Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Nor, The Use of Dialogue | 158
DOI 10.24235/eltecho.v%vi%i.2179
THE USE OF DIALOGUE JOURNALS ACTIVITY IN ESSAY
WRITING COURSE (STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT)
Hidayah Nor
UIN Antasari Banjarmasin
Abstract: This research is aimed to describe the use of dialogue journals
technique in improving students’ writing skill especially students’ achievement in
short essay writing course. The researcher used descriptive qualitative research
for conducting the research. The subjects of this research were the fifth semester
students of English Education Department academic year 2016-2017 and there
were two classes which involving 65 students. The instruments that were used to
get the data are the writing test in form of essay. It is considered valid based on
the view of test content and the representation of the materials tested since the test
uses content validity. Then, all the data were analyzed descriptive qualitatively
and concluded inductively. The result of this research was to provide English
lecturers with interesting and effective teaching strategies in enhancing the
students’ active participation in teaching and learning process and improving
students’ writing ability. The students were expected to use dialogue journals
activity to improve their ability in writing. This research also gave additional
value to the effort of increasing the quality of teaching English particularly
teaching writing in Indonesia.
Keywords: dialogue journals, teaching writing, essay writing course
BACKGROUND Writing is as an important skill in the EFL setting. It helps learners to acquire
English language because the activity stimulates thinking and facilitates them to develop
some language skills simultaneously. According to Bello (1997), writing, as a productive
language skill, plays an essential role in promoting language acquisition as learners’
experiment with words, sentences, and large chunks of writing to communicate their ideas
effectively and to reinforce the grammar and vocabulary they learn in class.
Based on the students’ point of view, writing is considered to be the most difficult
skill to master by them. This is not quite surprising due to the fact that while everybody
enjoys talking, not so many people consider writing as something enjoyable. White (1995,
p. iv) believes that the great rise in interest in spoken communication, characteristic of
the past 20 years, has challenged the status of writing. An ability to speak a foreign
language has then become a more highly rated skill than an ability to write in it.
Most ESL/EFL writing teachers would strongly believe with the statement that
teacher correction feedback is a necessary part of any writing course. Regarding language
use or grammar, most would also conclude that grammar correction is essential. A study
conducted by Cohen and Cavalcanti (1990) stated that teachers tend to focus more on the
use of mechanics (such as spelling, punctuation, capitalization, and paragraphing) and
159 | ELT-Echo, Volume 2, Number 2, November 2017
ISSN: 2579-8170 e-ISSN: 2549-5089
language use (such as tense, word order, articles, pronouns, and preposition) in their
students' piece of writing than on the content (such as knowledge of subject, substance,
and development of thesis) and organization (such as fluent expression, clear statement
of ideas, and logical sequencing).
However, Gray (2004), reports that previous research conducted in the last 20
years has revealed it to be wrong. Plentiful studies have also revealed that grammar
correction to second language writing students is actually discouraging to many students,
and even harmful to their writing ability.
A Journal is a record of one’ thought, feeling, experiences, usually in written form
as Prayogo (1997) stated that journal writing could provide an opportunity for the students
to express themselves through written forms. Students can express their feeling or
thoughts without the threat of their thoughts being judged later by the teacher.
Brown in his book Language Assessment (2010:134) mentioned seven types of
Journal writing:
a. Language-learning logs, in English language teaching, learning log have the
advantage of sensitizing students to the importance of getting their own goal and then
self-monitoring their achievement
b. Grammar journals, this is especially appropriate for courses and workshops that focus
on grammar.
c. Responses to readings, this type are simple responses to readings (and/or to other
material such as lectures, presentations, films, and videos).
d. Strategies based learning logs, this type is specialized journal that focus only on
strategies that learners are seeking to become aware of and to use their acquisition
process.
e. Self-assessment reflections, journals can be a stimulus for self-assessment in a more
open-ended way than through using checklist and questionnaires.
f. Diaries or attitudes, feelings, and other affective factors, teachers can thereby become
better equipped to effectively facilitate learners’ individual journeys toward their
goals.
g. Acculturation logs, is one that focuses of acculturation in a nonnative country.
A dialogue journal is an informal written conversation between student and
teacher which provides a meaningful writing activity. According to Fulwiler (2000),
journal writing is an important way of individualizing instruction and encouraging
independent thinking.
A dialogue journal, according to Peyton (1993), is a written conversation in which
a student and teacher communicate regularly (daily, weekly, etc., depending on the
educational setting) over a semester, school year, or course. Students write as much as
they choose and the teacher writes back regularly, responding to students' questions and
comments, introducing new topics, or asking questions. This kind of writing activity
makes this technique enjoyable and thus popular as a writing technique. It can be viewed
from the fact that many teachers as well as lecturers have already applied this technique
in their writing classes and lots of research studies have been carried out dealing with this
teaching technique.
To name a few, Erin Gruwell, an English teacher at Woodrow Wilson High School
in Long Beach, California, America as well as the founder of Freedom Writers
Foundation, for instance, writes in her memoir that her students are enhanced in their
writing ability after she utilizes this technique (Gruwell, 2007). In fact, Gruwell makes
an inference that a dialog journal is not only good at improving writing skill but it can
Nor, The Use of Dialogue | 160
DOI 10.24235/eltecho.v%vi%i.2179
also improve students' attitudes. In EFL/ESL context, Burton and Caroll (2001) say that
this technique has already been proved effective to promote the writing skill of EFL/ESL
students in some countries.
In line with Gruwell’s and Burton and Caroll’s findings, Walker (2006) finds that
journal writing assignments can benefit students by enhancing reflection, facilitating
critical thought, expressing feelings, and writing focused arguments. Journal writing can
be adapted into a student's clinical course to assist with bridging the gap between
classroom and clinical knowledge. In addition, journals can assist athletic training
students with exploring different options for handling daily experiences.
In addition, Burniske (1994) states that since the purpose of a dialogue journal is
to supply students with a real audience and enhance their rhetorical awareness, the teacher
would respond only to the content of the student's progress, not to grammatical and
mechanical errors in the writing; instead, the teacher would lead by example, modeling
grammatical and mechanical correctness in his/her own written responses.
In sum, dialogue journal is a written conversation that is aimed to supply students
with a real audience and develop their rhetorical awareness in which a student and teacher
communicate frequently over a semester, school year, or course.
Teaching Writing by using Journal Writing Strategy
Teaching writing by using journal writing strategy can be done by asking students
to make a journal. The students are asked to write anything what they want to write. The
teacher who received the students’ journal reads the entry and responds to it. This journal
is interactive and takes the form of a conversation Tompkins (2002) states that “Most
importantly, dialogue journals are an authentic writing activity and provide the
opportunity for real communication between the student and the teacher” (p.235)
Journal writing helps learners write better and better day by day since it provides
learners with more opportunities to freely write about what they wish to whenever they
feel like writing as Hamp and Heasley (2006) recommended:
“The most obvious way you can help yourself become a good writer is by
writing. We strongly suggest that in addition to completing the tasks, you also
keep your own personal journal. Buy yourself a notebook, and try to write down
some ideas every day, in English, about anything that interests you (…). You will
surprise yourself by producing pages and pages of writing.” (p.5)
The use of dialogue journals, on the other hand, can help students to destroy or, at
least, to reduce the existing difficulty in writing. When the students are given the freedom
to write anything they want and are told that the teacher is going to respond to their
journals individually, the atmosphere becomes less frightening. This will also lead to the
writing activity with a sense of purpose and a sense of audience (Peyton, 1993). In
addition, Burniske (1994) states that since the purpose of a dialogue journal is to supply
students with a real audience and enhance their rhetorical awareness, the teacher would
respond only to the content of the student's progress, not to grammatical and mechanical
errors in the writing; instead, the teacher would lead by example, modeling grammatical
and mechanical correctness in his/her own written responses.
The idea to carry out this study first struck when the researcher assessed the
students' pieces of writing in English Education Department. In this exam, students were
to write both narrative and descriptive texts. The researcher was startled to know that
161 | ELT-Echo, Volume 2, Number 2, November 2017
ISSN: 2579-8170 e-ISSN: 2549-5089
some of the students were not competent enough in doing the writing test, especially
dealing with a narrative text. These students got lower English writing scores than what
they were expected to achieve.
All of these facts brought about an assumption that the teaching of writing at
English Education Department needs improvement. To be more specific, it was essential
that teachers, including the researcher, need to get introduced to a new technique in
teaching writing and then apply the technique in the teaching and learning process. The
word 'new' here does not necessarily mean that it is up to date or current. As long as the
teachers never utilize the technique, it could also be categorized as 'new.' The technique
that at last comes into the researcher’s mind is dialog journals.
Hence, the research objectives of the research are to know the implementation of
dialogue journals activity in teaching writing for the fifth semester students of English
Education Department at UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. To know the students’ achievement
in essay writing course for the fifth semester students of English Education Department
at UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.
Theoretically, the result of this research is expected to give some more additional
theory related to the use of dialogue journals technique in teaching writing as viewed
from the students’ achievement in essay writing course. It can also change students’
perception that not all writing activity is boring or threatening, so that they can improve
their writing ability.
On the other hand, practically, the result of this research is precious in practical
contribution to the lecturers, teachers, students, and future researchers. It is expected to
provide the lecturers and teachers with new interesting teaching technique in improving
students’ competence in teaching and learning process. The students are expected to apply
dialogue journals to improve their ability in writing competence. For future researcher, it
is expected that this research can be a reference for those who want to conduct a research
on the similar field but in different skills.
METHOD
This research is a descriptive qualitative research. Qualitative Research is
primarily exploratory research. It is used to gain an understanding of underlying reasons,
opinions, and motivations. It provides insights into the problem or helps to develop ideas
or hypotheses for potential quantitative research. This research tries to explore the use of
dialogue journals activity in teaching writing as viewed from the students’ achievement
in essay writing course for the fifth semester students of English Education Department
at UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.
The population of this research is the fifth semester of English Education
Department Students academic year 2014 who took Essay Writing Course which consists
of four classes. The numbers of population are 135 students.
Considering the large number of students, the researcher applied simple random
sampling to be involved in this study. The writer took 65 students from two classes (Class
A and D) who involved in this research.
Research Instrument
In conducting this research, there are three instruments to be used as follows: First,
writing test by asking the students to write the short essay, in this research, the lecturer
asked the students to write various essays based on the syllabi. Second, Observation, by
observing the students and the lecturer in applying dialogue journal activities and
notebooks are used during the teaching and learning process of writing. Third,
Nor, The Use of Dialogue | 162
DOI 10.24235/eltecho.v%vi%i.2179
Documentation of the students’ final score when they have already finished the course at
the end of the semester.
Data Analysis
All the collected and processed data are analyzed descriptively and qualitatively.
Data analysis in a process by which data simplified into a form can be interpreted and
read easily.
FINDINGS
This part deals with the result of the research based on some facts found in the data.
It covers the use of dialogue journals activity in essay writing course as viewed from the
students’ achievement for the fifth semester students of English Education Department at
UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.
1. The implementation of dialogue journals activity in essay writing course for the
fifth semester students of English Education Department at UIN Antasari
Banjarmasin.
This research is involving 65 students of the fifth semester students who took
essay writing course. However, for the findings of the research, it was only focused on
the two examples of students’ essays in various forms to make the analysis clearer. The
students’ names are Asmariah and Nella Vicca.
Here is the sample of essay writing by Asmariah.
At The Museum
One day I was visited a museum in the country of south Kalimantan. There were
5 floors in the museum and the inside architecture reminded us of the imperial age. We
could see the top of the building from the ground floor. People from different age groups
and countries were closely observing the museum. Taking photo was prohibited;
moreover I was sometimes allured to take some hidden snaps especially when I saw the
colossal dinosaur fossil and alien ship!
The first floor of the museum had some art from famous artist of the world and
sculptures from different era. The first floor gave us the impression of visiting a theatre
or art gallery rather than museum. We came to know that some of the arts were so
expensive that one can buy an island by selling it! Then we moved to the second floor
which was full of Second World War memories. Guns, tanks and other materials from
1945 WW II had been arranged there. A video was showing some of the fighting scenes
of WW II.
When we reached third floor, it’s been already 2.5 hours. We found all the
costumers and traditional things from different parts of the world have been placed here.
One can easily learn about the customs of different ages and they were historically
famous. I felt like see the first computer, speed boat, wheel, Motor Engine and many more
famous inventions of history at this floor. In addition, I was so much dying to touch the
first for wheeler that had been placed there. I had the whole museum as much as possible
and spent almost the whole day. I was so enthralled to visit the place. Consequently, I
forgot to have lunch. To overall experience was fantastic and I learned so many things
in few hours. As soon I left the placed. I planned to revisit at home.
Here is the lecturer’s response toward the essay writing by Asmariah.
Your Descriptive essay writing is very good because you describe
the museum clearly so that the readers can imagine the museum looks like.
163 | ELT-Echo, Volume 2, Number 2, November 2017
ISSN: 2579-8170 e-ISSN: 2549-5089
However, there are some mistakes in terms of grammar and subject verb
agreement in writing and you have already checked and revised it. For the
words in bold, were the correct ones of your writing that we have already
discussed for revising.
Asmariah’s Response
Thank you so much for your suggestion and correction, and sure I would
revise it based on your notes and submitted to you as soon as I can.
Here is the sample of essay writing by Nella Vicca.
My Friend is Jamilah
Jamilah is one of my friends in A Class English 2014. She has short body, black
skin, she is very quite I think, she is very rarely spoke when in front of class or join
discussion with us in the classroom. She is very mediocre and not over powering in the
class. But I was suprised when I saw her study result card. She always get A+ in all
subjects.and I think no one knew in our class that fact, Including the fact she recived the
scholarship in the form of money 2 millions rupiah. May be she has mysterious
personality.
Here is the lecturer’s response toward the essay writing by Nella Vicca.
Your Descriptive essay writing is too short and did not include the
three components of essay (Introduction, Body, and Conclusion) and you
also still had grammar mistakes in writing and you should revise it based
on my notes and give more description about Jamilah in your writing as
clear as possible.
Nella’s Response
Thank you mom for your correction, I realized that my essay had
many weaknesses and of course I will revise I based on the notes and give
more explanation about the essay.
2. The students’ achievement in essay writing course for the fifth semester students
of English Education Department at UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.
The second research problem for this research is to know the students achievement
in short essay writing course after applying dialogue journals activity in the teaching and
learning process, and this is the results of students’ final course, and the researcher have
already categorized the students’ score from the lowest to the highest one as follows:
NO NAMA MAHASISWA NIM MID TUGAS FINAL NA BOBOT
1 MRS 1401240829 78.3 84 50 68.69 C+
2 SM 1201240764 62.5 60 73 65.95 C+
3 UM 1301240927 0 60 0 18 E
NO NAMA MAHASISWA NIM MID TUGAS FINAL NA BOBOT
1 AA 1401240795 69.2 73.5 70 70.81 B
2 AM 1401240801 72.9 75 73 73.57 B
3 MR 1401240817 72.5 73 75 73.65 B
4 MM 1401240825 73.5 74 75 74.25 B
Nor, The Use of Dialogue | 164
DOI 10.24235/eltecho.v%vi%i.2179
5 NPS 1401240770 73.7 76 70 72.91 B
6 PMC 1401241504 73.4 70 76 73.42 B
7 SH 1401240783 74.1 75 73 73.93 B
NO NAMA MAHASISWA NIM MID TUGAS FINAL NA BOBOT
1 AM 1401240800 81.7 78 74 77.51 B+
2 AMR 1401240802 77.2 78 80 78.56 B+
3 AR 1401240804 78.7 81 74 77.51 B+
4 AB 1401240805 76.9 75 80 77.57 B+
5 AMH 1401240806 78.1 82 75 78.03 B+
6 ADR 1401240809 75.9 85 73 77.47 B+
7 DM 1401241502 76 82 78 78.6 B+
8 FH 1401240724 75.7 80.5 76.54 77.48 B+
9 FF 1401240810 75.5 76 77 76.25 B+
10 KNB 1401240812 78.1 76 81 78.63 B+
11 MNA 1401240750 78 77 80 78.5 B+
12 MHR 1401240822 76.5 82 77 78.35 B+
13 MLA 1401240835 76.2 75 82 78.16 B+
14 MNZ 1401240826 75.7 83 76 78.01 B+
15 MZA 1401240834 80.5 80 77 78.95 B+
16 RF 1401240835 73.7 79 74 75.41 B+
17 RS 1401240836 73.2 80 82 78.76 B+
18 SFI 1401241503 73.7 75 84 78.21 B+
NO NAMA MAHASISWA NIM MID TUGAS FINAL NA BOBOT
1 ALD 1401240796 89.2 82.3 78 82.65 A
2 AMN 1401240712 83.2 85 82 83.26 A
3 AMH 1401240713 89 84 85 85.9 A
4 DA 1401240716 83 85 86 84.8 A
5 EP 1401240721 86.5 83 86 85.25 A
6 EZ 1401240723 87.5 82 84 84.45 A
7 HM 1401240812 76.7 83 82 80.71 A
8 HDI 1401240736 87 84 85 85.3 A
9 IA 1401240740 78.1 85 80 80.93 A
10 MAM 1401240819 86.9 78 80 81.47 A
11 MAH 1401240820 82 80 85 82.6 A
12 MR 1401240830 83 84 85 84.1 A
13 MN 1301240921 85.7 82 85 84.31 A
14 MMI 1401240756 79.2 81 85 82.06 A
15 NVA 1401240761 89 77 85 83.8 A
16 NI 1401240762 85.7 87.6 84.3 85.71 A
165 | ELT-Echo, Volume 2, Number 2, November 2017
ISSN: 2579-8170 e-ISSN: 2549-5089
17 NM 1401240766 83.7 83 85 84.01 A
18 NH 1401240768 78.1 85 87 83.73 A
19 NHD 1401240769 89 82 84 84.9 A
20 OE 1401240774 85.5 81.2 84 83.61 A
21 PSA 1401241505 83 82 86 83.9 A
22 SDH 1401240782 86.9 82 85 84.67 A
23 SER 1401240784 83.5 81 84 82.95 A
24 SU 1401240788 86.5 80 87 84.75 A
25 SRI 1401240789 86.5 80.7 87 84.96 A
26 SYD 1401240837 89 82 86 85.7 A
27 WK 1401240838 87 85 88 86.8 A
NO NAMA MAHASISWA NIM MID TUGAS FINAL NA BOBOT
1 END 1401240720 87.5 88.13 94.5 90.49 A+
2 FH 1401240726 87.8 92.8 93.4 91.54 A+
3 FDP 1401240730 93.2 90.76 87.8 90.31 A+
4 FRD 1401240811 89.2 88.6 92.7 90.42 A+
5 JM 1401240741 93.7 87.3 89.7 90.18 A+
6 MA 1401240751 86.5 93.8 94.6 91.93 A+
7 M 1401240753 87.5 91.4 94.3 91.39 A+
8 MDS 1401240754 88.1 91.5 90.5 90.08 A+
9 NRI 1401240760 88.7 94.55 88.54 90.39 A+
10 NH 1401240765 86.9 92 98 92.87 A+
Based on the tables above, it can be seen that the highest score (A+) is gotten by
10 students of short essay writing class, and there were 27 students who got A, and for
B+ has successfully achieved by 18 students. For the rest, there were 7 students who got
B and 2 students have C+, and 1 student are considered failed for this course because he
did not attend the middle test and final test, so that the lecturer gave him E score.
DISCUSSION
The researcher analyzed the written texts of the dialogue journals using a scheme
of language functions developed by Shuy (1993) for his study of dialogue journal
interactions in an ESL teaching context:
1. Reporting personal facts
2. Reporting general facts
3. Reporting opinions
4. Requesting personal information
5. Requesting academic information
6. Requesting general information
7. Requesting opinions
8. Requesting clarification
9. Thanking
10. Evaluating
11. Predicting
Nor, The Use of Dialogue | 166
DOI 10.24235/eltecho.v%vi%i.2179
12. Complaining
13. Apologizing
14. Giving directives
This is the finding of the research based on the theories of dialogue journals
language function, as follows:
Reporting personal facts
Jamilah is one of my friends in A Class English 2014.
Reporting general facts
There were 5 floors in the museum and the inside architecture
reminded us of the imperial age.
Reporting opinions
To overall experience was fantastic and I learned so many things in
few hours.
Requesting personal information
Give more description about Jamilah in your writing as clear as
possible.
Thanking
Thank you so much for your suggestion and correction
Evaluating
However, there are some mistakes in terms of grammar and subject
verb agreement in writing and you have already checked and revised
it.
Giving directives
For the red signs of the writing, were the correct ones of your writing that we have
already discussed for revising.
Based on the explanation above, the researcher found 7 categories of language function
of dialogue journal activities in writing, they are: (1) Reporting personal facts, (2)
Reporting general facts, (3) Reporting opinions, (4) Requesting personal information, (5)
Thanking, (6) Evaluating, (7) Giving directives.
As explained in the theoretical review, dialogue journal is a written conversation
in which a student and teacher communicate on a regular basis. Students write as much
as they choose and the teacher writes back responding to students' questions and
comments, introducing new topics, or asking questions. The teacher is actively
participating in the interchange; the lecturer also can be an evaluator who corrects or
comments on the student's writing and in this case the lecturer gave the comments and
suggestion for improving students’ writing in short essay writing course.
Dialogue journals are beneficial for all types of students including all ages and
levels because offering an interactive but individualized learning context, it also can
improve concentration, generate better quality writing, and promote understanding. In
addition, dialogue journals activity offer creative, safe and open outlets for articulation
via the written word, offer students ways to express themselves and offer teachers ways
to individually respond to each student’s needs via modeling according to each learner’s
need (Sartor, 2011).
The previous study which conducted by Haynes-Mays et al (2011) demonstrated
that daily dialogue journal writing is highly effective in improving African American
fourth-grade students’ writing skills. This improvement is based on the student’s ability
to reduce many of the AAVE features in their writings. Further, it is the direct and
constant model of the teacher’s response of Standard American English (SAE) in the
167 | ELT-Echo, Volume 2, Number 2, November 2017
ISSN: 2579-8170 e-ISSN: 2549-5089
journal that proves to be very instrumental. These beneficial outcomes were obtained
even though the experimental conditions were not significantly different on measure of
instructional progress. In line with this research, the result of this study can give the
benefit to the students to improve their writing and gave them high score in short essay
writing class.
Dialogue journals not only open a new channel of communication, but they also
provide another context for language and literacy development. Students have the
opportunity to use English in a non-threatening atmosphere, in interaction with a
proficient English speaker. Because the interaction is written, it allows students to use
reading and writing in purposeful ways and provides a natural, comfortable bridge to
other kinds of writing.
Dialogue journals are similar to personal journals. The exception is that they are
written with the intent to be shared with a teacher or classmate. The person who receives
the journal reads the entry and responds to it. These journals are interactive and take the
form of a conversation (Tompkins, 2002). “Most importantly, dialogue journals are an
authentic writing activity and provide the opportunity for real communication between
students or between a student and the teacher” (Tompkins, 2003, p.235).
Dialogue journals are particularly successful in promoting the writing
development of students learning English as a second language. Researchers have found
that these students have the most success when they have the opportunity to choose their
own topics and when their teachers contribute to the discussion by requesting a reply,
statements or other comments (Peyton & Seyoum, 1989; Reyes, 1991). Staton (1993),
states that learning to read and write for nonnative, as well as native speakers, can be a
process much like the natural, practical process of oral language acquisition as it occurs
between parents and children. Dialogue journals, as written conversations, resemble in
many ways the types of interactions characteristic of first language acquisition. Reyes
also found that students who are English Language Learners (ELL) were more successful
in writing dialogue journal entries than in writing in response to books they have read.
Dialogue journals are especially advantageous since they provide an authentic
writing experience while they help build a relationship between the teacher and student.
Among the benefits of using dialogue journals in the classroom are that they often provide
a positive writing experience for English Language Learners, they foster trusting
relationships, guide instruction, and promote discussions about literature.
CONCLUSION
The implementation of dialogue journals activity in teaching writing for the fifth
semester students of English Education Department at UIN Antasari Banjarmasin
academic year 2016/2017 is considered as a place for students to communicate with their
lecturer and allows for communication and in each informal entry, the students write to
the teacher. After that, the teacher reads the entry and responds. The students write about
a topic that is interesting to them in various types of essay based on Short Essay Writing
course syllabi. Lecturer also can use dialogue journals to help determine which stage of
invented spelling a student is in, in order to accommodate that student in classroom
instruction.
The students’ achievement in short essay writing course for the fifth semester
students of English Education Department at UIN Antasari Banjarmasin academic year
2016/2017 are very good because most of the students got A score for short essay writing
Nor, The Use of Dialogue | 168
DOI 10.24235/eltecho.v%vi%i.2179
course, it is a prove that the use of dialogue journals has positive effect on students’
personal adjustment, development of awareness for audience, understanding of others,
increased motivation for purposeful writing, improved skill in conversing, and overall
growth as writers.
REFERENCES
Anderson, M. & Anderson, K. 2003a. Text Types in English 2. Macmillan Education
Australia PTY LTD.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., Razaveih, A., & Sorensen, C. 2006. Introduction to Research in
Education. Belmont: Thomson – Wadsworth
Bambang, Y. 1996. Effectiveness of Journal Writing in Supporting Skills in Writing
English Essay. The Journal of Education. Vol. 4. pp. 311-313.
Bello, T. 1997. Writing Topics for Adult ESL Students. Paper presented at the 31st
Annual Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Language Convention,
Orlando, FI, USA.
Brown, H. D. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language
Pedagogy (2nd Edition). New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
Brown, H.D. 2010. Language Assessment. USA: Pearson Education Limited.
Cohen, A.D., & Cavalcanti, M.C. 1990. Feedback on Composition: Teacher and
Students verbal reports. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Second Language Writing: Research
Insights for the Classroom (pp.155-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
El Khoiri, N. 2006. Dialogue Journals: What They are and How to Use Them. Paper
presented in the Workshop at the Faculty of Letters of State University of
Malang, February 3, 10, and 17, 2006.
Gray, R. 2004. Grammar Correction in ESL/EFL Writing Classes May Not Be
Effective. The Internet TESL Journal, (Online), Vol. X, No. 11, (http://iteslj.
org/ Technique/Gray-WritingCorrection, accessed on May 1, 2017).
Harmer, J. 2001. How to Teach English. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.
Harmer, J. 2007. The practice of English Language Teaching. United Kingdom: Pearson
Education Limited.
Hiemstra, R. 2001. Uses and benefits of journal writing in L. M. English & M. A. Gillen.
Promoting journal writing in adult education. pp 19-26.
http://eli.tamu.edu/resources/profile.html ESL COMPOSITION PROFILE
Isabell, V. 2010. Dialogue Journals: A Way to Encourage Emergent Writers. Senior
Honors Theses. 239.
Nunan, David. 1998. Designing Task for The Communicative Classroom. Boston:
Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
Peyton, J.K. & Reed, L. 1990. Dialogue Journal Writing with Nonnative English
Speakers: A Handbook for Teachers. Bloomington, Illinois: Pantograph Printing.
Peyton, J.K. 1993. Dialogue Journals: Interactive Writing to Develop Language and
Literacy. ERIC Digest, (Online), [ED 284 276], (http://www.indiana.edu /eric_
rec /ieo//digests/d99bib.html, accessed on May 21, 2017)
Rebecca, J. L. 2003. A Critical Handbook of Children’s Literature. Massachuset:
Pearson Education, Inc.
169 | ELT-Echo, Volume 2, Number 2, November 2017
ISSN: 2579-8170 e-ISSN: 2549-5089
Richards, J.C. 1990. The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Tuan, L.T. 2010. Enhancing EFL Learners’ Writing Skill via Journal Writing. English
Language Teaching. Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 81-83
White, R. V. (Ed.). 1995. New Ways in Teaching Writing. Bloomington, Illinois:
Pantagraph Printing.
Widayati, S. 2003. Pembelajaran dan Evaluasi Writing. Jakarta: Departemen
Pendidikan & Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.