77
The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American and Global Pharmaceutical Industry and its Impact on Planning Functions

The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

  • Upload
    pammy98

  • View
    1.163

  • Download
    7

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American and Global Pharmaceutical Industry and its Impact on Planning Functions

Page 2: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

2

Overview

Some definitionsBrief history to 1850Origins of pharma companiesChanging orientations

Impact of innovationSocial, cultural & political change

Development of organic chemistry & synthetic pharmaceuticalsImpact of 2 World Wars

Manufacturing nuts & bolts

5 generations of pharma innovation

Industry structure c.1980

“Linear development”

Recent M&A activity

Present situation

FuturePharmaceutical evolution

Types of innovation

Chemical genetics

Page 3: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

3

Definition of StructureThe conventional concept of industry structure relates to:

– the pattern of ownership (who owns what), – intensity of competition (how many competitors there are)– and the economic power (ability to dictate price) of industry participants (firms or companies). 

According to neo-classical economic theory, the more competitors there are within an industry, the lower is their individual ability to control price.

Page 4: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

4

Economic Divisions, Industrial Sectors, Industries, and Industry Subsectors:

Economic Divisions, examples:Agriculture; Minerals; Manufacturing; Wholesale trade; Retail trade; Services; etc.

Industrial Sectors: Manufacturing examples:Food products; Chemicals and allied products; Fabricated metal products; etc.

Industries, Chemicals and allied products examples:Industrial inorganic chemicals; Plastics and synthetic resins; Drugs; Soaps and detergents; etc.

Industry Subsectors, Drugs examples:Medicinal chemicals and botanical products; Pharmaceutical preparations; In vivo and in vitro diagnostic substances; Biological products, except diagnostics.

Page 5: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

5

The Chemical Process and Pharmaceutical Industries

Bulk or Commodity Chemicals:Sold on a price-per-weight basis.

Specialty Chemicals:Sold based upon performance-in-use characteristics.

Fine Chemicals:

Sold as precise chemical structures of very high purity.

Pharmaceutical Products:

10 Categories (see next 2 slides).

Page 6: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

6

Categories of Pharmaceutical Products - 1

1) Ethical pharmaceuticals: “legend pharmaceuticals,” patented, brand name, prescription drugs:Lipitor, Prevacid, Risperdal, etc.

2) Generic pharmaceuticals: non-patented, prescription drugs, with “bioequivalence” to the legend pharmaceuticals:Atenolol, Alprazolam, Metoprolol, etc.

3) Biologics & Biological Products: Vaccines, serums, toxoids, etc.

4) Over-the-Counter Medications and Remedies:Bayer Aspirin, Lanacaine, Zantac 75, etc.

Page 7: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

7

Categories of Pharmaceutical Products - 2

5) Homeopathic Medicines (minute quantities):Belladonna, Gelsemium, Nux Vomica, etc.

6) Vitamins & Minerals;7) Medicinal Botanicals & Herbal Medicines:Black Cohosh, Echinacea, Ginseng, etc.

8) Botanical Extracts & Phytochemicals:p-Courmaric Acid, Chlorogenic Acid, Sulforaphane, etc.

9) Dietary Supplements:Chondroitin Sulfate, Creatine, Shark Cartilage, etc.

10) Nutraceuticals.

Page 8: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

8

Ancient PeriodO

ldes

t cul

tivat

ed o

pium

Sum

er

Edw

in S

mith

pap

yrus

Geo

rge

Ebe

rs p

apyr

us

4000

BC

_

3400

BC

_

3000

BC

_

1700

BC

_

600

BC

_

Ben

Cao

Kon

g M

o

Hin

du V

edas

– “

clas

sica

l”

Pen

Tso

a

Page 9: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

9

Classical Period

Cle

opat

ra

Hip

pocr

ates

Theo

phra

stus

50 B

C_

400

BC

_

500

BC

_

300

BC

_

200

AD

_C

laud

ius

Gal

en

Page 10: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

10

Medieval Period

Da

Vin

ci i

n M

edic

i gar

dens

“Rha

zes”

“Avi

cenn

a”

4th C

rusa

de13

00 A

D_

1400

AD

_

1000

AD

_

900

AD

_

1100

AD

_

1200

AD

_

1500

AD

_

Page 11: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

11

Age of Discovery - 1Sa

ck o

f Med

ici p

alac

e

1650

_

1700

_

1500

_

1450

_

1550

_

1600

_

1750

_

“Par

acel

sus”

Da

Vin

ci m

oves

to F

ranc

e

Reg

ency

of C

athe

rine

de

Med

ici

Juan

del

Veg

oA

ntim

ony

as e

met

ic (L

ouis

XIV

)

Lad

y M

ary

Wor

tley

Mon

tagu

Cha

rles

Mar

ie d

e la

Con

dam

ine

Page 12: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

12

The Proposition of the Usual Dose

Paracelsus

(1493-1541)

“The dose makes the poison”

Page 13: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

13

Age of Discovery - 2

1825

_

1800

_

1775

_

1850

_

Hum

phre

y D

avy

Just

us v

on L

iebi

g

Frie

dric

h W

öhle

r

Mic

hael

Far

aday

Ale

xand

er v

on H

umbo

ldt

Will

iam

With

erin

g

Her

man

n K

olbe

Frie

dric

h W

ilhel

m S

ertü

rner

Page 14: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

14

The changed context of drug discovery and development

The 1800s: natural sources; limited possibilities; prepared by individuals; small scale; not purified, standardized or tested; limited administration; no controls; no idea of mechanisms.

The 1990s: synthetic source; unlimited possibilities; prepared by companies; massive scale; highly purified, standardized and tested; world-wide administration; tight legislative control; mechanisms partly understood.

Page 15: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

15

Sources of drugs

Animal insulin (pig, cow)

growth hormone (man) (Creutzfeldt-Jakob)

Plant digitalis (digitalis purpurea - foxglove)

morphine (papaver somniferum)

Inorganic arsenic mercury lithium

Synthetic chemical (propranolol)

biological (penicillin) biotechnology (human insulin)

Page 16: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

16

Origin of Pharmaceutical Companies – 1

Important corporate entities emerged gradually in Germany, primarily during the late 19th century -- following Perkin’s discovery -- with companies like:

1) Leopold Cassella & Cie -- founded in Mainkur in 1807.

2) Boehringer Ingelheim -- Stuttgart in 1817, Mannheim in 1872.

3) Badische Anilin und Soda Fabrik (BASF) – Mannheim, association during 1861 between Friedrich Engelhorn and the Clemm brothers.

4) Farbenwerke Hoechst -- joint venture by Eugen Lucius, Wilhelm Meister and Adolf Bruning near Frankfurt in 1862, reorganized as a joint-stock company in 1880.

5) Farben Fabrik vormals Friedrich Bayer -- Friedrich Bayer in Leverkusen in 1863, reorganized as a joint-stock company in 1881.

6) Kalle & Co. -- established by Paul W. Kalle in 1864 in Biebrich.

7) Aktien Gesellschaft für Anilin Fabrikation (AGFA), established by Carl Martius and Paul Bartholdy, Rummelsberg (near Berlin) in 1873.

Page 17: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

17

Origin of Pharmaceutical Companies – 2

Early companies in Switzerland:CIBA (Gesellschaft für Chemische Industrie Basel) -- founded in 1860 by Alexandre Clavel, reorganized as CIBA in 1884, following his death.

Geigy -- founded by J.J. Müller in 1860 while trading in imports on behalf of the Geigy family; Johann Rudolf Geigy took over the business in 1862.

Sandoz AG -- founded in 1886 by Edouard Sandoz and chemist, Alfred Kern, after Sandoz had worked for Durand & Huguenin.

F. Hoffman La Roche -- founded in 1894 by Fritz Hoffman, husband of Adèle La Roche.

Page 18: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

18

Origin of Pharmaceutical Companies – 3

Early U.S. Companies (The 1st Wave):1824 - William S. Merrell & Co., Cincinnati, Ohio., purveyor of medicinal botanicals and their extracts; became notorious as the manufacturer of Thalidomide in 1950s-1960s.

1830 - Philadelphia pharmacy that became Smith, Kline & Co. in 1875 and Smith, Kline and French (SKF) in 1891. Manufactured extracts, elixirs, syrups, tablets and pills. Supplied U.S. troops with quinine during the Mexican-American War (1846-1848) and the Union army during the American Civil War (1861-1865).

1836 - Powers and Weightman Company began as Philadelphia manufacturing apothecary; 1905 merged with Rosengarten & Co.; 1927 merged with Merck & Co. 1849 - Charles Pfizer & Co. founded in Brooklyn, NY, to produce a flavored candy form of the drug santonin, an anthelmintic Wormseed plant extract. Supplied the Union army with large quantities of borax, camphor, chloroform, cream of tartar, iodine, morphine, tartaric acid, and mercurial compounds.

1857 - E.R. Squibb & Co. founded in Brooklyn, NY, to produce ether and chloroform in more consistent form than currently available. Contracted to supply the Union army with sturdy medicine chests, suitable for field use, each containing 52 standardized medicines in unbreakable tins, for $100.00 each.

1860 - John Wyeth & Brother, Philadelphia pharmacy that established a mail-order catalog for pharmaceutical products in 1862; became the Wyeth-Ayerst division of American Home Products in 1931.

Page 19: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

19

Origin of Pharmaceutical Companies – 4

Early U.S. Companies (The 2nd Wave):1866 - Parke-Davis, Detroit, Michigan. Together with H.K. Mulford was 1st American company to produce diphtheria antitoxin. In 1902 was 1st American pharmaceutical company to build its own research laboratory; also 1902, 1st company ever to manufacture epinephrine (Adrenalin) -- by extraction from adrenal glands. In 1928 production of 2 pituitary hormones, vasopressin & oxytocin -- also by extraction.

1876 - Eli Lilly, Indianapolis, Indiana

1885 - Upjohn, Kalamazoo, Michigan

1888 - Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, Illinois

1888 - G.D. Searle, Chicago, Illinois

Page 20: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

20

Pierre Pelletier and Joseph Caventou established the first modern pharmaceutical company to produce pure quinine from

imported cinchona bark in 1826.

Page 21: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

21

The “Orienting Effect” of Innovations

Occurs mainly because the scientific and medical principles, or mechanisms of action, are not well understood at the time of introduction.

Leads to:Drive to discover missing pieces of knowledge.

Imitation and incremental innovation by competitors.

Increase in knowledge and diffusion of technology.

Exhaustion of technological potential & commercial opportunity.

Page 22: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

22

New orientations (scientific, political, social, cultural) can lead to dramatic changes in industry structure (the de facto ability to

control price).

Page 23: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

23

The Birth of Organic Chemistry – 1856

Cl-

CH3

CH3

N+

N

NNH2

H

Mauveine William Henry Perkin

Page 24: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

24

Mendeleyev Periodic Table – 1866

Mendeleyev, Dmitry

Page 25: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

25

Dyes and Drugs – the fundamental relationship.(Blessings of the by-product coke oven)

In the beginning, reds came from the female cochineal, kermes insects, brazil wood, and the madder plant (of southern France); blues came from woad and the indigo plant (of northern India); and quinine came from cinchona.

O

O

OH

OH

NH

NH

O

ON

N

CH2

OH

O

CH3H

QuinineAlizarin Indigo

NH2

Aniline Naphthalene Anthracene

N

NH

NH

NH

NH

O-

O

O

O

O O

NH4+

Murexide

N+

N+

N+

O-

O-

O-

O

O

O

OH

Picric Acid

S

N

O

NO-

O

OH

Na+

Manchester Brown

Page 26: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

26

Aniline Companies Following Perkin’s Discovery

Company Country DateK.G.R. Oehler (Griesheim Elektron) Germany 1856Perkin & Sons Britain 1857Renard Frères (Societe la Fuchsine/1864) France 1858Read Holliday Britain 1858Girard et Georges de Laire France 1860Alexandre Clavel (Gesellschaft für Chemische Industrie Basel – CIBA/1884) Switzerland 1860J.J. Müller (Geigy/1862) Switzerland 1860J. Poirrier (S.A. des Matières Colorantes et Produits Chimiques de St. Denis/1881) France 1861Badische Anilin und Soda Fabrik (BASF) Germany 1861Meister Lucius & Bruning (Farbwerke Hoechst) Germany 1862Durand & Huguenin Switzerland 1862Friedrich Bayer (Farben Fabrik vormals Friedrich Bayer) Germany 1863Kalle & Co. Germany 1864Leopold Cassella & Cie. Germany 1867Aktien Gesellschaft für Anilin Fabrikation (AGFA) Germany 1867Schoellkoph Aniline & Chemical Co. USA 1879Sandoz AG Switzerland 1886Benzol Products USA 1910DuPont USA 1916Calco USA 1916Dow USA 1916National Aniline and Chemical Company USA 1917

Page 27: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

27

Bayer and Hoechst created the modern pharmaceutical industry

beginning in the 1880s.

Page 28: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

28

Development of Synthetic Pharmaceuticals – 1

1884 - Antipyrin (phenazone), antipyretic, Ludwig Knorr, Hoechst.

1886 - Antifebrin (acetanilide), antipyretic, Cahn and Hepp, Kalle.

1888 - Phenacetin, analgesic/antipyretic, Bayer.

1893 - Pyramidon (aminopyrine), analgesic/antipyretic, F. Stolz, Hoechst.

1898 - Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), analgesic/antipyretic, Bayer.

1902 - Diphtheria antitoxin, Emil von Behring, Hoechst.

1904 - Veronal (barbital), hypnotic/sedative, Bayer/Merck.

1905 - Novocaine, anesthetic, Alfred Einhorn, Hoechst.

1909 - Salvarsan, anti-syphilitic, Paul Ehrlich, Hoechst.

1922 - Insulin, hormone/diabetes (pancreatic extract), Hoechst.

1928 - Progynon (estradiol), hormone/estrogen, Schering

1935 - Prontosil (sulfanilamide), antibacterial, Gerhard Domagk, Bayer.

Page 29: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

29

Development of Synthetic Pharmaceuticals – 2

1938 - Sulfapyridine, antibacterial, May and Baker (Acquired by Les Etablissements Poulenc in late 1920s).

1938 - Sulfathiazol, antibacterial, May and Baker.

1939 - Dolantine, analgesic 4X as effective as Pyramidon, Hoechst.

1941 - Chloroquine, antimalarial, Winthrop, German Patent 683692 (1939).

1942 - Sulfamethazine, antibacterial, ICI.

1942 - Penicillin (C), antibacterial, A. Fleming, Merck, Pfizer, Squibb, etc.

1946 - Paludrine (chlorguanide), antimalarial, ICI

1948 - Streptomycin, antibacterial/tuberculostatic, Merck.

1954 - Hibitane, antibacterial, ICI.

1956 - Norethindrone (progesterone), precursor of oral contraceptives, Syntex (Mexico).

1957 - Fluothane, anesthetic, ICI.

1959 - Tolbutamide, antidiabetic, Hoechst.

1961 - Ampicillin, antibacterial (semi-synthetic penicillin), Beecham (GB).

1962 - Tolazamide, antidiabetic, Upjohn.

1964 - Inderal (propranolol), antihypertensive, ICI.

Page 30: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

30

Million Mark Synthetics

From 1884 – 1899 Antipyrin was the largest selling drug in the world. Hoechst was producing 14,000 kg/yr (15.4 tons/yr) in 1900.Pyramidon (aminopyrine), produced by Hoechst in 1896, is 3 times more powerful than Antipyrin.Novocain (procaine), produced by Hoechst in 1903, was the top selling local anesthetic worldwide for the next 50 years.

Page 31: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

31

Until World War I the most innovative companies were all in Germany, with

few notable exceptions: Burroughs Wellcome, Roche, CIBA, Parke-Davis

Page 32: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

32

1 - On the Eve of the World War I

Status of U.S. companies in 1914: Still largely centered on natural products and imports, primarily from Germany.

At the time of WWI, the U.S. and China were the world’s largest consumers of synthetic dyestuffs. However, out of a total worldwide production of 160,000 tons, the U.S. produced only 3,000 tons. (Germany produced over 140,000 tons)

Page 33: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

33

2 - On the Eve of the World War I

Status of British companies in 1914: By losing their dominance in synthetic dyestuffs to Germany, the British had put their entire chemical industry in jeopardy.

The three leading British dyestuffs firms: Ivan Levinstein, Read Holliday, and British Alizarine, all together produced only 4,000 tons of dyestuffs, whereas Germany produced 140,000 tons.

Page 34: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

34

Aftermath of World War I

Quote taken from The Manchester Guardian – During the darkest days of WWI

… henceforth “dyes and drugs must be thought of together. Whatever serves the modern dyemaker directly serves national health.”

Page 35: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

35

Impact of Early U.S. Federal Legislation

Forced companies to merge (eventually) in order to attain the size and financial strength to improve their scientific capabilities:

1902 Licensing Act – required manufacturers of vaccines, serums, & toxins to be licensed by the Secretary of Treasury through Laboratory of Hygiene.1906 Pure Food and Drug Act – regulated labeling & marketing claims about efficacy.

Permitted U.S. companies to manufacture German patented drugs:

1917 Trading with the Enemy Act.

Page 36: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

36

The Formation of Interessen Gemeinschaft Farbenindustrie Aktiengesellschaft

(I.G.Farben)

Carl Duisberg – Bayer Carl Bosch – BASF Chairman of the Aufsichtsrat, 1925-35 Chairman of the Vorstand, 1925-1935

Chairman of the Aufsichtsrat, 1935-1940

Page 37: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

37

I.G.FarbenA series of sequentially more powerful trusts

1904 – the Dreiverband – the very profitable Hoechst and its two satellites.

HoechstCassella (acquired by Hoechst in 1909)Kalle (acquired by Hoechst in 1908)

1906 – the Dreibund – A counter-measure to Hoechst’s growing power.

BASFBayerAGFA

1916 – the “Little I.G.” – (Interessengemeinschaft der deutschen Teerfarbenfabriken)

Dreibund + Dreiverband + the “Two Independents”Chemische Fabrik vormals Weiler-terMeer, andChemische Fabrik Griesheim Elektron)

1925 – Final integration of I.G. FarbenCassella and Kalle remained almost wholly owned subsidiaries, legally distinct but administered as part of the new corporation.

Page 38: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

38

Other German Alliances

Some companies remained independent of I.G. Farben by:Forming an Interessengemeinschaft (shared interests association) of their own:

Merck Darmstadt

Böhringer & Söhne

KnollOthers (examples):

Degussa (Deutsch Geld und Silber Scheide Anstadt) - formed an association with Henkel (in 1926).

Schering - merged with Kahlbaum (in 1927).

J.D. Riedel (Riedel de Haen AG) – became a subsidiary of Cassella after WWII (1955).

Rutgerswerke - founded in 1848, an innovative leader in tar derivatives.

Page 39: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

39

The Evolution of Imperial Chemical Industries

Following World War I, Read Holliday, Bradford Dyers, and Calico Printers merged to form British Dyes, Ltd.

1919 – British Dyes, Ltd. merged with Ivan Levinstein and several smaller British Dyestuffs companies to form the British Dyestuff Corporation, in which the British Government took a stake until 1925.

1926 – British Dyestuffs Corporation merged with Brunner, Mond & Co., Nobel Industries, Ltd., United Alkalai Co., and the British Alizarin Company to form Imperial Chemical Industries. Still, they were no match for I.G. Farben!

Page 40: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

40

Aftermath of World War II

I.G. Farben

BASF (Ludwigshafen)

BASF (Leuna, etc.)

Bayer

Hoechst

USSRFrance

UKUSA

“In the interests of peace and democracy.”

Page 41: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

41

The Time for Structural Change

Perceptions of the short- and medium-term outlook for an industry can change almost overnight, but structural change to diversify feedstocks and supply lines of intermediates can take years, if not decades to accomplish.

Page 42: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

42

Sources of Pharmaceuticals

1. Plants and plant extracts

2. Animal extracts

3. Minerals

4. Chemical Synthesis

5. Fermentation

6. Biotechnology

Page 43: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

43

The Seven (7) Basic Organics

1. Benzene

2. Butylene

3. Ethylene

4. Methane

5. Propylene

6. Toluene

7. Xylene

Page 44: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

44

Hydrocarbon Feedstocks and Organic Raw Materials

Page 45: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

45

Feedstock Processing to Basic Organics

Page 46: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

46

“Trunk” of the Chemical Tree

Benzene Butylene Ethylene Methane Propylene Toluene Xylene Acetone Acetic

Acid Acetic Acid

Acetic Acid

Acetone Benzene Dimethyl Terephthalate

Adipic Acid Butadiene Ethylbenzene Dimethyl Terephthalate

Acrylonitrile Terephthalic Acid

Caprolactam Methyl t-Butyl Ether

Ethylene Dichloride

Formaldehyde Cumene para-Xylene

Cumene Vinyl Acetate

Ethylene Glycol

Methanol Isopropanol

Cyclohexane Ethylene Oxide

Methyl t-Butyl Ether

Phenol

Ethylbenzene Vinyl Acetate

Vinyl Acetate

Propylene Oxide

Phenol Vinyl Chloride

Styrene Styrene

Page 47: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

47

Pharmaceuticals from Fermentation

StatinsLipitor, etc.

AntibioticsPenicillins

Cephalosporins

Tetracyclines

Macrolides

Page 48: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

48

4 Basic Building Blocks of Biosynthesis

1. Acetyl coenzyme AMajor role in the synthesis of phenols, prostaglandins, macrolide antibiotics, and various fatty acids and their derivatives.

2. Deoxyxylulose phosphateTogether with mevalonic acid is responsible for a vast array of terpenoids and other steroids.

3. Mevalonic acidMajor precursor of cholesterol and other sterols.

4. Shikimic acidMajor precursor of phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan and, hence, the majority of plant alkaloids. Also involved in the biosynthesis of lignin, flavonoids, and other aromatics.

Page 49: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

49

Five “Generations” of Drug Development

1. Discovery of “active principles” in natural products, fermentations, and simple coal-tar derivatives: analgesics, antipyretics, anesthetics, hypnotics, sedatives (1820 - 1880).

2. Experimental therapeutics and chemotherapy. Use of synthetic organic dyes to identify pathogenic microorganisms and to manufacture antiprotozoal medicines, serums, toxins, and vaccines (1880 - 1930).

3. Introduction of sulfa drugs, antibiotics, antihistamines, vitamins, corticosteroids, and sex hormones (1930 - 1960).

4. Drugs to treat hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases; antianxiety drugs, antidepressants, other CNS; oral contraceptives; semisynthetic penicillins, cephalosporins; and NSAIDS (1960 - 1980).

5. Bio-engineered proteins, antineoplastics, antivirals; new drug delivery systems, and diagnostic tests based on recombinant DNA and monoclonal antibodies (1980 - ?).

Page 50: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

50

Evolution of Abbott Laboratories

Page 51: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

51

Evolution of GlaxoSmithKline

Page 52: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

52

Evolution of Wyeth

Page 53: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

53

Mergers & Acquisitions - 1

1996

1996

CIBA Geigy

Sandoz

Novartis 1996

Hoechst

Clariant

CIBA Specialties

1996

Crop Protection

Merck

1997

Syngenta

AstraZeneca

2000Astra AB

Zeneca

1999

ICI1993

Page 54: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

54

1997

2002

1999

19971999

2000

1995

1996

1994

Mergers & Acquisitions - 2

Dow

Elanco

Rohm & Haas Ag

Mycogen1997

Lilly

Union Carbide

Collaborative BioAlliance

Marion Merrell Hoechst

Roussel Uclaf

Sandoz Clariant Rorer

1990 1995

Fisons

Rhône-Poulenc

RhodiaCelanese

Aventis

Aventis CropScienceBayer

Page 55: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

55

Mergers & Acquisitions - 3

1995

SmithKline Beckman

SquibbBristol-Myers

Bristol-Myers Squibb

1982

Glaxo

Burroughs Wellcome

Glaxo Wellcome

SmithKline & French

Allergen Beckman Instruments

Beecham Group

SmithKline Beecham

1989

GlaxoSmithKline

2000

1989

ClairolDuPont

Pharmaceuticals

DuPont Proctor & Gamble

2001

Page 56: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

56

Mergers & Acquisitions - 4

Pfizer Pharmacia

Warner-Lambert

2000

2003

Agouron

1999

Parke-Davis

1970

SmithKline Beecham

Animal Health

1995

MedicalTechnologies

1998

Adams 2003

UpjohnPharmacia A.B.

Pharmacia & Upjohn

1995

Monsanto

2000

Agracetus

DekalbGenetics

Calgene

1997

Solutia

1997

Merck

SpecialtyChemicals

1995

Page 57: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

57

Industry Concentration 1996-2000

1999-2000 Combined 1997-1998 CombinedSales Number of Pharmaceutical Percent Number of Pharmaceutical PercentCategory Companies Sales of Total Companies Sales of TotalGreater than $10 Billion 10 141,189.9 48.5 3 37,671.4 16.0$5 Billion - $10 Billion 8 57,742.0 19.8 12 89,515.3 38.0$4 Billion - $5 Billion 2 9,062.5 3.1 5 22,405.7 9.5$3 Billion - $4 Billion 4 12,446.5 4.3 4 13,874.2 5.9$2 Billion - $3 Billion 6 14,426.0 5.0 7 16,370.5 7.0$1 Billion - $2 Billion 15 20,301.2 7.0 15 22,553.3 9.6$500 Million - $1 Billion 27 18,913.5 6.5 22 14,923.5 6.3$100 Million - $500 Million 54 15,064.3 5.2 63 16,375.1 7.0Less than $100 Million 45 1,852.1 0.6 41 1,709.3 0.7TOTAL 171 290,998.00 100.0 172 235,398.30 100.0

1998-1999 1996-1997 Greater than $10 Billion 6 77,258.8 29.9 2 24,643.9 10.6$5 Billion - $10 Billion 11 81,313.4 31.5 14 100,731.8 43.2$4 Billion - $5 Billion 4 18,711.1 7.2 2 8,884.4 3.8$3 Billion - $4 Billion 1 3,651.0 1.4 6 21,914.6 9.4$2 Billion - $3 Billion 7 17,403.3 6.7 8 18,410.9 7.9$1 Billion - $2 Billion 16 23,305.1 9.0 16 24,549.6 10.5$500 Million - $1 Billion 24 17,332.7 6.7 25 17,047.0 7.3$100 Million - $500 Million 68 17,569.2 6.8 57 15,212.0 6.5Less than $100 Million 41 1,745.6 0.7 40 1,793.2 0.8TOTAL 178 258,290.20 100.0 170 233,187.40 100.0

Page 58: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

The Present

What do we think we know?And why do we think we know it?

Page 59: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

59

Worldwide approximately 5 million people die each year from just 3

infectious diseases:

Tuberculosis

Malaria

HIV/AIDS

Page 60: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

60

Worldwide Sales of Leading Therapeutic Classes

(in BILLIONS of $USD) and Percent Growth (in local currency)

Class Therapeutic Sales Percent Sales PercentRank Class 1999-2000 Growth 2000-2001 Growth

1 Anti-Ulcers 15.8 12 17.4 132 Cholesterol & Triglycerol Reducers 13.4 21 15.9 213 Antidepressants 11.7 17 13.4 184 Calcium Antagonists (plain) 9.9 4 9.8 25 NSAIDS 7.7 23 9.5 266 ACE-Inhibitors (plain) 7.4 5 7.3 37 Cephalosporins & Combinations 7.3 4 6.9 -58 Non-narcotic Analgesics 6.2 1 6 39 Antipsychotics 5.1 26 6 2210 Oral Antidiabetics 4.8 13 5.9 26

Page 61: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

61

Pharmaceutical Sales in 13 Key MarketsRetail Pharmacy Sales (plus hospital sales in Japan only); Sept. to Sept.; in MILLIONS of (current; i.e., variable exchange rate)

$US Dollars and Percent Change from Previous Year (at a constant exchange rate; i.e., in local currency).

Region/ Retail Sales Percent Retail Sales Percent

Country 1999-2000 Change 2000-2001 Change

North America 100,202 16 133,380 16 United States 94,827 16 127,400 16 Canada 5,375 16 5,980 16Europe (top 5) 52,233 8 52,266 9 Germany 14,762 4 14,820 10 France 13,689 9 13,495 7 Italy 9,279 11 9,324 12 United Kingdom 9,111 8 9,117 7 Spain 5,392 8 5,507 11Japan 51,774 4 48,385 4Latin America (top 3) 13,235 6 13,071 -1 Brazil 5,129 -2 4,396 -14 Mexico 4,692 25 5,381 15 Argentina 3,414 -2 3,294 -4Australia/New Zealand 2,896 11 2,849 -2SELECTED TOTAL 220,340 10 249,951 11

Page 62: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

62

Companies Ranked by Pharmaceutical Sales (Ethicals + OTC); also shows Total Sales -1

IndustryRank Pharmaceutical Percent Change Total Percent(2001-2002) Company Sales Pharmaceuticals Sales Pharmaceuticals

1 Pfizer 26,949.00 19.40 32,259.00 83.542 GlaxoSmithKline 24,775.00 6.00 29,504.00 83.973 Merck 21,347.00 5.60 47,715.50 44.744 Bristol-Myers Squibb 19,423.00 22.30 19,423.00 100.00

5 AstraZeneca 16,480.00 5.00 16,480.00 100.006 Aventis 15,844.70 6.30 20,566.60 77.047 Johnson & Johnson 14,851.00 24.20 33,004.00 45.008 Pharmacia 13,837.00 9.40 13,837.00 100.009 Novartis 11,980.00 15.00 19,018.70 62.99

10 Wyeth 11,716.50 8.50 14,128.50 82.93Group Subtotal 177,203.30 245,936.30Group Avg. Ratio 78.00Percent of Grand Total 55.00 48.30

Page 63: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

63

Companies Ranked by Pharmaceutical Sales (Ethicals + OTC); also shows Total Sales -

2

IndustryRank Pharmaceutical Percent Change Total Percent(2001-2002) Company Sales Pharmaceuticals Sales Pharmaceuticals

11 Eli Lilly 11,542.50 13.20 11,542.50 100.0012 F.Hoffman-LaRoche 11,281.30 7.80 17,312.00 65.1613 Schering Plough 8,565.00 0.20 9,802.00 87.3814 Takeda 6,319.30 -4.20 8,281.70 76.3015 Abbott 6,277.00 6.60 16,285.30 38.5416 Sanofi Synthelabo 5,816.50 8.50 5,816.50 100.0017 Boehringer Ingelheim 5,717.90 4.90 6,001.20 95.2818 Bayer 5,136.00 -9.70 27,141.50 18.9219 Akzo Nobel 3,625.40 2.00 12,649.60 28.6620 Sankyo 3,478.90 -6.70 4,522.90 76.92

Group Subtotal 67,759.80 119,355.20Group Avg. Ratio 68.70Percent of Grand Total 21.00 23.40

Page 64: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

64

Companies Ranked by Pharmaceutical Sales (Ethicals + OTC); also shows Total Sales -

3

IndustryRank Pharmaceutical Percent Change Total Percent(2001-2002) Company Sales Pharmaceuticals Sales Pharmaceuticals

21 Eisai 3,341.60 10.30 3,557.00 93.9422 Shionogi 3,275.40 -5.20 3,462.30 94.6023 Azwell 3,236.90 N/A 3,364.40 96.2124 Yamanouchi 3,145.60 -1.50 3,966.10 79.3125 Merck KGaA 2,978.80 10.40 6,749.20 44.1426 Schering AG 2,893.90 13.40 4340.9 66.6727 Novo Nordisk 2,860.00 10.80 2,860.00 100.0028 Fujisawa 2,812.80 18.00 2,812.80 100.0029 Baxter International 2,786.00 18.40 7,663.00 36.3630 Daiichi Pharmaceutical 2,598.90 -5.90 2977.8 87.28

Group Subtotal 29,929.90 41,753.50Group Avg. Ratio 79.90Percent of Grand Total 9.30 8.20

Page 65: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

The Future

Assumptions, Paradigms, and Prospects

Page 66: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

66

Three Major Questions of Strategic Importance

1. In what direction is the pharmaceutical industry heading globally?

2. What are the key determining factors that will affect the future structure?

3. What impact will the future structure have on planning needs and functions?

Page 67: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

67

In what direction is the pharmaceutical industry heading globally?

The industry is simultaneously pursuing three macro-objectives:

A) Increased specialization;A function of the complex and highly technical nature of virtually all aspects of the discovery, development, manufacturing and marketing of pharmaceutical products.

B) Global consolidation;A function of economies of scale, eliminating redundancies, reducing costs, streamlining operations, garnering larger shares of emerging markets, and monopolizing intellectual property.

C) Bio-integration;A function of the growing potential for natural and/or engineered biological systems (e.g., botanical, microbial, mammalian cell cultures, etc.) to produce economic (large-scale, low-cost) quantities of active pharmaceutical ingredients or their intermediates, particularly (though not exclusively) those involving novel targets and/or peculiar disease states.

Page 68: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

68

What are the key determining factors that will affect the future structure?

The key determining factors will include:A) managed care, formularies, and the worldwide trend toward socialized medicine;

B) the growth of generics;

C) D-T-C advertising and more, better brand management and marketing;

D) the availability of capital;

E) better drug delivery;

Page 69: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

69

What are the key determining factors that will affect the future structure? (continued)

The key determining factors will (also) include:

F) biotechnology;

G) economic geography;

H) improved chemical engineering, industrial processes, and better yields;

I) new forms of leadership, and superior managerial ability;

J) patent and tax reform, other legal inducements or obstacles, and moral impediments.

Page 70: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

70

What impact will the future structure have on planning needs and functions?

The impact on planning needs and functions will be largely four-fold:

A) a need for better methods of monitoring, analyzing, and interpreting emergent and potential new innovations;

B) a need for increased quality of communication with and paradigm sharing among firms and operating units that represent various areas of specialization within the organization or channel of distribution;

C) a need for generalists with broad backgrounds and experiences to understand and manage the growing herds of “cat-like” specialization and entrepreneurship that will continue to characterize the industry;

D) a need for better methods of conceptualizing and operationalizing the consolidation and integration of discovery, development, manufacturing, and marketing processes in order to minimize price.

Page 71: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

71

Patent Expirations – Pre-2002-2004Global Sales 2000-2001 (in MILLIONS of $USD)

Year Brand Sales Manufacturer Therapeutic ClassPre-2002 Premarin 2,074 Wyeth Estrogen Prozac 1,990 Lilly Antidepressant Allegra 1,577 Aventis Antihistaminic Taxol 1,197 Bristol-Myers Squibb Antineoplastic Neoral 1,084 Novartis Immunosuppressant Humulin 1,061 Lilly Antidiabetic Vasotec 1,050 Merck Antihypertensive 2002 Prilosec 5,684 AstraZeneca Antiulcerative Clarit in 3,267 Schering-Plough Antihistaminic Glucophage 2,682 Bristol-Myers Squibb Antidiabetic Augmentin 2,047 GlaxoSmithKline Antibacterial Intron 1,447 Schering-Plough Antiviral/Antineoplastic Priniv il 1,260 Merck Antihypertensive Zestril 1,097 AstraZeneca Antihypertensive 2003 Cipro 1,758 Bayer Antibacterial Neurontin 1,751 Pfizer Anticonvulsant Plavix 1,350 Sanofi-Synthelabo Antithrombotic Flovent 1,318 GlaxoSmithKline Antiallergic Advair 1,224 GlaxoSmithKline Antiasthmatic Celexa 1,087 Forest Antidepressant Levaquin 1,052 Ortho-McNeil Antibacterial Rocephin 1,006 Roche Antibacterial 2004 Procrit 3,430 Ortho Biotech Hematinic Epogen 2,108 Amgen Hematinic Lovenox 1,301 Aventis Antithrombotic Diflucan 1,066 Pfizer Antifungal

Page 72: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

72

Patent Expirations – 2005-2007 Global Sales 2000-2001 (in MILLIONS of $USD)

Year Brand Sales Manufacturer Therapeutic Class

2005 Zocor 6,670 Merck Antihyperlipidemic

Prevacid 2,951 TAP Antiulcerative

Zoloft 2,366 Pfizer Antidepressant

Novolin 1,829 Novo Nordisk Antidiabetic

Zithromax 1,506 Pfizer Antibacterial

Biaxin 1,159 Abbott Antibacterial

2006 Norvasc 3,582 Pfizer Antihypertensive

Paxil 2,674 GlaxoSmithKline Antidepressant

Pravachol 2,173 Bristol-Myers Squibb Antihyperlipidemic

Melavotin 1,621

Oxycontin 1,486 Purdue Analgesic (narcotic)

Neupogen 1,364 Amgen Hematopoietic Stimulant

Imigran 1,092 GlaxoSmithKline Antimigraine

2007 Risperdal 1,845 Janssen Antipsychotic

Fosamax 1,760 Merck Bone Resorption Inhibitor

Effexor 1,542 Wyeth Antidepressant

TOTAL 81,588

Page 73: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

73

Evolution of Pharmaceutical Science

1900 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030

Aspirin, Sulfa drugs,Penicillins

PsychotropicsNSAIDS

H2-antagonists,Beta blockers

Lipid lowerers,ACE inhibitors

Biotech drugs

ChronicDegenerative Disease, Cancer, Inflammation

Natural products& derivatives

Serendipity

Receptors

Enzymes

Genetic engineering

Cell pharmacology,Molecular biology

Page 74: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

74

Two Types of Radical Innovations - 1

1. Those that result in new industries or new subsectors of an existing industry:

Smallpox vaccine (1796);

Morphine, 1st alkaloid (1806);

Carbolic acid (phenol), 1st antiseptic (1860);

Phenazone (Antipyrin), 1st synthetic drug (1884);

Arsphenamine (Salvarsan), 1st chemotherapeutic agent (1911);

Sulfamidochrysoidine (Prontosil), 1st antibacterial (1935);

Penicillin, 1st antibiotic (1942);

Process for recombinant DNA, beginning of biotechnology (1975).

Page 75: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

75

Two Types of Radical Innovations - 2

2. Those that widen the scope and markets of existing sectors or subsectors by applying new scientific principles, technology, or materials to displace existing products or processes; and serve as models for further innovation by imitation:

Barbital (Veronal), 1st barbiturate hypnotic (1903) – 32 imitations;

Chlorothiazide (Diuril), 1st antihypertensive diuretic (1958) – 15 i’s;

Chlordiazepoxide (Librium), 1st benzodiazepine anxiolytic (1960) – 37 i’s;

Propranolol (Inderal), 1st antihypertensive ß-blocker (1964) – 24 i’s;

Cimetidine (Tagamet), 1st treatment for peptic ulcers (1977) – 7 i’s.

Page 76: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

76

Incremental Innovation

The preeminent vehicle for diffusing innovation among competing companies.

Can be big money makers.

Designed on models of existing products or processes with only modest differences in science, technology, materials, etc.; and do not provide scope for further innovation by imitation.

Trifluoperazine (Stelazine), tranquilizer (1959);

Cefaclor (Ceclor), antibacterial (1979);

Enalapril (Vasotec), ACE inhibitor (1985);

Ranitidine (Zantac), antiulcer (1982);

Atorvastatin (Lipitor) cholesterol reducer (1997).

Page 77: The Past, Present and Future Structure of the North American

77

Chemical Genetics

The systematic use of small molecules to explore biology.Transition from ad hoc or “targeted” organic synthesis.Biological space – region of multidimensional, biological descriptor space, e.g., specific diseases (cancer, diabetes) or areas of biology having common characteristics, e.g., cell-cycle check points. Chemical space – region of multidimensional, chemical descriptor space, “analogs;” i.e., molecules having similar overall properties (volume, charge, number of bonds with low barriers to rotation, etc.)