1
The N eural E lectroM agnetic O ntology (NEMO) System: Design & Implementation of a Sharable EEG/MEG Database with ERP ontologies G. A. Frishkoff 1,3 D. Dou 2 P. LePendu 2 A. D. Malony 2,3 D. M. Tucker 3,4 1 Learning Research and Development Center (LRDC); Pittsburgh, PA 2 Computer and Information Science, University of Oregon; Eugene, OR 3 NeuroInformatics Center; Eugene, OR 4 Electrical Geodesics, Inc. (EGI) ; Eugene, OR OBJECTIVE We present the “Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontology" (NEMO) system, designed for representation, storage, mining, and dissemination of brain electromagnetic (EEG and MEG) data. Scalp EEG and MEG recordings are well-established, noninvasive techniques for research on human brain function. To exploit their full potential, however, it will be necessary to address some long-standing challenges in conducting large-scale comparison and integration of results across experiments and laboratories (cf. Ref. [1]) . One challenge is to develop standardized methods for measure generation — that is, methods for identication and labelling of “components” (patterns of interest). Despite general agreement on criteria for component identication, in practice, such patterns can be hard to identify, and there is considerable variability in techniques for measure generation across laboratories. NEMO will address this issue by providing integrated spatial and temporal ontology- based databases that can be used for large-scale data representation, mining and meta-analyses. The present paper outlines our system design and presents some initial results from our efforts to define a unified ontology for representation of spatiotemporal patterns (“components”) in averaged EEG/MEG data (event-related potentials, or ERPs). #39 NEMO ARCHITECTURE Core NEMO architecture composed of three modules (Fig. 4): database mining module inference engine query (user) interface Definitions of ontologies and databases to rely on comprehensive and standardized methods for measure generation spatial ontologies temporal ontologies cognitive functional mappings Semantic mappings between ontologies Architecture will support complex, flexible user interactions query formulation mapping-rule definitions data exchange Scalable integration system for 1.query answering 2.data exchange Online repository for storing metadata spatio-temporal ontologies database schemas mappings Figure 4 . Architecture of NEMO stystem. + DEVELOPMENT WORK Table 1 . Spatial & temporal attributes of several well-known brain electrical (ERP) components, defined for an average SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS We present initial results from our work on temporal and spatial ERP ontologies in our ontology language (Web-PDDL). We also model ERP databases based on the ERP ontologies. This data modeling process can be automatic for classes and properties but may need the interaction with human experts for other semantic definitions (e.g., logic axioms.) The ontology-based integration and inference engine works well for large relational databases with manually generated mappings (Dou & LePendu, 2005). Once the NEMO system has been built and piloted within our group, we intend to make the system available for public use. REFERENCES [1] Gardner, D., Toga, A., Ascoli, G., Beatty, J., Brinkley, J., Dale, A., et al. (2003). Towards effective and rewarding data sharing. Neuroinformatics Journal, 1, 289-295. [2] Frishkoff, G. A., Tucker, D. M., Davey, C., & Scherg, M. (2004). Frontal and posterior sources of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 20(3), 329- 354. [3] Dejing Dou and Paea LePendu. ``Ontology-based Integration for Relational Databases." In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC) 2006 DBTTA Track, 2006 [4] Frank, R., & Frishkoff, G. (2006, submitted). Automated Protocol for Evaluation of Electromagnetic Component Separation (APECS): EEG/MEG & ERP MEASURE GENERATION Net Station software architecture is being augmented to include tools for automatic measure generation (Fig. 3). Figure 3 . Interface for Statistical Extraction too in Net Station GRID-BASED ELECTROMAGNETIC INTEGRATED NEUROIMAGING (GEMINI) NEMO will be integrated with our Grid-based Electgromagnetic Integrated Neuroimaging (GEMINI) system, which is designed to support high-performance imeplementation & interoperability of tools for analysis of neuroimaging data. GEMINI architecture design (Fig. 5): Integration of multimodal neuroimaging data Management of data processing workflow Interoperability of tools for analysis of neuroimaging data Figure 5 . GEMINI software architecture DATA REPRESENTATION Multiple representational spaces Scalp topographic space (Fig 1A) Latent factor space (Fig. 1B-C) Neural source space (Fig. 2) Figure 1 . A. 128-channel ERP data showing brain electrical response to word and nonword stimuli. B. Latent temporal (PCA) representation of classical “P100” potential. C. Scalp topography for P100 potential shown in B. Figure 2 . Representation of ERP in source space (from Ref. [2]). ERP Component Scalp Topography Polarity Start Time End Time Peak Amplitud 100ms 140ms 3 V Left Hem 119 ms Right Hem118 ms occipital 150ms 210ms 3 V Left Hem 194 ms temporal Right Hem195 ms 220ms 250ms 2 V Left Hem 232 ms Right Hem221 ms 260ms 280ms 1.5 V Left Hem 276 ms Right Hem261 ms P2a frontal positive 160ms 220ms 2 V - 204 ms MFN frontal negative 330ms 400ms 3 V - 357 ms 350ms 420ms 1.5 V Left Hem 384 ms Right Hem406 ms 450ms 650ms 3.5 V Left Hem 554 ms Right Hem550 ms P100 N100 N2 N3 N400 LPC Peak Latency occipital posterior temporal anterior temporal parietal parietal positiv negativ negativ negativ negativ positiv ERP Temporal and Spatial Ontologies Component Amplitude @xsd:Stri ng @owltime:Instant N3 MFN LPC Polarity Peak Latency @topo:Topography topograp hy peak_amplitu de polarity left_hem right_he m P100 N100 Axiom 1: c - Component (= c P100) (polarity c “Positive”) o - @topo:Occipital (topography c o) Axiom 2: c - Component (= c N100) (polarity c “Negative”) ( o - @topo:Occipital (topography c o) t - @topo:Temporal (topography c t)) …;;more axioms ERP Ontology-based Database schema start_ti me end_time

The N eural E lectro M agnetic O ntology (NEMO) System:

  • Upload
    media

  • View
    34

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The N eural E lectro M agnetic O ntology (NEMO) System: Design & Implementation of a Sharable EEG/MEG Database with ERP ontologies G. A. Frishkoff 1,3 D. Dou 2 P. LePendu 2 A. D. Malony 2,3 D. M. Tucker 3,4 1 Learning Research and Development Center (LRDC); Pittsburgh, PA - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The  N eural  E lectro M agnetic  O ntology (NEMO) System:

The Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontology (NEMO) System: Design & Implementation of a Sharable EEG/MEG Database with ERP ontologies

G. A. Frishkoff1,3 D. Dou2 P. LePendu2 A. D. Malony2,3 D. M. Tucker3,4

1Learning Research and Development Center (LRDC); Pittsburgh, PA2Computer and Information Science, University of Oregon; Eugene, OR

3NeuroInformatics Center; Eugene, OR4Electrical Geodesics, Inc. (EGI) ; Eugene, OR

OBJECTIVE

We present the “Neural ElectroMagnetic Ontology" (NEMO) system, designed for representation, storage, mining, and dissemination of brain electromagnetic (EEG and MEG) data. Scalp EEG and MEG recordings are well-established, noninvasive techniques for research on human brain function. To exploit their full potential, however, it will be necessary to address some long-standing challenges in conducting large-scale comparison and integration of results across experiments and laboratories (cf. Ref. [1]) . One challenge is to develop standardized methods for measure generation — that is, methods for identication and labelling of “components” (patterns of interest). Despite general agreement on criteria for component identication, in practice, such patterns can be hard to identify, and there is considerable variability in techniques for measure generation across laboratories. NEMO will address this issue by providing integrated spatial and temporal ontology-based databases that can be used for large-scale data representation, mining and meta-analyses. The present paper outlines our system design and presents some initial results from our efforts to define a unified ontology for representation of spatiotemporal patterns (“components”) in averaged EEG/MEG data (event-related potentials, or ERPs).

#39

NEMO ARCHITECTURE

Core NEMO architecture composed of three modules (Fig. 4):

database mining module inference enginequery (user) interface

Definitions of ontologies and databases to rely on comprehensive and standardized methods for measure generation

spatial ontologiestemporal ontologiescognitive functional mappingsSemantic mappings between ontologies

Architecture will support complex, flexible user interactions

query formulation mapping-rule definitionsdata exchange

Scalable integration system for1.query answering 2.data exchange

Online repository for storing metadataspatio-temporal ontologiesdatabase schemasmappings

Figure 4. Architecture of NEMO stystem.

+–

DEVELOPMENT WORK

Table 1. Spatial & temporal attributes of several well-known brain electrical (ERP) components, defined for an average

SUMMARY & CONCLUSIONS

We present initial results from our work on temporal and spatial ERP ontologies in our ontology language (Web-PDDL).

We also model ERP databases based on the ERP ontologies. This data modeling process can be automatic for classes and properties but may need the interaction with human experts for other semantic definitions (e.g., logic axioms.)

The ontology-based integration and inference engine works well for large relational databases with manually generated mappings (Dou & LePendu, 2005).

Once the NEMO system has been built and piloted within our group, we intend to make the system available for public use.

REFERENCES

[1] Gardner, D., Toga, A., Ascoli, G., Beatty, J., Brinkley, J., Dale, A., et al. (2003). Towards effective and rewarding data sharing. Neuroinformatics Journal, 1, 289-295.

[2] Frishkoff, G. A., Tucker, D. M., Davey, C., & Scherg, M. (2004). Frontal and posterior sources of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res, 20(3), 329-354.

[3] Dejing Dou and Paea LePendu. ``Ontology-based Integration for Relational Databases." In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC) 2006 DBTTA Track, 2006

[4] Frank, R., & Frishkoff, G. (2006, submitted). Automated Protocol for Evaluation of Electromagnetic Component Separation (APECS): Application of a framework for evaluating methods of blink extraction from multichannel eeg.

EEG/MEG & ERP MEASURE GENERATION

Net Station software architecture is being augmented to include tools for automatic measure generation (Fig. 3).

Figure 3. Interface for Statistical Extraction too in Net Station

GRID-BASED ELECTROMAGNETIC INTEGRATED NEUROIMAGING (GEMINI)

NEMO will be integrated with our Grid-based Electgromagnetic Integrated Neuroimaging (GEMINI) system, which is designed to support high-performance imeplementation & interoperability of tools for analysis of neuroimaging data.

GEMINI architecture design (Fig. 5): Integration of multimodal neuroimaging data Management of data processing workflow Interoperability of tools for analysis of neuroimaging data

Figure 5. GEMINI software architecture

DATA REPRESENTATION Multiple representational spaces

Scalp topographic space (Fig 1A)Latent factor space (Fig. 1B-C) Neural source space (Fig. 2)

Figure 1. A. 128-channel ERP data showing brain electrical response to word and nonword stimuli. B. Latent temporal (PCA) representation of classical “P100” potential. C. Scalp topography for P100 potential shown in B.

Figure 2. Representation of ERP in source space (from Ref. [2]).

ERP Component

Scalp Topography

Polarity Start Time

End Time

Peak Amplitude

100ms 140ms 3 V Left Hem 119 ms

Right Hem 118 ms

occipital 150ms 210ms 3 V Left Hem 194 ms

temporal Right Hem 195 ms

220ms 250ms 2 V Left Hem 232 ms

Right Hem 221 ms

260ms 280ms 1.5 V Left Hem 276 ms

Right Hem 261 ms

P2a frontal positive 160ms 220ms 2 V - 204 ms

MFN frontal negative 330ms 400ms 3 V - 357 ms

350ms 420ms 1.5 V Left Hem 384 ms

Right Hem 406 ms

450ms 650ms 3.5 V Left Hem 554 ms

Right Hem 550 ms

P100

N100

N2

N3

N400

LPC

Peak Latency

occipital

posterior temporal

anterior temporal

parietal

parietal

positive

negative

negative

negative

negative

positive

ERP Temporal and Spatial Ontologies

Component

Amplitude @xsd:String @owltime:Instant

N3 MFN LPC

Polarity

Peak Latency

@topo:Topography

topography

peak_amplitude

polarity

left_hem

right_hem

P100

N100

Axiom 1: c - Component (= c P100) (polarity c “Positive”)

o - @topo:Occipital (topography c o)

Axiom 2: c - Component (= c N100) (polarity c “Negative”)

( o - @topo:Occipital (topography c o)

t - @topo:Temporal (topography c t))

…;;more axioms

ERP Ontology-based Database schema

start_time

end_time