The Myth of the “Digital Native” : Why Generational Stereotyping Won’t Improve Student Learning

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 The Myth of the Digital Native : Why Generational Stereotyping Wont Improve Student Learning

    1/2

  • 8/14/2019 The Myth of the Digital Native : Why Generational Stereotyping Wont Improve Student Learning

    2/2

    Please call us for a list ofreferences in your area.

    We specialize in:

    E-rate/CTF Technology design Low-voltage construction Low-voltage inspection

    management services

    Infinity already serves15%of all

    California school districts.

    Our goal is to serve you too.

    Here there is a point well taken in Pren-skys argument: blocking social media inthe classroom cuts our students off fromsome of the most powerful of these publi-

    cation opportunities. As technology usingeducators and administrators, we must findways to comply with our responsibilitiesto secure networks and meet legal filteringrequirements that nevertheless do not cripplestudents access to robust interactive andcollaborative environments.

    We must also acknowledge and confrontthe curmudgeons in our ranks, providing richstaff development opportunities and ongo-ing follow-up interventions to enable thosecolleagues who may be reluctant to embracecreative technologies. When teachers acceptthat their students may have superior skilllevels to theirs in some areas of manipulating

    and navigating digital tools, it can help thestudents to acknowledge, in turn, that thereare critical and analytic skills they need tolearn from the teachers. Ive had studentsangrily denounce me: Theres no advertising

    in movies! When I ask them to notice theway actors always seem to hold their sodacans with the labels towards the camera,and reflect if they take such pains to show

    their friends what brand theyre drinking,their perceptions begin to shift. The mostimportant technological skill is judgment.

    Teaching students how to evaluate theveracity and reliability of the Internet andother digital resources is another key skill.From reading Alan Novembers classicanalysis of a holocaust denial Web site(November, 1998) to acquiring a basicunderstanding of top-level domains, stu-dents need to know how the Web is builtand whats behind the text and images onthe screen.

    Always asking ourselves about contextand background helps us with another key

    information age skill, negotiation. Whocontrols this space Im entering? What are itsnorms? What will happen to the informationI share here? The importance of asking thesequestions and knowing how to find their

    answers is not generation specific.Finally, making good use of technology

    requires what I like to call tapping thewell. Ultimately, creative processes are

    all forms of narrative, and if students areunable to connect to and trust their ownimaginations, there are no stories to tell.Sherry Turkle, a clinical psychologist and thedirector of the M.I.T. Initiative on Technol-ogy and Self, says schools also need to allowstudents to experience stillness, because therest of their lives is not making it easy forthem to find stillness (Turkle, 2009). Dialogin social media about the books we read cancreate rich interaction, but we still have tobe able to sit still long enough to read thebook in the first place.

    Fred Mindlin is Associate Director for

    Technology Integration with the CentralCalifornia Writing Project (CCWP). Visitwww.thedigitalstoryteller.com.

    REFERENCES

    Bennett, S., Maton, K. & Kervin, L. 2008. The digitalnatives debate: A critical review of the evidence.British Journal of Educational Technology. Accessedin draft form at http://www.cheeps.com/karlmaton/pdf/bjet.pdf

    McKenzie, Jaime. 2007. Digital Nativism, DigitalDelusions, and Digital Deprivation. From Now On,the educational technology journal, Vol 17, No 2,November 2007. Accessed at http://fno.org/nov07/nativism.html#GenerationM

    http://www.educause.edu/blog/gbayne/EDUCAUSE-Now19ImplicationsofSoc/179382

    November, Alan. 2009. Teaching Zack to think.Originally published 1998. Accessed at ht tp://novem-berlearning.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/teaching-zack-to-think.pdf

    Prenksy, Marc. (2001a). Digital Natives, Digital Immi-grants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

    Prenksy, Mark. (2001b). Digital Natives, Digital Immi-grants, Part II. Do they really think differently? On theHorizon, 9(6), 1-6.

    Siemens, George. 2007. Digital natives and immi-grants: A concept beyond its best before date. http://www.connectivism.ca/?p=97

    Turkle, Sherry. 2009. Saving Stillness. Video at http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/digitalnation/learning/concentration/saving-stillness.html?play

    Winter 2010 DataBus 13