Upload
others
View
4
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE STRUCTURAL MECHANICS BEHAVIOR OF
SEALED INSULATING GLASS UNITS
by
JON BAXTER ANDERSON, B.S in C.E.
A DISSERTATION
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in
Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for
the Degree of
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY
May, 1985
^'"^^ { ^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Support of research work used as background for this document was
provided by the Glass Research and Testing Laboratory of Texas Tech
University and the National Science Foundation (NSF Grant CEE-
8118214). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations
expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not
necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
I want to thank the members of my committee for their assistance,
and a particular thank you to the Department of Civil Engineering,
Texas Tech University and Department Chairman E.W. Kiesling for his
patience and support.
n
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paae
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS i i
ABSTRACT vi
LIST OF TABLES viii
LIST OF FIGURES ix
I. INTRODUCTION 1
II. DISCUSSION OF INDUSTRY RESPONSE TO HIGH DEMAND 4
III. THE RESEARCH QUESTION 12
IV. THE RESEARCH PLAN 17
Mode 1 s 17
Global Model 18
Local Model 21
Sealant Model 23
Other Models 23
Component Behavior 24
Gl ass 24
Sealants 24
Spacers 25
Corner Effects 25
i i i
Exercise of Models and Applications of Investigations 26
V. INSULATING GLASS UNIT RESPONSE MODELS 27
Global Model 27
Local Model 28
Spacer Model 33
Corner Effects Model 37
VI. MATERIAL PROPERTIES 40
Gl ass 40
Spacers 40
Sealants 41
Analysis 42
Method 42
Verification 50
Results 50
Application 53
Work in Progress 57
VII. PARAMETRIC STUDIES 58
Selection of Reference Evaluation Condition 58
Evaluations of Seal Details 61
Parametric Studies 67
Corner Effects Model 78
IV
VIII. DISCUSSION OF BEHAVIOR PREDICTED BY MODELS 89
Parametric Evaluations 89
Split and Welded Spacers 89
Geometric Studies 90
Effect of Sealant Depth ..." 91
Effect of Spacer Aspect Ratio 91
Corner Effects Model 94
Potential Additional Model Applications 96
Conclusions 98
Recommendations for Future Efforts 110
LIST OF REFERENCES 112
APPENDICES
A. LISTING OF SEALANT STRESS-STRAIN PROGRAM 114
B. TABLES OF ORDERED STRESSES 141
ABSTRACT
Aesthetically pleasing, glass sheathed buildings and insulating
glass (IG) units have formed a combination that is at once attractive
and efficient. The use of IG units has increased in all types of
buildings construction. Typical IG units consist of two glass plates
separated by a perimeter spacer of aluminum. The perimeter is then
coated with a polymer sealant which seals the air between the glass
plates and holds the unit together. Until recently, most IG units
were designed on an experimental basis, primarily by improving the
polymer seals that seal the unit and hold it together. Computational
tools for examining IG units on a structural mechanics basis were not
available. This document introduces a series of working and proposed
models designed to meet this need.
An examination of the need for research and development in the IG
unit field is followed by a discussion of "global" and "local" models
designed to examine IG unit behavior from a structural mechanics
standpoint. The global model considers the response of the entire IG
unit, while the local model focuses on smaller segments of the unit
within the seal detail. Specifically, the local model examines the
complex response of the boundary of the unit where the materials
making up the unit seal (aluminum, glass, sealant) are in contact.
Engineering properties of glass and aluminum are well defined,
but those of sealants are dependent on polymer type, strain rate and
vi
st ress r e l a x a t i o n . A method fo r f i n d i n g the engineering proper t ies of
polymer sealants i s presented.
F i n a l l y , the loca l model i s exercised in a s e r i e s o f pa rame t r i c
s t u d i e s which examine the e f f e c t on component s t r esses caused by
changes in environmental c o n d i t i o n s , s e a l a n t modulus, spacer cross
s e c t i o n , d e p t h o f p e r i m e t e r s e a l a n t , and spacer aspect r a t i o .
Po ten t ia l add i t i ona l uses o f the l o c a l model are d i scussed . These
d i s c u s s i o n s i n c l u d e the e f f e c t and modeling method fo r inc lud ing the
IG u n i t mounting system such as a mechanical or d ry neoprene gasket
and a polymer " s t r u c t u r a l " sea l .
v n
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 SUMMARY OF LARGEST STRESSES FOR SCENARIOS USING 150 PSI SEALANT MODULUS 63
2 SUMMARY OF LARGEST STRESSES FOR SCENARIOS USING 250 PSI SEALANT MODULUS 65
3 SUMMARY OF LARGEST STRESSES FOR GEOMETRIC STUDIES 74
4 SUMMARY OF LARGEST STRESSES FOR SEALANT DEPTH STUDIES 76
5 SUMMARY OF LARGEST STRESSES FOR SPACER ASPECT RATIO STUDIES 84
6 SUMMARY OF LARGEST STRESSES FOR CORNER EFFECTS MODEL 87
7 CHANGE IN MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL STRESS DUE TO SPACER GEOMETRY CHANGE 92
vm
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1 TYPICAL SUPPLY DEMAND CURVE 5
2 SALES OF INSULATING GLASS 1972-1980 (BAR GRAPH) AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 1972-1980 (LINE GRAPH) ... 8
3 TYPICAL IG UNIT 14
4 IG UNIT MODEL WITH SIMPLY SUPPORTED PLATE ASSUMPTION 19
5 PROPOSED MINOR-VALLABHAN IG UNIT MODEL 20
6 LOCAL MODEL SHOWING INPUT PARAMETERS AT "CUT" SECTION 22
7 CROSS-SECTION OF IG UNIT AT TOP CENTER SHOWING LOCATION OF LOCAL MODEL 29
8 LOCAL MODEL DISCRETIZATION 30
9 LOCATION AND POSITIVE DIRECTION OF LOCAL MODEL ELEMENT STRESS 32
10 SPACER MODEL FOR ONE EDGE OF IG UNIT 34
11 SEALANT DEFORMATION AND SPACER DISPLACEMENT CAUSED BY ROTATION OF IG UNIT GLASS PLATES 36
12 DETAIL OF IG UNIT CORNER SHOWING VERTICAL SPACER PORTION AND CORNER EFFECTS MODEL TO STUDY THE EFFECT OF THIS VERTICAL SPACER PORTION 39
13 CASTING THE STRESS-RELAXATION TEST SAMPLE 44
14 STRAINING DEVICE ATTACHED TO STRESS-RELAXATION
TEST SAMPLE 44
15 AN INSTRUMENTED STEEL POST 45
16 RECORDING OF RELAXATION DATA 45
17 SAMPLE GRAPHIC OUTPUT FROM SEALANT COMPUTER PROGRAM 48
TX
Figure Page
18 INSTRON TEST SAMPLE 51
19 PREDICTED AND TESTED STRESS-STRAIN RESULTS FOR "PRO-SEAL" SEALANT 52
20 VERTICAL PLATE WITH TOP AND BOTTOM SEALANT SUPPORTS i 54
21 MODULUS VS. ELONGATION RATE FOR "PRO-SEAL"
SEALANT AT VARIOUS STRAIN RATES 56
22 CIRCULAR SHAPED SPACER DISCRETIZATION 69
23 TRIANGULAR SHAPED SPACER DISCRETIZATION 70
24 TRAPEZIOD SHAPED SPACER DISCRETIZATION 71
25 INVERTED "T" SHAPED SPACER DISCRETIZATION 72
26 "STANDARD" SPACER DISCRETIZATION 73
27 ASPECT RATIO TEST SQUARE (DATUM) SPACER 79
28 ASPECT RATIO TEST 3/8 IN. BY 1/2 IN. SPACER 80
29 ASPECT RATIO TEST 1/4 IN. BY 1/2 IN. SPACER 81
30 ASPECT RATIO TEST 1/8 IN. BY 1/2 IN. SPACER 82
31 ASPECT RATIO TEST, THIN STRIP BY 1/2 IN. SPACER .... 83
32 EFFECT OF SEALANT DEPTH ON IG UNIT COMPONENT STRESSES 93
33 EFFECT OF SPACER ASPECT RATIO ON IG UNIT COMPONENT STRESSES 95
34 EFFECT ON MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL IG UNIT COMPONENT STRESSES DUE TO CHANGE IN SEALANT MODULUS 97
35 PROPOSED LOCAL MODEL FOR MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED IG UNITS 99
36 PROPOSED LOCAL MODEL FOR GASKET RESTRAINED IG UNITS 100
X
Figure Page
37 PROPOSED LOCAL MODEL FOR POLYMER MOUNTED IG UNITS 101
38 UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO I SPLIT SPACER 103
39 UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO II SPLIT SPACER 104
40 UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO I WELDED SPACER 105
41 UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO II WELDED SPACER 106
42 UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO III 107
43 UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO IV 108
44 UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL FOR CIRCULAR SPACER WITH SCENARIO IV ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS 109
XT
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
The oil crisis of 1973 ended an era of plentiful, inexpensive
energy. Large, powerful, energy-inefficient automobiles were replaced
by smaller, more efficient ones. Buildings constructed for low
initial cost, assuming cheap energy, experienced a change in which
energy costs became a major yearly operational expense. Particularly
vulnerable to increased energy costs were high rise, glass curtain
wall towers with monolithic glazing. These buildings were both
aesthetically pleasing and had low initial cost, but were dependent on
cheap energy for heating and cooling. Following the oil embargo,
architects experimented with various methods of making buildings more
energy efficient. These methods included reducing the number of
windows to few or none, designing sun shading as part of the
structure, and increasing insulation. These solutions increased the
initial building cost in order to save money (energy dollars) in the
long term. Larger initial costs and life cycle costing increased
investment recovery times. Reduction of initial cost and investment
recovery time, while maintaining energy efficiency, became a new goal
in building construction.
A possible method for reaching this goal involved use of
insulating glass (IG) units. The attractive and low cost glass towers
could be retained with a relatively small increase in cost if IG
units were employed in the glass curtain wall. When this approach
proved successful, not only for new construction but as a retrofit for
1
existing buildings, the demand for IG units increased. The demand
was sufficiently large that entry into the marketplace by many
new IG unit manufacturers was accomplished with minimal amounts
of testing or research and development. If IG units were tested at
all, they were evaluated from a seal durability standpoint, to ensure
their integrity as a sealed unit, rather than as a structural system.
The general objective of the research reported herein is the
development of mathematical models to describe the behavior of the IG
unit as a structural system, using the principles of structural
mechanics. The models are used to characterize the behavior of
representative IG units under loading and environmental conditions
that may be expected in service. Specifically, the investigations
reported herein include the following:
1. Structural mechanics behavior of materials used in making
an IG unit, with particular emphasis on engineering
properties for the sealants.
2. Structural mechanics behavior of glass plates within the
IG unit in response to environmentally induced loadings:
wind pressure, barometric pressure change, and temperature
change.
3. S t r u c t u r a l mechan ics behav io r a t a boundary s e c t i o n
( inc ludes the spacer and s e a l a n t d e t a i l ) l o ca ted a t the
top edge cen te r l i ne of an IG u n i t .
4. O v e r a l l spacer behav io r d u r i n g temperature and pressure
changes.
5. The effects of rigid spacer corners on the behavior of a
boundary section near the corner of the IG unit.
Results of these investigations provide useful insights into the
material properties and structural mechanics responses of IG units to
environmental conditions in which they are expected to perform. The
investigations provide the following results:
1. Comparisons of behavior for IG units with different seal
details.
2. An evaluation of the impact on the market for insulating
glass produced by high energy demand and increased energy
costs.
3. An assessment of additional investigations made possible
by the availability of the models and methods developed
herein.
CHAPTER II
DISCUSSION OF INDUSTRY RESPONSE TO HIGH DEMAND
The increased requirement for IG units was essentially the result
of two related causes of high demand. First was energy demand.
Second was a demand for products designed to reduce energy use when
prices for energy increased. Energy demand was high because increased
energy use to produce goods and services was perceived as improving
the quality of life. The low cost of energy prior to 1973 allowed
goods and services to be provided at a relatively low cost. For
example, the initial cost of new buildings was low since provisions
for energy conservation were not included. If the buildings were
energy inefficient the energy demand could be increased for a very
small increase in variable costs. Energy demand was large enough that
the United States could not provide sufficient energy to meet the
demand. The remainder was imported, mainly in the form of petroleum,
from other oil producing countries. Even with imports, prices for
energy remained low. The oil embargo of 1973 was essentially a
created shortage for political gain. In this country, however, the
demand remained high. The result was classic supply-demand response.
This shortage constituted a "change in supply," as opposed to "a
change in the quantity supplied," which had the effect of shifting the
supply curve to the left while maintaining its position relative to
the price axis (Ref. Fig. 1). Demand did not change, however. This
caused a new equilibrium point to be established at a higher price.
Energy prices became four to five times higher. Since the amount of
0)
to
u o
On
D
>«1
0 rH D D4 c a ro 3
pC W U
• ^S . • » • " ' ^ ^
a U (U
•H & )^ (0 Oi 4J
V4 E 0 D ^
•H W U
Xi 0 •H V< rH 0 •^ IW
> 1
•H
o o o z
a I
>-—J Q-Q .
0 0
I—I O->-
OH
o
aoTJd
imported energy curtailed was approximately thirty percent of total
demand, the large rise in price demonstrated the very steep slope
of the demand curve. The steep slope of the demand curve implies
that demand was nearly constant and was due to the lifestyle in place,
in the United States, at the time of the embargo. Typical responses
to shortages are conservation and rationing.
This classic response of supply-demand was to be relatively short
term. Because of the embargo, conservation measures were instituted.
Some of the conservation measures included changing heating/cooling
thermostats to marginal comfort levels, forming carpools, lowering
highway speed limits and apportioning gasoline to suppliers. The need
for long term measures of lowering consumer energy costs was apparent.
One long term measure was to improve the energy efficiency of
buildings. This improvement meant retrofitting existing buildings
with a means of energy conservation, as well as making new
construction as energy efficient as possible. One measure that met
both the retrofit and new construction energy conservation criteria
was the installation of IG units.
Meeting this energy conservation need with IG units caused an
increase in demand for the units. This second cause of high demand is
the result of an effort to ameliorate the financial burden of a price
increase due to a shortage (change in supply) of another product that
has few or no substitutes. The bar graph of Figure 1 shows the
results of a survey taken in 1982 giving sales of IG units in millions
of square feet from 1972 to 1980 (AAMA, MIR, 1973-1981). As a com
parative measure construction trends in millions of constant 1972
7
d o l l a r s are shown as a l i n e graph f o r the same years on Figure 2 (U.S.
Bureau of the Census, 1982). Sales increased d u r i n g the 1973 energy
c r i s i s and the year a f t e r . The year 1974 witnessed a severe dec l ine
in new c o n s t r u c t i o n , y e t i n 1975 IG u n i t sa les remained c o n s t a n t ,
perhaps i n d i c a t i n g a move to r e t r o f i t e x i s t i n g bu i l d i ngs . A f te r 1975,
sales of IG u n i t continued to increase u n t i l a s l i g h t decl ine occurred
i n 1980 . T h i s i n c r e a s e i n demand had the s h o r t term e f f e c t o f
increas ing pr ices f o r the u n i t s . An inc reased p r i c e prompted more
manu fac tu re r s t o e n t e r the IG u n i t manufacturing f i e l d . Entry i n t o
the market f o r IG un i t s meant a qu i ck s t a r t - u p i n o rde r t o compete
w i th producers already in the marketplace.
Methods o f e n t e r i n g t h e m a r k e t p l a c e from a manu fac tu r i ng
standpoint e n t a i l product development, t e s t i n g , and f i n a l l y marke t i ng
the product . Entry i n t o a high demand market of ten precludes the time
n e c e s s a r y f o r p r o d u c t d e v e l o p m e n t and t e s t i n g ; t h u s , e n t r y i s
accomplished by copying designs or by s imp l y b u i l d i n g a p roduc t and
marketing i t . In the case of bu i l d ing a product and marketing i t , the
development phase i s usua l ly accomplished in the f i e l d through t r i a l
and e r r o r . This process o f ten involves f a i l u r e s and l i t i g a t i o n . This
approach cons t i t u t es a v a l i d product development method i f the demand
i s h igh enough t o assure t h a t i n i t i a l p r o f i t s are s u f f i c i e n t t o
r e c o v e r i n i t i a l i n v e s t m e n t . The company may t h e n l e a v e t h e
marke tp l ace or p r o v i d e monies to cover l i t i g a t i o n and, p o s s i b l y ,
replacement cos ts . The primary de t r imen t t o t h i s method i s l oss o f
consumer c o n f i d e n c e d u r i n g t h e t r i a l and e r r o r phase o f the
development.
8
Building Construction
Sales of Insulating Glass Units
b
cr en
o
c o
•H
400--
300-
m Q)
tH (0 cn CQ CQ (13
rH
C •H 4J 03
iH D CO C H
200-
100-
$100
$90
$80
$70
$60
CO
u
o Q
CN
4J
c (T3 +J CO c o u u-i O en c o
•H
2
G 0
o
3
CQ
<^ o u
•H 3 C3
YEARS
FIGURE 2. SALES OF INSULATING GLASS 1972-1980 (BAR GRAPH) AND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION 1972-1980 (LINE GRAPH)
The advantages of the trial and error method are the small lead
times for market entry, low investment cost for plant and equipment,
and low product development costs. Even if a high demand market entry
competed on the basis of price, the overall higher price for the
product due to the high demand would'provide a large early return on
the low investment costs. This is an obvious advantage.
The disadvantages of trial and error entry into the marketplace
are the potential for high litigation costs, loss of consumer
confidence and replacement costs in the event of product failure.
Entry into the marketplace with the intention of maintaining
product position and consumer confidence would require a reasonably
long lead time for product development. This research and development
phase usually consists of design, making prototypes, and testing until
some predetermined criteria are met. During this development time the
market is developed and, when a reliable product is obtained, sales
begin. Research and development does not end with the initiation of
sales. It usually continues during the market life of the product and
contributes to product improvement and reduced manufacturing costs.
Improving the product gives it a sales edge in consumer perceived
quality, which in turn enhances consumer confidence. Product
improvement and reduced manufacturing costs combine to improve the
company market share and margin over the long run. In contrast, the
continuing product development program of the trial and error method
consists of revisions to solve failure problems. Results are
increased manufacturing costs without significant product improvement.
10
Advantages of the product research and development method are
consumer confidence, a potentially larger market share, long term
return on investment and reduced production, litigation and
replacement costs. These advantages result primarily in providing a
more reliable product at a lower manufacturing cost.
Disadvantages of the product research and development method are
the high initial costs and lead times before marketing the product and
lower profits due to extended investment recovery time. The high
initial costs are due to investments for plant and equipment and
personnel costs for the product development phase. These costs
provide no return on investment during the product development time,
thus increasing the time required for investment recovery and reducing
short term profits. Profits could be larger over the long term for
the product research and development method; however, an examination
of opportunity costs would be required to verify this.
Entry into a high demand market would probably be predicated on
an expectation of high profits. This expectation would prompt most
entrants to select the trial and error method for a rapid return on
investment, unless an evaluation indicated that the demand for the
product would extend over the long term and an ongoing enterprise was
the goal of the investors. The long term demand for IG units is
probably going to be constant, as a minimum, given the popularity of
buildings with glass sheathing and the continued need for energy
conservation measures in years to come.
There are examples of companies entering the IG unit market
using, essentially, the trial and error method. Rapidly developed and
11
marketed units began to have service problems within a few years. In
many cases litigation was initiated. Settlement conditions sometimes
required that the company's units be replaced by the product of
another manufacturer. Eventually, the original IG unit manufacturer
sold out. In these examples, profits 'from a high demand product were
apparently not sufficient to absorb the costs of trial and error entry
into the marketplace.
Capturing a market segment is difficult at best. Maintaining
that segment requires consumer confidence in the product. Consumer
confidence is a must if the product demand and company survival is
expected to be long term and is expected to increase during continued
construction recovery.
IG unit markets are well established. Entry into the market at
this time would require a consumer perceived quality improved product.
Maintenance of an established market segment requires meeting customer
expectations of product improvement and cost reduction over time.
Market entry or maintenance can best be achieved by an active research
and development program and not through the trial-error-litigation
cycle.
What new methods can be a p p l i e d t o meet c u r r e n t consumer
c o n f i d e n c e c r i t e r i a ? The answer t o t h i s q u e s t i o n r e q u i r e s an
i n v e s t i g a t i o n of the research quest ion.
CHAPTER III
THE RESEARCH QUESTION
Glazing in construction in many parts of the United States has
consisted, until relatively recently, of monolithic glass plates.
Typically, rectangular glass plates of constant thickness are set in
some type of restraining frame. The glass plates are designed to
resist the effects of pressures (representing wind pressure) acting
normal to the surface of the plate. A mathematical model for
analyzing this type of plate and associated loading was presented by
Navier (Timoshenko, 1959) in 1820. This analysis method provided
adequate results for simply-supported rectangular plates with uniform
pressure loadings and small deflections. When large deflections
occur, membrane forces come into play and the Navier solution no
longer applies. The approach used most often in the solution of large
deflections of rectangular plates was advanced by Levy in 1949
(Timoshenko, 1959). This solution, which was formulated for steel
panels on ships, assumed an isotropic, homogeneous material, and
boundary conditions which forced edges of the plate to remain straight
during loading. When Levy's solution was applied to glass plates
the results were not always in agreement with experimental data
(Al-Tayyib, 1980). Recent research produced more modern methods of
solving glass plate problems (Al-Tayyib, 1980; Moore, 1980; Vallabhan
and Wang, 1981; Vallabhan and Ku, 1983). These newer solution methods
gave proper attention to glass plate boundary conditions and led to
better correlations between results from mathematical models and
12
13
experiments (Linden, et al., 1983; Behr, et al., 1985). The simply
supported assumption used with monolithic glass plates has been
adequate in studies accomplished prior to this time. Most glazing
support systems allow sufficient rotation and in-plane translations of
the edges of the plate to make valid the assumption that the plate is
simply supported.
IG units are constructed as two glass plates separated by a fixed
distance and enclosing an air space (Ref. Fig. 3 ) . The units are
considered "sealed." Trapped air is kept dry by a desiccant, thus
enhancing insulating qualities of the unit while keeping the inner
surfaces of the glass plate free of condensed moisture. Starting from
the outside of the unit, the glass surfaces are numbered one through
four. These surface designations are used to specify locations of
coatings that may be applied to the glass.
When the unit is sealed at the factory, the enclosed air is at a
specific temperature and barometric pressure. Changes in temperature
and barometric pressure, and the application of induced pressure when
the unit is in service, produce pressure changes in the sealed air
space. Analysis methods which characterize glass plate behavior may be
applied to individual glass plates within the IG unit. To use these
methods, pressure differences across each plate must be determined.
Determination of these pressures is in itself a complex problem. For
example, a wind pressure on the outer glass plate of an IG unit causes
a deflection of that plate. Deflection of the outer glass plate
alters the pressure condition in the sealed airspace. This pressure
change, in turn, produces a pressure on the inner glass plate. Hence,
14
SECONDARY SEAL
OUTER GLASS PLATE
INNER GLASS PLATE
PRIMARY SEAL
SURFACE DESIGNATIONS
FIGURE 3. TYPICAL IG UNIT
15
determination of pressures across individual glass plates becomes an
interaction problem involving relationships between deflections in
both glass plates and the pressure in the sealed airspace. In the
case of an IG unit the net pressure across the outer glass plate
depends on the wind pressure, the pi^essure inside the sealed unit
(which, in turn, depends on temperature and barometric pressure
changes), the change of pressure in the sealed airspace caused by the
deflection of the outer glass plate, and the resistance to pressure
change presented by the inner glass plate. Since the purpose of IG
units is to help maintain a temperature difference across the unit,
the two glass plates will be at different temperatures most of the
time. Due to this difference and the thermal expansion properties of
the glass, the relative sizes of the outer and inner glass plates will
vary, depending on temperature differences in the two plates. This
relative expansion will have an effect on the perimeter of the unit
where the various unit components (glass, spacer, sealant) are in
contact. The complexity of the IG unit in a structural mechanics
context does not end there. IG units are constructed of components
with different material properties. Each material responds to changes
in temperature and pressure according to its individual properties.
Each material also responds to displacements of adjacent materials at
component interfaces. Response of the IG unit due to these loads and
displacements include both primary (global) and secondary (local)
effects. These effects must be described by theoretical models.
Components at the boundary of the IG unit usually consist of two
types of materials. A metal spacer separates the glass plates. A
16
sealant (or sealants) around the edges o f the u n i t sea ls a i r i n and
m o i s t u r e ou t w h i l e ac t i ng as the s t r u c t u r a l component tha t binds the
u n i t together . Excessive stresses on the spacer could cause permanent
l o c a l d e f o r m a t i o n s o f t h e s p a c e r w h i c h w o u l d , i n t u r n , p l a c e
a d d i t i o n a l s t r e s s e s on the s e a l a n t . Local sea lan t f a i l u r e , i n
adhesion or c o h e s i o n , cou ld pe rm i t mo i s tu re and a i r t o c i r c u l a t e
i n t e r i o r t o the IG u n i t , r educ ing i n s u l a t i n g q u a l i t i e s and v isua l
aes the t i cs . Extensive sealant f a i l u r e s would r e s u l t in s e p a r a t i o n o f
the glass p la tes from the u n i t .
S t resses i n these boundary mater ia ls (spacer and sealant) r e s u l t
p r i m a r i l y f rom edge mot ions o f the g lass p l a t e s . Hence, t h e s e
stresses are e s s e n t i a l l y "secondary" s t resses. Special ized models are
needed to examine these boundary s t resses.
The c o m p l e x i t i e s o f IG u n i t b e h a v i o r desc r i bed above are
representa t i ve of the IG u n i t as i t i s manufac tu red , t h a t i s , as a
s t a n d - a l o n e u n i t . When IG un i t s are i n s t a l l e d , most g laz ing systems
app l y c l a m p i n g and o t h e r f o r c e s t o t h e u n i t s , a d d i n g t o t h e
d i f f i c u l t i e s o f d e s c r i b i n g t h e i r b e h a v i o r . A " t y p i c a l " IG u n i t
support system i s d i f f i c u l t t o d e f i n e . Many are custom-made f o r a
p a r t i c u l a r s t ruc tu re and o f f - t h e - s h e l f systems vary from manufacturer
to manufacturer. This s i t u a t i o n compounds the problem of de f i n ing the
forces placed on the IG u n i t by the g laz ing system.
Development of models t ha t def ine the response of the complex IG
u n i t system i s the focus of t h i s document. Primary emphasis i s on IG
un i t s as stand-alone u n i t s . Discussions fo r i n c l u d i n g c o n s i d e r a t i o n
of support cond i t ions as fu tu re endeavors are also inc luded.
CHAPTER IV
THE RESEARCH PLAN
Describing the structural mechanics behavior of IG units requires
several theoretical models. Each model represents a portion of the
total response that is of interest. Some of these models have been
developed fully; for others, formulations are offered that are based
on empirical factors yet to be determined. The research plan consists
of model formulation, the development of material properties for use
in the models, and demonstration of model use in describing the
structural mechanics behavior of IG units.
Models
The first step in the research plan addresses the response of an
IG unit as an integrated system. The unit is modeled as two
monolithic rectangular glass plates separated by an air space. Each
glass plate is considered to be simply supported around its perimeter,
with in-plane motion permitted. Units are also considered sealed
around their perimeters. Pressure differences between the sealed
airspace and the atmosphere on each side of the unit must be
considered. Unit response is based on pressure differences across the
glass plates. Unit response is measured in terms of bending stress,
membrane stress and displacement for the glass plates. This type of
response is "global," and addresses primary effects. Secondary
effects, such as edge distortion and support behavior, are neglected.
17
18
In the second part of the research plan, discrete portions of the
IG unit are examined to establish behaviors between components making
up the IG unit. The responses addressed in these discrete models
involve mostly secondary effects resulting from interactions between
IG unit components where they are in coritact at the perimeter of the
unit. These discrete models address the structural mechanics behavior
of individual components in the seal detail.
Global Model
This theoretical model representing the response of the IG unit
as an integrated structural unit is called the "global" model. The
global model provides information on the rectangular glass plates that
make up the majority of the material in the unit (Ref. Fig. 4 ) .
Rectangular plate theory provides the principal solution methods for
the global model.
A difficulty arises in properly defining support conditions for
the glass plates. Most rectangular plate solutions assume simply-
supported (non-yielding) conditions on their boundary. Glass plates
in an IG unit are supported by sealants; thus, the rectangular glass
plate is supported by elastic (yielding) boundary supports. Further,
the entire IG unit may be supported by dry neoprene gaskets or a
structural (liquid) seal (Ref. Fig. 5 ) . The inclusion of these
conditions in the global model has been proposed by Minor and
Vallabhan (1984) and is left for future efforts. All glass plate
solutions in this report are considered simply supported.
19
INNER GLASS PLATE
Surface designations
X
Spacer assumed rigid
Pressures acting on unit surfaces
OUTER GLASS PLATE
FIGURE 4. IG UNIT MODEL WITH SIMPLY SUPPORTED PLATE ASSUMPTION
20
-wv-
INNER GLASS PLATE
SURFACE DESIGNATIONS
Gasket or structural seal
'WArm Sealant response modelled by spring
3 2
jyVW
\
OUTER GLASS PLATE
Spacer assumed rigid
^ 1 ' ^2* 3' pressures acting on the unit surfaces.
FIGURE 5. PROPOSED MINOR-VALLABHAN IG UNIT MODEL
21
Local Model
Determination of local response within the combination of
components at the boundary, and determination of individual material
stresses and strains, requires a different, complementary approach.
The approach taken is referred to as the "local model" (Ref. Fig. 6).
The local model is capable of describing secondary stresses in the
boundary components at a single cross-section at the edge of the IG
unit. Modeling this response requires an analysis method that uses
individual material properties to calculate component responses to
various imposed loadings and or displacements. Because of the variety
of components, each with its constituent material, the finite element
method of modeling was considered the most viable for the local model.
Modeling of an entire cross-section of an IG unit by the finite
element method would be costly. Further, responses obtained for
various components at the boundary would not be descriptive at a scale
necessary for proper evaluation. Even if the centerline of the IG
unit were considered as a line of symmetry, the element size necessary
for efficient modeling would lead to excessively long computer
solution times. To overcome the difficulties of scale and solution
time, a small cross-section focused on the seal detail itself was
selected (Ref. Fig. 6). This approach had advantages in increasing
element size and reducing the number of elements. Difficulties are
encountered in representing stresses and displacements at the point
where the local model is sectioned to remove it from the global model.
This difficulty was solved by imposing boundary variables from the
22
I—
0 0
UJ
<: Q-
e3 I—•
o 3 : oo
o
o
U3
UJ
23
global model at the cut section. Boundary values impose the same
stresses at the boundary of the local model as those found by the
global model solution for the same location. Displacements and
rotations from the global model are imposed at the local model cut
line in a manner that produces proper bending stresses. Membrane
stresses are matched by imposing concentrated loads at appropriate
nodes in the local model (Ref. Fig. 6).
Sealant Model
Establishing sealant properties for use within the finite-element
oriented, local model also presents difficulties. The polymer sealants
used have moduli of elasticity that can vary with time, temperature,
strain rate, type of polymer, and for some, degree of elongation.
Because of the influence of these variables on material properties,
moduli or stress-strain data for various sealants are not widely
published. Thus, it was necessary to develop a method which could
provide necessary properties for use in the local model. A method for
obtaining the required properties of sealants in IG units is presented
in Chapter VI.
Other Models
IG unit behavior that is examined herein includes glass stresses
and displacements, and sealant and spacer response to service loads.
The global and local theoretical models provide most of the required
data. However, methods for modeling special types of spacer response
(e.g.f spacer migration) and complex corner effects are also addressed
24
as part of the research plan. Testing to establish empirical
variables will be necessary before these models can be used to
describe behavior of these specific segments of IG units.
Component Behavior
Glass
Glass plate response is obtained using nonlinear plate theory
(Vallabhan and Wang, 1981). Behavior that is examined includes glass
stresses from lateral pressures on the surface of the glass plates
which are simply supported. Since IG units are made up of two glass
plates separated by a sealed air space, the response of one plate with
respect to deflections of the plate opposite the sealed air space are
examined. Rectangular glass plate response to lateral pressures has
been studied extensively in recent years. Several methods of solution
are available (Al-Tayyib, 1980; Moore, 1980; Vallabhan and Wang, 1981;
Vallabhan and Ku, 1983).
Sealants
Factors influencing the behavior of the IG unit sealants are
different from those influencing the behavior of the IG unit glass
plates. The sealants seldom experience the environmental parameters
that act on the glass. Forces on the sealant are generated, in
general, by the glass plates as they respond to temperature and
pressure. Except for the direct forces across the seal detail induced
by the difference in pressure between the inside and outside of the
sealed unit, factors affecting sealant response are in the form of
25
displacements caused by the reaction of the glass plates to lateral
pressure. Because of this, the majority of sealant responses are
modeled on the basis of strain. Commonly, sealant behavior is modeled
on the basis of time and a specified strain rate (Ferry, 1980). Input
to the local model requires knowledge of sealant response to strain.
Sealant data obtained from the models are normal and shear stresses
calculated at the center of each element.
Spacers
Spacer response on a global level is a facet of IG unit behavior
that is examined by the global model. Spacers respond to glass
motions induced by temperature change and to lateral pressures induced
by forces transmitted by the sealants. Sealants not only transmit
forces, but also they restrain spacer motion induced by expansion
caused by temperature changes. Preparation of a response model for
the spacer requires consideration of effects of these various forces
and restraints. These effects include axial loading (buckling),
lateral loads (beam action), elastic supports, and end moments for
some common spacer types. Information desired from the model is
primarily displacement of the spacer within the restraining effects of
the parallel glass plates.
Corner Effects
Because many spacer styles have rigid corners (corner keys or
formed corners) the ability of the spacer to deflect in concert
with other materials is limited. This limitation r,ay cause material
26
stresses uncommon to other locations on the perimeter of the IG units.
An attempt to model this complex area with horizontal and vertical
local (cross-section) models is offered as part of the research plan.
These local models combine information from the corner grids of the
global model with additional boundary restraints in the finite element
solution (local model) to simulate the effects of the rigid spacer
corner. Expected information from this model includes displacements
and normal and shear stresses for the various materials.
Exercise of Models and Applications of Investigations
All modeled responses from the local model are based upon
linearly elastic material action only. Failure criteria must be
applied to computer results. A decision on the part of the data
interpreter must be made as to whether failure has occurred.
The final part of the research plan involves exercise of the
models to obtain information on the structural mechanics behavior of
IG units.
In format ion provided by the models ou t l ined in t h i s research plan
con t r i bu te s i g n i f i c a n t l y to the understanding of s t r u c t u r a l mechanics
response o f IG u n i t s . Imp lementa t ion o f t h i s research p rov ides
r e s u l t s t ha t can be used as a base f o r d e s i g n i n g more e f f i c i e n t and
s t r u c t u r a l l y r e l i a b l e IG u n i t s . Eventual uses include spacer c ross-
sect ion op t im i za t i on , general u n i t des ign methods, and d e t e r m i n i n g
e f f e c t s of cu r ta i n wal l r e s t r a i n t systems on the IG u n i t s .
CHAPTER V
INSULATING GLASS UNIT RESPONSE MODELS
Global Model
The global model characterizes the behavior of two individual
rectangular glass plates that are joined by a spacer along their
perimeters, enclosing a sealed air space. Lateral pressures used in
the determination of stresses and displacements in the glass plates
are the change in pressure across each glass plate brought about by
the effects of pressure within the sealed air space and pressure
changes that occur interior and exterior to the IG unit. Pressure
changes across each plate are determined by numerical methods from
imposed wind pressures, barometric pressure changes and temperatures.
This analysis method takes into account the nonlinear response of the
thin glass plates. Input parameters include changes in barometric
pressure or imposed wind pressures external to surfaces of the plates.
Pressure differences across each plate are found by an iteration
process which estimates displacements in the plates, computes changes
in volume of the sealed airspace and compares the resulting estimated
pressure with that calculated by Boyle's law. The analysis method was
first presented by Solvason (1974); Chou and Vallabhan (1985) offer a
refined analysis.
Pressure differences across glass plates obtained from the above
analysis are then put into a finite difference solved rectangular
plate program as lateral pressures (Vallabhan and Wang, 1981). Output
includes membrane and bending stresses and displacements at each node
27
28
in the finite difference discretization. Details of the method of
solution can be found in Vallabhan and Wang (1981).
Local Model
Interactions among components at the IG unit boundary are modeled
by the local model. Cross-sections normal to the edge of the IG unit
are taken at points along the boundary where the necessary input
information, from the local model, can be determined. Discretization
of the cross-section into rectangular elements prepares the model for
finite element solution (Ref. Fig. 7 ) . A typical detailed
discretization is shown in Figure 8. Discretization is purposely
coarse to reduce computer time. Each glass plate is divided down the
center in order that moments in the plate can be simulated and
membrane stress, in the form of applied concentrated forces, can be
applied along the central nodes. Bending in the spacer cross-section
was assumed small because of the small spacer thickness. Hence,
spacer discretization consists of single elements across the thickness
of the spacer material. Bending in the sealant is assumed negligible
because of relatively low sealant modulus. Sealant elements are also
single elements across their thickness.
Solution of the local model depends on correctly describing the
input variables. As mentioned above, the local model cross-section
does not extend to the center of symmetry of the IG unit plate; hence,
parameters necessary to provide similar stresses at the "cut" section
on the local model and the corresponding point on the global mo
del must be provided as input to the local model. Variables chosen
29
SECONDARY SEAL
GLASS PLATE
PRIMARY SEAL
SPACER
A & B are lines where Local Model is cut from Global Model. These lines are also the location of local model input from the global model. A
AIR SPACE
FIGURE 7. CROSS-SECTION OF IG UNIT AT TOP CENTER SHOWING LOCATION OF LOCAL MODEL
30
FIGURE 8. LOCAL MODEL DISCRETIZATION
31
to provide proper s i m i l i t u d e are d isp lacements and r o t a t i o n s a t the
c r o s s - s e c t i o n c u t l i n e ( t o r e p r e s e n t the bending s t r e s s e s ) and
concentrated loads at the nodes ( t o represent membrane s t r e s s e s ) . To
check the accuracy of t h i s s imu la t ion , moments from a loca l model run
(w i th temperature e f f ec t s omi t ted) , we're compared to moments f rom the
g l o b a l model a t the l o c a t i o n o f the l o c a l model cu t sec t ion . The
g lobal model moment was 8.3 i n . / l b s and l o c a l model moment f rom the
c u t s e c t i o n i n p u t was 7.9 i n . / l b s , a d i f f e r e n c e o f less than f i v e
p e r c e n t . Th is d i f f e r e n c e i s deemed a c c e p t a b l e , c o n s i d e r i n g t h e
r e l a t i v e l y coarse d i s c r e t i z a t i o n .
Temperature displacements ca lcu la ted in advance also may be input
at the " c u t " l i n e . With these displacements and loads appl ied to the
c ross-sec t ion the model i s solved by the method of f i n i t e elements.
Outputs produced f rom the l o c a l model are normal and s h e a r
s t r e s s e s f o r each e lement i n the d i s c r e t i z a t i o n . S t resses are
provided f o r the center of each element and are or iented to the Y and
Z axes o f t h e i n p u t c o o r d i n a t e sys tem ( R e f . F i g . 9 ) . S t ress
d i r e c t i o n s shown in Figure 9 are p o s i t i v e . L inea r , e l a s t i c response
i s assumed f o r a l l m a t e r i a l s i n the f i n i t e element r o u t i n e used.
M a t e r i a l t ype and s t r e s s e s are examined f o r each e l e m e n t and a
judgment made (based on knowledge of mater ia l p roper t ies ) to determine
i f the e lement has reached an e l a s t i c or f a i l u r e s t ress cond i t i on .
Based on t h i s judgment, po ten t i a l problem areas can be i d e n t i f i e d .
32
o ^ a *
CO
CO O (0 Vi Qi
0) CL >
t ^ *
• *
c o E .2 0
00
UJ
a: 00
A 2 O 00 N
UJ
UJ a o
o o
o z o I —
UJ
Q:
o
oo o Q.
a
•a: o
N < O o
cjs
UJ
cu
33
Spacer Model
Spacers used in IG un i t s can be examined by a proposed separa te
model. One segment of the spacer i s modeled as a beam-column on
e l a s t i c foundat ion w i th the exception tha t the springs s imulat ing the
e l a s t i c f o u n d a t i o n are changed t o Maxwell models (Ref . F i g . 1 0 ) .
R e f e r r i n g t o F i g u r e 10 , v a r i o u s l oad ings are generated by the
fo l l ow ing cond i t i ons :
1. The a x i a l l o a d i s g e n e r a t e d by c o n s i d e r i n g t h e
d i f f e r e n c e i n the c o e f f i c i e n t s o f thermal expansion
between g lass and aluminum, and by c o n s i d e r i n g the
r e s t r a i n i n g e f f e c t o f the s e a l a n t on the aluminum
expansion r e l a t i v e to glass expansion.
2. Normal, or beam, loading w i l l come from pressure w i t h i n
the u n i t , caused by temperature or barometr ic p ressure
change, or both.
3. Maxwe l l model e l a s t i c f o u n d a t i o n parameters are
determined from the r es t r a i n i ng e f f e c t o f the s e a l a n t
on the spacer i n the l a t e r a l , or normal d i r e c t i o n .
These parameters are t y p i c a l l y found by expe r imen ta l
means.
4. Moment intensity at the end of the spacer segment will
depend on the material properties of the spacer, the
rigidity of the spacer corners and the rotation at the
segment ends caused by the axial and normal loading.
34
4J c n HD
H C fO fO 0 m 4J
c >i <u
rQ E QJ .
rU > 4J QJ 0 -H U E C S D
"U u C 0) c
•H U -t-l rtJ ^
TJ Q44J rtJ to -H
M 5^ C 0)
&>-H U C 4J D
•H CQ to T: -H m C 0] 0) (D 0 U
OQ ^ 0 4
TJ ^ <U (U -P u rO fO CD 0^ ^ w u
'0 • CQ - H CD • P Cn J.J C - H <U 0) H c E i^ 0 >i 0 S rQ U
4J c fO c
H 0 (TJ - H 0) CQ CQ CQ C CQ
C
0 •p
(D D
TJ -P
O
C rH fO
•H
CQ 0 TJ 0) 0) -P fO U 0 ro
C C E ro 0)
H CQ O (U
• H CQ <W (0 X CD - H O4
»< M T J CQ
0
CD Q
O
UJ O O
a.
UJ
O
35
One additional piece of information input to the spacer model is
an initial displacement at the center (if any) obtained from the
cross-section (local) model. This displacement is caused by the slope
of the glass at the spacer due to edge rotation pinching the spacer
from above or below (Ref. Fig. 11).
Once the various materials properties related parameters have
been determined, spacer response can be found from solution of the
equation:
where:
V = displacement of beam (spacer) in y-direction
u = displacement of beam (spacer) in x-direction
k = spring stiffness
c = damping constant
g = normal load on beam
E = modulus of elasticity of beam.
I = moment of inertia of beam cross-section
P = axial loading
Equation (1) can be solved numerically by finite element or
finite difference techniques. Solution of Equation (1) is left to
future efforts. When a solution of Equation (1) is obtained, various
loadings may be examined to determine if spacer bow can be described
using this model.
36
FIGURE 11. SEALANT DEFORMATION AND SPACER DISPLACEMENT CAUSED BY ROTATION OF IG UNIT GLASS PLATES
37
Corner Ef fects Model
Examination o f c r o s s - s e c t i o n s , s i m i l a r t o those desc r ibed i n
Figures 7 and 8, near the corners of the IG un i t present an add i t iona l
cons idera t ion . Spacer corners are of ten r i g i d , and the res is tance
of the spacer segment o r thogona l t o iihe c r o s s - s e c t i o n needs t o be
taken i n t o account.
Near the edge of the u n i t the displacements and ro ta t ions of the
glass p la tes are smaller than those near the center of an edge because
of the p l a t e response near the c o r n e r s . A p r imary e f f e c t a t the
co rne r i s the d i f f e r e n c e i n p l a t e size due to thermal expansion (or
c o n t r a c t i o n ) . A one-dimensional steady s t a t e heat f l ow a n a l y s i s a t
t h e c e n t e r o f t h e u n i t and a t t h e space r r e v e a l s t h a t l a r g e
temperature d i f f e r e n c e s between the g lass p l a t e s are not uncommon
d u r i n g usua l ' mid-summer or m i d - w i n t e r days. The assumpt ion made
throughout these analyses is tha t the inner (room) a i r temperature i s
a constant 70°F due to a i r cond i t i on ing . Heat f low at the boundary of
the u n i t shows the spacer to maintain a temperature nearer tha t of the
outs ide glass p l a t e , and the spacer and outer glass p la te are assumed
t o m a i n t a i n t h e i r r e l a t i v e p o s i t i o n s d u r i n g t h e r m a l e x p a n s i o n .
Expansion o f the o u t e r g lass p l a t e and spacer whi le the inner glass
p la te remains constant w i l l cause add i t iona l st ress in the components
due t o t h e l a c k o f f l e x i b i l i t y o f t h e s p a c e r a t t h e c o r n e r .
A d d i t i o n a l s t i f f n e s s o f t h e s p a c e r a t t h e c o r n e r , due t o t h e
orthogonal spacer segment at tached, i s represented by add i t iona l nodes
attached to the spacer in the c ross -sec t ion . These nodes are assigned
38
the modulus of the spacer material and restrain its motion accordingly
(Ref. Fig. 12).
Various temperature and geometry combinations can be examined to
determine if the additional stiffness of the spacer at the corner
creates stress changes in the materials as compared to the local model
which is at the centerline of one of the sides of the unit.
The above four models used singly and in combination provide a
better understanding of the primary and secondary stress and
displacement responses of IG units.
39
iV«»i«i«.$(S«9«9i>999$«9».'«IC«fiQ»>«»$«NN;
V v ^
Oi
c
CO I
CO D CC
•goo = s§ O C ^
^ •*- ^
< «£
LU Q
o CO I -o LU LL U . LU
CL m
cc oo o — a . 31
o o C_ H -OO o
UJ - J u . <C lJ_
i< o UJ CO
- J < UJ CO > CL <
S CL CL
CO - I < O K GC UJ >
O Q
3 OO O = o oo h-
CC _J UJ UJ z : 2 : Q O Q: o •—' o 2 : I— o Q:
00 o \— \— CL.
Z UJ Q^ => U . UJ
u. o cs UJ <c t—I Q .
Q : 0 0 U. UJ o z —i
en ea: -J o <_) i-M CJ t—I •a: h -I— Q Q : UJ Z UJ Q < : >
CM
UJ a:
CHAPTER VI
MATERIAL PROPERTIES
Glass
The rectangular glass plates within an IG unit constitute the
majority of the material in the unit; hence, their behavior has a
significant effect on the behavior of the entire unit. In the global
model the behavior of individual glass plates is determined from thin
rectangular plate theory (Vallabhan and Wang, 1981). Behaviors of the
local and corner effects models are influenced by the structural
mechanics properties of constituent materials.
Glass is a brittle material whose stress-strain properties remain
essentially linear until fracture (Shand, 1984). Stress-strain
properties of glass exhibit only a slight temperature dependence. For
the range of service temperatures considered in this document (-40°F
to IIO^'F) these effects are neglected. Since glass exhibits
essentially a linear stress-strain relationship. Young's modulus
is taken as constant within a range of 10 to 10.5x10 psi.
Most theoretical models use a Young's modulus of glass of 10x10
psi. The coefficient of thermal expansion of glass is taken to be
4x10"^in./in./°F.
Spacers
The two most common spacer materials are steel and aluminum.
Both of these materials behave linearly within their elastic ranges.
Since the models described in this chapter consider only elastic
40
41
response, elastic moduli were considered sufficient for use as stress-
strain information. Young's modulus of aluminum used in the models is
10x10 psi. Aluminum properties are taken as representative values
(Birdsall, 1965). The coefficient of thermal expansion for the spacer
material used in the models is 13.x10~^ in./in./°F for aluminum
(Birdsall, 1965). Steel spacers are not used as part of this effort.
Each glass and aluminum component is assumed to be at or near a
constant temperature throughout the component; hence, each component
expands uniformly. This assumption eliminates the presence of thermal
stresses due to temperature differences within a single glass or
aluminum component.
Sealants
Sea lan ts used i n IG u n i t s i n c l u d e p o l y s u l f i d e s , s i l i cones and
hot-mel t b u t y l s . Others, such as polystyrene, are being t r i e d at t h i s
w r i t i n g . The only sealant tested f o r use herein as a r e p r e s e n t a t i v e
s e a l a n t i s " P r o - S e a l " sealant , a po l ysu l f i de . Mechanical proper t ies
o f t h i s s e a l a n t are used i n the models addressed he re i n because
i n f o r m a t i o n r e q u i r e d by the models i s a v a i l a b l e on l y from special
sealant t es ts described in t h i s chapter. Propert ies of other sealants
may be employed in these models when comparable m a t e r i a l p r o p e r t i e s
become a v a i l a b l e .
Mechanical p roper t ies of other sealants used in IG un i ts are not
r e a d i l y ava i l ab l e . A l i t e r a t u r e review y i e l d e d very l i t t l e data on
polymers tha t could be used in the t heo re t i ca l models. Hence, i t was
necessary t o deve lop a method f o r g e n e r a t i n g s e a l a n t m a t e r i a l
42
p roper t i es . A semi-empi r ica l method t o f i n d the r e q u i r e d m a t e r i a l
p r o p e r t i e s o f polymer sealants f o r use in the theo re t i ca l models was
developed.
Analysis.
Important parameters which a f f ec t the s t r e s s - s t r a i n behav ior o f
polymers are tempera tu re , s t r a i n ra te , time dependency of stress and
polymer t y p e . A s e t o f e m p i r i c a l l y based r e l a t i o n s h i p s t h a t
c h a r a c t e r i z e polymer response f o r s p e c i f i c combinat ions o f these
parameters c o n t a i n s numerous cu rves . Perhaps t h i s o b s e r v a t i o n
explains the absence of published engineering data on polymers.
Whi le master curves can be constructed to al low fo r temperature
in polymers t h a t undergo s t r e s s - r e l a x a t i o n ( W i l l i a m s , Lande l , and
Fe r r y , 1955) , a procedure to cor rec t a general polymer s t r es s - s t r a i n
curve f o r the spec i f ied fac to rs ( tempera tu re , s t r a i n r a t e , and t ime
dependency o f s t r e s s ) was not found i n a review of the l i t e r a t u r e .
Polymer s e a l a n t s t r e s s - s t r a i n i n f o r m a t i o n f o r a s p e c i f i c s e t o f
f a c t o r s i s needed f o r the prev ious ly mentioned theo re t i ca l models, A
new approach, described below, addresses t h i s problem and p rov ides
t h i s i n fo rmat ion .
Method
S t ress - re laxa t ion proper t ies of a polymer sealant are obtained by
a s imp le t e s t . S t ress - re laxa t ion proper t ies are converted to s t r ess -
s t r a i n re la t i onsh ips f o r the t e s t temperature. The conversion method
has been coded f o r computer so lu t i on and resu l t s are presented in
43
g raph i c and t a b u l a r fo rms . A l i s t i n g o f the program appears i n
Appendix A.
S t r e s s - r e l a x a t i o n t e s t i n g i s done by cas t i ng a sealant sample
between two aluminum bars (Ref. F ig . 13). A s t r e t c h i n g dev ice sepa
rates the bars, thus impart ing a f i xed elongat ion to the sealant (Ref.
F ig . 14). Instrumented steel posts maintain the separation of the bars
a f t e r the s t r e t c h i n g dev ice i s removed (Ref. F ig . 15). Compressive
s t r a i n on the s teel posts, induced by the s t r e t c h e d polymer, i s r e
corded over t ime to p rov i de s t r e s s - r e l a x a t i o n data fo r the sealant
(Ref. F ig . 16). The polymer sample size i s 1/2 x 1/2 x 2 i n . ; i t i s
elongated 25 percent or 1/8 i n . in the 1/2 i n . d i r e c t i o n . This sample
c o n f i g u r a t i o n min imizes the Poisson e f f ec t as a percentage of t o t a l
area. Tensi le s t r e s s i n the sample i s c a l c u l a t e d on the bas is of
o r i g i n a l c r o s s - s e c t i o n a l area. Dimensions of the instrumented steel
posts are 1/16 x 1/8 x 5/8 i n . S t ra in gages are mounted on oppos i t e
s ides o f each s t e e l post (Ref. F ig . 15). Compressive s t r a i n on each
post i s taken as the average of the recorded opposite side s t ra ins to
compensate f o r bending in tKe posts. Stra ins are recorded at d iscre te
t imes over an 180 hour i n t e r v a l (Ref . F i g . 16). Steel post s t r a i n
data are used to ca lcu la te stress in the polymer as a funct ion of time
by c o n v e n t i o n a l methods. D i s c r e t e p o i n t s f r om t h e a n a l o g d a t a
d e s c r i b e the s t r e s s - r e l a x a t i o n behav io r f o r the polymer s e a l a n t
tes ted .
Stress re laxa t ion data from the sealant t e s t are conver ted
to s t r e s s - s t r a i n re la t i onsh ips using Equation ( 2 ) , and a computer
44
FIGURE 13. CASTING THE STRESS-RELAXATION TEST SAMPLE
FIGURE 14. STRAINING DEVICE ATTACHED TO STRESS-RELAXATION TEST SAMPLE
45
FIGURE 15. AN INSTRUMENTED STEEL POST
FIGURE 16. RECORDING OF RELAXATION DATA
46
program. Equation (2), from Nielsen (1962), calculates stress as a
function of strain.
a(e) = E^e + K xHdnx) (1-e""/^") d I m (2) '-00
where:
a = tensile stress in psi
e = strain
E = rubbery flow modulus in psi
K =
T =
strain rate in inches per hour
relaxation time, hours
H(InT) = increment of distribution of relaxation times
Evaluation of Equation 2 within the computer program begins by
input of the discrete stress-time values from the experimental test
into the program. A polynomial (first to sixth order) or exponential
curve is fit to the discrete points by the program. The distribution
of relaxation times (H[ln(T)]) is obtained from the fitted curve using
a second order numerical differentiation routine (Ketter and Prawel,
1969) and Andrews' Second Order Method (Andrews, 1952; Tobolsky,
1960), represented by Equation (3).
H.a(^) -1
77303 dEr(t) dlogt + 0.109 d^Er(t)
dlogt^ (3)
where: -'t = T -'t = T
Ho (T) = distribution of relaxation time ordinate for time 2a^
Er = relaxation modulus
H ( T ) = H(lnT) for single relaxation times (Tobolsky, 1960)
47
At specif ied increments of t ime, e longat ion is converted to s t r a i n
through Equation (4) from the theory of rubber e l as t i c i t y (Treolar,
1958).
z = 1/3 (^r (4)
where:
L = initial length of material 0 L = final length of material
Change in strain is divided by the time increment to obtain
strain rate. With this information the program evaluates Equation (2)
using a linear numerical Lagrangian integration routine (Ketter and
Prawel, 1969) to obtain a stress from each incremental value of
strain. Increments of I m = 0.1 combined with strain increments of
0.01 provide sufficient accuracy while maintaining program run time at
acceptable levels. Stress as a function of strain can be evaluated,
by the program, up to elongations of approximately 300 percent
(strains of approximately 100 percent).
Figure 17 contains a sample of the computer generated output.
Experimental points and the fitted curve vs. log time are shown in the
upper left quadrant. The curve fit shown is exponential and becomes
asymptotic near the rubbery flow modulus. Data points grouped near
the 28 psi stress and the 100 hour time indicate that this sealant
exhibits a rubbery flow modulus; hence, the curve should have zero
slope past these points. Averaging the stress values of these grouped
points and dividing the result by the fixed strain produced tne
48
UJ
/^ H (/> Q.
(/J 3 -J D a o 3;
- U J
<s
en
UJCJOXOCnOr-'^ —OOLOCMCDCDO TTcococoeocjcMcu oxocn
lUt-
s o
<:
o
OC9C9 OC3G C9QOOOC9 •^•^CKOcncncvJcvjcvj 0(0<n
s
o
o
W
UJ UJ> H 3
I /-> > 7)
1 3
(9
0.:= >-'M V ) 0 (/)Q. UJ QC< • - ) -I /5<
Q
f
f
• ^
3 -
: -0)
^ j a .
O (S
lOOLO(SLOOtJ)Sl/}(SLOOU)<S r-r-<OU3L0WTTC0CnCU<M U)
o
a.
0 0
IS <s
U}<SU)aL0C3U>aU)<9l/}SL0(S
49
rubbery flow modulus value used in Equation (1). Modulus vs. log time
is obtained by dividing fitted curve values by the fixed strain from
the simplified stress-relaxation test and the result is shown in the
upper right quadrant of Figure 17. A plot-of the distribution of
relaxation times is given in the lower left quadrant and stress as a
function of strain for the temperature of the simplified stress-
relaxation test and the specified strain rate is in the lower right
quadrant of Figure 17.
Other equations that convert stress relaxation data to stress-
strain relationships, for polymers, were considered. One such
equation is reported by Ferry (1980):
a(t) = k H(l-e"^/'') d Inx + E kt (5) V _oo
and has a constant value for the distribution of relaxation times (H).
Another equation, also from Ferry (1980), is of the Duhamel integral
type.
a(t) = k E(t-T) dx •'o
(6)
These equations f i n d st ress as a func t ion of t ime and can r e a d i l y be
conver ted t o s t r e s s - s t r a i n by mu l t i p l y i ng the time axis values by the
s t r a i n r a t e , K. Equat ion (2 ) was chosen f o r t h e s t r e s s - s t r a i n
conversion because i t re la tes stress d i r e c t l y to s t r a i n . S t ra in i s a
mo re common parameter in a structural mechanics system than time.
50
V e r i f i c a t i o n
V e r i f i c a t i o n of the s t r ess - re l axa t i on , s t r e s s - s t r a i n convers ion
program was conducted on a two -pa r t po l ysu l f i de base sealant, brand
name " P r o - S e a l . " A p o r t i o n o f the mixed sea lan t was cas t i n the
s t r e s s - r e l a x a t i o n dev i ce desc r i bed above and the remainder cas t
between glass p lates coated wi th re lease agent . Samples were cured
fo r two days at room temperature. Bone shaped tes t pieces were cut
from the sealant cast between the glass plates (Ref. F ig . 18). These
bone shaped t e s t specimens were to be used to check the accuracy o f
the program generated s t r e s s - s t r a i n informat ion which used data from
the sealant in the s t ress - re laxa t i on d e v i c e . Four bone shaped t e s t
p ieces were cu t w i t h gage lengths of 4.32, 2.9, 1.8 and 1.8 inches.
An Inst ron t e s t i n g machine provided force-deformat ion i n f o r m a t i o n f o r
a constant e longat ion ra te of two inches per minute on the bone shaped
t e s t p i e c e s . C o n v e r s i o n o f f o r c e de fo rma t ion t o s t r e s s - s t r a i n
in format ion f o r the t e s t pieces used the same p r i n c i p l e s as used i n
the computer program. S t r e s s - r e l a x a t i o n data from the t e s t device
were input to the program and resu l t s generated. Inst ron and program
resu l t s are p l o t t ed f o r comparison in Figure 19.
Results
P r e d i c t e d va lues f rom the s t r e s s - r e l a x a t i o n tes ts var ied less
than ten percent from t e s t values obtained from the I n s t r o n t e s t s on
the 2 .9 i n . and 1.8 i n . gage l e n g t h samples and are approximately
cen t ra l to the range of Ins t ron values up to s t r a i n s o f approx
i m a t e l y 0 .8 (Ref . F i g . 19). Var ia t ions between predicted and tested
51
FIGURE 18. INSTRON TEST SAMPLE
52
H
04
CQ CQ Q) U •P
cn
200
150
100
50
o|
/ •
a / •
/
P / z? / . ' / >
a//
d J 1 y
/ / / •''y
I/// j /i S t r e s s vs
p - ^ P r e d i c t e d and
f \
i / i /
/j^ ^ y / z / jm *
yf »" mi ^ T t *
/ i *
f / / ^^^ / / •
/ / / / / /
/ if
0 4 . 3 2 " GL
a 2 .90" GL • 1 .80" GL • 1 .80" GL
— P r e d i c t e d
S t r a i n Sample T e s t s
i 1
0 .5 1 .0
S t r a i n ( I n . / I n . )
1 .5
FIGURE 19. PREDICTED AND TESTED STRESS-STRAIN RESULTS FOR "PRO-SEAL" SEALANT
53
stress-strain data suggest that the prediction curve may not be
accurate above strains of 100 percent (Ref. Fig. 19).
Application
Most polymer strain rates in IG units can be determined from the
controlling motions of the more massive and stiffer glass and spacer
materials. Thermal expansion and displacement-rotation response to
pressure for the glass and spacer materials tend to control the
deformation response of the polymer. Estimation of times required for
these motions provides elongation rates that can be entered into the
program to provide polymer stress-strain data for the specific polymer
being examined.
One application where polymer response is not dependent on
motions of the stiffer materials is the case of a vertical plate
attached top and bottom by a polymer sealant/adhesive (Ref. Fig. 20).
The example considered is a weightless, rigid rectangular plate
supported along the top and bottom by the "Pro-Seal" sealant that was
tested. (This is not a recommendation for using this sealant in this
manner. However, since it is the only sealant tested using the above
method, it is used in the example.) Lateral loading on the plate is
an assumed 50 psf lasting three seconds. Plate height is 60 inches
and a one inch wide strip is used for calculation. Polymer supports
are 1/4 of an inch high by 1/8 of an inch thick. Using symmetry, half
of the plate height is used in the computations.
Describing the response of this system, using the principles
presented in this paper, requires assuming a polymer modulus. An
54
Rigid, Sealant Support weightless rectangular plate
1/4' (6.35 mm)
FIGURE 20. VERTICAL PLATE WITH TOP AND BOTTOM SEALANT SUPPORTS
55
assumed modulus value can be selected from the modulus vs. time plot
generated by the program. Using this modulus value and the applied
load, an elongation of the polymer support is obtained. Dividing this
elongation by load duration gives an elongation rate that is entered
into the program and results generated. A new modulus value is
obtained from the generated stress-strain information. In this
instance the new modulus is 184 psi. Using the new modulus a new
elongation rate is calculated, entered into the program and the
process repeated.
After the first iteration in this example there was practically
no change in the modulus value in subsequent iterations. This
occurrence led to the examination of modulus variations for various
elongation rates. Several program runs were made using different
elongation rates and the results of modulus vs. elongation rate are
shown in Figure 21. Polymer stress-strain plots are often nonlinear
and the modulus vs. elongation rate is also shown for various strains
in Figure 21.
Elongation rates for the example are in the 10 inches per hour to
100 inches per hour range. Modulus vs. elongation rate varies less
that one psi in this range; hence, the rapid convergence of the
modulus value. Figure 21 is an important tool for determining the
material response of the polymer when elongation rates must be
estimated.
56
c •f-4
fO u AJ CO
1^ o o i H
c •m rtJ ^ JJ
c/:
i n a r-i
o o fN4
o H
o •
o o
r o
13
c 'M (tJ u 4J cn 0 ^
in CN
c • i H
^ }^ JJ
w 0 ^
O i n
c •f-4
03 5-1 +J cn
i n
r
r H
o (
o
o a: H
O
r-i
o O O O
o
u
o
c
Q 4J (C a c o -.J
c 0
rH
_ j < UJ oo
•a: UJ oo
I o a: Q.
o
cn oo
Z UJ o t— ^ <: I— Q: •a: o z z • - • o <c _ j cn UJ I—
oo •
oo oo =» :z) o oo •—' - J -sC
o O I—
UJ cn C3
(ISd) sninpow
57
Work in Progress
Equation (2) does not consider variations in the stress-strain
properties due to changes in temperature. These variations are
presently being incorporated into the program using the method
presented by Smith (1956). Other improvements include a technique to
input a sketched curve directly into the program by digitizing (thus
eliminating the need for a curve fit), reading strain data directly
into the program for conversion to stress, and incorporation of a
fracture criterion to predict adhesive and cohesive failure.
CHAPTER V I I
PARAMETRIC STUDIES
As stated i n Chapter IV, the primary purpose of t h i s research is
t o deve lop models which can be used t o character ize the s t r u c t u r a l
mechanics behavior of IG u n i t s . Use of the models and t h e i r behavior
are demonst ra ted by pa rame t r i c s tud ies . Local models (described in
Chapter V) are used to examine mater ia l stresses and e f fec ts on these
s t r e s s e s i n d u c e d by s e l e c t e d a l t e r a t i o n s i n spacer and s e a l a n t
geometries and mater ia l p r o p e r t i e s . St resses examined are maximum
s t r e s s e s i n l o c a l models f o r each m a t e r i a l con ta ined in the u n i t .
M a t e r i a l s used i n the s p e c i f i c examples presented are l i m i t e d t o
g l a s s , aluminum spacer , and a po l ysu l f i de sealant . IG un i ts are not
l im i t ed to these mater ia ls , however. Any number o f m a t e r i a l s may be
s p e c i f i e d and each m a t e r i a l can be d e f i n e d as hav ing i so t r op i c or
a n i s o t r o p i c p r o p e r t i e s . A n i s o t r o p i c p r o p e r t i e s a re l i m i t e d t o
orthogonal planes in the elements.
Select ion of Reference Evaluation Condit ion
E s t a b l i s h i n g a re fe rence point or "datum" f o r use in evaluat ing
resu l t s of parametric studies i s an essent ia l f i r s t step. Cond i t i ons
used t o e s t a b l i s h t h i s datum a re r e f e r r e d t o as " S c e n a r i o s . "
Scenar ios are c o n s t r u c t e d i n o rder t o d e f i n e se ts o f " r easonab l y
expected extreme cond i t i ons " which may create s i g n i f i c a n t stresses in
component m a t e r i a l s . Reasonably expected extreme c o n d i t i o n s are
58
59
defined as environmental conditions that an IG unit could experience
at some location within the continental United States during the span
of a year. Each set of conditions which are combined to form a
Scenario may not occur at the same location during the year, however.
Conditions from each Scenario are input'to the local model and results
are generated. Output from each Scenario is examined to determine
which set of conditions produced the largest stresses in the spacer
and sealant. Glass stresses are not considered as a basis for
determining the reasonably expected extreme conditions since they are
best described by the global model. In addition, glass stresses from
local model Scenarios were found to be small when compared to expected
failure stresses of glass.
Conditions for each Scenario are given as follows:
Scenario I. Assumes the IG unit is assembled and sealed at
mean sea level (MSL) at a temperature of 70°F. The unit is
transported to an installation site at an elevation of 6000
ft above MSL, thus causing a corresponding barometric
pressure decrease of three psi exterior to the unit. After
installation, the temperature exterior to the unit rises to
110°F. Finally, a positive (inward acting) wind pressure of
35 psf is applied to the unit.
Scenario II. The same as Scenario I except a negative
(outward acting) wind pressure of 25 psf is experienced
outside of the outer glass plate.
60
Scenario III. Assumes the IG unit is assembled at an
elevation of 6000 ft above MSL and is then transported to
sea level for installation, thus subjecting the unit to an
exterior barometric pressure increase of three psi. After
installation temperature exterior to the unit decreases to
-40°F. A positive wind pressure of 35 psf is experienced
outside of the outer glass plate.
Scenario IV. Same as Scenario III except a 25 psf negative
wind pressure is experienced outside of the outer glass
plate.
In each scenario the unit is assumed to be in an installed
configuration and the temperature interior to the unit is maintained
at a constant temperature of 70°F by an air conditioning system.
Individual glass plates of the IG units are first analyzed using
the global model for overall responses to pressure. Pressures acting
across each glass plate are obtained using one of the methods for
analyzing pressure differences across glass plates in IG units (Chou
and Vallabhan, 1985; Solvason, 1974). In addition, dimensional
changes in the outer glass plate caused by temperature are calculated.
Thermal expansion is determined using the entire height (or width) of
the outer glass plate as it is assumed that the IG unit is resting on
a setting block and that all dimensional changes are referenced to the
bottom of the unit. Displacements and rotations obtained from the
global models and thermal displacements obtained as noted above are
input to the local model and resulting stresses in the elements are
61
calculated. This procedure is followed for each Scenario and the
results compared. Comparisons are based on the maximum tensile
stresses in the aluminum spacer and in the sealant. Glass stresses
were examined and found not to be a criteria; hence, they are not used
as a criteria on determining the datum condition.
Evaluations of Seal Details
Local model runs are based on an IG unit that is 67 inches high
by 59 inches wide. Each glass plate is 0.,250 in. thick and the
insulating air space is 0.500 in. wide. Assumed glass modulus is
10x10 psi. Datum conditions are obtained using a 1/2x1/2 in. spacer
that is cold formed from 0.022 in. thick aluminum. Spacers are
constructed so that the cold forming seam faces the sealed airspace of
the IG unit. Spacer seams are occasionally welded. When the seam is
welded it is assumed to act as a continuous cross-section in the local
model. When spacer seams are not welded, they are referred to as
"split" spacers. Aluminum spacer material is assumed to have a
modulus of 10x10 psi and a yield strength of 10,000 psi. Spacer
lengths are 1/4 in. less than the dimensions of the glass, leaving a
1/8 in. channel around the perimeter of the IG unit that is filled
with sealant. This structural seal is called the secondary seal.
Secondary seals not only seal the perimeter of the units but hold the
unit together. Local models considered herein have an optional
"primary" seal that coats the vertical sides of the spacer. This seal
is assumed to be 1/32 in. thick and coats the entire vertical side of
the aluminum spacer.
62
As presented in Chapter VI, sealant moduli are strain rate
dependent. Deciding on a sealant modulus value presented some
difficulty because of the time dependence of values for sealant
modulus. Selecting a definite sealant modulus would require the
assumption of a specific and possibly transient set of loading
conditions. Effects of loading (and strain) rate are examined by
selecting the upper and lower bound sealant modulus values from
Chapter VI and running a set of local model Scenarios for each bound
of the sealant modulus. In this manner upper and lower bounds on
response stresses can be determined and differences evaluated.
Sealant moduli selected are 250 psi for the upper bound and 150 psi
for the lower bound. Resulting largest stresses for the various
Scenarios are found in Tables 1 and 2. Primary and secondary sealants
are usually different polymers. In this document they are the same,
since Chapter VI results are based on the single polymer tested.
Scenarios III and IV were not applied to the split spacer. The
reason for this is that these Scenarios caused inward deflection of
the two glass plates (toward each other), thus placing the inward
portion of the split spacer in compression along the central portion
of each side of the IG unit. A "master-slave" routine, which
prohibits element crossing, is not included for the element type used
in the finite element program. Since element crossing would occur at
the location of the split in Scenarios III and IV, the results were
not realistic and are not considered.
Stresses ordered by magnitude and material type for the various
spacer-scenario combinations are shown in Appendix B. A summary of
63
•9: PLd SSPL6 j8:;no o: paLLddc eunssBjd 6uLq.oe pjPMt no j.sd 92 t^daoxe j j j OLJBUBDS ^^ ^'^^S—suoL:n.puo3 [B:^U9QJUOJLAU3 A I OLJPUQDS^
•eq- Ld SSBL6 jeq.no eqc o: pei-LddB j.sd g£ J.0 ejnssejd puLM 6UL:^DIB pjPMUj -J^Q^ ^^ peuLBt uieuj SL ejn^^Bjadiue: J0LJ9^UL SLJ-qM jjjOfr- 0^ saseajoep ajn^Bjedmat^ JOLJ9:^X3 '^Lun eqi O: J0LJ9:^Xe 9SB9wlD9p 9 jnSS9Jd DLj:^9llJ0JBq LSd £ SULSnCO L9A9L B9S UB9m 0^ p9q.w^odsul J: ^LUp "doOZ ^L 9jn:^pj9duj9:^ U9LJM -JS ^ 9AoqB -^^j. 0009 :^e p9 [e9S pUC p9LqUJ9SSB t^LUn—SUOLt^ipUOQ L P : ^ U 9 1 U U 0 J L A U 3 m 0LJeU9DSg
•9^B[d sse[6 j9^no o: p9L[ddB j.sd g^ ^o 9jnss9jd puLM 5uLq.Di? pjCM^no :^d90x9 * i 0Ljeu9Ds SP 9iijes—suoi^^Lpuo^ LP:^U9UJU0JLAU3 I I 0LjeU9DS3
•9q.B[d SSPL6 j9:^no o^ p9LLddB j.sd 99 ^0 9jnss9ad puLM 6uLq.DB pjeMUi '^^Qi %^ p9ULnuLPiu SL 9jn:;Bj9duj9:^ J0LJ9: UL 9[LL|M j^OLL ^^ S9SM 9jn:^BJ9dui9:^ J0LJ9:;X3 '^^lun gq: o^ J0LJ9q.X9 9SP9J09P 9jnSS9jd 0Ljq.9UJ0JBq LSd £ 6ULSnBD U0L^BA9[9 QQQQ o: p9q.jodsuBj:^ t Lup 'doOL s|. 9jn:^Bj9duj9:^ u9qM ( isw) L9A9L e9S 'uceuj "^^ p9[e9S puB p9Lqm9SSB :n.un—suoL:;Lpu03 L'^^U9UJUOJLAU3 I OLJBU9DS^
21 2
21 I
8^ S9
99 I
9e 21 59 n 62 I 9e
3-DOT
r"e£-ri62-0'L2LZl-
L'tl-rZ99-e'esoe-9*1-9*826-S'OSS-
9*9frfr-r£L88-
z*o-2 > 8 2 -Z'tSl-
Z*8-6'L2t-i'OZSV-
"dUIOQ
s(22S) [6UU0| UO
9S I
- SS
62 2 9e
9S 99 9£
2L 2
52 99 9£
2L 2 LZ
s'ooT
8*01 8*9L6 O'OetEL
9'1 0*2U 0*SL£2
Z'n 6 "5801 8*£^*2
e*£69 9'0Z.Z8
6*t rzzt E*Z69£
f OL Z*9C9 e'OLBZ
•suaj_
t^38Jtp-2
21
55
21 IE 55
E2 55
95 LE U
2 1 6t
95 OS
g-ooT
3dAI SS3aiS
5't^-E'2iL-0*EL82l'
8'OE-6*55-Z*06W-
r9E5l-
f O l -fr'8Z-2*806Z-
E'L-0'8E-S"S2Z-
f 8 l -Z'8fr-0*£Li5-
•doioj
s(US) ! [CUUO(j U0|
95 LE
- 11
62 E2 LI
95 LE
2L EL 55
52 LE
2 1 E l 92
9*301
6*12 S*2EL 0'L69ll
9*L E'O* 9*6622
L*2E 6*E^ t*8^frL
2*M 0*8E 6*0998
O'Ll t*2E 9* ELE
Z'ZZ Z'ZZ 2'S8E8
*SU8J_
SSP19 unu{.ajn[v
ssPLS uinu|.ufn[y
SSBL9
ss«L9 uinu).uini y
[BMB BW
(j83VdS P8P[8M)
.AI
(jsDeds P8P18M) ,111
(.jsseds P8P18M)
(j83eds f»Pl»*)
(j83VdS
(jd3«ds ^Uds)
OMvuao^
smncow INVIV3S isd OSL ONisn soiyvN3DS yod S3ss3yis iS39yvi JO Ayvwwns
L 3navi
64
TABLE 1—Continued
STRESS nPE
Pos.
406.2 156.7
160.0 164.5
1.9
584.5 152.0
229.7 85.9
3.8
304.0 38.3
5.3
556.1 113.3 26.2
Shear Stress (S12)5
Loc.^
26 65
27 65 29
n 65
44 66 43
55 58 51
45 14 51
Neg.
-273.0 -149.2 -10.5
-206.9 -138.6
-369.8 -159.9
-17.4
-328.4 -30.7 -0.1
-324.0 -124.7
-705.9 -121.5
Loc.^
32 66 55
36 66
45 66 46
55 42 29
44 23
11 23
Maximum Principal Stress (SMAX)
Tens.
3411.0 637.9 29.0
3713.0 474.2
11.3
8779.0 694.8 54.5
2492.0 1092.7
32.7
2315.3 712.0
3.0
13469.0 917.7 42.7
Loc.°
26 2
12
36 66 25
54 2
12
36 66 56
36 2
29
36 1
56
CompJ
-1483.2 -44.6 -2.5
-17.0 -2.2 -0.4
-2251.9 ^ 4 . 3 -0.4
-379.6 -4.2 -0.5
-886.9 -36.2 -13.6
-2979.6 -51.3 -32.8
Loc.^
44 50 25
19 2
37
36 50 28
55 7
37
54 16 12
54 21 12
Minimum Principal Stress (SMIN)
Tens.
1972.9 12.3 4.6
958.3 11.9 4.6
2074.6 32.9 24.0
768.1 18.9 13.6
651.3 9.2 0.3
3441.5 32.1 0.7
locj
25 13 12
36 21 25
54 13 12
36 16 56
11 50 28
36 30 28
Comp.
-5750.4 -422.4
-25.1
-756.2 -358.9
-2 .3
-S839.9 -447.4
-25.1
-1629.4 -928.7
-3 .5
-3096.8 -664.3
-30.9
-12816.0 -900.6
-75.0
Loc.«
44 1
56
34 65 12
36 1
56
55 65 38
54
12
55 2
12
5See Figure 9 for orientation and positive directions of stresses
within element.
^See Figure 8.
65
M ; , .„
y
•9:^PLd SSCL6 j9:^no o: p9LLddP 9 jnss9Jd 5 U L ; D P pjPMino i s d 92 :^d9DX9 I I I 0Meu9Ds se 9iues—suoL^LpuoQ L^ugujuojLAU3 AI OLjeugos^
'B%T9[6 sse[6 j9: ;no 9 q ; o: p9Lidde i s d 9e :^o 9 j n s s 9 j d puLM BuLt^oe pjPMUi - j ^oz ^B p9ULnuLBiu sL 9jn:^Bj9dui9:; JOLJS^UL 9LLMM J^Ot^- 0% S9SBajD9p 9jnt^eJ9dllJ9:^ J0LJ9:;X3 -^^Lun 9u:^ O: J 0 U 9 : ^ X 9 9SB9JD9p 9 j n s S 9 j d DLj:^9UJ0Jeq LSd £ SULSneo I 9 A 9 I B 9 S UP9UJ
o:^ p9 :^ jodsuB j : t :^Lun -J^OZ SL 9jn:^ej9dm9:^ uai M isw ^Aoqe -t^i QOOQ : B p9[e9s pue p9LquJ9SSB c^Lun—suoL:^Lpuo3 L^^U9iuuoj LAU3 m O M e u g o g .
•9:^PLd SSBL6 j9:^no 0:; p9LLddB ^sd 93 ^0 9 j n s s 9 j d puiM 6UL:^DP pjPM:^no t;d9DX9 ' I OLJPU90S SP 9UJPS —SUOLttLpuOQ [ BC^UaUJUOj L AU3 H 0LjeU9DS3
'9:^e[d sse[6 j9:^no o: p9L[ddB j.sd 9e i o 9 j n s s 9 j d puLM 5UL: ;DP puPMui - J ^ Q Z ^^ p9ULe:^uLBm SL 9jn:^Bj9duj9:^ jOLjs^^UL 9LLMM j ^ O L L 0^ S9SLJ 9jnt^PJ9diu9:^ J0LJ9^X3 "^Lun 9q:^ o:^ J0LJ9^X9 9SP9JD9P 9 jnSS9 jd DLJ^SUiOJeq LSd £ SULSnCD U 0 L : ^ B A 9 I 9 0009 o: p9:^jodsuej:^ :^Lun 'doOl SL 9jn:^Bj9duj9:^ u9qM ( i s ^ ) 1^'^B[ P 9 S 'UP9IU
: B p9Le9S pup p9[qiiJ9SSP :n.un—suoLt^LpuoQ [B:^U9UJUOJLAU3 I OLJPU9DS^
21 2
21 I
8E 59 frE
95 I 9E
21 59
62 I 9E
9*301
E * E ^ 9*2E6-0*25Etl-
1*61-t*9t9-6*Ef9E-
8*2-9*92Ll-l *W5-
5*2- • 1*59*^ 9*9W6-
f L-l'ZLZ-E*E28-
8*01-5 * * 2 ^ 2*MES-
•duio3
95 t
- 9E
62 59 9E
95 99 9E
21 2 *5
52 99 9E
21 2 LZ
9*301
^*8 2*6E6 0*925tt
Z'i I'lZL I'LiSZ
6*02 0*5821 2*Z892
l*2E E*02A E*S586
Z*9 8*L25 9*886E
8*01 i'9t9 t'62L2
•SU8J_
s(22S) ss8j^s
2L El 55
21 LE 55
8E E2 55
95 LE LL
21 6t St
52 OS n
5-DO-]
1
3 d A l S53UIS
8*96-9*6^-0*L5LVl-
2 * 8 t -2*19-2*9L82-
l*E-0*L2-2**E9L-
2 * ^ V'Ll' 5*2288-
8*2-L'LZ-t'OLi-
5*22-l*L5-8*2999-
•dUIOQ
95 LE 11
82 ZZ LI
95 LE
n 21 EL 55
52 LE
Zl zt 92
9*301
8'SL 6'2EL O'ZOOEL
2*2 rzt 6'95SZ
9'Lt 0*t8 1*5151
S'U Z*Et 1*0856
2*51 2*8E 6*82EE
t'VZ 1*52 9'ilH
•suej^
s ( l L S ) s s a j ^ S [euuorg UO 1.^08.41. p>;^
ssPLD
3up[e82 ssPLS
iunu(.iun[y
^ue[e8^ S"LS
uinu),uiniy
^UP CS SSS19
uinuLun^y
sspts uinu iun y
^UCIV8£ ssPLD
uinu ttin y
[BMS^BK
papiaM) .AI
(j83SdS P8P18M)
£ l l f
(jsoeds papIa")
(j838dS P8PI»M)
(jascds ; H d s )
(jaseds
0I.JVU33S
smnaow INVIV3S isd 0S2 aoj oiyvN3DS AS S3ss3yis iS39yvi 30 Ayvwwns
Z 318V1
r-Pv.- .. = — .
66
TABLE 2—Continued
STRESS nPE
Pos.
431.4 156.7
173.3 167.5
2.1
679.3 156.2
245.5 94.1 3.9
342.3 35.5
5.9
614.3 109.4 28.5
Shear Stress (S12)2
Loc.s
26 65
27 65 29
11 65
44 66 43
55 58 51
27 14 51
Neg.
-312.4 -149.2 -12.0
-223.0 -135.6
-390.8 -155.6 -18.9
-397.1 -33.1 -0.1
-334.4 -130.8
-329.7 -130.4
Loc.^
32 66 56
36 66
45 66 46
55 42 29
44 23
11 23
Majclmua Principal Stress (SMAX)
Tens.
9443.8 647.6 31.2
4005.5 555.6 15.4
9905.8 722.0 71.8
2707.3 1292.0
48.0
2603.6 733.6
4.2
14567.0 940.2 40.5
Loc.s
26 2
12
36 66 25
54 2
12
36 66 56
11 65 43
36 1
56
Comp.
-1668.1 -47.3
-4 .0
-21.7 -3 .7 -0.6
-2447.9 -40.5
^ . 3
-406.3 ^ . 4 -1.0
-1092.5 -40.1 -19.0
-3412.0 -54.5 -42.3
Loc '
44 50 25
19 50 37
36 50 28
55 7
37
54 16 12
54 16 12
Ml
Tens.
2217.3 18.8 4.0
1057.2 14.1 6.4
2398.9 39.6 31.9
828.7 24.3 20.5
765.9 8.4 0.5
3730.3 30.5 1.2
nlmun Stress
Loc.°
26 13 12
36 21 25
54 13 12
10 16 56
n 47 28
36 30 28
Principal (SMIN)
Comp,
-6696.4 -425.0
-28.9
-825.5 -435.9
-3.3
-9575.1 -466.0 -22.1
-1762.6 -1126.6
-6.3
-3660.7 -647.3 -43.2
-14367.0 -935.7 -97.2
Loc.'
44 1
25
34 65 12
36 1
56
55 65 38
54 1
12
54 2
12
^See Figure 9 for o r i e n t a t i o n and pos i t i ve d i rec t ions of stresses within element.
^See Figure 8.
67
largest stresses for the various component materials and Scenarios are
given in Tables 1 and 2. From these tables of ordered stresses,
Scenario IV with a welded spacer is chosen as the reasonably expected
extreme conditions for reasons which follow.
Parametric Studies
An examination of Tables 1 and 2 led to the selection of Scenario
IV with a sealant modulus of 150 psi as the datum condition for
subsequent parametric studies. This decision is based on the large
spacer stress results in this Scenario. Tensile sealant stresses are
also considered significant. Scenario IV with the 150 psi sealant
modulus has the largest tensile sealant stresses with the exception of
Scenario I (welded spacer). Neither Scenario sealant stress,
regardless of modulus, was near the assumed adhesion or cohesion
failure stress of 200 psi. Because of these low stresses Scenario IV
with the 150 psi sealant modulus was considered acceptable as a datum
condition for sealant stresses as well. The 150 psi sealant modulus
for Scenario IV was chosen because in this Scenario the maximum
tensile stresses for the sealant decreased for the 250 psi sealant
modulus while compressive sealant stresses increased. Due to the low
sealant modulus, compressive sealant failure is considered unlikely.
Once Scenario IV conditions for the local model were chosen as a
reference point or datum, the next step was to vary other parameters
to determine their effects on spacer and sealant stresses. Spacer
geometry is varied first. Basic geometric shapes of spacers are
examined using the input of Scenario IV. Shapes chosen are a circle.
68
triangle, and trapezoid. Two other shapes are considered: an invert
ed "T" shaped spacer and an idealized spacer shape meant to resemble
many spacers used in IG units at this time (Ref. Figs. 22-26). As
spacer geometry changed, the sealant is assumed to fill the space
outside of the spacer around the pertmeter of the IG unit. Sealant
geometry was changed also to ensure that the unit is sealed against
vapor penetration and for structural integrity. In many of the spacer
configurations a primary seal, as such, could not be defined. This
fact is not expected to affect results because the same polymer
properties are assumed for both primary and secondary seals in the
models. Aluminum spacer material of 0.022 in. thickness remained the
same throughout the parametric studies. Comparisons of the largest
spacer and sealant stresses for the parametric studies using Scenario
IV as are shown in Table 3.
Effects of sealant depth on spacer and sealant stresses are
examined using Scenario IV input and the square welded spacer.
Sealant depth is varied from 1/16 in. to 1/2 in. with the 1/8 in.
sealant depth of Scenario IV used as datum. Above the 1/8 in. sealant
depth, the depth of sealant is varied in 1/8 in. increments to 1/2 in.
the 1/2 in. square welded spacer dimensions are held constant (except
for spacer locations below the top of the IG unit) during variation of
sealant depth. Results of the depth of sealant tests using the local
model are compared in Table 4. These results are discussed in Chapter
VIII.
69
FIGURE 22. CIRCULAR SHAPED SPACER DISCRETIZATION
70
FIGURE 23. TRIANGULAR SHAPED SPACER DISCRETIZATION
71
FIGURE 24. TRAPEZOID SHAPED SPACER DISCRETIZATION
72
FIGURE 25. INVERTED "T" SHAPED SPACER DISCRETIZATION
73
FIGURE 26. "STANDARD" SPACER DISCRETIZATION
74
'92 9Jn6Lj 999g
•92 9 j n 6 L j 9995
•t72 9 j n 6 L j 999^
•£2 9 j n 6 L j 999£
' l l 9 j n 6 L j 999^
•9:^P[d SSCL6 j9q.n0 9i q. o: p9LLddB j.sd 93 ^0 9 j n s s 9 j d puLw SuL^^oe pjeM^^ng "JoOZ ^^ p9ULe:^ULeuj SL 9jn:^Bj9duj9:^ J 0 L J 9 ^ U L 9LLqM j ^ j O t ' " 0^ S9se9«iD9p 9Jn:^eJ9duj9:^ j 0 L J 9 : ; x 3 "t^Lun ^\\'\ O:; J0LJ9^X9 9Se9JD9p 9jnSS9jd DLJ^9m0JCq LSd £ SULSnPO L9A9L B9S o:; p9q.J0dsuBj:^ :H.un "JoOZ SL 9jn:^BJ9duj9^ U9L|M 19^^ 9AoqB "\^ 0009 : P p9[B9S pUC p9[qLU9SSB ^LUn SUOL^LpuOQ [P: U911JU0J LAU3 /\ I 0LJPU909^
z\ 2 E5
21 2 51
Et 2 LZ
2L 2 t5
9t 2 •5
21 2 t5
e'Do-i
8*9L-t*9^8-5*8Lt^
6*t2-t*EE8-E*5fr52-
0*E-
t*fr0L2-
0*11-f L t e -t*82L2-
9*221-2*f96-E*Z2ZE-
E*EE-Z*Z68-0*Z8Z2l-
•dui03 g
95 L OL
89 I 59
52 I 9E
52 I 01
02 Ll OL
95 L 9E
•00-]
E*8 9'L2Z 9*frL2
5*6 8*099 l*WZ2
Z*Z L*S0Z 9*E502
5*9 2'09Z Z*28LL
6*11 2*E9Z 6*E9Z2
8*0L 8'9L6 O'OEtEl
•suej^
^(22S) ssaj:^s l«uuo|g uo;.^38j).p-2
2L 9 1
ts 02 ZZ ZL
2L OS ZZ
2L El 55
21 EL LZ
21 El 55
e*=°1
•
3<iU S53211S
o*ot-9*851-5*ESS-
8'Z-t*82 l -1**822-
9*22-8*89-f L 0 2 2 -
2*9E-Z*8E-2*6E0E-
6*95-B*t9-Z*2L9E-
5*frZ-Z'ZL-0*EL82l-
•duio^
95 05 OL
89 tE t9
62 Z5 frE
62 Z5 Ll
95 LE l l
95 IZ l l
g-oo-i
2*61 E'Ztl 9*99E
Z*02 5*501 t*ELt2
2*El 2*801 8*ZEt2
8*11 Z'LL 0"ZL92
rLi 9*5t 0*9E5E
6*L2 5*2El 0*L69ll
•SU9_L
^(LLS) ssaj t j s [euuofj uoLq.oaj|.p-;,
ss?L9 uinuiuin[^
SSPL9
ssBLS uinu).iun[v
SSPL9 uinuLiun[y
SSBL5
SSP19 iunu).uin[y
lB|.ja:jBK
s ^ P J ^ D
s^t^^^S J. . .
^8i6u«Mi
gpiozad6jj[
2„pj«pire^S,.
(uin^vp) ajvnb^
i(^"dui AI oMVuao^)
adaqs 0). j^Mtoac)
S3ianis Diyi3wo39 yod S3SS3yis iS39yv"i JO Ayvwwns
e 3navi
75
TABLE 3—-Continued
STRESS TYPE
Pos.
566.1 113.3 26.2
377.3 113.4 18.4
627.8 96.6 14.1
532.5 124.2 18.5
110.7 76.0 21.2
143.5 231.5
6.8
Shear Stress (S12)7
Loc.3
45 14 51
45 14 17
55 58 56
55 14 12
66 22 68
18 14 56
Neg.
-705.9 -121.5
-1313.3 -112.3
-527.3 -122.3
-1233.3 -100.6
-0.9
-101.6 -44.9
0.9
-169.4 -216.0
Loc.3
11 23
27 57
26 57
27 57 56
n 23 63
10 57
Maximum Principal Stress (SMAX)7
Tens.
13469.0 917.7 42.7
3536.8 763.6 30.7
2713.9 760.8 17.6
2903.0 705.3
17.8
2765.4 661.6 37.0
1 476.2 721.8 22.4
Loc.8
36 1
56
11 1
56
n 1
56
34 1
29
65 1
68
10 1
56
Comp.
-2979.6 -51.3 -32.3
-1113.4 -16.3 -18.6
-731.1 -28.3 -5.2
-1083.0 -37.7 -2.8
-648.0 -63.2 -15.9
-196.7 -35.3 -15.3
Loc.'
54 21 12
27 22 12
26 22 12
32 15 43
17 72 12
54 15 12
Mil
Tens.
3441.6 32.1 0.7
876.2 15.4 5.7
751.2 23.9 2.2
1178.2 59.5 1.5
701.3 10.2 0.9
104.9 55.3
5.0
nimum Stress
Loc.9
36 30 28
11 50 25
11 47 25
34 58 25
65 57 37
10 31 56
Principal (SMIN)'
Comp.
-12316.0 -900.5
-75.0
-4302.7 -966.3
-63.8
-3204.4 -943.3
-41.9
-2849.1 -901.4 -32.7
-2546.0 -834.6
-64.2
-598.1 -378.6 -41.4
locJ
55 2
i2
27 2
12
55 2
12
27 2
12
15 2
12
54 2
12
" See Figure 9 for orientation and positive directions of stresses within element.
^Stress locations: For "standard" see Figure 26. For trapezoid see Figure ^4. For triangle see Figure 23. For "T" shape see Figure 25. For circle see Figure 22.
76
ii.i
'S9LJBA l^^d9p :|.UeLB9S 9[Ll^M ^ UB^ SUOO SULeUJ9wl S U 0 L : ^ B D 0 [ ^ U 9 U J 9 [ 9 9AL^B[9y 'SUOLq-POOL :).U911J9[9 JOJ. g 9 J n 5 L j 0 ^ J 9 j . 9 y c
•:).U9lil9[9 ULLj ^LM
S9ss9ji^s ^0 suoLq.D9j.Lp 9AL:;Lsod puB uoL^c:^u9LJo Jo^ 6 9-«n6Lj 999
•9:^BLd S S B L B -i9q.no gq^ o: p9L[ddB j.sd 93 j.o 9jnss9Jd puLM 6UL:^DB
pJBMq.no "JeOZ ^'5 p9ULB:^ULBUJ SL 9jn:;BJ9dUJ9:^ J0LJ9:^UL 9LLL|M j p O f r -oq. S9SB9J39P 9jn:^BJ9dm9q. j o L j 9 q . x 3 •tn.un 9LJ:^ O:; j0LJ9q.x9 9SB9JD9p
9 j n s s 9 j d DLjq.9UJ0JBq Lsd £ SuLsnBO [ 9 A 9 [ B9S oq. p9q. jodsuBj:^ '^\-^0
•JoOZ SJ- 9jn:^BJ9diu9:^ U9I^M "191 9AoqB •q.j. 0009 ^ ^ p9[B9s puB p9LqiiJ9ssB :^LUn SUOL^LpUOQ [ B:^U91UU0 J L AU3 y\I 0LJBU9D9 :^ndUL / \ I 0 I . J B U 9 D 9 0 ^ p9 : ^D9PqnS 9 J 9 M S[9p0UJ q ^ d 9 p q.UB[B9S [ [ B *Uin^Bp 9 q ^ Lj^LM s v ^
21 2
21 2
21 2
ts 2 1 2
2 1 2 ^5
£-00-1
6*8E-2*50Ll-0*91621-
L'LZ-O'LZOL-0*80lEl-
Z'SE-Z'BfrOl-0*Z9LEL-
Z'ZZ-Z*Z68-0*Z8Z2l-
9*EE-9*Efr0l-0*860El-
•dlUOQ
95 59 9E
95 I 9E
95 I 9E
95 I 9E
95 I 9E
£*301
9 * 5
retB 0*Zt6Ll
f 8 Z*66Z 0*lfrL2l
O'Ol l'28Z 0 '9Lm
8*01 8*916 O'OEITEL
Z'Zi 5*08Z 0*0t6El
•suaj^
z(22S) ss*J^S isuuo^ uo;.^oaj|.p-2
21 91 55
21 El 55
21 EL 55
21 El 55
21 12 55
j-oo-i
3 d U SSiUiS
8*98-0*89-0*fr9E2t-
2**8-2*t'9-0*6E92l-
Z*6Z-9*69-0*L90El-
f frZ-Z'ZL-0*E1821-
C*5Z-6*9Z-0*SL2El-
•duioo J
95 Z Ll
95 OE l l
95 OE LL
95 LE Ll
95 IE l l
•00-]
E*OL t*Sf 0*L*2Ll
t*9l E*8t O'OLtLl
0*02 2*GZ 0*21611
6*L2 S*2El 0*L69Ll
0*52 5*5L2 0*19021
•suaj^
ed lS) ssaj^s [BuuoN uoj.^Daj|.p-x
^up[pas ssPLS
uinu(.uin[y
^UBi»as ss^LS
unu(.iDni y
:>up[aes
umu ttin y
^usi»as ss»L9
iunu^un[v
t^uBlBas SSBL9
iunu).iun[^
l«Lja^«W
..2/L
..8/E
nt/ l
(nm^ap) ..8/1
..9L/1
M daQ ^uc[ea^
S3ianis Hid3a I N V I V 3 S yod S3SS3yis is39yvi dO Ayvwwns
t 318V1
TABLE 4—Continued
77
STRESS TYPE
Pos.
590.7 138.5 28.2
566.1 113.3 26.2
564.3 118,0 26.8
566.5 122.4 62.7
529.9 129.4 25.7
Shear Stress (SI 2)2
Loc.3
45 31 46
45 14 51
45 14 46
45 14 20
52 14 51
Neg.
-718.4 -109.2
-0.3
-705.9 -121.5
-743.2 -123.9
-754.2 -122.1
-762.7 -129.6
Loc.3
11 23 35
11 23
11 23
11 23
11 57
Maximum Stress
Tens.
13981.0 781.2 46.8
13469.0 917.76 42.7
13456.0 783.0 34.2
12171.0 800.7 38.9
11980.0 850.6 32.9
Loc.3
36 1
56
36 1
56
36 1
56
36 1 56
36 65 56
Principal (SMAX)2
Comp.
-3036.3 -73.3 -33.0
-2979.6 -51.3 -32.8
-3098.1 -54.2 -25.2
-3154.6 -60.7 -37,3
-3146.0 -67.8 -19.7
Loc.3
55 21 56
54 21 12
54 16 12
54 16 12
54 16 17
M1
Tens.
3596.6 35.4 1.2
3441.6 32.1 0.7
3379.9 37.3
3087.5 31.2
3047.8 27.8
nimura Principal Stress (SMIN)2
Loc.^
36 47 28
36 30 28
36 30
11 30
n 50
Comp.
-13216.0 -1046.6
-75.6
-12816.0 -908.6 -75.0
-13130.0 -1051.7
-80.3
-13124.0 -1074,4
-84.6
-12933.0 -1109.0
-t7.0
Loc.^
55 2 12
55 2 12
54 2 12
54 2 12
54 2 17
78
The local model is also effective in examining stresses in spacer
and sealant when the aspect ratio (ratio of height to width) of the
spacer is reduced in 1/8 in. increments and each position is examined
using the local model and the Scenario IV inputs. The final spacer
shape is a flat strip of aluminum 0.044' inches in height and 1/2 in.,
wide. A width of 1/2 in. is maintained while height is varied (Ref.
Figs. 27-31). Comparisons of spacer and sealant stresses under these
changes are given in Table 5. These results are also discussed in
Chapter VIII.
Corner Effects Model
A single corner effects model evaluation examined spacer sealant
stresses for modified Scenario IV conditions. Corner effects were ex
amined on a local cross-section sufficiently close to the vertical
edge of the unit that glass plate displacements and rotations could be
neglected. For Scenario IV, dimensional changes caused by thermal ef
fects are the primary distorting influences at the corner. In addi
tion to the elimination of plate rotations, modifications to the local
model include an added vertical restraint to the spacer. This
additional restraint simulates the restraining effects of the vertical
portion of the spacer on horizontal spacer cross-section motions.
Also considered is the difference in thermal expansion between the
outer glass plate, inner glass plate* and vertical portion of the
spacer due to the difference in coefficients of thermal expansion
between aluminum and glass. In Scenario IV the spacer contracts a
larger distance than the outer glass plate, causing a larger extension
79
38 37 28 29
FIGURE 27. ASPECT RATIO TEST SQUARE (DATUM) SPACER
80
36 35
FIGURE 28. ASPECT RATIO TEST 3/8 IN. BY 1/2 IN. SPACER
81
FIGURE 29. ASPECT RATIO TEST 1/4 IN. BY 1/2 IN. SPACER
82
32 31
FIGURE 30. ASPECT RATIO TEST 1/8 IN. BY 1/2 IN. SPACER
83
30 28
FIGURE 31. ASPECT RATIO TEST, THIN STRIP BY 1/2 IN. SPACER
84
'l£ ejn6Lj aes ,,2/L X d.Lj S -'OJ 'Oe 9Jn6LJ 99S „2/LX„8/L - Oj •62 ajnS.Lj eas „2/LX,.^/L JOJ
•82 ajn6Lj aas „2/Lx..8/e - oj V 2 9Jn6Lj aas .,2/Lx.,2/L -»0j
:SUOL:;BDO-|
•^uaiua^a uLqq.LM sassaj:^s ^o suoLt^oauLp aALC^Lsod pue uoup^ua.LJo JOj. 6 sjnS.Lj aa^ ^
•a: i?[d sse[6 jat^no aq^ o: paL[ddB j.sd 92 j.o a-inssajd puLM 6uLq.DP pjBMi no "JoOZ ^^ pauLeq-ULBiu SL ajnt^Bjaduja:^ j0Lja:^uL aL.LLjM j^^ofr-o: saseauoap ajn:^Bjadiua:^ JOLWIS^^B '^Lun aq^ o: jOLjat^xa aseajoap ajnssajd OLji^aujojeq Lsd £ BuLsnco [aAa^ eas ULBUJ O: paq.wiodsuBjq. ^LUp 'JoO^ SL ajnt^Bjaduja:^ uaqM ig^j aAoqe -q.^ 0009 "^^ pateas puc pa[qujassB ^LUf]—suotq-LpuoQ L^^U9"J"o-»!-AU3 /yj OLueuaos ri^nduL / \ i OLjeuaos o: pa^oapqns ajaM s^apouj OLC^BJ : oadse jaoeds [ [ B »ujn: Bp aq:; q LM sy ^
Zl 2 Z2
ZL 6E 2
91 2 ZZ
t l 2 62
21 2 ^5
.-OCT
6*9-l*6EB-0*1-
6*9-9*E0E-0*8^8-
9*61-l 'ZlfL-E*2EZl-
8*SE-9*EE6-5 * 5 0 2 ^
Z'ZZ" Z*Z68-0*Z8Z2l-
•diuo^ J
62 L L2
LZ I 61
I ZZ
LZ I
95 I 9E
•00-)
Z*5 6*969 E*l
Z't 5*00Z L*WE
5*21 Z*E5B 0*V69L
O'frL 5*5EZ t*ZE8E
8*01 8*916 C'OEKl
•suaj^
2(225) ssaj^s leuuofj uo(.^odj|.p-2
Zl ZZ L2
Zl SE ZZ
91 6 ZZ
81 12
21 El 55
g-oo-i
3dJU. SS3dIS
E*9l-8*89-t*2l-
t*9l-8*05-S'LOL-
L'n-Z'iZL-
6'ZS-8*E0l-9*229E-
5*tZ-E*2Z-0*EL82l
62 91 LZ
52 6 OE
n LZ
ZZ 5t ZV
95 LE
- L l
2 * L L t*E9 8*5
2*EL 2*221 6*16
8*52 t*EZ E*666
1*62 t* l6 6*900t
6*L2 5*2El 0*L69Ll
z d L S ) ssaa:^s [auuofj uo(.^oaj),p-;^
^uBiaas SSPL9
iimu|.iun[
^ucisaj
^u»lBas SSPL9
^UBipas ss»LS
uinuj.iun[y
^uc[aa3 ssBLD
uinu|.uin[y
[KHa^sW
..2/L y
..2/IX..8/1
„Z/l^u1f/i
,.2/l^„8/E
(uin^cp) . .2/l^.2/l
32 s ja39d£
S3ianis oiivy lOBdSv asDVds yod s3SS3yis isaoyvi do Ayvwwns
9 3"iavi
TABLE S—Continued
85
STRESS TYPE
Pos.
566.1 113.3 26.2
285.3 143.3 15.0
362.4 131.8 11.1
88.2 241.7
5.7
3.1 232.4
2.5
Shear Stress (S12)2
Loc.^
45 14 51
20 9
27
43 18 25
38 7
25
25 8
18
Neg.
-705.9 -121.5
-292.0 -133.9
-139.5 -133.1
-38.5 -80.8
-51.5 -0.3 -1.2
Loc.^
11 23
42 54
40 45
23 42
36 21 17
Maximum Principal Stress (SMAX)'2
Tens.
13469.0 917.7 42.7
4034.8 737.4 38.4
1695.2 845.8 29.9
306.3 701.1 16.1
5.0 697.5
11.2
Loc. Cotnp.
36 -2979.6 1 -51.3
56 -32.8
42 -900.7 1 -37.4
49 -2.4
32 -401.9 1 -31.3
44 -2.7
19 -97.1 1 -16.2
25 -6.6
22 — 1 -11.7
29 -6.7
Loc.
54 21 12
29 47 41
23 10 34
23 46 17
2 17
'11
Tens.
3441.6 32.1 0.7
950.3 19.1 5.0
359.3 51.8 7.6
88.0 19.9 3.2
24.4 5.7
nimum Stress
Loc.^
36 30 28
42 45 22
32 49 44
30 16 37
16 29
Principal ; (SMIN)2
Comp.
-12816.0 -900.6
-75 .0
-4209.2 -934.3
-63.3
-1734.6 -742.9 -46.5
-306.8 -848.9 -16.7
-12.4 -840.0 -16.4
Loc.
55 2
12
29 2
14
23 2 3
39 7
17
21 2
17
86
in the connecting sealant. The spacer and outer glass plate were not
assumed to be at the same temperature. A one dimensional, steady
state, heat flow analysis gave the average temperature of the outer
glass plate at -67.35**F, while the spacer was warmer at +15'*F. Even
with this temperature difference the aluminum spacer contracted a
larger amount than the outer glass plate. For example, in Scenario IV
the outer glass plate decreased in height 0.0296 in. from the resting
block to the top of the IG unit while the vertical portion of the
spacer decreased in height 0.0483 in. Unlike the outer glass plate,
the spacer is assumed to contract half the total distance from top and
bottom. A comparison was made between the corner effects model and
the center line Scenario IV to determine if the presence of the
vertical spacer caused stresses in the IG unit components to be
appreciably different from those obtained from the centerline local
model. Largest stresses for the IG unit components, in the corner
effects model, are compared to the local model Scenario IV, as shown
in Table 6. The information in this table is discussed in Chapter
VIII.
87
L.
'l_l ajn5Lj aas—SUOL:^BDOL ssaj^^g^
•:^uauja[a uiq LM sassawiq.s j.o suoL:).Daj ip aALq.Lsod puc uoLq.eq.uaLjo joj . 5 ajnS.Lj aag-
•^[uo paL^ddB /\i OLJBuaos luojj. saBueqo aunq-Bjaduiaj ^
•a^PLd sse[6 jat^no aq^ o: paLLddp j.sd g2 J.0 ajnssajd puLM 5UL^DP pwiBMq.nQ "JoOZ '^^ pauLPq.uLBiii SL ajn^^Bjadmaq. j0Ljaq.UL a[LqM jpO^" ^^ sascauoap ajnq.Bjadiuaq. joLjaq.x3 •q.Lun aq^ o: joLjaq.xa ascauoap ajnssa-id DLj:).aujojpq Lsd £ 6uLsnB0 [aAa^ cas ULBUI o:; pa:;jodsupj^ %\.u[\ '^^OL !- 9-»n:^Bjadiijaq. uaqM -]$ j aAoqp ' ^ j . 0009 ^B pa[Bas puB paLqiuassB t^Lup—suoLc^tpuoQ LB^uaujuojLAU3 ^j OLjeuaDg,
21 59 t5
21 2 t5
t,'=*°1
t 'E l -E*25Z-l*LE29-
Z'ZZ-L'LSd-O'LBLZi-
•dlUOQ
95 99 OL
95 I 9E
^•00-]
rti 2*209 0*0068
8*01 8*916 O'OEfrEl
•SUB^
£(22S) ssaj^s [BUUOf uo.L^DaJ^p-2
21 EL 55
21 El 55
^•Do-i
3dAi ssaais
f O E -5'OOt-9"9L5^
5*tZ-E'2Z-0*EL82l-
•diuoo ^
95 LE l l
9 5 LE Ll
•DOI
t*62 6*921 0*5E95L
6*12 5*2El 0'L69ll
•sua_L
E ( I L S ) ssaj^s [Buuoi uo;.^3aj|.p-;^
SSPL9 uinu;.iun[y
tvuBiaas SSBL9
uinu|.uin[y
l»l.je^BK
ziapoK s^3©ii3 jaiuo^
lAI o^jBuao^
lapoK
i3aow S1D33J3 y3Naoo yoj S3SS3yis iS39yvi 30 Ayvwwns
9 3"igvi
88
TABLE 6—Continued
STRESS TYPE
Pos.
566.1 113.3 26.2
1147.4 477.9
7.4
Shear Stress (S12)3
Loc."*
45 14 51
27 31 25
Neg.
-705.9 -121.5
-857.6 -142.3 -14.3
Loc.**
11 23
11 23 43
Maximum Stress
Tens.
13469.0 917.2 42.7
15714.0 604.3 37.8
Loc."
36 1
56
11 66 56
Principal (SMAX)3
Comp.
-2979.6 -51.3 -32.8
-1334.4 -47.4 -12.0
Loc.**
54 21 12
54 21 12
M1
Tens.
3441.6 32.3 0.7
6300.2 15.3 5.9
nimum Principal Stress (SMIN)3
Loc."*
36 30 28
11 30 56
Comp.
-]2816.0 -900.6 -75.0
-6318.7 -752.5 -31.4
Loc.-
55 2 12
54 65 12
CHAPTER VIII
DISCUSSION OF BEHAVIOR PREDICTED BY MODELS
Parametric Evaluations
Data generated using the local model are analyzed to determine if
any of the sealant-spacer combinations has an adverse effect on the
magnitude of stresses at the boundary of the unit. Data are examined
to evaluate the effects of having the spacer split or welded, and to
establish extreme conditions. Data generated from geometric studies
are examined to establish effects of changing the shape of the spacer
cross-section. Sealant depth and spacer height changes are also
evaluated. Finally, results of an evaluation using the corner model
run are compared to a Scenario IV centerline local model to determine
if the stiffening effect of the vertical portion of the spacer at the
corner significantly increases the IG unit component stresses at a
corner. Scenario IV is the local model input used on all parametric
studies except the corner model.
Split and Welded Spacers
Selection of datum input conditions to the local model is
accomplished using the Scenarios of Chapter VII. Two spacer types are
used in this analysis to determine the reasonably expected extreme
conditions. These spacers are referred to as split and welded.
Additionally the welded spacers are referred to as solid in the tables
of ordered stresses in Appendix 3. Both are cold formed and have
89
90
essentially the same geometry. The preferred type of spacer is
difficult to determine from the data generated from the several
Scenarios. Examination of the data in Tables 1 and 2 shows that, for
Scenario I, solid spacer stresses are generally larger than stresses
in the split spacer. Scenario II data "indicate stresses in the split
and solid spacers that make it difficult to state that stresses in one
of the spacers are generally larger or smaller. If sealant stresses
are considered, they are larger for the solid spacer in both Scenario
I and Scenario II. Based on this observation the split spacer would
seem to carry a small advantage.
Scenarios III and IV address conditions which involve the solid
spacer only. Conditions in Scenarios III and IV cause deflections of
the glass plates toward each other, producing compression of the
spacer in the central region of each side of the IG unit. Subsequent
element crossing at the seam in the finite element solution of the
local model in Scenarios III and IV do not give results that are
considered reliable. Hence, split spacer evaluations using Scenarios
III and IV were eliminated from the evaluation.
Geometric Studies
Stress changes in the local model are examined for varying
geometric spacer cross-sections. Cross-sections used are described in
Chapter VII (Ref. Figs. 22-26 and Table 3). The datum cross-section
is the square spacer and Scenario IV input (reasonably expected
extreme condition) is used on all geometric studies. In general, all
spacer cross-sections produced relatively large stress reductions in
91
the spacer material relative to the square spacer. With the exception
of the S22 (Ref. Table 3) sealant stress in the detail with the
standard spacer, all sealant stresses are reduced slightly. The
square spacer is the least efficient cross-section in terms of spacer
and sealant stresses (Ref. Table 7).
Effect of Sealant Depth
Results of evaluations with different sealant depths are given in
Table 4. Starting with a datum depth of 1/8 in. the maximum tensile
stresses in the sealant and spacer materials decrease slightly with
increasing sealant depth. The largest compressive stresses in the
spacer material tend to remain constant while increasing in the
sealant material. This trend continues until sealant stresses
decrease at a sealant depth of 1/2 in. The largest tensile and
compressive glass stresses increase with increasing sealant depth,
indicating that more of the secondary stresses on the boundary of the
seal detail are carried by the glass as sealant depth increases. As
can be seen from the plots of maximum material stress (Ref. Fig. 32),
stresses in the materials remain constant with increased sealant depth
for practical purposes. Depth of sealant has little effect on
secondary material stresses at the boundary of an IG unit.
Effect of Spacer Aspect Ratio
Examination of the effect of spacer aspect ratio was accomplished
by keeping the width of the square spacer constant while decreasing
the height in 1/8 in. increments. Four runs were made with the
local model using Scenario IV input conditions. Largest tensile and
TABLE 7
CHANGE IN MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL STRESS DUE TO SPACER GEOMETRY CHANGE
92
Geometric Shape
Square (datum)
"Standard"
Trapezoid
Triangle
"T" Shaped
Circle
Material
Aluminum Glass Sealant
Aluminum Glass Sealant
Aluminum Glass Sealant
Aluminum Glass Sealant
Aluminum Glass Sealant
Aluminum Glass Sealant
Datum Maximum Principal Stress
Tens.
13447.0 777.8 42.7
13447.0 777.8 42.7
13447.0 777.3 42.7
13447.0 777.8 42.7
13447.0 777.8 42.7
13447.0 777.8 42.7
Loc.
36 1
56
36 1
56
36 1
56
36 1 56
36 1
56
36 1
56
STRESS TYPE
Maximum Principal Stress w/Geometric
Change
Tans.
13447.0 771.8 42.7
3536.8 763.6 30.7
2713.9 760.8 17.5
2903.0 705.3 17.8
2765.4 661.6 37.0
476.2 721.3 22.4
Loc.
36 1
56
11 1 56
11 1
56
34 1
29
65 1
68
10 1
56
Percent Decrease
—
73.3 1.3
28.1
79.3 2.2 58.3
78.4 9.3 58.3
79.4 14,9 13.3
95.5 7.2
47.5
93
uoTsuaji uoTssejduioo
CO CO
CO CO <D
CO
CO CO 0 w ^« CO • *
c CO • • M
CO o CO
^ ^ i «
a ® TD ^^ c CO CO <D
CO
ii -o
o o CO
a CO
ISd/ssajq-g
(speapuriH) ISd/ss3j:;s
/. • • .
>:• C-: I.-.
in ID
^spuBsnoiii) i s d / s s 3 j : ; s
t3
a. LU a
to h- LU Z 00 < 00 -J LU <: a: LU I— oo oo
o o LU a. LL. S LL. O LU <_>
CVJ OO
94
compressive stresses from Table 4 are plotted in Figure 33. The
largest tensile and compressive stresses decrease in all three
materials as spacer height decreases from the square configuration.
Spacer and sealant stresses decrease rapidly as the spacer becomes
thinner while glass stresses remain essentially constant. Since part
of the spacer function is to hold desiccant, there is a limit to the
amount of reduction in spacer height that can be accepted. Generally,
as spacer height decreases secondary stresses in the spacer and
sealant materials, at the IG unit boundary, decrease.
Corner Effects Model
Results of analyses employing the corner effects model are
compared with results from using Scenario IV with the local model as
shown in Table 6. Except for an increase in spacer stress, the
effects of vertical spacer restraint are not as severe as may be
expected. The probable reason for this is the small force required to
elongate the spacer. This small force is due to the small cross-
sectional area (0.044 sq. in.) and comparatively long length (67 in,).
Elongation of the spacer occurs more readily than may be expected.
The corner effects model may be used further to examine how stresses
are affected by changes in spacer material and material thickness.
Examination of effects of changing sealant modulus upon IG unit
component stresses is accomplished by performing a local model
analysis using an upper and a lower bound for the sealant modulus.
These modulus values are found in Chapter VI. Moduli selected are 250
psi for the upper bound and 150 psi for the lower. These two values
95
uoTsuaj, uoTssajdmoo
CO CO
k. ^« CO CO CO
CO CO o ^
CO CO 0 k.
CO
CO CO CO ^^
^ M
J ? w
O CO a
CO
/
dTj:^S
ISd/ssajq-s
dTJ:^S
("spsjpunHT ISd/sse j :^s
dTj^S
o o
cn
Q. OO <a: 00
LU cn </i LU oo O LU <: Q: Q. ^— oo oo
o z
o o LU a .
Lu O LU O
ro CO
(spuesnoqi) ISd/ssej:^s
96
for sealant modulus were used with each of the six Scenarios in
Chapter VII. Results are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The effect on
IG unit stresses is that component stresses increased slightly
(approximately 10%) when the 250 psi sealant modulus was included in
the local model. Since sealant modulus'is dependent on strain rate,
these results indicate that IG unit component stresses may be higher
for short duration loads on the IG unit (e.g., a wind gust). Effects
of sealant modulus on maximum principal stresses for the IG unit
component materials, for the six Scenarios, are shown in Figure 34.
Potential Additional Model Applications
Motions of the boundary portion of an IG unit, as represented by
the local model, are controlled by motions of the two glass plates
which are the most massive amount of material in an IG unit.
Secondary stresses at the boundary are the controlling stresses for
the spacer and sealant materials in the IG unit. Based on these facts
the local model can be used to define an optimum spacer cross-section
that would minimize spacer and sealant stresses at the boundary. In
this same context an optimum (minimum) amount of spacer and sealant
material can be determined. As an example, by considering the outcome
of the geometric and spacer aspect ratio studies, a good starting
point for optimization might be a circular (elliptic) spacer cross-
section with a minimum practical height. Considerations of desiccant
amount and required sealant bonding area will determine practical
spacer diameters for given IG unit sizes. Use of output from the
97
Scenario
I - Split
II - Split
M l - Solid u ^ II - Solid
III - Solid
IV - Solid
Stress - PSI (Thousands) 4 6 8 10 '12 14
i I
I - Split
II - Split
S I - Solid
O II - Solid
III - Solid
IV - Solid
_Stress - PSI 30
I - Split
II - Split
5 I - Solid
< II - Solid cn
III - Solid
IV - Solid
FIGURE 34.
Sealant Modulus
150 PSI
250 PSI
EFFECT ON MAXIMUM PRINCIPAL 16 UNIT COMPONENT STRESSES DUE TO CHANGE IN SEALANT MODULUS
98
local model will reveal changes in secondary stresses as the spacer
cross-section is modified.
Local models also can be used to estimate the effect on secondary
stresses at the boundary due to changes in unit response caused by
installation method. Effects of mechanically restrained IG unit
systems may be included in the local model as spring forces at the
location of the gasket (Ref. Fig. 35). An assumed clamping force of
ten pounds per lineal inch (or other values obtained from a global
model of the same system) can be placed at the appropriate node as a
concentrated load and the gasket response can be modeled as a spring
at the same node. Effects of details using dry neoprene gaskets may
be represented by including the gasket in the finite element
discretization (Ref. Fig. 36).
Recent developments in glazing systems attach the IG units to the
building structure by a polymer (usually silicone). Secondary
boundary stresses of this type of installation also could be
determined by application of local model techniques (Ref. Fig. 37).
Conclusions
These newly developed local models do not have a base of prior
methods of analysis for use in making comparisons. However, local
model responses are compatible with intuitive expectations.
Generally, stresses are largest in the sealant and spacer materials
when caused by racking motions resulting from thermal expansion.
These stresses arise primarily from the attempt of the spacer to
rotate in order to compensate for the height differences between the
99
(0 o ^^ CO
^^•i 3 E • • I H
(0 ^ c CO
on
st
u
• ® 0) c o
resp
^^ O) ® c ^
^ CO
a CO CO a
n
O ^
«
n
m:^^i^!m^^;^^m^^msm:
^ M ^
-WH^
n A ^
CO to
«
5S^}SSS^SSSSSSSSSSSS^:SSSSSS?SSS3^ /
/ - 0 ^ Jo to •»
«
9 IO
4 CM
e
rvW4
r -CO-Ui
->w-^
^^SSJSSSSSSi^SiSSSS^SSSSS^^
Si^SSiSSSSSiSSJiS^S^^
oo
o
o LU
<: cn h-oo LU
cn >-
O
O
o
oo o CL
o a.
in CO
cn
100
DISCRETIZED GASKET^
MOUNTING FRAME
FIGURE 36. PROPOSED LOCAL MODEL FOR GASKET RESTRAINED IG UNITS
101
Seals included in discretization, mounting system assumed rigid.
MOUNTING SYSTEM
ATTACHMENT SEAL
FIGURE 3 7 . PROPOSED LOCAL MODEL FOR POLYMER MOUNTED IG UNITS
102
glass plates. Wind induced pressures can increase or decrease these
stresses, depending on the direction of rotation of the boundary
caused by the wind. Visual interpretations of the above effects can
be seen in the computer generated un-deformed and deformed cross-
sections of Figures 38-43. These cross-sections are provided by the
local model results.
Geometric studies indicate that spacer cross-section affects the
intensity of secondary stresses in the glass, sealant, and spacer. A
square spacer cross-section may be desirable from a fabrication
standpoint, but it is the most highly stressed component of all the
cross-sections examined. Sealant and spacer material stresses are
reduced in the "standard," "T," trapezoidal and triangular spacer
crossOsection due to increased amounts of sealant. Thin strips of
sealant between the vertical sides of the square spacer and the glass
plates do not provide sufficient volumes of material to permit large
displacements of the glass plates without causing large unit
displacements of the sealant sealant material, thus placing greater
forces on the spacer. The above mentioned spacer shapes have larger
amounts of low modulus sealant material surrounding them. More
sealant material makes smaller unit displacements for the same overall
displacements caused by the glass plates; hence, spacer and sealant
stresses are smaller. Additionally, the circular cross-section spacer
reduces stresses by rotating in response to the thermal expansion
induced racking motions (Ref. Fig. 44).
103
SCENARIO I Environmental ConditiorxS. IG unit is assembled and sealed at mean sea level(MSL) when temperature is 70**F. Unit is transported to 6000 ft above MSL causing a barometric pressure decrease of 3 psi exterior to the unit. Exterior temperature rises to 110 °F while interior temperature OS le st a TO^T by air conditioning. A 35 psf inward acting pressure is applied to the outer glass plate.
FTRllRF 38 UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL FIGURE 38. UN ^ ^ ^ jQ pQ SCEMARIO I SPLIT SPACER
104
SCENARIO II Environmental Conditions. IG unit is assembled and sealed at mean sea level (MSL) when temperature is 70°F. Unit is transported to 6000 ft above MSL causing a barometric pressure decrease of 3psi exterior to the unit. Exterior temperature rises to 110**? while interior temperat: is kept at 70*F by air conditioning. A 25 psf outward acting pressure is applied to the outer glass plate.
FIGURE 39. UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO II SPLIT SPACER
105
SCENARIO I Environmental Conditions. IG unit is assembled and sealed at mean sea level(MSL) when temperature is 70**F. Unit is transported to 6000 ft above MSL causing a barometric pressure decrease of 3 psi exterior to the unit. Exterior temperature rises to 110 "F while interior temperature OS le^st a 70*'F by air conditioning. A 35 psf inward acting pressure is applied to the outer glass plate.
1 • 1 — \ — 1 . I--
1
1
i 1
FIGURE 40. UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO III SPLIT SPACER
106
SCENARIO II Environmental Conditions. IG is assembled and when temperature to 6000 ft above decrease of 3psi
unit (MSL) sea level
is transported sealed at mean is 70''F. Unit MSL causing a barometric pressure exterior to the unit. Exterior
temperature rises to 110*F while interior temperature is kept at 70*'F by air conditioning. A 25 psf outward acting pressure is applied to the outer glass plate.
CrrjH
"^^^
FIGURE 41 UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO II WELDED SPACER
107 SCENARIO III Environmental Conditions IG Unit is assembled and sealed at 6 000 ft above MSL when temperature is 70*F. Unit is transported to sea
causing a 3psi barometric pressure increase to the unit. Exterior temperature drops
level exterior to -40°F while interior temperature is kept at 70''F by air conditioning. A 35 psf inward acting pressure is applied tc the outer"glass plate.
j
1
1
1
FIGURE 42. UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO III
108
SCENARIO IV Environmental Conditions. IG unit is assembled and sealed at 6000 ft above MSL when temperature is 70° F. Unit is transported to sea level causing a 3 psi barometric pressure increase exterior to the unit. Exterior temperature drops to -40** F while interior temperature is kept at 70° F by air conditioning. A 25 psf outward acting pressure is applied to the outer glass plate.
L=
•
k >•
r
»
FIGURE 43. UNDEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL CROSS-SECTION FOR SCENARIO IV
109
FIGURE 44. UN-DEFORMED AND DEFORMED LOCAL MODEL FOR CIRCULAR SPACER WITH SCENARIO IV ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
no
Reducing the spacer height while holding spacer width constant
also has the effect of reducing stresses in sealant and spacer
materials. Most spacer stresses are due to geometric distortion of
rectangular cross-sections. As the length of spacer adjacent to the
glass decreases, the force transmitted by the thin strip of sealant
also decreases, and spacer distortion decreases.
Sealant depth, according to the models, does not have significant
effects on spacer and sealant stresses. Tensile glass stresses
increase slightly at a sealant depth of 1/2 inch.
Corner model evaluations indicate that stress results are lower
than may have been expected. Spacer length and small cross-sectional
area allowed greater flexibility of restraint at the corner.
Recommendations for Future Efforts
Development of the local model is directed toward achieving
better understanding of the secondary forces at the boundary of an IG
unit. Since this is a new area of investigation, the accuracy of the
models needs to be confirmed by a program of testing.
Prior to the testing program, the spacer model of Chapter V needs
to be solved. Methods of solution and a proposed equation are also
presented in Chapter V. Once the spacer response model is developed,
it can be tested in the same program mentioned above.
Sealant response, as presented in this document, does not take
into account changes in sealant response due to temperature. These
changes can be included using the procedure presented by Smith (Smith,
1952). A fracture criterion that can predict adhesive or cohesive
Ill
failure in the sealants needs to be incorporated in the model. Using
the local model to examine glazing systems such as the clamped,
gasket, and polymer mounted systems to develop safe and efficient
glass curtain walls is strongly suggested. This model can handle
effectively the stresses involved in these systems that have been
elusive in past efforts.
When a testing program has proven the global and local models to
be accurate indicators of the structural mechanics response of IG
units, they can be used in forming a reliable design method for IG
units and their attachment systems.
LIST OF REFERENCES
Al -Tayy ib , A H . , 1980: " G e o m e t r i c a l l y N o n l i n e a r A n a l y s i s of Rectangular Glass Plates by the Finite Element Method," Inst i tute for Acr^#PB81-8439f ' "" ^ ^ "" Universi ty, Lubbock, Texas. May (NTIS
Andrews, R D . , 1952: "Correlation of'Dynamic and Static Measurements on Rubberlike Mater ials," Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Vol . 44, No. 4. pp. 707-715. ^
A r c h i t e c t u r a l Aluminum Manufacturers Associat ion, MIR-1973-1981: Industry S ta t is t ica l Review and Forecast.
Behr, R.A., Minor, J .E . , Linden, M.P. and Vallabhan, C.V.G. , 1985: Laminated Glass Units Under Uniform Lateral Pressure," ASCE Journal
of Structural Engineering. Vol. I l l , No. 5, Paper No. 197261
Birdsal l , G.W., Ed., 1965: The Aluminum Data Book. Reynolds Metals Co., Richmond, Virg in ia .
Chou, G.D. and Vallabhan, C.V.G., 1985: "The Behavior of Insulating Glass Units Under Latera l Pressure," Glass Research and T e s t i n g L a b o r a t o r y , Texas Tech U n i v e r s i t y , Lubbock, Texas ( repor t in preparation).
Ferry, J .D . , 1980: Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. 3rd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, Inc . , New York.
Ketter, R.L. and Prawel, S.P., 1969: Modern Methods of Engineering Computation, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
Linden, M.P. , Minor, J . E . , Behr, R.A. and Vallabhan, C.V.G., 1984: "Evaluation of Lateral ly Loaded Laminated Glass Units by Theory and E x p e r i m e n t , " Glass Research and Test ing Laboratory, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas (NTIS Ace. #PB84-216423).
Moore, D.M., 1980: "Proposed Method for Determin ing the Glass Thickness of Rectangular Glass Solar Panels Subjected to Uniform Normal Pressure Loads," JPL P u b l i c a t i o n 8 0 - 3 4 , Je t P r o p u l s i o n Laboratory, Pasadena, Cal i fornia, October.
N ie lsen , L .E . , 1962: Mechanical Propert ies of Polymers, 1st Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.
Shand, E.B. and McLellan, G.W., 1984: Glass Engineering Handbook, 3rd Ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, New York.
112
113
Smith, T .L . , 1956: "Viscoelastic Behavior of Polysiobutylene Under Constant Rates of E longat ion ," Journal of Polymer Science. Vol. 20, No. 94.
Solvason, K.R., 1974: "Pressures and Stresses in Sealed Double G l a z i n g U n i t s , " T e c h n i c a l Paper No. 423, Div is ion of Bui lding Research, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, August.
Timoshenko, S. and Woinowsky-Krieger, $ . , 1959: Theory of Plates and Shells, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, New York.
Tobolsky, A.V. , 1960: Properties and Structure of Polymers. 1st Ed.. John Wiley and Sons, Inc . , New York, New York.
Treloar, L.R.G., 1958: The Physics of Rubber E l a s t i c i t y . 2nd Ed. , Clarendon Press, Oxford.
U.S. Bureau of the Census, 1982: Stat is t ica l Abstract of the United States (1982-83, 103rd Ed.) Washington, D.C.
Val labhan, C.V.G. and Ku, F-Y, 1983: " N o n l i n e a r A n a l y s i s of Rectangular Glass Plates by Galerkin Method," Inst i tute for Disaster Research, Texas Tech University Lubbock, Texas.
Vallabhan, C.V.G. and Minor, J . E . , 1984: "Experimental ly V e r i f i e d Theore t ica l Analysis of Thin Glass Plates," Preprints, Conference on Computational Methods and Experimental Methods (June 27-July 2, 1984, on board the Queen E l i z a b e t h I I ) , I n t e r n a t i o n a l Soc ie ty for Computational Methods in Engineering, Southampton, England.
Vallabhan, C.V.G. and Wang, B. Y - T . . 1981: "Nonlinear Analysis of Rectangular Glass Plates by Finite Difference Method," Inst i tute for Disaster Research, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, June (NTIS Ace. #PB82-172552).
Wi l l i ams, M . I . , Landel, R.F. and Ferry , J . D . , 1955: "Temperature Dependence of Relaxation Mechanisms in Amorphous Polymers and Other Glass Forming Liquids," Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol. 77, No. 14.
APPENDIX A
LISTING OF SEALANT STRESS-STRAIN PROGRAM
114
115
<r
ID O Ci
2 :
2: <I
: ^ ^ —i —^
:— ~- — 3 — ^ 2:' 3 :i « X
<r w x: -
•c ^ i : i : 2 : L_ Li
- — ^ •_•• ^ < : ; -^ ^ ^ ^ ^ - « * < • . * % • : . ^
2: 3
^ 1:1 Zi i^ "21 J- 'j^Z.'!^ IZCiL; ' IZ iii 21 - J ' . - < - - • . - ^ -^ -^ -y • - , — < , ^ - ' T ' • -
^ r j x ^ i n o rsaDr> --> .~v - ^ . - - ^ -^S.
r j ^ j r\i r--j ^\ r-i ^ j "^ ••« ^ " - :. M r - 4 r •<! ;:••< i: •< ^ >• "^ .;~ 'C .-• — r . - " ' - ^ . •
t >^"^ - « ^
116
Ci <:
<z ij. :D
r ^ <i c
I> ,::. X
Q: <r 2: 2:
2: >- LLi <: 2:
<I !- 3 >s
_ C
2: ~ c
C 3 2 _= >- c
-2:pz:p:::Lij2:2:2:z:3Lj_j2:3^ 2:pzp2ip2:z::i:2:2: 2:2:2:— = •~^ -- T ^ '- "2' < T :'.-' :"< :'r ;'r "T^ ^"7" '• • 'r^ "^ f^. •"< ^»" "- T*' •"--• "^ '** " ^ .'- -'- ."- -"< '< ;*< ' ^ ^
O |\ r3 > O —; <?- -JT T <7 U ii
- ^ '-s /«^
; n '-« •••
l i ^ " ^ 1 ' ^ -^ "J -r <r ^ >< -: cs t; ^ \ >v N ::::
117
<i
<: X
5 >-
3 <C ^
<r — n <r Lii
2 : H-.
•z. .— cn UJ <I i -
il^ ^ iXi ;.u 2 !
O X
<:
«:: rs: r^: rS: rS: .-^t
2 : 2 : 3 2 : 2 : 2 : 2 : 2 : 2 : 2 : 2 : 2 2 : 2 : 2 : 3 2 : 2 : 2 — - ^ - ^ - H
>: - r-t <i
—i X —
d ^ « c . <«< - s . • « . r ^ . ^ - ^ . ^
• *
— •
" — •
rb:
• V
% • <
. ?S .N-;
- ^ t
22 • - '
~ •
i —
-^
^^ ^ ".' .>
^, ^ 1 * ^ 1
— s
«« — I
•
- 5 :
» •
• ^ ^
— '•—'
'•^ s '<
a.
^ ?<-:
f O l
i J j
;— c
««
: ^ i
X,-^ < >>
i \ »<-: '—' <r
». 2 • •
»rt » o
—'
;21 • ^ " *
>—
•- — • •
N^ • « ^
• — '
^•: •'O "^ f^ fT\ <' ^ - . n^ ' S M ^ • ^ •
K^ ^_^ ^ ~ ' ^ ' < - N ^•^ ^ "Tr 'Vw - ^ v _ _ ^
Ti '•<-: ^ 2^ •<i>^
'> 0 'y- ^ y- '>
118
<z -— H
! - X
o x 2 X
— <i =
O X X
^ X
^V: _ J _ X^ Si . ^ . - •• ' ^ r^ r
^ ^ > s r-i X i - i "^ ^^ '^"^ fT\ ^^ fn ^m* -^^ ^ -^^ '"^ •^*
n X
3 2 .*0
2
>C 2 3
X ^ X
rs. s
;—
1 - *
• — •
:r:
^
.> X
2
—*• •^ "^ —y -^ fr\ •^ - f •^ -rr ' ^ K ^ II « ^ B ^ S B ^ ^ V H ^ ^ ^ 'TaB * <
X - i _^
• 7 ' :". ^ ^
^ 2 : : :
2; r ;^ 3; — 2J ,-\
3 ^ - 2 3 : ^ 2 2 — — - _ X - Q . 2 - ^ Q : ^ X - 7 - • : • " - ' 2 : ^ - ' : ' - ' —^ . ' - ' : • —•
0 0 0 0 0 0 *o <?" jj"; -"O ! \ O:D >- o - r-4 !- T L": >c " c: :N
*»< > 0 "^^ *<^ *< : ***• V ^ »•*-. < N < S <
•<r <r
119
•- o
<: <L
X
^ ci ^ in LL. •• CD r-i
2 0 i -• • r^ 3 • • 3
2 2 ^ ^ : ,: -" "^
2 -=i 2 «
«?• — T <r
<Z >-' T- •?- * ii ^ !i <Z ^ Ci —' li _J i - ! W ^ ^ ifi i— i— X X ?— 3 ^ ! — *-i ii ii ii :-^ ii —( ^ T i ii
i j J 2 i Z i 3 L L ! 3 > - ^ — _ J _ J ^ i — . . B . - ^ - - - , 2 : 3 i 7 ^ 2 2 : 2 u _ ! : i : ; l . X - j : i - ^ X i J I i ^ X T - . : : ^ : - . ^ — Ii i jJ ^ Ci r—i r-i i—! 2 0^ 3 2 ijJ 3 ""^ UJ Li_ !.:_ 3 - ^ L_J 3 ^^ '"-' • ~' f"* i : C : _ ^ - i i = i L _ - . U . L ^ - r 2 u . C J ^ Z r^-—- ! ^ C r - 2 3 ^ X X > - - ^
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ll 0 0 0 r i ^ > 0 O O O O O O O O O O O
o ^ r-j r« "c- iji sG »c i \ 3 cs cs C"- cs o -- r-i r; T iii v: -s 3 ^- o
120
• X
2 i i i—i — •/'
•rt X T rH -rt -2;
; ; ^ Ii X ^ X ^ ^ ^ X X C ^ ^
3 iZ 3 2 3 2 uI iH <i: 2 2 iX uI y ^ *-v .^x ^^ " ^ ^ - ^ -^^ ^ x "X f ^ . /^ -<—s •S_-' ^^ - • • . • ^ ^ '-—' -"-X s . ' - ^ .^ ' ^ i ' K^ ' * • •«•/• ' - . ^
•^ ^ i"N "^ rv x r- TN fs. ^ r . -N, 3
'T~ *• *— "^ ^ ^ 2 -^ -^ ^ ' ^
\ ^- -" r-^ ^ X X i^ r-! |j^
3 3 2 2 ir 3 iZ L i •-• ^ X > :
r,'i .-'; -v^ c- o —• "y
^ r i 3 »• — X X Ui < i : i i : ^ 3 X a i ^ 3
Li_ i: 3 r-i ^ uJ 2 2 _
T .-, -0 >^ -3 CS -O O O -
X
2 C 2 C 2 C
<r Ii u l ii i: <-» -i - ^
2 _^
— X
X >: iz
T-* T-- — X ii ^
v - w v x i : : ^ ! ! ::i i i x - ^ x x
^ X r - 3 ^ X ^ 3 - ^ X i - ^ 3 ^ X - ^ - ; - ^ X - ^ - i 2 u . L ^ X 2 2 ^ ^ < : U . C 2 < I 2 2 _
r^ "T; -^ i ^ >0 i > GD > O ^ •~i ! ^ ^ i i l vc i \ 3 0^ O ^ r-i . , m r; ro r* r* '^ ?o ^ ^ ^ <r <r T ^ 'T ^r T iii L1 Ji
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O <r J i <; r-x 3 CN o -^ r-i r : ^ i^i <; ^ u l i i l i j l -1 iT! i i l <; ^ ' ^ ^ ^ <; >C >C
121
X
< • r—
— X
X — X
X ^
^ >:
X -
X = - >c i-! X
X o
^ >i
X o
^ X
X o
>^ -r-
X —: :-; X r-! ^ ^ 2 X— —
« k * ^C ^ " M ^
3 ""C ''*• £ Si Gu ~ ^i 2 »• 2 »>
rr: •'-^ m -^ ^^ —y -y "c.
-V — . • X T-; - X — X — ^ - ^
3 2i r ; »> _L: 3 2 ; 3 »• C-i -U 3 S; ^ L i i 3 2 ^ - 3 2
2 2 ! r ! > - ' 3 2 2 ^ . r ; 3 2
Ci ii X - ^ X
. J - i - ^ ^C- »>^ - ^
<—N ^ " N . •<"*. ^''"S > " ^ ^W' w ^ > ^ ' "—' - ^ ^
^ ^ ; -x; - ^ ; j j
2 3 2 2 3 3 2
. '•V .-->. ^ i -^ - - ^ y ^ • - X ^ " ^ ^ " N > ^ -"X
N ^ - W ^ ^ •'W' X^^ > ^ ^ ^ ^ > • • •«-• -'•m^
^ Li"; ^ r^H CD i> o — r.i rn ' ^ ^ " ^ ^ " ^ " ^ ^ " ^ * ~ ^ ^ ^ • ' * ' s < ^ • < % ' <
3 2 3
O
>«- "«-\ •«- :
^ X
X ^
122
X
Si ^
^ X
<r
i—: X
X -^
X
<?• ^
^ : X
X ->
^ X
X ^
i - ' X
X
X
X ^
•r-. X
X - -
!—! X
i ^ X
X
^ X
- : X
1- r \ as K
:-! X X
X o N-C! i i l
x-' 2 X r-t ^
N ^ * • • • i - ; j
r^rt > ^ V ^ "^.
•<r fv r^
s. ><
•«-' 2 >-' 2 2 X ^ ^ X - i — ^
O • * — 3 O • * — 3 3 T O ^ 3 1 ^ O ^ 3 3 .i i ~ : •. •< > j ^ 4 , <
•<•> r—: -<^ »• •»* O ""^ •!"* -lil " -•* O •'^' r—• -"O *• • • -•* *•• X T^ : x ^ • • X I 4 > s -r-S • • X ^ r x - ^ —i ^
• ^ 2 r0 3 > 0 - r t 2 r 0 3 - 0 - r ^ 2 r r ; 3 3 3 k U J 3 3 i ; r - i » ' L J 3 C S ; C 2 i r - i » - L L l 3 2 i 3 3 X 3
•' : : ; 2 *' i j j - i _ 2 * LL- . ^ 2 r—!
• - C n 2 2 h > ^ 3 i Z 2 h - - ' C n 2 2 2 L J 2
>- =
r^ X
• • X
• ^ :-• "T
-^ ':: . V i j j ; ^ j j ^ 2 :'r' • - : ; ; • • " . ' ; ^ ;: .'.-' • = i • ! "<^ ' : •
IN •<-; Si
>— X:L —i
.- ;•;
•?r --' • \
i j j
:_; <r 2 1 - ^
>— X ' . • •
-y
3 <I 2 T
3 X
: i 2
>* • • ' - •
- •_ ; ^
2 2
-^V. .'•>» > " v - ^ ^ i " S • ' • ^ ^ ^ ^ " ^ • " ' ^ > ^ \ ' " X i.'-S --V . ^* . >•-»» --—V .<•%. y -N .*-%. . ^ N
-D —! r-i 'o - 3 -0 r\ 3 cs -o T-i r-i m -sr ji v: .-v 3 r - r •=?- " ^ -c- -C «^ <T ^ T « • L;l L l 3 L-l u l . 1 3 ^1 - 1 L l
< ^ - >C ^? C ^ 'O <i S)
o o NC \ X.-1 -r:
123
X
<r *
<r «
3 2 3
<r — ^
o -••• U 7 U ^
^ — T-t • • ^ . r^ • • X
X^ - r _
-^ Z-iX rx 3 r-i ^ s -i X
2 L ii — 2 'O 3 iV ; ; ^O X - - :^: ~~;
~ ~ 3 ^ ~ ^ ^
^ ^ J: s; ft^. n\ r" : (^i : .:
3 2 2 i2 ro
C -^ 2
i . 5— i— rv <r 3 2 2 ro ^
2 3 — -^ <: X
^ . — • 3 3 2 _J
^ 2 - ^ ' 3 -
'-i X 3 ^ - i 3 •T
3 i 3 2 — V ^ « - _
2 2 2 ^ ~ ^ — C
• ' "^ • ' • ^ r ^ . '^N > ^ s j ^ - * . ./-N
:"-i "^ •^ Ll >C r\ 3 'X r \ fN >s 3 3 3
> o -» :"i i-o <r 3 O^ >» CS C* C."~-
• < - • < • J - 4 . s
124
<:
<£
O "
-^ i \
^ 2
X
2 2 ? -
^ j ^ r-i X
H LI 512 3 2 2 2
<r
-C 2 T-i Tvi X X i— T-i
<:
! ~1 ^ •ri X
sD —
vj-;
a <r T-! 3 Ul
2 3 — ^ <I X
^ C< i- X
» ' 3 * » O r ^ i •<T-^"^ ' x i— -r^ - • T-i r-< X '•-- — "-O 3 vi 2 - : — X
^ i! "~ ^ '» 3 3 2 U 2 »
•i , •!
^ Ll --0
C-^. Ci Ci
;N 3 CN O O
^ < ^ < N -4
- < . < ^ <
1 <i < 4 . <
V^ G!
C X 2 2 2 2 ^ "1^ : . : ; . I ; . : ;--*
- ^* -- -^ .--' "- ."_
.-•N >-Si ^ ' • s . - -^ . « " \ - " ^ >^». •^^ s-^ s-^ '^.^ ^w' -«• w -
—! ? i r* *T j " ^ N'J X ^ O ««<*i " -^ .-H-^ - O ! i-i-^ *<-:
r.: '-.: . r • ^ : r-.l - : ^
2 3 2 -^ -C ^
-r --'
125
<L
—'• : V
<I »
2
x;
> J ! - ! - w
i— ! \
^ X 3
._ .*- 2 2 "- 3
Ll = r-i i \ L l C^ " • • - » •* • - o r-i r-i '^ is. ^ —i ^ *•
ro 3 3 3 >0 2 f^ f^ ^ : ^ ; f^: ; ^ : r*.j ; '
2 2 ' " - X
r, X
3 < : 3 2 2 2 2 ? 0
i \ ><^. : -*:
U -
2 — i
r - -rn 3
• ^ ^ 2 ;
•—! '>— 2
;'< ^
r-T
U -
X
* •
<; N '4
m>.
i \ ><j
3
2 L
•
U -
N -<
• . •—
r . >
•^
rt^
2 ! — •
' ? ^
3
X T - "
»> • '
hC-.
> »«<*,
rx — '<: 3 — ^ r—•
2 H-« Ci
T - !
. Si
> 2 • - ^
r-t
' X
2 3 2 2 2 3 - i C X 2 2 2 2 2 —•
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o c - o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o 3 > O —i r-i 'O <r ul vC i\ 3 > O r- ?-i r: <r Ll >C i" 3 CS O ^ T-i r; T 3 >0 x 3 0 O - Ti ri *- T 3 ul Ll ul Ll 3 13 ul Ll L;1 >C -0 -^ ''C "O •>i -^^ --' ^•j -^i Ci Ci Ci C-i Ci Ci Ci "i Ct ri r-- --i Ci C-i C<
^ x! -C xj <; N X i \ ="\ >v i \ X X rx rs 3 3 3 3
126
. s
Ci
>0
CJ
3 '^ r-i X 3 B. 2 oi t-i ro 3 ^ 3 •«?
2 3 1 -^ <: X Ci 2 UJ u_ - i 2
•XJ r - 3
r\ i—
* • T-! iT; >C ;-! 3
— o 3 >0
D-
f^
^^ X - _ i
. s
a>
rv 'O . - ^ i
2
2 2 ; : i : I ;
^ L l SD ^^
•^ : 1^.1 ^ . : -•*•,, r ^ . ; r ^ . ' r ^ . j
2 i--H X
iZ 2 2 2
O O - i r-i > cs
s; -c T-! 3
i-( -•» •>-!rox rs.— T- •• -T-iro ^ 3 o 2 - i ^ ro 3 <= 2 -^ Si r i LU 3 " Si 1-f S; r-i Uu 3 3
i - : » ' _ 3 2 i u u ii r -<» .— 3 2 2
2 • - ro ' 3 -^ 2 iz ! - ro 3 3 ' i : ^ X 3 L l " - H 3 > G ^ : : i : - i X a j > C ^ 3 3
2 2 - i
O O ro <r
•Ii 2
N-D [N. 3 D- CS CS
X 2
2 i :
> o > o
"" 2 6 2 -3— "" 2 3 2 i Z 2 2 2 2 J - i . J : ^ < Z X 2 2 2 2 - ^ J^--,-^.— : : • :'r^ i : ^ ^ : ' < ^ : • • • : : ; : ' : V : ""^ :*-' • ' - ' '-^
.--^ . - •
< V < N < ;. " i V •«
*<«^ .*-% > ^ ---s . ^^N > - x ^^w ^ • s ^ ^ ^ f^K -"^v y-*. -""X .-^s. y - ^ X ^ ^ N • ' • s . -""^ S « ^ > • • N ^ N ^ S ^ \ ^ N ^ >W^ N«^ > ^ % • x ^ ^p*- ' ' ^ ^ N_^ \ ^ "w** >—^ > - •
^ r-i ro ^ iji s: N 3 ?> o -* r-i ro <r Ll -xi > 3 c -> ^ \.y s^y - s ^ _ ^ •«^ . ' . ^ > _ ; - r ^ - H — r —- T ^ - ^ ^ — — ^ ^ —
l>rt '<^ i«rt >«r ><-. >«-i v ~ "M-! N ^ ««-i »<^ >«-. ««-i >«^ N-t >*> .N-. "St-- K-^
127
* « X
as . s
X
O X tr 3
<-x
X T - :
.> X
r—( • «
N j
^ *< > •
: ^ <
•' - ' ^ , - '
• —
7 — :
! ; >.
r - i
rf^
2 •-^ 3 3
—: 3 fi:
-r-i
— 2 i
? H
2 i — *
•
-r-! 3 Gi
• — !
3 GJ
• •
Sl: ^ • <
I
ilZ = * •
• . ^ , -
^ •sn r*-:
*r
<^ fTt
» k
X >'~S.
-H >>.
- ^ • ^
N * ^
= = f^^*" > ^ ^
» k
X V—^
r-J
«
-••
•r-*
*« •x5 s *4
»w
; \ ro 3
«« -H -^ SJ
3 2 > — ;
^^
• •
1-'.
3 1 ^ !
f r s
2 r H
II ^
• «
-r-i f
- C :
<< ro >-n ui •-• 2 2 2 — ro _ i ^ i^ X 3
-^ ^ 2 - ^ .^ ^«JS^ S^ ^ « 4 B ' ^ B rf^M • ^ B
3 3 •—: r-f I—1 •—i
3^ r 5 ;
i ~
iz i — : • - •
^^ i^^
—•
r— X T . ; fl^rf
2
"^ :* ;
(— 2 : • - T
• - • l ^ B
u_
3 0 TV. *s ; • ^ ^ s -4
a>
•— r\ 2 ^ --^CSJ .- * • ^ v
'*: >—
--
^ —
r ^
i — f
a f r ^ • •
2 ^ • ; — • • « •
3 X 3 •<:
':— -UJ
C -<r X 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 —•
; • . . ^ ^ ^ 2 | * • • - ' ' ^ :*-^ ; ' < : 'r^ •'•< '-^ :'•
>-x. y ^ .*"», > ^ -^"S ^ ~ \ / ^ - - ^ . ^«^ >->\ >•»,
N_^ y ^ N ^ ^ > • • N—^ > » ^ ^ ^ >—/ ^ ^ ^^.^ > • •
—a ?*.» r<^ •«• I:": vTl ^ "r: rv^ ^ __• ^ . « ^ 1 . . ^ ( *^ - -fc ( ,•%_ I ^ 1 ^ 1 ^ 1 ^ . s ^^r „ '< , • • . *< X '< •- » -S s ' , 4 . •< •* < . , . ^
K^ *«-: * o ?«« N * ^ o H ^ ^rt !v- -^ *^
2 UJ 2 3 2 -- <u -! 2 2
^ — W ^ ^ B M ^ a ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ H . * ^
2 2 2 . i . 2 2 r H -J:: 2 2 2 2 2
r 0 < r i i l > C ! \ 3 C > - O — i r - i ^ ^ 3 -' ^1 ^ ro ^ i-o "" -^ ^ "-r <r -:" "T »«-: >1--. IH-; ><^ >.^ •><- »r> f-O x-^ K > >»~ "<^ * 0
2 3 — 2 r^ <: X ~ r
y - s > ^ - * % * ' ' ^ . y ' ^ >-N. * ^ .--^^ - - ^ > ^ ^ * > • • N ^ > . * • - S ^ - - • w ' ^ ^ S w * S ^ '
i \ 3 C s o - ! r> ro«r3 C" T •T 3 ': ul Ll 3 -1 *<-i ""O V- -.- s o .-v^ hO •<-•. "v .
128
•^
• ) « •
s ••! i 2
- - N
• •
SD s 4
• - » .
r H ! \
3 'O w Si
. ^ V .
1* ?*?
iil <r 2 LU '
•—
•»^ -r-^ v
• «.»
<r -^ i \ ^-' rOiXi
4 9 ^
2 » t : ; %• •
2 ii *— -3
=
—' ««
^ s -<
as
i \ ><; S i
< . s
- ^ -r-i x . '
Wi^ 4 . S
s
• ^ If
3 s
• «
T H
- ^ S i
• •
T H
— S i
*-x
«* x ;
»> rx ro S;
T- t
; 'H
•—
r H
Ox LiJ - ^ •y
^ >" s^-i N-^
C^ - ^ - > T - (
• N - " ^
ro ! \ ^
2 UJ T 1 —
^x.
• —
^x.
!—! i H
o ^ '4
jNx
- ^
>c •sr;
2 ULi 2 >—
x-^ ' » • ' • _ "v
Qx
ro 2 LU "T !—
Ci
x ^
- ^ ^ x
e
4 . S
. ^ s
i H
• ^ i ^
4 » >
a
%-< !i '— s
• •
T H
3 S i
T H
*« SD V '«
Bo
rx ro S i
4 . S
X ^
•r-! >^ •-*U
«». (1
s ^
t :
••J J
S
• •
- H
3 Si
-^x
* • SD s -<
.« fS. 'O 3
* —
ro '-s
r-i -^
2 »•-
! "0
% 4 r ^
rx <T "O
; • *
2 2 -j _J 2 2 iz Z 2 r-i - * 3 - ! - — — 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 r-i >- 3 X
:': 3 i ^ ^ -y 'r: ...^ —. -y r?^ ;_; _ ; :": •"• :"• :": •*• —; UL. 5 i i
X
2
>0 ! \ 3 CS o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o — r-i ro <r iil >c !-x 3 ch o TH r- •<•,
Ll -o sD >c >c xo --c >o >c "x r^ !x r\ ; *o "o ro "o ro f*
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . o — r-i 'O <r ul xi i\ 3 > o — <r
•Ns
f^.
• ; ^
r -l KS
N*-"^
rx v*
i \ rN s o
•J>^
> s
»4-!
0^ rx so so >* »< v" so so so ^o •«*. so so so
129
^
"T >my
&
^
:n.
^
J i -!- *
i ^ 2
r-i iSi
5f ^
— ^
* ^
rn SJ 3 >C
^ 3 r-i * "*^ L l
r-i •b « « • « Sk
V *< ? hiM
^ ^ - ^ T - ! <»*
"Z **^ ^ '^^
•-i -J^ T —
s,- ^ xQ w x; ^-'
^x • >x rH -r^ i
^ f -H - rH • ^ < 5 ' » 2 ; r - ^ ' 3 = S i 3 3 S ; -^
•* ' 4
2 2 2 2
O O O O ' J ^ <r L l O C? CN c>
' — ; • < : .
-i j pv ::;5 :•> -^ TH : •< rr- - ^ u l x j C 2 c-« > o o o o o o o —: .-<-: •''-<-• - r *?• * - - ^ <r T «T
2 2 2 2 2 2 ri " ^ -"-^ ; - ; • .•':^ ."< i"-' r~^ •• i - _ ^ I
^ " ^ . ^ S . /I»"V y - V . 4 ^ > , ^l*K , < ^ > " ^ 4<—lb - ^ < b 4 ^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ N ^ >_4» S ^ \ ^ ^ > . ^ S,^ > , ^ > . ^ •S-*' >_/• N«^ " ^ ^ >«.^
-^ ^w- - ^ -. •< . ^>r w ^ X-; ^ -J.^ ^^ v. ^^
H H 3 — - - 3 2 2 X _
2 3
X, V
- < X < X < 4 \ 4 <« <
' r < r - < ? - < r < r ' r < r - ^ < T « r < r ^ ^ ' < r - ^ < r < r - ^ < r
130
X ,
cs rs
-3«T
<»s x ^ -x^ y ^
— • « •
•^ >^ s <».
<as r 4 * ^ -XX L i
;::: ' -?- « • »
•if
^ o
• » - - ^
^ o ^ rs - L l
* > -• « •
3
O ^
4 , . « *
x ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ > ^
• ^ r H
r-i ^
X -4
fx *? ^^ '"^ T-i
X ;
^ —
•«^ x-x
;;X —
r-i *
• * - -
< • ' ^ i ^ • C-i •
2 ; 2 i S i - rH
r-i — i: • pxs
rs 3 - ro *- 3 3
^ r 3 - ! - i - i - 3 2 2 2 2 >-' 3 X i-
2 ri
;~j i r H • « ^ » 3 3 ' « ' 3
— 2 2 2 2 2 ri
0 0 0 rH Ci "O
0 : 0 . ' s o
- - T «r <• '=' •«'
. " • ^ - - ^ - " S ^ " ^ - ' • ^ . ^ V . ' " N . ^ ^ > » ^ < ^ , * ^ . / ^ ^—S, .^-Vi
< ^ • "^ >«'^ r v ••*^: ? ^ ' ^ ^ ^ ^ : ^ : ' ' < ^ r-^ : . "* -. ' ^ > <
" v ^ V ^ * « ^ h O »^r-i » 0 < - * ^ ^ < ^ « » « ^ ^ . ^ ^ i ^ ^ . ^ * . f . \ » ^ : *. •, x» "v„ x_, - . " ^ , ^,..
r- T <?• <r <T <r
s: rs 3 3» o — -i -o - 1 - 1 _1 u~ >C ^0 ^ x
131
• !
3 X
• X rs
<Z X
• "N
T
2 !^ uu •' "^
-*~ f— '• •
t" in •-^ i s < •xX > ^
C^ .x-x
* w y x -xx
rH rH
'^imi - ^ ^
ii j — •^ 3 r"~t •
>•** — » ir^ H-i
.-—s
V -4
rs •T
2
• ^ >^
•«r 3
• H
^w —
^-x
T H
x.^
X ^ ^ . X
f
•• ' rH * iil
•
r-^
^\,
x^ rH
• — ^
•
o -^ "^
^^
!—»
. X
2
• ;^
i «^
13 ^^
/ ~ s
r H
^ x
l2i *« ro • 1 ^ .
j — 2 i — i
r^
;*•-
z> • •
ro •ro Si
i —
2 H T
_"- ;*;
O'
3 u_
. ; i
> H
_.--x f—"»
>~. ! — •
x ^
r—
m • •
><-; M^
««
— 2 •r—1
.--'' _"-
i—!
1—
X
-^
I
2 j—i
>— = « •
x ^
5x rs ••r 3 2 • — i
^^
>— 2 !—< ."w'
;-.
as
X -% " 4
i H
as
<z u ;
S b
X s -4
rH ».
<I rs
as
X ;^ri s ^ '
. : : • : <z. "Z ^^
»«
M
Z
m
<r as
X
3
: , ' ••
2 • : — :
^^
>— 2 •—! . • - •
-.
r ^^ • ^
•
; — r
ri •-*• r~
—. ; .
^^
• - w ^
—-!
^ , .
• •
» "^
> k
T-T
^^ * •
V . ^
*. .^ • - , ^
"T
-r^.
IZI r — •
"^
»— 2 ; i — '
-^ '.
^ >.
X i ^
» b
Lw
<r » s
X ^
3 b
• I
•C 3 k
X x " ^
. t
: _: <^ ^^ _*
•
•
N - i ^
-^ "^
^
U . ^
5—
X - ; ! —^
— i
* •
"C -_ ;
» b
> x
ro f^'.
'— •T>'
• r ^
.-- -.
T—:
^ . .• ;
! Zl —' -^
• *
^ . M
^ • ^
=
•r^
: f^;
— 33 '—« .".X
- •
> b
X --~^ -^ s
.^ 2^ — s^
:
T-^.
,,: ^ :
— m —1
." ^ _*.
r-^
^ . ' ^ t
i —
33 ^^ •• .*.
r ^
• ^
>—*. - ^ !> Xv
<r __|,: 2 ; H - •
xnl
:
r H
*— ^ 1
— -—-.-- .-.
s
a :%
• b
X cc •
c 2 ( — •
* 1 ^ ' ^
, :
• ^
-"^r
'— 2 -
• _ * •
.-.
D-
:,_ U ~
T H
}: • — ^
^ • <
."- ••
— U. O- j i i 3 HH - i rH
O ^ u'
o •'•• --> < ; >o sD
Ll 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Os o —i r-i ro - ul s: rs 3 Ox o •— r-i sD -x; rs fs. >>. v >x rs fs -"X rx ' v 3 3 3
-i -i ro -^ o o o ^ i i l -x ^
3 CN ^ CN 0-s x NT ^ - r V ^ -r
132
x^ \ xO
2 ' ^ * 4iT —I : " -
^ •-' X X . ^ ^ *
x_^ s 4 r H as
2 s o
^ Z> rH 3> -•Si z> cn TH • • • • ^ ^ • • ^ ^ ^"^
*<^ N ^ >— "<* ^ . . ^
i UJ • * O
:> -!- ri ^
! - ! ^ \ : ^ : f * i * . 4
•sO 1^1 f^i _ ^ : ^ i _ ^ : ^
^~ 2 2 —4 X ^ ^ 2
2 2 ^
2 2 — 2 U . - 2 : : ^ X 2 E ! i ^ _ _
x,.^ S^^ >,^' v ^ > ^ > • • > - /
i i U - X i C ^ X i i l i n i i ^ X :; >o r-i _:
Hr "** : : 2 ~ ~ ^ - ~ : " • " " " ' '
; J X j • X ; j j ••>s ' - ^ ^ ^ •J** - x ^ ^ <
rvs > C- 0» CN O O O •r- -rr -^ -sr <?" Ll Lfi Ll
o o o o o o o c o rH r-i ro 'T Ll NO r 3 CN o — r-i ro «r Ll
> < * W -s < r-i c-\ c "•: t^. -T'
133
^ x ».
<: X
3 X
LJ X
»b s
3 X 3 <: 3 " — - X
2 X
2 » <I i
X
Z> 2 2
i I>
>-< ^ • • ^ ^
< ^ • *
*« ><
uLi
2 • — -
i —
•
«« -•-x
3 •^
; ^ 2 !—i
X 1 3 =
a a
<I ^ LO rH
». as
X X l> S2 ». =
<i: <r 3 r—^ Mmm
»s i-H
3*
3 i —
as
-^ as
• —
•
* •
^ ul
'^
z u_:
^ • ^
• ' , '
*<'. ».
X S s
rrj - ^ .-n
2 »• — X
— • ^ —
X 2 ^ 2 2 U_ J_ U_
1 3 " ^ — ! 3 S : 3 3 3 ^ 3
-^ 2 3 ;^ ; - 2 2 2
• ^ L-l- XJ Nx "i C i -r^ -~^ •—'. X^ ,-X <-x ^-s
i ^ ^ ul -O i x 3 CN O r • •' T -:- — -rr -r- «?• ;
i ; >,-^ ^ *. < . . X Px X. X, :v c; c- o — Ci
1 Ll ^ ^ X-
134
s r
<Z «•• LU X
o -
X
LU X
2 ~ H-f «
<r . * • :
>^ e
cn • -= <z c:: « • O^ as
O •> X T H X *?• - <
3 X
<I -
O X
2 2 2
•X" s "4
J ' ^ •• z> r-i - O 2 O 2
3 ro :*: ^ ^ -l^i !^i ^.^ r" ;
- ^ s -4' ^ 3
as xc-
3 <s 3 ri 2 3 2 - •• —^ as rH r s - :
3 X 3 ro 3 3 3 3 3 3 — <? —•• 3 3 3 '^i ^ : "S: ^
^ ^ _, ^ rx
_ ^
Ll ul >o > cc; o- o — xC X i x : '«.
j j j >«i ^_J T r ^ ^ " g ; — — : ; ^ : ' • ' - I " ,"?' • - ' • 'r' .•':' " ^ "r' ^ "-'
O -1—; •• .j N^ ^ •-; v.- ^x -- ^ ~x ''^ 1 ~. 1 so «T T^ ^r '— •~-.r: ^ X s 4 : ^ XC i4 , X ^ ; X . . ^ ^ X . ^ ^ ^ ^ » 4 > X ^ X X _ ; ; T ^
—'•^—' -^ — - r H •— — r—. ^ - i ' - . ; T ' "^i r-i r< r i T i ~^ r ; c--
o
135
r-i
1-. 2
; t - * i
- • • 1
LiJ
•', •' <r
/"X
x ^
•^x
•^ • w
r H • ^
» b
2
fO S;
2
^
i H
:!
-x^
?~"
»<
; « i
r—f i i l
- s . ^
i = i l >
ro ro ><•> so.
^. » ^ .
o _
»—
r H
j :
T H
i " ^
ro S i
2 2 3 2 u . u i : 3 X U J i - i < : i - i 2 3 2 U J ^ i = i i : ^ U _ i - i L ^ i - ^ 2
I > - i Z> _ 3
o ro — ro o cs "o ro -CN ^ S; rH Si '*r
rs ;: —!
2 3 2 -UJ r-i 3 - 2 3 2 uJ Ci 3
!l !i — !; •— t—I 4-^ i-H
3 O 'H —
i-i U- :_ 3 2 -_
• ^ U J S 3 3 C N O ^ : ' - i r o - c " u i > G r s 3 C N O - ^ r ' r o c - ^ ~ t N < X < - . < - . « » < •4 . i r ^ s o s o ».x
X V. <
S s
ii ii 2 : 2 ^
2 r -i : -^ X
— ---! ro ^
\
r-i
ro vD
\ ' — rH i s i
. w -o : ^ • x ? ^ : 1
x ^ - ^ •
•T- 'O ro _j — _ j ^^ - ^ s o s o .-<
3 <; '^ TO "O 'O
•^ -^ •<;
2 ^ 'O
Z> O i -
3 -Jt r — ro r-i
i i r-i •iH •<-<' i i
!i s ^ •••••
z> ro
Li •<;
. • -T 3
o - 2: !S Ch X —i ^-' O U. 3 - r • * 3 •• •Jit ;o:- •- ^ 3 <; ro 3 3 uu r-i c-i - ^ • • 2 ^ as • • fc
- i . ^-^ r— as r x r H r s
»<-• s<^ r^. -^^ M^ •""• ^'^
- _ i ! t r o — i i i * ^ >-J Li iu_ i s O 3
- * ^ ^ ^ ^ . . . ^ y ^ ^ * ^
O O
• c - <?•
O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o p o c o o -iro^Li^crs30^o-r.ro'ru^>o;s^C)^^^.^^^-^>^
136
<r -r-
T 2 ?— LiJ
* 2 *r :—
_ ! i s \ ab - ^
L 1 2 i . r H i j j a.
\ 2 O
3 'T xT x .^ V,'
2
2 r-
O 2 • b ^ ^
ro -3
o^" ^'^ Ukd T—! ^ ^ : . ^ „ ^
— 3 H- - n - 3 - ^ 2 —
_ ri ^ -p 3 —: ^ <r r-i rH
•^^ —. T T T i j i S ^ x T c " ' ¥ >':u.x • ^ • « - 3 3 i : u j - ^ : i : u _ u _ < r
• v o - ^ x i ! < r ' ^ i : i ^ : : i _ u _ 3 3 ; 5 u U ^ i J i U _ 3 3 U _ 2 ^
; : i I > ! - X O ^ I ^ ^
. ^ ^ 4 ^ ^ . ^ - V . - ^ ' >^^ N„«i' . ^ N - ^
:rs 3 D>- O •s i \ s . 3
4-X . . ^ , ^
o <r L"
^ .*-x >-x x ^ >-^ . 1 ^ -i-x .'-X .0^ .'"s .-s. . ^ _ j r^.: »«4 - ^ -^.^ -.^^ ^ ^ x ^ -.^^ > . • . ^ •»_> x ^ s ,^ 7~r , ^
r^ o^ n-> r ,. r s ^x x^ -v "v, -X ' v *>v "> ._* .—
^ ul -C
X
i-i •<J -r-. •^ 2 ^
:> r-r 2 ^ ^
2 • ^
i x,* k_ —J ""x i— f— ^ ^"~ r H x ^ •—
• % ^ ••••-. -se-•NT: r».: :"- >^ ."< r \ '-^
— -; _ .r
; _ j
*<^.' t^ ^'
• . —
X • - •
->-
O --; 'T
W ^
It
^^ , s 4
•—
. 4 ^ .
s '4
^r
^ ' : ^^ •^H*
—
N - ^ -
S O
<r
'•.jj i^ i/l
4Mi^ •val^ • " ? " t .
•C u ^ t
T x i i ' i l i ' ^ i i X M LU UJ L U 2
^ Z^ ^ ^ :• r -r- i . .—: r^ • • : .-. .-. 2 ' :_. ; ! ,"• '^ • : i—; •-• 2 : •"'• 3 Li. !— Cs. 2 U_ ^ i '—' O" 3 ^ 3 ^ 3
S5 • X w CN o ^ r-i ^n -r- ul <• *r <r -cr «r 3 ul - v i i, -. n->
CN O ;=-; xT? >o >c -c >c <:- x! -(:! "s "X
~< -o <r 3 -•X - S X , -X
137
\ z>
• ili
2 3
* O U l —•
.— 3 2 3 — 2
• -"^•^ ^ ^ - U - O ^Jl -ri '<r 3 r H 0 3 3 3 - < 2 0 3 ~ ^ < -• '^ CI.; iil TH f— UU. i—, LU "— -^ 3 CZ, 3 -— •O " ' 3 ili U_ X
r-< rH 3 •rH <r -.c -3 1 3 3 i O 2 3 3 3 —i —i 3 3 — = •C • S ^ O i i i ' S s ? — r H - — 2 T - S 2 2 3 r H 2 r H 2 ~ i S X — •— 3 T - i 3 - r - _ :
- f - * 0 I— U-ii:. 2 ^ 2 I » - 3 2 I j 2 L i » « 2 3 J : : U . X 2 - d ~ » ^ . = i " ^ E - « Z > • O - ^ 3 i _ ^ L U r H » r H a 3 3 U J « r - < " 2 — i - C C L U s T - ^ ' r H * rH • • ' " • ' — - ^ 2 •'• 2 _ i - : • • ••• O 2 r—i i l i 2 • • i • • O 2 - ^ 3 rH _ ; 2 ••• • • ! • • >^ 3
S i S ; -^-r" r H a 0 3 S J 3 - S ; - ' - ! = •^^= O S ; 3 S j r H a — l a - ^ a O S i 3 S i 3 S ; » • — : 3 >-< i i ii S J S i i i: S i i i i= S J S ; 3 il
2 : Z > C i — • u i i 2 i i i 2 3 - U J 2 - U J 2 i — 2 i j J 2 3 2 L U 2 r — 2 U J 2 u L i 2 3 2 u U 2 L U 2 r i L U • ' - ' • 3 2 X Z > r - i : > : - ^ Z > i - i Z > i - i - H O - — M O ; - ! ^ Z > - i I > ! - ( - . ^ • - . 3 > - ^ ! ^ . : J :
: l . i > : 3 2 2 C ^ 2 U . ^ - < 2 ; i 2 U _ ' 3 U . 2 - j _ ^ i : ^ 2 c Z 3 u l 2 i i ~ 2 Z Z ^ i l 2 i ^ 2 Q l 3 2 3 I • S ^ ' S ^ >—• > i ^ V i - ' > . • N . ^ - . . . ^ • . . . • ' ^ . ^ > B > - ^ . X S _ X - ^ g ? N ^ - . . ^ N ^ ^ > ^ S , ^ N . ^ - ^ « ^ N ^ ^ > , ^ < , ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ . ^ ^ . , ^ , . . ^ , , „ ^ ^ y,^ 4,^^^ S „ ^ ^ > , ^ S ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
3 0 o rH r-i ro <r Ll <! !\ 3 0^ o rH r-i ro • iil >o rs -3 0 o ^ r-i rs T Ll >c 3 0-- o -rH r i -i : : - ! : - ; '. " ^ "r-^ : . ~ }•-< u ^ -i ^ -^ i -mm > :- m • ^ • • : L l - < 5 S 2 > C > C v C > 0 - > C - 0 •<i •S -x. >. i \ 'x, - N fs Nx 3 3 3 3
!>«
\ T - r
-_ b ^ M
» b
"^ \ T- t
;•; » b
y * ^
4 ^ ^ . ;
<-• : . ^ b ^ •- 4 " S B ^
'O • .-^S
>^ i \
4 - X
jm, ;
s *4
SD
a
. ^ }— X . X
2 2 ~ ] - 'b.f J
Zl
-^^ r\ i"^
.J .J
-1 r*:^
^ J 3 J
^^ ^ n ^ M
-^
—• : ; • *
f
- - X
—^
r: O.: ^ ^ 4 s f
»• -c
4 ^
•—i x,^
-o . s
^ 4 - X
. ^ -»
•
r H
- * i i l
•
o _
;.".
: j « :
b ^
* -^ * • : • * :
* .^ ""-^ ab
.-^N, • 'w ' - ' " V
""^ W >
«
^ J « J ,
•
. ^ -•-
• ^ ^^ Na^ 3 Z
>- - ] ! - 2
• • r j •••
^ - ^ 1 ^ !"e:
^ ~ . . ^ —' .4U. ^ ^ -£— • ^ - M X _ d_l ;:-! '-s = •• ; j j •11 Ll_: LLI 3 ^ = — ^s' U J 3 *
3 - r - < 0 2 2 3—^_• — i— \ w 2 •— >— Ns *• r-i
rH i - 2 rH C-i 3 • .". r i ^ 2 ^ ^ - H :'; * ^ i-^i
•rx, fft, ' ! -— ! >—! " ii ^ S i »• ~ i - ~ r- w ro !- Ci >-i ro — r-i r-i ri — ri — - : 2 U : 2 0 i : ^ u J 2 ? - 3 0 i . u U 2 — U J 3 U J r - r - 2 3 2
J ii Si
• 2 O r-i LU i ^ 2 — J *; ^~ ^ <
^ ^ ^ v r^-
S 2 Z> 3 3 ^ I> • ii iui ii O ^ X ii L i !! Z>
L: i i . ^C .—: .»« >- X => O
r-.i -O "T 3 >G ^^ 3 CN O rH X 4 > < N •«
O T L l >C "s 3 CN O rH r i •o '< . ' 4 ' ' H 4 b < - '4 *o »< «o -o
X . ^ S ^ - - s ^ , - %.«,»• > « • S..** Nw"* N - ^ N ^ ' S . ^ N ^ * • » - • > . * i '
^ 3 x j r v . 3 C N O - ' ^ r i N : ! T L I X : * o ^ r o * o •o 'OT '« r<r<v 'T ' * r -<?"
S x
* 3
138
r— u ^ U ,-- H -"T -^l ^ .s \ O W^ ii i ^ H * ^^ »s 2 ; O j — i i l ! »• 2 Tvj " 3 i-H T - r-i • ^ • ^ a. ». X - ^ O rH rH
a
o b. 4
2 ^ 4
X <2:
2 2
\ i - : :
¥ X ii
• ^ / •S^ U .; rf- s o .v^
~4 U ; «»• JU - _ : ^ LU r H " J ~
3 * 3 2 3 • 3 r H 2 2 N . 2 - 3 3'«»> - 3 » - " ~ 3 U : 0 » > 2 j— C 2 ^ \ r ' " ; 2 3 r - H 2 3 — • —-e^ , . . .s —
• - i 3 0 3 * • - ] T 1 C 2 2 0 - 3 3 2 ^ JiS 2 - J ^ r i 3 L i - f c a . r - i i H r O « r H 3 » » a . . a fcas^r-a . ^ s . , X • •
3 2 0 0 i t — L i . M i i - i - O i-^-r^ O — ii — f i ! 3 * - iO 3 5 3 L U 2 0 U l i i i 2 — O 3 U J 2 : — L U 2 U i 2 = ' ' 2 — ' 3 i z — U i 2 L i J 2 ^ Z > > - i ! i i i i i Z > r - X i i iJi i ! Z > i - < X I > — Z > ^ il u : i ^ X U : i i ^ X O - ^
i : > 2 < Z 2 ; j » i £ i r u l 2 i J . 2 C 2 i u _ d 2 i i i l 2 2 U _ 2 ! i Z 2 L ^ u l 2 ^ X U _ 2 2 3
xo fs 3 CN o ^ r-i ro <r ul >c rx 3 CN o r o r o ' ^ r o ^ T - c ^ ^ « r « r - 9 - ^ T L i
• S - " ^ >^^ .^N . ' - ^ > ^ - < ^ ^ ^ *^S ^ > ^^ --"^ - ^ -••^ >^b • • S-iK* ^ ^ '^-^ > ^ "»•• X ^ > • • ^^^ > , • N ^ *^<» • • ^ > • • X ^
s '• *•<% «•• ' -^ xj*: 'Xs ;*r ^v "^^ _ ^ "*.; " o -c* ' •"* • " >C xl >0 <: *C ^ ^
r-i
o r-i ^ -^ CS rH rH
• r ^ r H
2 3 I > 3
3 • s
"~
3
.--
S y ^ V N . ^
<-
T ^
O •i-
—; I t
- ,
. ^ s s
•x^ u l
-
;— X • ; •
2
4 - X
< ; . x » ^
> " x
Ci 3
'-H
^^ rx
% < •
j ;
~''
r • ^ T ^
:. -4
^^ fgt
Lli ^ f ^ t
— >**.
| > ^ • ^
T - ^
^^
. " - ' •
• • •
^
4^-S
D^
H *4
^^ 3 ;
3 C j -w '
—
o r H
CN
r H
x ^
• ^ 3
i t
4
^x. x.^
V ^4
CN
r ^
r— X L;-t
2
4 ^
• S O
X s
2 . " - 4
3 : •— LU ~
\^ T ^
L.
2 UJ
-'^
; ."* • ^ .
^ O 2 U.O
o ro : : : i _ l *<l
•cro -"T ? ^ UJ ^ "
2 2 2 ii ¥
- ' 3 ^ 2 *-N , •• ro 2: -J - -
i— ro •• X •o ro <L
rH :^ uU 2
3 2 3 — Li il. — ii > r—. •J' •--' . ^ • • : • _ ; ^ . ^ - ' S^.4
2
o -^ r-i r o ^ 3 s : > x 3 C N o - ^ I 7< 7ii
ii s\ ^ ^ C . . _ . --s.
Ul '^ ¥ X ii
4-X ^ 4 ^ ^-S
s-* >.y x„» ~-^
-C- % 3 •> ri -".i Ci c<
L
139
2
fO — Lil <»' s 3 3 ?s • - ^ ^•. 2 O 2 -Ki-
"^ u J S s ^
-1
on i— — « — • • ' • • r- i •—
*^ --4 s 4 ^ ^
_U 3 ? - 2 3 U J 2 0 L : _ i _ J 2 i - 0 3 L J 2 I > i : i < I X i - ^ O - ^ i i i V i i Z v i - i X i i i i l i i O - i - i 3 3 i i : U J U _ X 3 i i : r O 3 f 0 3 i i : L U ' 0 3 ! ^ 3 i J : : 3 L ^ - i 2 ^ < I 2 : U . i _ U . ; : i _ 2 U . 2 3 U - 3 2 U -
U.; T - ^
H-^
M —
•^
ul
\ ^^ r^
»o r^.
Sb
o • *
, : » • <
—»
~ ZZ 32 •
«« ^ '4 • ^ ^
^^ frx\
.^x x . ^
as
r H • •
^ . 1 s 4
^
2 X " 1 - ^ . " 1 3 a as
r i • • ^ ' ^ ^ ^ '•> '4
. - ^ t " ^ l
3 ^^ Zl m
*« s "4 ^ • ^
^^ f ^ t
— T
f^.
_ - -cn
i ^ ;"
2 UJ _;
r^
^
.,_<
2
2
^ X •• o
f^\ !%t
L U 2 U u 2 » 2 - 3 2 - ^ - Z > - H X ^ ^ ^ 7 - i i i L i i ^ - i X ^ ii i - i X ^ i : 3 U :
4"" -" ^ ^^ ' ^ ^ ^ ; ^ ^ \ ^ \ / ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ \ -""N .#"v >•% >-s . -N, . ^ >*s, y"v >-N -b* >*> .-—V ./•N. y ^ ^s, y^k > >. >-^ 1^^ >-b, .^v ,< v S^^ x _ ^ > , . • > • • >—' •«*• > • • N - ^ N_^ "^.^ b^,^ N , ^ ^ ^ . ^ ^ s ^ ^ . ^^^ .^^^ 1^^^ „ ^ ^ „ ^ ^ ^ , ^ ^ ^^^^ . ^ , ^ ^ , , ^^ .^^^ 1,^^ . ^ ,,,_^ .. ^ ^ . ^ ^ ,„^^ .^^^ , , ^^
! \ CD CS o ^ r.1 ' ^ ^ LO ^ r \ c^ CS o 'T-? "> r^ ^ Li"; sD i \ E 0^ o -^ r-." ** ^ u": - r rv z ; cs o • " ---
140
. - J ^
- * ^ ^ ^ B ,
* l -
2 <Z
LU < £ -
i—i
2 <L X
£ * <r i—
<L , »_ ^ • ^
u J
2 <E 4 ^ X
•LU , • ,
H—
• * 2
ro
asUJ O i - i ;i i - o •ro • -»s ». ro
D • • O 3 i i i s '< _ • - '• 'i X •<
rTL-: !«l ! ; ^1
i=i • » 2 a a X •
I!
Li.1 i-ii czL 2:4—•' X i—<•
3 - . I > ^ < r X 5 C ^ . 7 ^ i 7 i U - _ 2 S 2 i = i
2 u l 2 u l ^ Z 2 - U . Ul-ul^i^ . U _ 3 5 u _
X C 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o o o 4 ^ _. c«.- r; «r ul >c is 3 CN o rH r-i ro <r O O O O O O O O O O O ^ — r H - ^ - :
II M^
APPENDIX B
TABLES OF ORDERED STRESSES
141
142
OaOERED STRESSES SCENARIO-! ( : ? L I T SP»CE» I - . I ' - ?S : Z^MA-.r -nCULJS
r-*»OR»i STRESS
3 3 * 9 . 2 0 1 6 2 3 . 1 0 1 3 1 7 . 4 0
7 0 7 . 4 7 3 3 « . S 7
• 5 . 9 1 3 9 . 4 0 2 3 . 2 9 2 3 . I S 2 2 . 4 1 ia.32 1 9 . 2 6 1 9 . 1 6 I 4 . d l 1 4 . 3 2 1 4 . 2 7 1 3 . 2 1 1 1 . 7 7 1 0 . 9 7 1 0 . 9 2 1 0 . 6 1 1 0 . 4 1 1 0 . 2 3
7 . 3 1 6 . 4 0 9 . « 0 4 . 1 1 3 . « « 3 . 6 6 3 . 9 9 2 . 5 9 2 . 2 4 1 . 7 * 0 . 4 3 0 . 3 3 O . l S 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 1
- 0 . 2 2 - 0 . 3 4 - 1 . 4 3 - 2 . 7 3 - 3 . 6 6 - 4 . 1 9 - 4 , 3 7 - 9 . 2 0 - 9 . 7 3 - 7 . 4 9 - « . 0 7 - 9 . 9 8
- 1 9 . 9 § - i a . 0 3 - 1 S . 4 2 - 1 9 . 3 1 - 2 3 . 0 2 - 2 3 . 3 9 - 2 6 . 4 9 - 2 8 . 8 2 - 3 9 . 9 2 - 4 2 . 4 1 - 4 8 . 7 1
- 2 1 6 . 0 3 - 9 3 4 . 6 1 - 7 9 6 . 7 9
- 1 9 3 3 . 6 0 - 9 7 1 7 . 0 0
HAT. «i»». LOC.
26 27 4 5 11 18 3 2 3 4 12 13 4 2 4 3 39 17 16 38 2 1 4 1 2 2 5 4 1 4
2 99 60 19 4 0 66 37 69 62 61
6 20 46 39
9 1 9
93 4 S
3 3 4 7
3 • 8 2 3 28
7 64 63 51 29 2 9 5 6 2 4 10 9 8 30 9 7 31 49 9 0 52 55 36 19 44
Z-NCRM STRESS
7 8 1 0 . 8 0 1998.AO 1 5 2 1 . 6 0
6 3 6 . 7 3 4 6 1 . 4 1 2 9 9 . 0 9 2 7 1 . 5 9 2 2 8 . 0 1 1 8 9 . 2 8 1 9 4 . 5 8 1 4 4 . 6 7 1 3 4 . 4 1 1 2 3 . 3 4 9 9 . 6 4 8 3 . 1 2 7 6 . 0 6 4 6 . 0 > 4 4 . 7 2 3 6 . 1 6 : 3 . 0 6 2 6 . 4 1 2 3 . 4 9 2 1 . 8 5 2 0 . 9 7 1 8 . 8 9 1 1 . 3 9 1 0 . 3 8
a .62 8 . 5 9 3 . 2 0 7 . 9 9 6 . 7 7 3 . 5 7 2 . 9 7 0 . 9 1 0 . 4 6 0 . 1 4
- 0 . 1 5 - 0 . 9 1 - 2 . 8 3 -3 . -33 - 3 . 0 8 - 4 . 8 4 - 4 . 2 7 - 8 . 5 9 - 8 . 6 9 - 8 . 9 4
- 3 2 . 4 1 - 4 2 . 7 8 - 6 3 . 2 4 - 6 6 . 0 2 - 8 9 . 3 9
- 1 0 1 . 9 1 - 1 3 0 . 6 6 - 1 4 6 . 4 9 - 1 9 4 . 7 0 - 1 7 4 . 2 6 - 1 7 9 . 9 5 - 1 9 1 . 6 3 - 2 0 7 . 3 1 - 2 1 1 . 8 9 - 3 0 1 . 2 6 - 4 2 1 . 9 1
- 1 4 7 1 . 6 0 - 2 1 0 3 . 3 0 - 4 5 2 0 . 4 0
" » T . SHEAR -^iT. LCC. STJ>«SS MUM. LJC
2 7 4 0 6 . 1 9 2 26 26 3 7 7 . 8 8 2 44 34 1 5 6 . 6 7 I M
2 1 4 2 . 5 3 2 zr 3 1 2 7 . 6 9 I 57 6 1 1 5 . 8 6 I 63
11 4 1 . 0 8 1 61 66 6 0 . 4 2 I 59 63 5 1 . 5 6 2 13 62 4 7 . 2 7 I '*l 1 ' 4 1 . 2 3 2 54
7 3 2 . 7 9 I 23 59 2 1 . 9 7 I <.a 58 2 1 . 9 5 I 39 13 1 6 . 8 3 1 49 4 9 1 5 . 2 9 I S3 48 1 4 . 5 1 I *7 14 1 2 . 3 6 I 13 10 3 . 2 3 1 30 15 5 . 3 2 I 21 13 0 . 4 3 2 9 22 O.Ol 2 53 16 - 0 . 6 5 I 15 23 - 1 . 2 4 3 35 41 - 1 . 2 4 3 33 53 - 1 . 1 7 3 37 12 - 3 . 3 3 3 28 21 - 4 . 5 3 I 22 31 - 7 . 6 2 1 16 43 - 9 . 9 9 3 38 38 - 9 . 3 9 3 29 17 - 9 . 4 3 3 29 4 0 - 9 . 6 4 3 43 37 - 9 . 9 1 3 ZZ 2 0 - 9 . 9 2 3 46 4 6 - 1 0 . 2 5 3 51 33 - 1 0 . 2 9 3 17 35 - 1 0 . 3 4 3 12
9 - 1 0 . 5 0 3 ?6 30 - 1 3 . 3 4 I 5 2 4 - 1 3 . 7 7 1 I 28 - 1 4 . 3 3 I 7 51 - 1 5 . 5 7 1 40 25 - 1 9 . 0 1 : 3 56 - 2 0 . 7 5 1 *2 2 9 - 2 1 . 5 0 1 4 39 - 2 6 . 1 3 1 3 42 - 2 6 . 5 6 1 2
8 - 2 7 . 3 5 1 i 54 - 3 5 . 5 6 I 31 4 7 - 3 9 . 4 7 1 24 52 - 4 0 . 0 2 I 14 50 - 5 3 . 4 6 1 60 57 - 6 1 . 3 6 2 36 45 - 7 3 . 9 4 I 62 60 - 1 0 8 . 5 3 I 64 61 - 1 0 9 . 8 2 I 53
5 - 1 2 9 . 2 6 2 52 44 - 1 4 9 . 1 6 I 66 65 - 1 5 4 . 7 5 2 *5 55 - 1 7 1 . 5 0 2 18
4 - 1 8 3 . 2 9 2 55 1 - 2 1 2 . 2 9 2 11
4 4 - 2 2 3 . 7 5 2 19 32 - 2 7 3 . 0 1 2 34 36 - 2 7 3 . 0 4 2 32
^ - 1 1 . : ? 7 8 1 4 . I J 1 5 ? : . 7 0 i : 3 4 . . ' o
7 9 3 . 77 ;>37.fl6 * « 2 . 1 3 «-2'. .*5 3 0 2 . 9 3
2 4 2 . 7 9 1 4 4 . 7 7 1 6 3 . 4 9 1 6 4 . 0 0 1 4 0 . 5 7 1 3 5 . 9 6
iT.ZZ e':.35 7 8 . fcl 7 1 . 2 6 4 6 . OZ 6 3 . 3 9 5 7 . 7 3 5 4 . 2 9 • 3 . 4 6 4 2 . 7 4 3 7 . 2 6 3 5 . 0 0 2 9 . 3 f l 2 9 . 3 3 Zo.li
za.f'i 2 8 . 2 2 2 3 . 0 8 2 7 . 3 4 2 4 . 7 2 2 6 . 0 4 2 5 . 0 4 2 4 . 5 2 2 2 . 0 7 - '0 .7T 2 0 . 7 3 1 7 . - e i.Z.O') 1 1 . 51 1 1 . 3 0 1 1 . 0 4
6 . 7 6 3 . 1 6
1 . 3 3 : . 3 i 0.3 2 0.60 3 . 4 4 0 .24
- 0 . 2 5 - 0 . 6 7 - 1 . 9 2 - 2 . 2 7 - 2 . 5 3 -5 .311
- 4 4 . 6 3 - 1 2 9 . 0 9 - ' = i 5 . 7 3
• 1 4 3 8 . 2 0
• * T . -•u>«. LOC.
*5 11
2 3
• 4 66
6 63 '.2 '.9 ^9 59
7 " i«
32 ^ • » 14 10 4 | 57 *9 23 *4 13 61 *2 « 4 2 4 12 3 9 15 31 16 6 0 22 * 3 17 38 -.0 21
S
' 3 « 6 17 51 35
5 4
33 1
4 7 9
30 29 5 6 2 9 25 52 50 55 •!6 4*
' I • ; . J R IN. •«» r S T R E S S
i ' ;72 , 161<»,
185. 12, 10 I
< 4
2. 1
0 - 0 , - I . - I , - 2 . - 3 ,
- 7 -*, -«
- 1 0 - 1 2 - 1 3 - 1 5 ,
- 17 -21
-n. - 2 5 , -26 - 2 6 , -29 - 3 1 , - 3 9 - 4 * , - 5 1 - 5 2 - 5 5 - C s
- e l , - 6 0 -« , - 8 1 , - • • ' .
- I C 5 , - 1 6 2 - 1 7 0 , - 1 7 6 - 2 0 5 - 2 1 7 - 2 4 1 - 2 9 0 , - 2 9 5 - 3 0 2 - * 2 2 - 4 1 7
- 1 9 5 7 - 2 1 3 7 - 4 5 2 1 -'^750
. ao , 2 9 . 3 2 .ZZ . 5 3 .-.0 .29 . »2 . ^» .50 , 70
•7 f
,C5 , - l ,15
17 l l » l 43 28 60 36 34 56 44 16 62 63 98 91 36 76 il 52 •5 07 22 38 76 47 38 22 7 i 58 09 19 60 72 94 66 52 "56 67 21 38 65 •3 78 36
,42 •n] 50 - 0
, VI
26 27 11 13 22 16
2 15 21 12 43
37
53 17
i 35 33 18
3 7
29 20 46 40 "•i 34 ; 4 99 51 39 s'O 25 «6 62 23 30 41 42 49 24 10
9 31 63 •>«
47 «4 58 50 45 60
2 61 57 b 4 45 52
«> I
55 19 32 3b
Material Information
Material No. 1 2 3
Material Type Glass Aluminum Sealant
143
Y-*«OR« n« STRESS N<J
3 U 7 . 6 0 2 1 1 7 1 . 0 0 2
9 7 4 . 4 0 2 6 1 6 . 1 7 2 1 5 9 . 6 0 2 1 4 4 . 3 9 2 1 4 2 . 7 6 2 1 3 6 . 1 2 2 6 3 . 3 1 2 3 2 . 4 3 I 2 4 . 5 9 2 1 6 . 5 4 I 1 4 . 2 7 1 1 4 . 3 4 I
1 3 . 1 0 1 1 3 . 0 5 1 1 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 . 0 2 3 1 0 . 5 9 1 1 0 . 2 6 1 1 0 . 1 9 I
9 . 1 7 I 7 . 3 9 3 7 . 2 4 3 6 . 5 9 3 9 . 9 3 3 9 . 7 5 1 4 . 9 4 1 4 . 7 9 3 4 . 0 7 I 3 . 8 6 1 3 . 5 8 1 3 . 1 9 3 2 . 3 2 1 1 . 9 9 2 1 . 5 2 1 1 . 4 8 1 1 . 2 8 1 1 . 0 8 1 3 . 9 7 3 0 . 8 6 1 3 . - . 3 3 3 . 2 0 1 3 . 1 6 I 0 . 0 4 2 3 . 0 1 2
- 0 . 0 3 3 - 0 . 3 1 3 - 0 . 4 1 3 - 0 . 6 3 1 - 1 - 2 9 3 - 2 . 1 9 1 - 2 . 3 3 1 - 3 . 0 6 1 - 3 . 7 0 i - 4 . 7 9 I - 6 , 6 2 2 - 7 . 2 8 1 - 9 . 4 8 1
-13.ao 1 - 1 6 . 2 7 I - 2 0 . 7 7 1 - 3 5 . 1 1 1 - 3 8 . 0 1 1
- 2 S 9 . J 5 : - 7 2 5 . 4 8 2
WffbvrfbKCW
T . N . L O C .
4 4 2 6 3 6 2 7 5 2 3 4 3 2 59 18 3 1 1 1 2 1 2 2 4 2 3 0
6 0
4 1
25 6 6 1 4
5 9
1 3
2 0
4 6
5 1
4 3
1 6
9 6
2 9
6 2
6 9
1 9
1 7
6 1
5 4
5
3 9
4 0
6
2 8
4 7
3 8
1
3
9
5 3
3 3
3 5
3 7
4
1 2
2
2 4
4 8
7
9
1 0
6 4
6 3
2 3
5 7
5 8
5 0
4 9
19 4 5
i i K c u e s i
l-HOHM STRESS
3 6 9 7 . 3 0 1 9 7 0 . 7 0
6 3 7 . 0 0 4 3 2 . 7 4 3 1 4 . 3 4 2 0 4 . 3 7 1 7 9 . 0 1 1 7 8 . 4 8 1 4 1 . 5 6 1 0 6 . 4 1 1 3 0 . 9 8
7 2 . 9 9 5 4 . 9 1 4 9 . 0 0 4 4 . 5 6 4 1 . 4 8 4 0 . 9 6 2 8 . 9 7 2 1 . 7 7 2 0 . 3 6 1 7 . 1 3 1 1 . 7 3 1 0 . 9 1 1 0 . 0 4
8 . 5 3 4 . 8 7 3 . 3 1 2 . 8 6 2 . 5 8 2 . 3 4 2 . 1 0 2 . 0 9 2 . 0 9 1 . 9 2 1 . 6 7 1 . 4 9 1 . 4 1 O.Tr-0 . 4 5 0 . 2 0 0 . 1 4
- 0 . 2 2 - 0 . 2 7 - 0 . 4 6 - 0 . 4 6 - 0 . 6 7 - 2 . 9 6
- 1 0 . 9 3 - 1 1 . 2 2 - 1 1 . 5 9 - 1 2 . 0 9 - 2 0 . 5 2 - 3 1 . 6 6 - 4 4 . 4 0 - 5 1 . 7 0 - 5 6 . 4 9 - 9 7 . 9 4 - 7 3 . 6 0
- 1 0 2 . 7 7 - 1 3 1 . 6 8 - 1 3 8 . 0 7 - 1 6 0 . 8 8 - 2 1 3 . 0 0 - 2 4 7 . 0 6 - 2 8 4 . 2 4 - 7 5 4 . 3 4
kEHARI
H A T .
mm.
2 2 2 1 1 I 1 2 1 1 1
1 I
2
1 1
1 9
2 2
1
2
Q - I I (
L O C .
3 6 2 7 4 4 6 6 6 3 62
1 2 6
4 5
5 9 3
13 16 5 5
2 1
5 8
2 4 4 9 4 9
1 1
5 2
1 0
3 0
4 8
2 9
2 0
4 6
5 1
4 3
2 9
4 2
5 3
5 6 4 1
4 7
1 7
3 9
2 8
3 5
3 3
9
• 0
3 3
3 7
1 2
5 0
5 7
3 1
5 4
1 8
1 9
2 3
2 2
1 5
1 4
6 0
7
6
3
6 1
2
6 4
3 2
6 5
3 4
spi iT spscrs 1 - I T H i ; 1
IMEAR >««T. STRESS MUM. L : C .
1 6 4 . 5 3 1 6 0 . 0 0 1 3 2 . 7 2 1 2 6 . 1 1
3 9 . 4 7 8 4 . 9 0 6 9 . 9 9 6 6 . 4 4
4 5 . 0 2 4 0 . 3 3 39. -"S 3 8 . 4 0 3 7 . 5 7 3 5 . 2 9 3 3 . 6 6 3 1 . 5 9 2 1 . 4 3 1 5 . 0 2 1 1 . 7 3 1 0 . 7 6
. 9 . 7 4 3 . 9 6 8 . 3 0 8 . 1 5 7 . 9 6 7 . 3 2 7 . 4 3 6 . 9 1 2 . 9 5 1 . 3 9 1 . 8 7 1 . 6 1 1 . 5 9 1 . 5 7 1 . 5 0 1 . 3 1 1 . 3 0 1 . 3 0 1 . 2 9 0 . 0 2 0 . 3 7 0 . 3 7 0 . 8 4 3 . 5 0 0 . 3 6 0 . 1 4 0 . 0 3 0 . 0 2 3 . 0 1
- 0 . 9 3 1 - 0 . 9 7 ; - 1 . 0 4 I - 3 . 3 9
- 1 6 . 3 6 1 - 2 1 . 8 4 1 - 2 4 . 2 1 1 - 3 0 . 5 6 ] - 3 0 . 9 9 2 - 4 4 . 5 9 1 - 6 3 . 9 8 1 - 7 1 . 5 1 2 - 9 9 . 7 2 :
- 1 0 0 . 3 5 I - 1 0 9 . 9 7 I - 1 3 9 . 5 8 I - 2 0 6 . 3 6 2
1 ^5 2 ^7 I 57 1 61 1 01 2 - 5 1 59 2 4 4
Z ' 4 23
i 32 2 26
30 I 41 L 13 I 39 : 10 I ? i
L 5 L 50 I I I 3 L 49
1 5
I 54 L 48 L 47 3 2 9 I 22 1 51 » 56 ) 46 3 43 J 25 1 12 J 23 i 17 » 2?
1 a
,> >
I 16 > 33 ! 9 ) 37 I 35
5 3
6
1 8
i 3 1
2 4
4 0
1 4
4 2
19
6 0
6 2
55
1 1
0 ^
53 66 36
' S I " i L A N T " _ :
• A X . » » ; - j . 4 » T ,
3 7 1 3 . C O 2 3 1 3 9 . iO 2 1 9 8 9 . » : 1 1 7 2 . 4 0 2
- 7 4 . 1 7 I 3 5 7 . 6 6 1 22 3 . l o I 1 7 9 . 4 0 1 1 ' 5 . ; 5 2 1 * 3 . « 3 z . 4 ' . . 5 : r l - o . 19 2 1 . ; . ! s, i I •". '5. C i 12 4 . 3 ) I 1 1 ' ' . 14 I l l j . 6 6 7 l ' ' 7 . 3 1 I
7 8 . 4 8 1 7 3 . 0 4 1 7 0 . 7 7 I » 3 . 3 2 2 4 9 . 0 0 I 4 6 . 8 5 4 6 . 2 4 I 4 6 . 1 1 I 4 0 . 3 3 1 3 9 . 2 1 I 3 6 . 1 0 I 3 4 . 5 4 3 3 . 5 6 1 3 2 , 7 0 1 3 0 . 1 2 2 2 2 . 8 1 1 2 2 . 5 6 2 2 . 3 6 1 1 9 . 5 5 2 1 8 . 1 2 1 1 7 . 6 2 I 1 4 . 3 3 1 l l - ' " = 1 1 . , - " ^ 3
' . 77 ? - ' . 7 4 •> T. 15 3 6 . 4 7 1 5 . 7 6 5 . 6 1 J 5 . 2 4 2 4 . 6 7 1 4 . 1 4 ; 3 . 9 4 3 2 . 3 0 : 1 . 6 7 •> 1 . 0 9 1 0 . 9 4 3 3 . 4 o I 1.*Z 3 " ' .3 ' i 3 0 . 2 0 3 - ' . 1 0 2
- O . - O 3 - 0 . 6 3 I - 2 . 3 9 I - 2 . 1 9
- 1 7 . 3 1 2
iJtJS
L C C .
36 44 2 7
••4 ^ t s 1
6 2 I
5 « ••z •«7 34
4 * 9 ^ 8 5 7
11 5
45 J
1 3
1 8
1 6 3 0
6 1
2 1
4 1
4 2 2 4
6 0
6 b 3 1
4 5 4 9
3 9
4 0
1 9
1 -
2 3
2 2
4 9
2 5
2 0 • a 5 1 •»3 7 9 5 6
5 4
1 5
4 7
I T
5 3
2 8 K
3 8
3
1 3
s2 3 5
9
- •7
5 0
7 2
1 9
- ' ! ^<. " ' IN Sf > • - : : :
< ;58 .7 - ' 6 3 5 . 2 3
i r ' . : 6 1 1 . 9 1
= . -3
2 . »3 2 . 3 5 ' . C 2 I . 1 0 1 . 2 3 ' • • »
1 . 7 7 2 . J 3
1 . 0 1 - T . 1 9 - ' . 4 : 5 - - I . 2 9 - 0 . 3 1 - 3 . 32 - " . . 7 -? . 6 4 - ^ . ?9 - I . 19 - I . 7 9 - 2 . 31 - 4 . 8 4 - 6 . 2 5 - 7 . C 4 - 0 . 4 0
- 1 1 . 4 9 - 1 2 . 1 0 - 1 4 . 55 - i 4 . < ; 7 - 1 5 . 2 4 - 2 ^ . 3 0 - 2 1 - 3 5 - 2 3 . 0 9 - ' 1 . 71 -:•' .z^ -2-.it - 31 . J4 - 3 7 . , 3 - 3 - 5 . : 5 -44 , . fc6 - 52 . 79 - 5 2 . 3 0 - 6 3 . 0 8 - 4 * . 3 4 - e « - ? 3 - 7 5 - 2 2 - 7 9 . „
- 1 0 2 . 7 7 - 1 0 4 . 12 - 1 3 2 . 1 5 - 1 4 6 . 3 4 - 1 6 0 . 8 9 - 1 3 I . < 0 - 2 5 0 . i\ - 2 5 3 . 3 4 - i 7-1.15 - ' 5 6 . 3 7 - 7 3 5 . X - 7 5 6 . 15
-3
5 53 1
* 4
35
3^ 52 . 7 12
^ 4s 13 i. * 71 .3 a2 5,
39 40
» ' 30 41
66 5 J 40 22 15 S3 23 14
5i 3
57 2
61 32 - X
19 :; .5 34
Material Information
Material No.
1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant
i
144
I - - . ( . . - : : -.f'-.-.i.-) .^Si ScALA.'^r ••OOUUIS
T-.«C3i<« lAl . S T P ( C S 3 ~ M .
3 6 6 J - 9 C X 2 1 9 1 - 7 C Z 2 0 i i 3 . J C w 1755."^O
2 ^ 1 . 6 1 Z 2 9 1 . 6 0 2
5 4 . 1 6 3 4< l .a5 Z 3 9 . 3 2 1 3 2 . 5 1 1 2 9 . 6 2 I 2 8 . 7 2 3 1 6 - 4 0 I 1 4 . 6 5 1 4 . J 7 3 1 3 . s 3 1 1 2 . 5 1 1 1 1 . 4 7 1 0 - 8 5 I 1 0 . 3 5 1 1 3 - 0 7 1
7 . 7 5 I 8 . 4 1 3 7 . 2 9 3 6 . 4 7 I S . 1 3 I 4 . 6 7 1 3 . 6 4 1 3 . 4 6 1 i . 0 3 1 3 . 0 3 i 2 . 8 4 I 2 - 5 9 3 2 - 5 £ 1 3 - 9 6 J 0 - 3 7 1 3 . 2 7 J
- 0 . 3 7 3 - 2 . 2 5 3 - 2 - 5 1 3 - 2 . 5 7 3 - 2 . 6 5 : - 4 . 2 9 3 - 4 - 3 4 I - 5 . 3 3 I - 9 . 4 5 I - 6 . 7 7 1 - 7 . o 0 1 - 8 . 2 5 1
- 1 0 . » 3 3 - 2 1 . 3 8 I - 2 6 . J 7 i - . 1 . 6 3 I - 4 4 . ^ 6 1 - 4 6 . 1 6 1 - 6 8 . 4 0 1 - 7 8 . 3 5 I
- 3 3 9 . 9 4 2 - 3 4 2 . 3 9 2 - 5 6 1 . 5 2 2 - 3 9 0 . 0 5 2
- 2 1 4 1 . 9 0 2 - 2 2 7 8 . 3 0 Z - 2 4 9 9 . 1 0 X - 7 1 6 6 . 5 0 2 - 7 - 9 O d . 2 0 Z
35
• 3
.. 1 J •J i
•i
1 ^ 1 9
1 3 2 1 I Q
1 7 15
i f
2,4 1
2 .' 5 0 4 t
3 1 - l ; 4 j
2 5
3 J
I 4 0
o S b l
4
'>2 £» 5
3 7
6 6 4 i
3 J 5
3 3
4 0 2 0
;a ^ 3 5 1
1
4 3 4 7
7 b 3
s 4 56 58 57 4-> 5 3 2 4 30 31 32 34 10 27 cb I o 5 2 4 4 i :
: - N w - -4 7 . ^ 4 ^ . .
4 / 7 , . i . :
i : » i i - ' ' - "• lOd 1.4-0 2 l - > r . l , ;
:>il.l'> I -.7-^.3 1 1 2 7 2 . * o 1 1 5 5 . 3 5 :. I 3 a . 7 3 1 1 3 1 . C J 1 1.' 1 . a J 1
7 2 . : - I 5 i . i 7 : 5 5 . ; . 2 3 : . - ' I 4 7 . 0 7 I 3 : . 2 7 I 5 ; . J'/ 1 2 6 . 2 2 I ^r .2< . J 2 0 . 3 5 1 I t . - 4 1 1 2 . 2 9 1 1 3 . J 3 3 1 2 . 4 3 1 i : . j 9 I
7 . 0 J J 5 . 4 1 3 4 . 3 4 J 2 . 7 1 : 3 . 4 i 1 C.I-) j 2 . 1 3 3
- 0 . 3 J i - 1 . 3 0 ; - 1 . 3 7 ; - l . o O 3 - 2 . 3 6 3 - 5 . 0 5 : - 9 . i 4 - T . 6 0
- l i . 5 l - 2 2 - 3 d - 2 4 . 6 4 - 2 6 . 2 7 - 3 1 . 7 3 - 3 4 . 9 2 - 4 1 . J c - 5 ' ; . 3 9 - o 3 . 0 4 - 9 5 . 1 3 - 9 9 . 1 7
- 1 0 6 . 1 2 - 1 2 1 . 5 1 - i d 2 . 1 7 - 2 5 3 . 3 7 - 2 9 1 . 4 1 - 2 9 7 . 3 6 - 4 * 6 . 5 7 - • J O S . 9 5
- 1 3 0 1 - 2 0 - 1 3 8 0 . 3 0 - 2 1 7 9 . e o - i 3 5 7 - 7 0 - 5 0 4 4 . i J - 8 3 1 3 . 1 0
i l .
3 4
J *
3 3 •t 1
4
^ r -J s. 1 -1 a
2 1 7
J .
- 5 1
5 ^ 4 ' ,
3 » • • J
12 3i.
<45 4 1 17
a 2 2 3
3 J .10 j 7
2 5 4v(
33 4 i
3 5 2 3
4 6 - 9
5i .
1 56 3 3
L 39 L JJ
17
i>4
6 0 4 2
I 14 1 5
1 -.7 1 i l l I 50 1 60 I 57 1 5 2 32 2 19 2 13 I t 1 I 2 ^6 2 27 2 - 4 2 IX 2 53 2 IJ Z 3o
SncAP •--*
5 c 4 . 3 , 2 , i i . G 6 i 2 3 7 . 1 3 2 1 5 1 . 5 3 1 1 1 7 . 3 7 1 i O t . 4 2 I I . 2 . 7J 2
7 2 . 3 3 I 'S7.?'. 2 3 2 . ">" 1 5 2 . 7 7 1 r 1 .25 1 ' " . 1 0 1 2 1 . 4 3 I - l . J T I . 7 . 3 5 I i : . i 7 1
5 .0- . I t . J 4 I 5 . I d 1 : . 3 7 1
- 0 . 1 3 3 - C . 3 0 3 - 1 . 3 3 3 - 1 . 4 1 1 - 2 . 0 7 2 - 3 . 1 0 I - 3 . 1 5 3 - 3 . 5 4 J - 3 . 7 6 3 - 4 . 4 5 3 - 4 - 7 6 ]
- 1 1 . 3 4 j - : 6 - i a - 1 7 . 1 9 : - 1 7 . 2 4 3 - 1 7 . 3 4 - 1 7 . 3 3 3 - 1 3 . 7 2 - 1 8 . 7 6 - 1 9 . 9 6 - 2 3 . 5 9 - 2 4 . 0 5 - 2 7 . 0 8 - 3 0 . 9 1 - 3 2 . 3 1 - 3 2 . 3 6 - 3 2 . 6 0 - 3 4 . 6 0 - 4 3 . 3 4 - 6 1 . 4 4 - 9 C - a 3
- 1 0 2 . 9 1 - 1 1 4 . 5 0 - 1 1 8 . 4 4 - 1 4 2 . 8 7 - 1 5 C . 5 7 - 1 9 4 . 0 9 - 1 5 9 . 3 9 - 2 1 1 . 2 7 - 2 1 9 . 3 1 - 3 0 C . 6 4 - 3 0 C . 6 6 - 3 4 9 . 5 8 - 3 5 1 . 5 1 - 3 6 9 . 7 6
T .
•*. . - c .
3o 34.
3.< 57
63 55
0 1 ••4
J"* 2 3 i l I J 21 : 9
22 4 ^ 15 l a
1.9
5 3 35 33 23 4 7
3 7 2 4
12 2 9
1 7 2 u 2 5 3 6 4 3 5o
1 43 \ 51
•«> L 7 L 5
1
L )ti 1 3 1 4 1 . 2 1 2 1 3 L a I 31 I 14 I 60 1 62 2 18 1 a4 1 58 2 10 2 32 2 34 1 60 2 26 2 19 2 53 2 0 2 27 2 52 2 -.5
••AX. P R I h . •* SrsESS Nl
3 7 7 9 . 0 0 c 3 6 6 2 . 5 0 2 2 2 5 3 . 9 0 2 2 C J 1 . 4 0 2 17 .^1 .13 2 1 7 o l . l O 2 0 9 4 . 7 6 1 4 d 0 . 7 1 1 1 2 5 . 3 0 2 2 7 6 . 3 7 1 2 0 1 . 3 9 2 1 6 4 . 0 7 2 . 6 2 . 4 5 149.6'» 1 1 4 3 . d 2 1 1 3 5 . 9 5 1 1 3 2 . 3 9 1 1 0 7 . 7 9 1
-53 .35 1 9 8 . 3 0 1 3 8 . 7 0 1 7 8 . 6 8 1 7 6 . 4 5 I 6 6 . 8 4 1 5 8 . 3 8 1 5 8 . 2 6 1 5 6 . 8 7 1 5 4 . 4 9 3 5 2 . 9 6 1 5 0 . 1 5 1 4 1 . 9 3 1 3 8 . 7 1 1 3 7 . 3 9 I 3 1 . 7 3 1 2 9 . 6 0 I 2 9 . 5 7 3 2 7 . 1 0 1 2 3 . 9 3 1 2 0 . 5 8 1 1 9 . 9 5 1 1 3 . 5 2 3 1 7 . 9 7 1 7 . 3 1 3 1 6 . 1 2 1 5 . 5 8 1 4 . 0 5 : 1 1 . 3 7
9 . 6 5 7 . 7 6 6 . 0 7 5 . 9 6 5 . 6 1 1 . 4 0 0 . 7 6 3 . 3 0
- 0 . 4 2 - 6 . 4 2 - 9 . 1 3
- 4 4 . 2 6 - 9 1 . 8 1
- 5 9 6 . 9 7 - 6 9 0 . 0 8 - 7 7 7 . 2 5
- 1 3 7 9 . 7 0 - 2 1 2 0 . 8 0 - 2 2 5 1 . 9 0
» I . j n . LOC-
54 5 5
4 5 3 4
1 8 9
2 3
5 3 6
5 2 1 9
6 5 6 6 1 3 5 8 1 6
2 1 6 4
6 3 6 2 5 9
7
a 5 7 2 4
2 3 1 2 4 1
6 1 1 4 4 9
6 0 3 1 4 8 1 7 4 2 3 9
4 0 2 2 3 8
1 5
1 4 3 1 2 0 \ 4 a 1 51 3 25 3 5 6 I 1 3 3 7 I 4 1 5 3 29 3 33 3 39 3 2 8 1 4 7 1 30 1 90 2 3 2 2 10 2 27 2 26 2 4 4 2 11 2 3 6
MIN. PRIN. STRESS
2 0 7 4 . 6 0 I S 7 9 . 8 0
2 3 0 . 0 9 3 2 . 9 3 2 8 . 8 3 2 6 . 4 0 2 4 . 0 1 U . 1 8 1 2 . 1 3 4 . 3 7 1 . 3 6 J . 75
- 0 . 8 6 - 0 . 9 0 - 3 . 9 4 - 3 . - ^ - 1 - 5 9 - 5 . 9 3 - 9 . 7 1 - 6 . 2 9 - 8 . 7 1
- 1 0 . 9 8 - U . 8 4 - 1 3 - 0 0 - 1 6 . 6 8 - 1 9 . 2 0 - 2 0 . 6 « - 0 . 2 T - 2 9 . 1 4 - 2 9 . 8 1 - 3 0 . 3 2 - 3 0 . 3 2 - 4 2 . 0 8 - 4 2 . 6 6 - 4 4 . 2 9 - 4 7 . 9 7 - 4 9 . 4 3 - 9 9 . 4 3 - 4 1 . 8 0 - 7 3 . 2 3 - 7 7 . 7 8
-as.u - 9 9 . 2 3 - 1 0 9 . 5 5 - 110 . 76 - 1 1 4 . 3 4 - 1 2 4 . 2 8 - 1 2 6 . 8 3 - 1 3 1 . 2 6 - 1 4 1 . 7 3 - 1 7 2 . 3 8 - 1 9 0 . 9 7 - 2 8 6 . 9 9 - 2 8 9 . 8 6 - 3 5 3 . 0 2 - 3 6 8 . 3 9 - 4 3 1 . 3 0 - 4 4 7 . 3 6
- 1 3 0 1 . 2 0 - 2 1 7 4 . 6 0 - 2 3 9 1 . 4 0 - 2 3 0 9 . 6 0 - 5 0 4 8 . 6 0 - 7 1 6 7 . 3 0 - 7 9 6 7 . 2 0 - 8 8 9 9 . 9 0
KAT.
2 2
2 1 1
1 3 3 1 3
3 3 1
3 3
3 3
; 3
2 I 1 1 1 3 3 3 I 3 1
1 1 1 I
1 1 1 1
I I 1
1 1 I I
1 I 1
1 1 1 1 2 I 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
toe 5 4
5 9 9
1 3
1 6
2 1 1 2 1 7
2
2 0 3 7
2 5 6
3 9 3 3 2 9 3 8
3 2 9
4 5 4 8
7 4 0
3 4 ) 4 6 9 1 3 9
5 6 4 1
2 2 5 9 4 9 1 9
2 4 4 2
2 3 4 7
1 4 6 2 3 0 5 0 3 1 6 1 5 8
6 3 5
6 0
6 4 6 9 6 6 97 18
34 19 32
1 2 7 26 53 52 10 4 4 11 36
Material Information
Material No. 1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant
145
OROEREO STRESSES SCENARIO-I I (SCLIO SPACERI M I T H 150 " S I SEALA.IT <«0ULUS
T-NORM l A T . STRESS mjN.
1 4 7 8 . 4 0 2 1 4 1 3 . 9 0 2
7 8 6 . 4 0 2 6 3 0 . 4 2 2 4 6 3 . 1 8 2 3 9 * . 2 7 2 a a . 9 3 2 U 0 . 7 1 2 2 1 0 . 9 6 2 2 1 0 . 9 3 2 1 7 8 . 7 0 2 1 0 3 . 8 3 2
7 3 . 9 1 I 3 2 . 1 0 3 3 1 . 1 6 I 2 1 . 7 6 1 2 1 . 3 9 3 2 0 . 2 4 3 2 0 . 2 0 I 1 7 . 9 2 1 1 6 . 9 3 1 1 4 . 4 4 1 1 4 . 2 1 1 1 4 . 0 6 3 1 3 . 5 3 3 1 1 . 4 * 1 1 0 . 9 1 1 1 0 . 4 9 1
9 . 1 9 1 8 . 9 3 1 8 . 1 8 1 8 . 0 1 1 7 . 7 2 3 7 . 3 9 3 7 . 1 6 1 3 . 9 9 1 3 . 6 4 1 1 . 7 4 3 1 . 6 2 1 1 . 0 9 1 0 . 5 8 1
- 0 . 0 8 1 - 0 . 1 9 1 - 0 . 2 9 3 - 9 . 3 7 3 - 0 . 3 8 3 - 0 . 5 1 I - 0 . 9 1 1 - 0 . 9 6 3 - 0 . 5 7 3 - 0 . 7 6 3 - 1 . 3 0 I - 1 . 4 7 I - 1 . 7 3 1 - 1 . 8 3 I - 1 . 9 4 1 - 2 . 0 3 I - 4 . 6 7 1 - 4 . 9 6 I - 7 . 7 2 1
- 1 0 . 8 2 I - 1 7 . 7 0 1 - 7 7 . 4 1 2
- 3 2 7 . 6 2 2 - 4 3 0 . 3 0 2
- 1 9 3 6 . 1 0 2
L K .
V4 11 3 6 10 5 2 2 7 32 3 6 5 3
9 5 4 19 3 1 5 6 3 0 5 0 91 12 1 6 66 13 1 4 4 2 17 4 6 2 2 4 9 4 1 6 0 19 2 1 2 6 2 0 4 3 9 7 6 4
8 2 5
6 4 0 3 9
2 9 9 2 8 3 9 3 3
3 4 7 2 9 3 8 3 7 6 2
I 6 9
4 6 3
9 7
61 4 8 9 8 2 3 26 18 4 5 55
l-HOtm 9 AT. STRESS NUM.
2 4 7 3 - 8 0 2 1 9 6 7 . 4 0 2 1 0 8 9 . 9 0 1
7 9 0 . 8 1 I 9 0 2 . 9 7 1 4 8 2 . 3 3 2 2 8 9 . 3 7 2 2 3 2 . 9 9 2 2 2 2 . 3 0 I 2 1 2 . 8 8 2 1 4 9 . 3 6 1 1 3 8 . 3 9 1 3 2 . 3 4 I 1 3 0 . 1 6 I 1 2 2 . 4 1 1 1 0 8 . 2 9 1
8 3 . 3 6 I 6 2 . 5 8 1 5 3 . 1 8 1 4 4 . 0 2 2 4 3 . 4 1 2 2 7 . 3 7 1 2 6 . 0 9 I 2 1 . 8 9 2 1 9 . 1 3 2 1 4 . 1 9 3
9 . 2 6 3 9 . 0 2 3 7 . 2 8 1 7 . 2 8 1 6 . 3 2 3 6 . 2 9 1 9 . 7 3 3 3 . 4 7 3 3 . 0 1 3 2 . 1 9 1 0 . 7 0 3 0 . 2 1 3 0 . 1 3 1
- 0 . 0 1 3 - 0 . 0 9 3 - 0 . 2 3 3 - 0 . 7 6 1 - 1 . 1 5 3 - 1 . 2 9 1 - 1 . 9 2 3 - 7 . 9 2 2
- 2 9 . 4 3 1 - 2 6 . 9 0 1 - 3 0 . 6 7 2 - 6 8 . 1 1 - 9 7 . 8 8 1
- 1 2 2 . 3 0 I - 1 3 9 . 9 9 1 - 1 3 6 . 9 9 1 - 1 3 8 . 1 1 I - 1 3 8 . 7 6 1 - 1 3 9 . 4 0 1 - 1 6 9 . 9 6 1 - 4 2 6 . 9 8 1 - 4 7 2 . 8 6 2 - 4 9 1 . 9 8 2 - 4 9 9 . 9 1 2 - 5 9 0 . 5 2 2 - 6 7 9 . 9 7 1 - 9 2 8 . 9 8 I
LOC.
3 6 10 66 63 62 2 7 11 53 59 4 4
I 4 5 3
13 16 21 58 2 4 18 19 30 4 9 2 6 32 56 91 12 4 8 4 7 17 42 4 6 20 4 3 3 9 2 9 35 41 28 33 29 40 3 7 50 38 4 9 57 31 52 23 22 19 14
2 3 6 7
6 0 61 59
? 94 34 64 69
SHEAR i T ' E S S
2 2 9 . 6 7 1 3 1 . 3 2 1 0 0 . 9 0
8 9 . 9 0 6 4 . 2 3 5 9 . 0 1 5 2 . 7 3 5 2 . 5 7 5 2 . 5 6 5 0 . 8 1 4 9 . 3 0 4 4 . 2 1 4 2 . 7 6 4 2 . 1 9 4 2 . 1 2 4 1 . 4 2 3 9 . 5 6 3 7 . 4 7 3 3 . 4 4 3 3 - 0 9 3 1 . 3 1 2 7 - 4 4 2 9 . 8 9 2 3 . 1 8 2 1 . 3 1 1 9 . 2 4 1 9 . 2 4 1 7 . 2 9 1 2 . 8 3 1 1 . 3 2 1 0 . 5 8 1 0 . 2 1
9 . 2 1 5 . 8 2 4 . 5 0 4 . 1 3 3 . 7 7 3 . 6 7 3 . 4 4 3 . 2 9 2 . 6 7 2 . 4 5 1 .68 1 .47 0 . 4 8 0 . 4 6 0 . 4 4 0 .4O 0 . 3 7 0 . 0 7
- 0 . 0 2 - 0 . 0 9 - 0 . 0 6 - 3 . 3 9 - 3 . 5 9 - 9 . 2 9 - 7 - 3 1 - 8 - 9 1
- 1 1 . 2 8 - 1 4 . 1 3 - 2 2 . 4 6 - 2 9 . 8 4 - 3 0 . 7 4 - 9 1 . 6 3
- 1 7 6 . 5 2 - 3 2 8 . 4 0
HAT. NUn.
2 2 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 2 I I 2 2 1 I 2 1 1 I I 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 1. 1 1 I I 3 i
3 3 1 3 1 I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 I I I 2 1 2
1 t
2 2 2
4 4
45 54 66 64 62 13 53
a 30 27 26 60 23 34 32 13 57 52 41 59 49 21 31 39 61 58 19 22 47 16 63
7 9 1 3
43 46 51 56 50 38 24 48 17 12 20 25 37 33 28 35 29
4
6 3
19 65 11 40 14 42 13 36 55
<UX. PRIN. >TC»SSS
2 4 9 2 . 0 0 1 0 7 2 . 4 0 1 5 1 8 . 8 0 1 4 1 4 . 1 3 1 0 9 2 . 7 0
• " ' 0 . 9 4 5 0 8 . 9 1 . 9 9 . 3 2 4 6 5 . 4 3 2 7 5 . 4 9 2 2 6 . 3 2 2 1 9 . 4 9 2 1 4 . 4 4 2 1 3 . 3 3 1 9 3 . 3 0 1 4 5 . 4 9 1 3 8 . ' . 3 1 3 5 . 5 6 1 3 2 . 7 9 1 3 0 . 5 8 1 0 9 . 5 0 1 0 5 . 1 1
91 .3-5 8 0 . 2 0 7 9 . 9 9 6 7 . 3 1 5 3 . 2 5 5 1 . 3 6 4 6 . 9 " 4 1 . 2 3 3 8 . 7 8 3 8 . 7 2 3 2 . 6 8 3 1 . 7 3 2 9 . 5 3 2 2 . 6 8 2 2 . 6 3 2 2 - 2 6 2 2 . 0 7 2 0 . 2 6 1 9 . 7 9 1 9 . 8 7 1 5 . 3 6 1 4 . 9 9 1 4 . 0 9 1 2 . ' ' 4 1 1 . 1 '
•5 , -3 3 . 5 4 7 . 7 7 7 . 4 3 6 . 2 4 I . a a 1 . 8 2 1 . 4 5 0 . 2 2 0 . 0 1
- 0 . 0 0 - 0 . 0 3 - 0 . 2 2 - 0 . 3 9 - 0 . 5 4 - 1 . 5 9 - 4 . 0 9 - 4 . 1 7
- 3 7 9 . 6 0
8 AT a
«UM. LOC.
2 36 2 10 2 4 4 2 11 I 66 I 6 3 I 62 2 ?7 2 52 2 53 I 59 2 32 ? 9 2 34 2 54 1 1 I , I 13 I 5 I 9 1 16 2 19 1 21 1 30 I 31 1 58 1 ? 4 2 18 I 4 9 I 42 I 41 2 26 3 56
5 7 2 4 5 I 39 I 4C 3 51 t ^0 3 12 1 14 1 60 I »7 3 - 6 3 17 I 22 I 15 1 a , 3 43 3 20 1 4 8 1 23 3 25 I 6 •» 38 3 19 ^ 2 3 28 3 33 3 29 1 3 3 37 1 65 I 61 1 7 2 »5
" I - . . >3 ; • „ 4 » T .
STRESS *»LH.
7 4 C . 1 3 2 6 2 5 . 4 5 2 3 3 9 . 2 7 2 2 99 . 19 2 172 . 49 2 1 6 7 . 9 9
4 2 . 1 2 2 18 . 9 4 I 1 3 . 5 6 3 11 .C6 1 1 0 . 5 7 2
3.JO 3 8 . "'4 3 7 . 9 5 1 6 . 2 9 3 ' • . 2 7 •< 3 . 42 > 3 . 3 8 I 3 . 2 2 I 0 . d4 3 0 . 5 6 3 C . 1 5 I
- 0 . 2 9 3 - 0 . 3 7 3 - 0 . 3 9 3 - 0 . 5 7 3 - 1 . 3 7 3 - 1 . 5 5 I - 1 . 6 1 I - 1 . 9 1 1 - 2 . 0 7 1 - 2 . 2 9 I - 3 . 5 3 3 - 4 . 4 7 1 - 7 . 2 3 1 - 7 . 3 6 I - f . 5 9 i - 0 . 9 9 I
- 1 9 . 5 5 1 - 1 9 . 9 6 I - 2 0 . 7 7 I - 2 1 . 4 7 I - 2 2 . 3 4 1 - 29 . 1 4 1 - 3 1 . y * - 3 2 . 9 2 2 - 5 0 . 0 3 1 - 9 2 . :5 I - 9 4 . 2 4 2 - 9 6 . 3 6 1
- 1 2 4 . 5 4 I - 1 3 7 . 0 5 I - 1 3 8 . 2 3 I - 1 3 8 - 9 6 I - 1 J 9 . 9 C I - 1 4 0 . 0 0 I - I Tr . ft* - 3 3 4 . 9 6 2 - 4 2 7 . 8 6 - 4 6 7 . , 0 2 - 4 9 5 . 3 0 2 - 5 1 4 . - 9 2 - 5 5 2 . 3 4 : - 6 8 5 . 5« 1 - • 5 2 8 , 7 1 1
- 1 6 2 O . - 0 2
sOC.
3a 10 27 1 '
«»,« 53 1-5 l o 56 6 6
32 12 51 2 -17 4 6
20 13
3
4 i 25 21 23 !5 33 29 37 50
1 4
4 3 5
38 59 62 48 . 7 4 4
5^ 3"! 42 30 , 3 ••I 3 1 52 57 ' 3 26 22 15
2 3 6 7
14 60 IS a l . 5
3
5'. 34 64 a5 55
Material Information
Material No.
1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant
146
Y-««ORN MA STRESS NJ
2 2 4 9 . 6 0 2 2 2 0 0 . 6 0 2
7 9 1 . 3 3 2 7 0 7 - 3 4 2 4 9 4 . 4 6 2 1 6 4 . 9 6 2
4 0 . 3 9 1 3 6 . 4 6 1 3 3 . 0 3 1 2 9 . 2 1 1 2 9 . 6 8 1 2 2 . 3 8 1 2 0 . 8 7 2 1 9 . 4 9 2 1 9 . 5 9 1 1 1 . 3 3 I 1 1 . 3 4 1
7 . o 9 1 7 . 5 4 i 7 . 4 3 1 5 . 9 9 1 5 . 5 7 I 3 . 9 5 1 1 . 6 3 3 1 . 4 7 0 . 6 8 1 3 . 6 3 9 . 9 0 0 . 3 9
- 0 . 3 8 - 0 . 5 9 - 2 . 0 9 - 2 . 7 1 - 2 . 7 9 - 3 . 5 7 - 3 . 9 6 - 4 . 4 8 - 9 . 1 0 - 6 . 0 6 - 6 . 2 5 - 8 . 1 1 - 8 . 7 9 - 8 . 8 8 - 9 . 3 8
- 1 1 . 6 1 - 1 3 . 3 9 - 1 7 . 3 4 - 1 8 . 1 4 - 2 2 . 0 9 - 2 4 . 9 8 - 2 7 . 6 7 - 3 0 . 7 9 - i O . 8 4 - 3 2 . 7 2 - 3 9 . 3 9 - 3 7 . 8 0 - 4 0 . 9 6 - 4 8 . 5 2 - 9 9 . 9 3 - 9 5 . 7 7
- 2 1 7 . 5 0 - 2 1 7 . 5 1 - 4 9 7 . 3 0 - 6 6 7 . 7 2 - 9 0 0 . 3 8
- 2 4 9 0 . 7 0
JRDERED
f.
N . L O C .
1 1
4 4
2 6
9 2
3 6
2 7
2 3
9 8
2 4
9 7
4 8
4 7
3 4
3 2
4 9
7
9 0
2
1
4
9
6 1
6 2
2 9
1 2 8 6 9
1 3 3 I 6 3 ) 3 9 » 3 7 I 3 L 6 4 ) 3 8 L 3 0 I 6 > 2 9 L 4 0 3 4 3 ) 4 6 1 3 9 1 6 6 3 5 1 I 9 3 2 0 3 5 6 1 5 9 1 6 0 3 1 7 1 15 1 4 1 I 4 2 1 2 2 3 12 1 2 1 I 13 I 1 6 1 14 2 1 9 1 3 1 2 1 0 2 53 2 9 2 18 2 4 9 2 5 4 2 5 9
STRESSES SCEN
Z - N C R N 9 STRESS «1U
2 3 1 3 . 0 0 2 8 8 9 . 8 8 2 7 7 6 . 7 7 2 7 1 1 . 9 8 1 6 9 2 . 2 3 2 5 8 8 . 9 6 1 5 8 7 . 4 9 I 4 9 1 . 0 1 2 4 6 9 . 0 0 I 4 3 9 . 4 5 I 3 4 6 . 1 9 1 2 9 6 . 4 4 I 2 7 0 . 4 9 2 2 6 7 . 7 8 I 2 2 0 . 5 4 1 1 9 4 . 8 8 2 1 5 9 . 9 6 I 1 5 8 . 8 8 1
9 0 . 6 6 1 9 7 . 4 3 2 3 9 . 5 3 J 7 8 . 3 3 t 7 4 . 9 2 2 4 8 . 2 0 1 2 6 . 2 1 2 4 . 0 9 1 0 . 9 6 1
2 . 3 2 1 . 0 6 : 0 . 6 0 0 . 1 6
- 0 . 0 9 - 0 . 7 9 - 1 . 1 0 - 1 . 4 6 - 1 . 5 5 - 1 . 6 8 - 1 - 7 6 - 2 . 8 7 - 2 . 9 1 - 4 . 2 3 - 4 . 3 6 - 7 . 6 8 - ? . 1 8
- 1 3 . 5 5 - 1 3 - 6 5 - 1 5 - 0 4 - 2 6 - 4 7 - 2 9 . 3 7 - 4 1 . 9 7 , - 9 4 . 8 1
- 1 0 9 . 8 9 - 1 7 4 . 6 0 - 2 0 3 . 7 0 - 2 3 3 . 5 7 - 2 7 6 . S 9 - 3 0 5 . 6 9 - 3 9 3 . 3 8 - 3 8 9 . 4 8 - 4 0 0 - 5 3 - 4 5 6 . 5 4 - 4 8 5 . 6 3 - 5 3 3 . 2 1 - 5 6 2 . 5 8 - 6 6 3 . 7 1
- 3 0 8 3 . 3 0
A R I O - i l l
A T .
M . L K .
3 6
1 0
5 3
2
1 1
6 9
3
4 4
6
6 4
7
6 1
2 6 1 4
1 9
2 7
6 0
2 2
2 3
3 2
1 8
5 7
1 9
5 0
4 7
L 3 1 4 2
L 3 9 1 2 9 ) 2 8 i 3 5 ) 33 L 4 0 J 37 } 4 3 3 25 ] 4 6 3 3 8 5 5 1 I 4 1 3 2 0 3 5 6 I 4 8 3 17 2 45 3 12 I 4 9 1 3 0 I 58 2 52 1 59 I 2 4 1 2 1 1 6 2 1 16 1 13 I 63 1 9 2 9 1 6 6
5 2 55 2 34 1 4
I 2 5 4
( S O L I D SPACER) •
SHEAR « * T . STRESS NUM.
3 0 4 . 0 4 2 1 6 8 . 9 8 2 1 2 1 . 7 1 2
8 8 . 9 5 2 3 8 . 9 4 2 8 8 . 7 0 2 3 8 . 2 7 1 3 3 . 9 5 I 9 0 . 0 9 2 7 2 . 4 8 I 6 7 . 2 6 2 5 8 . 0 9 1 4 0 . 3 5 2 3 9 . 5 4 2 3 1 . 7 3 I 1 6 . 9 1 1 1 2 . 6 3 2
9 . 1 0 1 6 . 7 5 I 6 . 3 9 I 5 . 5 1 1 5 . 2 8 3 5 . 2 7 3 5 . 0 2 3 4 . 6 4 3 3 . 5 0 I 2 . 6 9 3 2 . 1 3 1 1 . 7 2 3 1 . 6 1 3 1 . 5 1 3 1 . 2 3 3 1 . 0 1 3 0 . 6 7 3 0 . 5 9 3 0 . 2 7 3 0 . 1 3 3 0 . 0 9 I
- 1 . 3 1 1 - 3 - 9 6 - 4 . 6 9 I
- 1 6 . 7 3 1 - 1 7 . 7 2 1 - 2 6 . 9 0 1 - 2 7 . 6 6 I - 2 8 . 7 0 1 - 3 1 . 1 3 1 - 3 2 - 1 0 1 - 3 3 . 4 1 1 - 3 5 - 0 9 I - 3 7 . 2 7 1 - 3 8 . 8 1 - 4 0 . 0 4 1 - 4 0 . 2 5 1 - 4 8 . 3 9 2 - 5 0 . 8 1 I - 5 4 . 6 9 1 - 9 9 . 3 3 - 9 3 - 4 6 I - 9 9 - 7 4 1 - 9 0 . 0 7 2
- 1 1 7 . 0 2 1 - 1 2 0 - 5 5 1 - 1 2 4 . 7 4 1 - 1 7 2 . 1 8 2 - 3 2 4 . 0 3 2
I ' M 15C
LOC.
5 5 •»r
5 2 «3
1
1 9
5 8
4 2
4 5
14
10
4 0
2 4
3 2 2 4
3 1
1 9
5 0
3
6 0
4 8
5 1
5 6
4 6
4 3
6 2
3 9
6
2 9 2 9
2 0
1 7
1 2 3 7
2 3
3 3
3 5 k
6 6
2 6 4
4 7
1 6
1 « 4
6 3
3
35
5
2 2
3 l U
7
50 36
15 30 20 41 26 57 13 22 54 44
' S : S E i L i ^
- A X . R R t S . S T P E s :
2 3 1 6 . 3 0 2 2 5 0 . 9 0 2 2 5 9 . 5 0
1 9 4 . 4 5 7 9 4 . 6 6 76 7 . 6 5 72 6 . 6 1 7 1 2 . 0 ' ' 5 9 0 . 7 0 5 6 9 . 1 , 4 e 5 . 3 1 4 ' O . J l 3 5 0 . 9 2 3 4 0 . 5 6 •> 0 1 . 1 4
2 5 3 . o « 2 3 2 . 2 - 5 l<?2-75 1 7 3 . 3 4 1 6 9 . 17 1 6 0 . 1 ' ! 1 2 1 . 2 6 1 0 5 . 5 3
9 7 . 7 9 a 5 . 8 i 7 7 . 7 9 7 6 . 4 7 6 9 . 6 7 5 7 . 5 2 5 5 . 4 9 5 0 - 3 3 4 1 . 1 4 3 9 . 9 3 3 1 . 0 7 2 ' . 1 8 2 6 . 5 ' 2 3 . 8 0 1 4 . 5 6
1..5 2 9 . 3 5 7 . 4 - ' 4 . 0 ! 3 . I d 3 . 1 7 2 . 9 3 1 . 7 7 1 . 7 1 t . i l 0 . 7 -0 . 5 0 0 . 4 2 0 . 2 3 3 . 0 2
- 0 . 6 5 - 1 . 5 9 - 3 . 8 1 - ' . 3 0 - 9 . 0 3 - 3 . 1 -- 3 . 7 5
- 1 3 . 5 0 - I 0 . 4 O - 3 6 . 2 0
- 1 " ^ . 7-5 - 4 , 0 . 5 4 - • 3 8 6 . 8 9
T rC-O'JLJS
- A T . • .uw. L O C .
2 3 6 2 44 2 l l 2 10 2 53 2 7 6 2 5 2 1 2 I 6 5 1 3 1 6 1 6 4 1 7 2 27 I 6 1 1 1 4 I 15 1 73 I 5 7 I 2 2 1 6 0 2 19
3 2
1 5 8 2 18 I 42 I 4 1 I 30 I 39 1 4 0 1 5 0 I 4 7 I 24 1 -.I 1 3 1 I 48 2 3 4 I 13 1 I 1 5 I ••
4 2
1 5 9 6 3
: 2 0 3 29 3 4 3 3 4 6 1 33 3 39 3 35 3 - 1 3 3 7 -< ' 5 3 5 6 3 20 2 4 5 3 17 1 6 6 1 3 3 12 I 2 1 1 16 2 9 2 55 ? r 4
• < I S . P f l N . : r 9 £ : s
6 5 1 , 2 9 4 9 3 . 1 8 431 . 3 ; 2 5 4 . i 3
1 0 . 2 » ^ . 2 2 7 . 6 7 T . 4 6 ' . t o '. . M 1 . 3 7 0 . 3 0 3 . 1 0
-" - . '-- 0 . 2 9 -1 .06 , - ! . 5 0 - 2 . 1 4 - 7 . 2 4 -3 ,5<> - . , ^ 6 — , 5 7 - 9 . 2 6 - ^ . 5 6 - 9 . 3 9 - 9 . 7 9
- 1 1 . " 5 - 1 4 . 39 - 1 7 . 5 6 - 1 9 . 2 9 - 3 C . 7 0 - 3 2 , 0 1 - 3 3 , 3 5 - 3 - . 03 - 5 7 . 1 3 - 5 0 . 0 1 - • > 1 . 75 - 6 1 . 2 4 - 6 1 . 4 5 - 6 1 . T4 - 6 5 . 7 0 - * 3 . "-a -•44 . «0 - 0 4 . it. - 9 J . 9 3
- I X . 3 4 - 1 34 . 36 - U l . 3 4 - 1 1 ; . 79 - 1 9 C . ^ - 2 0 - < . 76 - 7 2« . 3 9 - Z ' ^ . 16 - 3 OP . 36 - 3 2 6 . 30 - 3 5 3 . 5 1 - 4 0 0 . 5 3 - 4 2 ' . 2 ! - 4 5 8 . ,4 - 4 9 7 . 5 7 - 5 3 ' . . 14 - 5 6 2 .3(1 - a 6 » . 73 - 4 77 . •»-;
- ' 5 - , ' . r. - ' 0 9 t . •'0
" A T . t o * .
~ L
Z
2
2
I 1
1
I
2
1 1
7
1
3
I
3
1
I
1
3
3
3
I
3 1
7
3
I T
'' I
1
I
I
I
1
2
1
• '• I
I
2
1
2
' • I
• 1
; I I I 2
1 2 ? 2
L d C .
1 1
3 6
* 2 i 2 7
5 C 2
4 7 7
3 2
e l
2 3 3 5
3 3
2 ' '
1 5
2 7 a 4
3
e
2 5
3 3
, 3
4 8
• 4 2 0
5 1
in
6 U
1 7
1 2 k 9
1 5 ^ 7
; 4 3 1
- 0
€ ,
3 9
2 3
5 ' 5 *
- ?
10 3 0
;o - I
5 0
c*-^ 1
62 5 3 1'» t o 13
3 6 6
9 5
n 34
4 1
3".
Material Information
Material No.
1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant
147
3R0ERED STRESSES SCENARIO-IV (SOLID SPACER! « ITH 150 RSI SEALANT -OOULUS
Y-NORM MA STRESS NU
1 1 6 9 1 . 0 0 2 1 0 8 4 9 . 0 0 2
3 6 S 9 . 6 0 2 3 4 8 0 . 8 0 2 2 9 » 9 . 6 0 2 1 3 6 8 . 3 0 7
9 4 6 . 6 9 2 5 3 9 . 4 8 2 5 3 9 . 0 8 2 U 2 . 4 9 I 1 0 8 . 0 7 1
3 9 . 3 2 1 4 8 . 5 7 I 3 8 . 6 4 I 3 1 . 5 1 1 2 3 . 3 9 1 2 3 . 2 4 1 2 2 . 0 8 1 2 1 . 9 1 3 1 7 . 1 4 1 1 6 . 7 4 1 1 9 . 8 5 3
3 . 3 7 1 7 . 2 9 1 6 . 1 1 3 5 . 5 2 3 . 9 6 3 . 8 9 3 . 8 2 3 . 6 6 3 . 6 9 3 . 3 1
- 9 . 2 9 - 0 . 3 6 - 1 - 5 7 - 3 . 6 8 - 3 . 9 2 - 4 . 4 9 - 6 . 6 7 - 7 . 4 0 - 9 . 4 3
- 1 3 . 6 8 - 1 0 . 8 8 - 1 1 . 3 6 - 1 1 . 7 7 - 1 5 . 2 9 - 1 6 . 7 8 - 1 9 . 8 8 - 2 0 . 3 3 - 2 4 . 3 1 - 2 4 . 9 5 - 3 3 . 9 9 - 3 1 . 1 0 - 3 3 . 2 5 - 3 8 . 7 4 - 4 0 . 5 1 - 4 9 . 5 8 - 6 0 . 5 1 - 7 2 . 3 4 - 7 4 . 4 6
- 3 9 0 . 0 8 - 3 8 0 . C 9
- 2 6 0 2 . 5 0 - 2 9 9 1 . 9 0 - 3 2 9 9 . 8 0
- 1 2 8 1 9 . 0 0
T . N . L X .
1 1 4 4 5 2 3 6 26 2 T 1 0 3 4 32 3 1 3 0 2 4 5 7 5 8 4 7 4 8 5 0 4 9 5 6 2 3
7 1 5 1
6 6 3
) 4 6 L 6 2 ) 2 8 L 6 1 1 2 9 1 8 i 33 L 6 5 J 3 5 i 4 3 I 6 4 J 3 7 I 6 3 I 4 s 6 I 5 I 4 0 3 38 1 6 0 1 1 3 25 I 5 9 1 3 9 3 2 0 I 2 1 4 1 1 4 2 I 2 2 2 19 I 15 3 17 1 1 4 I 1 6 I 2 1 I 13 1 1 2 2 5 3 2 9 2 1 8 2 5 4 2 4 9 2 55
2 -NCRM « STRESS ^U
1 3 4 3 0 . 0 0 2 7 6 6 7 . 2 0 2 3 4 5 5 . 7 0 2 3 1 8 7 . 2 0 2 2 1 0 0 . 0 0 2 1 9 3 2 . 3 0 2 1 1 9 4 . 3 0 2
9 1 6 . 8 4 1 6 0 7 . 9 1 1 4 1 6 . 5 7 2 3 7 5 . 7 0 2 3 5 5 . 8 1 1 3 0 7 . 6 6 1 2 9 2 . 0 7 2 2 3 7 . 2 4 1 1 6 2 . 6 6 1 1 3 1 . 5 0 1 1 2 8 . 7 0 1 1 2 3 . 2 0 I
9 1 . 4 0 1 4 8 . 1 3 1 4 7 . 8 0 1 4 6 . 9 3 I 3 3 . 7 7 1 3 2 . 3 8 ] 1 8 . 6 7 1 1 4 . 1 7 1 1 3 . 7 0 1 1 3 . 4 2 1 1 0 . 3 0 3
6 . 0 3 3 3 . 7 8 3 2 . 7 6 1 . 9 7 1 . 2 7 0 . 6 2
- 0 . 2 8 - 4 . 9 6 - 9 . 0 7 - 7 . 1 1 - 9 . 5 9
- 1 1 - 0 6 - 1 7 . 5 8 - 1 7 . 6 3 - 2 7 . 2 5 - 3 2 . 3 7 - 3 3 . 3 1 - 3 6 . 8 9 - 4 1 . 9 6 - 4 2 . 1 2 - 9 8 . 6 3 - 6 7 . 3 0 - 7 9 . 3 4 - 9 9 . 1 6
- 1 1 6 . 8 9 - 1 3 6 . 6 1 - 1 4 3 . 8 1 - 1 4 8 . 4 1 - 2 2 9 . 8 0 - 3 6 9 . 5 8 - 6 3 5 . 7 2 - 8 9 7 . 7 1
- 2 5 5 1 . 4 0 - 7 « 3 8 . 1 0 - 3 0 3 7 . 6 0
- 1 2 7 9 7 . 0 9
A T . M . L C C .
3 6 10 53 11 4 4 .
2 7 2 6
1 4
18 1 9 6 6
5 3 2 63 5 7 50 6 0 6 2 4 7 4 2 15 14 6 1 3 0 2 2 3 9 5 9
a t 5 6 ) 91 1 4 6 1 2 9 ) 28 ) 35 i 43 3 33 I 4 0 3 25 5 3 7 ; 2 0 3 38 3 17 1 4 1 1 2 3 1 4 a 1 12 1 3 1 I 58 I 4 9 1 6 4 1 24 2 4 5 1 7 1 2 1 1 13 1 16 1 65 2 32 1 6 1 3 1 2 7 9 2 55 2 34 2 54
SHEAR STRESS
5 6 6 . 0 8 5 6 5 . 1 7 5 1 9 . 1 0 4 4 6 . 4 8 4 4 6 . 4 7 3 1 6 . 0 4 2 3 4 . 1 6 2 2 8 . 9 7 1 9 4 . 7 9 1 6 7 . 1 6 1 5 9 . 3 4 1 1 3 . 3 3 1 0 1 . 2 3
9 5 . 0 0 9 5 . 0 0 6 2 . 3 6 6 0 . 5 2 5 6 . 4 2 5 6 . 2 3 5 1 . 3 3 5 0 - 0 9 3 8 . 9 1 3 4 . 3 9 2 9 . 1 4 2 8 . 1 3 2 8 . 0 9 2 6 . 2 0 2 6 . 2 0 2 5 . 8 0 2 5 . 6 9 2 2 . 0 4 2 1 . 7 1 2 1 . 5 9 1 6 . 2 1 1 3 . 5 9
9 . 2 3 7 . 0 8 6 . 5 7 6 . 2 0 5 . 5 6 5 . 3 1 4 . e 9 3 . 0 8 2 - 0 5 1 . 1 8 0 . 3 8 0 . 2 8
- 3 . 4 8 - C . 0 3 - 6 . 1 0
- 1 0 . 4 1 - 1 0 . 4 4 - 2 2 . 0 3 - 2 4 . 5 9 - 2 5 . 1 2 - 2 9 . 1 2 - 5 8 . 8 9 - 7 3 . 0 6 - 7 6 . 4 2 - 9 0 . 4 8 - 9 9 . 6 7
- 1 2 1 . 4 7 - 1 9 7 . 0 9 - 3 4 7 . 6 8 - 6 2 5 . 5 5 - 7 0 5 . 9 2
- * 7 . .•4JM.
7
2 7
2 7
2 2 7
2 2 2 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 3 3 3 3 I 1 I 3 1 1 1 3 I
, 3 3 1 3 3 3 1 3 I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I
I i
2
L 3 C .
45 27 52 93
9 19 34 32 26 10 18 14 58 31 42
3 24
6 4
-.0 2
60 62 66
I 64 51 46 5a 43 50
3 5
38 7
16 25 20 30 17 29 12 37 28 33 63 35 65 48 61 59 47 22 21 ' . 0
15 39 59 i : 57 41
-44 54 36 11
« » X . R R I N . « A T . STRESS NOM.
1 3 4 6 9 . 0 0 , 1 1 7 4 9 . 0 0 ; 1 0 8 9 4 . 0 0 1
7 6 7 1 . 4 0 3 7 2 3 . 7 0 3 5 0 6 . 9 0 3 0 1 9 . 0 0 2 2 8 1 . 9 0
9 1 7 . 6 9 6 7 2 . 7 9 6 1 3 . 0 3 5 9 4 . 7 4 5 4 9 . 1 4 4 2 5 . 0 1 3 5 8 . 2 4 3 9 9 . 12 2 3 7 . 2 4 2 1 2 . 5 8 1 7 5 . 0 4 1 3 8 . 6 3 1 3 6 . 0 1 1 3 2 . 5 1 1 2 4 . 6 8 1 1 8 . 4 1 1 0 9 . 1 6 1 0 8 . 5 7 1 0 6 . 4 1 1 9 4 . 1 1
9 3 . 1 7 7 8 . 7 9 ' 1 . 1 0 5 9 . 5 9 5 4 . 6 9 4 4 . 1 3 4 2 . 7 4 3 4 . 0 7 1 4 . 7 5 3 1 . 1 7 3 0 . 7 4 2 9 . 4 1 2 7 . , 0 6 2 5 . 3 2 l - J . O l 1 7 . 2 6 1 7 . 0 4
9 . 9 3 9 . 6 3 3 . 0 2 9 . 3 4 5 . 2 4 1 . 5 0 1 . 4 9 1 . 3 2 3 . 5 1
- 0 . 5 9 - 1 . 3 6 - 5 . 3 9
- 1 6 . 2 3 - 1 7 . 9 0
- 2 1 . 5 8 - 3 2 . 3 3 - 4 9 . 6 8 - 5 1 . 2 0
- 2 1 1 . 8 7 - 2 0 3 7 . 5 0 - 2 9 7 9 . 6 0
6
1 7
I 2 I 1 7
1 3 1
1 3 7
I 3 3
3 3 I
1
I 1 7 •»
LOC.
36 1 1 • • 4
10 5 2 5 3 2 6 2 7
1 12
4 3 4 1 9 18 6 6
5 6 3 5 7 3 1 6 0 9 0 6 2 14 2 3 5 8 1 0 2 4 4 2 4 7 4 1
8 1 9 15 4 0 5 6 6 1 5 1 4 6 4 9 4 8 22 4 3
7 4 5 5 9 6 4 2 9
3 1 9 2 9
6 33 35 6 5 29 37 >0 17
2 I 3 12 16 21
9 45 - 4
• I N . » R I M . " A T . STRESS NUM. LOC.
1 4 4 1 . 4 0 2 3 1 2 " . 0 0 2 7 0 9 5 . 6 0 2 1 1 3 4 . 0 0 2 1 0 1 8 . 7 0 2
9 4 2 . 5 4 2 1 5 4 . 3 6 2
3 2 . 0 7 1 2 9 . 7 4 1 2 3 . 7 1
5 . 6 5 1 2 . 6 9 1 3 . 6 9 3
- 0 . 3 0 3 - 1 . 0 7 3 - 1 . 3 9 I - 2 - 0 5 3 - 3 . 7 9 I - 3 - 9 2 1 - 8 . 87 I - 8 . 9 2 3 - 9 . 4 1 I
- 1 0 . 0 3 3 - 1 1 . 9 1 - 1 6 . 2 5 3 - 1 7 . 8 7 3 - 18 . 72 1 - 2 0 . 8 0 1 - 2 1 . 2 8 3 - 2 2 . 0 7 3 - 2 9 . 5 7 3 - 2 7 . 0 9 3 - 3 2 . 3 9 1 - 3 9 . 3 8 1 - 4 0 . 1 1 3 - 4 1 . 1 4 1 - 5 0 . 7 7 1 - 5 4 . 0 1 - 5 8 . 5 8 - 4 2 . 1 9 - 7 0 . 14 - 7 4 . 98 - 7 9 . . 4 - 9 0 . 9 4 - 8 8 . 3 9
- 1 0 0 . 7 3 - 112 . 48 - 1 1 8 . 2 6 - 1 2 0 . 6 9 - 1 2 6 . 1 1 - 1 2 8 . 54 - 1 4 4 . 71 - 1 4 8 . 4 1 - 1 8 7 . 3 8 - 2 0 3 . 53 - 2 9 7 . 0 8 - 3 7 8 . 15 - • • 3 1 . 37 - 6 3 6 . 4 9 - 9 0 0 - ! 6
- 7 6 1 0 . 9 0 - 7 6 3 9 . 4 0 - ' 0 5 2 . 3 0 - 3 3 9 6 . 4 0
- 1 2 9 ' » . 0 0 - 1 2 8 1 6 . 0 0
36 11 4 4
2 6 27 1 0 32 3 0 , 7 5 0 6 6 6 1 29 35 33 5 7 2 9 6 2 a3
5 3 7
4 5 6
I 25 5 1 5 9 6 0 4 6 2 0 4 3 3 8 4 8 22
1 17 15 4 9
8 , 0
l-s L 6-. 1 12 L 3 1 L 4 2 1 2 4
' 1 58 1 14 1 4 1 . • « • I 2 1 s 23 I 16 I a5 I 13 2 l o 2 52 I 6 2 53 1 3 1 2 2 U 2 3 2 34 2 45 2 54 2 55
Material Information
Material No.
1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant
148
QROEREO STRESSES S C E N A R I O - 1 ( S P L I T SPACER!
y-NORM STRESS
9 4 1 7 . 6 0 1 8 2 0 . 4 0 1 9 3 S . 1 0
7 3 2 . 4 9 3 9 1 . 1 4
4 9 . 2 3 3 9 . 4 9 2 9 . 1 4 2 4 . 4 0 2 4 . 3 9 2 3 . 0 6 1 8 . 8 9 1 7 . 3 2 1 7 . 4 7 1 6 . 7 8 1 9 . 9 8 1 3 . 8 8 1 2 . 0 8 1 1 . 3 1 1 1 . 2 7 1 1 . 0 0 1 0 . 3 9 1 0 . 1 3
8 . 1 9 7 . 4 6 9 . 7 i 9 . 0 0 4 . 2 9 3 . 8 6 3 . 6 7 3 . 6 1 2 . 6 3 0 . 3 1 0 . 2 9 0 . 1 9 0 . 0 8 0 . 0 1
- 0 . 1 7 - 0 . 2 1 ' - 0 . 2 1 - 2 . 0 9 - 3 - 7 7 - 3 . 8 1 - 4 . 3 8 - 4 , 7 2 - 9 . 7 8 - 6 . 1 3 - 7 . 3 0 - 8 . 0 7
- 1 3 . 2 1 - 1 9 , 1 9 - 1 9 . 8 1 - 2 2 . 1 0 - 2 2 . 5 1 - 2 3 . 3 7 - 2 3 . 7 7 - 2 9 . 9 0 - 2 9 . 9 8 - 4 2 . 9 1 - 4 3 . 1 4 - 9 1 . 0 8
- 2 6 9 . 4 7 - 9 6 7 . 4 6 - 9 4 8 . 4 3
- 2 1 7 4 . 3 0 - 6 6 6 2 . 8 0
MA NUI L O C .
2 6 2 7 49 11 18 32 3 4 4 2 13 1 2 4 3 17 16 39 ? 9 21 41 22 3 4 14
2 9 9 6 0 1 9 4 0 6 6 2 0 3 7 6 9 6 2 6 1
6 3 9
5 1 9
9 3 4 6
4 8
3 3 3
4 7 4 8 2 3 7
28 64 63 91 29 96 24 29 10 98 30 97 31 49 50 52 59 36 19 44
Z-NCRM STRESS
8 7 8 9 . 4 0 2 2 4 3 . 4 0 1 7 7 6 . 9 0
6 4 6 . 6 6 4 6 5 . 8 1 2 9 4 . 0 7 2 8 6 . 5 3 2 4 0 . 7 2 2 0 2 . 1 9 1 6 7 . 6 1 1 6 9 . 1 3 1 3 6 . 5 3 1 2 7 . 9 3 1 1 2 . 4 9
0 4 . 7 7 9 7 . 0 7 5 3 . 2 8 4 2 . 3 1 3 6 . 7 0 3 9 . 4 7 3 9 . 3 1 2 1 . 5 9 1 9 . 2 8 1 9 . 1 7 1 7 . 9 1 1 7 . 6 1 1 1 . 7 4 1 0 . 8 3
9 . 9 3 9 . 7 3 8 . 3 9 8 . 4 2 3 . 9 0 3 . 4 9 2 . 0 8 1 . 1 6 0 . 9 4
- 0 . 3 9 - 0 . 6 1 - 0 . 9 3 - 1 . 9 3 - 3 . 5 8 - 6 . 5 9 - 9 . 4 4
- 1 9 . 1 4 - 1 0 . 3 9 - 1 0 . 7 9 - 2 8 . 9 9 - 3 7 . 4 9 - 6 9 . 1 9 - 7 6 . 6 7 - 9 7 . 1 1
- U 7 . 7 4 - 1 4 9 . 9 1 - 1 6 7 . 1 0 - 1 6 7 . 6 3 - 1 7 9 . 1 9 - 1 9 4 . 3 8 - 2 1 1 . 8 0 - 2 2 7 . 3 1 - 2 2 8 . 6 3 - 2 9 8 . 3 6 - 4 2 4 . 5 4
- 1 7 0 1 . 7 0 - 2 3 * 2 . 5 0 - 5 3 6 4 . 2 0
T . L X .
2 7 2 6 3 4
2 3 6
1 1 6 6 6 3 6 2 19 59 7 58 13 49 48 13 10 16 14 41 13 23 21 22 53 12 49 38 31 IT 40 37 20 24 33 39 46
9 30 23 ?l 56 39 25 29
8 42 54 47 52 SO 57 49
9 60 61 64 69 55 4 I
44 32 36
SHEAR STRESS NWI.
434.13 409.67 156.77 156.65 127.62 115.84 81.07 60.42 52.35 49.87 42.51 35.31 25.17 21.49 19.85 17.27 16.37 11.48 7.72 7.31 0.64 0.43 O.OI
-1.61 -1.62 -1.74 -3.06 -3.20 -7.34
-10-32 -10.79 -10.84 -11.08 -11.38 -11.39 -11.76 -11.79 -11.84 -12.02 -14.09 -14.51 -14.72 -15.57 -18.21 -19.75 -22-27 -26.88 -27.33 -28.11 -35.33 -37.21 -40.14 -53.90 -57.62 -73.97
-108.56 -109.07 -144.98 -149.19 -186.78 -186.85 -187.12 -214.27 -259.65 -312.39 -312.37
ITH 250 'S: OEALAS' «n?'JLj5
LOC.
26 44 27 65 57 63 61 59 10 VI 54 23 48 39 49 47 50 13 21 30 15
9 53 39 33 22 37 28 16 38 29 29 43 2C 46 51 17 12 56
< 1
40 7
42 3
6 31 24 14 60 36 62 64 58 52 66 45 18 55 U 19 34 32
9 4 4 7 . 8 0 9 7 0 3 . 0 " 1 3 3 1 . 3 0 1 5 5 3 . 3 0
3 1 8 . 7 5 6 4 7 . 8 3 4 8 1 . 4 3 4 6 6 . 6 4 3 1 3 . 1 3 2 9 6 . 7 6 2 5 3 . 4 6 1 9 6 . 0 5 1 9 3 . 6 0 1 7 2 . 9 3 1 6 0 . 7 9 1 2 9 . 0 2
3 9 . 7 5 3 8 - 7 1 3 2 . 9 « 6 7 . 7 5 6 7 . 0 2 6 " . 1 9 6 2 . 7 2 5 1 . 0 6 4 7 . 9 ? 4 4 . 5 0 3 9 . 4 2 3 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 5 5 3 1 . 2 6 3 0 . 2 4 3 0 . 0 5 2 0 . 3 7 . 2 9 . 2 9 2 9 . 5 1 2 6 . 6 6 2 6 . 5 6 2 4 . 7 2 2 4 . 4 / 2 4 . 1 6 2 0 . 5 1 1 9 . 3 1 1 » . U 1 5 . 8 9 1 9 . C 2 1 1 - 7 4 1 1 - 0 0
6 . 9 7 2 . 3 4 1 . 5 5 1 - 4 6 1 . 4 5 1 . 3 1 0 . 6 5 0 . 2 9 0 . 0 9
- 0 . 1 1 - 1 . 4 1 - 1 . 5 3 - 3 . 4 4 - » . 0 3
- 1 3 . 6 * - 4 7 . 2 8
- 1 4 5 . 6 2 - 9 4 7 . 6 3
- 1 6 6 8 . 1 0
L C C .
?6 7 7 34 4 5 11
2 18
3 6«
6 6 3 6 2 19 5 8 5 9
•»
4 9 32 65 41 10 14 4 8 57 13 2 3 6 4 16 61 12 5 4 42 4 3 39 24 31 17 2 1 6 0 38 , 0 15 22
9 20 5 3 4 6 37 91 35
5 4
3 3 I 9
4 7 10 28 5 6 2 9 25 5 2 5 0 5 5 3 6
• i n . 3R : •« . - A T . S T R E S S MUM.
? 7 I 7 . 30 1 8 1 6 . 3 0
2 0 0 . 2 7 1 8 . 7 9 1 4 . 9 0 1 1 . 5 7 9 . 3 3 9 . 1 6 9 . 1 5 4 . . 1 1 . 57 2 . 6 1 2 . 3 5 0 . 3 1 0 . 7 5 0 . 0 1
- O . 0 6 - • . 0 0 - ! . 79 - ' . 9 3 - 4 . 6 0 - 7 . 5 7 - 7 . 9 3 - 9 . 3 0 - * . 1 6
- 1 1 . 7 8 - 1 3 . 32 - l ' . 9 l - 1 9 . 4 9 - 1 8 . 6 0 - 2 1 . 3 7 - 7 2 . 1 0 - 2 4 . 7 ' - 2 6 . 5 3 - 2 7 . 72 - 2 8 . 3 7 -3<3.05 - 3 1 . 7 0 - ? Z . 2 9 - 4 7 . 37 - < . 4 . 0 9 - 4 5 . 3 1 - - = . 4 9 - 5 3 . ao - 5 9 . 38 - o O . 57 - 6 4 > . 6 3 - 5 0 . 5 6 - 9 4 . 1 3 - 3 4 . 2 4
- 1 2 1 . 5 4 - 1 6 8 . 8 1 - 1 8 7 . 3 2 - 1 8 9 . 5 3 - 2 2 3 . 5 2 - 2 3 0 . 5 4 - 2 5 9 . 7 1 - 3 0 0 . 3 1 - 3 0 6 . . 1 - 3 4 8 . 9 3 - 4 2 5 . C3 - 6 5 0 . . 6
- 2 2 0 2 . 3 0 - 2 4 2 2 . 0 0
. - 5 3 6 5 . 0 0 - a 6 ' ) 6 . 4 0
L C C .
2 6 2 7 11 13 16 22
2 21 15 18 12 - 3 38 37 17 53
o 9
35 33
3 7
20 2 9 4 0 4 6 4 « 5 9 34 14 39 5 1 62 2 9 5 6 25 23 3 0 '\ >'i
i , 9 2 4
10 63 3 1 ao - 7 54 59 5 0
4 4 5 60 6 1 5 7 6 4
4 65 52
1 55 1 5 32 36
Material Information
Material No.
1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant
'•J.<0£R£J STRESSES i C £ M A « l C - l I I S P L K 5?lCcH» -1T»- 250 PSI S£A«.AAr "CCU.US
149
r - N O R M M A T . STRESS NU
3 3 2 8 . 9 0 2 1 0 7 4 . 1 0 2 1 0 3 2 . 9 0 2
« 9 6 . 7 0 2 1 7 9 . 1 4 2 1 7 6 . 9 9 2 1 7 3 . 8 0 2 10 7 . 7 6 2
6 4 . 8 4 2 3 9 . 2 6 1 1 3 . 0 1 1 1 6 . 0 9 1 1 5 . 8 9 I 1 5 . 1 5 i 1 4 . 6 9 I 1 3 . 2 6 1 1 2 . 1 2 1 1 1 . 7 4 1 1 0 . 1 0 1
9 . 9 2 3 9 . 7 8 1 9 . 4 1 3 3 . 7 3 3 3 . 6 1 1 7 . 7 4 5 . 9 5 3 5 . 8 0 4 . 2 8 J 3 . 9 7 3 . 8 9 3 . 6 1 3 - 2 9 2 . 9 k ] 2 . 7 9 2 . 4 4 1 . 7 0 1 . 5 6 1 . 3 4 l - l 1 0 . 9 7 0 . 7 0 3 . 3 6 0 . 2 0 0 - 1 4 3 . 0 4 3 . 0 1
- 0 . i 2 - 0 . 4 9 — 0 . o 4 - 0 . 6 4 - 2 . 1 2 - 2 . 4 7 - 2 . 8 C - 3 . 7 7 - 4 . 9 1 - 5 . 5 1 - 7 . 2 4 - 9 . 9 4
- 1 4 . 1 8 - 1 6 . 1 4 - 1 7 . 4 9 - 2 1 . 0 7 - 3 4 . 4 2 - 3 7 . 6 7
- 2 3 7 . 6 5 - 7 7 0 . 3 9
M . u C C .
44 3 6 2 6 2 7 3 4 32 52 5 9 18 3 1 2 1 42 3 0 25 22 6 0 3 6 4 1 14 4 6 5 9
1 2 0 ) 4 3
13 I 5 1 1 2 9 L 16 L 62 1 5 6 L oS L 15 i 17 I 4 7 L 6 1 2 54 1 3 9 1 5 1 4 0 . 6 3 2 3 3 3 8 L 2 4 L 1 L 3 2 9 2 53 3 33 3 35 3 3 7 L ** I 2 1 4 8 3 12 1 7 I 3
2 10 1 6 4 I 6 3 1 2 3 1 5 7 2 1 1 1 58 1 5 0 1 4 9 2 19 I 45
Z-KCUP " 4 1 . STRESS : u j M .
3 9 8 8 . 6 0 2 1 9 6 2 . C O 2
6 6 9 . 7 5 2 3 2 1 . 8 1 I 3 8 1 . 6 3 1 2 5 0 . 4 9 1 1 7 7 . 1 8 I 1 4 C . 7 0 1 1 3 1 . : i 2 1 2 9 . 5 0 1 1 0 6 - 5 2 1
7 4 . C 6 1 5 6 . i 7 1 5 2 . 6 2 I 5 2 . 3 4 1 4 6 . 3 2 I 3 7 . 3 4 2 3 3 . 4 7 1 2 3 . 3 6 : 2 2 . 5 7 2 1 3 . 3 7 2 1 1 . 9 0 1 1 1 . C 9 1
9 . 2 0 2 6 . 6 6 3 4 . 2 2 3 3 . 7 9 2 3 . 7 8 3 2 - 3 7 3 2 . 3 3 3 z.ez 3 2 . 5 9 2 2 . 0 6 1 z.az I 1 . 4 6 3 1 . 2 6 3 1 . 3 9 1 : - 4 5 3 0 . 2 9 3 C I O 3
- C . 1 7 2 - 0 . 2 9 1 - C . 5 1 1 -O.t-^ 3 - 0 . 6 6 3 - 1 4 4 1 3 - 3 . 6 9 1
- 1 3 . 2 3 1 - 1 4 . 3 8 2 - 1 4 . 5 1 2 - 2 1 . 1 2 - 2 5 . 3 6 2 - 3 6 . 6 7 I - 4 < i . 8 8 1 - 5 6 . 1 2 1 - 5 9 . 7 3 I - 7 5 . 3 8 1 - 8 1 . 2 4 I
- 1 3 4 . c a 1 - 1 3 2 . 0 4 1 - 1 6 C . 2 6 I - 1 3 2 . 7 8 I - 2 2 7 . 9 9 2 - 2 7 9 . C d 1 - 3 7 2 . 1 1 I - a 2 3 . 2 7 2
L - C .
2 7 •.4 6 6 6 3 a2
1 4
2 6 5 9
5 3
13 16 53 2 1 55 24 4 9 45 5 2 3 3 4 8 10 25 2 9 1 1 4 6 4 3 5 1 2 9 53 42 4 1 17 5 6 39 2 8 35 3 3
5 4 0 4 7 37 J 3
12 50 3 1 54 13 57 n 2 3 ZZ 15 14
7 3 0
6 T
2 6 1 3 2 6 4 65 3 4
SHEAR ' A T . STRESS NUM.
1 7 2 . 2 9 2 1 6 7 . 4 6 1 1 2 ! . 9 6 1 1 2 9 . 0 3 1
9 3 . 1 3 2 9 2 - 4 2 1 E l . 6 9 2 7 2 . 9 5 I 4« . 9 4 2 . 4 . 7 8 2 • • 1 . 8 5 2 3 9 . 9 5 1 2 7 . 7 7 1 2 * . 3 9 1 3 1 . 1 4 2 1 . 3 3 1 1 2 . 5 4 2 1 2 . 3 3 1 1 1 . 5 3 2 1 1 . 2 3 i 1 1 . 0 3 1 1 C . 6 2 I
^ . 6 0 1 5 . 2 6 2 5 . 0 5 I a . 1 7 1 8 . 0 1 1 7 . a 6 2 t . 9 2 1 5 . 2 6 1 2 . 3 5 3 1 . 3 2 3 1 . 8 0 3 1 . 3 J 3 1 . 7 2 3 1 . 5 8 3 1 . 5 7 3 1 . 5 5 3 1 . 5 5 3 1 . 3 3 I 1 . 2 1 3 C . 9 3 3 C . 7 4 1 0 . 7 1 1 0 . 4 5 3 C . 1 2 2 C . 0 7 3 0 . 3 2 3 C . O l 2
- C - 3 0 1 - C . 4 5 1 - 1 . 0 6 I - 2 . 0 6 1
- 1 4 . 8 8 I - 2 1 . 9 3 I - 2 4 . 9 2 I - 2 8 . 3 1 2 - 2 9 . 7 0 - 4 1 . 6 1 L - t c . a 9 1 - 7 8 . 3 7 2 - 6 1 . 1 7 2 - 9 7 . 3 5 I
- 1 0 6 . 6 7 1 - 1 3 5 . 5 7 1 - 2 2 2 . 9 9 Z
L u C .
27 a5 57 63 45 a l . . 4 .
59 34 32 ' 52 23 33 41 13 39 10 50 2o 21 4 9
7 5
54 44
1 3
18 15 4 7 29 51 56 46 43 IZ 17 20 t c
22 38 23
• >
•* 33
9 35 37 53 31 16
6 3
24 40 14 19 42 60 62 59 11 6 4 58 66 36
MAX. P R I M . <^ii1. STRESS Nl
4 0 0 9 . 5 0 2 3 3 3 1 . iO 2 1 9 8 4 . 6 0 2 1 0 3 3 . 0 0 2
5 5 5 . 6 3 1 4 2 0 . 3 3 1 2 6 4 . 7 2 1 1 3 4 . 0 6 2 1 8 1 . 3 8 2 1 8 1 . 3 3 2 1 7 7 . 3 6 I 1 6 0 . 7 5 1 1 5 3 . 3 - . 2 1 4 0 . 7 1 1 2 8 . 4 4 I 1 1 7 . 3 9 I 1 0 7 . 3 9 I
7 9 . 0 3 : 7 4 . 1 2 1 7 2 . 0 6 1 6 7 . 6 2 1 6 9 . 3 8 2 5 2 . 6 3 1 5 1 . 6 9 1 5 0 . 2 3 1 4 1 . 6 2 1 4 0 . 9 3 1 3 9 . 5 9 1 3 9 . 1 8 I 3 8 . 2 6 I 3 3 . 7 9 2 3 0 . 1 9 1 2 8 . 9 6 1 2 4 . 0 2 i 2 2 . 7 2 1 2 2 - 4 2 i 1 8 . 0 9 1 1 6 . 3 8 ; 1 6 • 3 8 1 9 . 6 2 1 3 - 4 3 1 4 . 9 3 1 0 . 4 0
9 - 3 4 9 . 2 4 8 . 3 5 6 - 9 2 6 . 7 3 6 . 5 4 4 . 8 7 4 . 4 0 4 . 1 9 2 . 3 9 1 . 6 8 1 . 4 1 1 . 1 2 0 . 6 2 0 . 4 3 0 . 2 9 0 . 0 9
- 0 . 3 8 - 0 . 6 2 - 2 . 1 2 - 2 . 2 3 - 3 . 7 3
- 2 1 . 4 5
i iM . s 3 C .
3 6 4 4 2 7 2 6 6 6 6 3 6 2 5 2 32 3 4
1 59 5 9
, 5 8 5 7
9 1 1
a 13 6 9 18 16 30 2 1 4 1 6 1 4 2 2 4 3 1 4 9 4 9 4 0 • 4 3 9 4 0 14 10 2 3
L 4 8 ! 2 3 I 7 2 S 4 6 S 2 0 i 4 3 » 5 1 i 2 9 1 4 7 2 5 4 i 5 6 I 15 3 17 2 5 3 3 2 8 3 3 8 1 6 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 9 2 9 3 1 2 3 3 7 1 2 1 7 1 5 0 2 19
M I N . P R I N . M A T . STRESS HUM. LOC.
I C 3 7 - 2 C 2 6 6 7 - 2 4 2 6 3 6 . C 9 2 1 3 1 . 4 8 2
1 4 . 3 9 1 6 . 3 8 3 5 . S O 1 3 . 7 9 3 3 . 2 9 3 3 - 1 1 2 2 . 8 7 3 2 . 2 2 3 1 . A 3 3 0 . 4 3 I 3 . 3 6 3 0 . 3 6 3 O . C l 2
• 0 . 1 8 1 - 0 . 2 2 2 - 0 . 2 5 3 - 0 . 4 7 3 - O . ' O 3 - 0 . 6 4 I H I . A 5 3 - 1 . 3 7 3 - 3 . 8 3 3 - 4 . 3 3 I - 4 . 9 6 1 - 9 . 3 9 1 - 6 . 6 8 1 - 6 . 9 9 1 - 9 . 9 6 1
- U . 7 0 2 - U . 7 4 i - U . 2 3 1 - 1 9 . 2 9 2 - 1 8 . 4 7 4 - 1 9 . 9 9 - 2 1 . 4 4 - 2 1 . 4 8
- : i .7o - a . 8 4 - J 9 . 4 7 - n . 8 9 - 3 9 . 3 8 - 3 9 . 4 6 - . 8 . 6 9 - 4 9 . 9 2 - 5 6 . 9 1 - 6 6 . 1 3 - . 7 . 7 1 - 7 7 . 4 1 - 8 8 . 7 0 - 9 6 . 9 9 - 9 7 . 1 8
- 1 0 4 . C 9 - 1 3 2 . 3 2 - 1 9 4 . * 2 - 1 6 0 . 2 6 - 2 2 0 . 9 6 - 2 3 2 . 8 8 - 2 4 1 . 3 6 - 3 1 0 . 3 9 - 4 3 5 . 8 8 - 7 8 1 . 1 8 - « 2 5 . 4 7
3 6 4 4 2 7 26 2 1 25 16 2 0 4 4 52 4 3 9 1 2 9
5 I T 5 6 53
1 9
23 33 35
. 3 7 38 12 * 7
8 2 4 13 4 8 62 10
! 5 9 3 1 18
t 34 I 39 L 4 2 1 4 0 L 6 6
3 0 I 5 9
4 1 50 4 9 63
I 2 2 19 2 3
1 14 1 7 2 11 1 6 0
1 3 8 1 6 1 3 1 9 7 1 2 1 6 1 2 32 2 19 1 6 4 1 65 2 4 9 2 34
Material Information
Material No.
1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant
150
T-NORM MA
STRESS NU
9 5 3 0 . 1 0 2 2 4 0 9 . 4 0 2 2 3 9 8 . 8 0 2 1 9 6 3 . 2 0 2
3 9 0 . 2 7 2 3 8 0 . 2 6 2
7 1 . 5 2 3 4 3 . 7 2 1 4 3 . 1 8 2 3 3 . 9 5 I 3 3 . 5 4 I 3 2 . 0 4 3 1 7 . 9 3 1 1 5 . 8 8 I 1 5 . 0 4 1
1 3 . 3 2 3 1 2 . 9 9 1 1 1 . 3 7 3 1 1 . 1 0 1 1 0 . 4 7 1 1 0 . 4 7 1
9 . 4 5 1 8 . 8 8 1
7 . 2 1 I 6 . 9 3 3
5 . 9 3 1 4 . 8 1 ] 4 . 6 6 4 . 2 7 \ 3 . 7 9 3 . 4 9 3 . 2 7 3 . 3 6 2 . 6 1 1 . 6 6 9 . 6 0 9 . 2 9
- 0 . 6 4 - 1 . 7 4 - 1 . 8 9 - 1 . 9 9
- 3 . 3 3 - 4 . 1 6 - 4 . 6 9 - 4 . 7 0 - 9 . 1 9 - 6 . 0 9 - 6 . 3 4 - 8 . 1 9 - 8 . 2 1
- 2 1 . 4 8 - 2 2 . 3 4
- 4 0 . 4 4 - 4 0 . 3 3 - 9 1 . 0 9 - 7 3 . 0 2 - 7 7 . 3 9
- 3 7 8 . 7 6 - 3 8 3 . 0 8 - 9 4 9 . 5 3 - 9 9 2 . 8 9
- 2 3 4 6 . 3 0 - 2 4 7 6 . 3 0 - 2 7 1 0 . 1 0 - 7 8 2 0 . 1 0 - 9 8 2 2 . 5 0
2RCEPE0
Y »
M . L I X .
59 5 4
4 5 18 5 3
9 12 13 19 1 6 2 1 17 15 14
2 2 0 2 2 2 9 5 9 3 9 6 0 4 1 4 2
1 1 3 8
4 0 6 6
L 6 9 L 8 L 4 L 6 1 L 6 2 L 6 3 3 7 L 9 > 9 1 1 3 5 i 3 3 ) 4 3 } 4 6 3 2 9 3 2 8 3 3 6 1 2 3 1 3 1 4 8 I 4 7 I 7 L 6 4 1 6 3 1 5 8 I 9 7 1 4 9 1 5 0 1 2 4 1 3 0 1 31 2 32 2 34 2 10 2 27 2 26 2 36 2 52 2 4 * 2 11
'-TOESSES SCEN
2-MCPM -t STRESS :.U
" 9 9 9 . 3 0 2 2 1 7 9 . 3 0 2 2 1 5 6 . 4 0 2 1 3 8 4 . 0 0 2
7 2 0 . 2 9 t 4 8 6 . 7 8 1 2 6 0 . 0 8 I 186 .17 1 176 .44 2 1 7 2 . 7 2 1 131 .83 1
9 1 . 7 9 I 8 4 . 8 5 I 76 .17 1 7 1 . 4 4 I 6 9 . 6 2 2 6 1 . 3 9 1 5 5 . 1 7 1 4 7 . 7 9 1 4 0 . 2 3 I 3 6 . 5 9 I 3 2 . 1 4 3 2 9 . 3 3 I 19 .53 1 1 4 . 6 3 3 1 3 . 7 2 I
9 , 3 4 3 6 . 1 3 ' 6 . 1 1 3 4 . 9 9 3 3 .88 1 0 . 4 4
- 0 . 2 9 - 0 . 4 7 - 1 . 2 1 - 1 . 4 3 - 1 . 4 9 - 1 . 9 3 - 1 . 7 3 - 2 . 9 0
- 1 1 . 4 6 - 1 7 . 0 6 - 3 9 . 1 4 - 4 4 . 9 1 - 6 3 . 1 8 - 7 4 . 0 8 - 7 4 . 8 4 - 8 9 . 8 8
- 1 0 0 . 4 8 - 1 0 3 . 6 2 - 1 1 3 . 2 7 - 1 1 4 . 9 1 - 1 2 0 . 7 1 - 1 2 6 . 0 2 - 1 9 7 . 5 4 - 2 9 6 . 0 1 - 2 9 6 . 1 0 - 3 1 6 . 8 3 - 4 6 5 . 0 0 - 8 9 8 . 8 0
- 1 4 1 4 . 1 0 - 1 4 9 9 . 8 0 - 2 4 4 6 . 6 0 - 2 6 5 1 . 7 0 - 5 9 4 8 . 2 0 - 9 5 4 6 . 6 0
ARIO-t ( S .
A T . H. L^C.
54 59 3 4
7
2 3 6
13 52 16 2 1
i 66 2 4 63 45 6 2 5 9 58
7 4 9 1 2 4 8 3 1 17
4 1 3 8
1 20 I 37 I 29
4 0 1 33 L 23 1 91 i 43 1 46 ) 35 3 28 1 29 3 56 I 39 I 30 I 42 I ZZ I 47 1 15 1 14 1 50 1 5 I 69 1 64 I 57 1 61 I 60 2 32 1 4 2 19 2 18 I 1 2 26 2 27 2 *«4 2 11 2 53 2 10 2 36
s l 9 SPACF!>)
:HEAR -4A STOCSS S'J
679 .77 2 4 4 0 . 1 4 2 290 .94 2 156.21 I 120.75 1 110 .66 I
93 .96 7 76 .82 I 74 .04 2 59 .89 1 57 .29 1 4C.96 1 27 .38 I 26 .26 1 24.72 1 21.10 I 17 .14 1 15.30 I 9 . 0 1 I 6 .49 1 9.36 1
- 0 . 3 2 3 - 0 . 4 2 t - 1 . 1 2 3 - 1 . 4 5 3 - 1 . 7 3 3 - 3 . 2 9 3 - 3 . 4 6 1 - 3 . 9 * 3 - 3 . 9 6 1 - 4 . 7 3 3 - 5 . 0 7 3
- 1 3 . 4 2 - 1 5 . 6 5 - 1 8 . 7 3 - 1 8 . 7 7 - 1 8 . 9 0 - 1 8 . 9 3 - 2 1 . 4 3 - 2 1 . 4 4 - 2 1 . 6 4 - 2 3 . 9 3 - 2 6 . 7 5 - 2 9 . 8 0 - 3 0 . 7 0 - 3 2 . 2 3 - 3 4 . 7 9 - 3 5 . 0 9 - 3 5 . 3 0 - 4 2 . 3 6 - 5 7 . 2 3 - 7 6 . 5 8
- 1 1 0 . 2 3 - 1 1 5 . 6 7 - 1 2 5 . 7 2 - 1 5 9 . 6 0 - 1 6 1 . 7 8 - 1 6 6 . 3 9 - 1 7 0 . 9 4 - 2 3 9 . 0 1 - 2 4 5 , 3 3 - 3 3 6 . 2 4 - 3 3 6 . 2 5 - 3 8 3 . 3 7 - 3 8 8 . 4 4 - 3 9 0 . 8 2
.,'7-4 252
M. u o : .
1 »
36 « i
aS 57 63 55 ••1 44
' 2 3 5= 41 21 22
12 O* 16 15 48 4 9 24 39 50 33 26 37 12 47 17 29 20
1 25 1 38 L 40 1 56 > 43 > 51 3 46 I 5 I 7 L 1 I 30 1 3 I 4 I 31 1 42 I 2 1 a I 6 1 14 1 60 1 62 I 64 I 58 2 18 I 66 2 32 2 34 2 10 2 26 2 19 2 53 2 0 2 . 27 2 52 2 45
•"OI : -^L^ ' . r ^ C T J L ^ O
• i » . ' R ( . N , - » 7 . iTPr-.s
9 9 0 5 . 8 0 2 •J5RI . I 0 2 2 4 A 2 . 6 - > ' 2167 .30 2 197" .19 2 1«55 .»0 2
' 2 1 . 9 0 1 4 H 8 . ; 3 I i l 7 . l l 2 2 6 4 . 8 4 1 7 7 7 . " 2 205.-.'5 I 190.3? ! i ' 4 . e o 174.0 0 2 149.22 I 13 9 .19 1 133 .87 I 115 .84 I 114.35 I 114 .09 1 " '4.51 1 7 6 . 3 9 I 71 .70 3 6 1 . 3 8 I 6 0 . 5 ' 1 5 7 . 4 * 1 52 .61 1 4 8 . 5 7 I 4 0 . 1 4 1 17 .09 I 3 2 . 9 0 2 3 2 . 5 8 1 3 1 . 2 9 2 8 . 4 4 1 2 8 . 2 7 1 25 .50 1 23 .36 1 23 .13 I 2 1 . 6 1 3 2 0 . 3 6 I 2 0 . 7 7 1 1 8 . 9 7 3 1 7. 30 3 17 .29 3 15 .67 7 15 .42 3 1 4 . 1 7 3
3 .20 1 6 .32 3 6 .79 I 5 .98 I 2 .10 1 1.19 3 0 .31 3
- 1 . 7 7 3 - 9 . 8 8 1 - 9 . 2 2 1
- 4 0 . 5 3 1 - 1 0 2 . 7 3 2 - 5 4 3 . 6 9 ; - 7 5 8 . 2 2 - 9 6 0 . 3 6
- 1 4 9 8 . 9 0 - 2 3 7 4 . 9 0 - 2 4 4 7 . 9 0
H. L^.C.
5 4
55 4 9 3 4
18 9
2 3
5 3 6
9 2 '16
13 16 19 a3 2 1 9 9 69 6 2
i 9 9 2 4
1 2 6 4 9 7 2 3 4 1
7 6 1 4 9 17 14
4 0 3 1 4 8 4 2 39 2 2 38 15 4 0 5 1 4 3 4 6 2 0 5 6 2 5
1 3 7
4
9 2 9 3 3 3 9 2 8
47 10 50 3 2
! 10 ! 27 ! 26 J 4 * 2 11 2 36
• I -;. ?f : s . o T o c r s
2398 .90 2174 .30
309.50 30.55 31 .37 31 .86 26 .18 13. 77 13.34 5 .79 -".79 2 . 1 9 1.90
- 1 . 0 4 - 1 . 5 4 - 1 . 7 0 - 4 . 2 9 - 5 . 14 - 9 . 3 2 - i . l 5 - 8 . C 7 - 3 . 1 2
- 1 0 . 9 6 - 14 . 8» - 1 8 . 3 4 - 2 0 . 2 5 - 2 0 . 5 7 - 2 2 . C8 - 2 4 . 3 5 - 2 8 . 2 5 - 2 9 . 4 3 - 4 0 . 9 8 - » o . 5 3 - 5 1 . 2 7 - 5 2 . 1 6 - 5 9 . 0 5 - 6 2 . 4 1 -63 . 39 - 7 4 . ' 2 - 9 1 . 8 6 - 8 5 . 9 9 - 8 6 . 2 6 - 9 9 . 8 8 - 9 1 . *4
- 1 0 4 . 7 9 - 1 0 7 . 6 0 - 1 1 5 . 8 4 - 1 4 6 . 3 4 - 1 5 7 . - . 0 - 1 9 2 . 8 4 - 1 9 8 . 0 0 - 2 1 4 . 3 1 - 2 8 9 . 3 9 - 3 2 3 . 7 4 - 3 9 3 . 9 3 - 4 16 .91 - 4 6 9 . 9 9 - 4 7 3 . 5 7
- 1 6 3 8 . 7 0 - 2 3 8 4 . 7 0 - 2 6 8 8 . 5 0 - 2 7 6 1 . 5 0 - 5 5 5 4 . 0 0 - 7 8 2 1 . 0 0 - 9 3 9 4 . 1 0 - 9 5 7 9 . 1 0
< i r . • JM.
2 ?
2
I 3 i
^ 1 I 2 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 3 I I 1 I I 3 3 3 3 I 1 I I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1
I 1 I 1 1 I I I I 2 2 2
I 2
2
2 2 2 2 2 2
LuC.
54
55 9
13 12 16 2 1 17
2 1.5 29 2 5 37 3 1 35
a 2 8 38 2 9
3 8
4 6 4 0
7 5 1 4 3 4 6 5 6 3 9 5 9 4 1 4 9 6 2 2 4 4 2 22 23 4 7 19 3 0 6 3 3 1 50 14
5 5 8 6 6 6 0 6 1 6 4 5 7 45
4 13 34 19
1 32 27 2 6
93 52 10 44 l l 36
Material Information
Material No.
1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant
151
r-NOIIM STKESS
1 9 7 9 . 1 0 14S4 .10
838.76 U0.9T 497,64 3S7.07 392.11 314.24 314.23 202.59 201.67 144.69 84,01 47.97 32.66 32.08 2a.oo 27.77 26.66 22.19 21.36 21.17 19.61 14.48 16.01 12.94 12.42 11.66 11.11 10.93 10.70 10.61 9.77 6.36 4.79 4,04 3.49 2.21 1,69 1,24 0.27
- 0 . 1 9 - 0 . 6 1 - 0 . 6 9 - 0 . 8 4 -0 ,89 -0.9C - 0 . 9 9 - 1 . 0 3 - 1 . 2 4 - 1 . 9 9 - 1 . 6 9 - 1 . 7 4 - 1 . 7 6 - 3 . 0 1 - 3 . 0 9 - 9 . 1 3 - 4 . 6 1 -9 .46 -7 .30 - 9 . 8 4
-20.99 -243-97 -341.47 -499.60
-1634.20
OROEREO
NAT. NUM. LOC.
2 4 4 2 11 2 10 2 3 6 2 3 2 2 2 7 2 94 2 9 3 2 9 2 3 4 2 32 2 19 1 31 3 36 3 12 1 30 3- 51 1 50 1 16 1 6 6 1 13 3 17 1 14 1 57 3 4 6 1 4 9 1 2 2 1 4 2 1 6 0 1 19 3 2 0 1 2 1 1 41 1 8 1 2 4 1 6 4 3 4 3 3 29 1 6 I 2 1 40 1 4 7 3 28 1 59 3 3 3 ; 3 1 62 3 2 9 3 39 1 1 I 6 I 3 9 3 37 1 6 3 1 5 1 6 3 3 38 I 7 1 61 1 48 1 58 1 23 2 26 2 13 2 4 5 2 33
STRESSES SCE
2-NCRM M STRESS Nm
2 6 8 7 . 2 0 2 2 3 8 3 . 1 0 2 128 5 . 0 0 1
9 3 1 . 0 7 1 5 8 4 . 4 8 1 5 7 2 . 8 6 2 2 5 9 . 6 1 2 2 4 3 . 4 6 1 2 2 1 . 6 9 2 1 9 9 . 6 8 2 1 6 3 . 5 1 1 1 6 3 . 3 5 t 1 4 7 . 4 7 1 1 4 4 . 8 4 1 1 3 4 . 9 2 1 1 2 2 . 4 9 1 1 0 9 . 8 9 1
6 7 . 0 0 1 3 3 . 7 0 1 4 9 . 7 2 2 4 5 . 1 1 2 3 1 . 6 0 1 2 C . 9 0 3 1 3 . 4 3 1 1 3 . 3 2 1 1 4 . 3 5 3 1 2 . 0 2 3 1 0 . 1 9 1 0 . 1 3
9 . 3 3 7 . 2 0 4 3 . 6 9 4 . 8 6 3 . 2 4 1 . 0 3 o.as 0 . 2 7 C . 2 ;
- C . O l - 0 . 0 9 - C . 3 9 - 1 . 2 4 - 1 . 4 0 — 2 . 6 2 - 2 . 8 3
- 1 1 . 1 7 - 1 6 . 2 9 - 1 5 . 7 0 - 3 0 . 9 6 - 3 6 . 2 5 - 8 2 . 9 5
- 1 1 6 . 1 5 - 1 2 5 . 3 9 - 1 3 9 . 7 4 - 1 5 4 . 7 5 - 1 6 0 . 3 3 - 1 7 3 - 6 8 - 1 7 8 - 2 6 - 1 9 1 . 8 1 - 2 5 4 - 3 0 - 5 0 7 . 3 7 - 5 3 4 . 7 0 - 5 7 5 . 2 2 - 5 9 4 . 7 C - 3 1 9 . 1 2
- 1 1 2 6 . 6 0
NARIO-II
AT-N . LOC.
3o 10 6 6 63 62 2 7 11 5 9 4 4 53 a
13 5
16 4 I
21 2 4 38 19 18 30 56 4 9 4 7
\ 12 1 51
42 L 50 » 17 ! 32 > 4 6 3 20 I 39 i 4 3 3 25 I 4 8 3 35 3 28 3 3 3 3 2 9 1 40 3 37 I 41 3 38 2 45 1 57 2 26 I 31 2 52 1 23 1 2 1 ZZ 1 3 1 6 I IS 1 7 1 14 1 60 2 54 1 a l 2 55 2 9 2 34 I 04 I 65
(SCLIC SPACERI <ITH 250
SHEAR MA STRESS NU
2 4 5 . 4 5 2 1 5 6 - 4 4 2 1 2 9 - 1 3 2
9 4 . 3 8 1 7 2 . 3 9 1 6 3 . 7 2 2 6 3 . 1 4 1 5 8 . 0 3 2 5 6 . 4 1 2 3 6 . 4 0 2 3 4 . 9 9 1 5 2 . 3 3 2 SC.37 1 4 9 . 1 3 I 4 3 . 6 6 2 4 3 . 3 5 2 4 1 . 9 1 1 3 9 . 6 5 1 3 9 . 4 3 2 3 9 . 3 6 1 3 3 . 5 9 1 3 C . 6 4 I 3 C . 2 3 1 2T..26 1 2 ( . 5 1 1 2 2 . 3 3 I 2 2 . 3 9 1 2 1 . 3 2 1 2 1 . 1 7 1 1 8 . 2 0 1 1 6 . 7 4 1 U . S 3 2 1 2 . 6 7 1
i . 0 2 1 5 . 6 3 1 3 . 8 6 3 3 . 7 5 3 2 . 3 0 : 3 . 3 4 3 . 3 1 3 . 3 0 1 . 9 7 1 . 6 0 C.60 0 . 5 3 C . 3 2 3 . 4 4 C .43 0 . 3 6 0 . 1 7 C .12 C . 0 3
- 0 . 0 5 - 1 . 7 7 - 3 . 3 1 - 5 . 9 1 - 6 . 1 1 - 7 . 7 5 - 9 . 8 1
- 2 2 . 2 9 - 2 6 . 0 6 - 2 7 . 4 1 - 3 3 . 1 1
- 1 2 4 . i 9 - L 9 4 . 1 4 - 3 9 7 . 0 5
9 . LOC.
44 45 54 66 64 18 62 11 53 .9 30 27 60 23 34 32 57 13 52 59 21 41 31 61 49 58 19 22 39 63 16 26 24
L 47 7
1 43 1 46 1 51 i 38 i 56 I 5
1 I 3 3 37 3 12 3 17 1 50 3 20 3 25 3 33 3 39 3 28 3 29 I 48 1 49
^ "• I 2 1 6 1 3 1 40 2 19 1 14 1 42 2 10 2 36 2 55
PSI SEA«.A«T XOOULUS
MAA. P R I N . STRESS
2 7 0 7 . 3 0 2 3 9 3 . 1 0 1 6 1 8 . 2 0 1 4 5 6 . 9 0 U 9 2 . 0 0
9 3 1 . 4 2 5 9 1 . 2 2 5 8 4 . 8 8 5 0 0 . 5 3 3 8 2 . 4 8 3 3 7 . 3 9 3 1 7 . 7 9 2 5 1 . 6 0 2 1 0 . 9 0 2 0 4 . 9 3 1 7 3 . 6 8 1 6 4 . 1 2 1 5 2 . 9 8 1 4 7 . 5 5 1 4 7 . 1 6 1 3 5 . 1 8 1 2 3 . 9 2 1 2 0 . 1 8
9 1 . 4 7 8 6 . 8 3 6 9 . 4 8 6 0 . 8 7 5 9 . 3 9 4 7 . 9 8 4 4 . 0 9 4 3 . 7 4 4 0 . 7 3 3 8 . 0 1 3 4 . 8 3 3 2 . 6 7 2 8 . 7 3 2 7 . 7 8 2 3 . 1 4 2 2 . 8 0 2 2 . 1 1 2 1 . 1 9 1 9 . 4 1 1 8 . 7 2 1 9 . 6 3 1 5 - 4 5 1 3 . 8 0 1 0 . 8 2 1 0 . 4 1
6 . 3 1 6 . 1 1 2 . 3 0 2 . 0 7 1 . 5 9 0 . 6 6 0 . 3 6 0 . 2 6
- 0 . 0 1 - 0 . 0 6 - 0 . 3 9 - 0 . 8 4 - 0 . 9 9 - 1 . 7 6 - 3 . 4 8 - 4 . 4 2
- 1 8 . 4 8 - 4 0 6 . 3 2
MAT. NUM.
2 2 2 2 I 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 3 I 1 1 1 3 1 I I 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 1 2 2
L O C
3 * 10 4 4 11 6 6 6 ) 6 2 2 7 9 2 94 9 3
9 9 9 32 3 4 13
8 1 9
9 16
4 1
2 1 31 3 0 2 4 98 18 5 6 42 57 4 9 4 5 4 1 12 9 1 90 6 0 * 0 39 17 14 47 22 46 19 20 64 4 3 23 2 9
6 2
4 8 3 8 39 2t 33 2 9
3 37 69 61
7 2 6 59
MEN. PRIM. STRESS
8 2 0 . 7 1 ( 1 0 . 4 8 3 4 9 . 0 9 2 9 4 . 7 9 1 7 8 . 9 9 1 7 4 . 9 7
3 9 . 3 9 2 4 . 3 4 2 0 , 3 0 1 9 . 1 0 1 4 . 5 4 1 1 . 2 9 1 1 . 0 4 1 0 . 1 3 9 . 3 0 5 . 7 9 4 . 1 3 4 . 2 9 2 . 2 7 0 . 7 4 0 . 3 2
- 0 . 6 1 - 0 . 8 8 - 0 . 9 4 - 1 . 0 4 - 1 . 2 7 - 1 . 7 9 - 1 . 8 4 - 2 . 0 3 - 2 . 1 9 - 3 . 0 8 - 9 . 4 9 - 3 . 6 0 - 4 . 3 2 - 4 . 7 9 - 7 . 6 4 - 7 . 8 8
- U . 3 9 - 1 7 . 0 2 - 2 0 . 5 1 - 2 2 . 2 0 - 2 3 . 1 9 - 2 3 . n - 2 7 . 6 8 - 3 6 . 4 2 - 3 9 . 1 9 - 4 8 . 3 9
- 1 1 0 . C 9 - 1 1 4 . 4 } - 1 2 8 . U - 1 3 9 . 7 6 - 1 9 4 . 1 4 - 1 8 3 . 2 0 - 1 7 3 . 8 7 - I U . 0 4 - 2 0 3 . 1 4 - 2 4 9 . 1 8 - 2 8 9 . 1 7 - 3 9 1 . 7 0 - 9 0 8 . 7 8 - 5 C 8 . I 9 - 5 7 8 . 8 9 - 5 9 7 . C8 - 8 2 9 . 4 3
- 1 1 2 6 . 6 0 - 1 7 6 2 . 4 0
MAT. 9 UN.
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 I 3 3 1 6
3 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1
* 1 I 1 I 2 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 2
LOC.
10 36 2 7 11 4 4 93 19 16 56 66 12 31 13 50 17
8 20 44 24 29 21 28 3 3 2 9 3 9
1 43
4 3 2 37
9 6 1 4 7 3 8 99 62 4 8 49 58 39 42 30 40 4 1 31 32 57 2 3
2 2 2
3 6
19 7
14 60 26 94 18 49 41
9 3 4 44 69 99
Material Information
Material No.
1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant
152
V-MORM STRESS
2 9 9 6 . 9 0 2 4 2 2 . 9 0
9 1 3 . 2 9 7 9 3 . 0 1 5 9 1 . 5 4 1 9 8 . 9 1 4 2 . 6 6 3 7 . 9 2 3 4 . 2 8 3 6 . 0 6 3 9 . 8 8 2 9 . 9 1 2 4 . 3 0 2 2 . 0 7 1 4 . 2 2 1 1 . 7 2
7 . 3 4 7 . 2 9 7 . 2 1 6 . 9 0 6 . 9 2 5 . 8 8 3 . 6 7 2.ia i.ac 1 . 2 9 1 . 1 4 0 . 8 6 0 . 7 0 0 . 2 3
- 0 . 2 9 - 1 . 4 2 - 1 . 4 8 - 2 . 1 7 - 2 . 7 3 - 3 . 6 1 - 4 . 1 9 - 5 . 1 9 - 5 . 2 8 - 6 . < . 3
- 1 0 . 6 3 - 1 1 . O O - 1 1 . 4 3 - 1 2 . 9 4 - 1 3 . 5 1 - 1 8 . 3 2 - 2 1 . 1 9 - 2 2 . 9 0 - 2 3 . 6 3 - 2 4 . 5 0 - 2 6 . 0 8 - 3 1 . 4 1 - 3 4 . 2 1 - 8 9 . 7 8 - 4 1 . 9 8 - 4 2 . 5 6 - 4 3 . 1 7 - 4 1 . 2 2 - 6 6 . 8 4
- 1 9 6 . 1 2 - 2 9 9 . 7 8 - 2 9 9 . 7 9 - 5 7 3 . 6 6 - 7 3 8 . 5 0
- 1 1 0 9 . 3 0 - 2 8 1 6 . 2 C
ui<
M A T . N U M .
2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 I I L 1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 3 3 1 3 3 1 i 1 3 1 1 3 1 I 3 I J
3
1 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 3 1
2
2
2 2 2
SEREC
L L I C .
1 1 4 4 2 6 5 2 3 6 2 7 2 3 3 4 2 4 3 2 5 8 4 8 57 4 7 4 9
7 1
9 0 4 5 2
6 1 6 2 2 8 2 9 6 3 3 3 3 3 6 9 3 7
3 3 8 3 0 6 4 4 3
6 4 0 2 9 3 9 4 6 2 0
3 5 9 5 1 6 3 5 6 17 19 4 1 4 2
2 1 13 14 16 12 31 19
:o 53
9 13 4 3 5 4 55
iTRESSES S C E N ;
2-KCRM !^ STRESS NUI
2 5 1 7 . 7 0 2 9 0 9 . 0 6 2 8 9 7 . 8 6 2 7 7 2 . 5 7 2 7 3 1 . 6 8 I 6 9 1 . 6 8 I 5 8 3 . 3 0 I 5 4 1 . 8 8 I 5 3 6 . 4 9 Z 4 7 7 . 2 5 1 3 7 4 . 6 2 I 3 5 8 . 6 8 I 3 2 5 . 7 3 2 3 0 3 . 2 9 1 2 5 1 . 2 7 1 2 0 0 . 9 8 2 1 3 2 . 1 5 1 1 8 0 . « C 1 1 0 1 . 3 6 1
9 9 . C 9 2 9 8 . 3 9 2 3 6 . 3 1 2 7 8 . 5 0 I 4 5 . 4 2 1 2 6 . 6 1 1 2 4 . 1 8 1 1 0 . 3 3 I
2 . 3 4 I 1 . 2 2 3 0 . 7 0 3 C . 3 7 3 0 - 1 7 3
- 0 . 1 2 - C . 6 9 - 1 . 1 6 3 - 1 . 4 2 - 1 . 5 6 - i . a i - 1 . 9 4 - 4 . J 1 - 4 , 4 2 - 4 . 3 1 - 9 . C 3
- 1 0 . 3 3 - 1 1 . 0 3 - 1 7 . 1 6 - 1 9 . 0 5 - 2 6 . 4 9 - 2 9 . C 7 - 4 7 . 0 2
- 1 1 4 . 1 0 - 1 1 9 . 6 2 - 1 9 a . 9 9 - 2 6 2 . C 4 - 2 6 6 . 9 7 - 3 1 4 - 3 2 - 3 8 4 . 3 8 - 4 0 5 . 2 2 - 4 2 4 . 2 1 - 4 7 1 . 7 5 - 5 3 5 . 9 3 - 5 4 C . 3 5 - 5 6 1 . 5 4 - 5 8 C . 5 4 - 6 4 6 . 2 5
- 3 6 4 3 . 9 0
I B I C - U I
it • *. L O C .
3 6 53 10 1 1 6 3
2 3
64 4 4
6 7
6 1 2 6 14 15 2 7 6 3 ZZ Zi 13 22 19 5 7 50 3 1 4 7 4 2 39 2 9 2 8 3 3
) 43 1 33 L 4 0 1 4 6 i 3 7 i 3 3 I 4 1 ! 2 3 i 3 1 I 4 8 j 20 3 5 6 3 17 1 4 9 2 45 3 12 1 5 8 1 39 2 32 I 5 9 I 24 1 2 1 1 6 2 I 16 1 13 I 3 1 63 2 9 1 5 2 55 I 6 6 1 4 2 34 1 1 2 5 4
( S C L i C SPACEi l l •
SHEAR STRESS
3 4 2 . 3 4 1 8 1 . 1 1 1 3 3 . 6 9 1 0 7 . 3 2 1 0 1 . 3 1 1 C 1 . 3 0
9 i . 6 6 8 5 . 5 1 3 3 . 3 0 7 7 . 9 1 7 C . 7 3 5 8 . 3 0 4 4 . o 3 4 2 . 2 2 2 3 . 3 6 1 6 . 1 2 1 1 . 0 6 1 C . 2 5
8 . 9 8 7 , 1 1 5 . 9 3 ! . 9 1 5 . 6 5 5 . 2 4 4 . 3 4 3 . 0 8 2 . 3 1 1 . 8 8 1 - 8 1 1 . 6 4 1 . 2 9 1 . 0 4 C . 7 3 C . 5 9 3 . 4 5 C . 3 4 C . I O
- 1 . 7 2 - 2 . 0 4 - 6 . 8 9
- I C . 4 4 - 1 4 . 6 7 - 2 3 . 6 5 - 2 4 . 0 3 - n . 6 6 - 2 6 . 9 4 - 3 1 . 1 8 - 3 4 . 1 8 - 3 7 . 5 6 - 2 7 . 7 7 - 4 2 . 2 9 - 4 2 . 7 7 - 4 3 . 7 7 - 5 2 . 6 1 - 5 6 . 9 4 - 5 9 . 1 3 - 5 9 . 4 3 - 4 5 - 7 0 - 3 5 . 4 3 - 3 8 - 6 3
- l i e . 5 4 - 1 2 C . 2 9 - 1 2 1 . 1 1 - 1 3 C - 7 8 - 2 C t . 9 3 - J 3 4 . 3 9
l A T . MUM.
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 1 I 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 I 3 L 3 3 3 3 3 I 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1
1 I I 1 1 2 I 1 I 2
I 1
2
1 1 2
2
I T H 2 50
uOC.
55 27 52 19 53
9 10 58 42 45 14 40 34 32 24 13 31 50
a 48 51 56 46 43
6 38
4 29 2 9 20 17 12 60 28 37 33 35
2 e2 ae 44 47 I t l
I 49
3 5
o3 33
7 22 6 1 59 36 21 39 15 26 30 4 1 11 57 13 23 54 1 4
P S I SEALANT MODULUS
M A I . P R I N -ITRESS
2 6 0 3 - 6 0 2 3 1 9 . 1 0 2 4 8 0 . 0 0
9 2 0 . 3 5 9 1 7 . 4 9 9 0 6 . 6 9 9 1 3 . 7 6 7 3 3 . 6 1 6 9 1 . 6 8 5 8 4 . 9 3 5 4 2 . 0 8 4 7 7 . 2 9 3 8 0 . 8 7 3 7 8 . 9 1 3 6 3 . 7 9 3 1 7 . 2 2 2 6 3 . 9 6 2 0 6 . 3 4 1 8 8 . 7 3 1 8 2 . 1 6 1 7 4 . 7 9 1 4 1 . 9 7 1 2 0 . 5 1
9 9 . 4 8 9 5 . 7 1 7 9 . 4 0 7 6 . 1 9 7 1 . 2 6 5 7 . 7 8 5 5 . 8 9 4 8 . 0 0 4 0 . 7 3 3 9 . 7 1 3 7 . 8 4 3 2 . 0 0 2 7 . 9 8 2 7 . 1 1
3 . 9 3 3 . 2 7 7 . 2 2 6 . 3 1 4 . 6 8 4 . 1 5 4 . 1 5 3 . 6 8 3 . 3 5 2 . 4 4 2 - 3 8 1 . 5 9 1 . 2 2 0 . 8 7 0 . 3 7
- 1 . 0 9 - 1 . . 0 - 4 . 3 8 - 5 . 8 1 - 8 . 8 4
- 1 0 . 2 2 - 1 0 . 9 1 - 1 1 . 2 3 - 1 6 . 5 1 - 1 9 . 0 1 - 4 0 . 0 9
- 2 4 3 . 1 3 - 4 8 5 . 6 4
- 1 0 9 2 . 5 0
N A T . NUM.
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1
1 1 2 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 2 I 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 3 I I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 1 1 3 1 2 2
• »
L O C
1 1 3 6 4 4 2 6 33 10 5 2 6 9
2 3
6 4 6
2 7 7
6 1 14 19 2 3 2 2 6 0 9 7 19 3 2 l l 9 8 4 2 4 1 3 0 3 9 4 0 5 0 3 4 2 4 4 7 4 9 3 1 4 8
5 1 4
13 5 9 4 3 6 1 62 2 9 4 6 28 3 8 33 3 9 3 7 23 5 1 2 0 5 6 4 9 17 6 6
8 2 1 12 16
9 5 5 5 4
M I R . P R I M . STRESS
7 4 9 . 8 9 9 5 0 . 1 3 4 7 8 . 9 9 3 1 8 . 4 8
1 8 . 6 3 1 3 . 9 4
8 . 4 2 7 . 8 4 6 . 3 2 4 . 6 7 0 . 7 7 9 . « 9 0 . 3 9
- 0 - 2 1 - 0 . 3 2 - 1 . 2 2 - 1 . J 4 - 1 . 7 2 - 2 . 3 8 - 3 . 6 9 - 4 . 5 7 - 4 . C 2 - 4 . C 3 - 6 . 7 2
- I 0 . C 3 - 1 1 . 0 6 - U , 4 2 - ( 8 . 3 2 - 2 3 . 0 3 - 2 3 . 4 ? - 2 8 . 8 1 - 3 9 . 9 1 - 3 9 . 3 3 - 4 3 . 2 2 - 5 9 . 9 1 - 6 0 . 7 2 - 4 0 . 7 6 - 6 1 . 8 2 - 4 2 . 3 9 - 6 8 . 57 - 7 1 . 7 8 - 3 6 . 3 2 - 9 9 . 1 9
- 1 0 1 . 8 1 - i c 2 . : i - 1 2 2 . 0 0 - 1 2 3 . 0 9 - 1 3 1 . 7 4 - 2 0 4 . 9 4 - 2 1 4 . 7 4 - 2 6 3 . C 6 - 2 6 9 . 3 4 - 3 0 8 . 2 1 - 3 6 0 . 1 1 - 3 8 9 . 1 0 - 4 C 8 . C 7 - 4 7 3 . 7 7 - 4 8 0 . 8 8 - 5 4 0 . 4 4 - 3 6 1 . 3 9 - 5 7 4 . 0 9 - 9 8 3 . 7 9 - 4 4 7 . 2 8 - 7 4 6 . 8 2
- 2 9 6 6 . 3 0 - 3 6 6 0 . 7 0
<Ar.
2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 I 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 I 2 1 1 1 I I 2 1 1 2 1 1 I 2 I 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 2
2
U X .
1 1 3 6 4 4
• 2 6 2 7 3 2 4 7
7 2
50 6 1 28 39 33 2 9 6 9 37
3 6 4
6 38 4 8 23 4 3 44 2 0 3 1 6 0 17 9 6 4 9 I S 2 2 12 1 4 3 9 4 0 23 3 1 52 57 58 42 13 4 1 19 24 59 10 2 1 6 2 16 53 13
a 63
5 9
6 6 4
18 34
I 4 9 55 54
Material Information
Material No.
1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant
153
T - 9 0 I B 88 s n s s s 911
1 3 0 0 7 . 0 0 2 1 1 8 0 6 . 0 0 2 a 3 2 1 . 8 0 2 3 7 7 2 - 1 0 2 3 2 6 3 , 7 0 2 1 9 0 0 . 1 0 2
9 4 7 . 1 8 2 ! 9 « , 2 6 2 5 8 7 . 7 3 2 1 3 2 . 8 7 1 1 1 8 . 9 0 1 9 1 . 6 7 1 » « . a 8 1 3 8 . 2 6 1 3 1 . 0 5 1 2 S , 2 2 1 2 4 , 0 7 1 2 0 . 7 4 1 1 9 . 4 8 1 1 6 . « 3 1 1 5 . 7 8 3
7 . 7 8 1 5 . 6 6 2 9 , 6 6 1 5 , » 2 3 5 , 2 6 5 . 1 8 : 4 . 3 7 3 . 1 7 2 - 5 9 1 .15 0 . 5 2
- 0 . 1 8 - n . 6 3 - 1 . 6 3 - 3 . 2 5 - 3 . 7 » - i » -a7 - 5 . 9 0 - 6 . 7 0 - 9 . 8 «
- 1 0 . 6 0 - 1 1 . 3 6 - n . S 5 - 1 4 . 9 4 - 1 5 . 3 4 - 1 5 - 9 0 - 1 7 . 3 3 - 1 7 - 3 9 - 2 2 . 6 0 - 2 2 . 7 6 - 2 3 . 6 1 - 3 1 . 5 2 - 3 4 . 3 8 - 4 2 . 0 5 -4 2 . 3 7 - 5 4 . 6 5 - 6 1 - 5 1 - 7 9 , 5 9 - 9 8 . 7 9
- 4 8 7 . 6 7 - 9 9 7 . 6 8
- 2 9 0 1 . 6 0 - 3 U 2 S . 90 - 1 6 0 2 . 6 0
J W ^ * %M \^
- 1 * 1 5 1 . 3 0
o i o n n
r*
8 . I O C .
1 1 « 4 5 2 3 « 2 6 2 7 10 3 « 3 2 3 1 3 0 2 « 5 7 5 8 9 7 4 8 SO 4 9 2 3
7 5 6
3 S6 6 6 2 8 6 2
1 51 1 61 1 29 i 43 I 33 1 65 i 35 1 a 1 64 1 «3 3 37 1 « 1 5 1 6 1 40 3 38 1 1 1 60 1 59 a 25 2 19 1 39 3 20 1 2 1 42 1 41 1 22 1 15 1 18 3 17 1 16 1 21 3 13 3 12 2 53 2 9 2 18 2 ; » 2 45 2 55
S n z S S B SC78ARX
: - 9 0 8 a a AT. STB u s 8on .
1 8 5 2 5 . 9 0 2 8 * 4 1 . 6 0 2 3 8 7 0 . 0 0 2 3 5 6 3 . 7 0 2 2 2 7 3 . 7 0 2 2 1 1 1 . 1 0 2 1 2 7 8 . 9 0 2
9 3 9 . 1 7 1 6 0 5 . 3 5 1 4 6 7 . 3 9 2 4 2 2 . 8 4 2 3 1 0 . 6 8 2 2 8 0 . 3 2 1 2 3 3 . 0 4 1 177 .03 1 1 6 3 . 2 9 1 148 .12 1 140 .82 1 101 .79 1
9 8 . 1 9 1 9 6 . 2 0 1 8 8 . 1 2 1 6 7 . 6 4 1 5 3 . 5 3 1 4 5 . 2 3 1 4 2 . 9 8 1 3 1 . 1 7 1 1 6 . 7 7 1
8 .68 3 4 . 2 6 3 4 , 2 9 3 2 , 7 0 3 2 .45 3 2 . 3 1 3 2 . 1 3 3
- 0 . 6 5 3 - 5 . £ 6 1 - 6 . 7 6 3 - 7 . 9 8 3 - 8 - 4 3 1 - 8 - 9 1 3
- 1 3 . 2 0 1 - 1 3 . 4 4 3 - 1 5 - 0 4 1 - 1 8 . 6 9 1 - 1 9 . 3 * 3 - 3 2 - 4 0 1 - 3 5 . 6 7 1 - 3 8 . 7 7 1 - 4 1 - 7 2 1 - 4 3 . 2 9 3 - 4 4 . 7 3 1 - 9 9 . 6 9 1 - 9 0 . 6 3 1 - 9 9 . 1 8 2
- 1 5 5 . 2 3 1 - 1 9 6 . 0 1 1 - 1 9 7 . 0 0 1 - 2 6 0 . 9 6 2 - 3 5 * . 7 8 1 - 6 4 5 . 6 9 1 - 9 3 2 . 5 6 1
- 2 9 2 9 . 3 0 2 - 3 2 2 7 . 4 0 2 - 3 2 8 3 - 7 0 2
- 1 4 3 5 2 - 0 0 2
9-17
LOC.
38 10 S3 11
*« 2 7 26
1
« i a 19 32
5 6 6 5 7 6 0 6 3 5 0 6 1 4 7 1« 15 6 2 42 2 2 6 « 3 0 39 5 6 4 6 5 1 2 9 4 3 2 8 35 33 4 0 25 20 59 3 7 6 5 38 2 3 41 17 48 3 1
a 4 9 12 5 8
7 2 * 4 5 2 1 16 13 52
6 3 2 9
55 34 5 4
<S0L2D sfACzi ) w i r a 250
s a i u 3 T H S 3
6 1 8 . 7 9 6 0 1 , 3 1 572 -59 4 9 6 . 0 3 4 9 8 . 0 2 350 .45 2 5 3 . 1 7 2 * 9 . 5 2 229 .96 1 9 9 . 7 * 19« ,02 109.39
99 ,86 90 .66 86 .38 6 5 . 8 1 59 .83 59 .66 53 ,53 5 0 . 47 50 .«2 33 .96 31 .50 29 .81 2 8 . * 7 28 .46 28 .03 27 .92 25 .10 2 « . 9 1 24 .50 2 3 . 4 7 22-73 19.67 17 .01
7 .52 7 .41 6 .97 5 .95 5 .86 4 .39 2-67 2-15 1,65 3.49
- 0 - 2 3 - 1 - 1 5 - 4 - 2 3 - 5 - 0 7 - 8 . 1 9
- 1 0 . 7 * - 1 5 . 3 8 - 2 6 . 3 6 - 3 2 - 3 9 - 3 2 - 5 6 - 3 5 - 9 6 - 5 7 . 9 0 - 5 8 - 6 1 - 7 9 . 5 1 - 9 3 - 7 6 - 9 9 - 7 1
- 1 3 0 - 4 3 - 2 0 4 . 5 7 - 4 0 3 . 2 6 - 6 7 1 . 2 9 - 9 2 9 . 6 7
a i T . 108.
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 3
" 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1
2 2 1
bOC.
2 7 45 52 53
9 19 3« 32 26 10 18 1 * 5 8 31 42
8 6 4 2
40 2 * 60
1 62 51 46 54 43
3 5
64 64 SO 38
7 23 30 20 29 17 12 37 28 33 33 48 14 63 65 47 6 1 59 49 21 22 15 55 39 13 57 41 23 44 54 36 11
r s z aiLxn eoooios
aAZ. P 8 I J . STt lSS
1 *547 .00 13079 .00 11811.00
8 * 4 7 . 3 0 4097 .00 392&.20 3 2 8 9 . 9 0 2 * 9 2 . 10
940 .22 7 3 1 . 11 616 .93 6 1 1 . 1 3 6 1 0 . 5 9 «7a.S2 2 8 2 . 4 7 2 3 9 . 6 7 225 .66 172 .38 169 .64 154 .47 1 * 8 . 2 * 1 « * , 7 0 133 ,76 115 .59 109 ,81 104 ,90 104 .69 102 .96
9 9 . 1 7 9 7 . 9 1 7 9 . 5 9 7 8 . 5 9 6 0 . 7 7 5 7 . 18 3 3 . 0 2 49 -78 • 2 . 7 6 4 0 . 4 8 3 3 . 4 3 33- 19 3 0 . 4 * 3 0 . 2 1 28 -22 20-06
8 .89 8 .70 7-70 6.S2 3 . 7 * 3 .30 2 .23 2-19 2 .13 1.15
- 2 . 3 1 - 2 . 6 0 - 4 . 2 7
- 1 7 - 9 * - 1 9 . 4 7 - 4 0 . 2 6 - 4 2 - 8 3 - 5 1 . 5 0 - 5 4 . 6 *
- 3 8 6 . 18 - 3 2 2 7 . 1 0 - 3 4 1 2 - 0 0
I I I . 108-
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 1 1 3 1 3 2 3 3 3 3 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 2
U K .
3 6 11
«* 10 5 3 S3 2 6 2 7
1 33 19
* 3 6 18
5 6 6 5 7 3 1 6 0 1 * 6 3 5 0 2 3 3 0 • 2 5 8 2 * 6 1 * T 13 6 2 4 1 3 9 2 2 6 *
8 • 0 5 6 4 6 5 1 • 3 * 9 * 8
7 2 9
3 3 8 2 8 5 9
6 3 5 6 5 33 • 5 2 5 3 7 2 0 1 7
2 13 12 2 1 16
9 55 5 *
t Z I . 7 8 1 1 -S T 8 B 8
3 7 3 0 . 3 0 3 * 9 1 . 3 0 3 2 M . 3 0 1 2 * 8 . 2 0 1119-10
961 .84 167. JO
30-52 30 .07 19.79 3 .04 3 . 9 0 1-21
- 0 . 2 8 - 1 . 4 3 - 3 . 0 2 - 3 - 3 7 - 3 . 7 5 - 6 - 6 9 - 8 . J S
- R ) . 0 4 - 1 0 . 6 4 - 1 1 . 7 1 - 1 2 . * 0 - l * . 8 7 - 1 6 . 0 2 - n - 9 2 - 3 0 . 3 4 - 2 1 . 0 4 - 2 3 . 9 1 - 2 1 . 7 4 - 2 5 . * 0 - 2 7 . 1 2 - 3 1 . 7 * - 3 3 . 4 0 - « 3 . 4 7 - 4 3 - 7 8 • 4 3 . 8 7 - 9 1 . n - 5 8 - 2 6 - 4 1 . 3 2 - 6 3 . 3 2 - 7 5 . 1 7 - 7 9 . 3 * - 3 4 . 2 3 - 9 7 . 2 3
- 1 0 3 . J 2 - 1 0 3 . 6 * - 1 1 1 . 3 7 - 1 2 0 . 9 0 - 1 2 9 - 3 6 - 1 6 5 - 3 9 - 1 9 4 . C 2 - 2 3 9 . 9 8 - 2 3 6 - 0 3 - 3 3 4 - 19 - 3 6 4 . 7 8 - 5 * 3 . 8 6 - 6 * 6 - 6 5 - 9 3 5 . 7 0
- 2 9 1 2 . 7 0 - 2 9 3 1 . 3 0 - 3 3 0 0 . 3 0 - 1 7 0 2 . 9 0
- 1 * 1 5 1 . 9 0 - 1 * 3 6 7 . 3 0
BAZ-m .
2 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 J 1 1 1 1 1 1
. 2 1 3 1 3 1 1 3 3 3 2 3 3
U K .
3 6 11 • 4 2 4 2 7 10 3 3 3 0 * 7 9 4 6 6 6 1 3 8 3 5 3 3 3 9 6 3 5 7 6 2
S 1 7
* 6 *
1 6 9 5 6 6 0 2S 3 0 4 6 3 1 • 3 5 9 3 8 • 8 3 3 17 I S 4 9 • 0 3 9
7 3 1 4 3
8 12 14 2 * 5 8 * 1 3 3 3 1 16 19 13 5 2
6 S3
3 2
18 9
] * 45 55 S *
Matprial Information
Material No.
1 2 3
Material Type
Glass Aluminum Sealant