Upload
anubiz2450
View
80
Download
6
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The North American Species of Anastatus Motschulsky (Hymenoptera, Eupelmidae)Author(s): B. D. BurksReviewed work(s):Source: Transactions of the American Entomological Society (1890-), Vol. 93, No. 4 (Dec., 1967),pp. 423-432Published by: American Entomological SocietyStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25077943 .Accessed: 02/11/2011 10:48
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
American Entomological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access toTransactions of the American Entomological Society (1890-).
http://www.jstor.org
THE NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF ANASTATUS MOTSCHULSKY (HYMENOPTERA, EUPELMIDAE)
By B. D. Burks
Entomology Research Division, Agriculture Research Service
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C.
Introduction
The genus Anastatus Motschulsky has never been revised for
North America, though a considerable amount of information has
been published on the biology of some of our species. Anastatus
disparis Ruschka was successfully introduced from Europe into
North America for biological control of the gypsy moth, Porthetria
dispar (L.), in the early years of this century (Clausen, 1956), and there is a very large literature about this species. A. tenuipes Bolivar y Pieltain, a successful parasite of the brown-banded
roach, Supella supellectilium (Serv.), which seems to have followed
its host unaided into the United States, has also accumulated a
rather extensive bibliography (Roth and Willis, 1960). Peck (1963) gives complete bibliographies for all the North
American species of Anastatus up to 1959; later references are in
Burks (1967). Since both these publications are readily avail
able, I have not repeated those citations in this paper. I do give
here, however, the original citation and a brief statement about
hosts and distribution for each species. Where necessary, I have
designated lectotypes from existing cotype series.
In Anastatus antigeny is very great. The males and females
bear little resemblance to each other, figs. 1,2. It is only possible to associate the two sexes through fortunate rearings that happen to produce both sexes under conditions that leave no doubts
about the association of the males and females. Also, the males are rare or absent in some species. As a result, I have had little
reliable male material with which to work and have had to base
the classification entirely on the females.
All the North American species of Anastatus are primary Qgg
parasites that usually develop in the eggs of Hemiptera, Orthop tera, or Lepidoptera. Some of these primary egg parasites may,
however, occasionally act as secondary parasites and develop in
(423)
TRANS. AMER. ENT. SOC, VOL. 93
424 NORTH AMERICAN ANASTATUS
braconid cocoons (Muesebeck and Dohanian, 1927).
North American Anastatus
Key to Females
1. Forewing with a pair of lateral white or hyaline triangles located
approximately at midpoint between base and apex of wing . 2
Forewing with a complete white or hyaline crossband located approxi
mately at midpoint between base and apex . 4
2. Sculpture on the prescutum much smoother than that on the scutellum
. mirabilis (Walsh & Riley)
Sculpture on the anterior sector of the prescutum almost as strong as
that on the scutel'um . 3
3. Posterior, concave portion of mesoscutum nearly smooth, not sculp
tured as is prescutum . pearsalli Ashmead
Posterior, concave portion of mesoscutum sculptured almost as
strongly as is prescutum . ruficollis (Cameron)
4. Ovipositor exserted one-fifth or more length of gaster . 5
Ovipositor not exserted, or tip barely visible . 6
5. White crossband of forewing located at apex of stigmal vein .
. gemmarii (Ashmead)
White crossband of forewing located near middle of marginal vein ....
. floridanus Roth & Willis
6. Scutellum and axillae very finely and granularly sculptured, fig. 6,
mostly or entirely dull, nonmetallic in color . 7
Scutellum and axil'ae more coarsely punctate, fig. 7, predominantly
metallic in color . 8
7. Ocellocular line equal to diameter of lateral ocellus; mesoscutum en
tirely metallic, with posterior, concave portion scu1ptured and hairy
. semiflavidus Gahan
Ocellocular line one-half diameter of lateral ocellus; mesoscutum
mostly tan, with concave portion smooth and bearing only a few
inconspicuous hairs . tenuipes Bolivar y Pieltain
8. Hyaline crossband of forewing broad, embracing more than half the
length of marginal vein, fig. 3 . reduvii (Howard)
Hyaline crossband narrower, as in figs. 4, 5, embracing less than half
the marginal vein . 9
9. Crossband of forewing strongly angled in the middle toward wing
base, fig. I; prescutum sculptured the same as is the scutellum .
. disparis Ruschka
Crossband of forewing almost or quite straight . 10
10. Vertex flattened, gradually sloping from posterior ocelli to occipital
margin; head viewed from in front obvious'y broader than high ....
. microcentri Gahan
B. D. BURKS 425
Vertex convex, not sloping evenly from ocelli to occipital margin; head viewed from in front only slightly or not at all broader than
high . 11 11. Ocellocular line shorter than diameter of lateral ocellus; gaster dark
with a light colored cross stripe near base and another at apex ...
. hirtus (Ashmead)
Ocellocular line equal to or longer than diameter of lateral
ocellus . 12
12. Hyaline crossband of forewing broad, fig. 4, embracing almost half
marginal vein; midtibia with two rows of short, stout spines at
apex, fig. 9 . mantis (Ashmead)
Hyaline crossband of forewing narrow, fig. 5, embracing only a third
the length of marginal vein; midtibia with one row of short, stout
spines at apex, fig. 8 . furnissi, new species
Anastatus disparis Ruschka (Figs. 1, 2)
Anastatus bifasciatus Howard and Fiske and other authors, not Fonsco
lombe.
Anastatus bifasciatus var. disparis Ruschka, 1920, Zool.-Bot. Ges. Wien.
Verh. 70: 265. Types in Nat. Hist. Mus., Vienna.
Anastatus disparis Ruschka, Bolivar y Pieltain, 1923, Rev. Fitopat. 1: 119.
Hosts. ? Eggs of Lymantriidae, Porthetria dispar (L.), Nygmia
phaeorrhoea (Don.); also cocoons of Apanteles spp. Distribution. ?
Japan; Western Europe; New England. Both sexes known, figs. 1, 2.
Anastatus drassi (Riley)
Eupelmus drassi Riley, 1892, in Howard, Proc. Ent. Soc. Wash. 2: 297.
Type, U. S. N. M. No. 1515.
Anastatus drassi (Riley), Dalla Torre, 1898, Cat. Hym., 5: 280.
Host. ? Originally thought to have been reared from the nest
of a spider, but the host material still preserved with the unique
type appears to be the cocoon of a dryinid wasp. Distribution. ? Known only from the type, from Kirkwood, Mo.
Female only known.
This species cannot now be placed in the species key from the
single fragmentary type specimen, but it may well not be an
Anastatus. Dalla Torre placed it in this genus only from the
literature. I have listed it here because all catalogs continue to
place it in this genus, and I am unable to place it elsewhere.
TRANS. AMER. ENT. SOC, VOL. 93
426 NORTH AMERICAN ANASTATUS
Anastatus floridanus Roth & Willis
Anastatus floridanus Roth & Willis, 1954, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc. 80: 31.
Holotype 9. ? U. S. N. M. No. 62211. Allotype 8 and 16
9 , 7 8 paratypes in type series.
Host. ? Egg case of roach, Eurycotis floridana (Walker).
Distribution. ?
Fla.
Both sexes known.
Anastatus furnissi new species (Figs. 5, 7, 8)
This species is most closely related to mantis (Ashmead), but
differs in having the crossband of the forewing narrower, in having
only 1 row of short, stout bristles at the apex of the midtibia, and
in having the ninth tergum rounded posteriorly, rather than tri
angular, as in mantis.
Length. ? 2.5 ? 3.0 mm. Head with faint bronze luster, antennal
scape tan, pedicel and flagellum dark brown to black; pronotum tan with
faint iridescent luster; mesoscutum black, showing faint iridescence pos
teriorly; scutellum and axillae strongly punctate, with strong metallic
coloration; mesopleuron tan posteriorly, shading to black anteriorly,
mesosternum black; propodeum black; legs dark brown with black shading on coxae and outer faces of femora and tibiae; forewing dark brown,
hyaline with white trichiae at base and on crossband, the latter located
just basal to stigmal vein; hindwing hyaline; gaster black with inconspicuous
pale spot on venter near base, apex of ovipositor yellow. Head, body, and
appendages clothed with short, white hair.
Each mandible with 2 ventral teeth of approximately equal size and a
dorsal truncation; a very short carina extending dorsally from lateral
margin of each antennal fossa, margin of scrobe cavity otherwise ecarinate;
scrobe cavity with semitransverse, lineolate aciculations, parascrobal areas
minutely alveolate. Ocellocular line and diameter of lateral ocellus equal.
Antennal scape slightly bowed, almost straight (not strongly bent at the
middle, as in mantis); pedicel one-fourth as long as scape, ring segment
one-fifth as long as pedicel; first 3 funiculars equal in length and each
slightly longer than pedicel; fourth and fifth funiculars equal and each
three-quarters as long as third; sixth and seventh equal in length, each
three-fifths as long as third; club 3 times as long as seventh funicular.
Median length of pronotum half as great as its width at posterior margin;
8 long bristles in a transverse row near posterior margin of pronotum.
Entire dorsal surface of mesoscutum dull and coriaceous; scute'lum and
axillae with dense, alveolate punctation; mesopleuron shining and with
short, dense hair anteriorly, subshining (faintly striate) and without
pubescence posteriorly. Postscutellum usually visible, smooth and shining.
B. D. BURKS 427
Each midtibia with a single row of short, stout spines at apex.
Propodeum smooth and shining, length at meson ha f that of propodeal
spiracle. Dorsal surface of gaster coriaceous; posterior margin of eighth
tergum incised slightly so as to expose the cerci borne by ninth tergum, the latter rounded and semi-arcuate in shape, with a median, terminal, semicircular incision at point where tips of ovipositor sheaths protrude
slightly.
Male. ?
Unknown.
Type locality. ?
Sisters, Oregon.
Holotype. ? U. S. N. M. No. 69366.
Described from 83 female specimens, as follows: Holotype and 1 paratype, Sisters, Oregon, June 8, 1959, reared from eggs of Coloradla pandora Blake, R. L. Furniss, Hopkins No. 33524-C; 4 paratypes, Corvallis, Oreg., May 13, 1946, K. R. Hobbs, col
lector; 77 paratypes, Corvallis, Oreg., April 18, 1947, reared from
eggs of Pseudohazis sp., K. R. Hobbs.
Hosts. ? Primary parasite of eggs of moths of the family
Saturniidae.
Anastatus gemmarii (Ashmead)
Eupelmus gemmarii Ashmead, 1886, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc., 13: 129.
Lectotype 9, U. S. N. M. No. 41238, labeled, "Jacksonville, Fla.,
Type, Eupelmus gemmarii Ashm." Present designation of lectotype. Six $ para ectotypes in type series.
Anastatus gemmarii (Ashmead), Peck in Muesebeck et al., 1951, U. S.
Dept. Agr., Monog. 2, p. 513.
Hosts. ? This was said to have been reared from the gall of
the cynipid Callirhytis gemmaria (Ashmead), but this rearing has
not been repeated in over 80 years. It may be incorrect.
Distribution. ? Known only from the type specimens from
Florida.
Female only known.
Anastatus hirtus (Ashmead)
Eupelmus hirtus Ashmead, 1885, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc, 12: Proc, p. xiv.
Lectotype $, U. S. N. M. No. 3024, labeled, "Jacksonville, Fla., Col
lection Ashmead, Eupelmus hirtus Ashm." Present designation of
lectotype. One $, 1 # paralectotypes in type series.
Anastatus hirtus (Ashmead), Peck in Muesebeck et al, 1951, TJ. S. Dept.
Agr., Monog. 2, p. 513.
TRANS. AMER. ENT. SOC, VOL. 93
428 NORTH AMERICAN ANASTATUS
Host. ? Eggs of pentatomid, Thy anta custator (?.).
Distribution. ? N. Y. south to Fla.
Both sexes known.
Anastatus mantis (Ashmead) (Fig. 4)
Eupelmus mantis Ashmead, 1883, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc, 12: Proc, p. xv.
Lectotype 9, U. S. N. M. No. 3023, labeled "Jacksonville, F:a., Col
lection Ashmead, From eggs of Mantis Carolina Ap/85, Eupelmus mantis Ashm." Present designation of lectotype. Two 9, 2 $ para
lectotypes in type series. All specimens fragmentary. Anastatus mantis (Ashmead), Peck in Muesebeck et al., 1951, U. S. Dept.
Agr., Monog. 2, p. 513.
Host. ?
Egg case of praying mantis, Stagmomantis Carolina
(Johan.). Distribution. ? Fla. and Gulf Coast north to Okla. and 111.
Both sexes known.
Anastatus microcentri Gahan
Anastatus microcentri Gahan, 1922, Proc. U. S. Nati. Mus., 61 (24): 12.
Holotype 9, U. S. N. M. No. 24987; also allotype $ and 5 9 para
types in type series.
Host. ? Eggs of katydid, Microcentrum sp.
Distribution. ?
Pa. and D. C. west to Kans., Tex., and Ariz.
Both sexes known.
Anastatus mirabilis (Walsh & Riley)
Antigaster mirabilis Wa'sh & Riley, 1869, Amer. Ent., 1: 156. Lectotype
9, U. S. N. M. No. 1539, labeled, "Antigaster mirabilis Walsh $."
Present designation of lectotype. Two 9, 2 $ paralectotypes in type
series.
Eupelmus (Antigastra) mirabilis (Walsh & Riley), Howard, 1880, Canad.
Ent, 12: 209.
Anastatus mirabilis (Walsh & Riley), Dalla Torre, 1898, Cat. Hym., 5: 280.
Hosts. ? Eggs of tree cricket, Oecanthus sp., praying mantids,
and several genera of Tettigoniidae; the pentatomids, Acrosternum
hilare (Say) and Brochymena sp., and a sphingid moth, Cressonia
juglandis (A. & S.). Some of these rearings should be repeated. Distribution.
? N. J. south to Fla., west to Kans. and Tex.
Both sexes known.
B. D. BURKS 429
Anastatus pearsalli Ashmead
Anastatus pearsalli Ashmead, 1898, Ent. News, 9: 24. Lectotype 9, U. S. N. M. No. 22878, labeled, "Brooklyn, N. Y., R. F. Pearsall, Ex
Smerinthus astylus, Aug. 20, 97, Anastatus pearsalli Ashm. 9 "
Present designation of lectotype. Two 9 paralectotypes in type series.
Hosts. ? Eggs of a sphingid, Paonias astylus (Dru.); Heterop
tera, Acrosternum hilare (Say), Archimerus alternat us (Say), Banasa dimidiata (Say); also cocoons of Apanteles sp.
Distribution. ? Mass, south to N. C, west to Wise, and Ark.
Both sexes known.
Anastatus reduvii (Howard) (Fig. 3)
Eupelmus reduvii Howard, 1880, Canad. Ent., 12: 207. Lectotype 9, U. S. N. M. No. 2668, labeled, "from eggs of Reduv. noven. 29.4.79, D. C, Eupelmus reduvii How." Present designation of lectotype. Three 9,3 8 paralectotypes in type series. All specimens frag
mentary. Anastatus reduvii (Howard), Waterston, 1923, Bui. Ent. Res., 14: 104.
Hosts. ? Eggs of Heteroptera, Acrosternum hilare (Say),
Anasa tristis (Degeer), Arilus cristatus (L.); Tettigoniidae, Micro
centrum sp.; Lepidoptera, Anisota sp., Estigmene acraea (Dru.),
Telea polyphemus Cr.; Ascalaphidae, Ululodes sp. Distribution. ? D. C. and Md. south to Fla., west to Kans. and
Tex.; West Indies, Central America, northern South America.
Both sexes known.
Anastatus ruficollis (Cameron)
Brasema ruficollis Cameron, 1905, Invert. Pacif., 1: 125. Location of type unknown. [Early records of this species from California published under the name mirabilis.]
Anastatus rugosicollis (!) Crawford, 1913, Proc. U. S. Nati. Mus., 46: 347.
Anastatus ruficollis (Cameron), Essig, 1926, Ins. West. N. Amer., p. 843.
Hosts. ? Eggs of Tettigoniidae, Microcentrum rhombifolium
(Sauss.), Scudderia furcata B. v. W., undet. katydids. Distribution. ? Calif.
Both sexes known.
Anastatus semiflavidus Gahan
Anastatus semiflavidus Gahan, 1914, Proc. U. S. Nati. Mus., 48: 160.
Lectotype 9, U. S. N. M. No. 18331, labeled, "Koehler, N. Mex.,
TRANS. AMER. ENT. SOC, VOL. 93
430 NORTH AMERICAN ANASTATUS
W. F. Schlupp Collector, Webster No. 5054, Cage No. 431, Anastatus
semiflavidus 9 Type Gahan." Present designation of lectotype. Eight
2,48 paralectotypes in type series.
Hosts. ? Eggs of Saturniidae, Hemileuca nevadensis Stretch,
H. oliviae Cockerell.
Distribution. ? Kans. and Tex. west to Calif. Both sexes known.
Anastatus tenuipes Bolivar y Pieltain (Fig. 6)
Anastatus tenuipes Bolivar y Pieltain, 1925, Bui. Soc. Roy. Ent. Egypte, 9:
43. Type originally in Alfieri Collection in Cairo, now U. S. N. M.
No. 69016. Species described from 1 female specimen. Anastatus blattidarum Ferri?re, 1930, Bul. Ent. Res., 21: 33. Types in
Brit. Mus. Species syn. by Roth and Willis, 1960, Smiths. Misc. Coll., 141: 246.
Host. ?
Egg cases of brown-banded roach, Supella supellec
tilium (Serv.). Distribution.
? Cosmopolitan.
Both sexes known, but males are rare.
This species, described from Egypt, followed its host into
the United States, first becoming established in Arizona about
1939 (Flock, 1941). It probably came in from Mexico, because
U. S. quarantine inspectors have continued to intercept it in ship ments crossing the Mexican border into the United States. A.
tenuipes has spread to practically all areas where its host is
established. It competes successfully with the encyrtid egg para
site, Comperia merceti (Compere), that also attacks the brown
banded roach.
Anastatus zeli (Ashmead)
Eupelmus zeli Ashmead, 1886, Trans. Amer. Ent. Soc, 13: 130. Type $,
U. S. N. M. No. 22879, labeled, "Jacksonville, Fla., Eupelmus zeli
Ashm., Ap. 85." Described from 2 $ specimens, one of which cannot
now be found. The one that remains is fragmentary.
Anastatus zeli (Ashmead), Peck in Muesebeck et al, 1951, U. S. Dept.
Agr., Monog. 2, p. 514.
Host. ? Eggs of reduviid, Zelus longipes (L.).
Distribution. ?
Fia.
Female only known.
B. D. BURKS 431
This species has not been reared again since it was described
80 years ago. At present, because of the remaining mutilated
type specimen, it cannot be placed with any certainty among the
other species of the genus. I have not designated this damaged
specimen as the lectotype of the species because, should the
missing cotype specimen be found at some later time, it might be
a more suitable specimen to be chosen as the lectotype.
Literature Cited
Burks, B. D. in K. V. Krombein and B. D. Burks, eds. 1967. Hymenop
tera of America North of Mexico, Synoptic Catalog, U. S. Dept. Agr.,
Monog. no. 2, Second Supplement, 584 p.
Clausen, C. P. 1956. Biological Control of Insect Pests, U. S. Dept.
Agr., Tech. Bull. 1139, 151 p.
Flock, R. A. 1941. Biological Control of the Brown-banded Roach,
Bull. Brookl. Ent. Soc. 36:1-4.
Muesebeck, C. F. W. and S. M. Dohanian. 1927. A Study of Hyper
parasitism, U. S. Dept. Agr. Dept. Bull. 1487, 36 p.
Peck, O. 1963. A Catalogue of the Nearctic Chalcidoidea, Can. Ent.
Supplement 30, 1092 p.
Roth, L. M. and E. R. Willis. 1960. The Biotic Association of Cock
roaches, Smiths. Misc. Coll. 141, 470 p.
TRANS. AMER. ENT. SOC, VOL. 93
Explanation of Figures
Plate 1
Figures 1-2. Dorsal aspect of the entire body of Anastatus disparis Ruschka. Fig. 1, female. Fig. 2, male.
Plate 2
Figures 3-9. Details of Anastatus species. Forewings. Fig. 3, A. reduvii
(Howard). Fig. 4, A. mantis (Ashmead). Fig. 5, A. furnissi n. sp. Dorsal aspect of the thorax, showing detail of sculpture of scutellum.
Fig. 6, A. tenuipes Bolivar y Pieltain. Fig. 7, A. furnissi n. sp. Apex of mid tibia (sp, tibial spur; ta, base of first tarsal segment). Fig. 8, A. furnissi n. sp. Fig. 9, A. mantis (Ashmead).
Plate 1
^^
?*
BURKS-ANASTATUS
Plate 2
18888* W3k9f
BURKS-ANASTATUS