Upload
kiayada-gutierrez
View
31
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Small Arms Production Base. William Sanville Project Manager Maneuver Ammunition Systems (PM-MAS). Government Small Caliber Ammo Production Base. Korean War 6 Plants Lake City Ordinance Plant St. Louis Ordinance Plant Twin Cities Ordinance Plant Frankford Arsenal New Haven PEP - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The Small Arms Production Base
The Small Arms Production Base
William SanvilleProject Manager
Maneuver Ammunition Systems(PM-MAS)
Government Small Caliber Ammo Production Base
Government Small Caliber Ammo Production Base
WW II 16 PlantsLake City Ordinance Plant – Remington Arms
Twin Cities Ordinance Plant – Federal Cartridge Co.
St. Louis Ordinance Plant – Western Cartridge Co.
Frankford Arsenal – Government
Denver Ordinance Plant –
Bridgeport PEP – Remington Arms
New Haven PEP – Winchester Western
Des Moines Ordinance –
Utah Ordinance –
Eau Claire Ordinance –
East Alton Ordinance –
Kings Mills Ordinance –
Evansville Ordinance –
Milwaukee Ordinance –
Allegany Ordinance –
Lowell Ordinance –
Korean War 6 PlantsLake City Ordinance Plant
St. Louis Ordinance Plant
Twin Cities Ordinance Plant
Frankford Arsenal
New Haven PEP
Bridgeport PEP
Viet Nam 5 PlantsLake City Army Ammunition Plant
Twin Cities Army Ammunition Plant
Frankford Arsenal
New Haven PEP
Bridgeport PEP
Today 1 Plant Lake City Army Ammunition Plant
Peak Output 1.2B/yr
1.877B/mo1.877B/mo 100M/mo100M/mo
PEAK OUTPUT WW IICal. 30 900M/moCal.30 carbine 227M/moCal.45 ball 250M/moCal. 50 500M/mo 1877M/mo
GOCO Production HistoryGOCO Production History
Y e a rs41
4447
5053
5659
6265
6871
7477
8083
8689
9295
98'01
'04'07
'10
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
KOREA1950-1953
VIETNAM1966-1975
WWII1941-1945
Remington ArmsOlin
ATK
15Plants
6Plants
5Plants
1Plant
USA
Note: Peak Production all 16 plants approx. 1.8 B rds/ month
Small Cal Base CapacitySmall Cal Base Capacity
BaseCapacity1.550B
0
1.5
0.3
0.6
0.9
1.2
Lake City
Other Sources(Built to US TDP) Non-TDP Sources*
* Emergency Capacity
•Sources Available
• GOCO Primary Producer at Current 1.2B Capacity
• Identified 350M Commercial Capacity of US Spec Ammo
• Identified 500M Additional Sources NATO and Similar Capacity
•Sources Available
• GOCO Primary Producer at Current 1.2B Capacity
• Identified 350M Commercial Capacity of US Spec Ammo
• Identified 500M Additional Sources NATO and Similar Capacity
Ctg
s in
B
GOCO
ARMY TRAINING AMMUNITION REQUIREMENTS / FUNDING TRENDS
ARMY TRAINING AMMUNITION REQUIREMENTS / FUNDING TRENDS
•CALS GROWTH: 1995 – 30 full
2001 – 73 full, 29 monitor
Current – 110 full, 33 monitor
•CALS GROWTH: 1995 – 30 full
2001 – 73 full, 29 monitor
Current – 110 full, 33 monitor
$1.5B
FY88 FY90 FY95 FY05FY00
$.5B
$1.0B
FY10
$1.56B FY88 RQMT
$1.088BFY11
$2.0B
$2.245BFY06 RQMT
$2.467B FY11
FY07 RQMT
$2.295B
MAJOR COST DRIVERS:
• Modernization
• Stockpile depleted
• Force structure changes
• STRAC / POI changes
• Available Inventory
$2.5B
Total Training Ammo Rqmt (Unconstrained)
Validated Rqmt (Critical)
Funding Level (Yr of Execution
Ammo Used
Inventory or funding
required to fill gap.
SMALL CAL AMMO SCENARIOSSMALL CAL AMMO SCENARIOS
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1600000
1800000
2000000
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11
#CT
GS
(K
)
FUNDED QTY (K) GOCO FUNDED PRODUCTIONGOCO PROD CAP STATED GOAL (Army Req + Other Services)POTENTIAL SURGE REQ.
POM FUNDING (ALL SERVICES)
DESIRED SURGE CAPABILITYGOAL ALL SERVICES
GOCO PLANNING CAPACITY
ALT. SOURCEUNFUNDED
REQUIREMENTS
Small Cal Base RisksSmall Cal Base Risks
• Age– Most GOCO plant buildings, part of equipment and infrastructure date to WW II
• Single Point Risks– TNR reactor– DISRUPTION OF PRIMER PRODUCTION LONGER THAN 3 WEEKS– Most efficient operation drives many sole/single source
• Unique TDP– Ammo planned for use in a wide variety of weapons– Ammo required to function all over world– Changes in weapons platforms offer opportunity to adjust TDP for more affordable production
• Preservation of current investment – Mechanism needed to preserve current capacity when requirements go down in future – Funding to layaway and maintain current capacity will be needed or base will shrink once again – Each time it becomes more difficult to bring back
• Future Planning– Need to define production line needs to deal with fluctuating requirements– A long term plan needs to be developed for flexible and sustainable small caliber production
base
Industrial Base ActionsIndustrial Base Actions
• Industrial Base– LCAAP Modernization
• Update production equipment• Automate primer manufacture • Increase automatic inspection systems• Capacity expanded to 1.5B per year
– Second Source• Establishes ready access to elements of the commercial base through
a previously contracted agent • Capacity established at 300M to 500M per year
– TDP Improvements – reduce unnecessary production costs• Tolerance study bullet and case• Metallurgical requirement evaluation.• Ignition train review (alternate propellant study)