Upload
pang
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This article was downloaded by: [Universitaetsbibliothek Giessen]On: 29 October 2014, At: 01:35Publisher: Taylor & FrancisInforma Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK
Synthetic Communications: AnInternational Journal for RapidCommunication of SyntheticOrganic ChemistryPublication details, including instructions for authors andsubscription information:http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/lsyc20
The Reaction of Organocuprateswith Bridgehead EnonesGeorge A. Kraus a & Pang Yi aa Department of Chemistry , Iowa State University , Ames,IA, 50011Published online: 06 Dec 2006.
To cite this article: George A. Kraus & Pang Yi (1988) The Reaction of Organocuprateswith Bridgehead Enones, Synthetic Communications: An International Journalfor Rapid Communication of Synthetic Organic Chemistry, 18:5, 473-480, DOI:10.1080/00397918808060739
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00397918808060739
PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information(the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor& Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warrantieswhatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purposeof the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are theopinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor& Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should beindependently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francisshall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs,expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arisingdirectly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use ofthe Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expresslyforbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
itaet
sbib
lioth
ek G
iess
en]
at 0
1:35
29
Oct
ober
201
4
SYNTHETIC COMMUNICATIONS, 1 8 ( 5 ) , 473-480 (1988)
THE REACTION OF ORGANOCUPRATES WITH BRIDGEHEAD ENONES
George A. Kraus* and Pang Yi
Department o f Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011
ABSTRACT. lithium 2,6-ditert-butyl-4-methylphenoxide in ether affords good to excellent yields of ketones. The alkyl or alkenyl group is introduced via a conjugate addition to an in situ derived bridgehead enone.
The reaction of bromoketones with organocuprates and
Until recently, reaction at a bridgehead carbon to produce a
e quaternary stereogenic center was not a synthetically viab
reaction. As a result of much basic research in this area
methods for generating bridgehead intermediates now permit
introduction of many types of functional groups. Ketones,
amines and aryl groups may be added by way o f bridgehead
the
esters,
carbocation intermediates.'
way of bridgehead enones.'
for the direct introduction of simple alkyl groups.
Additional rings may be annulated by
However, no general procedure exists
The addition of an alkyl group such as a methyl group or a
butyl group failed in some instances because the organometallic
reagent (e.9. , Me'CuLi) did not react with the bridgehead
halide.
halide when 1-bromoadamantane was treated with Me2CuLi .3
A case in point was the complete recovery o f starting
The
473
Copyright 0 1988 by Marcel Dekker, Inc
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
itaet
sbib
lioth
ek G
iess
en]
at 0
1:35
29
Oct
ober
201
4
474 KRAUS AND YI
reaction of some bridgehead tosylates with Grignard reagents at
elevated temperatures affords good yields o f the corresponding
1-alkyl bicyclooctanes and bicy~lononanes.~
reaction is limited by the narrow array of compatible functional
groups. Bridgehead bromides also react with trimethyl
al~minum.~
regard to both the halide and the organoaluminum reagent.
o f a study of the synthetic potential of bridgehead enones, we
have examined the reactions of organometallic reagents with in
situ derived bridgehead enones and report that good to excellent
yields o f conjugate addition products can be obtained with readily
available cuprate reagents.
However, this
The scope o f this interesting reaction is limited with
A s part
The bromoketones examined in this study were ketones 1 and
2. The preparation of compounds 1 and 2 has already been
described.6 While the corresponding bridgehead enones have been
generated using triethylamine in CH2C12 at O"C, only low yields
FH3
:8 OLi
1 X = H , R = B r 4 2 X = SPh, R = Br 3 X = H , R = C H 3
were obtained when triethylamine was added to a solution o f 1 and
lithium dimethylcuprate in ether at 0°C. Other soluble bases such
as potassium tert-butoxide and lithium 2,6-ditert-butyl-4-
methylphenoxide (4) ' gave much better yields. Surprisingly, the
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
itaet
sbib
lioth
ek G
iess
en]
at 0
1:35
29
Oct
ober
201
4
REACTION OF ORGANOCUPRATES WITH BRIDGEHEAD ENONES 475
Table 1
Entry RM (eq.) base X % yield Compound
Me2CuLi (2)
Me2CuLi (2)
Bu2CuLi (2)
Bu2CuLi (2)
Ph2CuLi (2 )
Ph2CuLi (1)
CH2=CHMgBr*Cu I (2.5)
MepCuLi (2.4)
CH2=CHMgBr-CuI (2.5)
tBuOK
-
tBuOK
-
4
-
tBuOK
4
4
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
SPh
SPh
ao 3
41
69 10
-
47 11
26
60 12
81 13
60 14
reaction o f 1 with two equivalents o f lithium dimethylcuprate
without added base also produced a good yield o f 3.
Our results are listed in Table 1. It i s clear that a
The variety o f groups can be introduced by this technique.
addition o f a vinyl group is particularly notable, in that this
versatile connective group can not be introduced by the bridgehead
carbocation methodology.
significant in that many classes of natural products such as the
The addition o f a methyl group is
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
itaet
sbib
lioth
ek G
iess
en]
at 0
1:35
29
Oct
ober
201
4
476 KRAUS AND YI
clovenes (5)8 and the beyeranes (6)' have a methyl group attached
to a bridgehead position.
5 6
In practice, 4 became the base of choice. It was always
freshly prepared as a solution in THF.
ether was a more effective solvent than THF. Lithium
diorganocuprates afforded better yields than their heterocuprate
analogs.
cuprous iodide was also effective and was used when the Grignard
reagent was more readily available than the organolithium
compound.
For the reaction, diethyl
The stoichiometric complex of a Grignard reagent wtih
Organocopper reagents (RCu) did not react.
The result with lithium dimethylcuprate without added base
prompted us to question our original assumption that an enone
intermediate was necessary.
of 1 with sodium borohydride.
ether solution at 0°C with lithium dimethylcuprate afforded a
compound in which a methyl group had been introduced." After
considerable analysis, the structure was assigned as alcohol 8, a
Compound 7a was prepared by reduction
The reaction of bromoalcohol 7a in
7a: R = H
7b: R = THP
OR
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
itaet
sbib
lioth
ek G
iess
en]
at 0
1:35
29
Oct
ober
201
4
REACTION OF ORGANOCUPRATES WITH BRIDGEHEAD ENONES 477
1:l mixture of diastereomers. This structure is supported by two
doublets around 1.2 ppm in the proton NMR and also by IR and mass
spectroscopy. Alcohol 8 was oxidized to ketone 9 with PCC. It
was produced as shown below. This type of fragmentation has
8
9
literature precedent."
was synthesized. When it was treated with lithium dimethyl-
cuprate, only unreacted halide was recovered, demonstrating the
need for a bridgehead enone intermediate.
In order to circumvent this reaction, 7b
The use o f cuprates to effect bridgehead alkylation of
bromoketones permits the introduction of several alkyl and alkenyl
groups.
intermediates in synthetic organic chemistry. It also makes
available new pathways by which natural products such as the
clovenes and the beyeranes can be constructed.
This work extends the versatility of bridgehead enone
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
Unless otherwise noted, materials were obtained from
commercial suppliers and were used without purification.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
itaet
sbib
lioth
ek G
iess
en]
at 0
1:35
29
Oct
ober
201
4
475 KRAUS AND YI
Dichlorumethane was distilled from phosphorus pentoxide.
spectra were determined on a Perkin-Elmer model 1320 spectro-
meter.
Varian EM 360 60 MHz instrument and on a Nicolet 300 MHz
instrument.
300 MHz instrument. High resolution mass spectra were determined
on a Kratos mass spectrometer.
Infrared I
Nuclear magnetic resonance spectra were determined on a
Carbon-13 NMR spectra were determined on a Nicolet
Alkylation reactions - General Procedure
To a solution o f enone 1 or 2 (1 eq) and the organometallic
reagent ( 2 eq) in diethyl ether (2 mL/mmol enone) at 0°C was added
4 (2 eq).
quenched with saturated ammonium chloride solution.
was partitioned between methylene chloride and water.
layer was then dried, concentrated and purified by chromatography
on silica gel using hexanes: ethyl acetate.
The solution was stirred at 0°C for 3-6 h and then
The product
The organic
1-Methyl bicyclo [ 3.3.11 nonan-3-one (3 )
NMR (CDC13) 6 : 1.02 ( s , 3 H), 1.15-1.95 (m, 8 H) , 2.10-2.70
(m, 4 H) , 3.08 ( b s , 1 H). I R (film): 1700, 1456, 1228, 1216
cm- . MS: m/e 41, 55, 67, 81, 95, 109, 137, 152. 1
l-Butylbicyclo[3.3.1]nonan-3-one (101
NMR (CDC13) 6: 0.80-1.90 (m, 18 H ) , 2.15-2.70 (m, 4 H). I R
(film): 1700, 1450, 1228 cm-l. MS: 55, 67, 81, 95, 109, 137,
151, 194.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
itaet
sbib
lioth
ek G
iess
en]
at 0
1:35
29
Oct
ober
201
4
-~ REACTiON OF ORGANOCUPRATES WITH BRIDGEHEAD ENONES 479
l-Phenylbicyclo[3.3.l]nonan-3-one (11)
NMR (CDC13) 6: 1.30-2.30 (m, 9 H ) , 2.40-2.75 (m, 4 H ) , 7.32
( s , 5 H) . I R (film): 1700, 1595, 1470, 910, 760 cm-'. MS: m/e
55, 67, 91, 157, 171, 214.
1-Ethenylbicyclo[ 3.3.llnonan-3-one (12)
NMR (CDC13) 6: 1.15-1.90 (my 9 H ) , 2.10-2.60 (m, 4 H ) , 4.75-
6.20 ( m y 3 H ) .
MS: m/e 55, 67, 81, 107, 164.
I R (film): 1700, 1630, 1400, 1215, 910 cm-'.
1-Methy 1 -8-pheny l t hi obi cycl o [ 3.3.1 ] nonan-3-one ( 13)
NMR (CDC13) 6: 1.20 (s , 3 H), 1.25-2.14 (m, 7 H ) , 2.20-3.10
(my 5 H) . I R (film): 1700, 1610, 1450, 1221 cm-l. MS: m/e 55,
67, 81, 93, 110, 133, 151, 260.
260.12349; found 260.12336.
HRMS: m/e for C16H200S calcd.
l-Ethenyl-8-phenylthiobicyclo[ 3.3.1joctan-3-one (14)
300 MHz NMR (CDC13) 6: 1.35-1.72 (my 3 H) , 1.78-1.95 (m, 4
H), 2.22-2.52 ( m y 3 H) , 2.85-2.95 (m, 1 H) , 3.00-3.10 (m, 1 H) ,
4.95-5.12 (my 2 H) , 5.82-6.03 (my 1 H), 7.14-7.30 (my 3 H ) , 7.34-
7.45 (m, 2 H). MS: m/e 55, 67, 77, 91, 105, 121, 136, 149, 163,
272. HRMS: m/e for C17HZ00S calcd. 272.12349; found 272.12368.
3-(2-0xopropyl)-methylenecyclohexane (9)
NMR (CDC13) 6: 0.90-2.55 (m, 11 H) , 2.14 (s, 3 H), 4.62 (bs,
2 H). I R (film): 1710, 1645, 1442, 1355, 1152 cm-l. MS: m/e
109, 137, 152.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
itaet
sbib
lioth
ek G
iess
en]
at 0
1:35
29
Oct
ober
201
4
KRAUS AND YI 480
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. We thank the National Institutes o f Health
(grant GM 33604) for financial assistance.
REFERENCES AND NOTES
1. Kraus, G. A.; Hon, Y.-S., J. Org. Chem., 1985, 50, 4605. House, H. 0.; Outcalt, R. J.; Haack, J. L.; VanDerVeer, 0. J-
Org. Chem., 1983, 3, 1654. Kraus, G. A.; Hon, Y.-S. J. Am. Chem. SOC., 1985, 107, 4341.
J. Am. Chem. SOC., 1984, 106, 2105. House, H. 0.; OeTar,
M. B.; VanDerVeer, 0. J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 116.
2.
Magnus, P.; Gallagher, T.; Brown, P.; Huffman, J. C.
3. Whitesides, G. M.; Fischer, W. F.; San Filippo, J , ; Bashe,
R. W.; House, H. 0. J. Am. Chem. SOC., 1969, 91, 4871. 4. Kraus, W.; Graf, H.-0. Synthesis, 1977, 461.
5. Della, E. W.; Bradshaw, T. K. J. Org. Chem., 1975, 40, 1638.
6. House, H. O., Outcalt, R. J.; Cliffton, M. 0. J. Org. Chem.,
1982, 47, 2413. J. Org. Chem., in review.
Kraus, G. A.; Hon, Y . 4 . ; Sy, J.; Raggon, J.
7. Corey, E. J.; Chen, R. H. K. J. Org. Chem., 1973, 3. 4086. 8. Doyle, P.; Ferguson, G.; Hawley, 0. M.; McKillop, T. F. W.;
Martin, 3.; Parker, W. 3. C. S. Chem. Comm., 1967, 1123.
9. Kitahara, Y.; Yoshikoshi, A. Tetrahedron Lett., 1964. 1771.
10. Posner, G. H.; Whitten, C. E.; McFarland, P. E. J. Am. Chem.
- SOC. 1972, 2, 5106, see reference 15. 11. For related fragmentations, see Clayton, R. B.; Henbest,
H. B.; Smith, M. J. Chem. S O C . , 1957, 1982. Marshall, J. A.;
Seitz, 0. E. J. Orq. Chem., 1974, 2, 1814.
Dow
nloa
ded
by [
Uni
vers
itaet
sbib
lioth
ek G
iess
en]
at 0
1:35
29
Oct
ober
201
4