59
The Standard 6 ASW Process: What Teachers Need to Know Now

The Standard 6 ASW Process: What Teachers Need to Know …hcpshealthpe.wikispaces.com/file/view/ASWTeacherSI... · Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership. Standard II: Teachers

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The Standard 6

ASW Process:

What Teachers

Need to Know Now

Standard I: Teachers demonstrate leadership.

Standard II: Teachers establish a respectful environment for a diverse population of students.

Standard III: Teachers know the content they teach.

Standard IV: Teachers facilitate learning for their students.

Standard V: Teachers reflect on their practice.

Standard VI: Teachers contribute to the academic success of students.

NC Professional Teaching Standards

5 Rating Categories

1 6 5 4 3 2 Demonstrate Leadership

Establish Environment

Know Content

Facilitate Learning

Reflect on Practice

Contribute to Academic

Success

3 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated

Developing

Proficient

Accomplished

Distinguished

Does Not Meet Expected Growth

Meets Expected Growth

Exceeds Expected Growth

Overview of Standard 6

NC Educator Evaluation System

Overview of Standard 6

Contribute to Academic

Success

End of Grade (EOG) or End of Course (EOC) tests

6 NC Final Exams

6 Career Technical Education Assessment

6 Analysis of Student Work

K-3 Checkpoints 6

6

ASW

Reality vs. Rumor Activity

(Process) ASWRealityNRumorsHandout.FINAL.Process.pdf

Analysis of Student Work

6 Analysis of Student Work

Contribute to Academic

Success

In 2014-2015, ASW is the Standard 6 measure for teachers in Advanced Placement, Arts Education, Healthful Living, International Baccalaureate, and World Languages. Growth is based on student work submitted by teachers and rated by content experts in a “blind review” process.

K-8 Healthful Living

Healthful Living teachers are required to participate if

• have at least 45 minutes per week scheduled with students

High School

A teacher is required to participate if:

• 60% of the teacher’s classes are in ASW subject areas*

*locally developed electives that do not follow the standards in the NC

Standard Course of Study are not included in the ASW process unless the district chooses to “opt in”

The ASW Process

Guidance Chart for Healthful Living

Health Education

Only

Physical Education

Only

Healthful Living (Health Education & Physical Education)

Include: 1 Timelapse Artifact representing each of the 5 strands of Health Education.

Include: 1 Timelapse Artifact representing each of the 4 strands of Physical Education + 1 additional Timelapse Artifact representing any of the four Physical Education strands.

Include: •1 Timelapse Artifact from the group of MEH, NPA, or ATOD strands (peach group); •1 Timelapse Artifact from the group of PCH or ICR strands (orange group); •1 Timelapse Artifact from the MS or MC strand (green group); •1 Timelapse Artifact from the HF or PR strand (blue group); and •1 additional Timelapse Artifact representing any of the 9 strands of Health and Physical Education.

Health Physical Education Health Physical Education

Mental & Emotional Health (MEH)

Motor Skills (MS) Mental & Emotional Health (MEH)

Motor Skills (MS)

Personal & Consumer Health (PCH)

Movement Concepts (MS)

Nutrition & Physical Activity (NPA)

Movement Concepts (MS)

Interpersonal Communications & Relationships (ICR)

Health-Related Fitness (HF)

Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs (ATOD)

Health-Related Fitness (HF)

Nutrition & Physical Activity (NPA)

Personal/Social Responsibility (PR)

Personal & Consumer Health (PCH)

Personal/Social Responsibility (PR)

Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drugs

Interpersonal Communications & Relationships (ICR)

Items needed to compile a Timelapse Artifact (TA):

• A specific objective measured over 2 distinct points in time

• Work Sample Options: Student or Whole Class

• Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting

• 2 work samples

• Context

Overview of the ASW Process

Work Samples: Option 1 – Student Work Samples

Collect and keep 2 work samples: • for each class member • for the objective • at 2 separate points in time

Overview of the ASW Process

Examples

• Middle School example for an individual CPR.

Objective: Healthful Living – Health Education 8.PCH.4.2 Demonstrate basic CPR techniques and procedures on a mannequin and pass a Red Cross or American Heart Association approved test of CPR skills.

Time Frame: Before Instruction

Method of Harvest: Video

Work Sample Option: Student

These artifacts are not intended to illustrate category ratings: does not meet, meets or exceeds expected growth.

Healthful Living:

Health Timelapse Artifact

If you would like to view the video clip, please click this link: http://bit.ly/mod6vid1

Healthful Living:

Health Timelapse Artifact

Objective: Healthful Living – Health Ed. 8.PCH.4.2 Demonstrate basic CPR techniques and procedures on a mannequin and pass a Red Cross or American Heart Association approved test of CPR skills.

Time Frame: 3 class days since point #1

Method of Harvest: Video

Work Sample Option: Student These artifacts are not intended to illustrate category ratings: does not meet, meets or exceeds expected growth.

If you would like to view the video clip, please click this link: http://bit.ly/mod6vid2

Work Samples: Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples

2 work samples that represent the entire class • for the objective • at 2 separate points in time

Overview of the ASW Process

Healthful Living:

Health Timelapse Artifact

Objective: Healthful Living – Physical Education PE.7.HF.3.1 Use the gender- and age-related health-related physical fitness standards defined by an approved fitness assessment to self evaluate fitness levels.

Time Frame: Pre Test – Beginning of Semester

Method of Harvest: Excel Spreadsheet

Work Sample Option: Whole Class

These artifacts are not intended to illustrate category ratings: does not meet, meets or exceeds expected growth.

Objective: Healthful Living – Physical Education PE.7.HF.3.1 Use the gender- and age-related health-related physical fitness standards defined by an approved fitness assessment to self evaluate fitness levels.

Time Frame: Post Test – End of Semester

Method of Harvest: Excel Spreadsheet

Work Sample Option: Whole Class These artifacts are not intended to illustrate category ratings: does not meet, meets or exceeds expected growth.

Healthful Living:

Health Timelapse Artifact

Unpacking Objectives

Unpacking Objectives PE.7.MS.1.3

Execute basic offensive and defensive strategies for an invasion game or net/wall activity

Circle verbs that represent what students are to do.

Underline the nouns or noun phrases the represent teachable concepts.

Selecting Timelapse Artifact

PE.7.MS.1.3

Execute basic offensive and defensive strategies for an invasion game or net/wall activity

Is this objective observable and measurable at 2 points in time?

How could work samples for this objective be captured by a collection method?

http://www.ncpublicschools.org/acre/standards/support-tools/#unhealth

Unpacking Objectives

• 7.MEH.1.2 Infer the potential outcome from impulsive

behaviors. Circle verbs that represent what students are to do. Underline the nouns or noun phrases the represent

teachable concepts.

Selecting Timelapse Artifact

7.MEH.1.2

Infer the potential outcome from impulsive behaviors.

Is this objective observable and measurable at 2 points in time?

How could work samples for this objective be captured by a collection method?

http://www.ncpublicschools.org/acre/standards/support-tools/#unhealth

ASW Tools

Submitting the timelapse artifact

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples

1

2

1

2

1

2

1 Timelapse

Artifact

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples

If a student work sample is unavailable, that student will be reshuffled to create another sampling.

TA 1

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples

Context for 2nd work sample

How does this artifact

show where the student

is in relation to the

chosen clarifying

objective?

2

2

2

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples

Be sure to keep the Whole Class Work Samples If the composition of your class changes, do not worry, submit your two work samples.

#2

Work Sample

1

Work Sample

2

1 Timelapse

Artifact

Overview of the ASW Process

Overview of the ASW Process

Method(s) or tool(s) for collecting:

Timelapse Artifact Option 2 – Whole Class Work Samples

Whole Class Work

Sample 1

Whole Class Work

Sample 2

1 Timelapse Artifact

Overview of the ASW Process

Timelapse Artifacts will be uploaded to the online platform.

TA 3 Student

TA 4 Student

TA 5 Whole Class

TA 1 Student

TA 2 Whole Class

Overview of the ASW Process

Principal’s Input

Ensure Teacher Participation

Principal meets with the teacher to ensure that the 5 objectives chosen use the parameters in the Strands & Standards Guidance Chart Some examples of meetings: • PDPs • teacher meetings

Principal’s Input

The Principal is notified when a reshuffle is used by a teacher.

TA 1

Principal’s Input

Timelapse Artifact Option 1 – Student Work Samples

Context for 1st work sample

How does this artifact

show where the student

is in relation to the

chosen clarifying

objective?

1

1

1

Overview of the ASW Process

Blind Review: The Evidence Collection will be reviewed by 2 content area specialists.

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

Overview of the ASW Process

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

Blind Review: The platform sends the evidence collection to two reviewers who have been matched to the teacher because of their similar content area expertise.

Overview of the ASW Process

Category Rating: Meets Expected Growth

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

Blind Review: If the category ratings from each reviewer are the same, then the review process is complete and the Standard 6 rating will be posted for that year.

Meets Expected Growth

Overview of the ASW Process

Reviewer #1 Reviewer #2

Blind Review: If the category ratings from the two reviewers are not the same, the Evidence Collection is automatically sent to a 3rd reviewer for an additional review to get a rating for that year.

Exceeds Expected Growth

Reviewer #3

Meets Expected Growth

Overview of the ASW Process

2-Step ASW Process Review: Evidence Collection Checklist

ASW Quality Rubric

Overview of the ASW Process

• D = Does Not Meet Expected Growth

• M = Meets Expected Growth

• E = Exceeds Expected Growth

Transfer your rating for each TA from the quality rubric to the table below:

Use this table to determine the overall rating for the evidence collection

Overall Rating for the entire Evidence Collection

Does Not Meet Expected Growth Meets Expected Growth Exceeds Expected Growth

Evidence Collection Rating Form:

TA 1 TA 2 TA 3 TA 4 TA 5

Does Not Meet Meets Exceeds

D D D D D M M M M M E E E E E

D D D D E M M M M E M E E E E

D D D D M D M M M M M M E E E

D D D E E M M M E E D E E E E

D D D M E D D M M M D M E E E

D D D M M D M M M E D D E E E

D D M M E

D D M E E

D M M E E

Overview of the ASW Process

5 Rating Categories

1 6 5 4 3 2 Demonstrate Leadership

Establish Environment

Know Content

Facilitate Learning

Reflect on Practice

Contribute to

Academic Success

3 Rating Categories Not Demonstrated

Developing

Proficient

Accomplished

Distinguished

Overview of Standard 6

NC Educator Evaluation System

An educator receives an effectiveness status only after he or she has 3 years of data on Standard 6 A 3-year rolling average of growth data from Standard 6 is used as part of determining overall status

3-Year Rolling Average

6 6 6

Year 1

Year 2

Year 3

Standard Standard Standard

6 6

Contribute to Academic

Success

6 Year 1

2014-2015 Does Not Meet

Expected Growth

Year 2 2015-2016

Meets Expected Growth

Year 3 2016-2017

Meets Expected Growth

Standard Standard Standard

Mr. NC’s 3-year rolling average of growth data: 2014-15 Does Not Meet (Year 1) 2015-16 Meets (Year 2) + 2016-17 Meets (Year 3)

Mr. NC’s 3-year rolling average for 2014-2017 Meets Expected Growth

Demonstration of 3-Year Rolling

Average for 2014-2017

Effectiveness Status

for 2016 - 2017 Effective

2016 - 2017 Developing Proficient Accomplished Distinguished

Standard 1 Demonstrate

leadership

Standard 2 Establish Environment

Standard 3 Know Content

Standard 4 Facilitate Learning

Standard 5 Reflect on Practice

Standard 6 Three year rolling

average

X

X

X

X

X 3 year rolling average for 2014 – 2017

Meets Expected Growth

• Online Training Modules • Important Forms • Frequently Asked Questions

Visit the Wiki here: http://ncasw.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/ http://hcpshealthpe.wikispaces.com/August+20%2C+2014+PD

ASW Wikispace

ASW Teacher Session

Post Assesment

Answers

1. ASW is an evidence collection process to populate Standard 6 for educators teaching in grades/subjects where there is no End of Grade (EOG) assessment, End of Course (EOC) assessment, NC Final Exam, Career Technical Education (CTE) assessment, or K-3Checkpoint.

Reality

Reality or Rumor

2. Standard 6 is determined using 3 years of growth data, so teachers using the ASW process

will receive their first Status (Highly Effective, Effective, or In Need of Improvement) that

includes ratings from Standards 1 – 6 in Fall 2017. For educators implementing the ASW process

in 2014-2015, growth will be calculated using the best two of three years data.

Reality

Reality or Rumor

3. In cases where ninjas break into school buildings and steal evidence intended for Timelapse Artifacts, teachers should fill out DPI Form NCC-1701 and submit, in triplicate, to DPI. Please note, Form NCC-1701 is ninja-specific and does not cover evidence theft by any other entity including circus animals, clowns, or chupacabras.

Rumor

Reality or Rumor

4. An ASW evidence collection is comprised of 5 Timelapse Artifacts, which are based on the 5

classes selected by the online platform, along with 5 objectives chosen by the teacher using the Strands & Standards Guidance Charts.

Reality

Reality or Rumor

5. Teachers should only collect evidence in the classes chosen by the online platform, and only for the objectives selected by the teacher.

Reality

Reality or Rumor

6. For individual Timelapse Artifacts, the online platform will select three students from each class. Teachers will have the ability to reshuffle students selected by the online platform if the teacher is missing work for that student or does not have a media release form.

Reality

Reality or Rumor

7. Teachers will include narrative context for each Timelapse Artifact including information on the frequency and duration of their classes, and how the evidence demonstrates growth in the classroom.

Reality

Reality or Rumor

8. Evidence Collections should be submitted for review in the online platform. Files for each

piece of evidence can only be 10MB in size and should be saved in common file formats

accessible on most computers.

Reality

Reality or Rumor

9. Upon complete submission of an Evidence Collection, PowerSchool will reward teachers with a cupcake of their choice. (Subject to 3D printer availability in your district)

Rumor

Reality or Rumor

10. Evidence Collections will be reviewed by two content area experts trained by DPI. If the

reviews from those experts do not match, the Evidence Collection will be reviewed by a third

content area expert.

Reality