32
The Value of Global Soil Information to the International Plant Nutrition Institute GSP/e-SOTER workshop March 20, 2012, Rome, Italy Terry Roberts, PhD President, IPNI Better Crops, Better Environment … through Science

The Value of Global Soil Information to the International Plant ......The Value of Global Soil Information to the International Plant Nutrition Institute GSP/e-SOTER workshop March

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • The Value of Global Soil Information to the International Plant Nutrition Institute

    GSP/e-SOTER workshop March 20, 2012, Rome, Italy

    Terry Roberts, PhD President, IPNI

    Better Crops, Better Environment … through Science

  • • IPNI is a not-for-profit, scientific organization supported by leading fertilizer manufacturers and industry associations

    •Our mission is to develop and promote scientific information about the responsible management of plant nutrition

    Better Crops, Better Environment … through Science

  • Eastern Europe and Central Asia

    Australia/New Zealand

    Middle East

    North America

    Northern Latin America Brazil

    China

    South Asia

    SE Asia

    Latin America Southern Cone

    IPNI … 30 scientists working 12 Program Areas

    Africa

    Mexico & Central America

  • Multiple issues/benefits of soils

    •Degraded soils, soil protection, sustainable soil management … impact food security, water resources, biodiversity, carbon sequestration

    •Of most concern to IPNI are those related to soil-plant relationships … soil fertility

  • Soil-plant relationships

    • Soil physical, chemical, and biological characteristics … support or limit productivity

    • Soil characteristics in relation to parent material affect soil nutrient supply and other factors impacting crop production

    • Accurate information about the distribution and variability of soil properties, at the proper scale is needed to optimize inputs

  • IPNI uses global soil information to facilitate the management of plant nutrients

    • To make better general and site-specific nutrient management decisions

    • To identify areas of poor or excessive soil fertility

    • To better understand and manage soil variability

    • To link soil information to decision support tools

  • Applied soil fertility … soil testing, calibration and fertilizer recommendations

  • Median soil test K levels in 2010.

  • Percent of samples testing below critical levels for K for major crops in 2010.

  • Relationship between soil test K and relative soybean yield and soil test K and K2O rate (Arkansas)

    What happens when soil testing and calibration trials are not available?

  • Supply of nutrients from the soil can estimated using omission plot techniques.

    • Small plots where each of the nutrients being evaluated is omitted, while all the other nutrients are adequately supplied

    •Use the agronomic efficiency (AE) from omission plots to determine fertilizer rates in similar soils

    • AE= Y-Y0/F

  • Example: calculating fertilizer rates from omission plots in winter wheat from India

    Treatment Yield, kg/ha

    1. Ample rates of N, P, and K 5,556

    2. N omitted; ample rates of P and K 1,667 N rate= 150 kg/ha

    AE = (5,556 – 1,667)/150 = 26 kg of grain/kg of N

    If the target yield was 4,500 kg/ha: Calculated N rate = (4,500 – 1,667)/26 = 109 kg/ha

    IPNI unpublished data, 2011

  • Site-specific nutrient management (SSNM)

    • Set of nutrient management principles used to make field-specific decisions on N, P, and K management tailored to a specific field or growing environment. It aims to:

    – account for indigenous nutrient sources, including crop residues and manures

    – apply fertilizer at optimum rates and at critical growth stages to meet the deficit between nutrient need and indigenous supply

    •Originally developed for rice in Asia by IRRI and now successfully adapted for maize and wheat

  • Generic principles of SSNM for calculating fertilizer requirements

  • Challenge with SSNM …

    •Mainly a research tool … little adoption by farmers beyond on-farm trials. Farmers rely on extension for nutrient management guidance

    • Extension agents lack confidence in using the methodology and many perceive SSNM as too complicated

    •Decision support tools make the use of SSNM easy … e.g. IRRI’s Nutrient Manager for Rice

    Source: http://webapps.irri.org/nm/nmtutorial/

  • Decision support tools help advisers develop fertilizer recommendations for a specific field or growing environment

    • IPNI has developed simple software based on the principles of SSNM to help advisers develop fertilizer recommendations for a specific field or growing environment

    Source: http://seap.ipni.net/articles/SEAP0059-EN

  • Nutrient Expert follows principles of the QUEFTS model in using the relationship between the uptake of nutrients at harvest and grain yield to develop NPK requirements

    http://seap.ipni.net/articles/SEAP0059-EN

  • Nutrient Expert for Hybrid Maize: SSNM Rates • In the absence of data from nutrient omission plots, NE

    estimates attainable yield and yield responses to N, P, and K based on climate and soil properties, i.e. soil fertility indicators

  • NE decision rules for use of proxy information to estimate SSNM parameters

    SSNM parameter Proxy information

    Attainable yield

    • Characteristics of the growing environment (water availability, risk of flood/drought, soil depth, problem soils)

    • Maximum attainable yield (Ymax) – based on experts’ experience or crop modelling

    • Farmers’ actual yield Yield response

    • Soil fertility indicators: soil texture, soil color/OM content, historical use of organics, soil test for P/K (if any; not required)

    • Nutrient balance (P and K) from previous crop (affected by nutrient inputs, crop residue management, irrigation water for K)

  • NE decision rule: estimate attainable yield

    1. Determine the maximum attainable yield (Ymax) for the region, province, or domain • what can be attained with BMPs, considering climate and soil

    constraints • from local experts’ experience or crop modeling of yield potential

    2. Estimate attainable yield (Ya) for a location depending on the growing environment and the current yield of the farmer (Y) • Growing environment: low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk —

    depending on presence or lack of risks (i.e. drought, flooding, problem soils, etc)

  • NE decision rule: estimate yield response to fertilizer

    Soil fertility class Characteristics

    low sandy soil regardless of soil color, or clayey or loamy and reddish/yellowish

    medium clayey or loamy and grayish/brownish

    high clayey or loamy and very dark soil with high OM and high fertility

    Assessment of soil fertility class

  • NE decision rule: estimate yield response to fertilizer

    Observations and assumptions • The nutrient-limited yield (i.e. Y0N, Y0P, Y0K) is a fraction of the

    attainable yield (Ya). • For a specific field or location, nutrient-limited yield follows the

    same trend as Ya, which depends on the climate. • Under the same climatic condition, the indigenous nutrient

    supply (soil fertility) will determine the nutrient-limited yield. The indigenous nutrient supply (INS, IPS, IKS) will determine the ratio of nutrient-limited yield to attainable yield (i.e. Y0N/Ya, Y0P/Ya, Y0K/Ya).

  • NE decision rule: estimate yield response to fertilizer

    • For a given attainable yield (Ya) and soil fertility class, NE estimates N-limited yield (Y0N) from ‘Y0N/Ya’. It assumes that: – the median represents soils with

    average fertility or indigenous N supply (INS)

    – the 25th percentile represents low INS – the 75th percentile represents high INS

    • N response = Ya * N response factor N response factor = 1– ‘Y0N/Ya’ (for the

    INS level) Grain yield with NPK (t/ha)

    0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14G

    rain

    yie

    ld w

    ithou

    t fer

    tiliz

    er N

    (t/h

    a)0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14ChinaS. Asia

    25th

    median

    75th

    L M

    H

    • NE determines the indigenous N supply class (low, medium, high) from soil characteristics (texture, soil color and/or organic matter content)

    Source: IPNI data (unpublished)

    N response based on INS class

  • Spatially variable soil fertility in North Vietnam and its implications for fertilizer needs

    • Soil survey on more than 100,000 ha of degraded soil with intensive rice and maize cultivation in North Vietnam revealed potential large-scale nutrient stresses

    – Area of small farms (0.3 ha) with large field-to-field variability in terms of crops, cropping practices, fertilizer use, and soil fertility status

    • Permanent variability in soil properties in relation to parent material affecting soil nutrient supply and factors relevant to crop production

    Source: Witt et al. 2007

  • Objective of survey: Assess spatial variability of soil properties that (i) affect general soil fertility for rice and maize and (ii) soil indigenous supply of nutrients

    Location of degraded soils (blue) and study sites (red)

    • Red River Delta in Vietnam has about 132,000 ha of degraded soils of light or gray color

    - characterized as low fertility because of parent material and nutrient losses from leaching and intensive cropping

    • Base samples on 1 x 1 km grid (100 ha) with additional transects giving spatial support of 100 x 100 m (1 ha) to model short-distance spatial variability

  • Survey results … • Correlation analysis indicated weak relationships between

    easily measured soil parameters (e.g. elevation and texture) and those related to nutrient status like organic matter or exchangeable bases … mapped soil parameters individually

    Soil pH in degraded soil of North Vietnam. Interpolation by kriging.

  • Spatially variable soil fertility in North Vietnam and its implications for fertilizer needs

    • More systematic research on spatial variability is needed in small-scale rice, wheat, and maize in Asia is needed to improve SSNM recommendations.

    • Reliance on old soil maps to help delineation of borderlines for fertilizer recommendations are problematic, because they were not developed for agronomic purposes.

  • Would global soil information facilitate the transfer nutrient management information from one location in the world to another?

    Example:

    • IPNI’s SE Asia program has successfully developed a system of sustainable agronomic BMPs at commercial oil palm plantations in degraded land environments in South Asia that have increased yields by 25%

    • We are developing an Alliance for Ecological Oil Palm Intensification to try an adapt BMPs developed in Southeast Asia to elsewhere in the world.

  • Global soil information would aid the transfer of nutrient management information from one location in the world to another.

    Homologue Evaluation of Environments (climate) Oil Palm in SE-Asia

    This data is based on climate only, and would benefit from a soils overlay.

  • Global soil information … often outdated and inadequate

    • Better linkage of global soil information to decision support tools …

    •Need to extrapolate soil information to: – yield gap analysis and target yields: assess nutrient limited

    yields and develop target from soil information

    – Integrate risk from soil degradation, soil acidity, salinity, nutrient depletion, excessive nutrient loading, etc.

    – Incorporate spatial soil information’s impact on nutrients and nutrient supply

  • www.ipni.net

    Better Crops, Better Environment … through Science

    The Value of Global Soil Information to the International Plant Nutrition InstituteSlide Number 2IPNI … 30 scientists working 12 Program AreasMultiple issues/benefits of soilsSoil-plant relationshipsIPNI uses global soil information to facilitate the management of plant nutrients Applied soil fertility … soil testing, calibration and fertilizer recommendationsMedian soil test K levels in 2010.Percent of samples testing below critical levels for K for major crops in 2010.Relationship between soil test K and relative soybean yield and soil test K and K2O rate (Arkansas)Supply of nutrients from the soil can estimated using omission plot techniques.Example: calculating fertilizer rates from omission plots in winter wheat from IndiaSite-specific nutrient management (SSNM)Generic principles of SSNM for calculating fertilizer requirementsChallenge with SSNM …Decision support tools help advisers develop fertilizer recommendations for a specific field or growing environmentNutrient Expert follows principles of the QUEFTS model in using the relationship between the uptake of nutrients at harvest and grain yield to develop NPK requirementsSlide Number 18Nutrient Expert for Hybrid Maize: SSNM RatesNE decision rules for use of proxy information to estimate SSNM parametersNE decision rule: estimate attainable yieldNE decision rule: estimate yield response to fertilizerNE decision rule: estimate yield response to fertilizerNE decision rule: estimate yield response to fertilizerSpatially variable soil fertility in North Vietnam and its implications for fertilizer needsObjective of survey: Assess spatial variability of soil properties that (i) affect general soil fertility for rice and maize and (ii) soil indigenous supply of nutrients�Survey results …Spatially variable soil fertility in North Vietnam and its implications for fertilizer needsWould global soil information facilitate the transfer nutrient management information from one location in the world to another?Global soil information would aid the transfer of nutrient management information from one location in the world to another.Global soil information … often outdated and inadequateSlide Number 32