Upload
sharleen-stokes
View
217
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Investing in People:New Leadership
FedEx Institute of Technology
Craig GrossmanInterim Executive
Director
Michael HawleyDirector of Special Projects
Professors Thomas Buggey, Instruction & Curriculum
Leadership Ted Burkey, Chemistry Christine Jiang, Finance, Insurance, & Real
Estate Guy Mittleman, Psychology David Russomanno, Electrical & Computer
Eng.
Associate ProfessorsTenure and Promotion Thad Wasklewicz, Earth Sciences Michael Albers, English Loel Kim, English Verner Mitchell, English David Burchfield, Health Administration Jonathon Judaken, History Daniel Unowsky, History Sanjay Mishra, Physics Heidi Levitt, Psychology
Associate ProfessorsTenure and Promotion Ted Lee, Management Information Systems Balaji Krishnan, MSCM Sharon Horne, Counseling Ed Psych Jennifer Borek, Instruction & Curr Leadership Sandra Cooley-Nichols, Instruction & Curr Leadership Thomas Slack, Engineering Technology David Romantz, Law
Promotion Only Matthias Kaelberer, Political Science Charles Blaha, Psychology
Clinical FacultyProfessor Marion Hammett, AUSLP Marilyn Wark, AUSLP
Associate Professor Laura Martin, AUSLP Caroline Royal-Evans, AUSLP Teresa Wolf, AUSLP Jean McIvor, Nursing
The Year in Review SACS on-site visit complete Memphis MSA Plan approved New department of Computer Science New degree programs in high-demand
areas• Biomedical Engineering (B.S.B.E.)• Bioinformatics (M.S.)• Geographic Information Systems (Graduate
Certificate) At TBR and THEC for approval:
• Public Health (M.S.)• Computer Engineering (M.S.)• Computer Science (M.S. & Ph.D.)
On-Tap for 2005-2006 Academic Activity Calendar Strategic Planning/Program Review QEP/Learning Communities Campus Master Planning Classroom Renovation Projects Areas of Focus/Excellence
• Biotechnologies• Community Initiatives• Healthcare • Learning Technologies• Music and Theatre• Teacher Education
Quality Priorities Academic Peers Academic Persistence Outstanding Students Outstanding Faculty and Staff Strategic Growth Growth in Sponsored Programs Connection to the Community
Key Measures Baseline 2004 2005 2008 2012
Honors enrollment 700 932 970 1500 1700
Endowed professorships and Chairs of Excellence 28 52 55 60 80
Research $25m
$41m $44m $70m $100
Faculty Retention 91.4 93.1 94.5 95.0
Goal achieved
Alumni 4.2% 5.4% 7.1% 10.0%
Enhancing Image and Reputation: Academic and Funding Peers Academic Peers University of Alabama,
Birmingham Arizona State UniversityFlorida International UniversityUniversity of South FloridaGeorgia State UniversityUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of CincinnatiUniversity of Oklahoma, Norman University of Pittsburgh University of South Carolina,
ColumbiaUniversity of Houston,
University Park
Funding PeersUniversity of AlabamaUniversity of ArkansasUniversity of South FloridaFlorida International UniversityGeorgia State UniversityUniversity of LouisvilleUniversity of Oklahoma, NormanUniversity of South CarolinaUniversity of HoustonTexas Tech UniversityGeorge Mason UniversityVirginia Commonwealth
Investing in Students: Academic Persistence
Approach: Living/Learning Communities Memphis Extras Intervention/High-Risk Students Faculty Involvement Appropriate Advising
For example………
Investing in Students:Retention and Graduation RatesYear Graduation Rate Retention Rate
UM 6-yr TBR 6-yr UM 1-yr TBR 1-yr
1996 34.9 37.27 72 N/A
1997 34.6 37.85 71.4 N/A
1998 34.0 N/A 73.6 N/A
1999 71.3 N/A
2000 72.1 78.3
2001 71.3 77.9
2002 75.1 79.9
2003 73.9 79.5
Investing in Students: Student Quality
Approach: Admissions Standards Faculty Involvement West Tennessee Recruitment MSA Program Revamped Scholarship Program Honors Program National Merit Scholars
For example……..
Investing in Students:Scholarships
Scholarships Awarded 2001-2006 (All Sources - * 2006 Figures as of 8-10-05)
15271656
2022
2787
3047
4968
571 415402608549491
172717941863
15361474
21792149
5843
3285
2592
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
5500
6000
6500
2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 2003-2004 2004-2005 *2005-2006 (As of 8-10-
05)
Freshmen AcademicScholarship Recipients
Academic ScholarshipRecipients
HOPE Freshmen
HOPE (All)
All Scholarship Recipients
6,000 Projected Total Scholarships
for ’05-06
Investing in Students:Admissions Index
Category AY 2003
AY 2004
AY 2005
AY 2009
Lowest Index Score 88 88 90 94
Avg. Score 115.2 115.8 116.7 118.7
>+124 Score
569 575 649 750
# Admitted Below Index
41 36 19 5
Investing in Students:National Merit Finalists
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
2004 2005 2006
NewContinuingTotal
Investing in Students: Academic Status and Retention
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
AY 2003AY 2004
Number of Suspensions
Investing in Faculty and Staff:Faculty/Staff QualityApproach: Salaries Rewards Programs University Professorships/Chairs of Excellence Appropriate Work Spaces
For example…………
Investing in Faculty: Salaries
Peer Salary Comparisons
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
Per
cen
t In
crea
se 2
001-
2004
Investing in Faculty:University ProfessorshipsCategory AY
2001
AY 2003
AY 2005
AY 2009
Endowed Professorships 13 17 24 35
Non-Endowed Professorships ? ? 5 10
Chairs of Excellence 25 25 26 29
Investing in Faculty:Faculty Retention
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Investing in People & Community:Strategic GrowthApproach: Targeted Growth in Undergraduate Programs Growth of Graduate Programs Off-Site Enrollment On-Line Enrollment
For example……..
Investing in Students:Graduate Programs
4200
4400
4600
4800
5000
5200
5400
5600
2001 2003 2005 2009
Number
Investing in Students:RODP
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
HeadcountEnrollment
F2002 S2003 F2003 S2004 F2004 S2005 F2005*
*Enrollment to date
Investing in Students:Off-Campus Enrollment
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
2004 2005
ApplingBishop ByrneCordovaDyersburgJacksonMillingtonCarrier
Investing in Faculty:External SupportApproach: Development of sponsored research programs Increase in federal dollars Increase in partnerships Increase in peer-reviewed products
For example……..
Investing in Faculty:Sponsored Programs
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2001 2003 2005 2009
Total $Federal $
Investing in Faculty:Sponsored Programs
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
in m
illio
ns
Source: U of M Research Support
FY05: over $44 million; a 16% average increase over last five years.
Investing in Faculty:2005 Research Awards [by College)
$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
$20,000,000
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Arts & Sciences Audiology & Speech-Language PathologyBusiness & Economics College of EducationCollege of Engineering Communication & Fine ArtsPresident's Office Provost's OfficeVice Provost for Extended Programs
Building Productive Partnerships: Community Connections Research partnerships Community problem solving Service to the community
For example…..
Building Productive Partnerships: Community Connections Government, e.g.:
• Memphis City Schools and Shelby County Schools
• City of Memphis and Shelby County Government
Corporate Community, e.g.: • FedEx• AutoZone
Nonprofit Community, e.g.:• Methodist and Baptist Hospitals• Memphis BioWorks
Investing in Community:Uptown Initiative Partners: Government, Developers,
University Goal: Transformation of Inner City
Neighborhood
Investing in Image and Reputation:Coming Home Art Exhibition of 122
Paintings and Sculptures by 73 Southern Artists
Tour Stops:• The Art Museum of the
University of Memphis• Florida State University • Museum of Fine Arts,
Tallahassee Florida• Museum of Biblical Art
New York
Investing in Students:Graduate Program in Philosophy Goal: To increase the number of
African-American graduate students Our Outcomes:
• 19 African-American Enrolled Students• 12 Progressing to a Degree• 4 Completed Ph.D.’s
Completed Ph.D.’s of Peer Institutions:• 2 each at Yale, Chicago, Cornell, Michigan,
Northwestern, Wisconsin, Harvard, Minnesota, North Carolina
• 3 at Pittsburgh
Investing in Community:Ground Water Institute TDEC Project to
generate:• GIS files of surface
features (rivers, roads, railroads, etc.),
• Zone 1 and 2 capture zones for water supply systems,
• National Elevation Data (NED) raster maps by watershed,
• Superfund site location
• GIS training.
USGS Project to model the Upper Mississippi Embayment incorporating new data and technologies
Investing in Community:Supply Chain Management & The Med Supply Chain:
Collaborative efforts to optimize organizational systems• Project Goal: Determine
where patients spent their time in the Trauma Center
• Outcome: Reduction in time spent in the Trauma Center using Radio Frequency Identification
Investing in Our Community:Memphis Literacy Programs
*Notes: ELL students were not included in the analyses because they took the TCAP in ’04 but took the CELLA in ’05. Also, only students who were enrolled by the 20 th day of school and remained at the same school through TCAP were included (membership category 1).SOURCE: Memphis City Schools, August 15, 2005.
2004 % Proficient
2005 % Proficient
Change
Memphis Literacy Academy Schools
65.2 80.1 14.9
Reading First Schools
72.0 82.6 10.6
Neither Intervention
80.4 89.1 8.7
Overall District 76.0 86.3 10.3
Fulfilling the Vision
Investing in People Creating Interdisciplinary Initiatives Building Productive Partnerships_________________________________
Developing New Resources Enhancing Image and Reputation Community Connectedness
What is The Faculty Senate?
A subset of the General Faculty Consists of 41 Senators, one from each Department/grouping Senators attend two senate-related meetings per month
Committee meeting General meeting
The Faculty Senate 2005-2006
Purpose:
Serves as the vehicle of faculty participation. The Faculty Senate is a forum for the formulation of faculty opinion.
Evaluates and makes recommendations about: academic matters, academic support functions, minimum criteria for faculty appointment, promotion and tenure, and conditions of employment.
Maintains academic freedom.
Approves graduation and general education curriculum requirements.
Faculty Senate StructureStanding Committees
Executive Committee
Committee on Committees
Academic Policies
Academic Support
AdministrativePolicies
LibraryPolicies
ResearchPolicies
Faculty Policies
President President-Elect
Parliamentarian Secretary
Member-at Large Member-at-Large
TBR Representative
What WE DoDescription:
The Executive Committee determines matters that require Faculty Senate action---These are called CHARGES.
CHARGES are distributed to one or more Standing Committees to study and make reports and recommendations to the full Senate.
RECOMMENDATIONS are presented in writing to the full Senate for discussion, approval, or a rewrite.
After Approval of the RECOMMENDATION, the document is forwarded to the Provost and/or President with his/her response returned in a timely manner.
The Executive CommitteeFaculty Senate—Elected Members
Executive Committee
President
Sheryl Maxwell
Secretary
Teresa Dalle
President-Elect
Pat Stevens
Member-at-Large
Walter Kirkpatrick
Parliamentarian
Bill JermannMember-at-Large
Alan Proffitt
Carolyn Featherstone
TRBFaculty Sub-Council
Representative
Charles Biggers
Standing Committees
Academic Policies:
Academic Support:
Faculty Policies:
Research Policies:
Review and make recommendation about:
Admission and retention standards,
curriculum, transfer requirements
Academic aspects of support—Computer Services, Centers for teaching excellence, writing laboratories
Academic freedom, Faculty Handbook, faculty salaries and benefits
Research opportunities, the award and administration of University grants, grant and contract research
Standing Committees (continued) Administrative
Policies:
Library Policies:
Committee on Committees
Conduct a continuous review of:Policies, procedures and practices
associated with buildings, grounds, parking, campus security, staff services.
Policies, procedures and practices associated with libraries including support personnel, facilities, acquisitions, and related activities including fiscal resources.
Recommends the assignment of the various senators to a committee upon need.
Communication with Senate
We welcome ANY and ALL concerns
to be given to your Senator.
The Senate is one avenue of a communication tool for you as a faculty member.