7
British Journal of Haematology , 2001, 115, 767–773 Review THE PHENOMENON KNOWN AS ACQUIRED ACTIVATED PROTEIN C RESISTANCE Resistance to the effect of activated protein C (APC), added to plasma from patients with a history of deep-vein thrombosis, was reported by Amer et al (1990), and the significance of inherited resistance was recognized by Dahlback et al (1993). In the majority of subjects, inherited resistance results from the Leiden mutation (factor V Leiden, FVL) in the gene coding for coagulation factor V (Bertina et al, 1994), although a number of other genetic variations have been described in the factor V gene associated with an APC resistance phenotype. Inherited resistance has been identified as a significant risk factor for venous thrombosis (Griffin et al, 1993; Koster et al, 1993), late fetal loss (Martinelli et al, 2000) and pre-eclampsia (Dizon-Townson et al, 1996). In recent years, the potential significance of resistance occurring in the absence of known mutations of the factor V gene has been recognized. A number of authors have coined the term acquired APC resistance for this phenomenon. The investigation of APC resistance by Dahlback et al (1993) was based on the effect of APC on an activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Since then, it has been recognized that the originally described aPTT-based test is not specific for the Leiden mutation. Indeed, in the intervening years, many strategies have been devised to render coagulation-based APC resistance assessments more specific for FVL (de Ronde & Bertina, 1994; Jorquera et al, 1994; Varadi et al, 1995; Nicolaes et al, 1996). Despite this drive to improve specificity, studies that used the original aPTT-based test or techniques that remain sensitive to a variety of causes of APC resistance (Gable et al, 1997; Nicolaes et al, 1997) have shown that the degree of resistance (in FVL-negative subjects) relates to: X thrombin generation (Clark et al, 1999; Lowe et al, 1999); X venous thrombosis risk (de Visser et al, 1999); X cerebrovascular disease risk (van der Bom et al, 1996; Kiechl et al, 1999); X pre-eclampsia risk (Clark et al, 2001a); X the presence of antiphospholipid activity (Hampton et al, 1994); X combined oral contraceptive use (Osterud et al, 1994; Henkens et al, 1995; Olivieri et al, 1995), in particular third- generation oral contraceptive use (Rosing et al, 1997). A substantial number of questions are posed by these observations. These are typified by the debate resulting from the observation that use of the third-generation combined oral contraceptive pill (COCP) is associated with more APC resistance than second-generation COCPs (Rosing et al, 1997). The authors used an APC resistance test based upon the thrombin generation resulting from tissue factor- activated plasma. However, a comparable differential of resistance has not been seen with aPTT-APC resistance tests (Henkens et al, 1995; Olivieri et al, 1995; Schramm & Heinemann, 1997), a finding that has subsequently been confirmed by Rosing’s own group (Curvers et al, 1999). Although this variance has highlighted the difficulty of diagnosing acquired APC resistance, it is likely to afford an opportunity to understand the mechanism of the additional risk of venous thrombosis (venous thromboembolim, VTE) associated with third-generation COCPs (Vandenbroucke & Rosendaal, 1997). From this debate, it is clear that the detection of acquired APC resistance requires consideration of the method of testing and the population under study. The APC resistance phenotype does, however, correlate with markers of in vivo thrombin generation (Freyburger et al, 1997; Clark et al, 1999; Lowe et al, 1999) and may indicate an overall prothrombotic phenotype. What information, then, does APC resistance testing give us and, given the myriad of influences upon it, can APC resistance testing (in non-FVL subjects) be tamed to provide a useful tool in the assessment of thrombotic risk? FACTOR V LEIDEN-SPECIFIC AND NON-SPECIFIC APC RESISTANCE TESTING In the assessment of APC resistance, distinction has to be drawn between factor V mutation-specific and non-specific assessments. In the main, factor V-specific assessments involve predilution of subject plasma. This may be achieved with factor V-depleted plasma (Jorquera et al, 1994), which allows the cofactors of the protein C/protein S system to be supplied by the added normal plasma. The dilution of factor V renders the test highly specific to the presence of factor V mutations. Similar strategies include predilution of the patient plasma before assessment of the effect of APC on factor VIIIa/factor Xa generation (Varadi et al, 1995), the effect of APC on factor Va generation (assessed in a prothrombinase system) (Nicolaes et al, 1996) or the effect of APC on a modified factor V assay (Le et al, 1995). These strategies exclude inhibitors and anticoagulants, but also render the test insensitive to other prothrombotic influ- ences. In addition to the original aPTT test, other methods of q 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd 767 Correspondence: Dr Peter Clark, Department of Transfusion Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

The phenomenon known as acquired activated protein C resistance

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

British Journal of Haematology, 2001, 115, 767±773

Review

THE PHENOMENON KNOWN AS ACQUIRED ACTIVATED PROTEIN C RESISTANCE

Resistance to the effect of activated protein C (APC), addedto plasma from patients with a history of deep-veinthrombosis, was reported by Amer et al (1990), and thesignificance of inherited resistance was recognized byDahlback et al (1993). In the majority of subjects, inheritedresistance results from the Leiden mutation (factor V Leiden,FVL) in the gene coding for coagulation factor V (Bertinaet al, 1994), although a number of other genetic variationshave been described in the factor V gene associated with anAPC resistance phenotype. Inherited resistance has beenidentified as a significant risk factor for venous thrombosis(Griffin et al, 1993; Koster et al, 1993), late fetal loss(Martinelli et al, 2000) and pre-eclampsia (Dizon-Townsonet al, 1996). In recent years, the potential significance ofresistance occurring in the absence of known mutations ofthe factor V gene has been recognized. A number of authorshave coined the term acquired APC resistance for thisphenomenon.

The investigation of APC resistance by Dahlback et al(1993) was based on the effect of APC on an activatedpartial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Since then, it hasbeen recognized that the originally described aPTT-basedtest is not specific for the Leiden mutation. Indeed, in theintervening years, many strategies have been devised torender coagulation-based APC resistance assessmentsmore specific for FVL (de Ronde & Bertina, 1994;Jorquera et al, 1994; Varadi et al, 1995; Nicolaes et al,1996). Despite this drive to improve specificity, studiesthat used the original aPTT-based test or techniques thatremain sensitive to a variety of causes of APC resistance(Gable et al, 1997; Nicolaes et al, 1997) have shown thatthe degree of resistance (in FVL-negative subjects) relatesto:

X thrombin generation (Clark et al, 1999; Lowe et al,1999);

X venous thrombosis risk (de Visser et al, 1999);X cerebrovascular disease risk (van der Bom et al, 1996;

Kiechl et al, 1999);X pre-eclampsia risk (Clark et al, 2001a);X the presence of antiphospholipid activity (Hampton

et al, 1994);X combined oral contraceptive use (Osterud et al, 1994;

Henkens et al, 1995; Olivieri et al, 1995), in particular third-generation oral contraceptive use (Rosing et al, 1997).

A substantial number of questions are posed by theseobservations. These are typified by the debate resulting from

the observation that use of the third-generation combinedoral contraceptive pill (COCP) is associated with more APCresistance than second-generation COCPs (Rosing et al,1997). The authors used an APC resistance test based uponthe thrombin generation resulting from tissue factor-activated plasma. However, a comparable differential ofresistance has not been seen with aPTT-APC resistance tests(Henkens et al, 1995; Olivieri et al, 1995; Schramm &Heinemann, 1997), a finding that has subsequently beenconfirmed by Rosing's own group (Curvers et al, 1999).Although this variance has highlighted the difficulty ofdiagnosing acquired APC resistance, it is likely to afford anopportunity to understand the mechanism of the additionalrisk of venous thrombosis (venous thromboembolim, VTE)associated with third-generation COCPs (Vandenbroucke &Rosendaal, 1997).

From this debate, it is clear that the detection of acquiredAPC resistance requires consideration of the method oftesting and the population under study. The APC resistancephenotype does, however, correlate with markers of in vivothrombin generation (Freyburger et al, 1997; Clark et al,1999; Lowe et al, 1999) and may indicate an overallprothrombotic phenotype. What information, then, doesAPC resistance testing give us and, given the myriad ofinfluences upon it, can APC resistance testing (in non-FVLsubjects) be tamed to provide a useful tool in the assessmentof thrombotic risk?

FACTOR V LEIDEN-SPECIFIC AND NON-SPECIFICAPC RESISTANCE TESTING

In the assessment of APC resistance, distinction has to bedrawn between factor V mutation-specific and non-specificassessments. In the main, factor V-specific assessmentsinvolve predilution of subject plasma. This may be achievedwith factor V-depleted plasma (Jorquera et al, 1994), whichallows the cofactors of the protein C/protein S system to besupplied by the added normal plasma. The dilution of factorV renders the test highly specific to the presence of factor Vmutations. Similar strategies include predilution of thepatient plasma before assessment of the effect of APC onfactor VIIIa/factor Xa generation (Varadi et al, 1995), theeffect of APC on factor Va generation (assessed in aprothrombinase system) (Nicolaes et al, 1996) or the effectof APC on a modified factor V assay (Le et al, 1995). Thesestrategies exclude inhibitors and anticoagulants, but alsorender the test insensitive to other prothrombotic influ-ences.

In addition to the original aPTT test, other methods of

q 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd 767

Correspondence: Dr Peter Clark, Department of TransfusionMedicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1

9SY, UK. E-mail: [email protected]

APC resistance assessment have been described that remainsensitive to a variety of influences (Kraus et al, 1995; Datiet al, 1997; Nicolaes et al, 1997). In particular, theassessment (described above) by Nicolaes et al (1997)examines the effect of APC on the generation of thrombin(measured by the formation of thrombin±a2-macroglobulincomplexes with time) from tissue factor-activated plasma. Inthe aPTT-APC resistance test described by Dahlback et al(1993), a ratio of the aPTT obtained in the presence ofadded APC/the aPTT obtained without added APC isderived. With this APC sensitivity ratio (APC:SR), a lowratio indicates high resistance.

COAGULATION FACTORS AND ACQUIRED APCRESISTANCE

A number of coagulation factors influence both the aPTT(Dahlback et al, 1993) and tissue factor (Nicolaes et al,1997) assessments. aPTT-APC resistance correlates posi-tively with factor VIIIc levels during pregnancy (Clark et al,1998), in association with markers of an inflammatorystate (Laffan & Manning, 1996; Mathonet et al, 1996), andin the population as a whole (Lowe et al, 1999). This isconsistent with the association of both factor VIIIc (Kosteret al, 1995; Kraaijenhagen et al, 2000) and blood group(Talbot et al, 1972; Meade et al, 1994) with thrombosis.aPTT-based resistance also correlates positively with factorIXc (Lowe et al, 1999), Xc and XIc levels (Kluft et al, 1999).This may, in part, be confounded by the relationship of thesevariables to each other and the aPTT (Lowe et al, 1997; vanHylckama Vlieg et al, 2000), although factor IXc has beenrecognized as an independent risk factor for venousthrombosis (van Hylckama Vlieg et al, 2000). In pregnancy,aPTT-APC resistance also correlates positively with factorVc (Clark et al, 1998), but this influence is only observed atextreme factor Vc levels in non-pregnant subjects (Colucciet al, 1994; Freyburger et al, 1996). An inverse relationshipto protein S is seen in pregnancy (Clark et al, 1998), andhigher resistance is observed in protein S-deficient subjects(de Ronde & Bertina, 1994). However, no influence onresistance is apparent at `normal' protein S levels (de Ronde& Bertina, 1994; Freyburger et al, 1997; Lowe et al, 1999).No relationship with `normal' levels of protein C has beenreported (Freyburger et al, 1997; Lowe et al, 1999), butincreasing resistance is associated with increasing antith-rombin levels (Freyburger et al, 1997; Lowe et al, 1999).This may indicate a compensatory response to a prothrom-botic state.

aPTT-APC resistance is also associated with lupusinhibitors (Bokarewa et al, 1994). The observation of higherresistance associated with anti-B2 glycoprotein-1 antibodiesand anticardiolipin antibodies (Martinuzzo et al, 1996)suggests that this effect is not solely in vitro interference withthe aPTT. Indeed, anticardiolipin antibodies can inhibit theaction of APC on factor Va (Oosting et al, 1993), and adose±response relationship between antiphospholipid-related resistance and thrombosis has been suggested(Aznar et al, 1997).

Like the aPTT test, the tissue factor-APC resistance test is

affected by lupus inhibitors and is unreliable in the presenceof anticoagulants (Nicolaes et al, 1997). Protein S deficiencyis also associated with higher tissue factor-APC resistance(Nicolaes et al, 1997). In pregnancy, a gestation-indepen-dent positive relationship of resistance with cholesterol,antithrombin and protein C activity and an inverserelationship with total protein S has also been reported(Clark et al, 2001b), although there is little other publishedinformation on the influence of coagulation factors on thistest.

OESTROGEN AND ACQUIRED APC RESISTANCE

Heightened APC resistance, as measured by an aPTT-basedmethod, was reported in association with COCPs containing# 37´5 mg of ethinyl oestradiol (Henkens et al, 1995). Inthis study, no distinction between second-generation (levo-norgestrel or norgestimate) and third-generation progesto-gens (desogestrel or gestodene) was made. The bulk ofsubsequent studies has shown that third-generation pro-gestogens are associated with a 1´4- to fourfold increasedrisk of VTE compared with second-generation COCPs(reviewed by Vandenbroucke et al, 2001). As noted above,use of the third-generation COCP is associated with moreAPC resistance than second-generation COCPs (Rosing et al,1997), when estimated by the thrombin generationresulting from tissue factor-activated plasma. Althoughnot seen with aPTT-based APCR assessments, this phenom-enon has been offered as an explanation for the additionalrisk of VTE associated with third-generation COCPs(Vandenbroucke & Rosendaal, 1997). Consistent with

Table I. Demographic influences on non-factor V Leiden APC

resistance.

Parameter Correlation with aPTT-APC resistance

Blood group Oa,b #Smokinga,b,c,d #Cholesterola,b,c,d "Triglyceridea,d "Female gendera,d,e "Agea,c,d "Menopausef #Acute-phase reactantsa,f "Blood pressureb,d "BMIa,d "FH APC resistance*g "Platelet activation²h "Ceruloplasminf,i "

A positive correlation of the parameter with APC resistance is

indicated by " and an inverse relationship by #.*In families with no known mutation of factor V.

²APC resistance observed in platelet-rich plasma.

Letters indicate the source publication: (Tosetto et al, 1997)a;

(Clark et al, 2001a)b; (van der Bom et al, 1996)c; (Lowe et al,1999)d; (Henkens et al, 1995)e; (Kiechl et al, 1999)f; (Tosetto et al,

2000)g; (Taube et al, 1999)h; (Ripoll et al, 1998)i. FH, family history.

768 Review

q 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 115: 767±773

observations of COCPs, recent epidemiological studies havesuggested that the use of hormone replacement therapy(HRT) is associated with a threefold relative risk of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) (Chae et al, 1997; Meade, 1997).A comparable increase in aPTT-APC resistance to thatobserved with oral contraceptive use has been observed inHRT users (Lowe et al, 1999), a relationship that may be

independent of factor VIIIc and IXc (Nebulsi et al, 1993;Woodward et al, 1997).

DEMOGRAPHIC FACTORS AND ACQUIRED APCRESISTANCE

A number of demographic variables also influence the

Fig 1. Potential mechanisms of acquired APC resistance. The potential link between demographic factors and APC resistance (APCR) via

alterations in coagulation factor levels is shown. FVc, factor Vc; PS, protein S; FVIIIc, factor VIIIc; HRT, combined hormone replacement

therapy. A potential linkage from these factors via APCR and thrombin generation to pre-eclampsia (PET), venous thrombosis (VTE) and stroke

(CVA) is outlined. Higher factor VIIc levels (FVIIc) are associated with higher triglyceride (TRIG) levels. The mechanism of triglyceride-relatedAPCR is unknown. Only the additional coagulation effect of third-generation combined oral contraceptives (third-generation COCPs) over

second-generation COCPs is shown. Third-generation COCPs are associated with higher tissue factor-APC resistance (not aPTT-APCR) and

higher FVIIc levels than second-generation COCPs. The mechanism of higher tissue factor-APC resistance is unknown, but there may be a

direct effect of FVIIc. #A link between factor V Leiden (FVL), factor V Cambridge (FVC), or the HR2 haplotype (HR2) and cerebrovasculardisorders is not proven. Letters indicate the source publication: (Tosetto et al, 1997)a; (Clark et al, 2001a)b; (Clark et al, 1998)c; (Rosing et al,

1997)d; (Lowe et al, 1999)e; (de Visser et al, 1999)f; (Laffan & Manning, 1996)g; (Mathonet et al, 1996)h; (Clark et al, 1999)I; (van der Bom et al,

1996)j; (Kiechl et al, 1999)k; (Bertina et al, 1994)l; (Williamson et al, 1998)m; (Bernardi et al, 1997)n; (van Baal et al, 2000)8; (reviewed by

Winkler, 1998)p.

q 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 115: 767±773

Review 769

aPTT-APC resistance test (Table I). These reflect the positiveinfluence of oestrogen, factor VIII and acute-phase reactantson APC resistance (Fig 1), and the majority are also inkeeping with the concept of APC resistance as a phenotypicmarker of venous and arterial disease risk. The relationshipbetween smoking and a reduction in APC resistanceappears, however, to be incongruous. There is, indeed,conflicting evidence that smoking is a risk factor for VTE(Marks & Emerson, 1974; Emerson & Marks, 1977; Prescottet al, 1978; Goldhaber et al, 1997). However, the relation-ship of smoking to APC resistance is consistent with themitigating effect of smoking on the risk of pre-eclampsia(van der Velde & Treffers, 1985; Klonoff-Cohen et al, 1993).Serum lipid levels are an accepted risk factor for arterialdisease but are not generally considered to be a risk factorfor venous thrombosis. Small preliminary studies have,however, suggested a link between serum lipids, thrombingeneration (MacCallum et al, 2000) and VTE (Kawasaki et al,1995, 1997).

APC RESISTANCE AS AN INDEPENDENT RISKFACTOR

Given the number of potential confounders (Table I), it isperhaps not surprising that only a few studies haveattempted to determine whether acquired APC resistanceis an independent risk factor for thrombotic disease. Thesestudies have avoided the use of artificial cut-offs tocharacterize subjects as having APC resistance and haveconsidered resistance as a relative phenomenon. In 1996, areport from the Rotterdam Study described a 2´6-fold (95%CI 1´2±5´6) increased risk of cerebrovascular disease whensubjects with the highest quintile of resistance werecompared with those with the lowest (van der Bom et al,1996). No significant difference in the risk was observedwhen the data were corrected for age, sex, cholesterol leveland FVL status. In a population study by Kiechl et al (1999),a dose±response relationship between quintiles of resistanceand the occurrence of femoral artery and carotid arterystenosis was observed. When adjusted for sex, menopausestatus, smoking and factors related to factor VIII levels (age,the aPTT and acute phase-reactants), a strengthening of therelationship was observed. Furthermore, no significantdifference in the three- to fourfold risk of stenoses wasobserved when the data were adjusted for the presence ofthe Leiden mutation. As noted above, smoking is associatedwith lower APC resistance and a reduced risk of pre-eclampsia (PET). In a study of FVL-negative subjects, thedegree of resistance in the first trimester of pregnancyrelated to the risk of development of pre-eclampsia in theindex pregnancy (Clark et al, 2001a). A sevenfold risk ofpre-eclampsia was observed for those in the highest quartilewhen compared with those in the lowest. In this study,regression for those factors that confounded the relationship(smoking and booking blood pressure) revealed a persistingrelationship between APC resistance and the risk ofsubsequent PET. The confounding of aPTT-APC resistanceby factor VIIIc levels was addressed directly by de Visser et al(1999). In FVL-negative, lupus inhibitor-negative subjects,

the highest quartile of resistance was associated with afourfold risk of venous thrombosis when compared withthose subjects in the lowest quartile. Forty-five per cent ofthose subjects in the highest quartile had a factor VIIIc level. 150 iu/dl. Although adjustment for FVIIIc levels, age andsex did not abolish the relationship with thrombosis, therelative risk associated with the highest quartile wasreduced to 2´5 (95% CI 1´5±4´2). Thus, APC resistanceappears to be an independent marker of a prothromboticphenotype.

FROM OBSERVATION TO INTERVENTION

The relationship with such a wide variety of prothromboticinfluences (Table I, Fig 1), markers of in vivo thrombingeneration (Clark et al, 1999; Lowe et al, 1999) andthrombotic disease (van der Bom et al, 1996; de Visser et al,2000; Clark et al, 2001a) suggests that APC resistance is acommon mechanism whereby a number of risk factors forarterial and venous thrombosis promote thrombogenesis.

Could this disparate phenomenon usefully be used as ascreening tool to determine risk? A number of questionswould have to be answered before this could be considered:

X What type of test should be used? Clearly, eachresistance assessment gives different demographic andcoagulation information. At present, there is greaterexperience in the use and interpretation of the aPTT-basedtest. It would seem likely that this would become the mostwidely applicable acquired APC resistance screening tool.

X How should testing be standardized? Standardizationhas already been recommended for aPTT-APC resistancescreening for FVL (de Ronde & Bertina, 1994) and, given thevariety of influences upon it, an aPTT test for acquiredresistance would require population-specific referenceranges.

X When is the appropriate time to test? Some resistancerelates to acute-phase reactants, and the link between thisand future thrombotic risk is unknown. Furthermore,testing for acquired resistance can only be achieved onnon-anticoagulated patients.

More importantly, in addition to these technical con-siderations, a number of fundamental principles of screen-ing require to be addressed:

X Will screening alter management? It is not yet clearwhether this question has been answered for heritableresistance (Ridker et al, 1995; Rintelen et al, 1996; Simioniet al, 1997; Eichinger et al, 1999; Kearon et al, 1999).Elevated levels of in vivo markers of thrombin generation areseen in heritable APC resistance (Martinelli et al, 1996;Simioni et al, 1996), and these markers may be reduced byanticoagulation (Takahashi et al, 1993; Koefoed et al,1997). Owing to the attendant risk of bleeding, the use ofanticoagulants requires a subtle balance of risks andbenefits. Unlike FVL, acquired APC resistance does relateto a number of thrombotic risk factors, such as cholesterol,blood pressure and body mass index (BMI) (Table I). It isconceivable that intervention to reduce these thromboticrisk factors could offer additional modalities of therapy toreduce APC resistance and thrombotic risk.

770 Review

q 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 115: 767±773

X How is an abnormal resistance defined? A number ofstudies have shown that there is a dose±response relation-ship between the degree of resistance and the developmentof disease. That the risks of vascular disease (in those withthe lowest quartile/quintiles of resistance) are comparablewith those observed in heritable resistance is remarkable,given that the degree of resistance is much less. Interventionto reduce disease would clearly require a new definition ofabnormal or unacceptable resistance. The move fromprogressive risk to action limits is, thankfully, not new inthe field of vascular disease.

The discovery of heritable APC resistance has transformedour understanding of VTE. The subsequent discovery ofcorresponding defects in the factor V gene has resulted in aconcentration on refinement of coagulation tests to improvetheir specificity and sensitivity for these mutations. In recentyears, the significance of non-Leiden resistance has beenrealized. Much work is still required to determine whetherthis prothrombotic phenotype usefully can be added toroutine thrombophilia screening.

Department of Transfusion Medicine,Ninewells Hospital and Medical School,Dundee, and Department ofHaematology, Royal Infirmary,Glasgow, UK

Peter ClarkIsobel D. Walker

REFERENCES

Amer, L., Kisiel, W., Searles, R.P. & Williams, R.C. (1990)

Impairment of the protein C anticoagulant pathway in a patientwith systemic lupus erythematosus, anticardiolipin antibodies

and thrombosis. Thrombosis Research, 57, 247±258.

Aznar, J., Villa, P., Espana, F., Estelles, A., Grancha, S. & Falco, C.(1997) Activated protein C resistance phenotype in patients with

antiphospholipid antibodies. Journal of Laboratory and Clinical

Medicine, 130, 202±208.

Bernardi, F., Faioni, E.M., Castoldi, E., Lunghi, B., Castaman, G.,Sacchi, E. & Mannucci, P.M. (1997) A factor V genetic

component differing from factor V R506Q contributes to the

activated protein C resistance phenotype. Blood, 90, 1552±1557.

Bertina, R.M., Koeleman, B.P., Koster, T., Rosendaal, F.R., Dirven,R.J., de Ronde, H., van der Velden, P.A. & Reitsma, P.H. (1994)

Mutation in blood coagulation factor V associated with resistance

to activated protein C. Nature, 369, 64±67.Bokarewa, M.I., Blomback, M., Egberg, N. & Rosen, S. (1994) A new

variant of interaction between phospholipid antibodies and the

protein C system. Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, 5, 37±41.

Chae, C.U., Ridker, P.M. & Manson, J.E. (1997) Postmenopausalhormone replacement therapy and cardiovascular disease.

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 78, 770±780.

Clark, P., Brennand, J., Conkie, J.A., McCall, F., Greer, I.A. & Walker,

I.D. (1998) Activated protein C sensitivity, protein C, protein Sand coagulation in normal pregnancy. Thrombosis and Haemos-

tasis, 79, 1166±1170.

Clark, P., Walker, I.D. & Greer, I. (1999) Acquired activated protein-C resistance in pregnancy and association with increased

thrombin generation and fetal weight. Lancet, 353, 292±293.

Clark, P., Sattar, N., Walker, I.D. & Greer, I.A. (2001a) The Glasgow

outcome, APCR and lipid (GOAL) pregnancy study: significanceof pregnancy-associated activated protein C resistance. Thrombo-

sis and Haemostasis, 85, 30±35.

Clark, P., Rosing, J., Curvers, J., Tans, G., Conkie, J., Walker, I.D. &

Greer, I.A. (2001b) The Glasgow outcome, APC resistance and

lipid (goal) pregnancy study: pregnancy-associated APC resis-tance. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 86 (suppl.), 3002.

Colucci, M., Ciavarella, N., Giliberti, M.G. & Semeraro, N. (1994)

Resistance to activated protein C (APC): influence of factor Vlevels. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 72, 987±988.

Curvers, J., Christella, M., Thomassen, L.G.D., Nicolaes, G.A.F., van

Oerle, R., Hamulyak, K., Hemker, H.C., Tans, G. & Rosing,

J. (1999) Acquired APC resistance and oral contraceptives:difference between two functional tests. British Journal of

Haematology, 105, 88±94.

Dahlback, B., Carlsson, M. & Svensson, P.J. (1993) Familial

thrombophilia due to a previously unrecognized mechanismcharacterized by poor anticoagulant response to activated protein

C: prediction of a cofactor to activated protein C. Proceedings of the

National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 90, 1004±1008.

Dati, F., Hafner, G., Erbes, H., Prellwitz, W., Kraus, M., Niemann, F.,

Noah, M. & Wagner, C. (1997) ProC Global: the first functional

screening assay for the complete protein C pathway. Clinical

Chemistry, 43, 1719±1723.

de Ronde, H. & Bertina, R.M. (1994) Laboratory diagnosis of APC-

resistance: a critical evaluation of the test and the development of

diagnostic criteria. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 72, 880±886.

de Visser, M.C., Rosendaal, F.R. & Bertina, R.M. (1999) A reducedsensitivity for activated protein C in the absence of factor V Leiden

increases the risk of venous thrombosis. Blood, 93, 1271±1276.

de Visser, M.C., Guasch, J.F., Kamphuisen, P.W., Vos, H.L.,Rosendaal, F.R. & Bertina, R.M. (2000) The HR2 haplotype of

factor V: effects on factor V levels, normalized activated protein C

sensitivity ratios and the risk of venous thrombosis. Thrombosis

and Haemostasis, 83, 577±582.

Dizon-Townson, D.S., Nelson, L.M., Easton, K. & Ward, K. (1996)

The factor V Leiden mutation may predispose women to severe

preeclampsia. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 175,

902±905.

Eichinger, S., Weltermann, A., Philipp, K., Hafner, E., Kaider, A.,

Kittl, E.M., Brenner, B., Mannhalter, C., Lechner, K. & Kyrle, P.A.

(1999) Prospective evaluation of hemostatic system activationand thrombin potential in healthy pregnant women with and

without factor V Leiden. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 82,

1232±1236.

Emerson, P.A. & Marks, P. (1977) Preventing thromboembolismafter myocardial infarction: effect of low-dose heparin or

smoking. British Medical Journal, 1, 18±20.

Freyburger, G., Bilhou-Nabera, C., Dief, S., Javorschi, S., Labrouche,

S., Lerebeller, M.J. & Boisseau, M.R. (1996) Technical andbiological conditions influencing the functional APC resistance

test. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 75, 460±465.

Freyburger, G., Javorschi, S., Labrouche, S. & Bernard, P. (1997)Proposal for objective evaluation of the performance of various

functional APC-resistance tests in genotyped patients. Thrombosis

and Haemostasis, 78, 1360±1365.

Gable, P.S., Le, D.T., McGehee, W. & Rapaport, S.I. (1997) A Protac-based screening test for activated protein C-resistant factor Va

and other defects of the protein C anticoagulant pathway. Blood

Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, 8, 327±335.

Goldhaber, S.Z., Grodstein, F., Stampfer, M.J., Manson, J.E., Colditz,

G.A., Speizer, F.E., Willet, W.C. & Hennekens, C.H. (1997) A

prospective study of risk factors in pulmonary embolism in

women. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277,642±645.

Griffin, J.H., Evatt, B., Wideman, C. & Fernandez, J.A. (1993)

q 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 115: 767±773

Review 771

Anticoagulant protein C pathway defective in majority of

thrombophilic patients. Blood, 82, 1989±1993.

Hampton, K.K., Preston, F.E. & Greaves, M. (1994) Resistance to

activated protein C. New England Journal of Medicine, 331, 130.

Henkens, C.M.A., Bom, V.J., Seinen, A.J. & van der Meer, J. (1995)

Sensitivity to activated protein C: influence of oral contraceptivesand sex. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 73, 402±404.

Jorquera, J.I., Montoro, J.M., Fernandez, M.A., Aznar, J.A. & Aznar, J.

(1994) Modified test for activated protein C resistance. Lancet, 344,

1162±1163.

Kawasaki, T., Kambayashi, J. & Sakon, M. (1995) Hyperlipidemia: a

novel etiologic factor in deep vein thrombosis. ThrombosisResearch, 79, 147±151.

Kawasaki, T., Kambayashi, J.I., Ariyoshi, H., Sakon, M., Suehisa, E.& Mondedn, M. (1997) Hypercholesterolemia as a risk factor for

deep-vein thrombosis. Thrombosis Research, 88, 67±73.

Kearon, C., Gent, M., Hirsh, J., Wietz, J., Kovacs, M.J., Anderson,

D.R., Turpie, A.G., Green, D., Ginsberg, J.S., Wells, P., Mackinnon,

B. & Julian, J.A. (1999) A comparison of three months ofanticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode

of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. New England Journal of

Medicine, 340, 901±907.

Kiechl, S., Muigg, A., Santer, P., Mitterer, M., Egger, G., Oberhol-

lenzer, M., Oberhollenzer, F., Mayr, A., Gasperi, A., Poewe, W. &Willeit, J. (1999) Poor response to activated protein C as a

prominent risk predictor of advanced atherosclerosis and arterial

disease. Circulation, 99, 614±619.

Klonoff-Cohen, H., Edelstein, S. & Savitz, D. (1993) Cigarette

smoking and preeclampsia. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 81,541±544.

Kluft, C., Meijer, P., Gram, J. & Jesperson, J. (1999) Acquiredactivated protein C resistance. Lancet, 353, 1882.

Koefoed, B.G., Feddersen, C., Gullov, A.L. & Petersen, P. (1997) Effect

of fixed minidose warfarin, conventional dose warfarin and

aspirin on INR and prothrombin fragment 1 1 2 in patients with

atrial fibrillation. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 77, 845±848.

Koster, T., Rosendaal, F.R., de Ronde, H., Briet, E., Vandenbroucke,J.P. & Bertina, R.M. (1993) Venous thrombosis due to poor

anticoagulant response to activated protein C: Leiden Thrombo-

philia Study. Lancet, 342, 1503±1506.

Koster, T., Blann, A.D., Briet, E., Vandenbroucke, J.P. & Rosendaal,

F.R. (1995) Role of clotting factor VIII in effect of von Willebrandfactor on occurrence of deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet, 345,

152±155.

Kraaijenhagen, R.A., In't Anker, P.S., Koopman, M.M.W., Reitsma,

P.H., Prins, M.H.H., van den Ende, A. & Buller, H.R. (2000) High

plasma concentration of factor VIIIc is a major risk factor for

venous thromboembolism. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 83, 5±9.

Kraus, M., Noah, M. & Fickenscher, K. (1995) The PCAT ± a simplescreening assay for assessing the functionality of the protein C

anticoagulant pathway. Thrombosis Research, 79, 217±222.

Laffan, M.A. & Manning, R. (1996) The influence of factor VIII on

measurement of activated protein C resistance. Blood Coagulation

and Fibrinolysis, 7, 761±765.

Le, D.T., Griffin, J.H., Greengard, J.S., Mujumdar, V. & Rapaport, S.I.

(1995) Use of a generally applicable tissue factor ± dependentfactor V assay to detect activated protein C-resistant factor Va in

patients receiving warfarin and in patients with a lupus

anticoagulant. Blood, 85, 1704±1711.

Lowe, G.D.O., Rumley, A., Woodward, M., Morrison, C.E., Philippou,

H., Lane, D.A. & Tunstall-Pedoe, H. (1997) Epidemiology ofcoagulation factors, inhibitors and activation markers: The third

Glasgow MONICA survey 1. Illustrative reference ranges by age,

sex and hormone use. British Journal of Haematology, 97, 775±

784.

Lowe, G.D.O., Rumley, A., Woodward, M., Reid, E. & Rumley, J.

(1999) Activated protein C resistance and the FV:R506Q

mutation in a random population sample-associations withcardiovascular risk factors and coagulation variables. Thrombosis

and Haemostasis, 81, 918±924.

MacCallum, P.K., Cooper, J.A., Martin, J., Howarth, D.J., Meade, T.W.

& Miller, G.J. (2000) Haemostatic and lipid determinants of

prothrombin fragment F112 and d-dimer in plasma. Thrombosis

and Haemostasis, 83, 421±426.

Marks, P. & Emerson, P.A. (1974) Increased incidence of deep vein

thrombosis after myocardial infarction in non-smokers. BritishMedical Journal, 3, 232±234.

Martinelli, I., Bottasso, B., Duca, F., Faioni, E. & Mannucci, P.M.

(1996) Heightened thrombin generation in individuals withresistance to activated protein C. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 75,

703±705.

Martinelli, I., Taioli, E., Cetin, I., Marinani, A., Gerosa Silla, V.,

Bozzo, M. & Mannucci, P.M. (2000) Mutations in coagulation

factors in women with unexplained late pregnancy loss. New

England Journal of Medicine, 343, 1015±1018.

Martinuzzo, M., Forastiero, R., Adamczuk, Y., Cerrato, G. &

Carreras, L.O. (1996) Activated protein C resistance in patientswith anti-beta2 glycoprotein-I antibodies. Blood Coagulation and

Fibrinolysis, 7, 702±704.

Mathonet, F., de Mazancourt, P., Denninger, M.-H., Morot, M.,

Bennattar, N. & Giudicelli, Y. (1996) Role of factor VIII on

activated protein C resistance ratio in inflammatory diseases.

British Journal of Haematology, 95, 423±425.

Meade, T.W. (1997) Hormone replacement therapy and haemo-

static function. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 78, 765±769.

Meade, T.W., Cooper, J.A., Stirling, Y., Howarth, D.J., Ruddock, V. &

Miller, G.J. (1994) Factor VIII, ABO blood group and the

incidence of ischaemic heart disease. British Journal of Haematol-ogy, 88, 601±607.

Nebulsi, A.A., Folsom, A.R., White, A., Patsch, W., Heiss, G., Wu,K.K. & Szklo, M. (1993) Association of hormone-replacement

therapy with various cardiovascular risk factors in post-

menopausal women. New England Journal of Medicine, 328,

1069±1075.

Nicolaes, G.A., Thomassen, M.C., van Oerle, R., Hamulyak, K.,

Hemker, H.C., Tans, G. & Rosing, J. (1996) A prothrombinase-based assay for detection of resistance to activated protein C.

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 76, 404±410.

Nicolaes, G.A., Thomassen, M.C., Tans, G., Rosing, J. & Hemker,

H.C. (1997) Effect of activated protein C on thrombin generation

and on the thrombin potential in plasma of normal and APC-

resistant individuals. Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, 8, 28±38.

Olivieri, O., Friso, S., Manzato, F., Guella, A., Bernardi, F., Lunghi, B.,

Girelli, D., Azzini, M., Brocco, G. & Russo, C. (1995) Resistance toactivated protein C in healthy women taking oral contraceptives.

British Journal of Haematology, 91, 465±470.

Oosting, J.D., Derksen, R.H., Bobbink, I.W., Hackeng, T.M., Bouma,B.N. & de Groot, P.G. (1993) Antiphospholipid antibodies directed

against a combination of phospholipids with prothrombin,

protein C, or protein S: an explanation for their pathogenicmechanism. Blood, 81, 2618±2625.

Osterud, B., Robertsen, R., Asvang, G.B. & Thijssen, F. (1994)

Resistance to activated protein C is reduced in women using oralcontraceptives. Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, 5, 853±854.

Prescott, R.J., Jones, D.R., Vailescu, C., Henderson, J.T. & Ruckley,C.V. (1978) Smoking and risk factors in deep vein thrombosis.

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 40, 128±133.

772 Review

q 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 115: 767±773

Ridker, P.M., Miletich, J.P., Stampfer, M.J., Goldhaber, S.Z., Lind-

paintner, K. & Hennekens, C.H. (1995) Factor V Leiden and risks

of recurrent idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Circulation, 92,2800±2802.

Rintelen, C., Pabinger, I., Knobl, P., Lechner, K. & Mannhalter, C.

(1996) Probability of recurrence of thrombosis in patients withand without factor V Leiden. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 75,

229±232.

Ripoll, L., Mazoyer, E., Baudin, B., Lacam, S., Varsat, B. & Drouet,

L.O. (1998) Can high plasma ceruloplasmin levels cause acquiredactivated protein C resistance? Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 79,

449±450.

Rosing, J., Tans, G., Nicolaes, G.A., Thomassen, M.C., van Oerle, R.,

van der Ploeg, P.M., Heijnen, P., Hamulyak, K. & Hemker, H.C.(1997) Oral contraceptives and venous thrombosis: different

sensitivities to activated protein C in women using second- and

third-generation oral contraceptives. British Journal of Haematol-ogy, 97, 233±238.

Schramm, W. & Heinemann, L.A. (1997) Oral contraceptives and

venous thromboembolism: acquired APC resistance? British

Journal of Haematology, 98, 491±492.Simioni, P., Scarano, L., Gavasso, S., Sardella, C., Girolami, B.,

Scudeller, A. & Girolami, A. (1996) Prothrombin fragment 112

and thrombin-antithrombin complex levels in patients with

inherited APC resistance due to factor V Leiden mutation. BritishJournal of Haematology, 92, 435±441.

Simioni, P., Prandoni, P., Lensing, A.W., Scudeller, A., Sardella, C.,

Prins, M.H., Villalta, S., Dazzi, F. & Girolami, A. (1997) The risk of

recurrent venous thromboembolism in patients with anArg506!Gln mutation in the gene for factor V (factor V Leiden).

New England Journal of Medicine, 336, 399±403.

Takahashi, H., Wada, K., Satoh, N., Takakuwa, E., Furuta, R.,Yoshino, N. & Shibata, A. (1993) Evaluation of oral anti-

coagulant therapy by measuring plasma prothrombin fragment 1

1 2. Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, 4, 435±439.

Talbot, S., Wakley, E.J. & Langman, M.J.S. (1972) A1, A2, B, and Oblood groups, Lewis blood groups and serum triglyceride and

cholesterol concentrations in patients with venous thromboem-

bolic disease. Lancet, 1152±1154.

Taube, J., McWilliam, N., Luddington, R., Byrne, C.D. & Baglin, T.(1999) Activated protein C resistance: effect of platelet activation,

platelet-derived microparticles and atherogenic lipoproteins.

Blood, 93, 3792±3797.Tosetto, A., Missiaglia, E., Gatto, E. & Rodeghiero, F. (1997) The

VITA project: phenotypic resistance to activated protein C and FV

Leiden mutation in the general population. Vicenza thrombophi-

lia and atherosclerosis. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 78, 859±863.

Tosetto, A., Castaman, G., Cappellari, A. & Rodeghiero, F. (2000)

The VITA Project: heritability of resistance to activated protein C.

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 84, 811±814.

van Baal, W.M., Emeis, J.J., van der Mooren, M.J., Kessel, H.,

Kenemans, P. & Stehouwer, C.D.A. (2000) Impaired procoagu-lant±anticoagulant balance during hormone replacement

therapy? A randomised, placebo-controlled 12 week study.

Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 83, 29±34.

Vandenbroucke, J.P. & Rosendaal, F.R. (1997) End of the line for

`third-generation-pill' controversy? Lancet, 349, 1113±1114.

Vandenbroucke, J.P., Rosing, J., Bloemenkamp, K.W.M., Middledorp,S., Helmerhorst, F.M., Bouma, B.N. & Rosendaal, F.R. (2001) Oral

contraceptives and the risk of venous thrombosis. New England

Journal of Medicine, 344, 1527±1535.

van der Bom, J.G., Bots, M.L., Haverkate, F., Slagboom, P.E., Meijer,

P., de Jong, P.T., Hofman, A., Grobbee, D.E. & Kluft, C. (1996)Reduced response to activated protein C is associated with

increased risk for cerebrovascular disease. Annals of Internal

Medicine, 125, 265±269.

van der Velde, W.J. & Treffers, P.E. (1985) Smoking in pregnancy:

the influence on percentile birth weight, mean birth weight,placental weight, menstrual age, perinatal mortality and

maternal diastolic blood pressure. Gynecology and Obstetric

Investigation, 19, 57±63.

van Hylckama Vlieg, A., van der Linden, I.K., Bertina, R.M. &Rosendaal, F.R. (2000) High levels of factor IX increase the risk of

venous thrombosis. Blood, 95, 3678±3682.

Varadi, K., Moritz, B., Lang, H., Bauer, K., Preston, E., Peake, I.,

Rivard, G.E., Keil, B. & Schwarz, H.P. (1995) A chromogenic

assay for activated protein C resistance. British Journal ofHaematology, 90, 884±891.

Williamson, D., Brown, K., Luddington, R., Baglin, C. & Baglin, T.

(1998) Factor V Cambridge: a new mutation (Arg306!Thr)

associated with resistance to activated protein C. Blood, 91,

1140±1144.

Winkler, U.H. (1998) Effects of hemostatic variables of desogestrel-and gestodene-containing oral contraceptives in comparison with

levonorgestrel-containing oral contraceptives: a review. American

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 179, 51S±61S.

Woodward, M., Lowe, J.D.O., Rumely, A., Tunstall-Pedoe, H.,

Philippou, H., Lane, D.A. & Morrison, C.E. (1997) Epidemiologyof coagulation factors, inhibitors and activation markers: the

third Glasgow MONICA survey. Relationship to cardiovascular

risk factors and prevalent cardiovascular disease. British Journal of

Haematology, 97, 785±797.

Keywords: activated protein C (APC) resistance, contra-ception, pregnancy, thrombosis.

q 2001 Blackwell Science Ltd, British Journal of Haematology 115: 767±773

Review 773