Upload
phillip-stewart
View
213
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE PESTICIDE REGISTRATION IMPROVEMENT EXTENSION ACT OF 2012
(PRIA 3)
Label Issue Resolution Period/Clean Labels
Presented at:
PRIA 3 WorkshopApril 10, 2013
ByLois Rossi
Director, Registration Division
2
New PRIA 3 Provision
Where a new AI, new use, new product or amended product application involves the Agency’s approval of a new or amended product label, new provisions in PRIA [Footnote in Tables 1-5, 7-10] require that:
Before the end of the action’s decision review time period, the
Agency will communicate to the registrant any label changes that are required for approval of that action;
The registrant can (a) agree to all of the changes, (b) request up to 30 days to resolve label differences, or (c) withdraw the application without prejudice;
The Agency has 2-business days to review and approve a revised label submitted by the registrant.
3
New PRIA 3 Provision – con’t These new provisions only apply to
conventional and antimicrobial pesticide actions submitted after October 1, 2012;
The Agency’s implementation process for these new provisions are depicted in the following flow-chart:
5
Resulting Process Improvements
Under PRIA 2 often not adequate time to discuss and resolve label issues before expiration of the PRIA Due Date leaving the applicant with a “take it or leave it” dilemma;
The Agency’s creation of the “Predecisional Determination Due Date” 2-4 weeks before the PRIA Due Date provides time to resolve label issues or negotiate a time extension to allow for the submission and review of additional data to address the label issues;
After the expiration of the PRIA Due Date, the applicant can also request up to 30 days to reach agreement on the label issues;
6
Resulting Process Improvements – con’t
Approving only clean labels relieves our state partners from the burden of reviewing each label to ensure that all of the Agency’s required changes have been incorporated;
Applicants also benefit from clean labels which reduces their uncertainty from differing state interpretations of EPA’s intended changes.