The Wall Street Journal Singapore Bus Strike

7/29/2019 The Wall Street Journal Singapore Bus Strike

1/26

August 31, 2013, 12:12 PM SGT

ByChun Han Wong

This story of a strike by Chinese bus drivers in Singapore offers a close-up look at a major issue facing the

Southeast Asian city-state today: The growing number of migrant workers who underpin Singapores

economy and the social tensions that their presence can generate.

What happened over two days in late November 2012 rattled the foundations of Singapores economicsuccess its business-friendly governance and industrial harmony and prompted a robust response

from the government.

The strike, a rarity in Singapore, resonated across Asia, where other countries are grappling with a

growing dependence on foreign labor, too. And it provided a window into ordinary lives seldom-seen: the

migrants who fan out from China in search of a fatter paycheck abroad.

How to balance the need for new workers from overseas with the preservation of established ways,

presents a major dilemma that policymakers and citizens will wrestle with for years to come.

Chapter One: Contours of Conflict

SINGAPOREIn the cool hours before dawn one Monday in November, this metropolis was at its

calmest, its sleek skyscrapers and tree-lined thoroughfares drained of their daytime bustle.

Most of Singapores 5.3 million residents were still asleep. But there were signs of life at a cluster of

austere housing blocks in the city-states northern suburbs, in a district called Woodlands. It was 3 a.m.

In cramped dormitories, Chinese bus drivers donned maroon shirts and black pants the uniforms of

employees of SMRT Corp., a state-owned public-transport operator.

Then the drivers gathered in clusters near the dormitory gates. Shuttle buses waited to ferry them to bus

terminals dotting the island, part of the dreary pre-dawn drill that ensures Singapores commuters arrive

punctually at work every day.

As the buses idled, the drivers chatted in their native Mandarin. But that morning, the talk was different

Singapore Strike: The Full Story


2/26

from their usual early-morning banter.

AFP/Get ty Images

He Junling said he came across an onlineadvertisement that was part of the SMRT hiring drivein early 2011. He is pictured here on Feb. 25.

He Junling, a 32-year-old mainland Chinese driver, and others walked through the group, spreading the

message that the drivers should refuse to work that day and the next, according to Mr. He and others.

Slimly built with short cropped black hair, Mr. He has a calm, unassuming demeanor. But after one-and-a-

half years at SMRT, his sense of grievance had reached boiling point.

The day before, in an essay addressed to his Chinese co-workers published on an online forum, he had

laid out his case for why the drivers should not go to work. Compared with drivers from Singapore and

neighboring Malaysia, drivers from the Chinese mainland felt they were being discriminated against by the

transport company.

Were all human, yet SMRT management treats us so differently, Mr. He wrote, using an alias that was

known to his Chinese colleagues. Clearly, they think theres so many mainland Chinese available that

they could hire hundreds at a go and fire anyone who steps out of line.

That morning, as he worked the crowd, Mr. He reinforced his message with an appeal to the driverspatriotism and sense of injustice, tapping what the drivers say is a reservoir of frustration accumulated

over several years over issues such as pay and living conditions.

A total of 171 Chinese drivers the majority of them from the Woodlands-district dormitory complied with

his plan. It called for drivers to take medical leave en masse to miss work, according to SMRT public

statements and prosecutors documents later filed in court in a related case. The shuttle buses departed

empty.

Soon company supervisors showed up to try to persuade the men to work. They refused to budge and

demanded to see the chief executive, according to the drivers.

Officials at SMRT, which serves 25% of Singapores bus ridership, declined to comment on the essay

written by Mr. He. They would later acknowledge certain shortcomings and take steps to address them.

But they say the company didnt discriminate against its mainland Chinese drivers and called the workers

actions inappropriate.

The Chinese drivers act of defiance would have been insignificant almost anywhere else. But in

Singapore, a labor protest is a high-stakes game.

For this tightly controlled city-state, famous for its ban even on the sale of chewing gum, the drivers

actions threatened one of its most cherished assets: A long record of maintaining unflinching public order

and efficiency.

Over the past 50 years, that reputation has been a magnet for companies and investors across the globe,

turning Singapore into one of the worlds richest places a manicured island of skyscrapers, eight-lane


3/26

highways, luxury cars and fancy restaurants.

The bus drivers, too, had plenty on the line. Each had spent a small fortune and traveled thousands of

miles for a chance to make a better living. Many were the sole breadwinners in their families. In Singapore,

they became unlikely activists, but not ineffective ones.

The dramatic events they set in motion would cause upheaval at one of Singapores most prominent

companies, leading it to review and revise its practices, and prompt intense public scrutiny of the countrys

way of dealing with employment disputes.

The strike would also spur some changes that may make life better forthe migrants who come in the

future. Yet, for some of the drivers who refused to board the buses that November morning, those changes

would come at a high price.

Singapore hadnt seen anything like it in years.

***

The grievances felt by Mr. He and other Chinese bus drivers in Singapore are part of a broader drama

unfolding in Southeast Asias financial capital.

Like many other rich nations, Singapore has come to count on imported labor from China, Bangladesh,

Indonesia, the Philippines and elsewhere to fuel its economic growth. Many of those imported workers do

jobs that increasingly-affluent Singaporeans arent tempted by: Bus drivers, construction workers,

hospitality staff, among others.

Foreign workers numbered 1.27 million as of December 2012, about one third of the labor force, up from

652,700, or about 28% of the total workforce, in 2002. This immigration surge boosted Singapores

population by nearly 32% since 2000 and helped its economy grow at an average annual rate of about 6%

in the past decade, but also contributed to rising living costs and stagnating low-end wages.

Singapores Gini coefficienta measure of income inequality in which zero indicates that all income is

shared equally and one represents complete concentration of incomerose to 0.478 last year from 0.442

in 2000, making it the second-most unequal economy in the developed world, behind Hong Kong.


4/26

We face difficult choices: We need foreign workers to serve our economy and Singaporeans needs, and

immigrants to make up for our shortfall of babies, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said in a televised

speech on Aug. 8, the eve of Singapores National Day. But we also worry about crowding and

congestion, and maintaining our Singaporean identity.

Foreign workers join a working environment where public dissent is muted and labor protest is virtually

unheard of. Since it came to power in 1959, the Peoples Action Party has enforced strict controls on public

assembly, curbed union powers and rewritten labor laws to favor employers. Unions at the time were

decimated; those that survived were mostly subsumed under the National Trades Union Congress, a

confederation that is often led by a cabinet minister.

Under Singapore law, a union can only strike after obtaining consent from a majority of members through a

secret ballot. Foreign workers on fixed-term contracts arent permitted to become full union members.

A strike can be deemed illegal, according to the law, if its participants pursue causes beyond a specific

trade dispute, and if the action is designed or calculated to coerce the Government either directly or by

inflicting hardship on the community.

Workers performing essential services including health care, firefighting and public transport must give

14 days notice before going on strike. Employees of public utilities including water and electricity services

have no right to strike at all.

The result is what the PAP government calls constructive and dynamic industrial relations managed

under a tripartism model linking workers, employers and the state, according to the website of

Singapores Manpower Ministry, which regulates labor issues and workplace conditions.

Singapores last legal strike occurred in 1986 when workers at U.S. oilfield-equipment company Hydril

picketed their factory for two days to protest the dismissal of several union leaders. Government officials

had approved the strike in advance.

Authorities have since shown little patience for industrial action. In 2002 and 2003, when disputes between

Singapore Airlines and its pilots union threatened to boil over, top government leadersincluding Lee

Kuan Yew, Singapores founding prime ministerweighed in with threats of punitive action, so as to head


5/26

off full-fledged industrial action.

We are telling them, both management and unions, you play this game, there are going to be broken

heads, Mr. Lee, then Senior Minister in Singapores cabinet, said in a December 2003 speech during one

of the disputes.

If we sit back and do nothing and allow this to escalate and test the wills, then it is going to lose hundreds

of millions of dollars in one, two, three months of nastiness, Mr. Lee said then. We are not going to have

that.

***

Reuters

A police van departed the dorms in Woodlands district on Nov. 26, 2012.

Even though Singapore is tiny compared to China a population of just over five million versus 1.3 billion

the island state is enticing to thousands of Chinese workers. It is safe and orderly. Wages for basic jobs

are higher. And it comes with a degree of familiarity: The majority of Singaporeans are ethnic Chinese,

whose ancestors started arriving in large numbers in the 1830s.

SMRT has been hiring bus drivers from China since late 2007 to help staff its fleet of more than 1,050

buses. Foreigners accounted for about 44% of SMRTs 2,000 bus drivers as of the end of last year. Half of

those about 450 were from China, according to SMRT. The other half were from Malaysia. Typically,

the company uses recruitment agencies to find and transport workers from China to Singapore.

Mr. He, the driver who wrote the essay calling for drivers not to work, was recruited this way. He said he

came across an online advertisement that was part of the SMRT hiring drive in early 2011. He was living in

his backwater hometown of Qinyang, a city of 400,000 in Chinas central Henan province.

He said he paid 25,000 yuan (US$4,080) to recruitment agents in China and passed a battery of driving

tests before SMRT hired him. The job meant separation from his family for at least two years. But he

figured the promised payoff would make up for it.

According to Mr. He, recruitment agents promised prospective drivers monthly wages of about 2,000

Singapore dollars (US$1,560) after overtime, or up to 10,000 yuan. That was more than double his salary

as a truck and bus driver in China.

The terms of employment would become a central factor in the drivers dispute. Mr. He and others said that

their recruiters had made inflated promises about their wages and working conditions in Singapore.


6/26

SMRT declined to comment specifically on Mr. Hes account, but told The Wall Street Journal it has

reported the alleged misrepresentation by China-based agents to Singaporean and Chinese authorities for

further investigation. Efforts to determine the identity of the agents and contact them were unsuccessful.

I wanted to provide more for my family, especially for my child, now five years old, Mr. He said in a

telephone interview. It was also a chance for me to gain fresh experiences, seeing and learning new

things.

But Singapore also would hold some unpleasant surprises.

***

Chapter Two: Simmering Feud

For the hundreds of Chinese bus drivers who migrated to Singapore in recent years to take up jobs at local

transport companies, adjusting to the new surroundings was often harder than they expected. Many soon

felt they were being viewed with the resentment that has been growing against the influx of foreigners in

recent years.

Many Singaporeans say foreigners take jobs, push up property prices and add new strains to the

infrastructure, especially its crowded subways. There is also a deep cultural divide between Chinese

migrants and the local Chinese community, which comprised 74% of the resident population as of 2012.

Some Singaporean Chinese, themselves at least third- or fourth-generation immigrants from China, label

recently arrived mainlanders as country bumpkins for their perceived social idiosyncrasies and weak

grasp of English, Singapores lingua franca.

We often felt discriminated against, He Junling, one of the Chinese bus drivers, recalled in an interview.

Many of us had unpleasant encounters with ethnic Chinese Singaporeans, who looked down upon us

mainlanders.

To be sure, the problem isnt unique to Singapore. As thousands of Chinese nationals stream overseas

each year to find work, many have met with hostile reception from wary hosts.

Some 871,000 Chinese nationals were working abroad as of June, according to Chinas Commerce


7/26

Ministry. Many go to Southeast Asia, particularly places like Vietnam and Myanmar, where anti-mainlander

sentiment has swelled in recent years into fiery public rhetoric and even mass protests.

In Singapore, where public assembly is tightly regulated, many citizens express their anger online,

applying epithets like PRC scum and foreign trash to mainland migrants and asking them to return to

China.

But their increasingly strident and xenophobic tones have worried the government, political analysts say.

The government in the last three years has tried to assuage Singaporeans by handing them more socialbenefits compared to noncitizens, and slowing inflows of migrant labor. Prime Minister Lee last year urged

citizens to be more tolerant of foreigners.

In any case, few of the Chinese bus drivers in Singapore interacted with locals outside of work, preferring

to socialize within their small, close-knit cliques.

After working 10- to 12-hour shifts, six days a week for SMRT Corp., a state-owned Singapore transport

company, they spent most of their free time relaxing in dormitories tucked away in Singapores industrial

districts.

Facilities in the dormitories were basic, shared between hundreds, even thousands, of migrant workers of

various nationalities and industries.

Click to review the major players in this story.

Rooms usually housed eight people. Workers slept on double-decked bunks laid with thin mattresses and

straw mats, drivers recalled.

Some invested in cheap television sets and laptops for entertainment. Many busied themselves calling

family and chatting with co-workers over beer and cigarettes.

Occasionally, they treated themselves to a day out at a local park or mall. With most of their pay spent on

remittances, debt and daily necessities, they could afford little else.

Drivers said they frequently complained to supervisors about what they described as the cramped and

unhygienic conditions. As roommates often plied different shifts, they disrupted others sleep cycles,

leaving them perpetually lethargic. Illness spread quickly in the crowded spaces, drivers say.

In that environment, drivers say, resentment simmered over their pay and other terms of the job.

***

Before July 2012, SMRT paid mainland Chinese drivers all hired on two-year deals basic monthly

wages of S$1,000 (US$780), compared to about S$1,200 a month (US$940) of basic pay for Singaporean

and Malaysian drivers, who were permanent staff, according to SMRT statements.


8/26

Total compensation was more complicated, with Chinese drivers also receiving accommodation and utility-

bill subsidies worth about S$275 a month, though they also received lower bonuses than the Singaporean

and Malaysian workers, according to the SMRT statements.

Mr. He and several other mainland Chinese drivers say recruitment agencies hired by SMRT never made

it clear to them that they would be paid lower base salaries than other drivers. SMRT said it has reported

the alleged misrepresentation by agents to the relevant authorities. Efforts to identify and contact agents

were unsuccessful.

To the Chinese drivers, the different salary programs seemed unfair. They say they understood why

Singaporeans as citizens working in their own country received better terms, but questioned why

SMRT seemed to favor Malaysians over Chinese nationals.

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong

There are deep social and economic ties between Singapore and Malaysia, which facilitate cross-border

employment between the two former British colonies. Singapore was part of Malaysia from 1963 to 1965,

and in the years since, many Singaporean employers have taken to hiring Malaysians, who typically speakEnglish and assimilate easily given the cultural similarities.

About 400,000 Malaysians work in Singapore and many take up permanent residency in the city, a status

that carries perks including participation in a state-backed pension program. SMRT has not commented on

its hiring preferences but told The Wall Street Journal in an emailed response to questions that its

remuneration packagesincluding benefitsfor mainland Chinese and Malaysian drivers are equitable.

All this meant little to the Chinese drivers, who felt SMRT should treat all foreign staff equally.

The drivers, however, said they were reluctant to complain too much and risk their livelihoods. Many said

they had taken hefty loans to pay fees to recruitment agents to secure their jobs.

They say they also were afraid of retaliation based on the experience of Hu Xiuwen, one of the first

Chinese drivers to make the trip. The story of what he said he encountered circulated widely among the

drivers who followed.

Mr. Hu, a Qingdao native, joined SMRT in January 2008, he said in a telephone interview. He said SMRT

took possession of his passport once he landed, and placed him in an overcrowded state-built apartment

with six other drivers.

Mr. Hu said he did well at work, winning trust from supervisors, who would assign him additional shifts animportant income supplement. He said he was even picked to be a poster boy for SMRTs recruitment

drives in China.

The company eventually moved him and a co-worker to another apartment, he said.


9/26

But that apartment was also overcrowded, he said: A three-room affair that they shared with eight other

people two other foreign workers, the landlord and his family, and a housekeeper.

Hu Xiuwen

Worse still, Mr. Hu said, his room was infested with bedbugs, making it hard to sleep.

Mr. Hu said he sought help from a human-resources supervisor, but was rebuffed. According to Mr. Hu,the supervisor became agitated at the mere mention of the complaint and accused Mr. Hu of acting rudely.

The landlord and supervisor couldnt be reached for comment.

Days later, Mr. Hu was summoned to SMRT headquarters and dismissed without any explanation, he said.

The same day, he said, a repatriation company put him on a plane back to China.

SMRT hired Mr. Hu in January 2008 but dismissed him in September that year for unspecified disciplinary

reasons, the company said in response to queries from The Wall Street Journal. It declined to comment

on his allegations.

***

The fates of others who complained seemed to offer confirmation that dissent would not be tolerated,

drivers said.

In 2010, SMRTs early cohorts of mainland Chinese drivers were completing their two-year contracts.

Some left the company then. Others penned a petition, in Chinese, and collected about 185 signatures.

In the document, they accused SMRT of providing them with poor lodging conditions that werent

conducive for sufficient rest and left them lethargic, according to a copy of the petition reviewed by The

Wall Street Journal.

The drivers also in the petition demanded the company to return their passports, taken when the drivers

arrived in Singapore, and provide them with copies of the original contracts they had signed in China.

And the drivers complained in the petition that SMRT had refused to pay out annual bonuses. In interviews,

several drivers said they were owed bonuses worth one months salary about S$1,000 (US$780) for

each driver that should have been paid annually.

SMRT, however, told the drivers it would disburse all bonuses at the end of their two-year contracts, the

drivers recalled. SMRT declined to offer specific comment on the petition.


10/26

Click to v iew interactive

About 10 drivers hand-delivered the petition to the Ministry of Manpower housed in a somber white-tiled

building near the citys Chinatown district to explain their complaints to officials, according to two driversfamiliar with the petition. SMRT executives arrived within half an hour, seeking to intervene and defuse the

situation, drivers later recalled.

The Manpower Ministry later said in public statements that it had investigated and resolved the complaints

that fell within its jurisdiction, and discussed the remainder with senior SMRT management. Company

officials agreed to return the drivers passports and improve their bonus packages, drivers said.

Still, their other demands including on lodging conditions werent satisfactorily resolved, according to

some drivers.

And, they said, most of the 10 drivers who delivered the petition were dismissed. Drivers interviewed did

not know the exact number of those asked to leave, or precisely why SMRT dismissed them. SMRT

declined to comment.

***

Chapter Three: Confrontation

SMRT Corp., one of Singapores most prominent companies, has for more than two decades been a

standard bearer for the citys public-transport system. But in November 2012, when its

Chinese bus drivers refused to go to work one morning, it was seeking to restore its flagging reputation

among locals.

Set up in 1987 to launch the city-states subway, SMRT won global repute for seamless efficiency and

fuss-free urban travel.

The company became a private corporation in 2000, and Singapores state investment company Temasek

Holdings Pte. Ltd. sold more than a third of its 100% stake that year. Temasek now owns about 54% of

SMRT, according to Temasek and SMRT.

In the following years, SMRT expanded its interests into buses, taxis, convenience stores even mini-

malls in stations as it competed with ComfortDelGro Corp., the other major public-transport player in

Singapore.

But in December 2011, SMRTs standing took a major hit when SMRT-run subway lines suffered two

major breakdowns that left over 210,000 commuters temporarily stranded.


11/26

The disruptions were the worst in the networks history, prompting public outrage, criticism of the

companys wide-ranging interests, and a rare government inquiry a reflection of how seriously Singapore

takes its record of orderliness and efficiency.

Less than a month later, the companys chief executive resigned, saying she wanted to pursue personal

interests. In July 2012, the inquiry into the service disruptions said it found management and operational

shortcomings at SMRT and recommended broad remedies, but didnt assign culpability to any individual.

There is a need to position SMRT as principally an engineering and operations company, it said.

SMRT, then led by an interim CEO, accepted the inquirys findings and pledged to implement its

recommendations.

Desmond Kuek, a top bureaucrat at Singapores environment ministry and the former armed forces chief,

took over as the new chief executive in October 2012.

What is certain is that we are first and foremost a public-transport operator, Mr. Kuek said on his first day

in the job. This is the core business that we are responsible for and must excel in.

Agence France-Presse/Get ty Images

SMRT Corp. Chief Executive Desmond Kuek, pictured here in 2009 when he was chief of Singapores armed forces.

***

At the same time, however, tensions were mounting with SMRTs Chinese drivers.

In May 2012, the company announced that it would switch its bus drivers to a six-day work week from five

days. As part of changes that would take effect from July that year, the company raised basic monthly

salaries by between S$75 and S$250 (US$59 to US$156), following a deal hashed out with union leaders.

Mainland Chinese drivers received the smallest pay raise, S$75, bringing their base pay to S$1,075.Malaysian drivers pay rose S$150 to S$1,350.

Singaporean and Malaysian drivers turned to the National Transport Workers Union to push SMRT for

more favorable terms and got them. In October, SMRT upped the monthly pay raises it gave in July to

permanent bus-driving staff, boosting their wages by between S$175 and S$400 a month compared to pre-

July levels, according to SMRT statements and local media reports. The company also gave them an

option to return to a five-day work week, which many drivers had preferred.

Mainland Chinese drivers, however, didnt have the luxury of collective bargaining since they were contract

workers who werent permitted to be full union members. The improved salary terms announced in October

didnt apply to them, fueling what drivers say was a sense of grievance that they were being discriminated

against.

SMRT said in later public comments that it was within its legal rights to offer different base salaries and pay


12/26

raises. A collective-bargaining agreement between SMRT and the NTWU that established basic

employment terms only applied to locally engaged employees in the companys service and not to

temporary employees and contract employees, according to the agreement.

The company also said in response to queries from The Wall Street Journal that overall remuneration for

its mainland Chinese and Malaysian workers is equitable, after factoring in subsidies for transport,

lodging and utilities.

But what SMRT saw as lawful differences, Liu Xiangying felt was discrimination.

Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

Liu Xiangying

The native of Liaoning province in northern China came to work for SMRT after seeing a newspaper

advertisement in 2007, he said in a telephone interview. Having spent years driving buses in Inner

Mongolia, he said Singapores allure had proved compelling.

Singapore was a place I looked up to. Its an organized and orderly country with strong rule of law, the

33-year-old father of one said in the interview. I had hopes of bringing my wife and daughter over to settle

down.

He said he arrived in Singapore only to find that his contract didnt match what was promised him by therecruiters in China a common complaint among Chinese drivers. Mr. Liu said he complained to SMRT but

was met with noncommittal replies.

SMRT later said in response to queries from The Wall Street Journal that such complaints were passed on

to relevant authorities for investigation.

***

By November 2012, Mr. Liu said his frustrations had festered for nearly four years. After getting his pay

slip on Nov. 23, Mr. Liu said he met with two friends and co-workers who also were feeling disgruntled

during their time in Singapore: Gao Yueqiang and Wang Xianjie.


Gao Yueqiang

Mr. Gao, who was 32 years old at the time, said he was the sole breadwinner for his wife and son in

Liaoning province, according to court documents. Mr. Wang, a 39-year-old from Jilin province, had been


13/26

away from his teenage daughter for about five years, since joining SMRT in December 2007, according to

court documents.


Wang Xianjie

The trio knew each other from regular morning jogs. But when they met at that time to discuss their jobs,

the mood was grim.

Grievances against SMRT dominated their conversation, according to interviews with Messrs. Liu, Gao

and Wang.

The three men met again on Nov. 24 at the Sembawang God of Wealth temple, according to court

documents that were filed later in connection with the bus drivers strike.

The Taoist temple a four-floor building that is filled with golden idols and has a statue of the Chinese god

of wealth perched on its red-tiled roof is a popular place of worship for ethnic Chinese devotees. There,

the three men discussed ideas for how they could press SMRT to address their frustrations, according to

interviews with Messrs. Liu, Gao and Wang.

Their ideas included penning a letter to the chief executive, and filing petitions to the Manpower Ministry,

the Land Transport Authority and the Chinese embassy, the trio said.

Another idea that came up at the meeting was taking medical leave en masse, according to prosecutors

and court pleas submitted later by Messrs. Liu and Gao.

Later that day, Mr. Wang posted a message for SMRT drivers from China on an Internet messaging

platform known as QQ, which was operated by Chinas Tencent Holdings Ltd. He called on his colleagues

to take medical leave on Monday and Tuesday, Nov. 26 and 27.

Chun Han Wong/The Wall Street Journal

The Sembawang God of Wealth Temple, located in Singapores northernSembawang district.

Mr. Gao, meanwhile, said he took the idea to his roommate, He Junling, a fellow driver from central Henan

province. Spurred by his own frustrations with SMRT, Mr. He composed a lengthy essay addressed to his


14/26

colleagues, he said in an interview.

On Sunday, Nov. 25, Mr. He posted the Chinese piece on an Internet bulletin board run by Chinese

Internet firm Baidu, he said. Its title: The humiliation suffered by Singapore drivers (SMRT): Wheres the

dignity of mainland Chinese bus captains, according to copies seen by The Wall Street Journal.

Please relay the message to as many as possible, the essay stated. Most drivers socialized within

cliques of about 20 to 30 people.

Mr. He also published his essay on the QQ chat group formed by Chinese bus drivers at SMRT, but only

about 130 of them were active in the QQ group at the time it was posted.

At the Woodlands-district dormitory, where many of the Chinese drivers lived, Mr. He, along with Mr. Gao,

visited between 30 to 40 coworkers in nearby bunks to spread the word: The job action was on for the next

day.

Mr. He detailed online a plan of action for the walkout, according to court documents and archived QQ

messages. His message struck a chord.

Wake up early, gather in a large group at the dormitory gate, approach those who are boarding the shuttle

buses and explain to them the plan to strike, he wrote in a fresh QQ message published at 7:20 p.m. that

Sunday.

Dont waste money calling the scheduling department to take leave, just go straight to a clinic.

I have no right to force you to not work, but I have a duty to let you know of this plan, he wrote in the QQ

message viewed by The Wall Street Journal. We are doing this for the well-being and dignity of us

Chinese people.

I support, many wrote in reply. Its time to fight back, another wrote.

***

In the strikes early hours on the morning of Monday, Nov. 26, participants harried each other for live

updates of the situation, posting unconfirmed reports.

Over the Internet and their mobile phones, some wondered which co-workers were participating, and how

many. How would SMRT respond, others asked.

What the heck, those in Ang Mo Kio have all gone to work, a driver wrote on the QQ group, according to

QQ chat transcripts provided by defense lawyers involved in a subsequent court case related to thestrike.Damned traitors, another driver wrote. Ang Mo Kio, a district in central Singapore, was where oneof SMRTs bus depots was located.

Haha! No one at Kranji [bus depot] went to work! another worker reported on the same QQ group.

Good on those in Woodlands. Dont be like the bunch of cowering turtles in Ang Mo Kio, a driver wrote in

the message forum. We have got to force a resolution out of this, and not give up halfway.

***

SMRT executives arrived at the Woodlands dormitory mid-morning seeking answers to why thecompanys Chinese drivers were refusing to work, according to the drivers and QQ chat logs.

Officials from the Ministry of Manpower soon followed, as did dozens of reporters, according to

prosecutors, and drivers.


15/26

Company officials proposed ferrying the drivers to an SMRT facility in central Singapore with an auditorium

large enough to hold all the protesters, drivers said. Many drivers agreed, they said. Still in their uniforms,

they awaited the transport.

By going on a wildcat strike the drivers had already committed a technical offense, which carries penalties

of a jail sentence of up to a year or a fine of up to S$2,000, or both. But several said they didnt know that at

the time.

Dont be afraid! The law wont punish mass actions, a driver wrote in the QQ group.

Soon after, officers from the Police Tactical Unit a paramilitary riot-control force arrived at the scene in

their trademark bright-red vehicles, according to drivers and local media. The vehicles are known

colloquially as Ang Chia, or red car in the Hokkien dialect from Chinas southeastern Fujian province.

Many drivers said they were spooked by their arrival, so they dispersed and returned to their rooms,

scrubbing plans for the offsite talks.

SMRT officials then proposed a 3 p.m. meeting in the dormitory courtyard, a space they thought would be

big enough to hold everyone, according to Mr. He, the driver from Henan who penned an online essay

encouraging the strike. But that plan was washed out by rain showers.

Just before 4 p.m., SMRT started ushering drivers into the dormitorys security office, according to Mr. He.

About 40 to 50 workers squeezed inside. Others waited outside, Mr. He recalled.

Kang Huey Ling, then vice president of SMRTs bus operations, led the meeting, flanked by her

colleagues, Mr. He said. Manpower Ministry officials, policemen and recruitment agency staff also lined the

walls, according to prosecutors and Mr. He.

The room was teeming but the mood was calm, Mr. He recalled.

What you have done today is inappropriate, Ms. Kang said in Mandarin, according to Mr. Hes and

prosecutors accounts. There are internal channels that you can use to voice concerns to us.

If those channels had worked, we wouldnt have chosen to do what we have done, replied a driver,

according to Mr. He. We felt that we had no other choice.

A ministry official reminded the drivers that protesting was an inappropriate way of airing grievances,

according to prosecutors and Mr. He.

The drivers took turns to speak, pressing for equal treatment with Malaysian drivers and better lodgings,Mr. He said.

Ms. Kang assured drivers that they would get a raise of S$25 a month, according to Mr. He and SMRT

public statements after the meeting. She asked for a week to consider the other concerns, according to Mr.

He and SMRT.

Drivers say the meeting was the first time they had heard of the S$25 raise, though SMRT later said in

public statements that it had already decided to give the increase before the strike and had been planning

to inform the drivers.

A driver asked the others present if they were agreeable to the offer, but got a lukewarm response, Mr. He

recalled later.

Another driver, Bao Fengshan, warned that another strike could occur if SMRT didnt meet the drivers

demands within a week, according to court documents filed later in a case related to the strike.


16/26

Theres only about 40 to 50 drivers here now, and there are more than a hundred others who arent here

and dont know what was discussed, Mr. He asked, he recalled later. What about them?

If they have any further concerns, they can communicate with us through internal company channels,

Ms. Kang replied, according to Mr. He.

With that, the SMRT executives seemed to think that they had a deal, Mr. He recalled. They closed the

meeting at about 6 p.m. In response to queries from The Wall Street Journal, SMRT neither confirmed nor

denied the drivers characterization of events before and during the meeting, but said that they were based

on claims made by the bus captains. Efforts to reach Ms. Kang directly were unsuccessful.

Later that night, the company issued a statement saying executives had persuaded the drivers to return to

work.

We regret that they chose to express their unhappiness about their salaries in this manner, especially

when our lines of communication with them are always open, SMRT said.

The company apologized to the public for the inconvenience caused and added that the drivers will be

returning to work tomorrow.

It spoke too soon.

***

Chapter Four: Counterpunch

Wang Yong, a Chinese bus driver working for Singaporean transport operator SMRT, said he faced a

hostile reception when he returned to his dormitory the evening of Monday, Nov. 26, weary after a lengthy

shift behind the wheel.

In an interview, the 40-year-old said he wondered: What have I done now?

Wang Yong

The strike put bus driver Wang Yong in a quandary

For him and some other mainland Chinese SMRT drivers living at a dormitory in the Serangoon district of

Singapore, a bus strike called by their colleagues living in a Woodlands-district workers dormitory that day

had seemed far removed.

News of the strike had reached Mr. Wang through Singaporean and Malaysian colleagues at work, he

said, but he hadnt given it much thought.

Those who went to work today arent human! They arent fit to be Chinese nationals, one of his co-

workers bellowed, Mr. Wang recalled later in an interview.


17/26

Less than six months into the job, Mr. Wang said he wasnt inclined to risk his livelihood by joining the

action.

He said he arrived in June 2012 from Chengdu capital of Chinas southwestern Sichuan province lured

by the prospect of earning more to help provide for his wife and 13-year-old son. Mr. Wang, who also drove

buses back home, said he was a long way from recouping the 26,300 yuan (US$4,300) he said he had

paid to recruitment agents.

Unlike those who had worked in Singapore for years, I hadnt recovered my initial capital. I wasnt keen onmaking trouble, he said.

His co-workers who had stayed away from work that day tried to persuade him to join the cause, which

entailed applying for medical leave en masse to skip work.

They reminded him about their grievances over accommodation and pay, he said.

It worked.

In the end, we didnt think the consequences would be too severe, Mr. Wang said. We felt, since so

many people were in the protest together, the company would be forced to start serious dialogue with us.

The next morning, he and four friends headed straight to a clinic, he said. Mr. Wang said he told the doctor

he suffered from sore hips a real issue but one that he said he had worked through in the past. The

doctor prescribed some medication, and signed a chit for a days rest, he said.

His supervisor didnt seem bothered when he called Mr. Wang, according to Mr. Wang. Sure thing, dont

worry about it, Mr. Wang recalled him saying. SMRT declined comment.

***

Associated Press

SMRT bus drivers head to work on Nov. 27.

On Tuesday, Nov. 27, the morning that followed the first day of the strike, SMRTs shuttle buses left the

Woodlands-district dormitory with over a dozen drivers, down from the usual 70 or 80, according to He

Junling, a driver from Chinas Henan province who had encouraged drivers not to go to work.

Some 112 mainland Chinese drivers from across Singapore, assigned to morning and afternoon shifts,

didnt show for work that day, according to statements later made by prosecutors. Some were holding out

from Monday, but others, like Mr. Wang, were striking for the first time.

SMRT officials again scurried to the scene at the Woodlands dormitory, according to drivers and a Wall

Street Journal reporter present at the scene.

This time, officials from the transport-workers union and the Chinese embassy joined them, hoping to talk


18/26

the drivers into ending their strike, according to a public statement issued by the embassy. A police posse

kept watch outside, as did a gaggle of reporters.

Many of the drivers remained indoors to avoid the media scrum. But a handful emerged, stopping by the

adjoining food center for meals.

Were not asking to be treated in the same way as Singaporeans. We understand why the locals should

be better-paid, one of the drivers said to the dozen reporters who swarmed his table. We only want to be

treated the same way as the Malaysian drivers are.

Reporters asked the driver, a man in his thirties who said he had a wife and an 11-year-old son back home

in Jiangsu province, if he feared arrest for not working.

I didnt beat up or kill anyone. I didnt do anything illegal, he replied. Im merely exercising my right to

rest.

This time, however, SMRT didnt attempt to negotiate a settlement, according to Mr. He, the driver from

Henan province who had penned an essay online encouraging the strike.

They seemed to have made up their minds. They wanted us to be handled by the law, he said.

SMRT declined to comment on whether its officials held any formal meeting with the drivers who missed

work on Tuesday.

***

Surveys by local media found few commuters had actually been affected by the walkout. Officials later

said SMRT maintained more than 90% of normal services during the strike.

But the strike split opinion among Singaporeans.

Bloomberg

Singapores skyline

For some, it was an affront to the rule of law and public order so prized by Singaporean authorities. To

others, it highlighted Singapores over-reliance on foreign labor and served as a reminder of the publics

lack of concern for migrant workers.

The government should take these PRC [Peoples Republic of China nationals] to task for striking. They

have no respect for the local law and think this is China, a reader wrote in comments on the Straits Times

newspapers website. This kind of incident will happen again if no action is taken against them.

In a poll conducted by government feedback website Reach, about 78% of 313 respondents said they

agreed that any mainland Chinese driver found to have committed offences by going on strike should be

punished to the full extent of the law.

Others were more forgiving. Labor activists argued in media commentaries and online forums that SMRT

and the government should shoulder some blame for allowing tensions to fester.


19/26

The strike raised questions on whether [the workers] have a proper channel to seek redress when they

feel discriminated at the workplace, an unemployment counselor wrote in a letter to the Straits Times.

About 90% of foreign workers in Singapore arent union members. In recent years, some of them have

resorted to protests against alleged exploitation by employers, including a sit-in by Bangladeshi

construction workers in February 2012 over what they said were unpaid salaries.

Officials quickly intervened in many of these cases, including the February 2012 incident, and reprimanded

employers found to have mistreated workers. But authorities downplayed these episodes as labor

disputes, never describing them as strikes.

***

On Tuesday evening, Kang Huey Ling, then SMRTs vice president of bus operations, paid a visit to the

Police Cantonment Complex, home to the Singapore polices Criminal Investigation Department, according

to prosecutors later statements.

At about 6:48 p.m., she was received by an officer and filed a complaint against the striking drivers,

alleging their protest was illegal, prosecutors statements said.

Later that evening, Singapores Manpower and Transport ministries summoned local news media to a

briefing.

These workers have disrupted public transport services and Singapores industrial harmony. The

government views these disruptions very seriously, Acting Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin said at the

briefing.

He added that the ministry understands the bus drivers grievances. Still, he said, There are right ways

and wrong ways to handle these concerns This illegal strike is not acceptable and would be dealt with in

accordance to the law.

For the first time, Singaporean authorities had described the unfolding episode as a strike, a label that

SMRT and media had also avoided using until then. Using the term prepared the way for the government to

enforce laws against work stoppages it deemed illegal.

***

Police moved in the next morning, hauling about 20 mainland Chinese drivers into the Police Cantonment

Complex for questioning, according to drivers. Almost all other drivers returned to their jobs, save for six of

them later deemed by SMRT to have had valid reasons for missing work.

Investigators quickly identified who they believed to be the leading figures behind the strike: He Junling, the

writer of an essay encouraging drivers to miss work; and Liu Xiangying, Gao Yueqiang and Wang Xianjie,

the three men accused of helping to hatch the idea for the incident. They were arrested.

What happened next to Messrs. He and Liu remains contested.

According to the two men, police investigators punched them when they in separate interrogations in

different rooms answered that they didnt know each other. The two drivers said they only became

acquainted after their arrests.

Mr. He said that his interrogator punched him once in the stomach, while Mr. Liu accused an officer of

hitting him a few times on the torso. According to Mr. Liu, his interrogator told him: Do you know I could dig

a hole and have you buried in it, and no one would be able to find you?


20/26

Singapores Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of Manpower said in ajoint April 20 statement that

Messrs. He and Lius statements were baseless.

Internal police investigations into the claims didnt uncover any wrongdoing, according to the Home Affairs

ministry.

We take allegations of police abuse very seriously, especially when they are formally lodged, and

investigate them thoroughly, Deputy Prime Minister and Home Affairs Minister Teo Chee Hean said in the

statement. In this case, the investigations have vindicated the officers in this case and protected their

reputations.

Messrs. He and Liu later declined to pursue the matter, a decision that Singapore authorities said meant

the drivers were retracting their allegations.

The two men, in interviews with The Wall Street Journal, maintained their claims and said they had decided

not to pursue the matter only because they didnt want to prolong their stay in Singapore to the detriment of

their families, as both men were sole breadwinners.

Mr. He, in a separate statement he issued after returning to China, said he thought it would be difficult to

pursue the matter, given the lack of witnesses and video recordings of the interrogation.

In anApril 26 statement, the Home Affairs and Manpower Ministries said that Mr. Hes statement was

reckless and unfounded.

Either he makes a police report and substantiates his allegation with evidence or the allegations must be

regarded as unfounded and spurious, the ministries said.

***

Chapter Five: The Gavel Falls

On Thursday, Nov. 29, two days after a strike by Chinese bus drivers captured public attention in

Singapore, prosecutors charged four men He Junling, Liu Xiangying, Gao Yueqiang and Wang Xianjie

with engaging in a conspiracy to instigate others to participate in a strike.

Mr. He faced an additional count of incitement, related to an Internet essay he wrote to spur on his co-

workers.

At least an additional 50 drivers were picked up on that day for questioning, according to drivers who were

part of that investigation. Police released them within hours, according to the drivers. Police have not

commented on the drivers specific accounts.

Police detained a fifth man a day later. Bao Fengshan, a 38-year-old who joined joined Singaporean

transport operator SMRT Corp. in 2008, was charged with participating in the strike.

Prosecutors said in a court submission that he made threatening comments during a meeting with SMRT

officials on the first day of the strike. Prosecutors said he suggested that a further strike might happen if

the drivers demands werent met within a week.

He later pleaded guilty without engaging a lawyer, was sentenced to six weeks in jail, and then returned to

China, according to court documents. He could not be located.

By then, the drama in Singapore had caught the attention of Beijing. In a statement, Chinas Commerce

Ministry said it hoped all relevant parties can treat the requests of the Chinese drivers fairly, respond to

their requests actively and take care of them reasonably to defend [their] legitimate rights.


21/26

***

As public debate over the strike intensified, the Singapore government pressed SMRT to address its

drivers grievances.

But it also stressed that the protesters could have sought help through official channels, noting that many

of their recent objectionssuch as perceived discriminationhadnt been reported to the authorities prior

to the strike.

In the days after the strike, SMRT executives started visiting the mainland Chinese drivers, promising to

review their salary requests and address theirconcerns over lodging, according to SMRT statements at

the time.

Contractors were brought in to repair defects and broken fittings in the dormitories, while pest-control firms

arrived to kill bedbugs, according to SMRT statements. Alternative accommodations were arranged for

drivers who asked to move out of their current quarters, the statements said.

SMRT Chief Executive Desmond Kuek, who was on holiday in the U.S. when the strike occurred, also met

personally with drivers from China after the strike ended. He assured them of a S$25-per-month

(US$19.50) wage increase, backdated to July, that would bring their monthly pay to S$1,100 (US$859),

which SMRT said it had already planned to implement in December.

But he told the drivers that no pay raise beyond that would be made, according to a transcript of his

comments provided by SMRT.

Mr. Kuek and other SMRT officials explained that the company was paying the Chinese drivers lower

basic salaries than their Malaysian colleagues to make up for the costs of subsidizing accommodation for

the mainland Chinese drivers, according to SMRT statements.

It is unfortunate that this incident has happened, Mr. Kuek said in a Nov. 30 statement.

It shows that more needs to be done by management to proactively manage and engage the drivers.

Even as SMRT mopped up the strikes aftermath, the government was preparing a response of its own.

***

Wang Yong

The strike put bus driver Wang Yong in a quandary.

Wang Yong, a driver at the Serangoon-district workers complex, said he and other workers returned to

their jobs on Wednesday, his backing of the strike cooled by the governments tough rhetoric.

He spent several hours on Thursday speaking to police investigators, he recalled later, cooperating with


22/26

their queries and arguing that he had received legitimate medical leave.

That, he hoped, would be the end of it.

In the wee hours of Saturday morning, after Mr. Wang pulled a late-night shift, his supervisor rang him up,

he said in an interview.

The police need you to go back for further investigation, the supervisor said, Mr. Wang recalled. Theyll

pick you up in the morning.

He said he roused before 8 a.m., had breakfast and waited.

An SMRT bus arrived soon after, he said. The vehicle meandered through the streets then took an

unfamiliar route, making Mr. Wang nervous, he said.

The bus pulled up at Admiralty West Prison, a remote facility near Singapores northern coastline,

according to Mr. Wang, as well as another driver.

Other vehicles also arrived, ferrying drivers from the Woodlands-district dormitory. Dozens of police and

immigration officers awaited the 29 drivers who were brought in, the drivers said.


An SMRT bus leaves the Admiralty West prison after taking mainlandChinese bus drivers to the prison in Singapore on Dec. 1, 2012.

An official stepped forward. Were repatriating all of you back to China, Mr. Wang recalled him saying in

Mandarin.

The drivers insisted they didnt do anything wrong, according to some of the drivers present, including Mr.

Wang.

The official was unmoved, they said.

Another driver came forward. Tell me. What offense have I committed? he asked, Mr. Wang recalled.

The official said the drivers had committed an offense by participating in the strike, and that repatriation

was the penalty, according to Mr. Wang and another driver.

The decision has been made, the official said firmly, according to Mr. Wang. There is no room for

negotiation.

Government officers proceeded to revoke the mens work permits and driving licenses, and booked them

on flights to their home provinces in China, according to drivers present and a government statement

issued that day, Dec. 1.

SMRT officials terminated the drivers contracts and made arrangements to settle outstanding salaries,


23/26

according to an SMRT statement and drivers.

You are being issued a warning, but none of you will be charged, a police officer told Mr. Wang, according

to the driver.

The 29 drivers were made to change into prison garb and ushered into cells, where they were given dinner,

according to drivers.

They had no access to lawyers and were barred from making phone calls, drivers said. But they wereallowed to speak to visiting Chinese embassy officials.

Some drivers were shouting continuously from their cells, hurling abuse, Mr. Wang recalled. But I

realized it was pointless. The Singapore government had made up its mind, and we couldnt do anything

about it.

Under Singapore labor regulations, authorities have the right to revoke foreigners work permits and deport

them if they violate local laws and certain employment conditions.

All 29 drivers were dispatched for home late Saturday night and early Sunday morning, according to a

government statement.

SMRT did not comment on the specifics of how the deportation was handled.

In a joint Dec. 1 statement, the Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Manpower said the 29 drivers had

disrupted our public transport which is an essential service, and posed a threat to public order. They

were blatant and persistent in their unlawful acts, the ministries said.

***

The men accused of being the strikes ringleaders, meanwhile, faced trial in Singapores justice system.

On Dec. 6, He Junling, Liu Xiangying, Gao Yueqiang and Wang Xianjie were brought back to court.

According to Mr. He and Mr. Liu, police investigators had tried to discourage them from engaging lawyers,

saying such a move could result in heavier punishment than if they pleaded guilty immediately. The police

didnt respond to queries about this claim.

The drivers told the court they wanted to engage lawyers, and the judge set bail at S$10,000 each for

Messrs. Liu, Gao and Wang, and S$20,000 for Mr. He, according to defense lawyers and prosecutors.

Activists and migrant-worker advocacy groups helped the four men post bail and provided them with meals

and accommodation, according to drivers and activists involved.

Support also came from as far afield as Hong Kong, where local unionists staged a protest, calling on

Singaporean authorities to drop charges against the drivers, according to a statement from the unionists

and media reports in the Straits Times and other publications.

In February, the four men decided to take the case to trial, rejecting an offer from prosecutors to amend

their charges from instigating the strike to mere participation in return for guilty pleas, according to state

prosecutors, defense lawyers and Messrs. He and Liu.

Although both offenses were punishable by up to a year in jail and a $2,000 fine, participation is typicallyconsidered to be a lesser crime than instigating a strike.

But as the process wore on, the men changed their minds, according to Messrs. He and Liu, as well as

lawyers representing Messrs. Gao and Wang.


24/26

All of us also have families back home to feed, said Mr. He in an interview, adding that the men didnt

want to make matters difficult for some colleagues who were still being asked to assist police

investigations. So we decided to speed up the process, he said.

Mr. He told his lawyers that he would plead guilty in return for a seven-week jail term, while the others said

they would accept six weeks, Mr. He, defense lawyers and prosecutors said.

Messrs. He, Liu, Gao and Wang all pleaded guilty to instigating a strike when they reappeared in court on

Feb. 25, while Mr. He pleaded guilty to the additional charge of incitement.

Before sentencing, their lawyers asked the court to consider lighter sentences, according to court

documents.

It was never Jun Lings intention to startle or alarm the public, nor was it a calculated plan of his to unsettle

labor relations in Singapore for personal gain, Peter Low and Choo Zhengxi, counsels to Mr. He, wrote in

their court submissions.

His actions came from a place of deep desperation and despair at his living conditions, discriminatory pay,

and a lack of an outlet to express his grievances.

Mark Goh, the lawyer who represented Messrs. Liu and Gao, told the court that the drivers had chosen to

avoid work by taking medical leave, as opposed to an outright defiant refusal to go to work, according to

court submissions reviewed by The Wall Street Journal.

This showed that the men were still mindful and respectful of the parameters of their employment terms

and couldnt have planned to cripple the public-transport network, as their plan was dependent upon the

discretion of third-party doctors, Mr. Goh wrote in court submissions.

Prosecutors, however, in their court submissions pressed the judge to impose more than a mere fine or a

nominal imprisonment term.

Ministry of Manpower

Above, Singapores historical strike data from 1946 to 2009. In this chart, man-days lost refer to the total numberof working days lost annually due to industrial action. It is calculated by multiplying the duration of industrial actions(in days) with the number of workers that were affected.

The actions of the four accused persons played an undoubted part in precipitating a situation that had an

adverse impact on our public transport services, Francis Ng and Peggy Pao-Keerthi, both deputy public


25/26

prosecutors, said in their submission.

It is thus vital that a deterrent signal be sent to dissuade others from committing similar offenses to obtain

concessions from their employers, lest such conduct ultimately prove inimical to the well-being of the

public, they said.

Judge See Kee Oon sentenced Mr. He to seven weeks in jail. Messrs. Liu, Gao and Wang each received

a six-week sentence.

Neither SMRT nor the government commented on the sentencing.

***

After serving their sentences, all four drivers returned to China. In total, 34 drivers were deported for their

roles in the strike.

In the months since, some of them have secured new work while others were still searching when

contacted by The Wall Street Journal.

Several of the men said they were trying to put the past behind them, but the sting from their experienceslingered.

I do feel that I was treated unfairly, said Wang Yong, the driver who said he was deported even though he

only stayed away from work for one day. But I can understand why the Singapore government chose to

do what it did, acting quickly to discourage more labor unrest.

He has since found work as a machinist at a Chinese construction company in Angola.

What has happened has happened, its time to move on, He Junling, the writer of an online essay

encouraging the strike, said in an interview from his home in Henan province, where he found a new job in

what he described as a managerial-type role at a factory.

But Singapore, he said, could do more for its foreign labor, a group that he felt was underappreciated by its

hosts.

Migrant workers contribute so much to Singapores success, doing dirty and menial jobs that

Singaporeans dont want to do, Mr. He said. They deserve respect.

Still, for drivers that remained in Singapore and for new drivers who arrived since the work environment

has improved a bit as a result of what happened, according to SMRT statements and drivers who spoke to

The Wall Street Journal. In some ways, the protest worked.

Drivers hired from China on two-year contracts now receive the same performance incentives as drivers

of other nationalities, according to an SMRT statement. They also get a 13th-month bonus and a year-end

variable bonus. SMRT said it took steps to improve dormitory conditions, including moving some drivers to

better facilities and reorganizing work schedules to allow adequate rest.

The company also revamped its human-resources department, disciplined under-performing supervisors

and improved communication channels with its workers, it said.

The National Transport Workers Union has been actively encouraging foreign workers to become

members, an official at the unions parent entitythe National Trades Union Congresssaid in response

to questions from The Wall Street Journal.

The NTWU now counts about 86% of SMRTs mainland Chinese bus drivers or about 380 people as

associate members, though contract workers like those from China remain excluded from full membership


26/26

Copyright 2013 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights ReservedThis copy is for your personal, non-commercial use only. Distribution and use of this material are governed by ourSubscriber Agreement and

by copyright law. For non-personal use or to order multiple copies, please contact Dow Jones Reprints at 1-800-843-0008 or visitwww.djreprints.com

under the terms of the unions collective agreement with SMRT.

Associate members can seek union help to engage management on workplace grievances, although they

remain excluded from collective-bargaining processes that determine pay and other working conditions.

On the governments part, the Manpower Ministry has pledged to step up protections for vulnerable

workers and encourage companies to improve mechanisms for handling employees grievances, Acting

Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin told Parliament in February.

No matter how we painstakingly manage industrial relations, problems will emerge and disputes will

occur, Prime Minister Lee said in his May Day speech, making his first public comments on the SMRT

strike.

The governments position is clear: We cannot tolerate any party taking illegal action, or deliberately

damaging our harmonious industrial relations, Mr. Lee said. This is the Singapore way we must

preserve this fine spirit.

THE END

Documents

The Wall Street Journal Singapore Bus Strike