1
The NSCL is funded in The NSCL is funded in part by the National part by the National Science Foundation and Science Foundation and Michigan State Michigan State University. University. RIA R&D is funded in RIA R&D is funded in part by the U.S. part by the U.S. Department of Energy and Department of Energy and Michigan State Michigan State University. University. Design Studies for the RIA Fragment Design Studies for the RIA Fragment Separators Separators A.M. Amthor 1,2 , D.J. Morrissey 1,3 , A. Nettleton 1,2 , B.M. Sherrill 1,2 , A. Stolz 1 , O. Tarasov 1 1 National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 3 Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University Motivation Fragment separators focus and purify the multi-constituent beams which result from a primary beam striking a production target. The effectiveness of the system is determined by: • Angular acceptance limits ions passed according to lab-frame trajectories from the target. • Momentum acceptance limits ions passed according to deviation from central magnetic rigidity (Bρ = p/q). • Dispersion (d [x|δ]) defines spatial separation according to momentum deviation. Resolving power (R = d/Mx o ) quantifies the system’s ability to separate fragments—given an initial beam spot size of x o —and depends on the dispersion and the magnification (M [x|x], the dependence of the final beam spot size on the initial spot size). • Bending strength limits the magnetic rigidity of ions that can be sent down the system’s optic axis. RIA Momentum Compensator RIA Preseparator The high intensity of beams produced by the RIA linac combined with broad momentum distributions emerging from thick production targets make the design of the fragment separators challenging. Challenges: • Large angular and momentum acceptances, significant higher order aberrations (5 th order or higher) • Power on beam dump, up to 200kW to be collected • Primary beam proximity to desired fragments, very often within momentum acceptance and sometimes with |δ |< 1% • Higher energy and greater neutron excess of fragment beams, requires bending strength of 10Tm • Range compressed fragments to be stopped in 0.5 atm-m gas cell, requires aberrations < 2mm • Preseparator o 100 mr in horizontal and vertical o 12% momentum acceptance o low optical aberrations (< 2 mm) The large momentum acceptance of the preseparator produces a beam of the desired fragment with up to a 12% spread in momentum. This corresponds to a similarly large range distribution in He gas, roughly 50 atm-m FWHM. To maximize collection efficiency, the width of the range distribution must be minimized. The momentum compensator performs this function, known as range compression, by dispersing the beam then passing the particles through a monochromatic wedge degrader. The width of the range distribution is thereby reduced to a minimum primarily determined by the range straggling of the ions in the degrader material. The first order symmetry of the preseparator gives angular magnification equal to one, and any degrader materials present will be profiled to preserve achromaticity. Therefore, the angular and momentum acceptances must be identical to those of the preseparator itself. Aberrations in the preseparator will increase the initial spot size for the momentum compensator, but with d/M 2.5m (satisfied by current designs in first order), a spot size of 2.5mm will give R = 1000, at which point the limited optical resolution contributes little to the final range distribution. Specifications: • Full angular and momentum acceptance from preseparator • Momentum resolving power R>1000 • d/M = 2.5m H i g h - R e s o l u t i o n S e p a r a t o r L a r g e - A c c e p t a n c e S e p a r a t o r The RIA baseline concept above makes use of two fragment separators. • High-Resolution Separator o 80 mr in horizontal and vertical o 6% momentum acceptance o d/M 2.5m RIA Fragment Separation - e.g. the A1900 at the NSCL Range Compression Maximum stopping efficiency in the 0.5 atm-m He gas cell is achieved using a monochromatic wedge degrader followed by an adjustable thickness homogeneous degrader set so as to leave the peak of the compressed range distribution in the gas cell. In the MOCADI simulation at left a 32.4 atm-m FWHM range distribution of 130 Cd is brought to a range distribution with FWHM of 0.93 atm-m, leaving over 40% of fragments within the central 0.5 atm-m of the distribution. The goal at RIA is to provide very intense secondary beams of a wide variety of isotopes, many previously unavailable for use in experiments. At the RIA primary beam energies, secondary reactions in the target contribute to the overall production rate; hence it is desirable to use thick targets. This results in wide momentum distributions of the fragments. Figure 1 shows a representative example of the increased gain in yield from large separator momentum acceptances with the higher primary beam energies and thick targets to be used at RIA. Also, efficient collection of fission fragments requires larger angular acceptance, because of the energy released in the process. 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 5 10 15 20 M om entum Acceptance [% ] Yield [pps/p m A] 100 M eV/u 200 M eV/u 400 M eV/u 600 M eV/u 1000 M eV/u Figure 1: Fragment yield vs. momentum acceptance by primary beam energy for 78 Ni produced from 86 Kr. At the RIA energy of 400Mev/u the acceptance should be greater than 10%. N Z N Z N Z Fragments after target Fragments at wedge Fragments after FP Slits H. Weick et al., NIM B 164-165 (2000) 168 Specifications max = 6Tm Δp = 5% Δθ = ±40mr Δφ = ±50mr Compensated to 3 rd order Largest acceptance of current facilities Note: Isotope yield diagrams are from 86 Kr 78 Ni simulation with primary beam of 140MeV/u References: H. Geissel et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A 282 (1989) 247 C. Scheidenberger et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B 204 (2003) 119 L. Weissman et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A 522 (2004) 212 B. M. Sherrill, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B 204 (2003) 765 K. Shepard et al, in: B. Rusnak (Ed.), Proc. of 9 th Intl. Conf. on RF Superconductivity, Sante Fe, 1999, LANL, Los Alamos, 2000, p.345 P.N. Ostroumov, Phys. Rev. ST Acc. Beams 5 (2002) 030101. D.J. Morrissey et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B 204 (2003) 90 Targe t Beam Fragment Separator All Experiments A1900: single separator (up to 5 kW) Beam Preseparator High- Resolution Separator High-Energy Area Beam Preseparator Momentum Compensator Gas-Stopping Cell RIA: two distinct separators (up to 400 kW) NSCL Beam Target Wedge Isotope Slits Beam Dump The compensated third order system passes approximately 73% of fragments uniformly distributed in a 6-D phase space ellipse with a and b from ±50mr and with δ distributed over a full width of 12%.

The NSCL is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and Michigan State University. RIA RD is funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The NSCL is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and Michigan State University. RIA RD is funded in part by the U.S. Department of Energy

The NSCL is funded in part by The NSCL is funded in part by the National Science the National Science Foundation and Michigan Foundation and Michigan State University.State University.

RIA R&D is funded in part by RIA R&D is funded in part by the U.S. Department of the U.S. Department of Energy and Michigan State Energy and Michigan State University.University.

Design Studies for the RIA Fragment Design Studies for the RIA Fragment SeparatorsSeparators

A.M. Amthor 1,2, D.J. Morrissey 1,3, A. Nettleton 1,2, B.M. Sherrill 1,2, A. Stolz 1, O. Tarasov 1

1National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, 3Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University

Motivation

Fragment separators focus and purify the multi-constituent beams which result from a primary beam striking a production target. The effectiveness of the system is determined by:• Angular acceptance limits ions passed according to lab-frame trajectories from the target.• Momentum acceptance limits ions passed according to deviation from central magnetic rigidity (Bρ = p/q).• Dispersion (d [x|δ]) defines spatial separation according to momentum deviation.• Resolving power (R = d/Mxo) quantifies the system’s ability to separate fragments—given an initial beam spot size of xo—and depends on the dispersion and the magnification (M [x|x], the dependence of the final beam spot size on the initial spot size).• Bending strength limits the magnetic rigidity of ions that can be sent down the system’s optic axis.

RIA Momentum Compensator

RIA PreseparatorThe high intensity of beams produced by the RIA linac combined with broad momentum distributions emerging from thick production targets make the design of the fragment separators challenging. Challenges:• Large angular and momentum acceptances, significant higher order aberrations (5th order or higher)• Power on beam dump, up to 200kW to be collected• Primary beam proximity to desired fragments, very often within momentum acceptance and sometimes with |δBρ|< 1%• Higher energy and greater neutron excess of fragment beams, requires bending strength of 10Tm• Range compressed fragments to be stopped in 0.5 atm-m gas cell, requires aberrations < 2mm

• Preseparatoro 100 mr in horizontal and verticalo 12% momentum acceptanceo low optical aberrations (< 2 mm)

The large momentum acceptance of the preseparator produces a beam of the desired fragment with up to a 12% spread in momentum. This corresponds to a similarly large range distribution in He gas, roughly 50 atm-m FWHM. To maximize collection efficiency, the width of the range distribution must be minimized. The momentum compensator performs this function, known as range compression, by dispersing the beam then passing the particles through a monochromatic wedge degrader. The width of the range distribution is thereby reduced to a minimum primarily determined by the range straggling of the ions in the degrader material.The first order symmetry of the preseparator gives angular magnification equal to one, and any degrader materials present will be profiled to preserve achromaticity. Therefore, the angular and momentum acceptances must be identical to those of the preseparator itself. Aberrations in the preseparator will increase the initial spot size for the momentum compensator, but with d/M 2.5m (satisfied by current designs in first order), a spot size of 2.5mm will give R = 1000, at which point the limited optical resolution contributes little to the final range distribution.

Specifications:• Full angular and momentum acceptance from preseparator• Momentum resolving power R>1000• d/M = 2.5m

High-Resolution Separator

Large-Acceptance Separator

The RIA baseline concept above makes use of two fragment separators. • High-Resolution Separator

o 80 mr in horizontal and vertical o 6% momentum acceptanceo d/M 2.5m

RIA Fragment Separation - e.g. the A1900 at the NSCL

Range CompressionMaximum stopping efficiency in the 0.5

atm-m He gas cell is achieved using a monochromatic wedge degrader followed by an adjustable thickness homogeneous degrader set so as to leave the peak of the compressed range distribution in the gas cell. In the MOCADI simulation at left a 32.4 atm-m FWHM range distribution of 130Cd is brought to a range distribution with FWHM of 0.93 atm-m, leaving over 40% of fragments within the central 0.5 atm-m of the distribution.

The goal at RIA is to provide very intense secondary beams of a wide variety of isotopes, many previously unavailable for use in experiments. At the RIA primary beam energies, secondary reactions in the target contribute to the overall production rate; hence it is desirable to use thick targets. This results in wide momentum distributions of the fragments. Figure 1 shows a representative example of the increased gain in yield from large separator momentum acceptances with the higher primary beam energies and thick targets to be used at RIA. Also, efficient collection of fission fragments requires larger angular acceptance, because of the energy released in the process.

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 5 10 15 20

Momentum Acceptance [%]

Yie

ld [p

ps/p

mA

] 100 MeV/u200 MeV/u400 MeV/u600 MeV/u1000 MeV/u

Figure 1: Fragment yield vs. momentum acceptance by primary beam energy for 78Ni produced from 86Kr. At the RIA energy of 400Mev/u the acceptance should be greater than 10%.

N

Z

N

Z

N

ZFragments after target

Fragments at wedge

Fragments after FP Slits

H. Weick et al., NIM B 164-165 (2000) 168

SpecificationsBρmax = 6TmΔp = 5%Δθ = ±40mrΔφ = ±50mrCompensated to 3rd orderLargest acceptance of current facilities

Note: Isotope yield diagrams are from 86Kr78Ni simulation with primary beam of 140MeV/u

References: H. Geissel et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A 282 (1989) 247C. Scheidenberger et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B 204 (2003) 119L. Weissman et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. A 522 (2004) 212B. M. Sherrill, Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B 204 (2003) 765

K. Shepard et al, in: B. Rusnak (Ed.), Proc. of 9th Intl. Conf. on RF Superconductivity, Sante Fe, 1999, LANL, Los Alamos, 2000, p.345P.N. Ostroumov, Phys. Rev. ST Acc. Beams 5 (2002) 030101.D.J. Morrissey et al., Nucl. Inst. and Meth. B 204 (2003) 90

TargetBeam Fragment

SeparatorAll Experiments

A1900: single separator(up to 5 kW)

Beam Preseparator High-Resolution Separator High-Energy

Area

Beam Preseparator Momentum Compensator Gas-Stopping

CellRIA: two distinct separators

(up to 400 kW)

NSCL

Beam

Target

Wedge

IsotopeSlits

BeamDump

The compensated third order system passes approximately 73% of fragments uniformly distributed in a 6-D phase space ellipse with a and b from ±50mr and with δ distributed over a full width of 12%.