32
The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000

The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000

Page 2: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Page 3: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

National Assessment of Educational Progress 2

Page 4: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

National Assessment of Educational Progress 3

Page 5: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Features of the 2000 Mathematics Assessment

Page 6: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Content of the 2000 Mathematics Assessment

Page 7: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

National Scale Score Results Across Years

Significantly different from 2000.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 8: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

National Scale Score Percentiles Across Years

Significantly different from 2000.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 9: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

National Achievement Level Results Across Years:Grade 4

Significantly different from 2000.NOTE: Percentages within each mathematics achievement level range may not add to 100, or to the exact percentages at or above achievement levels, due to rounding.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 10: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

National Achievement Level Results Across Years: Grade 8

Significantly different from 2000.NOTE: Percentages within each mathematics achievement level range may not add to 100, or to the exact percentages at or above achievement levels, due to rounding.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 11: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

National Achievement Level Results Across Years: Grade 12

Significantly different from 2000.NOTE: Percentages within each mathematics achievement level range may not add to 100, or to the exact percentages at or above achievement levels, due to rounding.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 12: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Gender Gaps in Average Scale Scores Across Years

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 13: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: White

Significantly different from 2000.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 14: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: BlackAverage Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: White

Significantly different from 2000.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 15: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: HispanicAverage Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: White

Significantly different from 2000.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 16: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: Asian/Pacific IslanderAverage Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: White

Special analyses raised concerns about the accuracy and precision of national grade 8 Asian/Pacific Islander results in 1996, and grade 4 Asian/Pacific Islander results in 2000. As a result, they are omitted from this chart.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 17: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity : American IndianAverage Scale Scores Across Years by Race/Ethnicity: White

NOTE: Sample size was insufficient to permit a reliable estimate for American Indian students in 1990 and 1992.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 18: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Racial/Ethnic Gaps in Average Scale Scores Across Years

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 19: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Average Scale Scores Across Years by Type of School

Significantly different from 2000.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990, 1992, 1996, and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 20: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

State Results 2000 vs. 1992: Grade 4

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1992 and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 21: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

State Results 2000 vs. 1996: Grade 4

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1996 and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 22: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

State Results 2000 vs. 1990: Grade 8

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1990 and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 23: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

State Results 2000 vs. 1996: Grade 8

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1996 and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 24: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Average Score by Type of Current Mathematics Course, Grade 8: 2000

Statistically significant difference between average scores.

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Page 25: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Average Scores by Teachers’ Report of Undergraduate Major, Grade 8: 2000

Statistically significant difference between average scores.

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Page 26: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Average Scores by Teachers’ Report of Total Years Taught, Grades 4 and 8: 2000

Statistically significant difference between average scores.

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Page 27: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Average Scores by Students’ Report of Frequency of Calculator Use for Classwork: 2000

Statistically significant difference between average scores.

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Page 28: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Profiles of High- and Low-Scoring Students, Grade 8: 2000

High-scoring students = top 10% of students.Low-scoring students = bottom 10% of students.SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2000 Mathematics Assessment.

Page 29: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Becoming a More Inclusive National Assessment

Page 30: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Accommodations Permitted in the 2000 Mathematics Assessment

Page 31: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

Comparison of Overall National Results in Two NAEP Samples

Statistically significant difference between average scores.

SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1996 and 2000 Mathematics Assessments.

Page 32: The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics 2000. National Assessment of Educational Progress 1

End Slide