REVISED PROJECT RESULTS FRAMEWORK
The development objectives of the project are: (i) improve the condition of the national paved road network,(ii) to lower transport cost on selected roads and to Songo Songo
Island , and (iii) to expand the capacity of selected airports.
PDO Level Results Indicators
Co
re UOM
Baseline
Original
Project
Start
(2008)
Progress
To Date
(2011)
Cumulative Target Values
Frequency
Data
Source/
Methodology
Responsibility
for Data
Collection
Comments 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
Average vehicle operating cost on
Korogwe-Same road
US cents
per km
34
-
-
-
23
Completion
report (CR)
HDM-4 TANROADS No change
Average vehicle operating cost on
Arusha – Minjingu road
US cents
per km
45
-
-
-
25
CR
HDM-4 TANROADS No change
Roads in good and fair condition as a
share of total classified roads1 % 66 67 68 69 70 70
Bi annual
Progress
Report
(BPR)
TANROA
DS
quarterly
report
TANROADS
and PMO-
RALG No change
Annual passenger volume at Bukoba
airport2 No. 26,628 34,000
BPR
TAA
Quarterly
Report
TAA No change
Annual passenger volume at Kigoma
airport No. 28,859 40,000
BPR
TAA
Quarterly
Report
TAA No change
Annual passenger volume at Tabora
airport No. 22,912 30,000
BPR
TAA
Quarterly
Report
TAA No change
Annual passenger volume at
Zanzibar airport No.
0.5
million
0.66
million
BRP
Directorate
of Civil
Aviation
Report
MoIC New (Scale up)
Beneficiaries No Direct project beneficiary by the end of project 5.7 million, out
of which 50 % are female CR
Revised from 5.15
million to 5.7 million
Zanzibar airport users: 0.5
milion, Songo Songo Island Jetty
Number
(%)
Direct project beneficiary by the end of project of which 50 %
are female CR
Completion
Survey
PMO-RALG
and MoIC
1 Supplemental Information: Total length of classified road network 86,472 at appraisal of TSSP
2 The figures for 2011 has not been updated as the airports rehabilitation has not started.
13
users: 2500 (of which female)
Intermediate Results and Indicators
Intermediate Results Indicators C
ore
Unit of
Measur
ement
Baseline
Original
Project
Start
2009/10
Progress
To Date
2010/11
Target Values
Frequency Data Source/
Methodology
Responsibility
for Data
Collection
Comments 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
Intermediate Result 1: Rehabilitation and preparation of design for the rehabilitation of paved trunk roads
Roads Rehabilitated – non rural
Korogwe – Same rehabilitated km 0 0 30 110 172 BPR
TANROADS
quarterly
report
TANROADS No change
Roads Rehabilitated – non rural
Arusha – Minjingu rehabilitated km 0 0 20 60 98 BPR
TANROADS
quarterly
report
TANROADS No change
Design and bidding documents for
rehabilitation prepared km 0 0 0 911 BPR
TANROADS
quarterly
report
TANROADS No change
Intermediate Result 2: Improvement of airports
Bukoba runway paved, terminal
building as well as new access
road and car parking constructed
Yes/No Not done No No Yes BPR
TAA
Quarterly
Report
TAA No change
Kigoma runway paved Yes/No Not done No No Yes BPR
TAA
Quarterly
Report
TAA No change
Tabora runway paved Yes/No Not done No No Yes BPR
TAA
Quarterly
Report
TAA No change
Zanzibar taxiways and apron
rehabilitated and extended Yes/No Not done No No Yes BPR MoIC Report
MOIC New (Scale up)
Intermediate Result 3: Improvement of road safety management
14
Intermediate Results and Indicators
Intermediate Results Indicators
Co
re
Unit of
Measur
ement
Baseline
Original
Project
Start
2009/10
Progress
To Date
2010/11
Target Values
Frequency Data Source/
Methodology
Responsibility
for Data
Collection
Comments 2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15
National Road Safety Agency
(NRSA) established Yes/No Not done No Yes BPR
MoW Annual
Report MoW No change
Driver and Vehicle Liscening
Agency (DVELA) established
Yes/No
Not done No Yes BPR
MoW
Quarterly
Report
MoW No change
Road Accident Information System
established and operational
Yes/No
Not done No Yes BPR
MoW
Quarterly
Report
MoW No change
Intermediate Result 4: Promotion of public private partnerships
Transport sector PPP transactions
that have reached bidding stage Number None None None 1 2 BPR
MoT
Quarterly
Report
MoT No change
Intermediate Result 5: Emergency road and bridge repair
National road sections repaired
and financed through component
E
Number None 106 BPR
TANROADS
Quarterly
Report
TANROADS No change
Intermediate Result 6: Rehabilitation of Songo Songo Island Jetty
Songo Songo Island Jetty
improved Yes/No No No Yes BPR
PMO RALG
Quarterly
Progress
Report
PMO-RALG New (Scale up)
15
Annex 2: Operational Risk Assessment Framework (ORAF)
TANZANIA TRANSPORT SECTOR SUPPORT PROJECT
Project Development Objective(s)
The project development objectives (PDOs) are as follows: to improve the condition of the national paved road network, to lower transport cost on
selected roads and to Songo Songo Island, and to expand the capacity of selected airports.
PDO Level Results
Indicators
1. Average vehicle operating costs on (a) Korogwe-Same and (b) Arusha – Minjingu roads.
2. Roads in good and fair condition as a share of total classified roads (Core Indicator);
3. Passenger volume at (a) Bukoba, (b) Kigoma, (c) Tabora, and (d) Zanzibar airports;
4. Direct Project beneficiaries (number) of which female (%)
Risk Category Risk Rating Risk Description Proposed Mitigation Measure
1. Project Stakeholder
Risks
1.1 Airport Users Medium - I
Risk of the improvement of the
airports airside infrastructures may
not result with increase in demand
1. GoT plans to increase the autonomy of the TAA through enacting its
own Bill. This will attract more PPPs in aviation and enable TAA become
more commercial. 2. In parallel to the IDA financing, the GoZ has received funds from
China Exim Bank for construction of new passenger terminal for the
Zanzibar Airport. GoZ will improve the airport management by continuing to implement
reforms as indicated in the Zanzibar transport master-plan approved in
September 2009.
1.2. Donor relation and
Program Co-ordination Low
Risk of improper coordination with
other Donors financing the Transport
sector.
The Works program and interests of Donors in the Transport sector is to
be coordinated through the Transport Donor Group, Joint Technical
Committee (JTC) and the annual Joint Infrastructure Sector review.
16
2. Implementing Agency
Risks Medium - I
Risks are associated with capacity,
Governance, coordination, and fraud
and corruption associated with
procurement and contract
implementation.
A number of measures have been included under the project to enhance
the capacity of implementing agencies; TANROADS is to coordinate
project activities; Contracts implementation information to be made
available to the Construction Sector Transparency initiative (CoST) for
review whenever required.
3. Project Risks
3.1. Design
Medium - L
Large number of components are
likely to complicate the project
implementation.
Severe disruption of traffic during the
implementation of the project.
1. Still remain with one overall implementing agency.
2. Bid documents for road works rehabilitation to allow limited „works-
in-progress‟ lengths.
3. Airport works contractors to produce an agreed program of works that
minimize closures and where needed some works to be executed during
the night.
3.2. Social &
Environmental
Medium - L
Risk of encroachment to resettled
road corridors and airport areas.
Risk of inadequate and unreliable
funding of the environmental and
social mitigation measures.
1. The implementing agencies to conduct regular inspection tour of road
corridor and airport boundaries to ensure no new settlement are
established. Reserved area to be properly demarcated
2. The two roads and three airports in Tanzania mainland have no
resettlement needs. GoZ will allocate Tshs 2 billion in FY11/12 for
Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) implementation at the Zanzibar airport.
An ESIA for the Zanzibar airport taxiway and apron rehabilitation and
extension has been prepared, consulted upon, and disclosed in January
2011. An EIA study for the proposed extension and rehabilitation of the
jetty has been undertaken, reviewed, cleared and disclosed in line with
Bank requirements and procedures..
3.3. Delivery Quality
Low
Risk of delivery of substandard
quality infrastructure by
contractors/vendors.
All the Works to be supervised by qualified international consultant
monitored by TANROADS, TAA, PMO-RALG and MoIC. Reasons for
all premature failures of pavement to be studied.
3.4. Procurement Medium-I Risk of procurement failure and
increase of construction prices.
Post-qualification (open bidding) to be considered for procurement of
works contracts
17
Overall Risk Rating
at Preparation
Overall Risk Rating
During Implementation Comments
Low Medium-L
The Zanzibar airport component is ready for implementation and there are no major unresolved issues thus
the risk for this component is Low. At the same time Songo Songo Island Jetty component is to be
implemented by PMO-RALG through the Kilwa District Council which is not very conversant with Bank
procedures therefore the risk rating for this component is High. However, since the proposed allocation for
Zanzibar airport is US$57 million while the Songo Songo Island Jetty has an allocation of US$2 million,
the overall risk rating is Medium - L as the risks have high likelihood of materializing but with low impact
towards the achievement of the PDO. The major risks associated with high cost of construction under the
original project are no more relevant as the Bids for most of the works are within appraisal estimates. Other
project related risks are either Medium or Low as shown above.
18
Annex 3: Detailed Description of New Project Activities
A. Component B2: Improvement of Zanzibar airports: Zanzibar
A1. Background
1. The proposed rehabilitation and expansion of taxiways and apron is a follow up of the
rehabilitation and extension of the Zanzibar airport runway which was financed and completed
under the Second Central Transport Corridor Project (CTCP2). The runway rehabilitation and
extension was originally planned under the International Development Association‟s (IDA‟s)
Second Integrated Roads Project (IRP2). However, the contractor failed to perform and the
contract was terminated in 2005. IRP2 closed on December 31, 2006 and the component was
transferred to CTCP2. Prior to approval of CTCP2, new bids for rehabilitation and extension of
the runway were issued and received in January 2008. However, the lowest bid was more than
100 percent above the engineer‟s estimate and the bidding process was cancelled due to
insufficient funding. As proposed in the Airport Master Plan study, it was decided to change the
airport development strategy by initially (through CTCP2) repairing of the runway thereby
providing it with an additional life of about six years. Concurrently, design a new parallel
runway that would be built and the existing one would become a taxiway. However the full
rehabilitation and extension of the airport runway was carried out as originally planned based on
the request from GoZ. With approval of the Bank, bids were restated and the contract was
awarded. The selected contractor concluded the works ahead of the contractual time (15
months) in July 2010, within the contract amount and to good quality.
2. The rehabilitation works improved the riding quality and increased the bearing capacity
of the runway, while the extension increased the length of the runway by 560 meters to 3,021
meters allowing for the use of wide-body aircrafts. This has enhanced the potential of Zanzibar
as a tourist destination by attracting direct services from north European and far eastern
markets. The cost of this component by the end of the defect liability period is estimated to be
US$35 million, and includes the cost for both works and supervision contracts.
3. The results of economic analysis showed that the runway was viable even with only the
operational profits and departure tax. When other value additions are included in the analysis,
the proposed investment becomes more justified from both a financial and economic standpoint.
However, the benefits of this rehabilitation and extension of the runway could not be fully
realized as a result of the existing taxiways and apron pose capacity, quality and safety
constraints.
A.2 Proposed Rehabilitation and expansion of taxiways and apron
4. In view of the expected growth of air traffic at Zanzibar airport (expected to grow from
0.5 million passengers in 2010 to 1.3 million by 2030) and the deteriorated condition of the
taxiways and apron their rehabilitation and expansion is now urgent. The bottlenecks with
regards to the current apron and taxiway can be seen in operations even at today's capacities.
Since the longest taxiway (taxiway C) has deteriorated to the extent that it can no longer be used
19
by large aircraft, and the taxiway to the northern end of the runway (taxiway A) is too close to
surrounding buildings, only one remaining taxiway (taxiway B) is usable. Often the apron gets
so filled up with aircraft that additional arriving aircraft have to park on the taxiway. At this
point the runway becomes inaccessible to larger aircraft on the apron, until taxiway B has been
cleared. Additionally, the Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar (GoZ) has secured a loan
from the China Exim Bank to finance an urgently needed new terminal building. Both these
scale up investments will assist to achieve the chosen indicator for the component which is
satisfactory rating of the Zanzibar airport by both airlines and passengers. For location of the
proposed works see Figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Location of Proposed Works at the Zanzibar Airport
5. Over a planning period of 20 years, from 2010 to 2030, passenger demand will increase
from 482,062 passengers in 2010 to nearly three times as much at 1,285,901 passengers.
Growth assumes an annual domestic rate of four percent. For international passengers an initial
growth rate of 10 percent until 2015 is being used, reflecting the immediate effect of an
improved airport, followed by a long term growth rate of four percent. Recognizing the need for
expansion to meet future growth, GoZ has secured finance from China Exim Bank for the
construction of a new, third terminal. However, the construction of the third terminal does not
address the airside shortcomings of the airport, and makes their remedy even more necessary
and urgent.
6. The works have been logically divided into four phases starting with the most critical
activities for the operation of the airport. Phase 1 includes the extension of the current apron
along the runway, with an additional new link taxiway to relieve pressure from taxiway B and
reduce aircraft taxing time on the runway. Phase 2 includes the rehabilitation of taxiways A and
B, and the existing, aged portion of the apron. Phase 3 includes the complete reconstruction of
taxiway C, which is suffering from sub-base failure and would have to be closed if not rebuilt,
nearly doubling runway occupation time for a northern departure (or southern arrival) from 3
minutes and 22 seconds to 6 minutes and 27 seconds. Phase 4 includes the extension of current
taxiway C to the full length of the southern part of the runway, in order to decrease the amount
of taxi time for aircraft on the actual runway.
Extension of
Taxiway C
Rehabilitation of
existing Taxiway C
Extension of
Apron
Rehabilitation of
existing apron Rehabilitation of existing
taxiway A and B
20
A3. Description of Works
7. Phase 1, would extend the current apron from 21,323 m
2 by 48,237 m
2 to a total of
69,560 m2. Phase 1 also includes the new much needed taxiway link of 153m x 25m between
the apron and the runway. Since the apron extension will be along taxiway C, 675 m of taxiway
C, with a shoulder of 9.5 m towards the runway, will be reconstructed. The estimated cost for
phase 1 is US$29.561 million.
8. Phase 2 will rehabilitate taxiways A (120 mm overlay) and B (50 mm overlay). Both
taxiways will have their width increased from 23 m to 25 m, and additional partial shoulder of
areas of 9.5 m on each side. The shoulders for taxiway A will be partial due to existing
structures, such as the original historic terminal one now used for administrative purposes. The
estimated cost for this phase is US$3.53million, and includes new signage and aeronautical
ground lighting systems (AGL) for the taxiways.
9. Phase 3 will reconstruct, and provide shoulder for 640 m of the existing taxiway C at an
estimated cost of US$12.41 million. As with the other taxiways, the width will be increased
from 23 m to 25 m. This phase includes updating signage and lighting systems for the new
dimensions.
10. Phase 4 will extend the taxiway C an additional 650 meters along the runway to its
southern turning bay, and provide additional signage and AGL. The extension will cut on-
runway taxi time from an average of 3.5 minutes to roughly 30 seconds, allowing for a peak rate
of three departures or landings per five minutes. The estimated cost for the extension works is
US$8.77 million.
11. The design aircraft for the airport for establishing apron sizes, taxiways widths, and other
design parameters such as pavement has been determined to be the Airbus 330, which is an
International Air Transport Association (IATA) code E type wide-body aircraft.
12. An ESIA was prepared, approved by the Bank and was disclosed in Zanzibar on January
18, 2011 and at the Bank‟s Infoshop on January 20, 2011 under project ID P124114.
Environmental impacts are standard such as air quality reduction due to noise and end
equipment emissions during construction, and the loss of vegetation in areas to be surfaced.
Appropriate mitigation measures have been included in the bidding documents.
13. A Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) has been prepared, was approved by the Bank and
was disclosed in Zanzibar on January 18, 2011 and at the Bank‟s Infoshop on January 20, 2011
under P124114. Resettlement is only triggered by Phase 4 of the works, the extension of the
taxiway. Seventeen households with both finished and unfinished houses and 27 small farms are
affected. An appropriate relocation site has been identified nearby. Estimates for the cost of the
resettlement are TZS 2 billion and are to be financed by GoZ.
21
Table 1: A Description of the Proposed Pavement Works
Works Section Surface Treatment Proposed Construction Finished Level
Above Existing
mm
Apron Existing Mill 50mm
surfacing
60 + 40mm bituminous 50mm
Extension Excavate to
required formation
New construction
(200 + 200 mm granular + 150 +
60 + 40mm bituminous = 650mm)
50-450mm
Taxiway A
Including link
taxiway
Mill 40mm
surfacing (reduced
milling because of
thin current
construction)
Overlay construction (60 + 60 +
40mm) bituminous
120mm
B
(link taxiway)
Mill 50mm
surfacing
60 + 40mm bituminous 50mm
C
(Existing)
Including link
taxiway
Break out existing
construction &
excavate to
required formation
New construction
(200 + 200 mm granular + 150 +
60 + 40mm bituminous = 650mm)
50-450mm
C
(Extension)
Including link
taxiway
Excavate to
required formation
New construction
(200 + 200 mm granular + 150 +
60 + 40mm bituminous = 650mm)
50-450mm
D
(maintenance
hangar)
Break out existing
construction &
excavate to
required formation
New construction
(200 + 200 mm granular + 150 +
60 + 40mm bituminous = 650mm)
50-450mm
Runway
Link
Taxiways
- Excavate to
required formation
New construction
(200 + 200 mm granular + 150 +
60 + 40mm bituminous = 650mm)
0-450mm
B. Component F: Improvement of the Songo Songo Island Jetty
B.1 Background
14. The proposed rehabilitation of the Island Jetty on Songo Songo Island is not only
essential to the transport facilities to and from the island but also a recommended social
mitigation measure for the closed Bank financed Songo Songo gas extraction project
(P002797). During the implementation of the Songo Songo gas extraction project, the existing
jetty on Songo Songo Island was taken over by the project and a new jetty was constructed on
the western shoreline of the island for the use of the Songo Songo villagers. This new jetty has
not been providing satisfactory services for the villagers, as it is being overtopped during very
22
high tides and the length of the jetty is not enough for arriving boats to approach it during low
tides. Furthermore, lightering facilities such as stairs and rails are inappropriate and the jetty is
too narrow. Since the Songo Songo Energy Project closed on December 31, 2010 it was decided
that this component would be attached to TSSP.
B.2 Proposed Rehabilitation, Widening and Extension of Jetty and Breakwater
Construction.
15. The jetty was constructed on the western shoreline of the island using pre-cast concrete
blocks, however in a structural oversight the height of the jetty at +4.05m Chart Datum (CD)
became submerged during seasonal high tides which have a maximum of +4.5m CD, and is
subject to considerable wave overtopping during the South East Monsoon. Consequently the
jetty use during this period is largely restricted and in addition to the jetty rehabilitation a
protective breakwater will be constructed to protect the jetty. Use of the jetty at low tides is also
restricted as, despite its 30m length, the existing jetty fails to extend beyond the low water mark
thereby preventing users from gaining access the jetty until the water returns, forcing passengers
and traders to transport their goods over the exposed coral.
Figure 2: Jetty and Breakwater Construction
A3. Description of Works
16. To ensure that access to the jetty is largely unrestricted it is necessary to extend both the
height and the length of the jetty. This will be undertaken in two phases, as there are two clearly
defined stages of construction and in an attempt to minimize the time during which the jetty will
be inaccessible. The first phase is to extend the height of the jetty by 0.8m, thereby insuring that
17. To ensure that access to the jetty is largely unrestricted it is necessary to extend both the
height and the length of the jetty. This will be undertaken in two phases, as there are two clearly
defined stages of construction and in an attempt to minimize the time during which the jetty will
be inaccessible. The first phase is to extend the height of the jetty by 0.8m, thereby insuring that
the platform extends beyond the highest astronomical tide. The width of the jetty will also be
Increase the width and height
of existing jetty
Increase the length
of the jetty by 20m
Construct a rubble
mound breakwater
23
increased by 2.0m by introducing 1m wide sections to the sides of the existing jetty, as the
current width of 3.5m is inadequate for the volumes of goods and passengers at peak periods
and increases the risk of accident/injury. Four sets of concrete stairs, two on either side of the
jetty, will extend down to the sea bed. The stairways will be provided at berthing faces for
access to and from small vessels. Landings will be provided at 0.75m above mean high, mean
and mean low water levels and will be 1.5m long. Recessed mooring rings will be provided at
each level.
18. Once the rehabilitation of the existing structure is complete, an additional 20m will be
added to jetty in an effort to ensure access to the jetty is not regulated by tidal conditions. The
sea floor will be dredged to a depth of -3.25CD before the extension can be added, ensuring that
large coral features are carefully relocated and damage to the surrounding environment is
minimized. A rubble foundation at least 1.0m thick will be placed on top of the foundation
stratum and the base should extend at least 1.0m on each side of the wall base to accommodate
any construction tolerance and to spread the load.
19. The extensions will be in the form of multiple layers. The south side will continue at the
new height of +4.85CD for the length of the extension, whilst the North half will step down 1m,
followed by another 1m step down 10m along the jetty. The reduced height will ensure that
access to the jetty platform will be possible at low tide, while the continuous level will
guarantee the jetty structure is visible at high tide. A hand rail will be positioned between the
sections to ensure a safe working environment. To prevent accidental grounding/collision with
the submerged sections a 500mm x 500mm concrete column shall be constructed at the corner
of the reduced section of the jetty, extending to the top level of the jetty. Two sets of ladders
will be installed on either side of the jetty to ensure that access to the jetty from the water is
possible at all times. Ladders will be fabricated from steel and positioned in such a way that
they will not be obstructed by mooring lines
20. General public lighting shall be provided at intervals not exceeding 10m, ensuring that
the positioning of the structures does not cause an obstruction. Where lighting poles cannot be
deployed on both sides of the jetty, a single central pole shall be used with extended
overhanging lights. In order to identify the extremity of the jetty a single jetty light shall be
positioned at the centre point of the jetty.
21. The breakwater will be constructed some 25m to the South and parallel to the existing
jetty. It will be constructed with a core of 1-3 ton rock segments covered with 3 ton armor
segments and will have a height of +5.3 CD. At its crest the breakwater will have a width of 1m.
The breakwater shall extend seaward as far as the existing jetty, making it approximately 75m
long. The newly extended section of the jetty will protrude beyond the protected region,
however as this section is expected to be used predominantly in low tide, and thus calmer,
conditions, it has not been deemed necessary to extend the breakwater level with the extension.
24
Annex 4: Revised Project Costs
TANZANIA: TRANSPORT SECTOR SUPPORT PROJECT
Total IDA GoT
A. Rehabilitation and preparation of designs for rehabilitation of paved trunk roads 186.5 186.5
A.1 Korogwe – Same (172 km) 101.4 101.4
A.2 Supervision of Korogwe – Same 3.5 3.5
A.3 Arusha town border – Minjingu (98 km) 72.0 72.0
A.4 Supervision of Arusha – Minjingu 2.6 2.6
A.5 Design and preparation of bidding documents for 911 km of road rehabilitation 4.7 4.7
A.6 Office equipment for TANROADS 0.5 0.5
A.7 Training for TANROADS and TAA 1.3 1.3
A.8 Additional operating cost for TANROADS 0.5 0.5
B. Improvement of regional airports 126.20 114.5 11.7
B.1.1 Works at Bukoba Airport 20.4 16.9 3.5
B.1.2 Works at Kigoma Airport 26.7 22.2 4.5
B.1.3 Works at Tabora Airport 19.1 15.9 3.2
B.1.4 Supervision 3.0 2.5 0.5
B.2.1 Works at Zanzibar Airport 55.5 55.5 -
B.2.2 Supervision of Zanzibar airport works 1.5 1.5 -
C. Improvement of road safety 6.0 6.0
C.1 Equipment for NRSA, DVELA and DSE 1.5 1.5
C.2 Services for the establishment of the Road Accident Information System 1.0 1.0
C.3 TA for NRSA, DVELA and DSE 1.5 1.5
C.4 Training for road safety 1.0 1.0
C.5 Initial operating cost of NRSA and DVELA 1.0 1.0
D. Promotion of public-private partnerships in the transport sector 5.0 5.0
D.1 Civil Aviation Masterplan and PPP options 0.7 0.7
D.2 Kisarawe Freight Centre feasibility study and transaction advisor 0.8 0.8
D.3 Study for the removal of bottlenecks on local government roads with PPP 0.5 0.5
D.4 Assistance to RAHCO to develop bankable central rail upgrading program 0.5 0.5
D.5 Other feasibility studies and transaction advise 1.7 1.7
D.6 TA for DPP of MoID 0.3 0.3
D.7 Training for PPP staff at MoID, TANROADS, TAA,TPA, PMO-RALG, MoFEA 0.5 0.5
E. Emergency road and bridge repair 15.0 15.0
F. Songo Songo Island Jetty rehabilitation 2.0 2.0
TOTAL 340.7 329.0 11.7
25
Annex 5: Revised Economic Analysis
Component B2: Zanzibar Airport
1. The overall cost for the airport, including the work already done on the runway surface
and extension, is broken down in the table below:
Table 1: Overall Cost for Zanzibar Airport
Description Note Amount (US$)
Apron extension not including work financed by Exim Bank 21,709,400
Rehabilitation of existing apron Phase 1 6,288,093
New link taxiway Phase 1 1,568,236
Rehabilitation of taxiways A and B Phase 2 3,525,234
Rehabilitation of taxiway C Phase 3 12,408,323
Extension of taxiway C Phase 4 8,771,794
Subtotal of new additions to project 54,271,794
Runway rehabilitation and extension Works completed under CTCP2 35,468,048
New apron in front of new terminal Exim Bank financed 14,858,658
Total Airport Investments Including external parties (MS/BCEG) 104,597,786
2. The estimation of the actual costs for the new additions to the project is about US$57
million out of which US$54.27 million is for the base construction cost as noted above allowing
for a six percent contingency. Another US$1.23 is provided for price contingency making the
total requirement for the works contract to US$55.5 million. The supervision costs are estimated
at about US$1.5 million.
3. Moving data from the 2004 Tanzania Tourism Sector Survey forward, with an annual
income growth rate of two percent representing the growth in spending per tourist, it was
estimated that tourism expenditure in Zanzibar per passenger will rise from US$248.82 in 2013
to US$624.90 in 2032, with additional income due to the added passenger flows created by the
project, growing from an annual total of US$14,304,226 in 2013 to US$190,068,604 annually in
2032. Measuring the local benefits estimated to be gained in fishing, agriculture, and other
business ventures, a gain of US$744,497 to US$8,604,180, in between the same periods, is
estimated. The total estimated benefit for the period is US$1,680,575,018.
4. The entire project investment was then discounted against revenues for the 20 year period
between 2012 and 2030. The results show an internal rate of return of 12.3 percent, above the
World Bank threshold of 12 percent, and at a discount rate of 12 percent, a positive net present
value of US$198,230,912.
26
Annex 6: Procurement
1. Procurement for the proposed Additional Financing (AF) would be carried out in
accordance with the World Bank‟s "Guidelines: Procurement of Goods, Works and Non
Consulting Services under IBRD Loans and IDA Credits & Grants by World Bank Borrowers"
dated January 2011; and "Guidelines: Selection and Employment of Consultants under IBRD
Loans and IDA Credits & Grants by World Bank Borrowers" dated January 2011; Guidelines on
Preventing and Combating Fraud and Corruption in Projects Financed by IBRD Loans and IDA
Credits and Grants, dated October 15, 2006 and revised in January 2011; and the provisions
stipulated in the Legal Agreement.
2. Procurement activities for contracts that account for about 97 percent of the AF will be
carried out by the procurement staff of the Procurement Management Unit of the Ministry of
Infrastructure and Communications of the Revolutionary Government of Zanzibar with the
support of the Coordination of Donor Aided Projects (CODAP) staff and two Consultants
attached to CODAP.
3. An assessment of the capacity of the ministry to implement procurement actions for the
Additional Financing was carried out on April 6, 2011. The assessment reviewed the
organizational structure for implementing the activities under the AF and the interaction between
the staff responsible for procurement and other relevant central units for administration and
finance. The key issues and risks concerning procurement for implementation of the procurement
activities have been identified and mitigation measures agreed with the ministry. The main risk is
lack of experience with the Bank‟s procurement procedures including records keeping among the
project management unit (PMU) staff.
4. Training in basic and advance procurement will be required especially for the ministry
staff in order to ensure that they are knowledgeable about Bank and government procurement
procedures.
Details of the Procurement Arrangements Involving International Competitive Bidding
(ICB) and Other Methods
5. List of contract packages to be procured following ICB/direct contracting and other
methods under the additional financing:
Table 1: Works and Goods 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ref.
No.
Contract
(Description)
Estimated
Cost
($’000)
Procure
ment
Method
Prequal
(yes/no)
Domestic
Preference
(yes/no)
Review
by
Bank
(Prior
/Post)
Expected
Bid-
Opening
Date
Comment
Works 1 Civil works contract for
Zanzibar Airport
54,200 ICB NO NO YES October
26, 2011
2 Civil works contract for
Songo Songo Jetty
1300 NCB NO NO NO March 15,
2012
27
6. List of consulting assignments with short-list of international firms and other selection
methods:
Table 2: Consulting Services
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Ref.
No.
Contract Description Estimated
Cost
($‟000)
Selection
Method
Review
by Bank
(Prior /
Post)
Expected
Proposals
Submission
Date
Comments
1 Supervision services for Zanzibar
Airport
1500 SSS* YES August 2,
2011
There is a
supervision
consultant
for prior
activities
2 Supervision Services for Songo
Songo Jetty
200 QCBS YES December
2011
*Subject to the approval of the Bank based on the review of the evidence to be provided to justify the SSS.
(a) Shortlists composed entirely of national consultants: Short lists of consultants for
services estimated to cost less than US$200,000 equivalent per contract may be composed
entirely of national consultants in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of the
Consultant Guidelines.
Advertising
7. All works and goods contracts to be procured under ICB and consultancy services
contracts estimated to cost US$200,000 and more equivalent per contract shall be advertised in
United Nations Development Business (UNDB) online in addition to advertising in national
newspaper(s) of wide circulation.
Thresholds for Procurement Methods and Prior Review
8. Thresholds for procurement methods and for prior review are presented in the Table 3
below.
28
Table 3: Thresholds for Procurement Methods and for Prior Review
Expenditure
Category
Contract Value
Threshold (US$)
Procurement /
Selection Method
Contracts Subject to
Prior Review
Works
≥5,000,000 ICB All <5,000,000
NCB
None (Post review) unless
specified in the PP
<50,000 Shopping None (Post review) All values Direct Contracting All
Goods
≥500,000 ICB All <500,000
NCB
None (Post review) unless
specified in the PP
<50,000 Shopping None (Post review) All values Direct Contracting All
Consulting
Services - Firms1
≥ 200,000 QCBS/ Other
3
(QBS/FBS/LCS) All
< 200,000 CQS/ Other
4
(QBS/FBS/LCS) None (Post Review)
All values SSS All
Consulting
Services –
Individuals (IC)
≥100,000 IC - Qualification All
<100,000 IC - Qualification None (Post review)
All Values IC - SSS All
(a) Review of Terms of References: Terms of Reference for all contracts will be cleared by
the Bank.
Risks and Mitigation Measures Additional Financing
9. Procurement risk for the Additional Financing is assessed as Medium - I. The following
measures were agreed to mitigate the risks:
Inadequate Legal and Regulatory Framework: The World Bank Guidelines, Standard
Bidding Documents and Standard Forms of Evaluation to be used for the procurement of the
contracts under the Additional Financing.
Weak Procurement Capacity: Train procurement staff within PMU so as to upgrade their
procurement skills
3 Shortlists for consultancy services for contracts estimated to cost less than US$200,000 equivalent per contract may be
composed entirely of national consultants in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 2.7 of the Consultant Guidelines. 4 QBS, FBS, and LCS for assignments meeting requirements of paragraphs 3.2, 3.5, and 3.6 respectively, of the Consultant
Guidelines.
29
Risk Assessment of the Original TSSP
10. The procurement risk associated with the original project at this stage is Low as with the
recent spurt in procurement advances there are evidences that contracts that accounts for some 96
percent of allocations of the original credit amount are expected to be committed by end of June
2011.
30
Agreed Procurement Plan during the Appraisal of the TSSP, updated Procurement Plan and the Current Status
Works, Goods and Non Consulting Services
Table 4: List of Contract Packages to be Procured Following ICB
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12
Ref.
No.
Contract
(Description)
Estimated
Cost (including
contingencies)
US$m
Procurement
Method
P-Q
Domestic
Preference
(Yes/No)
Review
by Bank
(Prior /
Post)
Expected
Bid-Opening
Date
Actual Bid
Opening
Date
Revised Bid
Transmission
Status
1 Civil Works contract for
Korogwe – Same –
Mkumbara in two lots;
(172km)
101.4 ICB N N Prior July 15, 2010 Feb 3, 2011 N/A Comment s on
BER sent on
April 28, 2011
2 Civil works contract for
Arusha town border –
Minjingu (98 km)
72.0 ICB N N Prior July 15, 2010 Dec 1, 2010 N/A No-objection
for the award of
the contract was
given on March
8, 2011.
Contract Signed
on May 12,
2011..
3 Civil works contract for
Bukoba airport
20.4 ICB N N Prior July 15, 2010 Feb 25,
2011
N/A
Comment s on
BER sent on
April 20, 2011
4 Civil works contract for
Kigoma airport
26.7 ICB N N Prior July 15, 2010 Feb 25,
2011
N/A
5 Civil works contract for
Tabora airport
19.1 ICB N N Prior July 15, 2010 Feb 25,
2011
N/A
31
2. Consulting Services
Table 5: List of Consulting Assignments with Short-list of International Firms 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Ref.
No.
Description of Assignment
Estimated
Cost
(including
contingencies)
US$m
Selection
Method
Review
by Bank
(Prior /
Post)
Expected
Proposals
Submission
Date
Actual
Proposal
Opening Date
Revised
Proposal
opening
date
Status
1 Supervision of the Korogwe – Same 2 lots 3.5 QCBS Prior na na N/A Contract signed
2 Supervision of Arusha – Minjingu 2.6 QCBS Prior June, 2010 Feb 24, 2011 N/A No-objection on TER
was given on April
23, 2011
3 Supervision of works at three airports 3.0 QCBS Prior May, 2010 Dec 17, 2010 N/A No-objection on TER
was given on April
20, 2011
4 Detailed design for Same – Himo (80km), Himo
– Marangu (13km) and Mombo – Lushoto
(32km)
0.6 QCBS Prior June, 2010 Mar 8, 2011 N/A
TER underway
5 Detailed design for Mtwara – Masasi (200km) 0.9 QCBS Prior June, 2010 Mar 15, 2011 N/A TER underway
6 Detailed design for Makambako – Songea
(295km)
1.2 QCBS Prior June, 2010 Jan 21, 2011 N/A No objection on TER
was given on April
12, 2011
7 Detailed design for Lusahunga – Rusumo
(91km) and Kobero – Nyakasanza (58km)
0.6 QCBS Prior June 2010 Mar 15, 2011 N/A TER underway
8 Detailed design for Mafinga - Makambako –
Igawa (142km)
0.7 QCBS Prior June 2010 Jan 21, 2011 N/A No objection on TER
was given on April 1,
2011
9 Establishment of Road Accident Information S. 1.0 QCBS Prior September 2010 August
19, 2011
No Objection of the
TOR was given on
April 5, 2011
10 Preparation of a civil aviation master plan
including PPP options
0.7 QCBS Prior September 2010 - August
10, 2011
11 Kisarawe Freight Center feasibility study 0.5 QCBS Prior September 2010 - NYD
12 Study for the design of a program for the
removal of bottlenecks on the local government
road network
0.5 QCBS Prior September 2010 - July,8,
2011
13 Assistance to RAHCO to develop bankable
central rail upgrading program
0.5 QCBS Prior November 2010 -
14 TA for DPP in MoID 0.3 IC Prior July 1, 2010 - July 6,
2011
15 TA for DSE - MoW 1.5 QCBS Prior September 2010 August
19, 2011
No Objection of the
TOR was given on
April 5, 2011
Yalova
Kaliua
KasuluKondoa
Manyoni
KibondoKahama
Nzega
Buoen
Njombe
Mpui
Mpanda
Tunduma
Same
Tunduru
Masasi
Utete
Kilwa Kivinje
Wete
Lindi
Mbeya
Koani
Tanga
Moshi
Songea
Mtwara
Iringa
Kibaha
Mkoani
TaboraKigoma
Arusha
Mwanza
MusomaBukoba
Singida
Morogoro
Zanzibar
Mkokotoni
Shinyanga
Sumbawanga
Babati
DODOMA
Dar es Salaam
A R U S H A
MANYARA
M A R A
R U V U M A MTWARA
KILIMANJARO
I R I N G A
L I N D I
D O D O M A
K I G O M A
M WA N Z A
S H I N YA N G A
R U K W A
M B E Y AP WA N I
TA B O R A
ZANZIBARNORTH
PEMBANORTH
PEMBASOUTH
ZANZIBARSOUTH &CENTRALZANZIBARWEST
DAR ES SALAAM
KAGERA
SINGIDA
TA N G A
MOROGORO
K E N Y AUGANDA
ZAMBIA
MOZAMBIQUE
RWANDA
BURUNDI
DEM
. RE
P. O
F CO
NGO
Korogwe
Mkumbara
Minjingu
Yalova
Kaliua
KasuluKondoa
Korogwe
Mkumbara
Minjingu
Manyoni
KibondoKahama
Nzega
Buoen
Njombe
Mpui
Mpanda
Tunduma
Same
Tunduru
Masasi
Utete
Kilwa Kivinje
Wete
Lindi
Mbeya
Koani
Tanga
Moshi
Songea
Mtwara
Iringa
Kibaha
Mkoani
TaboraKigoma
Arusha
Mwanza
MusomaBukoba
Singida
Morogoro
Zanzibar
Mkokotoni
Shinyanga
Sumbawanga
Babati
DODOMA
Dar es Salaam
Songo Songo Island
See inset
0°
30° 35°
30° 35°
40°
40°
5°
10°
0°
5°
10°
A R U S H A
MANYARA
M A R A
R U V U M A MTWARA
KILIMANJARO
I R I N G A
L I N D I
D O D O M A
K I G O M A
M WA N Z A
S H I N YA N G A
R U K W A
M B E Y AP WA N I
TA B O R A
ZANZIBARNORTH
PEMBANORTH
PEMBASOUTH
ZANZIBARSOUTH &CENTRALZANZIBARWEST
DAR ES SALAAM
KAGERA
SINGIDA
TA N G A
MOROGORO
K E N Y AUGANDA
ZAMBIA
MOZAMBIQUE
RWANDA
BURUNDI
DEM
. RE
P. O
F CO
NGO
Mbemkuru
Matandu
Rufiji
Great
Ruaha
Rungwa
Wam
i
Simiyu
Ruvuma
Mara
Kagera
Moyow
osi Ugalla
Pangani
Kilo
mbe
ro
INDIAN
OCEAN
Lake
Tanganyika
LakeMalawi
Lake Rukwa
Lake Natron
Lake Victoria
LakeEyasi Lake
Manyara
To Nakuru
To Malindi
To Kasama
To Kasama
To Kasungu
To Lichinga
To Marrupa
To Chiúre
To Nakuru
To Tororo
To Kampala
To Kampala
To Kama
TANZANIA
This map was produced by the Map Design Unit of The World Bank. The boundaries, colors, denominations and any other informationshown on this map do not imply, on the part of The World BankGroup, any judgment on the legal status of any territory, or anyendorsement or acceptance of such boundaries.
0 50 100 150
0 50 100 150 Miles
200 Kilometers
IBRD 38586
MAY 2011
TANZANIATRANSPORT SECTOR SUPPORT PROJECT
ADDITIONAL FINANCINGCIVIL WORKS & SUPERVISION OFREHABILITATION/UPGRADING OF ROADS
REHABILITATION/PAVING OF AIRPORTRUNWAYS AND APRONS
PROJECT AIRPORT (ZANZIBAR)
SONGO SONGO JETTY
DETAILED DESIGN OFREHABILITATION OF PAVED ROADS
MAIN CITIES AND TOWNSPROVINCE CAPITALSNATIONAL CAPITALMAIN ROADSRAILROADSPROVINCE BOUNDARIESINTERNATIONAL BOUNDARIES
ZanzibarZanzibar
ZANZIBARISLAND
Mangapwani
Bweleo
Mkokotoni
Nungwe
Matemwe
Pongwe
Pingwe
Uroa
Paje
Chwaka
Mtegani
INDIANOCEAN
ZanzibarChannel
0 5 10 15
KILOMETERS