Upload
norah
View
51
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The oceans, uncertainty, and climate prediction. Jochem Marotzke Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M) Centre for Marine and Atmospheric Sciences Hamburg, Germany. Outline. Ocean heat capacity and climate sensitivity Extreme climate states Seamless prediction of weather and climate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The oceans, uncertainty, and climate prediction
Jochem Marotzke
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M)
Centre for Marine and Atmospheric Sciences
Hamburg, Germany
2
Outline
1. Ocean heat capacity and climate sensitivity
2. Extreme climate states
3. Seamless prediction of weather and climate
4. Examples of decadal climate prediction
5. Ocean observations and decadal prediction
3
Ocean heat capacity and climate sensitivity
Determining climate sensitivity from the instrumental records of radiative forcing, surface temperature, and ocean heat uptake (Gregory et al. 2002):
Schwartz (2007), concluding that climate sensitivity is small, by estimating very short climate response timescales (plus ocean heat capacity) drew 4 comments in one year
4
Time-dependent global energy balance model (1)
C: heat capacity per unit area
T: global mean (surface) temperature in CS: total solar output (aka “solar constant”)
albedo (assumed fixed for simplicity)
A in W/m2, B in W/(m2K): linearised LW parameterisation
Steady state:
F: forcing; : climate sensitivity
14
dT SC A BTdt
1 14
ST B A F
1T F B
1dTC F Tdt
5
Time-dependent global energy balance model (2)
Now: Add perturbation in forcing, F:
Initial condition: – steady state
: Adjustment timescale, proportional to both heat capacity and climate sensitivity
independent of heat capacity
Short-term evolution independent of climate sensitivity
1dTC F F Tdt
0T F
0 1 2tT t T F e
C
2 0 tT t T F
2 : 0 3F
t T t T F t tC
6
Time-dependent global energy balance model (3)
Short-term behaviour equivalent to only considering the first term on the rhs of (1) – change in LW radiation due to changing temperature unimportant in energy balance.
Feedback determining final equilibrium has not yet set in. Possibilities for heat capacity (→ adjustment time for
climate sensitivity of 0.75 K / (W m-2); 3 K for 2x CO2): Mixed layer (50m) → 5 years Thermocline (400m) → 40 years Whole ocean (4000m) → 400 years
Assumption: mixed as a “slab” (will return to that)
0 1 ; : 0 3dT F
C F T t T t T t T tdt C
3 : 0dT t
t C F F T t Tdt
7
Time-dependent global energy balance model (4)
8
Time-dependent global energy balance model (5)
Estimate effective climate sensitivity from the instrumental record:
Problem: for t<<, we had established earlier that in (1) the two first terms balance – the perturbation forcing goes entirely into storage
In (4), the denominator is the small difference of two large terms, of order t/.
If both effective heat capacity and climate sensitivity are large, there is little hope to obtain the needed accuracy from observations (cf., formal inclusions of infinite heat capacity within error bounds of Gregory et al. 2002)
Doubtful that response to volcanic eruptions gives any constraint on climate sensitivity
0 01 (4)
T T T TdTC Fdt F C dT dt
9
Multiple time scales (1)
Problem with reasoning so far: there is clear evidence that ocean heat uptake exhibits multiple timescales; e.g., ECBilt-CLIO (Knutti et al. 2008)
4xCO2 for 5 years
2xCO2 for 200 years
50 years
5 years
10
Multiple time scales (2) Consider 3-layer system
Mixed layer (ML, DML ~ 50 m),
Thermocline (TC, DTC ~ 400 m)
Deep ocean (DO, DD ~ 4000 m)
Coupling mixed layer – thermocline: Ekman pumping wE ~ 10-6 ms-1
Effects timescale in ML of ks-1 ~ DML/ wE ~ 1.5 y
Effects timescale in TC of ks-1 DTC/ DML ~ 13 y
Coupling thermocline – deep ocean: Meridional Overturning Circulation (MOC) wD ~ 30 x 106 m3s-1/ 3 x 1014 m2 ~ 10-7 ms-1
Effects timescale in TC of kTC-1 ~ DTC/ wD ~ 130 y
Effects timescale in DO of kTC-1 DD/ DTC ~ 1300 y
Timescale separation both in heat capacities (ML, TC, DO) and in coupling processes (Ekman, MOC in TC)
11
Multiple time scales (3) Heat conservation for perturbations from equilibrium:
All initial temperature perturbations are zero. Steady state:
5S SS S TC
S S
dT TFk T T
dt C C
6TC SS S TC TC TC D
TC
dT Dk T T k T T
dt D
7TCDTC TC D
D
DdTk T T
dt D
; S TCS TC D S S TC TC
TC D
D DD D D k k k k
D D
S TC DT T T F
12
Multiple time scales (4) Let us consider the first few decades; the deep ocean
has not changed yet; assume we can completely ignore it Only ML-TC interactions
ML responds quickly, by giving off heat to TC (timescale 1.5 y) and perhaps more slowly by LW radiation (timescale 2-7 years, depending on )
Combined timescale shorter than set by LW radiation
One must not interpret timescale as related to .
5S SS S TC
S S
dT TFk T T
dt C C
6TC SS S TC
TC
dT Dk T T
dt D
1S
SS S
C
C k
13
Multiple time scales (5) Before TC can respond much, ML has equilibrated to
additional forcing F and heat loss to TC
While TC is still near zero, ML response is considerably smaller than final equilibrium response F
TC will then warm up, on its own timescale ML will warm alongside TC, on the TC timescale Same reasoning holds for interactions across all of ML,
TC, DO. Specifically, ML will warm as deep ocean warms, because reduced vertical T difference implies reduced vertical heat flux more upward LW radiation required for balance, implying ML warming.
5S SS S TC
S S
dT TFk T T
dt C C
1S S TC
SS S
F C k TT
C k
14
ECHAM5/MPI-OM, CO2 quadrupling over 2000 y
(Chao Li, PhD thesis in progress, MPI-M)
15
Ocean heat capacity and climate sensitivity
Implications for determining climate sensitivity from the instrumental records of radiative forcing, surface temperature, and ocean heat uptake (accepting 3-layer structure): If one wants to argue that the short timescale of the
surface layer is applicable for estimating what is short-term, one must take into account both lengthening of timescale by exchange with thermocline and role of mixed layer-thermocline exchange in heat budget
Alternatively, one needs to argue with thermocline heat capacity, and adjustment timescale is large
16
Conceptual issues: extreme climates
PETM: Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum (55 million years before present): Extreme greenhouse effect
Snowball Earth: Fully glaciated state (Neoproterozoic, 700 million years ago)
Either case poses fundamental conceptual questions, but is also an extreme test for model’s capability
Either case has exposed limitations of model formulation and/or implementation (Malte Heinemann, PhD thesis at MPI-M on PETM; Aiko Voigt, PhD thesis at MPI-M on Snowball Earth)
17
Paleocene/Eocene simulation
ECHAM5/MPI-OM (Heinemann et al. 2009; PhD thesis in progress, MPI-M)
18
Snowball Earth? (ECHAM5/MPI-OM, No Sun)
Marotzke and Botzet (2007)
19
Snowball Earth? (ECHAM5/MPI-OM)
TSI = 0.01 %
TSI = 100 %
TSI = 100 %, CO2 = 10 x pre-industrial
TSI = 100 %, CO2 = 100 x pre-industrial
Global sea ice area [1013 m2]
Marotzke and Botzet (2007)
20
Snowball Earth? (ECHAM5/MPI-OM)
Voigt and Marotzke (2009; PhD thesis in progress,
MPI-M)
21
A curious apparent paradox…
We confidently predict weather one week into the future…
We confidently state that by 2100, anthropogenic global warming will be easily recognisable against natural climate variability…(cf., IPCC simulations)
Yet we make no statements about the climate of the year 2015
22
Two types of predictions
Edward N. Lorenz (1917–2008)
Predictions of the 1st kind Initial-value problem Weather forecasting Lorenz: Weather forecasting
fundamentally limited to about 2 weeks
Predictions of the 2nd kind Boundary-value problem IPCC climate projections
(century-timescale) No statements about
individual weather events Initial values considered
unimportant; not defined from observed climate state
23
Can we merge the two types of prediction?
John von Neumann wrote in 1955: “The approach is to try first short-range forecasts, then long-range forecasts of those properties of the circulation that can perpetuate themselves over arbitrarily long periods of time....and only finally to attempt forecasts for medium-long time periods.”
24
Seamless prediction of weather and climate
Combination of predictions of first and second kind – start from observed climate state; include change in concentrations of greenhouse gases and aerosols
Already practiced in seasonal climate prediction (El Niño forecasts)
In decadal prediction, anthropogenic climate change and natural variability expected to be equally important
Atmosphere loses its “memory” after two weeks – any predictability beyond two weeks residing in initial values must arise from slow components of climate system – ocean, cryosphere, soil moisture…
25
Seamless prediction of weather and climate
Data assimilation & initialisation techniques (developed in weather & seasonal climate prediction) must be applied to ocean, cryosphere, soil moisture
Also “imported” from seasonal climate prediction: building of confidence (“validation”) of prediction system, by hindcast experiments (retroactive predictions using only the information that would have been available at the time the prediction would have been made)
Can the frequent verification of shorter-term forecasts help in diagnosing and eliminating model errors?
26
Examples of decadal climate prediction
Differences arise from models used, but mainly (?) from the method by which the ocean component of coupled model is initialised:
1. “Optimal interpolation” (Hadley Centre, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts)
2. Forcing of sea surface temperature (SST) in coupled model toward observations (IFM-GEOMAR & MPI-M)
3. Using 4-dimensional ocean synthesis (ECCO) to initialise ocean component (MPI-M & UniHH)
27Smith et al. (2007)
Hadley Centre: Global-mean surface temperature
28
IFM-GEOMAR/MPI-M: Correlation of 10-y mean SAT
Keenlyside
et al. (2008)
29
IFM-GEOMAR/MPI-M: 10-y mean global mean SAT
Keenlyside et al. (2008)
30
MPI-M/UniHH SAT anomaly correlation w/ obs.
20C (“free” coupled model) Hindcasts, year 1
Hindcasts, year 10Hindcasts, year 5
Pohlmann et al. (2009)
Initialisation from GECCO 4D-Var ocean assimilation
31
HadISST (Obs.)
Ocean Assimilation
Hindcasts
20C (“Free” coupled model)
MPI-M/UniHH : North Atlantic SST
Annual
Pentadal
Decadal
Pohlmann et al. (2009)
32
MPI-M/UniHH : North Atlantic SST
HadISST (Obs.)
Forecasts
Scenario run (“Free” coupled model)
Pohlmann et al. (2009)
33
Organisation of decadal prediction (WCRP)
Decadal prediction is a vibrant effort if one considers the focus on Ocean initialisation Atlantic
We need to develop broader scope concerning Areas other than the Atlantic Roles in initialization of:
Cryosphere Soil moisture Stratosphere
The science of coupled data assimilation & initialisation has not been developed yet
34
Ocean observations and decadal prediction
Initialisation of ocean component of coupled models is the most advanced initialisation aspect of decadal prediction
Yet, methodological uncertainties are huge Example: Meridional Overturning Circulation
(MOC) in the Atlantic Take-home message: Comprehensive and
long-term in-situ and remotely-sensed observations are crucial
35
North Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation
Quadfasel (2005)
(a.k.a. Thermohaline Circulation)
36
Bryden et al. (2005)
ECMWF
MOC at 25N in ocean syntheses (GSOP)
37
Monitoring the Atlantic MOC at 26.5°N (Marotzke, Cunningham, Bryden, Kanzow, Hirschi, Johns, Baringer, Meinen, Beal)
Data recovery :
April, May, Oct. 2005; March, Mai, Oct., Dec. 2006, March, Oct 2007, March, November 2008
Church (SCIENCE, 17. August 2007)
38
Monitoring the Atlantic MOC at 26.5°N (Marotzke, Cunningham, Bryden, Kanzow, Hirschi, Johns, Baringer, Meinen, Beal)
39 S. A. Cunningham et al., Science (17 August
2007)
Observed MOC time series, 26.5N Atlantic
MOC
Florida Current
Ekman
Geostro-phic
upper mid-
ocean
40
Modelled vs. observed MOC variability at 26.5N
ObservationsECCO (Ocean Synthesis)ECHAM5/MPI-OM
RMS variability
Correlation
Baehr et al. (2009)
41
Statistics
Gulf Stream +31.9 ± 2.8 Sv
MOC +18.8 ± 5.0 Sv
Ekman + 3.3 ± 3.5 Sv
Upper Mid-Ocean-16.3 ± 3.0 Sv
Uncertainty in 2.5 year MOC mean: 1.9 Sv; assuming 18 DOF, 1.5 Sv measurement error
Observed MOC time series, 26.5N Atlantic
Kanzow et al. (2009,
in preparatio
n)
42
Observed MOC spectrum at 26.5N Atlantic
Ekman Transport dominates intra-seasonal variability Upper Mid-Ocean and Gulf Stream dominate seasonal
variability
Kanzow et al. (2009,
in preparatio
n)
43
Seasonal Cycle
Gulf Stream 1.5 Sv (14 %)
MOC 4.2 Sv (37 %)
Ekman 1.4 Sv (08%)
Upper Mid-Ocean2.1 Sv (26 %)
Observed seasonal MOC variability
MOC seasonal cycle emerging, but not significant, yet (at 5 % error probability)
Kanzow et al. (2009,
in preparatio
n)
44
Decomposition of mid-ocean transport
Western vs. eastern boundary contributions to mid-ocean transport (assuming time-invariant Gulf Stream and Ekman transports)
Both western and eastern boundaries contribute O(±2 Sv)
45
Seasonal cycle of mid-ocean transport
Pronounced seasonality from eastern boundary (Maria Paz Chidichimo, PhD thesis MPI-M)
Seasonal cycle less well established at western boundary
46
Very likely that better conceptual models are needed to estimate climate sensitivity from the instrumental record
Investigation of extreme climates is useful in developing conceptual understanding and in discovering model limitations
Climate prediction up to a decade in advance is possible, as shown by predictive skill of early, relatively crude efforts; might help reduce model errors relevant to uncertainty in climate sensitivity
Sustained (operational-style) observations crucial for climate prediction
Conclusions and outlook
Thank you for your attention