Upload
dylan-black
View
212
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The State of the Severn RiverJune, 2015
Andrew C. Muller, PhD.Associate Professor
Oceanography DepartmentUnited States Naval Academy
Introduction
• In order to understand the current state of the Severn River and where it may be headed in the near future, we must understand the physical processes that govern the river and past conditions
Tides in the Chesapeake Bay• Chesapeake Bay is a partially
mixed estuary. Density stratification will vary with Spring-Neap cycle and river discharge.
• The tide in the Bay is mixed, mainly semidiurnal, and it loses energy through turbulent mixing in the bottom boundary layer as it propagates northward
• Range of tide is approx. 3 feet at mouth of Bay,
• 1 foot at AnnapolisAvg Depth: 21 ftMax Depth: 174 ft
Salinity and Tidal Currents
Chesapeake Bay Hypoxia
Spatial Variability vs. Temporal Variability
• In any monitoring program or research endeavor to understand the bio-physical processes that dominate ecological systems we face the spatio-temporal dilemma, we can be
• Spatial intensive – lower temporal resolution– or
• Temporal intensive – lower spatial resolution• May loose vertical dimension
• But, water quality parameters exist in the spatiotemporal domain
Resolving the Spatio-Temporal dilemma
• HydroLab DS 5• REMUS 100
• NOAA Annapolis Buoy
Monitoring Locations
Severn River D.O. 2010
Severn River 2011
REMUS 100Remote Autonomous Environmental Unit sPhysical Specs:Manufacturer: HydroidBody Type: Torpedo Size (LxWxH): 1.60m x 0.19m x 0.19m Body Size (LxWxH): 1.60m x 0.19m x 0.19m Hull Material: Aluminum Weight: 37.00kg Maximum Depth: 100.00 m Self-Righting: Yes Obstacle Avoidance: No Endurance (nominal load): 22 hours -
Mission: Round Bay, Severn River hypoxia
Mission: Round Bay, Severn River hypoxia (Aug 13, 2010)
Mission: Round Bay, Severn River hypoxia (Aug. 13, 2010)
Mission: Severn RiverJune,15 2011- Round Bay to College Creek
RBNUSNA
WT 7.1
REMUS (6-8 AM) SRK weekly monitoring (8 AM – 2 PM)
Hypoxic Squeezing
𝐻𝑆𝐼=Δ𝐷𝑜
depth avg . Do
Hypoxic Squeeze Index
Percent below 2 mg/l
0 20 40 60 80
HV
I
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Rsqrd=.72
Station
HS
I
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
Severn River Hypoxic Squeezing
• CS
SRO ASQ SR7CHS SR5WMS SLTBRW
Route 50 bridgeBottom Do, mg/l
WT 7.1
Feb Mar Apr MayJun Jly AugSep Oct NovDec0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
Mean2014
Increasing the importance and relevance of buoy data and AUVs, building the network
• Hindcasting water quality parameters
What if you could extract buoy information and cat it throughout the rest of a small tributary.
Theoretical Approach: Slice up the tributary into 1 meter sections.Consider well mixed within a section; stratification occurs between sections.As a result conservative properties may be modeled as Gaussian distribution.
24.5
25
25.5
26
26.5
27
27.5
28
28.5
29
29.5
Severn River Temp Gaussian
.3 Meters1 Meter2 Meter3 Meter4 Meter5 Meter6 Meter7 Meter8 Meter9 Meter10 Meter11 Meter12 Meter13 Meter
SR0 SR1 SR2 SR3 RBS SR5 RBN SR6 SR7Station
Tem
pera
ture
(C )
9
9.5
10
10.5
11
11.5
12
12.5
13
13.5
Severn River Salinity Gaussian
1 Meter2 Meter3 Meter4 Meter5 Meter6 Meter7 Meter8 Meter9 Meter10 Meter11 Meter12 Meter13 Meter
SR0 SR1 SR2 SR3 RBS SR5 RBN SR6 SR7Station
Salin
ity
9
9.5
10
10.5
11
11.5
12
12.5
13
13.5
Severn River Salinity Gaussian
1 Meter2 Meter3 Meter4 Meter5 Meter6 Meter7 Meter8 Meter9 Meter10 Meter11 Meter12 Meter13 Meter
SR0 SR1 SR2 SR3 RBS SR5 RBN SR6 SR7Station
Salin
ity
25
25.5
26
26.5
27
27.5
28
28.5
29
29.5
30
1 August 2012Predicted vs. Actual Temperature
Surface Predicted2 Meter Predicted4 Meter Predicted6 Meter PredictedSurface Actual2 Meter Actual4 Meter Actual6 Meter Actual
SR0 SR1 SR2 SR3 RBS SR5 RBN SR6 SR7 Station
Temperature (C)
8.5
9.5
10.5
11.5
12.5
13.5
1 August 2012Predicted vs. Actual Salinity
Surface Predicted2 Meter Predicted4 Meter Predicted6 Meter PredictedSurface Actual2 Meter Actual4 Meter Actual6 Meter Actual
SR0 SR1 SR2 SR3 RBS SR5 RBN SR6 SR7 Station
Salinity
2012 Severn River Forecasts
Tem
p
40
50
60
70
80
90
The Future
USNA-NECOS ConceptSecure, Adhoc, Semi-Mobile, Environmental Monitoring Network
REMUS-100
Autonomous Underwater
Vehicles (AUVs)*
Drifting Buoys*
Moored Buoys*
Buoy Array
Fixed Meteorological
Stations*
Benthic Chambers
Coastal Kayaks w/ Handheld In Situ Probes*
Central Hub (Hendrix)
Santee Basin Severn River
* Existing USNA asset
Naval Estuarine and Coastal Ocean Observation System
Conclusion• It is important to understand the complete system when attempting to
make important policy decisions regarding restoration.• Physics dominates and controls the system, no coriolis and no sloshing of
water in and out by tides,• Hypoxia and anoxia are locally controlled (it’s the creeks!!!)• Susquehanna River is NOT the main polluter to Severn and South Rivers.• Severn is not getting worse, but its not getting better either.• Need more studies on restoration effectiveness, including BAAs, long-term
studies and downstream measurements
• Use of technology like REMUS, CONMONS, and a more complete observing system will allow for better modeling, and therefore better policy decisions. Initial hindcasting results promising