1
The Safest Place to go on UC Berkeley’s Campus during the 2012 Apocalypse Clients: on UC Berkeley ’s Campus -Network Analysis based on someone centrally located, at the Sather Tower Campenile Problem: 2012 Apocalypse -No access to public utilities, such as water and electricity -Natural Disasters including flooding and earthquakes -High crime: looting, mobs, etc. Two Methods: 1. Suitability Analysis to find the location with the most favorable conditions 2. Network Analysis to find the accessible locations Conclusions The Faculty Club, Hilgard/Giannini Hall, the open area east of Memorial Glade, and Dwinell , most suitable for refuge during an emergency (circled in black above) These sites are all easily accessible from central campus, have access to fresh water, are located on high ground, and are far from crime, geological hazards, fault lines, and toxic sites. The South and West sides of campus are least suitable because of their low elevations and proximity to crime and toxic sites. -23 -22 -21 -20 -19 -18 -17 -16 -15 -14 -13 -12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -2 0 2 ¯ 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 500 Feet Final Analysis overlay of suitability analysis, network analysis, and elevation data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email protected]@ ! 5&,*1,-&-. 8)"$0. T9921&$)(&(*+ #)3 ;2)+&1#()&+ =$*>&0? @,)A".1. U B*1:(;* O1*# ! 5#%;$%#&* +*1:(;* #1*# #<#= 0126 ;#69$+> $+()C &1#:*% &(6* () 6()$&*+ #+ &D* (69*3#);*V /1*#W+U E> F> , 1*;%#++(0= :#%$*+ &2 1*0%*;& <*(CD&+ ! PE6()QN@ E4F6()QN, F4,6()QNE XF6()Q4, ! O33 :#%$*+ &2C*&D*1 %#=*1+ $+()C J#+&*1 5#%;$%#&21 ! O33 3(+;1*&* #)3 ;2)&()$2$+ 1#+&*1 %#=*1+ $+()C J#+&*1 5#%;$%#&21 ! B1,)A 9-1*)71A1*" @,)A".1. Method ¯ 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 500 Feet -10 -3 0 3 5 ¯ 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 500 Feet Elevation Analysis Higher Elevations were more suitable because of flooding Source: National Elevation Dataset, Seamless Server 1 2 3 Does not take into account travel time to reach these locations, which is why the Network Analysis was so important Source: UC Berkeley Campus Database, John Radke Source: UC Berkeley Campus Database, John Radke Limitations of Data -Data was limited to extents of campus -Network analysis only takes into account paths that can be driven on, not the numerous pedestiran routes around campus -Crime and toxic site data was only relevant to the Western part of campus -In the future, data for more opportunites could be found, such as emergency supplies or convenience stores Opportunities -8 -7 - -6 -5 -4 - -3 -2 - -1 Constraints 200’ Buffer around Fresh Water 100’ Buffer around Roads 200’ Buffer around Fault Lines “Poor” Foundation and Soil Stability 300’ Buffer around Crime 500’ Buffer around Toxic Sites 300’ Buffer around Landslide Hazards Berkeley Street Network ¯ 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 500 Feet -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 Initial Suitability Analysis " ) >2min -3 <1min +5 1-2min +3 2-3min +1 " ) Sather Tower Network Analysis Calculated Service Area based on 1, 2, and 3 minute increments of travel time from the Campenile

The Safest Place to go on UC Berkeley’s Campus during the ...ratt.ced.berkeley.edu/classes/c188/2011Posters/grade=1.0/JoyHannig...The Safest Place to go on UC Berkeley’s Campus

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Safest Place to go on UC Berkeley’s Campus during the ...ratt.ced.berkeley.edu/classes/c188/2011Posters/grade=1.0/JoyHannig...The Safest Place to go on UC Berkeley’s Campus

The Safest Place to go on UC Berkeley’s Campus during the 2012 Apocalypse

Clients: on UC Berkeley ’s Campus-Network Analysis based on someone centrally located, at the Sather Tower Campenile

Problem: 2012 Apocalypse-No access to public utilities, such as water and electricity-Natural Disasters including �ooding and earthquakes-High crime: looting, mobs, etc.

Two Methods:1. Suitability Analysis to �nd the location with the most favorable conditions2. Network Analysis to �nd the accessible locations

ConclusionsThe Faculty Club, Hilgard/Giannini Hall, the open area east of Memorial Glade, and Dwinell , most suitable for refuge during an emergency (circled in black above)These sites are all easily accessible from central campus, have access to fresh water, are located on high ground, and are far from crime, geological hazards, fault lines, and toxic sites.

The South and West sides of campus are least suitable because of their low elevations and proximity to crime and toxic sites.

-23

-22

-21

-20

-19

-18

-17

-16

-15

-14

-13

-12

-11

-10

-9

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-2

0

2 ¯ 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500Feet

Final Analysisoverlay of suitability analysis,

network analysis, and elevation data

!"#$%&'%()*)% +,#-*.% ! ()*)%/0$#)0)*1&,% ! 2$134*%

! 5&671,1,3%8)"$0.%&'%9)6$%()*)%!"#$!

% 5&671,1,3%5&,*1,-&-.%),:%(1.;0$*$%

% !

"#$%&!'()*+! ! !

,--.!/$00*1!#12$)3!"#$%&!'()*+! ! 4,! !

51(6*! ! !

78921&!:(2%*)&!;1(6*+!)*<!%#=*1>!?$00*1!?=!,--.! ! 4@! !

A221!B2(%!B&#?(%(&=!

! !

B*%*;&!C*2%2C(;#%!#1*#+!<(&D!9221!+2(%!+&#?(%(&=>!*8921&!#+!)*<!%#=*1! ! 4E! !

A221!"2$)3#&(2)!

!

B*%*;&!C*2%2C(;#%!#1*#+!<(&D!9221!02$)3#&(2)>!*8921&!#+!)*<!%#=*1! ! 4F! !

'#)3+%(3*+! ! ,--.!?$00*1!#12$)3!%#)3+%(3*!D#G#13+! ! 4F! !

! !

(1.;0$*$%5&,.*0)1,*%8)"$0.%

H28(;!B(&*+! ! @--.!?$00*1!#12$)3!&28(;!+(&*+! ! 4E! !

!!

I)(2)!%#=*1+>!+$6!&D*!+$(&#?%=!

<*(CD&()C>!&D*)!;2):*1&!&2!

J#+&*1>!1*;%#++(0=!K)2!

3#&#L!#+!-! ! % ! ! ! ! ! ! %

B2$1;*+!20!"1*+D!M#&*1! ! F--.!?$00*1!#12$)3!"1*+D!M#&*1! ! NF! ! !

!(1.;0$*$%<##&0*-,1*"%

8)"$0.% O;;*++!&2!J2#3+! ! E--.!/$00*1!#12$)3!J2#3+! ! NE! !

52):*1&!&2!J#+&*1>!

1*;%#++(0=!K)2!3#&#L!#+!-!

! ! ! ! !

7%*:#&(2)! !

J*;%#++(0=!*%*:#&(2)!3#&#!#+!#)!29921&$)(&=!(0!(&!(+!D(CD!#)3!#!;2)+&1#()&!(0!(&!(+!%2<! !

PE--.!Q!4E-!E--4F--.!Q-!F--4,--.!QNE!,--4R--.!QN,[email protected]@!

! 5&,*1,-&-.%

8)"$0.%%T9921&$)(&(*+!#)3!;2)+&1#()&+! =$*>&0?%

@,)A".1.U!B*1:(;*!O1*#!

!

5#%;$%#&*!+*1:(;*!#1*#!#<#=!0126!;#69$+>!$+()C!&1#:*%!&(6*!()!6()$&*+!#+!&D*!(69*3#);*V!/1*#W+U!E>!F>!,!1*;%#++(0=!:#%$*+!&2!1*0%*;&!<*(CD&+!

!

PE6()QN@!E4F6()QN,!F4,6()QNE!XF6()Q4,!

!

O33!:#%$*+!&2C*&D*1!%#=*1+!$+()C!J#+&*1!5#%;$%#&21!

!

O33!3(+;1*&*!#)3!

;2)&()$2$+!1#+&*1!%#=*1+!

$+()C!J#+&*1!

5#%;$%#&21!

! %

B1,)A%9-1*)71A1*"%@,)A".1.!

!

Method

¯ 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500Feet

-10

-3

0

3

5 ¯ 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500Feet

Elevation Analysis

Higher Elevations were more suitable because of �oodingSource: National Elevation Dataset, Seamless Server

1

2

3

Does not take into account travel time to reach these locations, which is why the Network Analysis was so importantSource: UC Berkeley Campus Database, John Radke

Source: UC Berkeley Campus Database, John Radke

Limitations of Data-Data was limited to extents of campus-Network analysis only takes into account paths that can be driven on, not the numerous pedestiran routes around campus-Crime and toxic site data was only relevant to the Western part of campus-In the future, data for more opportunites could be found, such as emergency supplies or convenience stores

Opportunities

-8

-7 - -6

-5

-4 - -3

-2 - -1

Constraints

200’ Bu�er around Fresh Water

100’ Bu�er around Roads

200’ Bu�er around Fault Lines

“Poor” Foundationand Soil Stability

300’ Bu�er around Crime500’ Bu�er around Toxic Sites

300’ Bu�er aroundLandslide Hazards

Berkeley Street Network

¯ 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000500Feet

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

Initial Suitability Analysis

")

>2min -3

<1min +5

1-2min +3

2-3min +1

") Sather Tower

Network Analysis

Calculated Service Area based on 1, 2, and 3 minute increments of travel time from the Campenile