THE PEOPLE V THE OFFICERS: TREASON

8/9/2019 THE PEOPLE V THE OFFICERS: TREASON

1/47

NO.________________

IN THE

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

THE PEOPLEIncluding Susan Herbert, The US Military And The Employees of SCOTUS

V

BARACK OBAMAAnd The

Sitting Officers Of The US

Susan Herbert, pro se and pro bono1100 Seagate Avenue 101Neptune Beach, FL 32266

AFFIRMATION

TO THE HONORABLE JOHN ROBERTS, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME

COURT: Pursuant to Rules 22 and 23 of the Rules of this Court and 28 U.S.C.

1651(a) and 2101(f), Petitioners, The People, respectfully request a stay of

enforcement of the judgment below pending the disposition of a petition for a writ of

certiorari to the Supreme Court of the US as this then makes this case a case of

constitutional authority and original jurisdiction to be heard in person by the Supreme

Court of the US. This would also prevent the world court from adjudicating the

innocence or guilt of SCOTUS employees via a finding of fault as a world court

petition has already been filed. The decision below violates the entire Constitution

namely the very essence of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the

Fourteenth Amendment as well as the Declaration itself thus it violates the spirit of

our law absolutely and wholly; it violates The People. A stay pending this Courts

review of the substantial federal question/s present is essential to prevent Applicants

from suffering irreparable injury as a direct result of the wrongly decided point of law.

Petitioners or Applicants Susan Herbert acting on behalf of The People who gave

their consent, respectfully submits to this honorable court, having exhausted all

available remedies so that she became the very first citizen to exhaust the processentirely as proven by prior SCOTUS filings as she directly entered this court for the

first time since 1803 with Petition 08-6622 that there is no other jurisdictions available

to her to review. In her case as she is a woman she is a member of the class not yet

accorded equal protection of the law as the Executive is and has been exclusively

male and in her unique case she is the citizen who filed and pressed the case in the

name of The People against Barack Obama as he does not qualify under the terms

of The Constitution and the other candidates upon the Presidential ballot as they

1


2/47

lacked the human ability to keep The People safe, and later every sitting Officer thus

recently Barack Obama himself used a US Marshal to threaten her life directly also

threatening that she would be falsely imprisoned and even killed if she ever filed the

truth again in any federal court including US Supreme Court thus he then threatened

this court and its employees as well. Also: now that US Marshals life is at stake as is

the police officer witness as the false belief that Obama and the Officers possess isthat I can never, ever connect them to this crime if they murder the people who are

the chain of causation. The unjust persons involved truly believe you can murder the

truth if you murder the messenger when you cannot. The People then have no other

recourse. Petitioner Susan Herbert submits to this court that the very survival of the

Republic is at stake as Article 4 Section 4 has fallen save her one person and The

People who have joined the class. This matter reflects a vitally important issue of

public interest, Is the constitutionally set government The People or The Officers, and

presents a unique Constitutional question of first impression as to the final test of

Marbury as the refusal to deliver the paper commission itself a refusal to hear the

case in person that entered directly upon a violation of Marbury by this very Court -

has now become the violation of the right itself as it effectively removed The People

from the Constitution and replaced them with paper, law licenses and money, and it

also addresses the significance of the natural birth term as enumerated in Article 2,

Section 1 as a qualifier and qualifier for all who seek the office of the President of the

United States. Lastly it addresses a gross violation of separation of powers by the

sitting Officers as a two party monopoly arose that then allowed the very persons

seeking this office, Senators, to then Resolve to violate this term thus creating an

impossible Catch-22 legal situation for all harmed as this then would arise as a court

challenge via chain of command to the sitting President impossible as the verybeneficiaries of Res. 511 now sit. All of these actions target women and the ethical

and targeted me specifically and exactly as I am unique: Im the proof. A stay is also

consistent with this Courts decision to obey an Executive Order issued by my person

in Petition 07-9804 thus I already moved the Court equaling myself to any lawyer,

any Officer, any SCOTUS clerk and any Justice. The Court may treat this application

as a petition for a writ of certiorari and precedent to do so was established by Bush V

Gore and Donofrio V Wells. Extraordinary circumstances exist, including a Resolution

made by the state of GA that charges 5 Justices of the Supreme Court are guilty of

treason and which The People now truly believe to be fact and law due to Barack

Obamas recent attack upon the Supreme Court and BVG. I, Susan Herbert, possess

no conflicting interests. See, BVG, 2000 e.g., Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 887

(1983); Nebraska Press Assn v.Stuart, 423 U.S. 1011, 423 U.S. 1027 (1975);

Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 400 U.S. 939 (1970), 401 U.S. 402,

406 (1971)

2


3/47

Opinions

The opinions of the Northern District of Iowa which ignored all fact and law plus all

US case law are attached. The most recent ruling is an actual judgment in a civil case

that strikes The People from The Constitution; no US attorneys were present nor was

I or any other person. It constitues a court of admiralty, a civil conviction without anytrial or jury and this is one of the unjust actions our Founders meant to end with our

Revolution and founding as a government of People not titles. The Seventh

Amendments original intent was to ensure trial by jury and Gideon was meant to

ensure a defense if any criminal charge is pressed against you. The date of this

judgment is very telling: March 22, 2010: The day after Obamacare was

unconstitutionally and even criminally forced upon The People. This is not an

accident or a mistake; it was deliberate and I can and will prove it. This is significant

in light of the facts of my case which is then The Peoples case. Other opinions are

the opinions of this very court, Petitions 07-9804, 08-6622 and 09-6777 as they

denied The People standing by denying their humanity thus erroneously not wrongly

awarded power and authority to titles, lawyers and money.

Relief Requested

A gag order against Barack Obama and the sitting Officers as a clear and present

danger exists a facist government now sits thus the form is changed to that other

than a constitutional Republic as Obama is not natural born and as I can and will

prove a plot existed ot then replace The People thus the Republic with money in

various forms like law licesens thus the wealthy as the power and authority - and ahearing in person before the Supreme Court to then adjudicate the paper commission

itself thus informing The People and forcing delivery of the actual paper, a SCOTUS

ruling for The People and for Susan Herbert plus the delivery of the founding

documents to The People espcicially women thus equality is achieved and SCOTUS

is made a lawful institution as Marbury is proven to be law while our founding

documents are proven to be elegant. The Founders experiment has ended; it did so

at BVG and so We are the proof the Founders said would one day exist as I, Susan,

rose to the level of proof by engaging this very Court and so successfully moving this

Court with an Executive Order thus usccessfully defending The People. Contrary to

what the Officers believe and contrary to what some of The People believe the

Republic did not fall as I assumed the risk and so floated our living government until I

could return in defense of The People as this lawsuit ripened when Obama directly

injured the People during the State of the Union Address and then when he then

directly threatened me on or around February 14 th, 2010 when I served him and all in

his employ notice. I also ask that my name be placed on the 2012 ballot for President

and my solutions as to how the injury stopped or rather chain of causation can be

3


4/47

seevred and then the damage healed be considered even if they are unique as if you

have not discovered the naswer yet in over 200 years than maybe I have as I have

proved ability and capability by acting to fulfill the oath of office thus proving our one

vote makes every person a power of one so noe The People must test and prove

their own persons. My solution makes it possible for any person to secure a plce on

the ballot, any ballot.

Statement of Facts/Legal Argument

I have totally exhausted the process thus I am a first in US history. I was born into

injury and harm in December of 1967. In 2005 I finally exhausted the process in three

states: FL, PA and NY. My case left FL; it traveled in and out of several states. In PA

I invoked Marbury, forcing PA top uphold the law on behalf of women. PA refused

and acted upon unconstitutional policy targeting women and their children to then

keep my children from me and later to award the case to NY in spite of contract law.

It landed in NY in 1998 and went to PA; NY then criminally claimed jurisdiction over

again in 2001 solely to then make what was and is a kidnapping and the human

trafficking of my person and my children legal by upholding it with falsified and paid

for court orders. In NY and indeed in every state this corruption was endemic but in

NY it is criminal: Lawyers were allowed to enter filings when I did not want or need

representation and when I fired counsel; these filings contained lies and fabrications.

The NY Appellate then issued a ruling and order in which the Bill of Rights was

violated. I myself went back over the evidence and was able to prove graft, corruption

and bribery; it is a proven, known fact that every other NY Appellate has been caught

committing crimes in custody cases and then I, myself proved the only Appellate notyet caught was engaged in the very same activity. Because an overwhelming male

majority exits and has existed since our founding and because women have never

receive equal protection of the law and because of the rise of the undue influence of

privateers and a protected class, politicians and lawyers, and because Marbury has

never been tested, I found not one authority was willing to obey the law in my case.

This meant that this corruption had to extend into SCOTUS due to BVG. I worked my

way up chain of command finally landing at SCOTUS; in this case you may enter

SCOTUS as a right or else the denial of hearing in person then becomes the violation

of the right itself as it makes the Officers the constitutionally set government thus no

power and no authority would belong to The People.

I secured this as a right by first contacting SCOTUS in February of 2007 and arguing

US case law and then contacting the US Military who informed me that they would

honor my legal standing if I lived it out by acting to enter SCOTUS and so standing

down the Chief Justice and/or sitting President in person in a court of law. At that

moment this case then revolved around testing Marbury V Madison as exactly like

4


5/47

Jefferson predicted an oligarchy had arisen. If all courts have been exhausted and

not one authority is willing to obey and enforce the law on behalf of women thus The

People then the only court left is SCOTUS thus The People as they must be granted

informed consent. Upon Petition 07-9804 being denied Marbury itself is violated so I

petitioned again, 08-6622, and entered directly. I entered no lower court at all. Upon

direct entry hearing in person is then the only remedy and relief or else SCOTUS iscriminalized as the lower courts now are or else no BVG and no violation of the

natural birth term. Lawyer then becomes privileged class with rights and honors no

other persons have thus we are now a dead institution. The Officers of the US never

responded to 08-6622 thus proving my case for me - not against SCOTUS but for

SCOTUS and for The People. However on 11/20/08 upon being informed that the

Officers defaulted SCOTUS employees then injured their own person by acting to file

the case for conference but not filing the emergency stay and instead returning it to

me. As one ethical clerk then acted to protect all clerks and Justices thus The People

I realized I might be facing another problem: If the clerks and Justices are not aware

of an injury they suffered and may have suffered from this injury back to antiquity, the

dawn of patriarchy, but that was only realized in the US at BVG then they may not

know of their own injury as it is about self-awareness. As Im the very first citizen to

test Marbury and I am a nonlawyer and woman they might not know something. I

then accessed the Federal Appellate, the only court that I never entered, to prove to

the clerks and Justices that not one Officer was willing to enforce the law and would

willingly harm themselves rather than rule against the sitting Officers. I returned to

SCOTUS with Petition 09-6777 and found SCOTUS was still not aware of the injury:

A fascist regime had now risen as I was not accorded my protected rights in

2007/2008 when I first exhausted the process as I placed my knowledge of BVG onthe court record in 2000, in a Philadelphia County Court, as every right had been

violated then as my sons were injured before they were born and I was born into

harm and later one of my sons retained his legal status as an unborn person. The

case for equality is the case for all human beings not only women; are SCOTUS

employees of The People? Does SCOTUS answer to The People?Upon exhausting

SCOTUS once more thus justice is made impossible for The People or for SCOTUS

employees themselves an event transpired: conditions changed as the Nobel was

erroneously awarded to Obama, the second erroneous award to an American as the

Nobel committee had to violate its own rules and as climategate is now exposed:

Scientists were caught changing numbers and skewing evidence to then force their

political agenda upon us. No reputable scientist supports any of this activity and

many have called for these persons to be prosecuted and it irreparably harms good

science. See 07-9804 as I named the Nobels and their original intent; in my now filed

world court petition I offered to give Norway thus the planet my knowledge regarding

nuclear physics, when life begins in the womb and systems of elegant government

and law.

5


6/47

I knew that the rise of fascism which I first witnessed in 2004 at a political rally was

here; that it had indeed spread into and was now consuming the Office of the

Executive, that I might be the only one who knows and that I would learn how Hitler

broke the will of the individual as Hitler is an idea and a plan of action not one

person. I could not know iffascism and treason infiltrated SCOTUS until or unless Iengaged SCOTUS directly; BVG may have been our saving grace as I know the

good math and all of the correct application no other American not even a trained

lawyer knew. I could predict: As it injured the clerks and targeted them as lawyers the

injury stops at the clerks; only some might be injured to a point of incapacitation and

if they have only harmed lawyers then Im the test thus Im the proof as the only

paper I have is what I create and enter to SCOTUS so the docket them will become

my law license. I could predict once I did make it to the case conferencing list with

07-9804: Barack Obama will have to directly confront SCOTUS and attack my person

due to my actions all meant to drive him into international waters as he is not natural

born and is a criminal (he threatened me directly thus I own this knowledge this is

now criminal as Im the victim) thus I would have to allow SCOTUS to violate my

rights once again and then attack Obama from within world court; upon him acting to

injure SCOTUS and upon him attacking me directly? If I could secure proof of life

from him; as that is chain of command theory then I would be back at SCOTUS thus

here I am, again. An odyssey begun over three years ago to test the law absolutely

and wholly and to test Marbury is now at its end; if this case is not heard in person

and The People are not informed then they cannot and will not give informed consent

thus cannot stop fascism nor fulfill the oath of office; they have no means to protect

and defend their own persons nor will it exist in the future.

In this case the three branches of government and the Officers thereof have violated

every word and clause of US law including the entire Bill of Rights via use of courts of

admiralty, unconstitutional acts and police power or fear, intimidation and threats

along with endemic violence; women receive no protection of the law thus are subject

to the whim and will of the individual thus are subjected to mass violence unless they

agree to become the willing victims of the Officers and of unconstitutional policy; the

Officers then violated every single solitary US case law I cited including the one case

I waited to cite as it serves as proof of life: Gideon, as the only way to convict me

thus falsely imprison me and/or kill me is to commit premeditated, 1st degree murder

and/or violate Gideon which Obama would have to do himself as we would then be

past Marbury only he would have to do it in secret thus could and would manipulate

a US Marshal or other federal agent. The threat was made against my person in the

form of a US Marshal; I know this order came directly from Obama due to my own

actions, prior action of SCOTUS, chain of command theory and the complex

6


7/47

concepts of law and its application the US Marshal was citing which he could not

know otherwise; it was not humanly possible for him to know and I will prove it.

Not one sitting Officer is willing to obey and enforce the law as to do so would mean

that they, Officers, would on longer be a privileged class. Currently they hide behind

their ability to access SCOTUS or to deny The People access to SCOTUS as onAmerican citizen has yet risen to power on their own, without money, without a

lawyer and without the help of a political party, until I did it. I deliberately, knowingly

and willingly plotted and conspired to be able to prevent these unjust persons from

overthrowing The People when this time arrived; I forced the Federal Judiciary to

issue a paper ruling which strikes The People form the Constitution and replaces The

People with paperwork and money. I entered SCOTUS first in 2007 asking the

natural birth question and asking if it constitutes treason to organize and collect

money with for the sole intent of overthrowing The People via foreingization.

I knew I could and would represent the class as I owned unique knowledge of the

US, the injury, systems of government, systems of currency, Native America,

theology, chain of command theory, the US Military, women, pregnancy and

childbirth and then the world itself. You need not hold a law license if you are the only

person to be of the ability to sue in defense of the class, The People. If I am the

victim and so are The People as a whole class and then I know and we know if a

crime has been committed but I alone can and will prove it conclusively as I resolved

Uniformity and made the case for equality and in so doing became this nations Chief

Law Enforcement officer via my actions as I needed no crutch and so no paper:

There are cases in which no existing writ covers the point of law such as an authority

case that is pro se; the closet precedent is Marbury and BVG in which the emergency

stay was granted hence paving the way for Certiorari but in the case of BVG? The

lawyers brought a fictitious case forward thus committed what constitutes treason as

they exploited their knowledge of the law and the process. As no pro se petitioner

who is not a lawyer has been allowed to argue before SCOTUS in person? It makes

justice impossible for The People as BVG then made all lawyers bereft of any legal

standing in the case of the natural birth clause. This is the test of Marbury V Madison

and also the test of our form of government; it proves the form the US is as a

Republic of living People under a Declaration and Constitution is elegant. It also

answers whether or not SCOTUS Justices can be guilty of treason or not as all law

arises form the will of The People thus SCOTUS Justices and Presidents arise from

The People. It proves life not paper is the proof in any constitutional Republic and

that all power and authority belongs to The People not any Officer or group of

Officers as the legal presumption is ignorance is not an excuse under the law. Finally

it asks and answers if The People ever had an actual opportunity to govern

7


8/47

themselves as humans are not equal under our law although the document, the

paper, says that they are equal. Does paper prove itself or do we prove the paper?

As I exhausted both chains of command I then will be arguing or adjudicating

proving - both founding governing documents, the originals not the 1871 version of

our constitution as that was no longer valid once the Officers defaulted on 11/05/08.

As I have proven over and over that I am this nations smartest living person, that I

possess the most intelligence thus I myself am the proof that the discrimination of

women is reality then denying me entry to any court of law in person to adjudicate the

natural birth clause constitutes unique discrimination of my person. Olech V

Willowbrook clearly states that I may be a class of one; in this case I am a class of

one who then represents the class of many. I am the living embodiment of the law

then I will make constitutional I am statements not third person statements. My legal

arguments therefore are one legal argument: I am a declaration and constitution; I

am a power of one, a person with the power and authority to issue an Executive

Order.

Judicial review is the myth of fingerprints. Paper proves nothing for The People live to

prove the theories contained upon the paper are law or not. We prove if the Supreme

Court has hit upon the correction application of the law by living out its rulings thus

conducting the experiment. Words and actions are empty devoid of proof of life:

whose person matches the Declaration and Constitution and whos does not? Who

secures and engenders liberty thus acts for The People as the living embodiment of

the Constitution while who denies liberty to all but the Officers?

Barack Obama is not natural born and he knew he did not qualify for the Office but

sought it regardless for selfish, self-serving interests.He set out to violate the rights

of all natural born persons targeting women. He fully understood that he was

committing a crime but was assured that not one person could or would prosecute

him and that even if a person did enter SCOTUS that he could then send an attorney

to represent his person. I ran Obama and his cronies through their places defeating

them each time until we came to the end in Sioux City Iowa. This included all of the

ex-Clintonites he immediately installed upon buying the seat but making it seem as if

he was legally elected thus going back upon every promise he ever made and

exposing himself for what he is, a fascist. He is delusional as he was raised to

believe that he is the exception to the rules and the law, always changing who he is

so that he could conform. He believes his own greatness when not one person can

point to anything he ever did on his own without a favor or a hand up; Obama never

earned any privilege or honor he was subsequently awarded. Obama presents empty

titles like President of Harvard Law Review as proof when Harvard cannot tell us

what that is and means and what Obama ever actually did on his own while there.

8


9/47

Students he had cannot tell us a thing he taught them and classmates cannot tell you

they even remember him. Nobody recalls his birth. His record of achievement? It is

nonexistent. My service record is my life; if Obama truly believes proof is paper then

why wont he produce the paper? The People gave Obama several opportunities to

produce the paper while I gave him at least half a dozen: he could produce a long

form birth certificate or a SCOTUS answer, as he must answer a case ofconstitutional authority entered against him. He and his lawyers never counted upon

this application of Marbury V Madison as they forgot: Marbury the man confronted

Madison not Jefferson over capacity, duty or must, and then legality or may! It

rose to Jefferson via chain of command that Madison never had to obey; Marshall

answered if James Madison as Secretary of State or if any person any voter - was

compelled to obey any single order of any commanding officer. As I did it first and as

the only precedent is Marbury then he mustanswer; he failed as he is one of the

Officers who defaulted on 11/05/08 and as all you may not do is fail to make an

attempt and Obama made no attempt at all in any form to answer my suit; even bob

Bauer, Obamas lawyer of record, has never once contacted me when he did contact

all other petitioners seeking to adjudicate this point of law.

Upon my last notice in federal court that also went after and convicted Bauer and

then his entire law firm who has interests in Laos among other foreign nations a US

Marshal came to my home and told me to my face that they the US government

had targeted me and that if I made any attempt to tell anyone the truth that I would be

criminally charged but w/o any trial and so falsely imprisoned; that I would be denied

any defense. This Marshal described various scenarios as if he had been told what

will happen and he finally told me that Gideon would be violated and that JohnRoberts thus The People would be thrown to the lions. He used different words; he

did not realize he was describing various violations of US common law, the Bill of

Rights and several US cases like Gideon, and that these violations had to take

certain forms like a court of Admiralty. As I have been directly engaging Obama and

his cronies since 1996 I always knew where this would end as all I ever had to do to

act in defense of myself thus The People and the employees of SCOTUS was to

enter SCOTUS directly upon an Executive Order thus make it to the case conference

list as then all Americans would be informed and whoever rose to power criminally,

either Bush Jr. or Obama or McCain or even Ralph Nader, would be removed -

eventually. I knew I would someday position myself in a kill or be killed stand off and

that The People would win the day so that The Republic would not fall. To force this

stand off I engaged SCOTUS and the other federal judiciary now endemically

corrupted and even criminal itself. I forced situation upon situation constantly

leveraging power and authority back and forth until I was at my end with Obama: I

dealt the final blow in Sioux City Iowa; I made it permanent by then filing in world

court; upon receiving the paper judgment from Sioux City I am back at SCOTUS as

9


10/47

the US Marshal told me that The People would be stricken from the Constitution and

they were: The Sioux City Iowa judgment reads that The People are to be

stricken from The Constitution and replaced with paper namely money.

I can and will prove a concerted effort to own The People thus change our form of

government has existed since 1871 but that it was only realized with Bill Clinton andObama; I can and will prove absolutely as early as October of 2005 Obama and

Biden were positioning themselves to secure the Office via purchase and

propaganda but unfortunately for all unjust persons I am Susan of In Re Susan

Herbert and of Susan Herbert V Barack Obama, SCOTUS, and upon first hearing

Marbury was violated and upon second hearing? A response was due on November

5th, 2008 and no response came; as of Friday, November 7th, 2008 there was still no

response thus the US, the Officers, have defaulted. The violation of Marbury and

failure to respond by the US is then an automatic judgment of default for The People.

This then led me to then be forced to appear in local district family court, Rennselaer

County, NY, on October 24th, 2008 in the state and in the exact court with the exact

persons that violated me wholly and absolutely and upon the same claim now before

US Supreme Court. This local district family court action was filed within my 25 day

window to petition to be reheard and it was then held even after the US Supreme

Court acted to address the violation of Marbury by re-docketing my case. As the

plaintiffs and the FAMILY COURT judge as family court is the most fundamental

court cited my human ability to enter the Supreme Court and the Court itself for

refusing to accord me any and all remedy and relief thus deny my humanity in

defense of me naming my commission then they too named failure to deliver the

paper commission as the REASON to violate my rights and my childrens rights sothen the Officers of the US are at fault for my injuries and now The Peoples injuries.

These injuries are unending and ceaseless until addressed:

The clerks and Justices of the Supreme Court do not know they themselves are the

target of a crime; that the fascist regime now seated was put in play expressly to

defeat SCOTUS thus shatter the faith of The People and so break their will. As

persons with socialist agendas could not get their way time and time again they

enacted a new plan: Instead of voting for any one party they began encouraging

unjust people to look for a personality type to then elect as President. At a Harvard

lecture that was more political rally than lecture Bill Clinton was mentioned as a

young hopeful out of Arkansas. I entered this eyewitness statement to federal court.

Later the very persons with the socialist agenda, the wealthy and actual foreigners,

basically anointed Bill Clinton at the annual meeting of the Bilderberger group. No

American except those in Arkansas had ever heard of Clinton and yet he was then

placed upon the Presidential ballot. We know who and what Clinton is. Next came

John Kerry with all of the same character defects and worse. And now we have

10


11/47

Obama, a lawyer exploiting his knowledge of the law and when he knows he is not

natural born and not a victim but uses propaganda to convince others that he is. His

thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs are alien to our Constitution. These people are

liars; they are manipulators and predators. These people rule via power and control

and to elect a person with these defects then allows those who bought him the Office

the ability to control him thus wield the legal power of the Executive but from behindthe scenes. It is a cabal, exactly like the Nazi regime was. It is meant to enslave The

People.

No matter what you say to these people or how you say it they are thoroughly

convinced that socialism will work in the US when socialism will never work in the US

as it will always be realized as fascism not socialism. Call it Fabian socialism; call it

whatever you wish as due to our system of government it will be realized as fascism.

Some of these people openly advertise that their prize, the ultimate prize, is control of

US and to do that you then need to control The People as the government is The

People. Thus you end up with politicians and businessmen who are Marxists and

their Nazi-like enforcers those who have badges and guns - who pit The People

against they the US government as if we are enemies. Everybody knows Obama is

a socialist and is not natural born; why do federal agents like the Secret Service then

protect him? Two Secret Service agents told me why: They insist that unless the

Supreme Court hears the case then they have no choice. Every agency told me why:

They are waiting for the Supreme Court to adjudicate the delivery of the paper

commission as failure to deliver a ruling upon natural birth is now the violation of the

right thus press the final test of Marbury, the very test I began. As the Supreme Court

did not know it had been targeted? The clerks and Justices found themselves in aposition in which they too had their rights violated.

I, Susan, forced the clerks and Justices to violate me thus deny themselves delivery

of the paper commission to then force Obama into international waters. As People

who are black and people who are incapacitated by the injury known as the domestic

violence named in Article 4 section 4 and as the employees of SCOTUS had a pre-

existing injury they did not know of I then had to do this to then get Obama, the

lawyer, before John Roberts that exact person but not inside SCOTUS as Obama

knows he can never go there ever thus I knew that he would have to fabricate the

venue a la Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill. To topple SCOTUS he would have to do it

publicly thus hold a criminal trial before The People; it would have to be a civil

conviction that is wholly unjust; he would have to indoctrinate The People thus make

them believe the Justices are guilty while he is not. By running him into international

waters the whole world gets a good look at the truth as his own words and actions he

himself will then be the proof The People need to know he is not natural born and not

a Constitutionalist as fact and law. I have already filed in world court to then prevent

11


12/47

any of these people from escaping to another country as actual Nazi war criminals

once did; I made certain they would find no safe harbor so that their only safety rests

in telling the truth to The People. Also I will then give The People the only criminal

trial they might ever receive as SCOTUS is not a criminal court, as we do not press

charges of treason against foreigners and as we do pres charges of high treason

against those who act against the Crown which Obama did. So I deliberately, willinglyand knowingly did all I did; in Sioux City I made certain to let Obama know his

biggest fear is military custody thus he would have to pit the People with the Chief

Justice against the military via Congress. Congress would be the fabricated venue.

See my prior petitions as I named the Congress influence over the military via

allocation of funds as destructive. I named Eisenhowers military-industrial complex

realized as ALL military contracts are politically motivated today and the US Military

falsely believes it has to appease the sitting Officers of Congress.

I lied in wait. I lied in self-defense as the biggest fear Obama has is not US Military

custody but British Military custody as both he and Joe Biden acted against the

Crown Kraft just bought Cadbury which should be impossible if the US were yet a

Republic not fascist and Biden openly admitted he plagiarized a British speech but

never suffered the consequences and now the British People are forced to suffer this

insult. Biden used that property to then harm the US and British People but yet he is

not on any US Marshals watch list as there is no outstanding warrant against him;

another American who did the very same thing is so as Biden was granted favored

status he has been made an expectation to the law like every other politician criminal

I know a privileged class has risen - as no judge would allow any citizen to

prosecute Biden not even civilly. The People have been denied entry to the courts asthe Republic fell. I proved this is now a done deal; it is endemic as I exhausted the

entire Judiciary branch thus only SCOTUS is left because:

The unjust persons colluding and conspiring against us did not count upon Bush V

Gore, a separate crime itself, thus did not count upon the Justices ruling in such a

way it left the door open for any citizen to then press suit to assume the Office if they

had pure and absolute standing nor did they count upon I, Susan, as they do not truly

believe in US law or ideals thus never imagined that a lone voter could rise to power

via equal protection and due process. They did not believe a woman could defeat

them nor did they believe anyone could become President and Commander in the

US; that all you needed was your one vote. For years and years they have been lying

to us claiming that any person at all could ascend to this office when they knew they

had made it impossible but BVG and my injury changed that. They refused to believe

in the vote as they do not believe in The People or that the vote leveled the playing

field. The other thing they did not believe? That clerks would act ethically thus when

they denied the clerks their right of equal protection and due process in BVG by filing

12


13/47

as an emergency stay thus circumventing the clerks they assumed they had broken

the clerks. They, like the puppet they support, Obama, are afraid of the clerks in that

they might be as intelligent as they but act ethically? They assumed that no clerk

ever would or else Obama would have been stopped by adjudication of the natural

birth clause. Obama and his cabal knew my case is the case that defeats them thus

they assumed as I had not proceeded that it had to be the clerks. The People took onthis belief and later The People began to believe the Justices were and are actively

protecting Obama. I letObama and all of the unjust persons around him believe that

and even used it against them. As their game is placing blame as that is what all

domestic violence is I engineered a case in which I pitted the clerks against each

other to bring the injury current so that the clerks might then be aware of it and then I

pitted the clerks against the Justices to do the very same thing, make the injury

current. Im the constant and I own the knowledge so I had to do this to then define

the depth and magnitude of the injury. I was creating the record thus proving it was

not the clerks or Justices no matter their actions but the crime the clerks and Justices

were not aware of then affecting them and in so doing leveling the playing filed in

such a way it became a stand off between my person, John Roberts and Obama.

Proof is: Millions of Americans are behind me. After the State of the Union Address

some of these people began calling me and writing to me in anger. They insisted:

The clerks are guilty! The Justices are guilty! They know!I said they do not know as I

have not old them something yet. They responded: They know; we have a videotape

of Orly Taitz confronting John Roberts and being told his clerks are guilty. I asked:

and what did he say? Nothing. I said, Exactly! If you are a lawyer and you walk up to

John Roberts who is CHIEF JUSTICE and tell him that his clerks are guilty then hedsay nothing as if that is the case then hed be the first to know as thats chain of

command theory. They cut me off: THEY KNOW AS THEY ALL SEE AND HEAR

OBAMA! OBAMA IS THE PROOF! If the clerks werent guilty then Obama would not

sit. American People: Yes he would as 1, Only I have the whole case as only I cut

Obama and Bauer off at the pass, Petition 07-9804, and as 2, The clerks never got

Bush V Gore; the LAWYERS WHO ARE GUILTY brought it in as an emergency stay

to circumvent the clerks thus deny them their rights and obstruct justice. As the only

lawyers in the US who had standing to sue for third party standing are the clerks of

SCOTUS most or all of whom are licensed lawyers and as the only men in the US

who had standing to sue are those same clerks then the SCOTUS clerks were

denied delivery of the paper commission, the suit known as Bush V Gore. If they

handled it they probably would have caught it thus returned it to the bush and gore

lawyers unfiled as it is fiction and as it denied all of us equal protection and due

process unless Bush and Gore stand thus argue pro se or they could have

deliberately injured those lawyers forcing a suit against a single clerk; the clerk

himself then answers as a pro se case of constitutional authority and original

13


14/47

jurisdiction testing Marbury V Madison thus making himself legal: The Supreme court

is made law but enshrined or ensconced in a ruling issued by the Chief Justice not

the constitution thus it answers to The People and so pro se cases then proceed thus

lawyer is on longer a protected, honored, privileged class so his own job is secure

and heascends to the Office of the Executive.

When the clerks rights were violated The Peoples were, Justices and clerks being

People, and lawyers did it and are still doing it as I told Taitz and several others that

chain of command is a clerk can do anything to you and it is not a crime unless you

enter SCOTUS itself, say it to their face and prove motivation and intention. No

matter what a clerk does if he pits himself against you then it is constitutional

authority not a crime unless you prove motivation and intention and if you are a

lawyer? You can NEVER prove that as criminal since Bush V Gore was heard and

until Susan V Obama is heard and I, Susan, can prove it is not criminal: I forced this

on purpose, with full knowing and willingness, thus anything that happened to me

even 11/20/08? I meant for it to happen. I crated the parameters making it best or

worst case scenario then argued it both ways plotting who did what to whom and

when knowing that it could not be the clerks fault as one crime was already in

progress when another came at them. At the point of intersection when the clerks

were denied handling Bush V Gore as an appeal from the FL courts, Gore V FL, they

lost the human ability to do anything else but did not know it. Clerks: I know you truly

believe you were choosing your actions in my case but you were not as each time

you or a Justice or both could not know something that I could not yet tell you as no

record existed and as life is proof. As long as I always found at least one willing

person then even if it seems as if some clerks injured another that is not the truth asuntil my person, Roberts and Obama were equalized nothing else was ever going to

transpire as its physics. As long as I never veered from my course I could prove any

and every action was not criminal, it was not wrong, and actions like 11/20/08

actually helped me thus helped The People as they led Obama to believe he is

invincible thus expediting this case: you have to crash and burn before you rise; I

forced us to crash sooner before physical violence erupted - rather than fall into

WWIII. That EXACTLY as Hitler rose he then rose and exactly as Europe lauded

Hitler he was being lauded. I mistakenly thought I had every answer until the Nobel

Prizes were announced. When even Obamas closest associates were floored that

Obama now truly believed his own delusion, Obama truly believed that he had ability

and capacity he never had but was flattered into believing he had, I realized I did not

have a few answers such as If I know how they make the will of the individual

become the will of the crowd, do I know how they then make the liberty of the

individual become indifferent? and How did Germany keep ethical Germans inside

its borders so that they could not escape and tell the world? I did not. And: What

14


15/47

does Norway not know as it has awarded two Nobels, Gore and Obama, in errorand

against their own rules?

I originally phoned my case in as I argued US case law with a SCOTUS clerk named

Will or so he said. I NEEDED to hear his truth, as I know the Constitutions truth as I

lived the case. He told me the truth. Thus I had an injury I could cite against SCOTUSbut then I had to define the parameters to know if it was with motive and intention. I

next called the Military; the Military told me that it would recognize me as the

constitutionally set Commander if I could secure the paper from SCOTUS. Thats not

legal in the US you need no paper - but then that made it a case of adjudicating the

paper commission thus testing Marbury. I made an attempt to tell the clerks that I

needed to place blame back and forth to then define the parameters and to discover

if the Federal Judiciary was endemically corrupted and maybe criminal but I may

have failed, as I could not tell them they were injured yet. I soon realized that I

would have to let the injury happen and then I might have to let it escalate to a

Justice due to the process and the process was an issue due to no nonlawyer

arguing before SCOTUS thus paper came to replace People as the government and

as due process itself was denied the clerks. I knew the clerks did not know of their

injury when a lawyer reported that William Suter had taken a vote upon which writ to

issue, as in which to apply for and so ask for. This lawyer said that Suter told him no

writ existed so it is impossible. Correct as this lawyer wanted a writ to then defend

several dead institutions: his license, his law firm, his partners dead name, his

partners dead body and then the law itself the pieces of paper. He had a living

victim but she was his last concern or so I read thus he made it sound as if Suter

actually took a live vote while he was o on the phone waiting. As it did not occur toSuter to force the test of Marbury I knew that the clerks did not know and perhaps

could not know. I tried to provoke him into knowing by telling him: William Suter, are

you the same Will I spoke to? That Will tried to deny me paper when nobody needs a

writ or the rules. The Chief Clerk does not take popular votes!I could not outright tell

him what I knew or else he would not have insight; he had to have the life experience

of me first that he was denied in BVG. Susan would have told this lawyer, if he ever

told Suter his real reasons thus all of his fact, that No, YOU cant have one. YOU

alone may not have a writ. YOU cant file that case. YOU are the reason. Hopefully

he would realize that he had TWO clients, his client whose name is on the paper and

then himself, people not paper. Paper is a holdover from our days as a British colony.

So is the bar, the British accreditation registry. Id make him sue me, a clerk or the

Chief Clerk, to test Marbury thus prove our law is elegant as: first one back to the bar

wins! If it is the American bar, our Declaration and Constitution plus US case law

and so American common law then we are elegant but if it is not if SCOTUS has

overthrown The People or if a sitting President has - then it is then the Founders

experiment has failed as the Founders said all you NEEDED is one vote.

15


16/47

Constitutional authority means you never need to cast an actual vote if you own the

knowledge as your action or life then is the proof. The proof that BVG, Bushs

installation is Commander, is not legal? 9/11 and the bad declaration of war thus the

war itself as the 9/11 hijackers are Saudis and as I know why it is unconstitutional to

assassinate a foreign leader thus I could have removed Hussein w/o any legal

problem and w/o a war.

As I forced the action on 11/20/08 thus knew it could be either/or but that it was not

guilty I then argued it both ways; I argued it to then gain leverage until I had the

proof. In my world court petition you read that I am arguing for or against, I often say

guilty or innocent as I had to do that until I had the proof some of which is proof of

life so I had to secure it myself. If I named both extremes, guilty or not, then I could

prove intention and motivation as we lived history and Im the constant. For instance:

A piece of evidence rising to proof that clerk Clayton Higgins sent me now

exonerates the clerks but in my world court petition as I had not received the Sioux

City judgment it reads that it proves guilt. Later I used it to fool lawyers bent upon

escaping the consequences of their actions. I forced the case to force my own case

as my children and I, The People, are incessantly abused thus I myself volunteered

to suffer some injury but now Obama himself is doing it to me directly and I never

volunteered to suffer at his hands.

I came to know lawyers are at fault as they have injured The People grossly, by

grossly violating the separation of powers and via exploiting expert knowledge plus

they make up almost all judicial seats and craft all law acts, Executive Orders and

signing statements - so we now have a system of lawyers protecting lawyers. NoPresident has fully understood what he is or is not signing in decades and Congress

does whatever it wants to do thus no checks and balances exist anymore. Eventually

lawyers played their game so many times in courts that even other federal judges

were engaged in actively committing crimes from the bench against the pro se. They

conditioned themselves by reading documents in the third person but never in the

first thus first person pronouns confused them and caused them to deny reality. By

the time I came along? Judges got a shock as I know US law and case law; I know

application. I entered an airtight case and had an answer for every excuse they made

to keep me out unconstitutionally. In my case it was criminal very early on as a judge,

fully aware I had a case of original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court, sent discovery

papers to my house thus acknowledging my case had merit but not realizing: This

judge asked me to issue a motion of discovery against the Justices and clerks thus

The People to then produce: The original Declaration and Constitution. As this judge

and I know the truth of what he did as there are hidden facts known only to us he

made what was not personal then personal due to secure communication meant only

to protect and defend The People especially those who are defenseless I then moved

16


17/47

on to SCOTUS all by myself as judges were now creating an impossible Catch-22

situation by openly stating that they would not hear the case because the Supreme

Court would not or never had yet but that they would not send your case ahead. I

entered my own ruling and one other; there are hundreds and may be even

thousands but this one names thus exactly blames SCOTUS: SCOTUS may not

make lawyer an honored and privileged class and neither may other lawyers aseventually it will harm SCOTUS thus The People. It did. But before it harmed

SCOTUS? It harmed the US Military, also of The People.

At Petition 09-6777 in November/December 2009 I had to collect more evidence

rising to proof and then go back to Sioux City Iowa as I named it as the one and only

ethical federal court I came across at all in America and so Obama then announced

he was restructuring the federal court system beginning with: Sioux City Iowa. As

Obama and Bauer and every crony knew I was the enemy who could deliver a fatal

blow to them I played them like puppets but they did not know it. They truly believe

Im their slave but Im their slave master. Id write something and enter it and they

react. See my prior complaints and petitions as I wrote federal judges use my

complaints like they are instruction booklets in how to harm Susan. I crafted the

recent Sioux City complaint to then end this as at Bush V Gore this game of chess

was over. As US law is elegant all you had to do was know to enter an authority

case; that is then like a super magical square on a chessboard. Ben Franklin found a

super magical square. The knight lands on one square each time eventually leaving

the chess board where he began thus I would make my last move first; I would enter

and exit upon the same square: The Supreme Court as an authority case of original

jurisdiction as once Obama publicly accused and tried and convicted the Justices oftreason and came to have Americans come to truly believe it? As if it really is as fact

and law? I had him, as that would be Obama arguing against the constitution and

against the equal protection and due process clauses. If the Justices are guilty of

treason then the clerks are thus where do you go to adjudicate this? SCOTUS as that

then makes me the defense attorney for The People and the clerks and Justices of

SCOTUS. As Im the only person in the world who can represent the class then I or

We may proceed. I had to wait upon one last thing: The paper ruling from Sioux City

as the Marshal said it would strike The People from the Constitution thus would serve

as Obamas written confession for The People as he tried the Justices but denied

them any defense so that The People would be denied any defense and we were: If

you look the Sioux City ruling is also a judgment; the judge who is in default thus

could notissue any ruling against says that the point of law is paper not People, and

even names money, and then when there are no issues or any merit issues a

judgment ordering the clerks to strike it form the record. If theres no issue why would

you ever go to judgment??? An admiralty court might and if there are no US

Attorneys present and I am not present? This judge means to trick the clerks as they

17


18/47

would not know it is an attempt to secure a civil conviction against The People as the

US Marshal told me not them so that he, the Judge, can later blame them via

invoking Marbury when Obama himself ordered this and I can prove it: As soon as

this arrived, after the State of the Union Address in January, I informed The People

that we had been tried and convicted thus stricken from the record. The US marshal

was at my home on or around February 14th, 2010. As soon as he left I informed ThePeople I just volunteered to be Obamas test case. Then I began my world court

petition as I had to hold the clerks and Justices guilty until the paper ruling arrived

thus I had to mail it before the paper ruling arrived to then be able to prove motivation

and intent was not present thus it is not guilty; in this case I, Susan, had to keep

holding you guilty until proven innocent by Obama himself. The legal presumptions

are turned on their heads as we are now a form opposite a Republic. So if you check

the dates and if you know chain of command theory plus that the Post Master

General has special privileges and immunities in this case so you invoked them to

then grant them to SCOTUS and The People then Obama hadto issue the order.

Once you deliver the paper into the custody of the post office as The People fund it

and you are acting for The People it is a direct, two party contract. There is no

middleman. It has to be one of two people who cast a legal vote in election 2008. I

had to be acting with pure and absolute intention and motivation; no matter the route

it then takes it HAS to land at Obama as it is now between me, Roberts and Obama.

The chain reaction or chain of causation: If I slug Obama then he will slug Roberts.

Then I go for Obama directly and so Roberts will slug me, hell act in defense of the

People, and I go back to SCOTUS. I slugged Obama in December in Sioux City; he

then hit Roberts with the State Of The Union Address; next I slugged Obamameaning to land on his desk thus he then sent a Marshal to threaten me so I then

entered world court, writing down my special privileges and immunities argument for

the first time thus my motive and intent was purest so Roberts received those

privileges and immunities even if he did not know itRoberts, w/o any knowledge of

my world court petition, defended himself thus The People by speaking out regarding

Obamas speech thus paving the way for another SCOTUS filing as I told world court

I would make one last attempt. I proved chain of command theory is law not theory

as the theory is you need no institutions as you can send the idea instead of your

person; ideally you should not need any paper. Its a matter of physics. Writing it

down caused it to land at Obama exactly, as I had to ensure he would get it as then

we would have proof of life Obama himself would prove he received it with his own

words. I stated this prediction, my knowledge as I owned it, in my petitions.

Read the Sioux City complaint: I said, As we are now at the adjudication of the

Declaration and Constitution as that is what adjudicating the natural birth clause then

is, put the documents on the back of a truck and drive them out to Sioux City;

18


19/47

Roberts can appear and adjudicate them here as Obama and Co. may keep

Washington DC and everything in it as we do not want or need the trappings of

power. I slugged Obama at the back of his knee, a weak spot for any man as but

even weaker for those who are fascists as fascists are wholly unaware of their

environment. I told the court this; I told Obama this yet he still fell for it. I told The

People: A flamingos knees are inverted; a flamingo might see you coming thusmount a better defense but a Nazi cant. The Sioux City complaint got to him as I

planned as the State of the Union Address and the US Marshals action and words

are my proof. First I stood aside Roberts by directly engaging him; then Obama

conspired to attack Roberts at the State of the Union Address as other the Justices

might not appear but Roberts would and usually most Justices do so he could count

upon a few being there like: Samuel Alito and Sandra Sotomayor who I named. He

conspired and then he acted to do it as I named Roberts and the truth as my

price.

Each time any federal agent who harassed me asked me to name my price I named:

John Roberts and the truth. You may ask two Secret Service Agents and a US

Marshal named Mike Sanford. The last US Marshal was not Sanford and I knew it

would not be. But when asked for a reference by the Secret Service I said, John

Roberts. They looked at me; I have two cases on the case conference list; call him. If

Im wrong why is the Secret Service here asking me about John Roberts? Your proof

is if Obama is natural born and Im not the constitutionally set President and

Commander then you would not be here asking about Roberts as youre Secret

Service. You would only be here if I am right and Obama is a foreigner as that then

makes it a stand off between me and Roberts so youd protect us not Obama. WhenUS Marshal Mike Sanford asked me what it would take to STOP me from securing

justice (youre never supposed to stop acting to secure justice or else youd be

inherently unjust) I said, I need to hear John Roberts tell me that he did or did not

hear the case as thats proof. I did this as a fascist defines what your price is and

then tries to use it against you; usually they create fear or make you afraid. They also

use bribes. Obama CANT go before SCOTUS via due process so I kept naming

John Roberts knowing Obama would have to make an attempt to get him thus get

me sooner or later as he had to go through us to overthrow The People.

I did something else too: as I had to prove to The People that Bush V Gore is not

treason on the clerks and Justices part as they do not understand it I then went back

to SCOTUS with 09-6777 naming Roberts and Alito, the two Justices appointed by

Bush. I named them ahead of time long before Obama attacked them - for several

reasons but one reason is that then The People would have a record they could fact

check. Any person can now go look at the record him or her self thus come to

ownership of the knowledge. I stated that If Bush is not legal then they are not. I told

19


20/47

the People within 09-6777: I make Roberts and Alito legal; they make themselves

legal and I make myself legal; we then make each other legal. The Constitution is

reciprocal. The People may not remove them as you truly believed they were legal if

you went before them and your action is the proof according to Marbury. If you were

denied justice? You had other choices such as world court. This was in 2009; so who

did Obama then reach out and touch in January of 2010? Roberts and Alito. I wasable to tell The People this once I mailed out the world court petition so that they

could begin checking the record I have been creating for over three years. It extends

back to 1997 and 1998: I named unjust taxation in NY in 1998 as I and other

women are humanly trafficked by the states across state lines in cases of domestic

violence but for the last three years I have been creating it double time and all alone.

I said, Its proof Obama is running from me. Its proof they are legal as Roberts went

to the press so thats correct chain of command theory as he went to The People and

Alito issued the dissenting opinion or so the oppress told me as the press says he

mouthed the words not true. Not true? Its wrong as Obama conspired to do this -

he planned it and it was calculated; he meant to injure The People - and I can and

will prove it. Wrong it is only it is Obama not the Justices, not The People and not

the ruling.

Obama used corporate money to buy the Office as all US dollars are corporate as

the Federal Reserve is a private corporation and Dc incorporated in 1871. So the

Supreme Court says it will level the playing field by allowing corporations to donate

more The People can do what Obama did and Obama says the Justices wrongly

decided the case. I, Obama, can and may do it but you may not or youll unseat me

and my fascist friends. Thats Barack Obama arguing against the equal protectionand due process clauses exactly as I told him he would have to do; I said, Do you

know what youll have to do? Youll have to find a way to argue against The

Constitution. The press ran with it. The Justices are wrong, and The People believed

it as they did not hear it: to wrongly decide a case is treason. Obama made a

mistake:

I, Susan, never said the Justices decided BVG wrongly; I said The People did. In

Petition 07-9804 I supported the Supreme Court plus I had evidence and proof it is

The People: On her talk show Rosie ODonell said that the absentee ballot she

received was defective and she did not know who she voted for thus warning The

People. Then The People did not vote and then they did not rise up to sue in their

own defense when the election did end up in a court of law. Not one person knew the

difference between absolute and whole numbers or that the chief Justice and

President stand each other down or that the oath of Office reads I will. You MAY

accuse a Justice of treason but if you do? Thats moral authority thus vertical checks

and balances thus you are arguing that you are the Chief Justice or the President. If

20


21/47

the election itself is in SCOTUS or if the clause you are arguing is natural birth? You

then are arguing youre the President. you go to SCOTUS; its between you, the

Chief Justice and President; you stand aside the Chief Justice and then you stand

down the President for if the chief Justice is not guilty then the President is and WHO

appoints Justices? The President so if it goes past a sitting Chief who began it or did

it, thus a new Chief sits? It has to be the People thus Bush Jr. is not guilty but thePeople are responsible. And if Obama used propaganda and assaulted and battered

The People to then assume the Office illegally by denying them informed consent

and even incapacitating them? The People, of which clerks and Justices are, are not

guilty but Obama is guilty. Obama knew In Re Susan sat on the docket; he was

served over and over. An authority case never needs to be heard in person as there

is no argument against it in the case of Marbury or BVG. The math of BVG is wrong.

The Latin of BVG is misleading. Math and Latin are dead; they never change; they

are. Its why we use math and Latin: you cant corrupt them. Obama is a

constitutional law professor or so he claims. He read my case and he knew; he

always knew he did not meet natural birth and he was assuming that nobody would

ever know or that if they did they could never prove it. He and his team of lawyers

provided by the Democratic Party mostly deliberately planned this assuming they

were invincible. They not once accounted for the will and liberty of Americans when

the odds are set against them. They never had faith in US law.

I did; I found a 400 year old contract within the Louisiana Purchase that we never had

an opportunity to enforce so it sat on a shelf in Spain unajudicated. This contract

allows Susan to establish an actual allodial title on behalf of the Sioux who have a

rare X gene linking them to China and the trip across the Pacific via Polynesia not theBering Strait. I can use the Iroquois to connect us to the people who came across

the strait thus establish the Iroquois Confederacy has its roots in the biblical tower of

Babel story. All four races went their separate ways; only the Iroquois completed the

journey north and down again. The promise The Creator made is that we would all

meet again. The Iroquois Confederacy is our direct legal relative as the Magna Carta

is indirect as it protects the aristocracy; Franklin proposed this with the Albany Plan.

The Confederacy protects The People as you vote and as the checks and balances

go form one person or one vote up into the Office of the Chief. If you follow that one

contract in the LA Purchase backward and forwards you find yourself at The Creator,

as you go through Abraham as this contract is based upon land grant from the King

who got it form the Pope. If you can keep going thus resolve evolution and Uniformity

you then end up at the creation of the universe. This then connects all of us to each

other as I can use it to undo contracts back to the explosion of the Godhead into

time. Allodial title means that you may not make any improvements as The Creator

created it perfect so if you make an improvement allodial title is dissolved. As Im the

constitutionally set President I can adjudicate all the paper thus give the Sioux their

21


22/47

land back but as they do not possess allodial title w/o me? They join the class thus

becoming legal persons under the law and as the land is already a National Park?

They then automatically own it again! A more perfect form? Its most perfect or

elegant thus I establish man does have sovereignty over the earth and so his own

person; will and liberty is an actual endowment made by God thus we are actually

created equal but biologically distinct as men and women. And guess what?

In an interview Obama answered a question with this: The LA Purchase is the thing

that will help the earthquake in Haiti. Thats an actual Freudian slip; its a unique

identifier you may apply only to me of all 6 billion people on earth thus Obama

confessed. I can prove this as he said it so everybody heard it plus a fascist can

never be w/o notes or he then tells his truth; he says his actual reasonsthe real

reason Obama uses notes all of the time is he cant have anybody knowing his truth.

Its not the same as Regan using a speechwriter at all. The US Marshal who

threatened me proved this as he read only three phrases from the paper and then

went to town telling me the truth not what was on the paper. A Freudian slip is deep

not what most Americans think it is. I myself made on in this case: On April 4 th, 2007 I

entered the name Jackson instead ofJohnson and was stunned; it scared me. I had

al of this but still did not have one piece: Andrew Jackson taking this part of FL

illegally as that makes my standing to sue perfect. Im sitting in Jacksonville the city

not realizing the connection in 2008 or even 2009. I said his name and someone said

theres a statue of old hickory downtown and it hit me: JACKSONville; I lived in New

Orleans; Jefferson knew Spain would not be able to secure FL thus fall into our

hands like ripe fruit. A lawsuit is ripe; I saw the rise of fascism or Hitler ripen in that

stadium in 2004. This suit will ripen when Obama attacks Roberts thus ThePeople directly.

More proof is: The action taken on 11/20/08 seems to be a crime. Is it? The Officers

created an impossible standard for the clerks and Justices by defaulting on 11/05/08

and by colluding to pass Resolution 511 thus making the ballot wholly criminal as

then the two major party candidates sponsored it and/or were the subject of it and

were violating natural birth thus targeting women as well as the clerks and Justices

as it would have to be heard in SCOTUS. It is a legislative action from which women

cannot escape as one of those persons then would become the President thus never

side with women if it meant they must leave office to hear the case for equality. They

defaulted with deliberation and at least two of them are lawyers, Clinton and Obama

so they knew exactly what they were doing but exploited their knowledge regardless.

So I created my own standard in The Peoples defense: I made it DIFFICULT for the

clerks or Roberts to act to file the paperwork: I had John Roberts and I, as Thomas

Jefferson, traipsing through PUERTO RICO looking for the Chupacabra in an

attachment as it is about belief versus true belief and life as proof people are the

22


23/47

proof - and as I was targeting but not unjustly Sandra Sotomayor as Obama and his

cronies are out to corrupt the Court so needed to target her as she places Hispanic

above American and I knew it. The same fireman issue she had before her we had in

Jacksonville only in reverse. As her ruling was going to be overturned Obama

targeted her for reasoning: To make her seem to be stupid and incapable and to

make her look like a racist thus causing dissent among The People and between ThePeople and the Court. So I beat him to the punch naming PUERTO RICO or

Hispanicas I witnessed kids who identify with Hispanic place themselves last when

they were asked what others thought about them and what they thought about their

own person. As Obama must do something to shake the faith of The People but at

the same time create a you versus they attitude he would choose Hispanic and a

person who is a judge who had a case coming before SCOTUS. Every person has

been saying Obama will seat more Justices then any other President thus the

fascists need to keep him in power to do what they want to do. When he named

Sotomayor? I could then use her name to prove him guilty by entering my

foreknowledge and knowledge of this issue to world court.

I was especially harsh in the world court petition as I said Sandra Sotomayor is the

worst, most dangerous thing that ever happened to those firemen. I also said people

are people; they arent right or wrong. I meant that an idea was the worst thing: If you

cant achieve then nobody can. I told the world court about the SCOTUS case re is

Hispanic a class the same as white thus is TX guilty of school segregation? When

Obama named the LA Purchase he was naming Hispanic as: De Soto marched

across New Mexico. Before New Mexico it was Mexico thus Hispanics were present

when the golden spike was driven into the tracks of the transcontinental railroadconnecting all four races once again. I was raised in Troy, NY, home of Uncle Sam

who got his name by stamping property of the US on meat. Obama truly believes we

have property of US stamped on your forehead; do you or is property of the US

stamped upon your heart?

Obamas answer to the reporter was more than telling; it made no sane or rational

sense so I had another answer: to break the will of the individual you must get them

to begin doubting their own sanity. Then the individual begins rationalizing and

justifying their words and actions; they deny reality as ethical Germans did. When

The People heard Obama they began talking about it; they said they knew they

elected a lunatic but what was wrong with the reporter for not asking Obama what

in the world his words meant? At last a person said: No matter how I rearrange his

words and no matter how I define these words they make no sense at all. Can

somebody please tell me what these words might mean as I cant make any sane or

rational sense out of them? Thats how it is done; do it over and over so much

everyone begins to deny reality including the press and then when no person

23


24/47

supports the dissenters even the dissenters give up. Indifference sets in. and in the

US as the US Marshals service keeps you from leaving the country then it would

stop me from leaving so the ethical Germans that wanted to leave could not. I caught

this person; I posted that he or she might want to look at a lawsuit on the SCOTUS

docket that was posted online; he or she could read the suit. I said Obama mightbe

referring to this lawsuit as a part of it revolves around the LA Purchase and Jefferson.I did not tell this person what Obama meant; all he needed to know is that in

Obamas world those words did make sense. I knew but he was going to have to

figure it out for himself: Didnt Obama try to condition The People via use of

Jeffersons image? And if I designed a lawsuit so that he had to see it as it then went

to him, it landed at his desk, and I have been in two earthquakes and I referred to

myself as an earthquake then if Obama said this he had to be claiming ownership of

the knowledge even it was a Freudian slip. Obama purchased the election thus

purchased The People and so sold us into slavery via Marxism, a philosophy of

business not government. He cant get around I, Susan, the person who entered the

LA Purchase so cant help the world as I can and will as I knew our American destiny

thus our fate had indeed manifested at long last.

The Obama birtherconspiracy theory? A conspiracy is or is not; theres no such thing

as a conspiracy theory. Is Obama sitting as President when he is not constitutionally

set at all in any way? Yes so the conspiracy is. You may have a conspiracy

hypothesis. My Obamacare conspiracy hypothesis? Obamacare is a ten trillion

dollar ransom note.

Congress truly believes we are property. Recently it sold us into slavery with thehealthcare scam. 18 states are already suing. I can save them some money:

Congress used reconciliation to insert a right into our law as they cant pass an

amendment naming it as a right. Its not possible to reconcile unless you first concile.

Congress has yet to act conciliatory after declaring war based upon bad evidence. I

pre-empted Congress: About 8 months ago I, the constitutionally set President and

Commander, convened the lawful, constitutionally set government of The People. We

were in congress at the library. You may fact check this with meetup.com and the

Beaches Library. I posted public notice: The issue is Edmund Burkes Conciliation

with the Colonies People as a dollar amount - and we might answer this question;

Is Thomas Jefferson a right wing conservative nut? as The People do not know

English words have an old usage and a modern usage. Latin never changes. Thus if

Congress uses reconciliation to pass healthcare after BVG, after a war they declared

wrongly and after they installed Obama? They are voting to suspend the rules or:

voting to suspend the Presidential vote. Edmund Burke said: All that is

necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.

24


25/47

The Congress has voted to suspend the vote and it did it afterObama attacked the

Justices with Congress sitting as judge and jury. Congress is a fabricated criminal

venue and that action was meant to convince thus indoctrinate The People so that

they truly believed they are helpless and powerless. Hopeless. John Roberts went to

The People; Alito issued the dissenting opinion andas this is the second time in his

life that false criminal charges were pressed against him in a fabricated venueThomas wife announced she would form a political party or so I legally presume as

this time Thomas could not defend himself so she did as he was gagged like Benson

of Benson V US found within and attached to my Sioux City lawsuit. I wrote clear

and present danger on it, as that is absent from the ruling. Its a civil conviction. Why

gag him? So nobody would know the truth as the federal judge and US Attorney/s

involved would have no salary if the truth was let loose. The truth is that judge and

the involved US attorneys had several other choices. They never had to go here as if

organized tax collectors who are robbing you are your legal problem as they are now

a mob who has seized all power then can and may you yourself organize and so

collect money taxes by selling your knowledge in a kit? You may give your

knowledge away as the Founders set the precedent or you may entice a citizen to

sue you thus take you to the Supreme Court by selling an empty box but can and

may you sell the knowledge of the original documents that you possess? This

constituted a court of admiralty as Bensons lawyer was not allowed to mount any

defense; I truly believe that Jefferson introduced the idea of the Seventh Amendment

to prevent courts of admiralty from trying and convicting us civilly without any jury and

w/o the opportunity to mount a defense. Thomas and Scalia should know as they are

originalists: Is the original intent of The Constitution and Bill of Rights to deny us

rights or grant us rights? I did not bother to look to see if the correct flags were flyingbut regardless we may have another point of law on our hands: Law of the Sea as

this speech was broadcast internationally and as we know Canada and Britain were

and are harmed by the war, a war Obama had a part in declaring and that he then

never addressed as he let the bad declaration stand thus sent People off to die in

defense of a dead institution of government without any named reason or cause.

Weapons of mass destruction was found to be false; later it was discovered that VP

Cheney with ties to Halliburton had placed false and misleading stories in the New

York Times as the New York times reporters admitted they did what he asked and

the evidence thus proof was and is documented and: we found no nuclear

capabilities in Iraq.

I filed a case in SCOTUS that cuts these guys off at the pass every single time. Every

time; they cantdefeat The People as it is physics but they will wear themselves out

trying, or so I told my Secretary of Defense who is constitutionally set as he knows

his stuff and so I hired him, I cant wait for them to argue a SCOTUS case in front of

Congress. Obama as judge and the members of Congress as the jury. Who will

25


26/47

believe this as Obama could have entered an Americus brief which he never would

as hes no friend of the People, filed as a third party which he is as hes a fascist,

entered the court as the case himself again which he is as hes not natural born,

and/or issued an Executive Order which Obama cant as hes not the legal,

constitutionally set President: I, Susan, am. You cant order yourself installed. You

can never get around me as I moved SCOTUS with an Executive Order I issued thusI claimed ownership of the knowledge. By denying The People the protection of the

law? You are denying them the benefits of their labor or violating Article 1 Section 8

as I copyrighted it in their name not my own.

Federal Office holders may enter SCOTUS directly, presumably in defense of The

People. Do you know how hard I was laughing when I realized that THE MEMBERS

OF CONGRESS AND OBAMA PLUS ALL OF HIS LAWYERS DO NOT KNOW

THIS? Are you an Officer of the Court or Voter? An officer of the Legislative or a

Voter? I told my Secretary of Defense: USC 1331, the Voter must go through the

federal appeals court, is against the law of physics. Contracts are between two

parties not three. In this entire universe there is no third party contract; its a false

appearance. Trust me: even the trinity is not a third party contract. Even President,

Commander and Chief Justice is not a third party contract.

The law seemed impossible to enforce; I went to the Department of Justice working

chain of command. Now politicized and stocked with Obama appointees I could not

move one employee to act upon even my smallest complaint all of which are

supported by proof. I asked: Did you know of a case named US v Nixon? Since when

do you work for Obama and not The People? I, Susan, the constitutionally setPresident and Commander, work for The People thus you work for The People not

for me. Our repeated petitions fell upon deaf ears. This is the endemic corruption the

Founders warned us about as Officers shirked their duties and we rose up as a

society like France until we are taxed to death as the debt accrues without any relief

and as Marxism has caused a confluence and so class of businessmen and

politicians to form and the businesses are being suckered as this always results in

the politicians making out like bandits via bribes while the businessmen begin to fail

until government owns everything thus you have a politburo or political bureau.

Marxists, Fabians - they all fail as they cant pay the bribes eventually but

businessmen are convinced they themselves are the one time such philosophies will

succeed. Its egomania. As businesses are The People I had to defend them too:

About three years ago I discovered a law of this universe that makes it impossible for

China to carry out its nuclear threat; China then could not act to seize American

business interests but if it did we would have lots of options. Thus I informed North

Korea. North Korea then tested Obama and he failed; Obama awarded us to North

Korea as Clinton went there to secure the release of hostages and Clinton like it or

26


27/47

not is an ex-President so that action asserts or implies sovereignty is not ours. What

do we have a Secretary of State for? No ex-President should be acting in this

capacity especially if he committed perjury while under oath in a court of law as he

then injured The People. I have news for The People, just and unjust: Guilty? Even if

the piece of paper does not exist you are guilty if motive and intent to cause harm

exists and guilt happens to be a state of being anda legal designation.

Guilt: Obama and all in his employ wanted us to focus on Hawaii and his mother

when that is not the correct application of the law. Paper would make it procedural

not substantive due process and as for informed consent? We were not denied it as

Obama changed his name to Obama from Barry Sotero and then ran around telling

us his father is Kenyan. He wrote a whole book about it. He then claimed to be a dual

citizen of Britain and America and that his British c

Documents

THE PEOPLE V THE OFFICERS: TREASON