45
The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common?

1

Page 2: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

2

Part A – RFPs

Part B – Winning Proposals

Welcome

Michael Asner Consulting Suite 21015233 Pacific AvenueWhite Rock, BC V4B 1P8 Canada

Page 3: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

3

Procurement is a Zoo!!!!

Page 4: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

4

Emergency!!

Page 5: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

5

Sole Source

Page 6: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

6

Page 7: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

7

Page 8: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

88

Tender

RFQ ITB ITQ

Page 9: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

9

RFPs……

Page 10: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

10

Page 11: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

11

When to Use an RFP

Competition

Selection on more than price alone

Page 12: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

12

A World Wide Trend

FAIR OPEN TRANSPARENT BEST VALUE

Page 13: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

13

Page 14: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

14

fair

 • adjective 1 just or appropriate in the circumstances. 2 treating people equally.

Page 15: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

15

open

• adjective 1 allowing access, passage, or view; not closed, fastened, or restricted.

Page 16: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

16

transparent

• adjective 1 allowing light to pass through so that objects behind can be distinctly seen. 2 obvious or evident.

Page 17: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

17

best value

???????

Page 18: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

18

What the Courts Have Said

Page 19: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

19

DUTIES on OWNER

Duty to discloseDuty of Care to Prospective BidderDuty of FairnessDuty to Award as TenderedDuty of Fair CompetitionDuty to Reject Non-Compliant Tenders

Page 20: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

20 20

Canadian, eh?

Once you establish Contract A, Negotiations are Not Allowed!!!

Page 21: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

21

First, the Road Well Trodden: Contract A RFPs

Page 22: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

22

Our Message is Simple... Contract A does not apply to all RFPs You can negotiate within the RFP process,

provided you set it up that way Negotiations produce more value and reduce

the risk Many RFP problems can be avoided if you

avoid Contract A

Fairness is always something to strive for

Page 23: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

23

Contract A Doesn’t Always Work!

Page 24: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

24

The Contract A/B Legal Framework

The approach was defined in 1981 by the Supreme Court of Canada in its decision in R.(Ont.) v. Ron Engineering [1981] 1S.C.R. 111 Most RFPs in Canada introduce the Contract A - Contract B approach – this is not a legal requirement, but many people have assumed it is A key legal issue upfront when starting to draft an RFP is to decide if the procurement process will be legally binding or non-binding

Page 25: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

25

The Contract A/B Legal Framework Ways to introduce Contract A?

Through express language (as long as the substance of the RFP supports the language)

Through the RFPs’ requirements (hallmarks), such as: Is there a bid security? Are the bids irrevocable? Is the pricing submitted negotiable? Is a comprehensive draft agreement attached? Are the terms of the agreement negotiable or

not? Are there instructions about amending proposals?

Page 26: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

26

The RFP Process (5 Steps)

Step 1Creating the Statement of

Work

Step 2 Involving Procurement

Step 3From Issuing the RFP to

Closing

Step 4 Evaluating Proposals

Step 5 Finalizing the Contract

Page 27: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

27

Fatal Flaws with the Contract A/B Paradigm

1. While negotiations are not permitted, they often occur, except that pricing is rarely touched (when it should be) and the vendors’ price premium stays in

2. Often mediocre proposals are accepted since the only alternative is to start again

3. Change orders compensate for the inability to change the Statement of Work that is part of the contract.

4. So you award a contract for $1million and you know you will have change orders for $200K to account for the shortcomings of the rigid RFP process

Page 28: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

28

Negotiated RFPs

Page 29: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

29

The RFP Process (6 Steps)

Step 1Creating the Statement of

Work

Step 2 Involving Procurement

Step 3From Issuing the RFP to

Closing

Step 4 Evaluating Proposals

STEP 5 NEWNEWNegotiations

Best and Final Offers

Step 6 Finalizing the Contract

Page 30: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

30

STEP 5 NEW Negotiations

Best and Final Offers

1. What is BAFO?2. What is the law?3. How does it work?4. Who uses BAFO?5. Why is BAFO not used more often?6. What are the benefits of using BAFO?

Page 31: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

31

1. What is BAFO? It’s a technique designed to improve the

quality of parts of the proposals and the pricing, or just the pricing

In the world of Contract A, this would be called “bid repair” or “bid enhancement”, but we are purposefully not in a Contract A environment

Still, we want transparency and fairness

Page 32: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

2. What is the Law?

1. Any legislation in your own jurisdiction?

2. At common law, the courts never made the use of Contract A/B mandatory?

3. Even in a Contract A/B context, you could reserve a right to conduct a BAFO

32

Page 33: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

33

3. How does BAFO work?

Page 34: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

34

A Specific Example from Alberta

Alberta’s Rules for BAFO1) Identify BAFO in the RFP2) No disclosure to vendors 3) Only one BAFO round4) Only short-listed, fully compliant vendors5) Standard invitation to BAFO6) Initiated by the Procurement Officer

Page 35: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

35

Montana’s RulesBest and Final Offers (Optional Step)

The committee may decide to seek best and final offers from one or more offerors if additional information is necessary or responses will be altered in order to make a final decision.

The committee may request only one best and final offer.

Offerors may not request an opportunity to submit a best and final offer. The procurement officer must be notified of the offerors who are provided the opportunity to submit best and final offers and the areas to be addressed.

Page 36: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

36

Montana’s RulesBest and Final Offers (Cont’d.)

The procurement officer will send out the request for best and final offers in a letter stating the areas to be covered and the date and time in which the best and final offer must be returned.

Proposal scores are adjusted in light of the new information received in the best and final offer.

A best and final offer cannot be requested on price/cost alone unless so stated in the RFP.

Page 37: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

37

4. Who Uses BAFO in Canada? City of Surrey City of Toronto City of Winnipeg Government of Alberta Government of Ontario Ontario Hospital Association Government of British Columbia Humber River Regional Hospital

Page 38: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

38

The Negotiation Process

1. Preparation2. Fact Finding3. Bargaining

Page 39: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

39

5. Why isn’t BAFO used more often?

a) Some public agencies are not be aware they can do it

b) There is a perceived lack of legal authority for BAFO (the misconception that negotiations are always prohibited)

c) Sometimes management doesn’t want the agency to do it (for their own reasons)

d) Some procurement people prefer to avoid negotiations

Page 40: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

40

Negotiations Can Be Scary!

Many procurement people receive little if any training.

The supplier is better prepared. Roles and responsibilities are poorly

defined. Many people find negotiations

awkward.

Page 41: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

41

6. What are the Benefits in using BAFO?

Increase the number of high-scoring proposals (providing greater competition).

Reduce risk to both parties. Eliminate unnecessary costs. Reduce costs. Improve benefits (better quality, performance,

delivery etc.). Identify alternative solutions not initially apparent. Clarify requirements and proposals. Create better understanding and relationships

between the parties. Improve the contract. Improve the proposal.

Page 42: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

42

Conclusion

Page 43: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

43

Negotiated RFPs

Page 44: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

44

Conclusions

What have we learned???

Page 45: The Request for Proposals and the Platypus: what do they have in common? 1

45

Thank you.

Michael Asner604/[email protected]