Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
I LLINOIUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN
PRODUCTION NOTE
University of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign Library
Large-scale Digitization Project, 2007.
S
The Population Biology of Torreya taxifolia:Habitat Evaluation, Fire Ecology, and
Genetic Variability
Mark W. Schwartz and Sharon M. Hermann
Center for BiodiversityTechnical Report 1992(Z)
Illinois Natural History Survey607 E. Peabody Drive
Champaign, Illinois 61820
Tall Timbers, Inc.Route 1, Box 678
Tallahassee, Florida 32312
Prepared forFlorida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission
Nongame Wildlife Section620 S. Meridian Street
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1600
Project Completion ReportNG89-030
TABLE OF CONTENTSpage
Chapter 1: Species background and hypotheses for.......5the decline of Torreya taxifolia,
species Background ....... . . . . . .. . . . .6
Hypotheses for the Decline........0Changes in the Biotic Environment ...... 10Changes in the Abiotic Environment ..... 13
Discu~ssion *0o ** eg. *.*. *.0.*09 0 0 6 0 o**** o*...21
Chapter 2: The continuing decline of Torreyap iola....2Study.Area and Methods ooo................25Results * ** ** ** ** ** ** .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .30
Chapter 3: Genetic variability in Torreya taxif-olia......4Methods.......................* 0 C 0 0 o49Results . . . . . . . ...... *oe*.........o51
-0L-icmion *.. ~ 0000 00000@55
Management _Recommendations .000000000000.0.60
Chapter 4: The light relations of Tgr .taz'ifgli with ..... 62special emphasis on the relationship to growthand,,disease-
Methods o..............0.0.0.0.0.00.eoo63Light and Growth . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .64
Measurements'-of photosynthetic rates 0,.65
Light and Growth . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .69
Measurements of photosynthetic rates ..71.Discussion....... .. . . . . *0* * * * * * * ** . 81
Chapter 5: The foliar fungal associates of Torreya............85ta ifola: pathogenicity and
susceptibility to smokeMethods 0 0 0 ... 0..0.....0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0. *8 6
Fungal Isolation 00000-0900960000000690086Pathogenicity Tests *00000....00.0.0.087
Fungal.Susceptibility to Smoke ........ 87Field Tests of Smoke Hypothesis ....... 90
Results............00000000000000 .000000000*91Fungal Isolation and Pathogenicity ....91,Smoke Susceptibility ..... oo............92
Discussion..................000 00000000000098
2
FIGURES
Chapter 1 page1.1 Range Map of Torreya taxifolia ........................... 71.2 Annual Precipitation in Blountstown, FL, 1922-1982 ...... 141.3 Water Temperature Data, Above and Below Lake Seminole ...16
1.4 Air Temperature Data, Blountstown, FL, 1931-1984 ........ 18
Chapter 22.1 Range Map Detailing Study Areas ......................... 262.2 Stem Size Distribution for Census Population ............ 31.2.3 Number of Stems per Individual .......................... 31
2.4 Distribution of T. taxifolia With Respect to Elevation ..342.5 Distribution With Respect to Canopy Cover ............ 342.6 Distribution With Respect to Aspect ..................... 342.7 Apparent Age Distribution of Census Population .......... 362.8 Age Correction Regression ............................... 36
Chapter 33.1 Map of Sampled Populations..............................50BLANK PAGE ............. .. . *****. .* * * . * * .. ************** 533.2 Cluster Diagram of Populations .......................... 58
Chapter 44.1 Comparison of Growth by Light ........................... 704.2 Light Saturation Photosynthesis Curve ................... 734.3 Photosynthetic Rates of Diseased Versus Healthy Needles .744.4 Photosynthetic Rates by Needle Age ...................... 754.5 Light Saturation Curves for Five Closely Related Species.774.6 Photosynthetic Rates Across Relative Humidity, 5 Species.784.7 Photosynthetic Rates Across Temperature, 5 Species ...... 794.8 Rate of Water Loss in Absence of Watering, 5 Species ....804.9 Photosynthetic Rates Across. Water Stress, 5 Species ..... 80
Chapter 55.1 Smoke Residue Deposition Versus Time Treatment .......... 895.2 Effects of Direct Smoke Treatment on Fungal Growth ...... 935.3 Effects of Smoke Residue on Fungal Growth ............... 94
5.4 Effects of Smoke Residue on Spore Germination Rate ...... 95
5.5 Effects of Smoke Residue on Spore concentration ......... 96
5.6 Effects of Smoke Residue on Spore'Growth Rate ........... 97
Chapter 6None
TABLES
Chapter 1 page1.1 Fungal Associates of Torreya taxifolia .................. 91.2 Hypotheses for the Decline of T. taxifolia ............. ll
Chapter 22.1 Census Population ...................................... 282.2 Mean Length of Longest Stem, by Population ............. 332.3 Frequency of Disease Symptoms .......................... 382.4 Growth Fate of T. taxifolia, by Size Class ............. 382.5 Growth Fate of T. taxifolia, by Disease Load ........... 42
Chapter 33.1 Allele Frequencies for Enzymes Studied ................. 523.2 Heterogeneity of Sampled Populations ................... 543.3 Genetic Distance Between Sampled Populations ........... 563.4 Genetic Diversity Within and Between Populations ....... 57
Chapter 44.1 Growth Fate of Trees in Different Canopy Cover Classes .724.2 Disease Incidence of Trees in Canopy Cover Classes ..... 72
Chapter 55.1 Fungi Isolated From T. taxifolia Used in Experiments ...89
Chapter 6None
CHAPTER 1
Species background and hypotheses for
the decline of Torreva taxifolia
During the late 1950's, Torreya taxifolia suffered from a
catastrophic decline, presumably fungal in origin, that decimated
adult populations throughout its range (Godfrey and Kurz 1962).
The cause of this decline remains a mystery; no specific pathogen
has been implicated (Alfieri et al. 1967, USFWS 1986); the
predominant speculation is that any of a combination of several
environmental changes rendered T. taxifolia more susceptible to
native pathogens (USFWS 1986). Four hypotheses for the cause of
the decline of T. taxifolia have been proposed (Alfieri et al.
1967, Toops 1981, Barnes 1985, USFWS 1986). Correlative evidence
to address two of these hypotheses is presented here. In
addition, five new hypotheses for the decline, and evidence to
assess two of these hypotheses, are presented here. Direct
evidence to adequately test any of the hypotheses is mostly
lacking because no healthy individuals remain in the wild, no
undisturbed habitat remains, and the primary pathogen eludes
discovery. With this lack of direct evidence, we are left to
piece together anecdotal and correlative evidence as to the cause
of the dieback.
Providing management to facilitate recovery of T. taxifolia
is also hindered by a lack of sufficient information. The purpose
5
of this chapter is to discuss the relative merits of different
hypotheses proposed to explain the decline. The results presented
here point toward management recommendations despite an inherent
inability for adequate testing of virtually any hypothesis. This
chapter discusses, by example, the difficulty in isolating
pathogen-induced declines in endangered species, and how to
approach management recommendations given this information gap.
SPECIES BACKGROUND
Florida torreya (T. taxifolia, Taxaceae) is an endemic
conifer restricted to ravine slopes along the eastern side of the
Apalachicola River in the central panhandle of Florida (Figure
1.1). This dioecious evergreen tree can grow up to 20m in height
at maturity (Godfrey 1988) and was formerly a common understory
tree in the region (Chapman 1885, Harper 1914, Reinsmith 1934,
Kurz 1838a, 1938b). The ravine habitats which support T.
taxifolia are characterized by a diverse mixture of hardwoods and
conifers, most notably beech (Fagus grandifolia), and magnolia
(Magnolia grandiflora), along with various oaks and hickories
along upper slopes (Platt and Schwartz 1990, Schwartz 1990).
Several factors reduced the abundance of the species prior
to the decline. In the 1800s, T.. taxifolia was cut along the
Apalachicola River for fuel (Chapman 1885, Gray 1889), and for
fenceposts and shingles through the 1900s (Chapman 1885,
Reinsmith 1934, Kurz 1938b, Burke 1978). However, T. axifolia
only became endangered after a catastrophic decline during the
1950s. This decline is thought to have been caused by fungal
Figure 2.2.. The range of Torreya taxifolia, including an outlyingpopulation in the vicinity of Lake Ocheese-e. Habitat featuresdigitized from 1953 and 1955 USDA aerial photographs usingARC/INFO ver 5.0. Tgrreya~tYa x±i.I is restricted within itsrange to floodplain and ravine habitats.
Rangeof Torreya taxifolia
Suitable Habitat*Floodplain
flRavines
Other Land Cover*Towns
SAgriculture
ElForested Uplands
ILa Uswe kemined From USOA kqIW PhonogrrKgy, 1953-105
10 KM
r -r 1
pathogens, although no primary pathogen has been identified
(Godfrey & Kurz 1962, Alfieri et al. 1967, 1984). The apparent
lack of an introduced pest is unusual among catastrophic diebacks
of fungal origin (Manion 1981). By 1962, virtually no adult T.
taxifolia remained in the wild (Godfrey and Kurz 1962). Recent
censuses indicate that approximately 1000 juveniles, and no
adults, remain in the wild (Baker 1982, Chapter 2). Most
individuals in the wild are less than 2 m tall, are sexually
immature, and carry symptoms of foliar diseases (Chapter 2).
Few specifics were recorded about the decline of the Tv
taxifolia. The earliest observation of disease symptoms may have
been in 1938 (Nieland, pers. comm. as cited in Alfieri al.
1967), however, other reports from this decade make no mention of
disease (Reinsmith 1934, Kurz 1938a, 1938b). The next report of
disease came from Torreya State Park in 1955 (USFWS 1986). By the
time the decline was first documented, adult populations had
already been decimated (Godfrey. and Kurz 1962). No information is
available on the rate of the decline, exact symptoms of disease,
or the location of any disease epicenter if one existed.
Symptoms of disease in T. taxifolia at present are needle
spots, needle necrosis and stem cankers (Chapter 2). Early
reports of disease cited low vigor and needle blight (Godfrey &
Kurz 1962). The fungal associates isolated from L. taxifolia do
not include introduced obvious pathogens (Table 1.1). The
recovery plan for T. taxifolia (USFWS 1986) cites the lack of an
introduced pathogen to suggest that environmental changes may
Table 1.1. A list of potential fungal associates of Torreyataxifolia, including species isolated from diseased tissue (A),as well as fungi hypothesized to be in association with T.taxifolia (B) (from Alfieri et al. 1967, 1984).
A) Fungi isolated from Torreya taxifolia
1) Phyllosticta sp. (needle spot)*2) Macrophoma sp. (needle blight)*3) Fusarium sp. (root rot)*4) Pestalotia natens (needle spot)*5) Acremonium sp. (?)*6) Botrosphaeria sp. (needle spot)7) Xvlocoremium flabelliforme (?)*
8) Sclerotium rolfsii (southern blight)9) Rhizoctonia solani (root rot)
10) Sphaeropsis sp. (needle blight)
11) Physalospora sp. (twig and needle blight) ?
B) Fungi hypothesized to be associated with . taxifolia
12) Alternaria sp. (needle spot)13) Diplodia natalensis (twig dieback)14) Pythium sp. (root rot)15) Phytophthora cinnamomi (root rot)
* - tested for pathogenicity with negative results
9
have created plant stress, which in turn may have rendered T.
taxifolia more susceptible to infection by native pathogens. The
native pathogen hypothesis requires additional framework because
these pathogens generally do not reach epidemic proportions
unless the host plants are under stress (Schoeneweiss 1978).
HYPOTHESES FOR THE DECLINE
Four previously proposed hypotheses along with five new
hypotheses are presented (Table 1.2). Very little data can be
brought to bear directly upon many of these hypotheses. Each of
these nine hypotheses is briefly discussed, citing any evidence,
upon which to assess the validity of the hypotheses.
HYPOTHESES RELATED TQ CHANGES IM THE BIOTIC ENVIRONMENT
Al Introduced Fungal Pathogen
Exotic pathogens could invade the range of T. taxifolia in
any of a number of ways. Perhaps the most likely means for
introduction of a pathogen that could have caused die-back in T.
taxifolia was through slash pine plantations in uplands adjacent
to ravines. Conifer plantations have been implicated in diebacks
elsewhere (Struhsaker et al. 1989), and slash pine was heavily
planted during the 1950s in the uplands of the southern end of
the range of T. taxifolia. Aerial photographs indicate that
approximately 36 % of the land within the range of T. taxifolia
is forested uplands (Figure 1); most of these forested uplands
became pine plantations during the 1950s.
The introduced fungus Phytophthora cinnamomi, which causes
little leaf disease in southern pines, has been proposed as a
10
Table 1.2. Nine hypotheses proposed to explain the decline ofTorreya taxifolia and the data related to assessing thesehypotheses.
HYPOTHESIS SOURCE EVIDENCE
Introduced Fungus Alfieri et al. 1967 Anecdotal evidencedoes not support
__________________________hypothesis
Pathogen Vectors Schwartz 1990 Very poor evidence
Water Stress USFWS 1986 Climate recordssupport hypothesisby showing a dryperiods associatedwith time ofdecline.
Microclimatic USFWS 1986 USGS water tempera-Warming Toops 198* ture data do not
support hypothesisas proposed.
Regional Warming new Climate recordshows no warmingtrend, potentialcooling of wintertemperatures. Doesnot support hypo-thesis.
Hydrologic Changes USFWS 1986 No evidence of theeffect of hydro-
____________________logic changes.
Fire Suppression Schwartz 1990 Weak supportiveevidence.
Air Pollution new No evidence.
Fungal Pathogens as new No evidence.an epiphenomenon_________________
11
possible introduced pathogen of T. taxifolia (Alfieri et al.
1967, USFWS 1986). This root-rotting fungus, which is thought to
have been introduced from Australia (Pratt et al. 1973), is known
in northern Florida (Barnard, pers. comm.). Its pathogenicity on
T. taxifolia is untested, but has been suggested to be associated
with the decline (USFWS 1986).
Two pieces of evidence suggest that P. cinnamomi is not
associated with T. taxifolia at the present time. First, roots of
T. taxifolia that were examined by myself and others in the field
appear healthy. Second, Barnard (unpubl. data) examined soil
samples from around the base of 17 diseased T. taxifolia. He
failed to isolate P. cinnamomi, or any other obvious pathogen,
using techniques that had previously been successful in other
north Florida soil samples. No other introduced fungus has been
postulated as a pathogen.
_i1 Changes in Resource use hy Pathogen Vectors
Torreya taxifolia suffers stem damage by deer as antler
rubs. The conversion of uplands to pine plantations in the 1950s
entailed total clearcuts. Earlier harvests of longleaf pine had
been restricted to canopy trees, leaving juveniles to regenerate.
Deer, which are abundant in the region, prefer soft-barked
coniferous trees for antler rubs. The removal of young pines from
the uplands may have increased the use of T. taxifolia by deer.
In turn, wounds inflicted by deer may have increased the rate of
fungal infection and facilitated the spread of disease. While
nearly all larger individuals carry scars from past deer rubs,
12
the lack of a pathogen prevents testing of this hypothesis.
Cl Fungal Pathogens as Epiphenomenon of Decline
There is no guarantee that the symptoms of disease that are
now observed on T. taxifolia bear any direct connection to the
cause of the decline. Some pathogen, not now found on T.
taxifolia, may have swept through the region causing the decline.
If such a pathogen is now missing, or at very low densities, we
would likely not detect its presence.
HYPOTHESES RELATED TO CHANGES IN THE ABIOTIC ENVIRONMENT
DI Water Stress
Barnes (1985) suggests that drought may have stressed T.
taxifolia, making them more susceptible to facultative diseases.
Water stress is known to predispose plants to disease (Yarwood
1959, Parker 1965, Cook 1973, Schoeneweiss 1975, 1978, Griffin
1978) as well as weaken a plant's ability to survive fungal
infection (Ayres 1978, Burdon 1987). Hepting (1963) and
Schoeneweiss (1978) cite numerous examples of secondary pathogens
causing stem cankers in birch, maple, and oak during drought
years. The foliar fungi isolated from T. taxifolia fit the
general description of secondary pathogens (Alfieri et al 1967,
1984, Schwartz 1990). Secondary pathogens have been observed to
become primary pathogens under conditions of plant stress
(Schoeneweiss 1975, 1978).
Weather records from Blountstown show low annual rainfall in
1938 and 1953, years near when disease was recorded in T.
taxifolia (Figure 1.2). Although drought may have contributed to
13
Figure 1.2. Annual precipitation recorded from BlountstownFlorida, adjacent to the natural range of Torreya taxifolia. Thedrought year most closely associated with the time of the declineis highlighted.
•JE
Blountstown Station
1953
1940 1960
Year
1980
Inches
80
70"
601
40
30-192 0
. •- r •.
90-
I
the fungal disease, drought seems insufficient as the sole
explanation for the decline. The droughts of 1938 and 1953 were
not unusual for the period between 1922 and 1982 (Figure 1.2).
Because rainfall varies widely in north Florida, adult trees,
which live an excess of 100 years, must survive several droughts
as severe as those of 1938 and 1953 to reach maturity.
EL Microclimatic Warming
Lake Seminole drains into the Apalachicola River at the
northern limit of T. taxifolia. Construction of the Woodruff dam,
which created Lake Seminole in 1956, approximately coincided with
the decline. The dam-related hypothesis is based on changes in
Apalachicola ravine microclimate and flooding patterns (Toops
1981). This hypothesis proposes that water in Lake Seminole
warms, raising temperatures in the Apalachicola River. The warmer
river, in turn, raises ravine air temperatures in what may
already have been a marginal micro-climate for T. taxifolia
(Toops 1981).
This hypothesis is subject to verification through direct
observation. Water gauge temperature data collected by the United
States Geological Survey (USGS) from above (in the Flint and
Chattahoochee Rivers) and below Lake Seminole showed no
difference over the 25 year period from which data are available
(Figure 1.3). With no change in water temperature, we have no
evidence of changes in ravine microclimate that can be attributed
to Lake Seminole.
15
Figure 1.3. Water temperature records, by calendar date, for theFlint, Chattahoochee and Apalachicola Rivers. The Flint andChattahoochee stations are immediately above Lake Seminole, andrepresent the major inputs to the lake. The Apalachicola Riverstation is immediately below Woodruff Dam. The Flint andChattahoochee Rivers form the Apalachicola River at theirconfluence.
* Apalachicola Staton (below Lake Seminose)
0 Chaftahoochee Station (above lake Seminole)
A Flint Rivr Station (above Lake Seminoie)
30
Degrees(Celsius)
204
10 a
0Jan Mar May Jul
I-
Sep
Month
Data from 1960 - 1985
I
Nov
*
I
fgRejional1 Climatic Warming -
Temperatures in the eastern U.S. were cooler during the 19th
century (Wahl 1968). It is possible that the decline was driven
by a marginally warmer and drier climate during the 20th century
that has made the ravine habitats unsuitable for T. taxifolia.
Weather records from the nearby Blountstown station show no trend
in mean summer temperature during the monitoring period of 1931
through 1982 (Figure 1.4). Although mean winter temperatures
appear to decrease over this period. If climate change did
contribute to the decline, then it most likely has been a long
continuous slow process that predates the catastrophic die-back
of the 1950's.
iHydrgloi -changeHydrologic changes within ravines might account for the
decline (USFWS 1986). Conversion of longleaf pine uplands to
slash pine plantations, during the 1950's, entailed extensive
site preparation in the southern third of the range of T.
taxifolia. Ravine temperatures may have risen as a result of the
highly reflective bare mineral sand exposed from site
preparation. Further, the lack of vegetative cover would have
reduced evapotranspiration and perhaps lowered humidity in the
adjacent ravines (USFWS 1986). Sparse vegetative cover would have
altered runoff flow, and soil disturbance overland sheetf low of
water.
This hypothesis is somewhat unsatisfactory because the
extent of upland clearing varied across the range. Large tracts
17
This page is intentionally blank.
Figure 1.4. Mean maximum and minimum temperatures for summer(June-August) and winter (December-January) months from 1932 to1982 as measured in Blountstown, Florida.
---- Summer, max.
-]--- Summer, min.
---- Winter, max.
-- *- Winter, min.
Year
100
80
60
(1
c%,._
CLE--CO
03
40
201I W--
of uplands adjacent to ravines were not converted to slash pine.
We might, therefore, predict that T. taxifolia found in Torreya
State Park, or in the outlying population along Lake Ocheesee,
would have been less affected by the decline, yet these
individuals were susceptible.
HI iU Pollution
The establishment of pine plantations in the 1950's was
coincidental with the construction of several paper mills in the
north Florida region. The pollutants from these paper mills may
have reduced the pH of local precipitation. There is no direct
information available on how reduced pH may effect disease
inception in T. taxifolia.
11 Fire Suppression
The suppression of fire, which effectively began in the
1950s, could have had a direct effect on the onset and severity
of the T. taxifolia decline. Natural fire frequencies in pineland
habitats of north Florida are estimated to occur at 1-3 year
intervals (Komarek 1964, 1968, Robbins & Myers 1989). Historical
accounts cite the use of near annual fire by both Native
Americans and Europeans in Florida (Tebeau 1980, Pyne 1982). This
frequent fire regime was halted under fire suppression that began
in the 1950s.
Although T. taxifolia grows in a relatively nonflammable
ravine habitat, it could have been affected by fire suppression
in two ways. First, fire suppression allowed upslope portions of
ravines to become more heavily wooded. Thus, lower portions of
19
the slopes became more heavily shaded than prior to fire
suppression. Increased shading may inhibit recovery through
slower growth rates and lower plant vigor (see Chapter 4).
Second, fire may have had an indirect effect on ravine
habitats by way of smoke settlement. Ravine habitats are lower
and cooler than the surrounding uplands. During the evening,
smoke from upland fires settles into such low-lying areas. The
smoke generated from large fires is extensive, and anecdotal
reports cite smoke settling so thick at ground level that one
could not drive a car at night.
Smoke is used as a preservative of meats and other goods
because it inhibits the growth of fungi and bacteria (Parmeter &
Uhrenholt 1975a). Experimental evidence indicates that smoke
residue on fungal growth media decreases spore germination and
mycelial growth of many fungi (Melching et al. 1974, Parmeter &
Uhrenholt 1975a, 1975b, Mihail 1979, Zagory & Parmeter 1984). The
deleterious effect of smoke on Fusarium lateritium, the only
fungus that has a demonstrable pathogenic effect on T. taxifolia,
is particularly pronounced (Zagory & Parmeter 1984). Thus, the
frequent and consistent presence of smoke in ravines may have
served as a chemical defense and fire suppression may have
initiated a fungal outbreak throughout the range (Chapter 5).
The smoke hypothesis may fit well if, in fact, foliar
pathogens are responsible for the decline. Needle infections do
not spread within the vascular tissue of the plant; instead, each
needle requires a separate penetration of the stomata by inoculum
20
(Parmeter pers. comm.). Massive infections of needle tissue may
be required before trees are adversely affected. Fire suppression
in the uplands might have allowed populations of needle pathogens
to explode within the ravines.
DISCUSSION.
Each year new research describes how air pollution, global
warming, habitat degradation, and other human-caused changes in
the environment can effect biodiversity (e.g., Melillo et al.
1990, Warrington and Whittaker 1990, Woodwell 1990). Discerning
exactly how changes in the environment effect species health,
however, can be exceedingly complex (Schoenewiess 1975, Bormann
1990). For example, researchers remain divided over the mechanism
responsible for the decline of forests in New England and
northern Europe (Bormann 1990).
The list of fungal isolates of T. taxifolia presented here
varies somewhat from previous studies (Alfieri et al 1967, USFWS
1986). Three explanations arise for these differences. First,
native trees were used for these experiments, while previous
studies used trees growing in the wild as well as trees in lawns,
at Maclay Gardens and on the campus of the University of Florida
(Alfieri et al 1967, El-Gholl personal communication). These
trees outside the natural range are likely to be vectors of other
horticultural diseases that may not infect wild trees. Second,
Alfieri et al. (1967) list several species only hypothesized to
be in association with L taxifolia. Thus, this list of fungal
isolates may be more accurate, with one exception. Phyllosticta
21
sp. was previously isolated from ascopores on needles in the wild
(Alfieri et al. 1967), and was tested for pathogenicity before
with negative results (El-Gholl 1984). Finally, Alfieri et al
(1967) did not list fungi that they perceived to be secondary
pathogens (El-Gholl, personal communication).
The nine hypotheses for the decline of T taxifolia have
been summarized (Table 1.2). One hypothesis (microclimatic
warming) can be dismissed as a result of the evidence presented
here. Three of the hypotheses (introduced fungus, deer vector and
hydrologic change) may be related to the conversion to plantation
pine during the late 1950s. This conversion focused on the
southern third of the range of T. taxifolia, and thus generates a
prediction of a specific spatial pattern to the spread of
disease. For these hypotheses the disease should have spread from
relative epicenters, or had differential effects across the range
of the species. In contrast, the four remaining hypotheses (water
stress, regional climate change, air pollution and fire
suppression) predict a synchronous decline throughout the range.
Although anecdotal accounts from residents seem to suggest a
synchronous decline, we do not have sufficient historical records
to determine if the disease spread from a single locus or was
immediately widespread.
These nine hypotheses are not mutually exclusive. Further, a
single causative agent of the T. taxifolia decline need not be
isolated in order to develop a plan for the recovery. However,
several of the factors I have described do not lend themselves to
22
management efforts for recovery. Air pollution, regional climatic
change, and drought are phenomenon that cannot be locally
controlled, reducing the ability to manage for on-site recovery.
Past hydrologic changes may affect the future of T. taxifolia in
ways that we can neither predict nor control at this time.
Finally, it would be difficult to control an introduced pathogen
without identification.
In contrast, the deer vector and fire suppression hypotheses
point to management opportunities for on-site recovery. Whether
or not deer act as a vector of disease in T. taxifolia, the
antler rubs increase stem mortality. Deer populations can be
reduced, alternative antler rub species can be replaced in the
uplands, or individual T. taxifolia may be protected using
exclosures. Fire management can be restored to the uplands. Both
of these factors are currently being addressed through management
of local preserves by The Nature Conservancy.
This chapter points to several difficulties with respect to
species declines. Isolating disease agents, and factors that
enhance the virulence of these pathogens, is exceedingly
difficult. Yet, the environment faces an ever widening array of
environmental changes through air pollution, climate change,
continued deforestation, and disruption of natural disturbance
processes. The example of T. taxifolia is illustrative because it
demonstrates how difficult disease assessment can be. This
difficulty in discerning disease agents is enhanced when dealing
with an endangered species.
23
CHAPTER TWO
The continuing Population Decline
of Torreya Taxifolia
Although extinction or near obliteration of populations and
species has been of interest to biologists for centuries,
attempts to closely monitor and assess such processes are common
only during the last few decades. Many of these recent studies
focus on endangered species; demographic data on rare plants is
increasingly utilized as a tool in conservation efforts aimed at
preventing extinction and enhancing existing populations (Davy
and Jeffries 1981),o Anecdotal information may suggest the need
for closer inspection or hint at possible remedies, but
quantified data is needed to accurately assess the health of a
population (Travis and Sutter 1986). This may be especially true
for long-lived species where the population decline may be slow.
In addition, individuals of perennial plants may decline in vigor
long before mortality actually occurs. Woody species provide a
semi-persistent record of individual decline that can be used to
monitor fluctuation at both the individual and population levels.
In the United States there has been documentation of
catastrophic decline or extinction of various woody species. One
of the earliest examples is of a small tree (Franklinjia
alatamaha), endemic to a narrow range in coastal Georgia, that
has not been seen in the wild in over 200 years. Over-collecting
has been suggested as the reason for its disappearance (Harper
24
and Leeds 1937) but neither the cause nor the pattern of decline
was actually documented. Over a much larger geographic scale,
eastern forests of North America witnessed the catastrophic
decline of the chestnut (Castanea dentata) during the first half
of this century. For this once dominant tree species, many
components of the near extinction are understood (cf. Braun
1950). In this example, most ecological considerations focused on
community level observations related to species replacement
(reviewed in Woods and Shanks 1959). At the individual level,
only general remarks were usually reported (cf. Nelson 1930).
Repeated measures on individuals may be necessary to effectively
explore population responses and to document patterns of
continued decline or recovery (Travis and Sutter 1986).
STUDY AREA AND METHODS
The range of T, taxifolia encompasses several private and
public preserves and parks (Figure 2.1). This study focuses
primarily on trees within secured habitat, although one site with
more than 40 individuals is included from outside preserve
boundaries. Each area was systematically searched by multiple
workers to insure that all trees within the sample region are
included in the census.
In 1988, a thorough survey of the ravine systems within the
southern portion of the Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve
(ABRP, Figure 2.1) was conducted. Seventy-nine trees were added
to the 25 previously known from this preserve. A repeat census in
1991 relocated 100 of these trees and added six new individuals
25
Figure 2.1. The distribution of TorreyA taxifolia. Highlightedareas show populations included in census or discussed in text.
ABRPBGSWTRSPFLCRLKSM
Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve (TNC)Big Sweetwater Preserve (TNC)Torreya State ParkFlat Creek (Private Land)Lake Seminole (U.S. Corps of Engineers)
from a portion of the preserve that had not been previously
censused (Table 2.1). Four trees censused in 1988, but not in
1991 are very difficult to find within a remote area of the
preserve and were excluded from the permanent census population.
In addition, 25 trees from U.S. Army Corps of Engineers land
at Lake Seminole (LKSM) were surveyed and tagged in 1988. This
was the entire population as reported elsewhere (Savage 1983, T.
Patrick,pers. comm.). By 1992, we had added two previously
overlooked individuals to this population (Table 2.1). One of
these new trees had previously been considered a second stem of a
known individual, the other was a newly encountered stem. In mid-
summer 1991, 25 trees from a population along Flat Creek (FLCR)
were also measured. This census population was increased to 31
trees in 1992.
Finally, census information was collected from 27 trees in
three separate ravines along the Big Sweetwater Creek (BGSW,
Figure 2.1) in 1991. One year of growth information is available
for the 16 trees from the BGSW population that were surveyed
prior to bud break in 1991. This census population was expanded
to 43 trees in 1992. The census population represents all trees
encountered along particular stretches of ravine systems within
the preserve. The total population on the BGSW preserve has been
measured to exceed 125 trees by Nature Conservancy volunteers.
A large population from Torreya State Park was excluded from
our study. Trees grown from seed were planted in the park during
the 1960s and 1970s in an attempt to increase the population of
27
Table 2.1. Number of Torreya taxifolia in the census populationduring each year of the study along with the number ofindividuals for which growth history is recorded over thisinterval.
POPULATIONA) Census ABRP 1 BGSW FLCR LKSM TOTAL1988 104 0 0 25 12919912 106 273 253 24 1821992 102 43 31 27 203B) GrowthGrowth in '89,90 98 0 0 23 121Growth in '91 106 16 0 24 146Growth '89-91 894 0 0 23 1115
1 - See text for explanation of site abbreviations.2 - Increase in numbers between years represent
expansions of census areas, not increases in populationsize within census populations.
3 - Most 1991 census data was collected after new growth anddoes not include growth information for 1991.
4 - Attrition in numbers is as a result of mortality.5 - Owing to 1988 census techniques we could not distinguish
between stems that grew and stems that did not grow for 20census trees between 1988 and 1991.
28
T. taxifolia. These plantings were not documented and can no
longer be discerned with certainty from natural stock.
Tree size was characterized by the number and length of
stems, the number of internodes along the main trunk of the
longest stem, and the number of branches along the main trunk for
the longest stem. Habitat was charactiized-by three measures.
Relative elevation above the ravine base was estimated using
slope and distance measurements. Canopy density above T.
taxifolia individuals were compared to the forest as a whole,
using a LICOR light sensor. Four readings were measured above
each tree. Ambient light levels were sampled haphazardly while
traversing between census trees at approximately 10 m intervals.
Aspect of the slope upon which trees were located was recorded by
compass.
Plant vigor was assessed through measures of recent growth
and presence of disease symptoms. New growth during the census
period was recorded as additional internode lengths on primary
stems. The length of new growth during the past three episodes of
terminal bud extension was also measured. Further, the age of
branches was estimated from the number of branch internodes. This
measure was compared to the number of stem internodes above the
branch point to estimate the frequency of terminal bud extension
for each tree under the assumption that lateral branches expand
internodes annually (this assumption will be discussed further
below). Terminal bud extension frequency allows an age correction
factor to be calculated that incorporates the likely frequency of
29
terminal bud extension. The approximate age of the oldest stem on
individuals was estimated by counting the number of internodes
along the trunk and multiplying by a population-wide estimate of
the frequency of terminal bud elongation.
To assess disease status we noted whether plants exhibited
any of several characteristic disease symptoms. Needle spots are
defined as discrete round patches of dead tissue between 1 and 3
mm in diameter. Needle spots were previously considered the most
prominent symptom of foliar disease in the wild (Alfieri et al.
1967). Needle necrosis was defined as dead tissue in a discrete
band laterally across needles and toward the needle tip. Stem
cankers were defined as any scar along the stem that was not
obviously a result of abrasion. These cankers were most
frequently swelling from within the woody tissue in larger stems,
and cracking and swelling of the bark in smaller stems. Stem
scars included all scarring of bark that appeared to be from
abrasions such as deer antler r.ubs or treefalls. The presence or
absence of disease symptoms, physical abrasions, and scarring was
noted for each individual.
RESULTS
The population of Torreya taxifolia is characterized by a
majority of individuals less than 1 m tall (Figure 2.2). The
largest stem for 57% of censused trees was between 25 and 100 cm
long, and the mean stem length was 87.8 cm with 6% of individuals
having stems more than 2 m long (Figure 2.2). The mean length of
the longest stem was not randomly distributed across populations
30
Figure 2.2. The distribution of size classes of the longest stemfor individual TorreyA 4taxifolia. Data are from trees sampledfrom throughout the natural range.
U)00I-
0.0Ez
40
30
20
10
In 0 ) a in O n 0 In 0 n W0 In4 In , 0 O4 U, 0 No4 W). 0 N
,. 0 -N - ,- t 0 4 N 4 U) €0
Length of Longest Stem (cm)
Figure 2.3. The number of stems per individual TorreaA taxifolia.Data are from trees sampled from throughout the natural range.
80
U)00I.-
Sz
60
40
20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10+
Number of Stems
AJ% -
(Table 2.2) and was larger toward the north portion of the range.
This trend appears to be a result of more very small individuals
toward the southern range limit (Table 2.2). This pattern of
increasing size with latitude was repeated within ravine systems
of the southernmost population (ABRP). Most individuals are
multi-stemmed, although the most frequent number of stems per
individual was one (Figure 2.3). Length of longest stem was
positively correlated with stem number, although the relationship
was weak (r2=.19, p<.001). Thus, it is not surprising that
individuals in the more northerly populations have more stems
(Table 2.2).
Torreya taxifolia is most commonly found at low elevations
with respect to ravine slopes (less than 6 meters above the
ravine base), although they may range well upslope (Figure 2.4).
The ravine habitats of T. taxifolia span any where from 12 to 45m
in elevation above constant running streams at the base of each
ravine (Schwartz 1990). The substrate of lower slopes is
characterized by higher soil moisture and higher organic content
than that of upper slopes (Schwartz 1990, unpublished data).
Torreya taxifolia is also generally found under a relatively
closed canopy duringthe summer (Figure 2.5), although this
pattern is descriptive of the habitat in general and does not
imply habitat selectivity in T taxifolia. Measures of
photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) averaged 215 Mmol/m2/s
(~s.d.=284, n=257) adjacent to T_. taxifolia, compared to 254
Mmol/m2/s (s.d. 308, n=293) for random points in the forest
32
0
(U
U)
0
4.)(UH
0p4
.1
p
S
140
00
(U41
U' LALANO
4w1
1%0 %O O O*%* *
r% co t-0 IC
'0
41I
I 001 0C-4*
co N tkHI(q* 0 0 I
41 00 U) *% I
AI
V4A
* 1
to I
-44 Ix I(UI I
4.) I
4JI 1
0 WI
4404.
44U00I
431
0r4~
.~0
04)
~4J
E-~4
0'0.
4J
r-
c4z
:I
*1I
00
00
10011T
CO I CO C-
1I 0
* en >I U
4P IIV4%r~0 I 0 IA
I r .4rZ (1)~I 4.)4.)44P
HI 00
*I 4F4 0~~~~ I-r.4J
LO I $4( U'IC4H0 U)M
4I >I 9H04 4
I lQ0
cl
Figure 2.4. The distribution of Torreya taxifolia across relativeelevation above ravine base. Data are from trees sampledthroughout the natural range. Ravines vary in depth from 12 to45m in relative elevation.
301
0 20
1 10z
01 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1011 1213+
Relative Elevation (m)
Figure 2.5. The distribution of Torreya taxifolia by canopy coverclass. Data are from trees sampled throughout the natural range.Canopy openness was measured as the percent of 100 random pointsthat did not intercept canopy vegetation in overhead 28mm wide-angle photographs taken above individual trees.
80-
0 20.0
in 40- W wuwier
Canopy Openness
Figure 2.6. The distribution of Torreva taxifolia with respect toaspect. Data are from trees found along slopes sampled throughoutthe natural range.
401
S 30
0-
"S 20
| 10z
0
Aspect
during leaf flush in March. These values averaged 25 % of full
sun levels measured during this period (x=1043 gmol/m2/s,
s.d.=547, n=42). Incident levels of light is correlated with
slope position; lower slopes tend to receive lower incident light
levels because of increased shading from uplsope vegetation as
well as an increased angle to the horizon (Schwartz 1990).
Finally, T. taxifolia is distributed widely with respect to
aspect (Figure 2.6).
The distribution of the apparent age of primary stems, as
assessed by the number of internodes, ranges between 1 and 21
years, with a mean of 8.0 (Figure 2.7). True stem age is related
to apparent age by the frequency with which stems expand an
apical bud and grow new internodes along the main stem. We have
observed that stems do not expand apical buds each year. The
relationship between apparent lateral branch age (lateral
internodes) and the number of terminal internodes above that
branch point provide a correction factor for age. This age
correction factor (Figure 2.8) suggests that terminal buds are
expanded approximately every other year under the assumption that
side branches expand leader buds each year. This correction
factor suggests that the mean age of stems is 12.0 (s.d=6.3),
with maximum stem age at 31 years. However, over the three years
of growth encompassed in this study (1989-1991) only 47% of
surviving trees expanded any terminal buds (see below), while
approximately 20% of trees expanded a new terminal internode each
year. This low rate of terminal bud expansion during the census
35
iqgure 2.7. Apparent age distribution of the oldest stems ofindividual Torreva taxifolia found in the Apalachicola Bluffs andRavines Preserve. Apparent age is estimated from counting thenumber of terminal internodes along the main stem.
30
I-
0
z
20
10
Apparent Age
Figure 2.8. The distribution of the number of termanal internodesabove individual branch points plotted against the number ofinternodes along the branch eminating from that branch point.This scatterplot estimates the frequency of terminal budelongation under the assumption that lateral branch buds elongateevery year. Thus, the relationship described by the these pointsprovides a correction factor for determination of the approximateminimum age of individual stems.
I
I0
I
12
10
8-
6-
4.
2
u
*** U
Ue W II
* UI •Ir • .l
* 0
* Ya0.47 + 1.4
U
s5*X r 2 = 0.89
- I -
NUXMs or TRanzL IrTnoo1s
0 2 4 6 8 10U
interval indicates that our corrected stem age estimates are also
low. Thus while we cannot age specific stems, the census
population appears to consist of a mixture of trees whose primary
stem dates from the time of the decline along with trees whose
primary stem is a sprout from an earlier stem that has died since
the onset of the decline.
Several patterns of disease incidence are noteworthy. First,
needle spots are found on nearly all trees, but rarely found to
exceed 5% coverage of needles (Table 2.3). Second, needle
necrosis, which has not previously been reported in the
literature, is widespread at low levels throughout the population
(Table 2.3). Finally, stem cankers appear to increase in more
northerly populations. However, this pattern may simply reflect
the fact that cankers often do not manifest themselves in smaller
stems. Canker occurrence is associated with longer total stem
length (t-test, T=4.43, p<.001). Needle disease incidence also
varied considerably between populations (Table 2.4), but small
population sizes at several sites make it difficult to accurately
test the significance of this variability.
The data from this study record growth and mortality for 111
individuals in two populations (ABRP and LKSM) during three
growing seasons (Table 2.1). During this period 11 individuals
(9.9%.) from these two populations died. All mortality was among
individuals from ABRP and ranging from 17 cm to 101 cm tall
(x=46.9 cm, s.d.= 23.6, n~ll) with two or fewer stems. Of the 117
plants that survived the 1988-1991 census interval, 18 (15.3%)
37
Table 2.3. The percent incidence of disease symptoms and damage
in Torreva taxifolia. Stem cankers are lesions in the outer
cambium visible from the surface. Stem scars are any scar tissue
along stems caused either by deer or any other abrasion. Needle
spots are brown circular spots that are distinct and isolated
from other damage. Needle necrosis are dead ends of needles that
constitute more than one-third the needle area.
SYMPTOM POPULATION PopulationABRP BGSW FLCR LKSX mean
Stem cankers 26.1 46.5 64.5 52.0 40.3
Stem scars 27.2 58.1 6.4 4.0 27.7
Needle DamageSpots >0%
>1%>5%
81.935.17.4
79.132.614.0
90.325.8
0
10052.24.3
85.536.37.3
Necrosis >0% 57.4 44.2 37.5 24.0 45.4>1% 29.8 11.6 0 12.0 17.1>5% 9.6 4.7 0 0 5.7
N 94 43 31 25 193
Table 2.4. Number of trees, by size class, differing in
growth fate from 1989-1991. Values in parentheses indicatepercentage of size class total (row total).
Size class Grew Did not Stem Died Totalgrow died
1989, 19900 - 50 cm 10 (34%) 10 (34%) 7 (24%) 2 (7-%) 29
51 - 100 cm 16 (38%) 17 (40%) 7 (17%) 2 (5%) 42101- 150 cm 6 (38%) 7 (44%) 3 (19%) 0 (0%) 16
151- 200 cm 4 (36%) 7 (64%) 0 (0 %) 0 (0%) 11> 200 cm 1 (14%) 5 (71%) 1 (14%) 0 (0%) 7
N 37 (35%) 46 (44%) 18 (17%) 4 (4%) 105
19910 - 50 cm 8 (14%) 29 (50%) 17 (29%) 4 (7%) 58
51 -100 cm 13 (21%) 38 (62%) 8 (13%) 2 (3%) 61101- 150 cm 3 (15%). 16 (80%) 0 (8%) 1 (5%) 20151- 200 cm 7 (37%) 12 (63%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 19>200 cm 4 (44%) 5 (56%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 9
N 35 (21%) 100 (60%) 25 (15%) '7 (4%) 167
38
lost their primary stem and decreased in size (Table 2.4).
Likewise, of the 182 census trees that survived between 1991 and
1992, 25 (13.7%) lost their primary stem and decreased in size.
When trees lost their primary stem they decreased an average of
45.2 cm (s.d.= 52.6). In total, 32% of those trees followed over
the entire four-year census interval lost a primary stem during
this period.
Differences in stem lengths between 1988 and 1991, along
with number of internodes on the main trunk, were used to
determine which trees expanded terminal buds during the census
interval. Because the 1991 census was completed prior to bud
break in 1991, the 1988-1991 census interval comprised only two
years of growth. For several plants it was unclear whether a
terminal bud had expanded. It-was difficult to accurately measure
the tops of the taller trees, and many of these questionable
plants are among the larger stems. Between 1991 and 1992 growth
fate was more accurately determined through a comparison of
recent terminal internode lengths to determine if a new internode
was added. The most frequent fate of trees over both census
intervals was no new growth (Table 2.4). Approximately 35% of
trees grew between 1988 and 1990, while 21% of individuals grew
in 1991. Over the census interval not one single tree expanded
terminal buds in all three years, fewer than 20% grew in two of
three years, and only 47% expanded a terminal internode at some
time during the period. The only pattern between size and growth
history is that the majority of stem and individual mortality was
39
among small individuals (Table 2.4). Average length of new
growth among those trees that expanded a terminal bud was 9.60 cm
(s.d.= 5.2). In addition, there was a weak, but significant,
positive linear relationship between the length of the primary
stem and the amount of new growth during both census intervals
(r2 < 0.30, p S .02). Among the 13 trees that lost their primary
stem between 1988 and 1991 and expanded terminal buds on
secondary stems average two-year growth was 13.6 cm (s.d.= 8.7
cm) on the new, shorter primary stems. Combining growth and
mortality results for those trees followed for four years we find
that the mean length of the primary stem decreased by 2.5 cm over
the census interval. This decrease in mean size is accounted for
by height loss associated with stem death, coupled with sparse
gains in height through growth and a slight positive effect in
mean size through differential mortality among small individuals.
Trees that grew in 1991 had fewer stems (x=--2.4, s.d.=l.l,
n=36) than those that did not grow (x=2.7, s.d.=2.0, n=99) or
whose primary stem died (x=3.0, s.d.=2.3, n=25). This pattern was
repeated from the 1989, 1990 growth data. Trees that grew in 1991
also more frequently exhibited stem cankers, although this
pattern is probably a result of the fact that cankers are more
frequently found on larger stems, and that larger stems more
frequently grew in 1991 (Table 2.4). Trees whose stems died
during 1991 routinely exhibited a higher incidence of moderate
levels (>1%, >5%) of needle spots and needle necrosis (Table
2.5). Finally, trees that grew and were free from needle necrosis
40
grew more (x=9.8 cm, s.d.=6.0, n=17) than those that exhibited
needle necrosis (x=6.5 cm, s.d.=3.2, n=19)(T-test, T=2.02,
df=23.6,p=.05), although this pattern did not hold for needle
spots.
G-tests of growth category (Grew, Did not, Stem Died, and
Died) by habitat categories (relative elevation, canopy cover,
and aspect) revealed no significant patterns. Similarly, the
occurrence of stem cankers, needle spots and needle necrosis were
unrelated to habitat variables. Finally, growth fate of trees
prior to 1991 was not related to growth fate during 1991 (G-test
of independence, G=1.78, df=7, p>.5).
DISCUSSION
This work suggests a refinement in the estimate of the
number of extant T. taxifolia. This survey, along with additional
census information collected by Nature Conservancy volunteers on
their preserves account for 240 trees. An unpublished report from
Torreya State Park includes over 200 trees (Bryan, personal
communication). Several smaller populations not included in this
survey account for nearly 100 additional trees. Thus, we can
directly account for over 500 trees. This number exceeds one
estimate of the remaining population (Stalter and Dial 1984).
Most known populations of T. taxifolia are within 2 km of the
Apalachicola River. This study, the Torreya State Park survey,
and Baker and Leonard (1982) censused most ravine habitats within
2 km of the river in the southern half of the range of T.
taxifolia. The northern populations in this study (LKSM, FLCR)
41
Table 2.5. The percentage of trees, classified by growth fate in1991 exhibiting various symptoms disease. Needle spots and needlenecrosis are categorized by the portion of the total greenfoliage affected by the symptom.
Growth fate Disease symptom1991 Stem Stem Needle Needle
canker scar spots necrosis>0% >1% >5% >0% >1% >5%
Grew 44.4 25.0 94.4 30.6 5.6 52.8 19.4 0.0Did not grow 35.4 27.3 76.8 33.3 3.0 39.4 13.1 3.0Stem Died 20.0 24.0 92.0 60.0 24.0 68.0 48.0 28.0
Population 35.0 26.3 83.1 36.9 6.9 46.9 20.0 6.3
42
are included because they contain the only large populations of
trees known from this portion of the range. Based on our
assessment of the thoroughness of recent surveys, along with
anecdotal accounts of populations throughout the range (Baker
pers. comm., Gholson pers. comm.) we estimate that the extant
population is probably between 800 and 1500 individuals, and
almost certainly does not exceed 2000 individuals.
The pattern of larger mean size of individuals toward the
northern range limit may be a result of differences in habitat.
The Cody escarpment, delineating the Pleistocene sandy soils in
the south from the clayey Miocene soils in the north, divides the
range in the Big Sweetwater Preserve. Soil differences across
this escarpment may result in differential abilities of T.
1axifolia to survive and grow. Alternatively, this nonrandom
assortment of stem sizes may be a result of differences in the
geographical distribution of foliar disease, as suggested by
Table 5. One aspect of the demographic pattern of the T
taxifolia population that is not depicted well by these data is
that the trees are less abundant within the appropriate habitat
in the northern portion of the range. This is reflected somewhat
by sample sizes within populations.
The trunks of dead T. taxifolia remain well preserved on the
forest floor. The distribution of these trunks, as well as
anecdotal accounts, suggests a formerly more widespread
distribution with respect to slope position than was observed in
this study. Further, previous accounts of the species suggest an
43
historical distribution that included more trees further up
ravines away from the Apalachicola River (Figure 2.1). Few of
these trees remain. Thus, the decline seems to have been
accompanied by a narrowing of the environmental conditions across
which T. taxifolia may be found.
Also of note with respect to dead trunks on the forest floor
are our personal observations that these trunks were never
associated with live T. taxifolia. Thus, the current population
does not appear to consist of survivors from the decline but
probably grew from seeds germinated during or after the onset of
the decline. This observation is contrary to other reports
implying that the current population consists of stump sprouts
from formerly large individuals (Toops 1981, Savage 1983, USFWS
1986). It is not known how long seeds may lie dormant in the
soil, but a large nut is characteristic of seeds that do not
remain dormant for a long period of time.
Incidence of disease symptoms also varies geographically
across the range. High levels of foliar disease symptoms (needle
spots and necrosis) appear to be more frequent on trees in the
southern half of the range, while cankers are more common on
trees in the northern portion of the range. However,
interpopulation patterns of disease incidence is confounded by
other measures of plant vigor. For instance, stem cankcers are
more readily discernible on larger stems. Therefore, we expect a
higher incidence in populations of larger trees. However, these
results provide evidence that stem cankers are•not associated
44
with decreased plant vigor, as measured through frequency and
amount of new growth on cankered versus uncankered stems, while
symptoms of foliar pathogens are associated with higher rates of
stem death and less growth in the case of needle necrosis.
However, needle spotting does not currently appear as chronic as
suggested previously (Alfieri et al 1967, 1984, USFWS 1986).
The growth data demonstrate that the remaining population is
continuing to decline with 10% mortality, 32% stem mortality and
mean size of trees decreasing by 2.5 cm during the four year
census interval. The mean age of the oldest stems of individuals
is approximately half of what we would expect if the population
represented new, healthy recruitment following the decline in the
1950s. Thus, most individuals have lost their primary stem at
least once since, the decline 30 years ago. Further, the age
estimates for the census population approximate a normal
distribution, rather than being clustered at any single age,
suggesting that continued mortality among primary stems is
inhibiting maturation of the population. However, some of the
larger trees (>2 m) appear to represent first-generation recovery
from the time of the decline.
These census data allow an assessment of the pattern of
decline in T. taxifolia. Individuals that died during this census
period were smaller than average. The average length of a primary
stem that died on a surviving individual was slightly longer than
the average length of all primary stems, leaving a new primary
stem that was shorter than the mean for the population. Although
45
few individual cases of stem mortality can be attributed to any
single factor such as stem girdling, we can speculate that the
the mortality figures results highlight two modes of stem
mortality. First, small, suppressed, and presumably stressed,
plants eventually die when reserves are depleted and they cannot
maintain sufficient physiological activity. Second, older and
longer stems appear to eventually succumb to progressive disease
or fall prey to girdling by abrasions such as deer antler rubs,
leaving smaller stems behind. The fact that trees that grew had
fewer stems than those that did not implies that resprouting
behavior may also be a sign. of stress.
The true measure of whether T. taxifolia is exhibiting
greater than expected levels of mortality lies in a comparison
with other woody species with which it is associated. Stem
mortality was just over 10% for all trees greater than 2 cm in
diameter at breast height during a three-year census of trees in
a mapped plot in the same region (Schwartz 1990). Although these
data are not directly comparable, individual mortality (10%) and
stem mortality (32%) among T. taxifolia appears higher than
expected. This high mortality rate combined with the lack of net
growth insures that the population will continue to shrink both
in numbers and mean size.
There is hope of a recovery, however, from a small subset of
trees (<10) that seem to exhibit few Symptoms of disease and
appear to be approaching maturation. At present, there are four
sexually mature males and no sexually mature females known in the
46
wild. Two trees are large enough that we would predict them to be
sexually mature if they were male,, indicating that these may be
females. Without direct intervention to facilitate growth and
survival, T. taxifolia appears destined to continue its slow
decline toward extinction in the wild. The problem remains as to
what caused the decline and whether the vector still persists in
the current population, if any management intervention can
increase growth and vigor among the remaining individuals, and
whether those few individuals that appear to be doing well are so
because they are resistant or because they are lucky.
47
CHAPTER THREE
Genetic Variability in Torreya taxifolia
As a result of potential imminent extinction, the stinking
cedar was chosen a target species for ex situ conservation by the
Center for Plant Conservation and the Arnold Arboretum. Isozyme
analysis was used to characterize the genetic structure of T.
taxifolia in order to develop a plan for collecting and managing
material for a permanent collection to be housed in botanical
gardens.
Studies of the genetic variation associated with rare
species are important for developing our understanding of the
genetic structure of rare species (e.g., Falk and Holsinger
1990), as well as developing general expectations of levels of
genetic variation in species that differ life history
characteristics (e.g., Hamrick and Godt 1989). Assessing genetic
variability in T. taxifolia will assist in conservation efforts
to save this particular species in several ways. First, measuring
the amount and spatial distribution of inter- versus intra-
population variability will help determine a management strategy
for ex situ conservation. Second, this genetic characterization
of T. taxifolia can potentially identify isozyme markers
associated with disease susceptibility or resistance. Finally,
this study will help to determine whether the on-going decline
has caused a detectable genetic bottleneck.
48
METHODS
Needle tissue was gathered from 189 trees in 17 populations
distributed among six major drainage regions across the range of
T. taxifolia (Figure 3.1). In each population we sampled all
individuals encountered up to a maximum of 31 individuals. Table
1 provides sample sizes from each population. Most (150) trees
sampled for genetic analysis also had cuttings removed for
captive propagation. All sampled trees were individually tagged
for future reference.
The measure of genetic variability used for this study was
starch gel electrophoresis following the techniques of Conkle et
al. (1982). Starch gel electrophoresis allows detection of
allelic variation from needle tissue (Conkle et al 1982). Foliar
samples were processed and analyzed in the USFS Tree Genetics
Laboratory in Berkeley, California in collaboration with Dr. C.
Millar. Twenty loci among 16 enzyme systems were identified
(Table 3.1).
For each drainage region, I present the sample size, mean
number of alleles per locus, Nei's (1978) unbiased estimate of
expected heterozygosity (He), and the ratio of observed
heterozygosity (Ho) to He . Between drainage, and between
population, genetic distances are reported using Nei's unbiased
genetic distance (Nei 1978). The total genetic diversity (Hi) at
each locus was partitioned into four hierarchical components (Nei
1977): variation within populations (Hp), variation among
populations within drainages (Dxd), variation among drainages
49
Figure 3.1. The range of Torreya taxifolia depicting drainageregions in which trees were sampled for genetic analysis. Thesesampling units are: A) Lake Ocheesee, B) U.S. Corps of Engineers,Woodruff Dam, C) Flat Creek, D) Torreya State Park, E) BigSweetwater Creek, F) Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve.
within regions (Ddr), and variation among regions (Dr). Regions
described in this hierarchical anlysis are: 1) drainages north of
the Cody escarpment, where relatively clayey soils dominate
(Figure 3.1, Lake Seminole, Flat Creek, Torreya State Park and
Big Sweetwater drainages); 2) drainages south of the Cody
escarpment, with relatively sandy soils (Apalachicola Bluffs
Preserve); and 3) trees from the outlying population not within
any ravine drainage (Lake Ocheesee).
The genetic relationship between populations was further
examined using a cluster analysis of Nei's unbiased genetic
distance. Cluster analysis used the unweighted pair-group method
with arithmetic averaging (UPGMA, Sneath and Sokal 1973) on the
17 populations sampled. All calculations were completed using
BIOSYS-1 ver. 1.6 (Swofford and Selander 1989).
RESULTS
Of the 20 loci sampled, only seven exhibited allelic
variation in the trees sampled, three of which contained
variation at a single tree or in a single population (Table 3.1).
Further, each variable locus contained just two alleles (Table
3.1). This low level of variability resulted in few polymorphic
loci and low heterozygosity (Table 3.2). The mean genetic
distance between populations within drainages (x=0.012,
range=0.000 to 0.044, n=29) is equal to the mean genetic distance
between drainages (x=0.012, range= 0.001 to 0.028, n=15) and
slightly, but not significantly, lower than the mean of genetic
distance between all populations (x=0.016, range=0.000 to 0.062,
51
4)
F-I
0
0
hIt00'4J
0
$4-0
%4~
0
0
4)
0
0
r-4
E4)
%0 1
%0I
Lnm I
E--4eSJ0 )0
00Lin LO
LALA~w
0 0
CC4e
00t~00
00a
I00H~ Ln LA
(0
0 0LOLO
%00
z~00
.0
rqc
00c00
* 0
0 0
0 0
co ICO04~
00
0% C% H
0 0
V-4
ei4Z
e.)'3CV)
00
(~00
LO N -4
00C.'
00
-I .
004000 L
00
00
LAOLH
00L q
00r%.0 0
00V-4I0
00e0 0
.0
00C~00
V-4 ON 0
00'00
r-400.
0000 00
0000
0000
H 00
00LOJ C IV
HONN\ co H
0 0~000v 00
00
00
0 0
0 0u-00
HO 0
00
C~00.00
Ho
00%0)00
.0VH4o
00000
00c.00
Hno
00~J00
H.
00
'000.0
Ho
00
000.H0 0
0 0
00
H.000400
0 0T-4c~
00
.0Ho0
00.00
00C~00
00H00
00C.00
H00
00
q~00
H.0
00-40 00
00
coH
0 0
000
0 0
I-I
m~oo I
00
00 1
(%00I1
001
001
001co0 001
to
LA
'0
04
04z
'0
0r1-4
r4-
0.-
0#
4IJ.9.4to
*
0*4
000
0
4J
t9o
'4
0
4.).
4)94-
*Q0.O-0
U
N
*-4eQ
E4
I I II I II I II I O CO III 0O co 4 I
>94 co 0 1-4mI4J 1I %0 CM r-I4 iw 0 COwI *4 1 f4 Co * * * IlU)0 I * * *IIOE lwI I
IO I I1 t 1 IIN I I10 I I
I M I I1 0 I - ~ I4-) owI %* %- O 0 -- -- %1 0 4 I N 1 oLA mHM> 4I
I 1 0000n00n0000 I1 I 0oo00 ooo001o 0
0 II I II I II I II U I II *d I IIU*4 ,C I II 04 I I
0O II
I 0O II
I z* 4) 1 00I IIOH I II o I 4I I I
I Z 4) II *0U)I II 0"s6 I I
I r0I w- w I ' w
I u-u4I * * * * * * * * I
4. 01 4 ) 4 4)I
I O 9rI I
I OI WH H M M M MI
4) 4 4)I 0 0 I ** * * * *** *** *m* *** I
I OU) I :III I
I I II I II 10 00 0 N II 10 -I 4) . IIIH IU 00 0 IP 10 9 .)I IP 10* 0 04I ~II I.0 0 0 4.) 0me I
I 4 4H 10 **M 0 1**1 U)** 0 * II 10a U) UI.
0E I > U) U I
10 0 4. 0 0 I
I0 I0b O 0 .4 0 - I
I 1, 0 *M 0 4I0 I LA r4 'Q Me LA''II 1- I > ,
n=136) (Table 3.3). The mean genetic distance between the
outlying Lake Ocheesee population and all other populations is
relatively high (x=0.018, range= 0.000 to 0.050) (Table 3.3).
However, this estimate of genetic distance is weak because sample
size is small. Only five trees remain in this outlying
population.
Using a hierarchical analysis to partition the total genetic
variation sampled (H.) into variation found at the population,
drainage, and regional levels demonstrates that most (79%)
genetic diversity is at the population level (Hp). Of the
remaining variation, relatively more was partitioned among
populations within drainages (Dpd, 10%) than either between
drainages (Ddr, 6.5%) or between regions (Dr, 4.5%) (Table 3.4).
Supporting the prevoius results, the cluster analysis of Nei's
genetic distance did not discern evidence of structured dif-
ferentiation among populations, drainages, or regions (Figure
3.2).
DISCUSSION
Plants with similar life-history characteristics often have
characteristic levels and distributions of genetic variability
(Hamrick and Godt 1989). Our observation of low genetic diversity
in T. taxifolia, along with this diversity being distributed
within, rather than between, populations fits the general pattern
of the distribution of genetic diversity in obligately
outcrossing, wind-pollinated coniferous trees (Hamrick and Godt
1989). However, genetic variation among conifers with extremely
55
4) 1 P HI 0
II D 'K00 0 000 100 4) 1 f-4 0000 > I II
U4J 0 1 1 IN (4 0%0 001wIrzvo I 001000104'00N01
004to I v-4 IM*1 * 00 0 0 * 1
04 INIV'K 0H0e IHO Irzr'I 'K00001
31 O0N Ia ION I
4-)I '0000 00 1
000 10 0I 0 I
4J I I * ' V- vM0 %DN 0'a14.10 I,-4I000000001
w cI 1-000000000.1I -) 11I
0 v I I 0OW0000WON I
4J I0 N Vc4 0 N00 V-4 0 0 N IOH 4) 1O H 0
000 If-1000 0000 'IG0'L0 0 f4I1
4.)$.M I 1 .0.000' 0 H41 0 00 0 I
fl'O i za LI1 0 00 00000000 1
(0 1 I I ( 'K 000 000 'D~-~0 0 0 I
*0 I I'ONu- O OC
tv I u0I 000 I
~ I I K000~ 00OakI a ') ' 00 - 0 00 0 H
Table 3.4. Estimates of the partitioning of the total genediversity (Ht) for seven polymorphic loci. See text forexplanation of levels of genetic variation.
Locus H D Ddr DrPGI-2 .488 .3 8 .*09 -.011 .061AAT .496 .387 .043 .064 .002SIX .326 .280 .010 .032 .004UGP .046 .043 .005 -.001 -.001IDH .019 .016 .000 .005 -.002MDH-2 .013 .013 .003 -.002 .000PGI-1 .002 .002 .000 .000 .000
Mean .199 .157 .020 .013 .009Percent 78.9 10.1 6.5 4.5
57
Figure 3.2. Cluster Analysis of 17 Torreya taxifolia populationsusing Nei's (1978) unbiased genetic distance.
.05 .04 .03 .02 .01 .00 DrainagePopulation RegionTorreya St Park A D
:Torreya St Park B D
'Big Sweetwater A B
--- Beaverdam Creek F
--- - Ocheesee AI I
SIAspalaga Creek D
--- Big Sweetwater D B
I II II 'No Name Creek A F
Lake Seminole B
- No Name Creek C F
----- ---'No Name Creek B FII
- Kelly Creek F
- Big Sweetwater E E
-- Big Sweetwater B E
--- Big Sweetwater C E
Flat Creek B C
IFlat Creek A C
.05 .04 .03 .02 .01 .00
Farris (1972) "F" = 127.4Percent Standard Deviation = 98.7Cophenetic correlation = -0.521
58
limited distributions, such as torrey pine and, can be variable.
For instance, torrey pine has very low variability (Ledig and
Conkle 1983), while monterey pine has high levels of isozyme
variability (Millar et al. 1988, Moran et al. 1988). Both species
have severly limited distributions and small populations.
This characterization of the genetic diversity in T
taxifolia is consistent with a pattern for a species of tree that
has been subjected to population bottlenecks (Critchfield 1984).
A genetic bottleneck hypothesis is supported by the fact that T.
californica, the only other North American congener, has
relatively high levels of genetic variability (Schwartz and
Millar, unpublished data). The observation that there is little
differentiation between populations suggests that this
hypothesized genetic bottleneck occurred prior to the current
decline. If the depauperate nature of T. taxifolia were a result
of the current decline, we would expect to see few common alleles
and many rare alleles scattered among the individuals sampled,
which is not the case. The observed pattern of genetic variation,
under a hypothesis of a current genetic bottleneck, is only
likely if the inferred isozyme alleles lost as a result of this
decline were tightly linked to characters that were strongly
selected against during the current decline, a scenario which
seems improbable.
The hypothesis of a past genetic bottleneck is supported by
two additional pieces of evidence. First, Taxus floridana, a
small coniferous tree restricted to nearly an identical range as
59
T. taxifolia, also has uncharacteristically low levels of genetic
variability (Schwartz and Millar, unpublished data). Second,
isozyme analysis of a few individuals that have been growing
outside the range of T. taxifolia since before the decline do not
show higher levels of genetic diversity than trees in the wild
(Schwartz, unpublished data). Thus, T. taxifolia probably
experienced at least one other population bottleneck prior to the
current population decline that resulted in a reduction of
genetic variability in the species. This is not to say, however,
that the current decline has not resulted in significant loss of
genetic variation. Given the magnitude of the current decline, it
quite likely has suffered additional loss in genetic variation.
Finally, with the low levels of genetic variation observed
in T. taxifolia, it is improbable that a supposedly neutral
marker, such as an isozyme allele, could be identified that would
identify particularly resistant, or susceptible trees. Indeed,
none of the three rare alleles .sampled in this study were found
in either of the two trees sampled that appear to be healthy and
maturing in the wild. Given that we have not been able to
identify which, if any, of the disease symptoms currently
exhibited in the wild are associated with the primary pathogens
of the decline (Schwartz 1990), testing for the co-occurrence of
alleles and disease symptoms is premature.
Management Recommendations
The adopted strategy for ex situ conservation of T.
taxifolia has been to place one cutting from each of the 150
60
trees sampled at each of four botanical gardens (R. Nicholson.
Personal Communication). These cuttings will then be reared to
maturity. This strategy was adopted to minimize the risk of loss
of any individual genotype. Given the low inter-population
variability of T. taxifolia, it appears unlikely that the
crossing of individuals from different populations will create
outbreeding depression problems, or disrupt locally adapted gene
complexes. Thus, this management course should be maintained.
Further, a few mature trees from four known locations
outside the natural range are currently producing seed. Inclusion
of seed from these botanic garden and yard trees could accelerate
the process of developing a permanent ex situ collection, as well
as assist in developing a population for eventual re-stocking of
native habitat. From the results presented here, it appears
unlikely that inclusion of this genetic stock of unknown origin
would significantly disrupt the ex situ conservation population.
Cultivation from available seed is recommended following genetic
screening of these reproductively active trees.
61
CHAPTER 4
The Light Relations of Torreya taxifolia with Special
Emphasis on the Relationship to Growth and Disease
Light is often a limiting resource for plant growth (e.g.,
Tilman 1988). Low light conditions can create plant stress,
potentially enhancing the ability of pathogens to successfully
attack plants (Manion 1981). One hypothesis that may explain the
lack of recovery in T. taxifolia is that growth may be limited by
chronically low light levels (see Chapter 1). This hypothesis
relies on two conditions. First, that there was a decrease in
light level penetrating to lower ravine slopes associated with
fire suppression in the surrounding uplands and upper ravine
slopes (see Chapter 1). Second, the distribution of the species
has been compressed to lower slope (and hence lower light)
positions; a condition witnessed by the locations of dead stems
on the forest floor as well as current mortality patterns (see
Chapter 2).
Thus, low light may be associated with decreased
survivorship, reduced growth, and increased disease symptoms.
These phenomena relate to the hypothesis that increased shading
through increased densities of hardwoods on upper slopes, as a
result of fire suppression, could have contributed to decreased
vigor and the decline of T. taxifolia (see Chapter 1).
62
In addition, the foliar pathogens causing needle spots and
needle necrosis (see Chapter 2) may inhibit T. *taxifolia's
ability to thrive in the low light conditions in which it
currently grows. More specifically, foliar pathogens may inhibit
maximum photosynthetic rates in T. taxifolia. The relationship
between foliar pathogens and plant vigor is particularly
important in T. taxifolia because a causative agent of the
catastrophic decline has not been ascertained. One hypothesis is
that foliar pathogens were responsible for this decline, and are
responsible for the current lack of recovery in the species (see
Chapter 1). We can begin to test this hypothesis by examining the
effect of foliar pathogens on rates of photosynthetic activity.
Alternatively, several phenomena associated with plant
health can be addressed by studying the light relations of T.
taxifolia. Hypothesized environmental stress, such as increased
ravine temperatures, decreased humidity, and drought, may have
increased plant stress in T. taxifolia, and enhanced disease. An
obvious symptom of this purported plant stress would be a
decreased ability to photosynthesize under stressful conditions.
METHODS
We use two general procedures to'assess the light relations
of T. taxifolia. First, we assess the effect of light levels on
tree growth th through field surveys and experimental manipulation
of the light environment of trees. Second, a portable gas
exchange system (LICOR-6200) was used to measure photosynthesis
in T. taxifolia under varying environmental conditions. For these
63
assessments of physiological response to environment stress we
assume that photosynthetic rate is a measure of plant vigor and
that decreased photosynthetic rates indicate plant stress.
Light and Growth
To assess the relationship between light level and growth a
correlation between recent growth and canopy cover was used. This
data was coupled with an experimental test of whole plant growth
in canopy openings versus growth under closed canopies. Twelve
trees were selected for use in an analysis of recent growth and
light levels. All trees were between 95 cm and 328 cm in height.
Recent growth was measured through three variables: 1) mean
length of the three most recent terminal internodes along the
main stem, 2) maximum terminal internode length of these three
most recent terminal extensions, and 3) the proportion of lateral
branch tips extending new growth in the current year.
These growth values were compared to an estimate of canopy
closure for each tree. Canopy closure was measured using the
frequency of point light intercepts assessed through overhead
photography. Four photos were used to characterize the canopy
over each individual tree: one directly overhead, and three at
450 angles facing due south, east, and west. The northern aspect
was excluded as it is less important in determining the amount of
daily direct sunlight a plant receives. Slides of the canopy were
projected onto a screen containing 100 randomly located points.
The same 100 points were used for all slides. For each slide, the
proportion of points where sky was obstructed by vegetation was
64
recorded. A mean of the four slides was used as a measure of
percent canopy closure. Canopy closure was correlated to each of
the growth measures through linear regression.
The experimental test of the effect of light levels on
growth was begun in the spring of 1991. Twelve trees were chosen
to have canopy gaps opened above them. All trees were located on
the Apalachicola Bluffs and Ravines Preserve (Figure 2.1).
Terminal bud expansion, and the length of the most recent needle
bearing branch internodes along the main stem were measured as
response variables. These response measures were compared to
measures of plant growth produced prior to the canopy opening.
To assess the relationship the presence of disease symptoms
and light level we used a contingency table test (G-test, Sokal
and Rohlf 1981) between visual estimates of percent canopy cover
class and the presence of disease symptoms. Finally, we use a G-
test (Sokal and Rohlf 1981) to examine the potential relationship
between growth fate over the three year census interval (see
Chapter 2) and the various canopy cover classes. This test
provides an additional estimate of the relationship between light
level and growth.
Measurements of Photosynthetic Rates
A series of field tests are described below that attempt to
ascertain the relationship between growth, plant vigor and light
in T. taxifolia. Field measurements of photosynthetic rates were
used to address the hypothesis that the decline in T. taxifolia
was a result of foliar pathogens (Chapter 1). In addition, a
65
series of lab experiments were conducted measuring photosynthetic
capacity of T. taxifolia and closely allied species to test
hypotheses relating environmental change to plant stress that may
have facilitated the decline (Chapter 1). All of these
experiments use the LICOR 6200 closed system infra-red portable
gas analyzer. The LICOR 6200 gas analyzer is a closed-system
device that allows non-destructive sampling of photosynthetic
rates by enclosing branchlets of needles into an airtight one
liter chamber. The LICOR 6200 measures the rate of CO2 drawdown,
along with numerous other parameters (e.g., temperature, light
level, and humidity). Instantaneous rates of photosynthesis and
conductance are then calculated by standard gas-exchange
equations. Photosynthesis, naturally, is dependent on
concentrations of CO2 . All experiments were conducted under CO2
concentrations between 350 and 400 ppm (ambient atmospheric
conditions).
We began by establishing a baseline photosynthetic light
response curve for T. taxifolia. This field test was conducted
using first year needles from 15 plants under natural and
enhanced light conditions. Light levels were varied from a
maximum of 12.2 to 1821 /mols/m2/sec Photosynthetically Active
Radiation (PAR). When possible, natural light was used with shade
cloth applied to reduce incident light. In many cases, however,
natural light was insufficient. In these cases light was enhanced
using a 12v tungsten halogen 100 watt projector lamp with
reflector (Sylvania EFP). No difference in maximum rates of
66
photosynthesis were observed when plants were illuminated with
natural versus artificial light sources.
To determine if the presence of symptoms of foliar pathogens
are related to carbon gain, maximum net photosynthetic and
respiration rates of healthy needles were compared to those
bearing needle spots. The difference between the rates of
photosynthesis and respiration is a measure of relative carbon
gain potential (Fritter and Hay 1981). These measures of
differences in rates of photosynthesis between healthy and
diseased needles were conducted in the field during the summer of
1991. Measurements were collected between 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM,
using either direct solar irradiation, or when necessary, the
lamp described above. In all cases, measurements were recorded
only when light levels exceeded the light saturation point for T.
taxifolia (350 Mmol/m2/sec PAR).
A comparative study of the photosynthetic response rates
across environmental variables for five species within the family
Taxaceae was conducted in order to assess whether T. taxifolia is
particularly sensitive to certain types of environmental stress
(see Chapter 1). We compared species responses to light level,
temperature, humidity, and water stress for the following
species: T. taxifolia, T. californica, T, grandis, T. nucifera,
and Taxus floridana. The four species in thegenus Torreya were
chosen to provide a broad sample of how closely related species
respond to environmental conditions. Taxus floridana was chosen
because it is related at the family level and is completely
67
overlapping in distribution and habitat with Torreya taxifolia.
These tests were performed in the greenhouse and in
controlled environment chambers. Seedlings of T. californica and
Taxus floridana were 2- to 3-years old and had been grown outside
under full sun. The Torreya taxifolia, T. randis, and T.
nucifera were derived from cuttings and grown under greenhouse
conditions for 2 years. All plants were acclimated to greenhouse
conditions for at least one month prior to measurements. All
plants were fertilized weekly with 20-20-20 fertilizer and were
grown in 5 inch clay plots containing a peat:pearlite:sand (1:1:1
vol.) mixture.
In order to maintain similar environmental conditions, and
have control over temperature, measurements were conducted in a
Conviron growth chamber (Controlled Environments Inc., Pembina
ND, USA) with a 12 h photoperiod and day/night temperatures of
220C/180 C. The growth chamber was illuminated by banks of 195 W
Sylvania cool white fluorescent bulbs and 40 W General Electric
incandescent bulbs. Together these lights provided approximately
400 Mmol/m2/sec PAR at the top of the crown. To insure light
saturation during measurements, the 12v 100 W projector lamp
described above was used to supplement light within the growth
chamber. All measurements were conducted at PAR greater than 500
Mmol/m2/sec and between 350 and 400 ppm CO2.
Temperature response curves of net photosynthesis and dark
respiration were conducted at a constant vapor pressure to
eliminate the potential effects of varying moisture availability
68
on stomatal aperture (Fritschen and Gay 1979). Measurements of
light, and drought photosynthetic response curves were conducted
at 200C and 50% relative humidity. The drought study was
initiated by saturating pots with water and measuring
photosynthesis daily for 6 days. Water was withheld for the
duration of the study and the pots were individually weighed just
prior to photosynthetic measurements to determine water loss from
the pots. Photosynthetic response to humidity was determined by
maintaining the appropriate relative humidity (approximately 20%,
50% and 90%) within the leaf chamber at 200C.
RESULTS
Light and Growth
Field tests of light and growth had mixed results. Both
maximum and mean terminal extension length were positively
correlated with light level (Figure 4.1). In contrast, we found
no relationship between the proportion of lateral branch buds
that expanded and light (r=.16,p=.62). The observed relationships
between terminal extension and light are influenced by the
contribution of a single tree with very high light levels.
However, the significance of the light and growth relationships
remain after exclusion of this outlying observation.
One year growth measurements on the 12 trees for which light
levels were increased showed no observable increase in growth
response. The majority (9 of 12) either died or failed to expand
a terminal bud during this first year of the test. Thus, we
recorded no positive growth response of trees to increased light
69
Fiqur 4.1. Average length of terminal bud elongation in the past
three years of TorreyA taxifolia plotted against percent canopy
light transmission (see text for explanation of methods). A)
without Aspalaga tree (outlier), B) all observations
A Torreya16
14
Average 12Terminal
ShootElongation 10
8
6
y = 5.5845 + 0.25749x R^2 * 0.302U
B
0
10 20Percent Canopy Light Transmission
30
BTorreya
AverageTerminal
ShootElongation
10
16
14
12
10
8
610 20 30
Percent Canopy Light40-
Transmission50
iA 1 & % ^L iAd9b - a& a0% M A aA ^ A A^ AP^" -
levels treatments. Likewise, canopy cover class was not strongly
related to three-year survivorship, although slightly more trees
in high light classes died or suffered major stem death than
expected, fewer trees died or suffered major stem death in low
light classes than expected, and more trees grew in low light
classes than expected (Table 4.1). This result also runs counter
to our light limitation hypothesis. Finally, neither the
occurrence of needle spots, needle necrosis, or stem cankers
appear related to canopy cover class (Table 4.2).
Measurements of Photosynthetic Rates
A comparison of light curves reveals that the light
saturation point is at approximately 300 Mmol/m2/sec PAR for both
healthy and diseased needles (Figure 4.2). Healthy needles,
however, have an approximately 20 % higher maximum net
photosynthetic capability than diseased tissue (Figure 4.3). In
addition, the 20% reduction in photosynthetic output of diseased
needles exceeds the total surface area effected by the foliar
pathogens, indicating a disruption of internal leaf function,
rather than a simple reduction in photosynthetically active
tissue. Likewise, we measured the dark respiration rates of
healthy needles from eight trees versus diseased needles from
eight trees. Dark respiration rates were calculated using
multiple measurements (1-4) on each tree. Healthy needles have
lower respiration rates diseased needles (Figure 4.3).
Measurements of productivity by needle age demonstrates that
T. taxifolia retains as much as 90% of maximum net photosynthetic
71
Table 4.1 Variation in survival and growth compared to canopycover class. Chi-square test of association lumped adjacent coverclasses 1, and 2 with 3, 4 with 5, and 6 with 7. Individuals thatdied were lumped with individuals whose major stem died.Coalescing of groups was done to avoid sensitivity of theanalysis as a result of small expected values in accordance withSokal and Rohlf (1981).
Canopy cover classGrowth open closedFate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 tot
Died 0 1 1 0 2 0 0 4Major Stem Death 0 2 7 5 6 0 0 20Did Not Grow 0 3 8 8 15 1 1 36Grew 1 2 3 2 9 3 2 22
Total 1 8 19 15 32 4 3 82
G=13.49, X(.05,7df)=14.07, .05 > p > .1
Table 4.2 Variation in disease symptom by canopy cover class.
Canopy Cover Classopen closed1 2 3 4 5 6 7 total
CankerYes 0 3 5 6 14 15 20 63No 0 6 13 15 29 18 10 91Total 0 9 18 21 43 33 30 154
Needle SpotYes 1 3 8 6 16 10 11 55No 0 6 13 15 30 28 24 116Total 1 9 21 21 46 38 35 171
Needle NecrosisYes 0 5 18 13 33 18 21 108No 1 4 3 9 14 20 14 65Total 1 9 21 22 47 38 35 173
Needles ChewedYes .0 3 5 8 11 15 12 54No 1 3 8 8 12 18 15 65Total 1 6 13 16 23 33 27 119
All G-tests (within damage category): P>. 25
72
0.
U,.0
'7,0.0
U'.0
0~00
U'o'-a
t4J U'00
U'0
0
Photosynthesis
AMm0lC0 2 /m 2 /2
0 0 0v 0g
~ ENOI I0
01 ((Art.
0 0 :0
*m 01'
* ~ 0
U~0'
0Ct
1b~d.~1U)0'
Figure 4.3. Comparative rates of A) net photosynthesis and B)dark respiration healthy needles versus bundles of needles inwhich some needles exhibit needle spotting.
10 -
8-
6-
4-
2-
0
0
I.09
0
S-= 5.56p<.01
x = 4.42
HEALTHY DISEASED
Dark Respiration Rate
t.1.99, pM.07
A A
HealthyNeedle
DiseasedCondition
0
0
Co
LUzI-z(00I-0z0.
c~4
0'U
0
0
0
-1 -
Uc~4
0Up.40U
IC.2Cu
.5.00
.3
a
soI I
Af
Figure 4.4. Rates of net photosynthesis for needles of varyingage. Measurements collected in A) February, prior to new needleexpansion, and B) Autumn.
Maximum Photosynthetic Rates
Ie0S
890
9
8
7.
6
5
4.
3-
4
Needle Age
September, 1991
5-
4.
3"
* *
I U _
0 1 2 3
Needle Age
F 5 6
0
00
U/)
C
(00o
>.0)
0.
1
0
(0
(0
0
o
2
IM . j" I
I - "W- "-It
capacity in fourth year needles (Figure 4.4). Further, this
pattern is repeatable throughout the growing season (Figure 4.4).
A comparison of greenhouse light response curves among the
five species examined here demonstrates that T. taxifolia has a
mean maximum net photosynthetic rate (8.3 4mol C02/m2/s) slightly
above all but T_ californica (Figure 4.5). In addition, T.
taxifolia reaches light saturation at PAR levels approximately
equivalent to other closely related species (Figure 4.5).
However, light curves for T. taxifolia from the field and in the
greenhouse are different in that maximum net photosynthesis
rates, as well as the light saturation point, are higher in
greenhouse plants (Figure 4.2, 4.5).
Net photosynthesis did not vary between species with respect
to relative humidity (Figure 4.6). The suite of species tested
all maximized rates of photosynthesis at about 20°C but varied in
the shape of their temperature response curves (Figure 4.7). In
particular, Taxus floridana and Torreya nucifera showed
particularly narrow ranges of temperature over which net
photosynthetic rates were high.
Finally, these five species were tested with respect to
drought tolerance. These data are presented as mean net
photosynthesis and mean stomatal conductance by day because the
mean decrease in percent of saturated pot weight did not vary
significantly between species (Figure 4.8). In addition, the
plants used for this experiment were of equivalent size. Thus,
the variable "day" can be used as a proxy for partial water
76
Figure 4.5. Comparative light saturation curves for five closelyrelated species: A) Torreya taxifolia, B) T. califoria )T
nucfera,, D) Ta31 floridaia and E) Torreagrandis.
Torrya l taxifol0.
0.000.0001
00
0
y0
500
0
@00.0 * 0.
10'10
U)
S6CM
04
0
1000- 1500---
2000 0
Taxus fioridana
00
000@0000
~00
OJO
NoF
500 1000 1500
Torreya callfomlca00
~ 00
0 0
I
*0 0 0
10
8
6
.4
-, 0'50 1000 1500 2000
Torreya grandis
0
*@' 00
5I 1000 1500
PAR (gL morn2 Is)
Torroya nucifemr
0
1500 2000
PAR (g mor/m2 Is)
4.
0
00
10 1
2000o
Oc
0%
Z w
0 '1
000 0
0~0~
2000
0.0
10-
8'
Ci 4
0
0
0@
0*0
0 .
0
I/
50 1000.
wI W 0
i- v m w a v 0 v 0 v I w I-
- 1
F
I- I ,
Figure 4.6. A comparison of net photosyntnetic rates acrossvariation in relative humidity for five closely related species:A) IorrYa taxioir.~Ja, B) TI. californica, C) L6.9. ncifer~a, D) Iax3JafJlo.i4dni1 and E) To9rre.ya gani
Torreym taxIfola
I0
11 II
109-
7.6.45.M4.3.2.1.0
109.6.7.6.5.
4..
2..
0.
0 20 40 60 80 100
000
Taxus fioridana
0 20 40 60 s0 100
Torreya cailfomica
40I w I a
80 so 104
1029.8-7.625.4.3.2.
0.0
Torreya grandis
0
S I
U - U - I
20 40 60 80
Relative Humidity(%
Torreya nucifera
0 i
I v I * I 1
40 60 80 100
Relative Humidity (%)
I
0 =
z ,oo
I * I * I * I * I
ON
10 -9-
7.6-
4-3.2-.1I0.
0 2
'I
U)..
ON.
'C
-o0
lo
9.
7.6.5.4.3.2.
10
100
0 20
I I I · I · I
- Onew
F w 5
mr-1
IO
I
4.4
Figure 4.7. A comparison of net photosynthetic rates acrossvariation in temperature for five closely related species: A)Tory taxi'folia, B) I. californica, )T nucifera,, D)Tasfloridana, and E) Iflreya rra~idis.
Tormya taxifolla10
0
I
8.
64
4-
2,
0l
Taxus floridana
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
1
0 10 20 30 40 50
Temperature ( 0C)
not photosynthesIsa dark rsplratlonI
50
E
N
0
E
E
0 10 20 30 40
Temperature ( OC)
Figure 4.8. A comparison of percent soil moisture through timewithout water for five closely related species.
AISI
6?
100
90
80
70)
Uw
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Day
100-
80-
60-
40-
20"
An-v0 1. 2 3
Day
I I I
4 5 6.
Figure 4.9. A comparison of mean net photosynthetic rate againsttime without water for five closely related species.
-- o-- Torreya taxifolla--- Torreya califomica=- Torreya grandis* Torreya nucifera
-- +-- Taxus floridana
41
I.
a
I I .i ' r r i
I -I I-1
pressure of the soil within pots. These results suggest that net
photosynthetic rates in T_. grandis and T_. nucifera are most
sensitive to water stress, and that T. taxifolia is as robust,
with respect to water stress, as any of the species tested
(Figure 4.9).
DISCUSSION
The field results presented here provide mixed support for
the hypothesis that T. taxifolia is currently stressed by low
light. The correlations of growth with light suggest that T.
taxifolia thrives in high light situations and that growth is
limited by low light. In contrast, preliminary growth response of
trees in experimentally created gaps have failed to support the
conclusion that low ambient light may be limiting growth in the
field. However, we require additional data over time to
adequately test whether our experimentally created gaps effect
growth in the field. Initial results from a greenhouse growth
experiment indicate that light levels below 400 Mmol/m2/sec PAR
significantly limit growth rate (Schwartz et al. unpublished
data). The low light saturation point (350 Mmol/m2 /sec PAR) of T.
taxifolia and the frequency with which they are found under dense
shade (Chapter 2) suggests that the tree can remain suppressed
under fairly dense shade for extended periods. An analysis of
tree-ring cores from long-dead trees would help clarify this
question. A cursory examination of tree cores from dead logs
appear to exhibit groups of wide and narrow annual growth rings
characteristic suppression and release growth patterns (Schwartz
81
personal observation). At the present time, most of the trees in
the census population are found in light environments far below
the light saturation point (Chapter 2, p32). Finally, the results
from the three-year census indicate little relationship between
light level and survivorship.
The data we present on differences in net photosynthetic
rates between healthy and diseased tissue, as well as needles of
differing ages, indicate that a foliar pathogen remains a
plausible candidate for the cause of the decline. However, one
must bear in mind that these results show a correlation between
disease and reduced net photosynthesis and do not prove cause and
effect. Although, the fact that we often measured healthy needlesV
immediately adjacent to diseased needles indicates a highly
localized infection, typical of foliar pathogens. Foliar
pathogens have typically been considered unlikely candidates for
catastrophic declines because they rarely kill the trees that
they infect (Manion 1981). Foliar pathogens can defoliate trees
in a single season,. but this is rarely sufficient to kill a tree.
However, T.taxifolia is different for several reasons.
First, we have shown that needles that bear pathogens have a
reduced capacity for carbon gain, a necessary but insufficient
pattern, if we are to believe that foliar pathogens are
responsible for this decline. This reduction in net
photosynthesis will result in plant' stress if, as we suggest, the
pathogen causes the decreased physiological activity, and is not
merely a secondary effect. Second, most conifers demonstrate a
82
marked decline in photosynthesis with needle age. In contrast,
needles up to four years of age on T. taxifolia are
photosynthetically active. Thus, defoliation of older needles, as
is often observed, would significantly reduce the total
photosynthetic capacity of the plant. Further, these older
needles are not readily replaced. Each year's single flush of
needles represent a small component of the plant's total
photosynthetic tissue. The observation that only about 70 * of
lateral branch buds and less than 30% of terminal branch buds
elongate each year (Chapter 2) indicates that it may take several
years for a defoliated tree to recover a full compliment of green
tissue. Since T. taxifolia is most frequently found as small
suppressed trees beneath a dense forest canopy, most trees are
probably close to the minimum carbon gain levels for survival.
The overstory of many of these ravine forests has been in a
maturation cycle for the past 30-50 years since selective cutting
of hardwoods in the mid-1900's. In a maturing forest there are
likely to be relatively few canopy gaps providing high light
levels for release of suppressed trees. The additional stress of
a single bout of heavy defoliation may have been sufficient to
kill most trees. If these factors are not fully responsible for
the decline, then they are at least likely to help explain why T.,
taxifolia has not recovered from the decline of 30 years ago.
This scenario, however, remains speculative until a foliar
pathogen can be isolated and used to test the foliar pathogen
hypothesis.
83
Our comparison of temperature, relative humidity and drought
response of T. taxifolia to other closely related species reveals
that we have no reason to suspect that T. taxifolia should be
more susceptible to environmental stresses than other similar
species. This is particularly interesting in light of the fact
that Taxus floridana grows over the same range and in the same
habitat as T. taxifolia, yet was not affected by a decline in
population size. Further, the similar response between T.
taxifolia and T. californica with respect to water stress is
somewhat surprising because the climate in the habitat of T.
californica is Mediterranean, and very drought prone. Finally, T.
taxifolia appears to be more tolerant to short-term water stress
than Taxus floridana. We would, again, predict the opposite if T.
taxifolia became susceptible to disease as a result of drought
stress, as has been suggested (USFWS 1986, Chapter 1). Thus, we
find no support for the hypothesis that environmental stress,
namely increased ravine temperature, decreased humidity, or
decreased soil moisture, would have rendered T. taxifolia
particularly susceptible to natural pathogens so as to cause the
catastrophic decline. While all of these stresses may contribute
to limit carbon gain, they do not seem to effect T. taxifolia to
a greater extent than other species, particularly a closely
related potential competitor, Taxus floridana.
84
CHAPTER 5
The Foliar Fungal Associates of Torreya taxifolia:
Pathogenicity and Sensitivity to Smoke
As stated previously (Chapter 1), there is no apparent
virulent introduced pathogen involved in the decline Torreya
taxifolia. The root of the problem in isolating potential
environmental mechanisms for the cause of the decline is in
isolating a pathogen. Here we present data that describe our
attempts to isolate pathogens from T_. taxifolia and establish
pathogenicity. However, all these attempts at establishing
pathogenicity of fungal associates have failed. We have not been
able to determine the cause, proximate or ultimate, for the
decline of T. taxifolia. Unfortunately, these pathogenicity tests
also do not exclude the potential pathogens that we tested from
further consideration. We have isolated several potential
pathogens, and tested them for pathogenicity. However, we cannot
say that these fungi might not behave as pathogens under a
particular set of environmental conditions that we have not
tested.
We have also been testing certain foliar fungal associates
for susceptibility to smoke. Through these tests we can assess
the likelihood of the fire suppression hypothesis for the decline
of T. taxifolia (see Chapter 1). This hypothesis suggests that
85
smoke from frequent fires in the adjacent uplands maintained low
populations of potential pathogens. Fire suppression, in the
1950's, allowed pathogen populations to explode, precipitating a
catastrophic population decline. Fungal associate isolation
strategies, pathogenicity tests, and smoke susceptibility tests
are described below.
METHODS
Fungal Isolation
All needles collected for fungal isolation were from wild-
grown trees. Attempts to isolate fungal pathogens from needle and
stem tissue have been repeated in all seasons over the past three
years. We used needles that exhibited foliar symptoms of disease,
such as needle spots and needle necrosis, as well as those that
appeared healthy. We have sampled needles from trees throughout
the range of the species. Needles of T. taxifolia collected for
fungal isolation were surface sterilized in a 10% bleach
solution, a 50% alcohol solution, a flame sterilization, or any,
and all, combinations of these techniques. Needles were immersed
in sterilizing solution for 1-to 3 minutes. Needles were either
cut or placed on artificial medium whole. Stem tissue was also
collected from wood tissue and surface sterilized in the same
manner as needles. Wood samples were healthy portions of cambium
or heartwood adjacent to cankers. We used several types of
artificial growth medium for our isolation attempts. These
include: Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA), Malt Agar, Water Agar, Corn
Meal Agar, and Water Agar with sterilized straw. By using a
86
variety of techniques we hoped to isolate as many different
potential pathogens as possible.
Pathogenicity Tests
A selection of foliar fungal isolates, derived from the
aforementioned methods, were tested for their pathogenicity on T.
taxifolia. A fungal spore slurry of at least 100,000 spores per
cc was misted onto test plants in a controlled environment
chamber. Plants used for pathogenicity tests were divided into
two groups. One group received full water treatment, while the
other was maintained under water stress conditions. Water stress
was defined as a soil moisture of between 70 and 80 percent of
saturated pot weight. This level of soil moisture was previously
observed to result in a significant decrease in photosynthesis
(see Chapter 4). Plants were maintained in these treatments for a
minimum of two weeks after inoculation.
Fungal Associates Susceptibility to Smoke
Smoke susceptibility in fungal isolates was tested in three
experiments. The first experiment tests the effect of smoke
residue on fungal colony growth. Clean culture plates were
placed, top open, in a closed chamber and subjected to smoke for
varying lengths of time from 0 to 20 minutes. Five replicate
plates for each smoke treatment were then inoculated with a small
fungal colony, not exceeding mm in diameter.. All plates were
placed at room temperature and illuminated by sunlight for the
duration of one week. Colony diameter was measured on a daily
basis throughout the experiment. The experiment ended when the
87
unsmoked plates reached the edge of the culture plate, in
approximately one week.
The second experiment tested the direct effect of smoke on
fungal colony growth. Colonies were begun in replicate culture
plates and allowed to grow to approximately 2 cm diameter. Five
replicate plates with fungal colonies were then smoked as per the
procedure described above. Subsequent colony growth was recorded
as above. Smoke for these treatments was cooled along a 20 ft
length of 6 inch duct pipe. The pipe was cooled by running water.
Thus, we eliminated any direct effect of high temperature on the
fungal colonies during smoke treatment.
A final experiment tested the effect of smoke residue on
fungal spore germination. We used five replicate smoked culture
plates for three time treatments (0, 1, and 5 minutes), as in the
first experiment. After smoke treatment a slurry of fungal spores
was spread over the smoked culture medium on each plate. Spores
were examined after 12 hours to-determine rates of spore
germination.
For each experiment clean glass slides were placed on the
tray at the time of smoke treatment. The glass slides were
scanned in a spectrophotometer (Bausch and Lomb Spectronic 70) at
470 nm to measure percent light transmission after smoke
deposition. Percent light transmission was measured for each
smoke treatment level as determined by time. A linear°i
relationship exists between percent light transmission and time
of smoke treatment (Figure 5.1).
88
.Figure 5.1. Biplot of the relationship between time in smokechamber and density of smoke residue deposited on clean glassslides in chamber. Smoke residue is measured as percent of lighttransmission through a clean glass slide'at 470nm.
100
0ZI
E
cu
90
80
70
60-
50
8
8
10 20 30
Time (Minutes)
Table 5.1 Fungi isolated from Torreya a ~iQ1± in the nativerange.
species Smoke 1st iuoo 1st spore
£lUAr.23 pe x xkcrimnamsp. x- x
------------------------------------
A mixture of pine straw and wiregrass was collected from
mature upland longleaf pine forests within the natural range of
Torreya taxifolia for use as fuels for all experiments. These
fuels are representative of the fuels in natural and managed
fire. We chose the most frequently isolated fungi in our tests of
smoke susceptibility. The fungal species used in each these
experiments are listed in Table 5.1.
Field Tests of Smoke Hypothesis
A field test of the amount of smoke deposited into ravines
through upland fire management was begun in the spring of 1992.
This experiment was delayed as a result of a poor fire season in
1991. Thus, the results from this experiment constitute smoke
from only a single fire treatment, and must be regarded as
preliminary.
Finally, a field test of the smoke hypothesis was begun in
1989. Twenty pairs of trees have been planted in the wild for
testing. One tree from each of these pairs was to have been
smoked each spring. We would then monitor the incidence of new
disease in these trees. As a result of vandalism this experiment
has been temporarily abandoned. We have lost 7 of our 40 plants
to natural causes that appear to be related to transplant shock.
None of these plants exhibited symptoms of disease. An additional
17 plants have been dug up over the two year period of this test.
We recently discovered the culprit and this disruption will now
cease. However, we have lost the bulk of our data from this
experiment through this vandalism. The remaining plants, however,
90
appear healthy and show no symptoms of new disease.
RESULTS
Fungal Isolation and Pathogenicity
During the course of three years we have isolated three new
potential pathogens from T. taxifolia (Table 5.1). Pestalotia
natens is an exceedingly common fungus found on nearly every T.
taxifolia throughout the natural range. This fungus is readily
isolated using PDA. Fusarium sp. was also frequently isolated on
PDA from both needles and cambium tissue. A species from the
genus Acremonium was infrequently isolated on a malt extract
agar. Finally, Botrysphaerium sp. was isolated on corn meal agar.
These four isolates were tested for pathogenicity on both well
watered and moisture stressed plants. All tests were negative.
Our list of fungal isolates varies somewhat from previous
studies (Alfieri et al 1967, USFWS 1986). The explanation for
this appears to lie in the fact that we used native trees for our
experiments, while previous studies used trees growing in the
wild as well as trees in lawns, at Maclay Gardens and on the
campus of the University of Florida (Alfieri et al 1967, El-Gholl
personal communication). These trees outside the natural range
are likely to be vectors of other horticultural diseases that may
not infect wild trees. Thus, we prefer our list of fungal
isolates with one exception. Phyllosticta sp. was isolated from
ascospores on needles in the wild (Alfieri et al 1967). We did
not focus on this species because we could not find the
symptomatic ascospores on trees in the field as described by El
91
Gholl (personal communication), and because it was tested for
pathogenicity before with negative results (El-Gholl 1984).
Smoke Susceptibility
The four fungal isolates used for pathogenicity tests were
also tested for susceptibility to smoke. The results are mixed.
Fusarium sp. and Pestalotia natens are both highly susceptible to
smoke and show decreased fungal growth in response to direct
smoke treatment (Figure 5.2), as well as smoke residue on
previously smoked plates (Figure 5.3). In addition, both of these
species show reduced spore germination (Figure 5.4), reduced
spore concentration (Figure 5.5) and reduced growth in
germinating spores (Figure 5.6) in response to smoke residue on
culture plates. In contrast, Acremonium and Botrysphaerium
demonstrate virtually no response to any level or type of smoke
treatment (Figure 5.2, 5.3).
Field tests of the ability of smoke to inhibit disease in T.
taxifolia have been unfruitful. To date, none of the plants that
remain in our experiment, smoked or unsmoked, shows any
characteristic symptoms of disease (needle spots, needle
necrosis, or stem cankers). In addition, we monitored one managed
fire for smoke deposition in ravines. Smoke residue (collected on
glass slides) exceeded the level expected from our minimum
experimental smoke treatment (95% transmission at 470nm for 1
minute smoke treatment - Figure 5.1) in only 1 of 48 samples.
This single sample was at the highest slope position and adjacent
to the fire line.
92
Figure 5.2. The effects of direct smoke treatment on growth offungal associates of L. taxiolUi. A) Pestalotia natans, B)Acremonium sp. Each point is .the mean of growth observed in fivereplicate petri plates containing PDA agar and stored at roomtemperature.
8
6·
E
.5a
w 1' ' I"
-U--
U
0 min1 min
3 min
5 min
10 min
20 min
30 min
0 1 ~2 3 4 5
day
8
U
I0
C.2 20U
a*. I - -
0
p
U
0 min
1 min
3 min
5 min10 min
20 min
7
day
a
rý
i -I ommmmrýLilw
I iit.I3..f
.4
6AUph,.44100
SU0
C
aa
0*.0 I
W 0
4J 0
o t
0 o u -P4
0a
0
0 ml
W4J $W W4 0
>44)
*Adc or~. 0
Eu4 -- > t
0 X - W~M au 4)Fa.
.I I
0r
Ur
IEI E0?10Y
(wa) *wLip Auoioo
E
LL
0
cccC'I I l
0o
0
(us*) welp) Auol(*
0
Figure 5.4. Histograms of spore germination failure rate forvarious smoke treatments (0, 1, 3 and 5 minutes). Replicatesterile PDA agar filled petri plates were inoculated with aslurry of spores from A) Fusarium sp. and B) Pestalotia natans.Germination rates were observed following 16 hours of incubationat room temperature.
40
30
GerminationFailure 20
(%)
10
0
20
GerminationFailure lO
(%)
0
A.) Fusarium
0 1 3 5
Smoke Treatment (minutes)
B.) Pestalotia
0 1 3 5Smoke Treatment (minutes)
Figure 5.5. Histograms of spore density for various smoketreatments (0, 1, 3 and 5 minutes). Replicate sterile PDA agarfilled petri plates were inoculated with a slurry of spores fromA) Fusarium sp. and B) Pestalotia natans. Spore density,reflecting differences in rates of spore deterioration, wereobserved following 16 hours of incubation at room temperature.
A.) Fusarlum300
Spore 200Density
(#/tran.)100
0
SporeDensity
(#/tran.)
0 1 3 5
Smoke Treatment (minutes
B.) Pestalotia
0 1 3 5
Smoke Treatment (minutes)
13 fde
)
1
Figure 5.6. Histograms of me4n spore growth rates for varioussmoke treatments (0, 1, 3 and 5 minutes). Replicate sterile PDAagar filled petri plates were inoculated with a slurry of sporesfrom A) Fusarium sp. and B) Pestalotia natans. Spore growth, asmeasured by the length of new mycelial strands were observedfollowing 16 hours of incubation at room temperature.
A.) Fusarium sp.300
200-
Growth(microns)
100-
O00 3 5
Smoke Treatment (minutes)
B.) Pestalotia sp.
Growth(microns
0 1
Smoke Treatment3 5
(minutes)
5
n-20U
n=20 n=20n=20
In,,20I
I
DISCUSSION
The results of our pathogenicity tests are not encouraging.
The failure to confirm pathogenicity in any fungal isolate could
either mean that we have failed to isolate the disease agent, or
that the conditions under which the disease agent becomes
pathogenic are restrictive and were not encountered during our
tests. The fact that none of our experimental plants in the field
have exhibited symptoms of disease supports the contention that
the foliar fungi only become pathogenic under severe plant
stress. Although this lack of disease symptoms in field tests
plants.is also consistent with another hypotheses: the disease
agent that decimated T. taxifolia has been reduced or eliminated
from the natural population and thus most T. taxifolia no longer
encounter the disease agent (see Chapter 1).
Alternatively, the disease agent that caused the population
decline may still infect plants in the wild. If the pathogen
requires the host plant to survive, such as most rust fungi, we
would not be able to isolate it on artificial growth medium.
Thus, we would get no positive pathogenicity tests using the
fungi we did isolate. If this is the case, the isolates from this
study may represent primarily secondary pathogens of little
consequence to plant health. However, it is hopeful to note that
the test plants we used were derived from cuttings of diseased
trees. If a host-specific pathogen is involved, it is likely to
be systemic and would have been transferred to cuttings collected
from the wild (for propagation for ex situ conservation).
98
However, these cuttings do not exhibit the symptoms of disease
observed in the wild. In addition, systemic rust fungi produce.
fruiting bodies on the outside of host plants. We have searched
plants in the wild for such symptoms of systemic infection. While
several fruiting bodies on T. taxifolia were observed in the
course of this work, most were identified as saprophytes that
appear to be derived externally, using the trunk for support of
its fruiting body structure (L. Crane, pers. comm.).
Collectively, these results suggest that the disease that
decimated T_. taxifolia may no longer be found. This hypothesis
requires that disease symptoms currently observed are secondary
pathogens breaking out on plants stressed by low light, low
nutrients or low soil moisture. While most foliar pathogens are
considered secondary infections, our evidence neither strongly
supports, nor rejects, this hypothesis.
Our test of the smoke hypothesis yielded mixed results. Two
of the four fungal associates tested proved sensitive to smoke
while the other two are not. Thus, it is possible that smoke
played a role in reducing foliar pathogen attack, but only if the
attacking agent is a fungus that is susceptible to smoke. Several
other, as yet untested, features must also hold for the smoke
hypothesis to be supported. It remains to be satisfactorily
tested whether smoke from managed fires settles in ravines in
sufficient quantities to maintain reduced populations of
potential pathogens. Further, we do not yet know the frequency of
fire required to maintain reduced fungal populations.
99
CHAPTER 6.
General Conclusions and Recommendations
In many respects the results of this 'research are exactly
what we would have predicted. First, the species may be in
decline for any number of reasons, a subset of which were'
previously reported in the US Fish and Wildlife Service Recovery
Plan (USFWS 1986, Chapter 1). Second, the species is continuing
to decline, as expected of plants with no sexual reproduction
that are also being suppressed beneath a relatively dense, young
closed canopy. Given that the species is exceedingly rare and
that the decline eliminated all mature seed producing trees, this
decline seems, if anything, remarkably slow (Chapter 2). Third,
the species is described by a low amount of genetic variability
(Chapter 3). This is consistent with the pattern of several
ancient species that have become narrowly endemic (Chapter 3).0
Fourth, the photosynthetic physiology of the species
confirms-that canopy shading could be suppressing the recovery of
what appear to be otherwise potentially healthy individuals
(Chapter 4). Fifth, the photosynthetic response of the species to
water and temperature stress does not indicate any special
consideration to these factors as potential contributors to the
demise of the species (Chapter 4). Sixth, the foliar pathogens
100
are associated with a significant decline in photosynthetic
capacity of T. taxifolia, consistent with the hypothesis that
foliar pathogens could become primary disease agents under
appropriate conditions (Chapter 4).
Seventh, we failed to contribute any significant advancement
in the realm of discerning a disease agent (Chapter 5). Finally,
smoke treatment may be important to the health of T. taxifolia.
This, however, depends on two specific factors that are yet to be
established: 1) the disease agent must be one of the foliar fungi
that is susceptible to smoke (although we have shown that these
exist), 2) the amount and frequency of smoke treatment required
to keep populations of the potential pathogen at low levels must
be on the order of smoke intrusion into ravines under natural
fire conditions.
We recommend that future research on the conservation
program for Torreya taxifolia should proceed along four lines.
First, continue efforts to isolate a primary pathogen,
particularly with respect to host-specific rust fungi. Second,
continue experiments that provide canopy openings to further test
if these facilitate recovery of vigorous individuals in the wild.
Third, attempt test plantings of closely related species (in
particular Torreya californica) to assess whether these species
are vulnerable to the diseases of T. taxifolia. This
recommendation is particularly important because of the ex situ
conservation program. We need to establish whether we would
jeopardize T. californica by incidental contact with T.
101
taxifolia. This could be an issue because the US Forest Service
Tree Genetics lab, perhaps the most capable institute to conduct
tissue culture propagation of T. taxifolia in the event that
systemic pathogens are found, is located near the range of T.
californica. As a result of this close proximity with the range
of T. californica, this lab has been heretofore excluded from
housing ex situ specimens of T. taxifolia. Finally, we recommend
additional test plantings to determine how newly planted trees
respond with respect to new disease and growth.
In addition, we make the following management
recommendations. First, monitoring of large populations should
continue on an annual basis. Second, canopy gaps should be
maintained around several of the larger, healthy trees in an
effort to stimulate sexual maturity, particularly among the few
trees that seem like they may be female.
Third, several deer exclosures were erected in 1987 to
protect large stems from deer antler rubs. These have largely
failed. Those that remain may be removed and no further
exclosures need be attempted at this time. While the exclosures
have succeeded by preventing further antler rub damage, they
increase the sphere of influence of woody debris falling from the
canopy. Several trees have been damaged as a result of limbs
hitting a deer exclosure cage and dragging it over the top of the
tree it was meant to protect. Thus, it is not clear which is the
lesser of these two problems. However, on-going stocking of young
pines in the adjacent uplands around trees on preserves in the
102
southern end of the range may help alleviate the pressure for
antler rub resources. Deer antler rubs have not appeared to be as
important in more northerly populations.
Fourth, large-scale restocking of the population with
individuals propagated from cuttings should be delayed until more
is known about the pathogens. Finally, fire management procedures
for uplands adjacent to ravines containing populations of T.
taxifolia should be adjusted in an attempt to maximize smoke
deposition to ravines under the constraint of fire management
safety guidelines.
The prospects for recovery of T. taxifolia in the near
future remain dim. However, with the current coordinated efforts
for ex situ propagation the species is unlikely to suffer
extinction. It is hoped that research beyond this project will
eventually make in situ recovery of T. taxifolia a possibility.
103
LITERATURE CITED
Alfieri, S.A.Jr., A.P. Martinez, and C. Wehlburg. 1967. Stem andneedle blight of Florida torreya, Torreya taxifolia Arn.Proceedings Florida State Horticultural Society 80:428-431.
Alfieri, S.A.Jr, K.R. Langdon, C. Wehlburg, and J.W. Kimbrough.1984. Index of plant diseases in Florida. Florida Department ofAgriculture and Consumer Services, Bull. 11.
Ayres, P.G. 1978. Water relations of diseased plants. pp. 1- 60in: Water Deficits and Plant Growth Vol 5. T.T. Kozlowski, Ed.Academic Press, New York.
Baker, W. 1982. A distribution survey of Taxus floridana andTorreya taxifolia in Florida. Unpubl. report to the U.S. Fish andWildlife Service.
Baker, W and Leonard. 1982. A distribution survey of Taxusfloridana and Torreya taxifolia in Florida. Unpubl. report to theU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Barnes, L.R. 1985. Clonal propagation of endangered native plantsRhododendron chapmanii Gray, Taxus floridana Nutt., and Torreyataxifolia Arn. unpublished Ph.d. dissertation, Univ. of Florida,Gainesville.
Bormann, P.H. 1990. Air pollutionand temperate forests withcreeping degradation. In The Earth in Transition: Patterns andProcesses of Biotic Impoverishment, G.M. Woodwell, Ed. CambridgeUniv. Press, Cambridge. pp 25-44.
Braun, E.L. 1950. Deciduous Forests of Eastern North America.Blakiston Co., Philadelphia. 596pp.
Burdon, J.J. 1987. Disease and Plant Population Biology.Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. 208p.
Burke, J.G. 1978. Human use of the California nutmeg tree,Torreya californica, and other members of the genus. EconomicBotany 29:127-139.
Chapman, A.W. 1885. Torreya taxifolia Arn., a reminiscence.Botanical Gazette 10:251-254.
Conkle, M.T., P.D. Hodgkiss, L.B. Nunnally, and S.C. Hunter.1982. Starch gel electrophoresis of conifer seeds: a laboratorymanual. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-64. pp. 1-18.
Cook, R.J. 1973. Influence of low plant water and soil potentialon disease caused by soil borne fungi. Phytopathology 63:451-458.
104
critchfield, W.B. 1984. Impact of the Pleistocene on the geneticstructure of North American conifers. In Proc. 8th North AmericanForest Biology Workshop, ed. R.M. Lanner, pp. 70-118. Logan,Utah.
Davy, A.J. and R.L. Jeffries. 1981. Approaches to the monitoringor rare plant populations. Pp. 219-232 in H. Synge, ed., TheBiological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation. Wiley, Cambridge.
E1-Gholl, N.E. 1985. Fusarium lateritium causing needle spots onTorreya taxifolia in Florida. Plant Disease 69:905.
Falk, D.A. and K.E. Holsinger. 1991. Genetics and Conservation ofRare Plants. Oxford University Press, New York. 283p.
Fritschen, L.J. and L.W. Gay. 1979. Environmental Instrumentation(ppl23-129). Springer-Verlag.
Godfrey, R.K. 1988. Trees. Shrubs. and Woody Vines of NorthernFlorida and Adjacent Georgia and Alabama. Univ. of Georgia Press,Athens, 734p.
Godfrey, R.K. and H. Kurz. 1962. The Florida torreya destined forextinction. Science 136:900-902.
Gray, A. 1889. A pilgrimage to Torreya. In: Scientific Papers ofAsa GrAy Volume II. selected by C.S. Sargent. Houghton MifflinCo. New York.
Griffin, D.M. 1978. Effect of soil moisture on survival andspread of pathogens. pp 175-197 in: Water Deficits and PlantGrowth Vol 5. T.T. Kozlowski, Ed. Academic Press, New York.
Hamrick, J.L. and M.J.W. Godt. 1989. Allozyme diversity in plantspecies. In Plant Population Genetics, Breeding, and GeneticResources, ed. A.H.D. Brown, M.T. Clegg,A.L. Kahler and B.S.Weir. pp. 43-63. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
Harper R.M. 1914. Geography and vegetation of northern Florida.Florida Geol. Survey Sixth Ann Report. 451p.
Harper, F. and A.N. Leeds. 1937. A supplementary chapter onFranklinia alatamaha. Bartonia 19:1-13.
Hepting, G.H. 1963. Climate and forest diseases. Annual ReviewPlant Physiology. 15:363-386.
Komarek, E.V., Sr. 1964. The natural history of lightning. Proc.Ann. Tall Timbers Fire Ecol. Conf. 3:139-183.
Komarek, E.V.,Sr. 1968. Lightning and lightning forces asecological forces. Proc. Ann. Tall Timbers Fire EQcol. Conf.
105
8:169-197.
Kurz, H. 1938a. Torreya west of the Apalachicola River. Proc.Fla. Acad. ci. 3:66-77.
Kurz, H. 1938b. A physiographic study of the tree associations ofthe Apalachicola River. Proc. Fla. Acad. Sci. 3:78-90.
Ledig, F.T. and M.T. Conkle. 1983. Gene diversity and geneticstructure in a narrow endemic, Torrey pine (Pinus torreyana Parryex carr.) Evolution 37:79-86.
Manion, P.D. 1981. Tree Disease Concepts. Prentice Hall, 399p.
Melching, J.S., J.R. Stanton, and D.L. Koogle. 1974. Deleteriouseffects of tobacco smoke on germination and infectivity of sporesof Puccinia graminis tritici and on germination of spores ofPuccinia striiformis, Pyricularia oryzae and an Alternariaspecies. Phytopathology 64:1143- 1147.
Melillo, J.M., T.V. Callaghan, F.I. Woodward, E. Salati and S.K.Sinha. 1990. Effects on ecosystems. In: Climate Change: The IPCCScientific Assessment, J.T. Houghton, G.J. Jenkins and J.J.Ephraums, eds. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. pp 283-310.
Mihail, J.D. 1979. Toxic effects of straw smoke on bean rust,snapdragon rust and on seed germination. Unpubl. M.S. thesis,Univ. California, Berkeley.
Millar, C.I., S.H. Strauss, M.T. Conkle, and R.D. Westfall. 1988.Allozyme differentiation and biosystematics of the Californianclosed-cone pines (Pinus subsect. Oocarpe). Syst. Bot. 13:351-370.
Moran, G.F., J.C. Bell, and K.C. Eldridge. 1988. The geneticstructure and conservation of the five natural populations ofPinus radiata. Can . For Res. 18:506-514.
Nei, M. 1977. F-statistics and analysis of gene diversity insubdivided populations. Ann Human Genet. 41:225-233.
Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and geneticdistance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583-590.
Nelson, R.M. 1932. Growth and mortality of chestnut sprouts. Jof Forestry 30:872-873.
Parker, J. 1965. Drought resistance in woody plants. BotanicalReview 22:241-289.
Parmeter, J.R.,Jr. and B. Uhrenholt. 1975a. Effects of smoke on
pathogens and other fungi. Proc. Ann. Tall Timbers Fire Ecol.
106
Conf. 14:299-304.
Parmeter, J.R.,Jr. and B. Uhrenholt. 1975b. Some effects of pine-needle or grass smoke on fungi. Phytopathology 65:28-31.
Platt, W.J. and M.W. Schwartz. 1990. Temperate hardwood forests.Pages 194-229 in Ecosystems of Florida (R.L. Myers and J.J. Ewel,eds). Univ. of Central Florida Press, Orlando.
Pratt, B.H., W.A. Heather, and C.J. Shepherd. 1973. Origin anddistribution of Phytophthora cinnamomi Rand. in Australian nativeplant communities and significance of its association withparticular plant species. Aust. J. Biology 26:559-573.
Pyne, S.J. 1982. ire in America: A Cultural History of Wildlandand Rural Fire. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
Reinsmith, W.H. 1934. Exploring for torreya trees in theApalachicola bluff country. Unpubl. report. Florida ForestService, Tallahassee.
Robbins, L.E. and R.L. Myers. 1989. Seasonal effects ofprescribed burning in Florida: a review. Report prepared for theFlorida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission.
Savage,. T. 1983. A Georgia station for Torreya taxifolia Arn.survives. Florida Scientist 46:62-64.
Schoeneweiss, D.E. 1975. Predisposition, stress, and plantdisease. Annual Review Phytopathology 13:193-211.
Schoeneweiss, D.E. 1978. Water stress as a predisposing factor inplant disease. pp. 61-99 in: Water Deficits and Plant Growth Vol5. T.T. Kozlowski, Ed. Academic Press, New York.
Schwartz, M.W. 1990. Conserving forest diversity in northernFlorida: From landscapes to populations. Phd dissertation.Florida State University, Tallahassee, 170p.
Sneath, P.H.A., and R.R. Sokal. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W.H.Freeman, San Francisco.
Sokal, R.R. and F.J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry, Second Edition. W.H.Freeman and Co. New York.Stalter, R. and 8. Dial. 1984. Environmental status of thestinking cedar, Torreya taxifolia. Bartonia. 50:40-42.
Struhsaker, T.T, J.M. Kasenene, J.C. Gaither, Jr. N. Larsen, 8.Musango and R. Bancroft. 1989. Tree mortality in the KibaleForest, Uganda: a case study of dieback in a tropical rain forestadjacent to exotic conifer plantations. Forest Egol. andManagement 29:165-185.
107
Swofford, D.L. and R.B. Selander. 1989. BIOSYS-1: A computerprogram for the analysis of allelic variation in populationgenetics and biochemical systematics. Release 1.7. IllinoisNatural History Survey, Champaign, IL.
Tebeau, C.W. 1980. A History of Florida 2nd ed. University ofMiami Press, Coral Gables, Florida. 527p.
Toops, C. 1981. The 'stinking cedar' is in big trouble. AmericanForests 87:46-51.
Travis, J. and R. Butter. 1986. Experimental designs andstatistical methods for demographic studies of rare plants. Nat.Areas J. 6:3-12.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1986. Florida Torreya Torreyataxifolia Recovery Plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Atlanta,Georgia. 42pp.
Warrington, S. and J.B. Whittaker. 1990. Interactions betweensitka spruce, the green spruce aphid, sulphur dioxide pollutionand drought. Environmental Pollution 65:363-370.
Woods, F.W. and R.E. Shanks. 1959. Natural Replacement ofchestnut by other species in the Great Smoky Mountains NationalPark. Ecology 40:349-361.
Woodvell, G.M. 1990. eTh Earth in Transition: Patterns andProcesses of Biotic Impoverishment. Cambridge Univ. Press,Cambridge, 530p.
Yarvood, C.E. 1959. Predisposition. in Plant Pathology. J.G.Horsfall, A.E. Dimond, eds. Academic Press. New York.
Zagory, D. and J.R. Parmeter, Jr. 1984. Fungitoxicity of smoke.Phytopathology. 74:1027-1031.
108
This page is intentionally blank.