18
The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University [email protected] Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group [email protected]

The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University [email protected] Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group [email protected]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State

[email protected]

Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group

[email protected]

Page 2: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

boli – complementizer strategy

boli as reported speech marker may only be introduced by a verb of speech;

(Especially clear in the cases where the lexical verb of speech is bos (RS + boli bo/boli). Same is (less convincingly) true of the extended uses of boli in purposive clauses - even though circumstancial, not introduced by a matrix verb)

unlike converb/evidential boli, may not have its own arguments

Page 3: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

Summary of strategies

1st person (I /we said that...) + RSC boli bo / bo (all forms)

2nd person (you said that...) + RSC boli bo / bo (all forms)

3rd person (he/she/they said that...) + RSC

-(e)r / boli (bo) / bo (all forms)

Page 4: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

-er strategy – complementizer?

Possesses predicative properties:

introduces its own arguments (speaker and addressee); may result in having several ergatives in what seems to be one clause

may have its own auxiliary

Page 5: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

-er strategy – subordinating verb of

speech?A contra: it is cliticized to the reported

speech clause

underwent phonetic change (wa-r -> -er) triggers word internal sandhi (-u+e- -> -o-)

Page 6: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

-er strategy

Possesses predicative properties:

introduces its own arguments (speaker and addressee may have its own auxiliary

but:

is a closely bound clitic

Page 7: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

-er strategy

[ … V ]RS=QUOT-CVB AUX

syntactic

group

morphosyntactic word

phonological word

Page 8: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

Options available:subordination (I)

‘say’

speaker

(agentive)

addressee

(addressive)

reported clause

(assumed P)

Page 9: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

Options available:subordination (II)

‘say’

speaker

(agentive or patientive)

addressee

(patientive or addressive)

reported clause

(non-argumental)

Page 10: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

Options available:parataxis

‘say’

speaker

(agentive or patientive)

addressee

(patientive or addressive)

reported speech clause

Page 11: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

Options available:quotative particle

QUOT

reported clause

[… … … …]

Page 12: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

Options available:

subordination I

subordination II

parataxis

quotative particle

verb of speech domi-nates reported speech

reported speech domi-nates verb of speech

Page 13: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

reported speech

predicate of speech with its

arguments

mor

phos

ynta

ctic

dom

inat

ion

morp

hop

hon

ologi

cal

dom

ination

triggering logophorics in the RS clause

cliticization to the RS clause

Page 14: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

What is it like?Overlap of two essentially different components – description of the reported speech act and the content of the reported speech. The two components are not juxtaposed – they are intertwined:

well,

he said

who will be able,

he said

them in front of everbody

to kill

headman

reported speech act

reported speech

linear order

Page 15: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

What is it like?Overlap of two essentially different components – description of the reported speech act and the content of the reported speech. The two components are not juxtaposed – they are intertwined:

reported speech act

reported speech

why you did not stay he said

to mow the field

he aux (was saying)

linear order

Page 16: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

Conclusion:

Pfv converb of the speech verb (boli)

Contracted ipfv form of the speech verb (-er)

Speech complementiz

er

Its extensions

(purposive)

Predicative clitic

Quotative particle

(floating, repetition, loss of argument licensing)

Page 17: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

PS: what we think about when we talk about reported

speech.

Semidirect-ness!

Page 18: The Quotative in Archi Michael Daniel, Moscow State University misha.daniel@gmail.com Marina Chumakina, Surrey Morphology Group m.tchoumakina@surrey.ac.uk

Thank you (they said)