Upload
baldwin-colin-porter
View
215
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The role of sanctions and their effects on performance rankings of companies in the basic metals industry
accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange
1-Abdol Hamid SafaeiGhadikolaei, PhD in Industrial Management, Associate Professor University of
Mazandaran
2-Mahmoud Yahyazadehfar, Ph. D in Financial Management, Professor University of Mazandaran
3- NimaNouripour M.A Student of Industrial Management, University of Mazandaran
In The Name Of God
With regard to the sanctions applied against the Islamic Republic of Iran, evaluation of performance and ranking of active companies in the basic metals industry accepted in Tehran Stock Exchange were studied before and after tightening sanctions, and performance ranking of companies was compared before and after the intensification of sanctions in the relevant industry.
ABSTRACT
Different studies highlighted various criteria for performance evaluation of companies that is possible to apply suitable criteria depending on management understanding of the company. Concerning the viewpoints of financial experts, the present study uses Thirteen criteria including:
return of assets (ROA) , return of equity (ROE) , operating profit growth (OPG) , price to earnings ratio (P/E) , economic value added (EVA) ,
market value added (MVA) , cash value added (CVA) , refined value added (REVA) , true value added (TVA) , Tobin’s Q , created shareholder value (CSV) , percentage of non-members’ possession of board of directors and
the percentage of institutional investors.
CRITERIA OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
One of the methods of extracting the significance weight of criteria in
decision making with multiple criteria is Shannon entropy.
The benefit of this method in relation with other methods of extracting
the significant weight is the fact that it is completely an objective
method, and it does not include the orientation of experts’ comments
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE DEGREE OF SUB-CRITERIA WITH GREY SHANNON ENTROPY
“Decision making matrix” includes information that entropy can be applied as a criterion for its evaluation. Assume that decision making matrix is as
follows:
GREY SHANNON ENTROPY
As to this matrix, pij is calculated as follows:
Relation 1:
And entropy of indicator i is calculated with the following relation:
Relation 2:
GREY SHANNON ENTROPY
is calculated as the following:
Relation 3:
Then weigh is calculated:
Relation 4:
GREY SHANNON ENTROPY
Sub-criteria of performance evaluation
WjSub-criteria of performance
evaluationWj
X1 )ROA (return of assets [0.0018 , 0.1557] X9 Refined value added (REVA) [0.0017 , 0.0351]
X2 Return of equity(ROE) [0.002 , 0.0531] X10 ) Tobin’s Q( [0.0026 , 0.1318]
X3Operating Profit Growth
(OPG)[0.0003 , 0.048] X11
Created Shareholder Value (CSV) [0.0025 , 0.0656]
X4 Price earnings ratios (P/E) [0.0031 , 0.0386] X12Percentage of non-members
managers [0.0013 , 0.1316]
X5 Economic Value Added (EVA) [0.0011 , 0.0497] X13Percentage of institutional
investors [0.0008 , 0.0719]
X6 Market Value Added (MVA) [0.0026 , 0.0631]
X7Cash Value Added
) CVA([0.0017 , 0.0937]
X8True Value Added
) TVA([0.0008 , 0.0627]
SIGNIFICANCE DEGREE OF SUB-CRITERIA OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
Grey system theory, is an algorithm that analyzes uncertain relationship of member of a system with a reference
member and it has the ability of solving multiple criteria decision making. Grey relational analysis process is
detailed as follows:
In a multi indicators decision making problem which has m options and n indicators, Ith option can be expressed as is performance vale of indicator j for option i. Yi can be change into comparative series with help of one of the (1),(2) or (3) relations.
GREY RELATIONAL ANALYZE
1-GREY RELATIONAL GENERATING
1-GREY RELATIONAL GENERATING
This paper defines reference sequence definition as and then searches an option which its comparative series are
nearer to this reference sequence definition.
Grey Relational coefficient can be calculated using relation (4):
2- REFERENCE SEQUENCE DEFINITION
3- GREY RELATIONAL COEFFICIENT
After calculating of all gray relational coefficients, Grey's relational grade can be calculated using relation (5):
4- GREY RELATIONAL GRADE
differentiation coefficient 0.5
company degree grade
Calsimin 0.663895 1
National Iranian Copper Industries 0.620981 2
Sepanta 0.574913 3
Amir Kabir Kashan Steel 0.573194 4
Fromolibden Kerman 0.544223 5
National Lead and Zinc 0.543736 6
Lole & Mashin sazi 0.53447 7
Alomorad 0.529015 8
Mobarake Esfahan Steel 0.5185 9
Alomtak 0.513857 10
Sar Toska Steel 0.511154 11
Navarde ghataate Foladi 0.506226 12
Iran Aluminum 0.505604 13
Foroselis Iran 0.502873 14
Kavian Steel 0.501193 15
Tajhizate Sadid 0.499988 16
Bahonar Copper 0.496686 17
Navard va Lole Ahvaz 0.489644 18
Navard Aluminum 0.484878 19
Sanati Sepahan 0.449512 20
RANKING OF COMPANIES IN THE BASIC METALS INDUSTRY BEFORE THE INTENSIFICATION OF SANCTIONS
According to the results in the tables Calsimin
Company is chosen as a company with best performance and
maximum grading in basic metals
accepted In Tehran Stock Exchange
before the intensification of
sanctions 2002-2007.
differentiation coefficient 0.5
company degree gradeNational Iranian Copper Industries 0.642336 1
Alomorad 0.611276 2National Lead and Zinc 0.610953 3
Alomtak 0.608952 4Foroselis Iran 0.600502 5
Amir Kabir Kashan Steel 0.579112 6Tajhizate Sadid 0.574761 7
Calsimin 0.562157 8Navarde ghataate Foladi 0.560885 9
Kavian Steel 0.55559 10Navard Aluminum 0.540619 11Bahonar Copper 0.535444 12
Mobarake Esfahan Steel 0.534093 13Iran Aluminum 0.533305 14Sar Toska Steel 0.526056 15
Lole & Mashin sazi 0.516715 16Sepanta 0.516042 17
Fromolibden Kerman 0.509486 18Sanati Sepahan 0.498603 19
Navard va Lole Ahvaz 0.4647 20
RANKING OF COMPANIES IN THE BASIC METALS INDUSTRY AFTER THE INTENSIFICATION OF SANCTIONS
According to the results in the tables National Iranian Copper Industries Company is chosen as a company with best performance and maximum grading in basic metals Industry in the Tehran Stock Exchange during the years 2008-2013.