The Nature of Gesture and Language

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    1/25

    The Nature of Gesture andLanguage

    David F. Armstrong, William C.

    Stokoe, Sherman E. Wilcox

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    2/25

    Sherman Wilcox

    Professor of Linguistics

    Chair of Department of Linguistics at theUniversity of New Mexico

    Studies Signed languages (mostly ASL) Author of books and scholarly articles on

    linguistics, evolution of language, gesture, Deafculture, and signed language interpreting

    Learning to See , American Deaf Culture , TheGestural Origin of Language , The Nature ofGesture and Language

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    3/25

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    4/25

    Can gesture be considered

    independent of speech? some linguists think there is no relationship

    Manual gestures serve referential functions:McNeill (1985)

    Gestural primitives common to all people (and in somecases all primates/mammals)

    bigness = sign of threat/intimidation = loudness

    smallness = signs of submission = softness

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    5/25

    What are the different forms of

    gesture? Salient gestures that are universally

    understood

    Gestural pool unique to but universalwithin a social group

    Spoken/signed gestures unique to spokenand signed communities respectively(mutually unintelligible)

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    6/25

    Defining what is linguistic

    We tend to consider linguistic what we can write down, andnonlinguistic everything else; but this division is a cultural artifact, anarbitrary limitation derived from historical evolution --McNeill, 1985

    How is written communication different from gesturalcommunication (spoken or signed)?

    words are complexes of muscular gestures which are temporallyordered, but not in the serial segmental fashion familiar fromclassical [linguistic] theory --- Mowrey and Pagliuca (1988)

    Wilcox & co. argue against the assumption

    that grammar is independent of meaninggrammar is based on body schema!

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    7/25

    Connecting our mouths to our

    bodies The human vocal apparatus is capable of producing a vast array ofsounds, just as the body as a whole is capable of producing anenormous number of visible movements. --- Armstrong (1986)

    Gesture and speech function as an inseparable unit --- McNeill

    Evidence from childrens language acquisition supports this theory(especially from studies between a mother infant)

    The study of both spoken and signed language production thesearch for the neural basis of human communication in general

    Telling us something about the evolution of language looking atthe importance of hands, the visual system, and upright posture inthe development of language

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    8/25

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    9/25

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    10/25

    If we take this approach

    We assume that the mental and the physical and

    independent of one another (linguistic units are

    therefore only mental things)

    One linguist named Kendon

    (1991) asks if language

    began as gesture, why did itnot stay that way?

    Wilcox & co. answer: It did stay that way!

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    11/25

    Is the organization of signed and

    spoken language the same? Over the years there have been

    assumptions that language cannotbe separated from speech.

    However thats NOT True

    by looking to vision as the

    major primate and humanperceptual system, we mayescape the error of mistaking theacoustic manifestation oflanguage for language itself.

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    12/25

    It has its own rules ofgrammar and syntax.

    Signed languages havebeen demonstrated to behighly constrained, followinggeneral restrictions onstructure and organization

    comparable to thoseproposed for spokenlanguage H. Poizner, E.S.Klima, and U. Bellugi

    Linguistic research has established

    that ASL is a natural human

    language.

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    13/25

    This also goes for other signed

    languages: There are many different kinds of signed languages andeach are distinct and independent.

    Each language has their own linguistic cultures.

    If one wanted to be truly

    proficient in signed language

    then they should be immersed

    in a community of deaf people

    much in the same way

    other foreign languages

    are learned.

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    14/25

    Deaf Culture

    There are people who prefer to refer to themselves asDeaf as opposed to hearing impaired

    The bond between Deaf people does not arise fromthe same cultural norms as those in surroundingcommunities who hear

    Deaf people from all over the world are also divided bylanguage barriers as there is no universal signlanguage. (Though there is Gestuno)

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    15/25

    Gaulldet University

    University for the education of the deaf

    and heard of hearing that is located in

    Washington, D.C.

    Bilingual community in which ASL and

    English co-exist

    Deaf President Now

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    16/25

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    17/25

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    18/25

    Language in general shares a

    general cognitive substrate. Alphabetical writing, inventedlong after language began tobe spoken, produces theillusion that vocal gesturescan reveal whole structure of

    language.

    This is counter to thewidespread belief that thewords of languages must becomposed of vocal material,the material composing wordsin the primary sign languagesof deaf populations is visual.

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    19/25

    Primary sign language was not intended to

    replace a spoken language, it is intended to beused as a means of communication for those

    who cannot hear and may not be able to speak

    Visible actions...can stand in the reinforce andduplicate and even substitute for vocal

    messages; they can stand in the absence of

    speech for the means of unspoken words they

    can accompany speech and help to mark itsprosody and regulate its flow

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    20/25

    We should remember thatsound is an abstract

    concept.

    Ex: For instance theexample given in the bookstates that we as humans

    ask for eyewitness and notearwitnesses.

    Different organization ofspoken languages andsigned languages isinevitable, given thedifferences in the twoperceptual systems.

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    21/25

    Facts about ASL

    Dominant sign language used by the DeafCommunity in the U.S.

    It shares NO RELATION to British SignLanguage

    It has its own grammar structure includingphonology, morphology, semantics, syntax,and pragmatics

    Its a visual language thus uses complex

    visual-spatial orientation

    Also contains gestures, classifiers,fingerspelling, etc.

    More related to FSL

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    22/25

    Baby Sign Language

    Developed by professors LindaAcredolo and Susan Goodwyn

    Joseph Garcia found thatbabies exposed to signsregularly at 6 to 7 months canbegin using them as early as 8months

    Belief that young children havedesire to communicated butvocal ability and coordinationlags behind cognitive ability

    Learn words such as eat,sleep, hug, play, etc.

    Home based and ASL basedsigning

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    23/25

    Emotes: An example of Gesture

    =)

    =(

    T___T

    ^^;;;

    :0

    :p

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    24/25

  • 8/7/2019 The Nature of Gesture and Language

    25/25

    Bibliography

    Wilcox, Sherman; Armstrong, David;

    Stokoe, William. Gesture and the Nature

    of Language. New York: Cambridge

    University Press, 1995

    http://www.deaflibrary.org/ by Karen

    Nakamura