24
The Radon EDM Experiment Timothy Chupp & Carl Svensson, co-spokesmen Gordon Ball, John Behr, Celia Cunningham, Greg Demand, Martin Djongolov, Paul Finley, Adam Garnsworthy, Paul Garrett, Katie Green, Greg Hackman, Mike Hayden, Carolyn Kierans, Jamie Kilkenny, Wolfgang Lorenzon, Matthew Pearson, Timothy Raben, Evan Rand, Chandana Sumithrarachchi, Eric Tardiff, Smarajit Triambak, Scott Williams, Jan Zirnstein Eric Tardiff WAPRA: June 3, 2009

The Radon EDM Experiment

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Radon EDM Experiment

The Radon EDM Experiment

Timothy Chupp & Carl Svensson, co-spokesmenGordon Ball, John Behr, Celia Cunningham, Greg Demand, Martin Djongolov, Paul

Finley, Adam Garnsworthy, Paul Garrett, Katie Green, Greg Hackman, Mike Hayden, Carolyn Kierans, Jamie Kilkenny, Wolfgang Lorenzon, Matthew Pearson,

Timothy Raben, Evan Rand, Chandana Sumithrarachchi, Eric Tardiff, Smarajit Triambak, Scott Williams, Jan Zirnstein

Eric TardiffWAPRA: June 3, 2009

Page 2: The Radon EDM Experiment

Outline• Sensitivity to CP-violation in the Radon system

- Octupole Enhancement in 223Rn

- Sensitivity relative to 199Hg

• The Radon EDM experimental design

- Polarizing radon through spin-exchange optical pumping

- NMR using anisotropies in the distribution of emitted radiation

• Future schedule and ongoing development work

Page 3: The Radon EDM Experiment

CP-Violation in Diamagnetic Atoms

Page 4: The Radon EDM Experiment

a: Flambaum & Zelevinsky, Phys. Rev. C 68, 035502 (2003)b: Spevak, Auerbach, and Flambaum, Phys. Rev. C 56, 1357 (1997)

S ~ 〈 +|η r3 cos θ|- 〉 ~ ηβ2β23ZA2/3r03

E+ - E- E+ - E-a

b

Octupole Enhancement

Page 5: The Radon EDM Experiment

The 199Hg Results

• The new 199Hg results quote improved limits on dp, ddC,CT, and CS.

• The 223Rn octupole enhancement of 400-600 is an advantage for EDM detection.

• We will need to be more precise than 1-2×10-26 to be more sensitive to CP violation.

• Due to the uncertainties in nuclear calculations for octupole deformed nuclei*, in the case of a null result we would have to be much more precise to improve on the 199Hg limits.

|d(199Hg)|= (0.49 ± 1.29 ± 0.76) × 10-29 e⋅cm

|d(199Hg)|< 3.1 × 10-29 e⋅cm

*Pospelov & Ritz, Ann. Phys. 318, 119-169 (2005)

Page 6: The Radon EDM Experiment

Using NMR Techniques to Measure an EDM

• Polarize the nuclei of the atoms of interest. We use spin exchange with optically pumped rubidium vapor.

• Apply a high voltage. After an RF pulse, the atoms precess at the frequency

• The difference in precession frequency with electric field orientation gives a measure of the EDM:

ħω± = 2μB ± 2dE

d = ħΔω / 4E

Page 7: The Radon EDM Experiment

Gamma-ray Anisotropies

• Polarized, radioactive nuclei emit gamma rays with calculable directional distributions.

jf=ji

δ

(W(0º)-W(90º))/(W(0º)+W(90º)) for jf=ji+1

W(θ)

θ

δ

W (θ) =14π

1+3

2 ji(2 ji −1)mi2ami

−13ji( ji +1)

mi

P2(cosθ)

jf=ji-1 pure dipole transition

jf=ji+1

W(θ)

θ

δ

Page 8: The Radon EDM Experiment

Stony Brook 209Rn Studies• The 223Rn source at TRIUMF is not yet available,

so we used the Stony Brook francium beam to produce 209Rn.

• 209Rn (I=5/2, T1/2=28.5 min) and 223Rn (I=7/2, T1/2=23.2 min) will exhibit similar relaxation mechanisms.

• Quadrupole relaxation is expected to be the dominant mechanism:

• Study 209Rn polarization to determine the implications for a 223Rn EDM measurement.

Γ2(T) = Γ2∞eT0 / T

Page 9: The Radon EDM Experiment

Radon Polarization Measurements

• Data were taken at cell temperatures from 130 to 220ºC

• Each radon measurement cycle was split into about 4 segments, alternating laser on and off.

• Find

• Octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS) coating was used, and the data indicated it was beneficial for the 209Rn polarization.€

R =0º /90º( ),LON0º /90º( ),LOFF

337 keV Data

Page 10: The Radon EDM Experiment

EDM Measurement Precision

• The expected statistical uncertainty in the EDM experiment is given by:

• Using E = 10 kV/cm, N = 1012, A = 0.1, B = 0.01, T2 = 12 s (based on the 209Rn measurements),

• δd of 3 × 10-26 e·cm is expected.

• With enhancement of 400-600, this should result in close to the same sensitivity to CP violation as 199Hg.

δd =h

2ET21

A2(1− B)2N

|d(199Hg)|< 3.1 × 10-29 e⋅cm

Page 11: The Radon EDM Experiment

RadonEDM at TRIUMF

RnEDM

Page 12: The Radon EDM Experiment

To Roughing System

Cell

Glass Valve

V3

Nitrogen Storage

V6V7

TurbopumpTP2

V5

Baratron Gas Loading Chamber

Convectron

Coldfinger

V2

V1

foil

V4

Cell Valve

IV2 IV0

Turbopump TP1

To Beamline

Ion beam

Page 13: The Radon EDM Experiment

Radiation Detection of NMR Signal

Page 14: The Radon EDM Experiment

Gas Transfer Tests• Used 123Xe (T1/2~2hrs) from a 123Cs

beam to test the efficiency of the gas transfer system.

• Cryopump from the foil directly into the cell.

• Warm the cell and cryopump to the coldfinger.

• Push the xenon into the cell with a jet of nitrogen.

• We also studied the dependence of the relative gamma-ray rates at the cell and coldfinger over a range of coldfinger temperatures to determine a wall binding energy for 123Xe: EB = 2.09(11)×103 K (preliminary result)

Prelim

inary

Prelim

inary

Page 15: The Radon EDM Experiment

Xenon AFP Diagnostics• Natural xenon contains

129Xe (I=1/2) and 131Xe (I=3/2).

• We can study the temperature dependence of dipole and quadrupole relaxation rates with two separate species in the same cell.

• Help determine the optimum temperature for isotopes affected by quadrupole relaxation.

• Study the reproducibility of the polarization signal over multiple fills.

Optical Pumping Cell

Oven

Helmholtz Coils

RF Coils

Pre-Amp

Lock-In Amplifier

USB-6009 ComputerMagnet Power Supply

Monitor

795 nm Diode Laser

Pickup Coils

RF Amplifier

Function Generator Function Generator

A input

B input

differential output, A-B

Page 16: The Radon EDM Experiment

Xenon AFP Signal

• We have begun the diagnostics at TRIUMF using a supply of natural xenon attached to the gas handling system.

• In anticipation of testing the polarization and detection apparatus using 121Xe, we will attempt to optimize the 131Xe polarization signal.

Page 17: The Radon EDM Experiment

Relative Peak-Height Results• Preliminary studies at

Michigan indicated that an OTS-coated cell had a larger 131Xe polarization signal relative to 129Xe.

• This is consistent with our conclusions from the 209Rn polarization data.

• OTS coatings are known to be beneficial for 129Xe polarization.

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

Rela

tive P

eak H

eig

ht,

13

1/1

29

200180160140120

Cell Temperature (ºC)

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0.0

Rela

tive P

eak H

eig

ht,

13

1/1

29

200180160140120

Cell Temperature (ºC)

Uncoated Cell

Coated Cell

Page 18: The Radon EDM Experiment

Future Schedule• Upcoming work at TRIUMF:

– July 9-14, 2009: Collect and polarize 121Xe (from a 121Cs beam) to measure polarization transients. J121=5/2

– Fall 2009: Actinide Target will be ready, allowing 221,223Rn (from At beams)• use 8π apparatus to measure the nuclear structure of multiple radon

isotopes• measure ΔE to experimentally determine the EDM enhancement

• 2010: Xenon free precession measurement using a good magnet and 2+ Tigress modules

• 2011: Start Radon EDM measurements

Page 19: The Radon EDM Experiment

Ongoing and Future Development Work

• EDM cell development: minimizing leakage currents.

• Design cells that will allow for beta asymmetry measurements: can run in current mode, so we won’t be count rate limited.

• Decide on an isotope to use as a co-magnetometer.• Build a deep UV laser that will allow direct

polarization of the radon atoms.

Page 20: The Radon EDM Experiment

Summary• OTS-coated cells appear to be beneficial for

polarizing isotopes sensitive to quadrupolar wall interactions.

• We should be able to measure the 223Rn EDM with a sensitivity of 10-26 e⋅cm or better.

• The octupole enhancements make this competitive with the 199Hg system.

Page 21: The Radon EDM Experiment

Modeling Polarization• Can calculate the expected

angular distribution of gamma rays as a function of spin-exchange and relaxation rates.

• The spin-exchange rate γSE depends on the Rb density, which depends on cell temperature, and the spin-exchange cross-section.

• The dipole and quadrupole relaxation rates, Γ1 and Γ2, must be determined from data.

• Γ2 dominates the relaxation, so Γ1 is set to zero.

-5/2 -3/2 -1/2 +1/2 +3/2 +5/21/7γSEρ+ 8/35γSE ρ+ 8/35γSE ρ+ 1/7γSEρ+9/35γSE ρ+

1/7γSEρ- 1/7γSEρ-8/35γSE ρ-8/35γSE ρ- 9/35γSE ρ-

1/21Γ1 1/21Γ18/105Γ1 8/105Γ13/35Γ1

1/28Γ2

1/28Γ2

9/140Γ2

9/140Γ2

1/14Γ2 1/14Γ21/35Γ2 1/35Γ2

ρ± = (1± PRb) /2

Γ2(T) = Γ2∞eT0 / T

Page 22: The Radon EDM Experiment

Modeling Polarization• Quadrupole relaxation should be the dominant mechanism.• As a first approximation, set Γ1=0, calculate γSE for a given

T, and calculate the expected anisotropies.

W(0º)/W(90º) W(0º)/W(90º)

Γ1 Γ1Γ2 Γ2

jf=ji+1 jf=ji

γSE = [Rb] σSEv

[Rb] =109.318− 4040

T /kBT

Page 23: The Radon EDM Experiment

123Xe Wall Binding Energy

0.0085 0.0090 0.0095 0.0100 0.0105 0.0110 0.01150.01

0.1

1

123Xe on Stainless Steel(T

CF/T

cell)1/

2 R

CF/R

cell

1/T (1/K)

preliminary result: EB=2.09(11) x 103 K

(using revised Temperature Calibration)

Page 24: The Radon EDM Experiment

14x103

12

10

8

6

Counts

per

bin

6050403020100

Time (s)

12x103

10

8

Counts

per

bin

201816141210

Time (s)

12x103

10

8

Counts

per

bin

201816141210

Time (s)