THE RIP Road Map

RECOMMEND

Presentation of the RIP Roadmap

by all RECOMMEND project partners

Status Quo: October 2013

24th Oct 2013

RECOMMEND

Part I


by Partners: AT, PL, CZ & SI

24th Oct. 2013, 4th WS in Poland

24th Oct 2013

THE RIP Road Map

• General information about the RIP: Each partner will create an individual RIP for his region The RIP will consist of 2 independent parts

• Roadmap for the RIP- • Regional Implementation Plan -

The Roadmap focuses on the WHY a special good practice or new idea was chosen and WHO and HOW it will be implemented within the partner region

Target of the Road Map presentation at the WS 4:

informing the partners about• your selected action for the RIP

• the reasons / back ground info for your selection

• Which stakeholders will implement your RIP

24th Oct 2013 3

RECOMMEND RIP Road Map

Lower AustriaBenjamin Kuscher

24th Oct 2013

Toruń / PL

24th Oct 2013

Overview: now - then

5

Short description about your challanges which hinder respectively make the implementation of eco friendly actions difficult:

*) xxxxx*) xxxxx*) xxxxx*) xxxxx*) xxxxx

our solution

A common search tool (My eco-expert) will be used to strengthen transparency regarding

- qualification,- experience, - competence and - licensees of all consultants

The target is to light out the funding jungle

Our current situation• Each eco-funding scheme in Lower Austria manages its own pool of experts (often the same persons) and wants to keep control. • There is a lack of cooperation between the eco-funding institutions.• There are already existing search tools but with specific needs for specific institutions – • The tools are used only by one organisation.• Finding the appropriate external eco-expert or eco-funding scheme is not easy enough

Our proposal

24th Oct 2013

New plan for My ECO-Expert

6

Ökomanagement NÖ

Environmental Consulting by Chamber of Commerce

eNuKlimabündnis

UmweltberatungEnergieberatung

RECOMMEND Pilot

My ECO-expert

ClientsCompanies Public Org.

RECOMMEND RIP

24th Oct 2013

More info about your planned action

7

My eco-expert Key words as answers are enough….

What is it about A common search tool for eco-experts of all consultancy programmes in the region. (My eco-expert)

What do you expect to achieve?

• Easier access to expertise• More funding cases• More transperancy on the quality of the consultancy• Improve the cooperation of ALL initiatives supporting eco-

management and eco-innovation in Lower Austria• Improve the transparency and service for the clients

Indicators you expect to achieve?

• Higher number of funded projects• Better image of the funding institutions• More and better cooperation between funding organisations• Increasing quality of the external experts and funded projects via

transparency (feedback, evaluation, reports)

Has someone already tested the practice / idea? If yes, who & where & when?

The idea is new to most funding organisations – only one organisation is using a search tool. The technique is not new, but the trans-organisational use of a search tool is unique

Is it easy to implement? Please explain why or why not

The technique and data are available. It just depends on the cooperational will of the stakeholders. This will should be guaranteed by the RIP.

24th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

824th Oct 2013

Stakeholder A Barbara NährerRegional Government Department of environmental and energy economics Programme Manager Ökomanagement

Main fields of activities of stakeholder organisation

*) “Ökomanagement Niederösterreich” (regional Government)Environmental consulting support for public and private organisations.

Priorities and interests of stakeholder in relation to the selected good practice/idea.

*) Creating a one-stop-shop for eco-management funding projects in Lower AustriaHigher quality of external experts and funding projectsHigher cooperation between the institutions

Risk & chance of this stakeholder to support or to hinder my RIP

*) No risk. They will support the RIP. However due to a restructuring process within the reg. gov. there is a uncertainty how the funding scheme will be organised in the future.

STAKEHOLDER A

My stakeholders

924th Oct 2013

STAKEHOLDER B

Stakeholder B Energie und Umweltagentur NÖ eNuEnergy Agency Lower AustriaHubert FragnerHead department for communities


*) Environmental consulting support for public organisations


*) Creating a one-stop-shop for eco-management funding projects in Lower AustriaHigher cooperation between the institutions


*) They support the cooperation, but do not see so much need that the expert needs to be selected by the client. They still prefer to assign an expert. But this is according to competition regulations not possible anymore. So we are sure to convince them.

My stakeholders

1024th Oct 2013

STAKEHOLDER C

Stakeholder C Lower Austrian Regional government,Office Department of economy, tourism and technologyDoris MayerResponsible for sustainability programmes


*) This department is responsible for all economic funding schemes.The ecological funding schemes for companies are therefore a crosscutting issue which will need to be addressed by both departments.


*) Creating a one-stop-shop for eco-management funding projects in Lower Austria


*) This department will support the RIP, however they are also responsible for the restructuring of Ökomanagement NÖ.

Realisation of My eco-Expert

11

Ökomanagement supports the transperant

selection of experts

Eco-experts will support the creation of one singe

search tool.

The federal gov. supports clear and transperant criteria for

eco-experts

Eco-experts will fear the additional work in providing the requested information.

Opposition in the own department because they want to keep controle of

their expert pool.

Yellow circles: supportRed circles: obstacles

Please state in key words which main support and main obstacles /threats/ difficulties you are expecting to face when establishing the RIP in your region.

Chamber of commerce will see it as competition

24th Oct 2013

Promotion possibilities for RIP

1224th Oct 2013

HOW the RIP & his supporters can be promoted

On regional level • Promotion in newsletters • Promotion at events in Lower Austria and Vienna• RIP will be presented jointly with other regional RIPs

On national level

• Promotion in newsletters• Promotion at project meetings with the Austrian sustainability officers

(Austrian provinces)On international level

• Promotion at international meetings (best practice)

Any idea how you resp. the RECOMMEND team can promote the Final RIP on regional / national and / or international level?e.g. signing the RIP at press conference, round table with stakeholders, press release, promoting at international events suchas Open Days…)

TO DO List for the next months

1324th Oct 2013

MONTH 2013 TO DOs Who

September Introduction of the idea at selected incubators

Barbara Nährer and partners

October RIP presented at Working Summit.


November Preparation base conceptDraft search criteria for eco-experts


December Discussion with selected consultants/external expertsFinal definition of search criteria for eco-experts



January system specification for the platform/database in cooperation with the contractor


February Implementation of the platform (local contractor)test version of My eco-expert


March Implementation of the platform (local contractor)Collection of expert data


April Implementation of the platform (local contractor)Input of expert data



Kujawsko-Pomorskie VoivodeshipRafał Modrzewski

24th Oct 2013

Torun / PL

24th Oct 2013


15



our solution

Establishing new innovation voucher scheme

Establishing instruments of support for clusters development

Our current situation

Innovation voucher scheme - regional R&D sector not used efficiently

Low level of cooperation between R&D sector and companies

Lack of instruments of support for clusters development (ecoclusters)

Our proposal

24th Oct 2013


16

Name / Key Words of your selected action you want to implement

Key words as answers are enough….

What is it about Innovation voucher scheme / instruments of clasters’ support

What do you expect to achieve? Use of regional R&D sector / creation of new clasters

Indicators you expect to achieve? Number of companies supported in the scope of research’s effects implementation/ Number of clusters supported,


Voucher scheme – South Moravian Innovation Centre/ Clusters - Peterborough EnviroCluster, UK; Green Tech Valey, Austria


Voucher scheme – easy to implement – experience from implementation of simmilar scheme;Clusters – difficulties caused by entrepreneurs’ attitude

24th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

1724th Oct 2013

Stakeholder A please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function *) Marshal’s Office of Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodeship*) Agnieszka Jóźwiak

*) Department of EU Funds and Projects Management


Regional Operational Programme Management

Cooperation with Business Support Institutions


Including good practise solutions into New ROP programming period


chance – better effects of future ROP implementation

risk - EU legal obstacles, political will

STAKEHOLDER A

My stakeholders

1824th Oct 2013

STAKEHOLDER B

Stakeholder B please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function Kujawsko-Pomorska Agency of InnovationMarta Dolecka


Support of innovation development in the region


Implementation of new voucher scheme


chance – tight cooperation with entrepreneurs – best knowledge about their needs

risk – EU legal obstacles

My stakeholders

1924th Oct 2013

STAKEHOLDER C

Stakeholder C please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function / Toruń Regional Development AgencyPiotr Józefiak


Support for enterepreneurship development (technological parks, business incubators)


Implementation of clusters’ instruments of support


chance - great knowledge and experience in cooperation with entrepreneurs

risk – entrepreneurs negative attitude

Realisation of RIP

20

R&D potential

Engaged business support

institutions

Regional Operational Programme resources

Entrepreneurs’ mentality

Political changes



EU legal obstacles

24th Oct 2013


2124th Oct 2013


On regional level -Opening of public consultations of the Kujawsko-Pomorskie Regional Operational Program 2014-

2020;- Workshop with Mr. Jindrich Weiss from South Moravian Innovation Centre who is a manager of the Innovation Vouchers Project.

On national level

On international level



2224th Oct 2013


October

November ROP consultations,workshop with Mr. Jindrih Weiss from South Moravian Innovation Centre about voucher scheme,

Marshal’s office of Kujawsko-Pomorskie Region, Kujawsko-Pomorska Agency of Innovation, R&D institutions from the region

December Study visit in Green Tech Valey

Marshal’s Office of Kujawsko-Pomorskie Region, Toruń Regional Development Agency, regional clusters‘ coordinators

MONTH 2014

January

February

March

April

May

June Final approval of RIP and ist connections to ROP for 2014-2020

Marshal’s Office of Kujawsko-Pomorskie Region

July

August

RECOMMEND WS4 Poland

RIP Roadmap - Czech RepublicPP4 – Jan Jareš, Ekoport

24th Oct 2013

Road Map CZ – South Bohemia

• based on ongoing PA – pilot innovation vouchers scheme• in relation to local pre-conditions of the region• low level of awareness on eco-innovation/eco-management• lesson learnt from other regions / best practice

24th Oct 2013 24


25



our solution

Pilot innovation voucher scheme (broad preferences)

Verification, feed back collection, raising awareness on +‘s of the tool

Scheme adjustment – „eco“ aspect (preference x special call)


No eco-innovation / management tool in the region

Low level of cooperation between R&D and local industry

Other regions have lead

No awareness among politicians

Our proposal

24th Oct 2013

Planned action info

26



What is it about Implementing of pilot (eco) innovation vouchers scheme

What do you expect to achieve? Functional and succesful eco-innovation tool

Indicators you expect to achieve? At least 1 mil. CZK / per year allocated for the scheme


9 out of 14 regions in the CZ have succesfully implemented this kind of scheme


To achieve „eco“ innovation voucher scheme is „step by step“ approach

24th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

2724th Oct 2013

Stakeholder A Regional Authority of South Bohemia Luboš Průchahead of division responsible for regional development, spatial planning, construction and investments at Regional Authority of South Bohemia


Regional Authority of South Bohemia


implementation of the schemeadministration of the schemeadjustments / modifications


Thanks to the RECOMMEND activitiy – importance of implementation this scheme as one of the last region in the Czech Republic has been pointed out. Regional Authority (leading members of the board) gave “green light” to the action.

STAKEHOLDER A

My stakeholders

2824th Oct 2013

STAKEHOLDER B

Stakeholder B South Bohemian Agency for Support to Innnovative Entrepreneurship (JAIP) Petra Vachová, chairman


Main organisation in the region focused on facilitation and intermediation of cooperation between R&D and industry.


feedback collection contribution to proposal for scheme adjustment facilitation of virtual communication platform


JAiP has been active in initiating of such scheme for a long time so we have full support from them. Moreover JAiP is taking over major part of our Pilot action as external contractor.

My stakeholders

2924th Oct 2013

STAKEHOLDER C

Stakeholder C South Bohemian University and Academy Technology Transfer Centre (JCTT) Růžena Štemberková


technology transfer servicesfacilitator of cooperation between R&D and industry


main communication channel and interface for the most significant R&D capacity in the regionsetting up formal cooperation within the scheme


more or less supportive stakeholder implementation of the scheme will comply JCTT’s services for industry seeking for cooperation with R&D capacities

Realisation of RIP

30

step by step approach

best practice / external experts

simplicity and transferability of the

tool

applicability of local R&D

capacities towards industry

perception of „eco“ in CZ


low level of awareness

24th Oct 2013


3124th Oct 2013


On regional levelThrough release of communication materials such as leaflets / press conference / workshop.

On national level

Dedicated website for the scheme and presentation within newly established communication platform for innovation vouchers managers.

On international level

Through official communication channels with RECOMMEND project and possibly localisation of the website to English version.



3224th Oct 2013


October Preparation of innovation voucher scheme (monitoring and selection of relevant R&D capacities)

contractor + Ekoport

November Preparation of innovation voucher scheme (communication and agreements preparation with relevant R&D capacities)


DecemberPreparation of innovation voucher scheme (elaboratin scheme documentation, legal analysis, regional authority negotiation)


MONTH 2014

January Preparation of innovation voucher scheme (elaboratin scheme documentation, legal analysis, regional authority negotiation)


FebruaryFirst call preparation + follow up campaign contractor + Ekoport

MarchFollow-up campaign launch (website, leaflets, etc.) contractor + Ekoport

AprilStakeholders involvement / feedback / adaption Ekoport

MayProposal for possible modifications Ekoport

June„eco“ aspect proposal elaboration Ekoport

July„eco“ aspect proposal negotiation Ekoport

August2nd call preparation with „eco“ aspect integration Ekoport

RECOMMEND RIP Road MapLEA Spodnje Podravje

Uroš Majerič

24th Oct 2013Torun / PL

24th Oct 2013


34



- Lack of networking- Lack of eco innovation - Lack of funding systems- Lack of R&D Projects- Great interest for implementation in renewable energy sources and increase of energy efficiency

our solution

-Establishment of the cluster-Proposal of efficient funding system for our situation -Connection with different organizations -Establishment of meetings on a regular basis

Our current situation Our proposal

24th Oct 2013


35



What is it about Eco Bionics Cluster

What do you expect to achieve? Network of partners, Program groups, Events, Shared Services,..

Indicators you expect to achieve? Number of partners, innovations, events,..


New idea


No, it’s a new idea.

24th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

3624th Oct 2013

Stakeholder A please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function College of Bionics PtujMsc. Darja Harb

Headmaster


- educational centre


- research and development in the field of eco bionics

Risk & chance of this stakeholder to support or to hinder my RIP - high chance to support because their area of expertise

STAKEHOLDER A

My stakeholders

3724th Oct 2013

STAKEHOLDER B

Stakeholder B please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function International institute for energy bionicsAnja Kostevšek

Director


- Development of novel technologies, approaches, methodologies, services and products in the field of environmental and energy bionics


- Research in the field of eco innovation and bionics

Risk & chance of this stakeholder to support or to hinder my RIP - High chance because there is no group connection established

My stakeholders

3824th Oct 2013

STAKEHOLDER C

Stakeholder C please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function / Local Businesses


- Supply chain for request and demand


- Being eco frendly, inovative, using new technology and products, establishment of new buissnes connections


Realisation of RIP

39

new connections with different organizations

support by national policies

lack of financial funds



not enough support

24th Oct 2013


4024th Oct 2013


On regional level - Press releases, seminars for stakeholders, information dissemination through WEB pages, articles etc.

On national level

- Press releases, signing the RIP at press conference with the Minister

On international level - Promoting at international events, on different scientific and technical fairs, in papers and journals



4124th Oct 2013


October - Cluster organization plan - LEA Spodnje Podravje, External experts

November - Cluster organization plan - LEA Spodnje Podravje, External experts

December - Cluster organization plan - LEA Spodnje Podravje, External experts

MONTH 2014

January - Cluster organization plan - LEA Spodnje Podravje, External experts

February - RIP Preparation - LEA Spodnje Podravje, External experts

March - RIP Preparation - LEA Spodnje Podravje, External experts

April - RIP Preparation - LEA Spodnje Podravje, External experts

May - RIP Preparation - LEA Spodnje Podravje

June - RIP Preparation

- LEA Spodnje Podravje

July - RIP Preparation - LEA Spodnje Podravje

August - Finalization of the RIP - LEA Spodnje Podravje, External experts

RECOMMEND

Part II


by Partners: EE, IT, UK & BG

25th Oct. 2013, 4th WS in Poland

25th Oct 2013


Tartu Regional Energy AgencyMartin Kikas

25th Oct 2013

Torun / PL

25th Oct 2013


44



our solution

Acknowledgement of the businesses to rise motivation

and awareness about the eco-management and eco-

innovation

Please state only key words which describes your best practice example:e.g. establishing a new funding system; establishing a new cluster etc…

Our current situationPlease state key words describing the kind of situation you have to face in your region which hinders eco friendly actions and which will be addressed by your RIP. E.g.lack of funding systems, lack of networking…

Our proposal

Different stakeholders (public and private) have low awareness of eco-innovation and eco-management. Insufficient motivation to implement eco-management systems and eco-innovation tools as it is not seen as a profitable for business.

25th Oct 2013


45



What is it about To encourage private and public organsations to develop and implement environmental and climate friendly measures

What do you expect to achieve? We expect to see the public and private sectors awareness and motivation to rise and increase the implementation of environmental management systems

Indicators you expect to achieve? Number of participants, complete evaluation procedure


It was tested at Lower-Austria region


We believe it is achievable because there is a recognition events in Tartu but not about eco-management or eco-innovation

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

46

Stakeholder A

Raimond Tamm, City of Tartu, Deputy Mayor


Governance City of Tartu


Tartu City development plan 2014-2020


60:40

STAKEHOLDER A

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

47

STAKEHOLDER B

Stakeholder B

Toomas Noorem, Tartu Science Park, Managing Director, Memeber of the Board


Tartu Science Park is the oldest science park in the Baltics. For almost 20 years, they have supported business innovation activities in the region by networking with universities, public and private sector.


The vision of Tartu Science Park is to be a originator of new things, to bring different parts together and create synergy


60:40

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

48

STAKEHOLDER C

Stakeholder C

Karin Kilk, Estonian Association for Environmental Management, Coordinating Secretary


The main objective of the Association is to bring together enterprises, organisations and individuals, who need help, support and information related to corporate environmental management for solving environmental problems, reducing impact to the environment and ensuring sustainable development of the society


Estonian Association for Environmental Management is eco-management promoter and distributor


70:30

25th Oct 2013

Realisation of RIP

49



25th Oct 2013


50


On regional level Conference, meeting with stakeholders, press releases

On national level

Conference, Articles, press releases

On international level Conference (Field Mission)


25th Oct 2013


51

MONTH 2013 TO DOs WhoOctober WS in Poland

Martin, Neeme, Tanel

November Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


December Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


MONTH 2014

January Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


February Pilot Acton seminar nr.2


March Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


April Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


May Preparation activities for RIP and negotiations with stakeholders


June Finalising RIP and identification of sources of financing


September - Oktober

Field Mission, Workshop, Conference Martin, Neeme, Tanel

25th Oct 2013


Province of Ascoli Piceno (IT)Claudio Carducci

25th Oct 2013

Torun / PL

25th Oct 2013


53



our solution

• To improve an already existing funding system;

• To uniform system for public funds to eco-innovation;

• To raise the awareness of SMEs in using eco-innovation (in term of benefits):

• To inform people about eco-innovation benefits and opportunities in their territory


• Low investment in innovation;• Public funds related to eco-

innovation fragmented;• Current know-how comes from

traditional sectors;• Difficulties for SMEs to clearly

identify eco-innovation improvement measures;

• Still relatively low consciousness of the potential importance of investing in eco-innovation;

• Low level of communication/dissemination of innovative activities.

Our proposal

25th Oct 2013

More info about your planned action (1/2)

54

ITACA PROTOCOL Key words as answers are enough….What is it about System for the evaluation of environmental sustainability

of buildings to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and energy consumption. Each building evaluated receive a score able to identify its eco-energy efficiency.

What do you expect to achieve? To create a regional system for the evaluation and certification of environmental sustainability of buildings in the territory.

Indicators you expect to achieve? n/a


The ITACA protocol is in force in Italy since 2004 although the process to uniform the evaluation system has been started in 2012. Only 11 of the 21 Italian Regional Authorities ratified the protocol.


Yes it is easy because the evaluation system already exist.

25th Oct 2013

More info about your planned action (2/2)

55

Eco-Management Vouchers


What is it about Funding scheme to develop and implement environmental and climate friendly measures among private and public organisations.

What do you expect to achieve? To foster the implementation of environmental and eco-friendly measures in the sector of energy efficient buildings

Indicators you expect to achieve? n/a


The Eco-Management Vouchers have been already experimented in the Lower Austrian Region.


Yes it is, because the idea is adaptable to different sectors and territories. The strength points are: the possibility to apply for small funding; the fluent administration management; the progressive funding system.

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

56

Stakeholder AMr. Minetti Antonio

Head of the “Environment and Territory Department” of the Marche Regional Authority


•Territorial and economic development;•Management of relevant policies/initiatives at local level


• To include good practices in the “Energetic and Environmental Regional Plan”

• To foster eco-innovation in order to improve territorial development

• To communicate to citizens and local SME’s and to other relevant actors (as researchers, entrepreneurs, etc.) eco-innovation benefits.

Risk & chance of this stakeholder to support or to hinder my RIP • Low political priority;

• Capacity to adopt Eco- innovation policies and initiatives at local level;

• Ability to communicate to local citizens and SME’s and other relevant actors-researchers, entrepreneurs, etc.

STAKEHOLDER A

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

57

STAKEHOLDER BStakeholder B

Mr. Michele Santucci

Referent for “TecnoMarche” Science and Technology Park of Marche Region


• Development of strategies and projects to promote innovation in the territory;

• Dissemination of innovation, providing enterprises with information, services and grants (e.g. environmental and quality certification).

• Technical Assistance and technology transfer, advanced services.


•To cooperate with local SMEs to implement the good practice;•To provide training in eco-innovation and management;•To explore future business opportunities.

Risk & chance of this stakeholder to support or to hinder my RIP • Lack of interest in the priority;

• Extensive networks of partners and local actors;• Extensive knowledge of the territorial productive

system and sector analysis;• Dissemination of project results.

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

58

STAKEHOLDER CStakeholder C

Mr. Fabio Polonara

Ordinary Professor at the “Energetic Department” of the University of Ancona

Mr. Marco SotteProfessor Assistant


•Higher education Institute focused on research in technologies and Innovation.


• To use eco-innovation in term of knowledge exchange, new researches, etc.

• To influence students and young researchers – future generation of innovators

Risk & chance of this stakeholder to support or to hinder my RIP • Lack of interest in the priority;

• Experience in relevant R&D sector;• Ensure on-going dialogue between academic research

and the productive system. • Capacity to disseminate project results and influence

students and young researchers

25th Oct 2013

Realisation of RIP

59

Using of already

existing public funds

RIP promoted by a Public Authority

Enhanced relationship with

local stakeholdersLow level of participation

Economic benefits not

identified



Low participation private sector

25th Oct 2013


60


On regional level•Press conferences for the approval of RIP;•Round tables with local stakeholders;•Info days for public awareness;

On national level

•n/a

On international level•Participating in international events shared among RECOMMEND project partners (e.g. Open Days)


25th Oct 2013


61


October Updating of the „Energetic and Environmental Provincial Plan“ version 2013 (the RIP is included in this documents)

Province of Ascoli Piceno

November Concertation among political authorities Province of Ascoli Piceno

December Final adaptation of the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document) with administrative formal act

Province of Ascoli Piceno

MONTH 2014 January EEPP presentation to the territorial public and stakeholders

Province of Ascoli Piceno and stakeholders interested in EEPP activities

February Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)

Province of Ascoli Piceno and SMEs/organisations involved in activities

March Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


April Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


May Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


June Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


July Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


August Implementation of projects and activities scheduled in the EEPP (the RIP is included in this document)


25th Oct 2013

RECOMMEND RIP Road MapOpportunity Peterborough

Gareth Jones and Rod Gilchrist

25th October 2013Torun / PL

25th Oct 2013


63



Lack of networking

Low take up of EMS

Little training available to help companies reduce

environment footprint and gain economic benefits

our solution

EMS cluster Club

Improved networking, advice, support and training for key sectors and Fengate

geographical cluster

Reduced environment footprint

Improved EMS take up

Our current situation Our proposal

25th Oct 2013


64



What is it about Grow economy and reduce environmental footprintWhat do you expect to achieve? Growth,companies more efficient, increased EMS

use. Contribute to Environment capital goalIndicators you expect to achieve? Increase in number of companies using EMS,

reduction in environment footprint and sustainable cluster club with increased membershipo


Idea new, builds on Cluster and Investors in Environment programme and Recommend activity


Realistic challenge Peterborough aim to be Home of Environmental Capital

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

65

Stakeholder AKim ColeyBusiness and Environment OfficerPeterborough Environment City Trust


Help create cleaner, greener and healthier Peterborough


Environment Management systems and Greener City


Low risk to hinder . Strong support

STAKEHOLDER A

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

66

STAKEHOLDER B

Stakeholder B Antony GoughRenewables EastDirector Projects and Business Development


Resource Efficiency and Renewable Energy


Resource efficiency EMS


Low risk to hinderStrong support as activity fits organisation priorities

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

67

STAKEHOLDER C

Stakeholder C Charlotte PalmerPeterborough City CouncilEnvironment and Community partnerships Officer


Public Authority


Improved local environment and economy


Low risk to hinderStrong support as project fits with Peterborough City Council priorities

25th Oct 2013

Realisation of RIP

68

Good capacity and project

management

Strong key partners

Realistic objectives and good fit with local strategies

Business has no

time to implement

Business resistance to

change



Poor company engagement

25th Oct 2013


69


On regional level Launch with key large local company to champion activity Press release Stakeholder event

On national level

Share activity on a regular basis with Department for Business via local representative and Local Enterprise Partnership

On international level Brussels Open Days. Field mission for partners


25th Oct 2013


70


October Finalsie RIP

Rod and Gareth

November Create and develop clusters

Rod, Gareth and external experts

December Data gathering


MONTH 2014

January Launch event


February Training


March Training


April Training


May Training


June Complete training


July Evaluation and report


August Evaluation and report


25th Oct 2013


UBBSLAMariana Ivanova

25th Oct 2013

Torun / PL

25th Oct 2013


72



our solution

- Establishing a new finding system ( Energy efficiency vouchers)- Secure fresh funds for energy

efficiency in households- Expected results with very high

efficiency- Potential to attract and involve high

number of citizens- Potential to replicate in any other

region, town, etc.- Attract and involve local authorities- Opportunity for the owner to take

decision by his own- Opportunity to involve local utility

companies


- Low standartd of living- High energy intesity of households( old fashiopn panel concrete buidlings

without insolation, hing energy consumption, high bills, low living comfort )

- Many owners in one building, actually each apartment have one or more owners

- Difficulties to take a comon decision for any solution, incl. retrofitting of the building

- Low trust in EU programs

Our proposal

25th Oct 2013


73



What is it about Promoting Energy Efficiency Voucher scheme in Varna

What do you expect to achieve? Testing a model with high social impactIndicators you expect to achieve? ...... tonns saved CO2 (carbon emmisions)Has someone already tested the practice / idea? If yes, who & where & when?

No, it will be the pilot test of a very promising idea


It is a pilot model and our hope is to get the support of every important stakeholder, so that to avoid any potential difficulties

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

74

Stakeholder A please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function *) The Mayor of Varna*) District Mayors of Varna*) City councillors of Varna


*) Secure finding of 80 000 EUR for 20 vouchers, each of 4000 EUR*) Implementation of Information campaign*) Promotion of sustainable energy solutions


*) Reduce energy bills*) Increase living comfort


*) Lack of funding recourses*) Lack of understanding of such priority from the desicion makers

STAKEHOLDER A

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

75

STAKEHOLDER B

Stakeholder B please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function *) Local utility companies


*) Providing electricity, heat, gas, water supply


*) To implement the energy efficiency goals, according to the 20-20-20


*) The correlation CO2 emissions/penalties to be paid to the Government in case of no investment in energy efficiency measures*) The Government to not verify the saved CO2 emissions

25th Oct 2013

My stakeholders

76

STAKEHOLDER C

Stakeholder C please state his / her name, name of organisation, his / her function / *) Local building companies


*) Retrofitting and reconstruction of buildings


*) Interrelation with the main business


*) Lack of resources and lack of capacity to implement the measures in high quality according to the applicable standards

25th Oct 2013

Realisation of RIP

77

Secured funds from the city

budget dedicated to the action

Good understanding from the local

decision makers

Expected high support from the

society

Low interest and lack of trust from the beneficieries

Lack of financial sources from the

city budget



Lack of understanding of

the entire idea

25th Oct 2013


78


Presentation during the final project Conference, Presentation in any other event with similar topic

On regional level Presentation and pressconference

On national level

Presentation and pressconference

On international level Presentation and pressconference


25th Oct 2013


79


October worikng meeting with Varna Mayor

UBBSLA team

November working meeting with Varna district Mayors

UBBSLA team

December pressconference to announce the pilot action

UBBSLA team

MONTH 2014

January secure funding of 80 000 euro in Varna city budget

City councillors

February preparation of the action and promotion

UBBSLA team

March promoton of the pilot action and announce

UBBSLA team, city administration

April promotion of the pilot action and announce


May selection of 20 proposal for actions


June Implementing of actions

Building companies

July Implementing of action

Building companies

August announcing the results, pressconference


25th Oct 2013

8025th Oct 2013

Documents

THE RIP Road Map