Upload
hafwen
View
35
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Physics of the LHC. What do we hope to understand?. Martinus Veltman – 1980 Right now, the theorists are in the driver’s seat, but in thirty years, to make any progress at all in particle physics, we absolutely need input from experiments. Context – this was when a high energy hadron - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
The Physics of the LHC
What do we hope to understand?
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Martinus Veltman – 1980
Right now, the theorists are in the driver’s seat, but in thirty years, to make any progress at all in particlephysics, we absolutely need input from experiments.
Context – this was when a high energy hadroncollider was envisaged as a “world machine” toexplore the energy scale of 100 GeV to 1 TeV, the “symmetry breaking sector”.
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
How did we get here?Progress toward a unified theory of nature.
Fundamental particlesFundamental interactionsSpace, timeQuantum mechanicsThe structure of the Universe
All seemto berelated
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
e
The problem withclassical electro-magnetism
eCoulomb r
eE2
Classical self-energy of the electron:
Given the current limits onthe “size” of the electron, some new physics has to intervene to keep its mass small (relative to known scales),yet give it a finite mass.
What new physics?
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Quantum Field Theory!
Electromagnetism+quantum mechanics+special relativity =
QED!! (quantum electrodynamics)
e
e
Implication: A new formof matter emerges called “anti-matter”, which solvesthe problem of the electronself-energy.
How?
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
e
Consequence: virtual photon cloud with electron-positron pairs screen the electron’s charge
eCoulomb r
eE2
eee rmmeE 1log2
Before QED:
After QED:
Logarithmic terms can be handled through a process called “renormalization”, but not 1/r
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
This might be the end of the story,But…
Gravity: a relativistic quantum treatment is difficult
Relevant scale: Planck mass
1019 times the proton mass
Weak interactions: Experiment: from β decay, charged current interaction part of an isotriplet state, where the photon is included.
oZWW
W’s and Z are massive, photonremains massless
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
ee
du
sc
bt
The W,Z and photon interact with Fermions – leptons and quarks (3 “generations”)
Leptons
Quarks
Q=0
Q=-1
Q=2/3
Q=-1/3
1st 2nd 3rd
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Fundamental spin-1 objects
p p
Photon: Massless,Lorentz invariancerequires only transversepolarization states
W,Z: Massive, addlongitudinal polarizationstate
Issue: longitudinal polarization state grows with momentum. What are the implications?
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
ISSUE: processes like WW scatteringexceed unitarity above energy of 1 TeV
Cannot have a consistenttheory with massive spin-1particles.
The solution? An initially massless theory,where mass arises as a result of interactions
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
One version: the Higgs boson
The Higgs boson isa spin 0 object that interacts with the spin 1force carriers and givesthem mass – longitudinalpolarization states.
Quarks and leptons, too.
Shape of interactionpotential
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Peculiarities of the Higgs modelCoupling strength is proportional to mass.
Mass is inertial mass (what about gravity?)
The potential is a minimum with a non-zero field(so-called “vacuum expectation value” – VEV), denoted by Λ
Λ has been invoked to explain the “flatness” of the universe – inflation. But, at a much differentscale – 1015 GeV, not 103 GeV
Likewise another value of Λ has been used to explain dark energy – milli eV
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Data prefer light Higgs
Combination of precisiondata – masses of W, Z, top quark and other fits –Conclude that:
Mh< 207 GeV
Direct search limit from e+e-Zh
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Making the Higgs at the LHC
Decay modes – WW, ZZ, γγ,
pairs of b quarks, perhaps top,
if massive enough
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Hhigh luminosity (L=10^34)
Discovery should be assuredby LHC operating parameters
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Possible problems with the Higgs
• Unappealing– “The toilet of the standard model”
• Alternatives abound– Mass generated dynamically – Technicolor, gravity
• Naturalness– If unification includes the strong force,
problems arise – similar to the self-energy of the electron
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
u
u
d
d
d d
u u
Strong interactions – QCD (Quantum Chromodynamics)
g
g
g
g
g
Force carrier is the masslessgluon – 3 colors, 8 gluons.
Dominates action at LHC
Quark charge is “anti-screened”
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
t
_
tH
H
tH r
hE2
Fine tuning problem with the grandunified scale – supersymmetry predictsnew particle species – “sparticles”
Before supersymmetry
Ht~
HtttH rmmhE 1log2
After supersymmetryt~ is supersymmetric cousin of the
top quark
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Consequences of SUSY
• Preservation of “low” masses of particles compared to the grand unified scale
• Unification of forces actually line up• Doubling of number of particle species
– Mirrored by spin – ½ change• Lighest supersymmetric partner consistent
with dark matter
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
100
105
1010
1015
1020
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Evolution of Coupling Constants in SUSY
Mass(GeV)
1/
3
2
1
100
105
1010
1015
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70Evolution of Coupling Constants in the SM
Mass(GeV)
1/
3
2
1
Convergence of force strength
Without supersymmetry
With supersymmetry
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University 22
Dark Side of the Universe: Dark Matter
Dark Matter
Gasesous Matter
Dark Matter appears to be weakly interacting massive particle
Lightest SUSY particle has these properties !
Dark (invisible)
matter!
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Use SUSY cascades to the stable LSP to sort out the new spectroscopy.
Decay chain used is :
Then
And
Final state is
1o
02
02b b
g b b
01b b
Example of a SUSY event at the LHC
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Burning questions:
• Is there a Higgs? What is its mass• Is there another symmetry breaking
mechanism?• Is nature supersymmetric?
– If so, in what way?• Tie ins to cosmology• Is gravity involved (hidden spatial
dimensions)?
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard UniversityT. Virdee, ICHEP08 25
Looking for Extra Dimensions: Z’
1 fb-1
3 Dec. 2008 John HuthHarvard University
Summary
• The energy scale probed at the LHC offers the answers to a large number of questions that have perplexed physicists for over forty years.
• Only experiment can clear up these issues!