Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Next Generation of Thanks May 22, 2012
ALLISON LEWIS LODHI, CFRE – Vice President, Consulting
Objectives
• Donors by the Generations
• Next Generation Giving Needs
• Building Lifelong Donor Relationships
• Putting it All Together
• Q&A
Myth Busters … Surprising Facts
•Email is the Most Popular Online Activity for all
•Average Social Networking Site User is age 37
•61% of Facebook Users, 64% of Twitter Users are over 35
•LinkedIn is Used Most by Boomers
•By Age 19, 6% of Gen X were Veterans, 24% of Matures
•TV is Still the Most Influential Advertising Channel for all
•Most Millennials Prefer Face to Face Solicitation
U.S. Digital Consumers
Source: Nielsen
Industry Realities
Development Professionals
•Dependence on Major Gifts
•Poor Pipeline Development
•Impatience with Strategy
•Diminished Lifetime Value
•Lost Dollars Compounded
•High Acquisition Costs
•Data Overload
Donors
•Age Demographics
•Consumer Behaviors
•Shrinking Attention-Span
•Diminished Lifetime Value
•Eroded Confidence in
NPOs to “Manage Well”
The Generations
Matures as Donors
Born: before 1945
U.S. Pop: 39M
Give: 79%
# Causes: 6.3
Avg Yr: $1.066
Channels
1st Heard: Mail (35%)
Receive: Mail, F2F
Give: Mail
Warren Buffet
Born 1930
Boomers as Donors
Born: 1946-1964
U.S. Pop: 78M
Give: 67%
# Causes: 5.2
Avg Yr: $901
Channels
1st Heard: Mail (19%)
Receive: Mail, Phone
Give: Mail, Web
Melinda & Bill Gates
Born 1964 & 1955
Gen X as Donors
Born: 1965-1980
U.S. Pop: 62M
Give: 58%
# Causes: 4.2
Avg Yr: $796
Give to
Accomplish Their Goals
Channels
1st Heard: Mail (16%)
Receive: Email
Give: Web, Peer, Mail
Angelina Jolie
Born 1975
Gen Y as Donors
Born 1981-1991
U.S. Population 51M
Give 56%
Causes Supported 3.6
Average Annual $341
Give to
Make a Difference in the World
Channels
1st Heard: WoM, Google
Receive: Email, IM, Text
Give: Web, F2F, Text
Mark Zuckerberg
Born 1984
Next Generation Giving Needs
Matures Generation
Copes Well With
•Tradition
•Practicality
•Anonymity
•Rules, Authority
Sensitivities
•Materialism
•Entitlement Mentality
•Are Indirect Communicators
Motivated By
•Loyalty, Dedication, Sacrifice
•Duty, Obedience
•Traditional Rewards
•Directive Leadership
Ways to Engage
•Rewards Reflecting Longevity
•Team Players – Groups,
Volunteering, Service
Matures Generation Stewardship
•Receipt: Paper, Straightforward, Tax File
•Thank You: Traditional Letter, Personal Note
•Annual Report: Print
•Recognition Event: Consider Spouse Role, Elite
•Tchotchke: Lasting, Practical (Waterford Crystal)
•Stewardship Report: Print, Simple, Effective, Leaders
•Feedback Loop: Ask in Person, Mail Survey
Boomers Generation
Copes Well With
•Team Orientation
•Big Picture
Sensitivities
•Does Not Respect Titles
•Absolutes, Structure
•Conflict
•Feedback about Self
Motivated By
•Personal Growth
•Fresh Perspectives
•Optimism
Ways to Engage
•Vision-Casting
•Seek Advice & Counsel
•Brainstorming
•Personal Growth
Opportunities
Boomers Generation Stewardship
•Receipt: Paper and Email, Humanized
•Thank You: Card, Colorful
•Annual Report: Print or Email, Big Picture Perspective
•Recognition Event: Traditional
•Tchotchke: No
•Stewardship Report: Impact, Results, Optimism
•Feedback Loop: Ask in Person, Phone Survey
Generation X
Copes Well With
•Tons of Information
•Change
•Technology
•Multi-Tasking
•Global Thinking
•Informal/Flexible
Sensitivities
•Environmentally conscious
•Promotions … done poorly
•Must have freedom
Motivated By
•Time for Leisure & Family
•Non-Traditional Rewards
•Training and Education
•Goals
Ways to Engage
•Projects, Lots to Do
•Volunteering
•Recognition (small)
•Fun Parties & Groups
•Giving Circles
•Promotions … done well
Generation X Stewardship
•Receipt: Auto-Responder, Email, Mail
•Thank You: Interactive
•Annual Report: Email, Update on Goals
•Recognition Event: Traditional
•Tchotchke: Non-Traditional
•Stewardship Report: Educational, Families
•Feedback Loop: Email Survey, Focus Groups
Generation Y
Copes Well With
•Tons of Information
•Fast Pace
•Structure & Flexibility
•Technology
•Sociability
•Diversity
•Multi-Tasking
•Tenacity
Sensitivities
•Anything Slow
•Dealing with Difficult People
Motivated By
•Empowerment
•Consumerism
•Heroism
•Constant Feedback
Ways to Engage
•Peers & Networking
•Collective Action
•Personal Relationships
•Virtual & Real Events
•Volunteering
•Make it all about “Me”
Generation Y Stewardship
•Receipt: Auto-Responder, Email, Direct Login
•Thank You: Interactive, Social Media Integration
•Annual Report: Email, Personalized, Collect Action
Progress Report
•Recognition Event: Virtual or Real, Social, Relaxed
•Tchotchke: Yes, Mission-Based
•Stewardship Report: Personalized, “You” Made it Possible
•Feedback Loop: Yes! Email, Social, Web Survey, Quiz
Lifelong Giving
Reaching Today’s Donor
• Alignment to Consumer Preferences
• Intuitive Response Mechanisms
• Intense Personalization
• Convenience and Options
• Behavioral Interest
Timing is Crucial
• Nonprofits lose access to engaged constituents over time
• A plan to react quickly is crucial to activating long term value
5 Keys to Donor Loyalty
1. Determine Donor Motivations & Shared Values
2. Manage Donor Satisfaction
3. Build Donor Commitment
4. Foster Trust
5. Maintain Regular Contact
1. Determine Motives & Shared Values
• Measure Satisfaction
• Active & Passive Data
• Surveys
• Focus Groups
• Generational Strategy
• Fundraising
• Stewardship
2. Manage Donor Satisfaction
• Set Expectations and Preferences Up Front
• Appropriate Welcome
• Communication Frequency, Timing, Preferences
• We Will Ask Again
• Establish Key Performance Indicators
• Donor LifeCycle™ Migration
• Cross-Channel Donor Movement
• Real Retention, Second Gift Conversion
• Provide Timely Thanks in Multiple Formats
• Personalize Everything
• Use Multi-Channel Tactics
• Present a Second Gift Opportunity within 60-90 Days
• Consider High-Value Sustaining Giver Program
3. Build Donor Commitment
• Meet the Expectations Set
• Welcome New Donors,
Provide Context
• Be Transparent and
Accessible
• Accept Feedback in Many
Formats, Act on It
4. Foster Trust
Welcome Series Example
ONE TWO THREE
• Provide Interactive Engagement Opportunities
• Communicate More Often with Donors
• Be Integrated, Cross-Channel
5. Maintain Regular Contact
STRATEGIC: Thoughtful and planned
CONSISTENT: Reflects a common message
INTEGRATED: Anticipates cross-channel
CONGRUENT: Leverages channel strengths
INTENTIONAL: Drives toward stated goals
Relationship Pathways Example
Use Cross-Channel and Leverage Rich Media (as appropriate)
Web Prospect
Capture Email Collect profile
data Welcome
series Initial
solicitation
New Donor
Thank you Welcome
series RFM
segmentation
Monthly giving
program
Event Participant
Thank you Coaching
series Post-event
stewardship
Next event early
registration
Putting It All Together
Building on Existing Plans
Existing Marketing Campaign Pursuant’s Integrated Campaign
Donor Intelligence & Personas
• Leverage Donor Behavior
• Predict Most-Likely-to-Give Prospects
• Allow Prioritization of Resources and Time
• Inform Business Rules for Moves Management
• Leverages All Communication Channels
Passive vs. Active
Passive Involvement
“It just happened through unsupervised thinking.”
• Inclusive. Wide Net. Generic.
• Analyzed in retrospective by aggregate/cohorts/segments
Data: RFM, rates (e.g. click-thrus, response) heat map
Active Engagement
“It was catalyzed into being (but I feel like it was my idea).”
• Exclusive. Prioritized. Specific. Intentional. Chosen.
• Analyzed in real-time or future by decision points/individuals.
Data: questioning, survey, face to face, 2-way conversation
Holistic Generational Strategy
DONOR INTELLIGENCE DONOR RELATIONS
• Better Donor and Prospect Prioritization
• Deeper, More Relevant Relationships
• Lowered Costs, Fewer Lost Opportunities
• Minimal Donor Frustration
• Empowered Supporters
• Improved Efficiency
• Compound Value of Future Gifts
Outcomes
10% Increased
Retention
=
Up to 200%
Increased Donor
Value
Sargeant & Jay 2004
No, Thanks
• New Donor Dollars Gained …
• All Lost Due to Poor Retention
• Donor Dollars Lost at Approx 3x Rate of
Recapture
53.5%
-55.4%
- 1.9%
CATEGORY TOTALS
New 21.7%
Recapture 12.4%
Upgrade 19.4%
All Gains Combined 53.5%
Downgrade -20.3%
Lapsed New -14.1%
Lapsed Repeat -21.0%
All Losses Combined -55.4%
Source: 2011 Fundraising Effectiveness Project, AFP International
Key Take-Aways
• Next Generation Giving Needs
• More engaging stewardship approaches
• Channels
• Peers
• 24/7 access, transparency
• Multiple gift-giving mediums
• Results, constant feedback
Key Take-Aways
Building Lifelong Donor Relationships Requirements
• Prioritize constituents and resources by KPIs
• Build on existing plans
• Achieve channel congruence and relevance
• Position stewardship as a catalytic driver of donor behavior
• Foster commitment through engagement
• Set and meet expectations
• Communication with relevance
Q&A
Allison Lewis Lodhi, CFRE
5151 Belt Line Rd., Suite 900
Dallas, TX 75254
317.841.0641 direct
317.361.5496 cell
www.pursuant.com
Resources & Thank You!
•Acri, Sue. (2009) Passing the Torch: Attracting and Cultivating the Next Generation of Philanthropist. Pursuant
Ketchum and Giving Institute.
•Bhagat, V., Loeb, P. and Rovner, M. (2010) Next Generation of American Giving. Convio, Edge Research and Sea
Change Strategies.
•Davis, Emily (2012) Fundraising and the Next Generation: Tools for Engaging the Next Generation of
Philanthropists. http://literature.foundationcenter.org/2012/04/philanthropy-and-gen-xy.html
•Glenn, J. (2008) The Original Generation X. Brainiac, Boston.com.
•Mature Marketing Matters: Marketing and Motivating Boomers and Beyond. Creating Results.
http://knowledge.creatingresults.com/category/millennialsgen-y/ Accessed 2012.
•Traditionalists, Baby Boomers, Generation X, Generation Y (and Generation Z) Working Together: What Matters
and How They Learn? How Different Are They? Fact and Fiction. United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund.
Accessed 2012.
•(2009) The New Generation of Philanthropists. The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University.
•(2011) The Millennial Donors Report. Achieve and Johnson Grossnickle and Associates (JGA).
•(2011) Fundraising Effectiveness Project,.AFP International.
•(2012) Millennial Generation money-Obsessed And Less Concerned With Giving Back, Study Finds. Huffington
Post.
Works Cited