20
The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate Andrew Turner, Pete Inness, Julia Slingo IPSL/CGAM workshop on Tropical Climate 26-27 May 2005

The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

  • Upload
    kisha

  • View
    54

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

IPSL/CGAM workshop on Tropical Climate 26-27 May 2005. The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate. Andrew Turner, Pete Inness, Julia Slingo. Why flux adjust?. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different

ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

Andrew Turner, Pete Inness, Julia Slingo

IPSL/CGAM workshop on Tropical Climate

26-27 May 2005

Page 2: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

Why flux adjust?• Coupled GCMs generating mean climatologies

more in line with observations are more likely to simulate the correct interannual variability of tropical precipitation (Sperber and Palmer, 1996).

• State of equatorial Pacific SSTs long regarded as an important predictor of the Asian summer monsoon (Charney and Shukla, 1981; many others).

• For a GCM to be used for seasonal prediction it should be able to simulate both these SSTs and the teleconnection between them and the monsoon.

• This depends on the Walker circulation being correctly represented.

Page 3: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

The Model

HadCM3:• Atmosphere: 3.75x2.5 at L30 (better

representation of intraseasonal tropical convection then L19 – Inness et al., 2001).

• Ocean: 1.25x1.25, 20 levels.• 100 year integration.

Page 4: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

Why flux adjust?

Page 5: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

HadCM3 mean summer climate• 3.75lon x 2.5lat, L30 configuration (Inness et al., 2001)

Page 6: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

HadCM3 mean summer climate

Page 7: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

Heat flux adjustments• Flux adjustments

devised by Inness et al. (2003) to give better representation of MJO.

• Annual cycle of FA applied to a 100 year coupled integration.

• Tropical Pacific and Indian Oceans only.

Annual mean

Standard deviation

Page 8: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

Improvements to the mean state

Page 9: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

Improvements to the mean state

Page 10: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

ENSO properties in the current climate

• Shallower and more intense thermocline in HadCM3FA, coupled with warmer SSTs on the equator (higher coupling strength) allows for stronger ENSO.

• Biennial increase related to coupling strength.

all are Nino-3 regions

Page 11: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

ENSO properties in the current climate

DJF Nino-3 SST lag-correlated with equatorial Pacific SST (after Ashrit et al., 2003)

• El Nino periodicity has greater spread.

• Better warm pool behaviour; pre-El Nino extension more WWEs, which help trigger El Nino (Vecchi and Harrison, 2000; Lengaigne et al., 2004)

ERA-40 HadCM3 HadCM3FA

Page 12: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection

• Stronger and better timed teleconnection with flux adjustments.

• Monsoons feed back on Pacific system to further intensify ENSO.

• Warmest waters further east, repositioning the convection and Walker circulation.

See Turner et al. 2005 for more information! HadCM3 HadCM3FA

Page 13: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

The effect of climate change

Page 14: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

The effect of climate change

Page 15: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

ENSO properties in future climate

Page 16: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

ENSO properties in future climate

Page 17: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

The teleconnection

Page 18: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

Summary and the future…

Current climate:• Flux adjustments, whilst having some drawbacks, can help correct

mean state and have beneficial effect on monsoon predictability.• Stronger teleconnection (and greater coupling); more realistic

Walker circulation & El Nino development.• Flux adjustments highlight the danger in assuming a linear system,

anomaly forecasting etc.Future climate:• Combining increased greenhouse gases with flux correction may

be pushing HadCM3 closer to some ‘bifurcation point’.• An extreme monsoon may be sending ENSO into the limiting cycle,

due to increased air-sea interaction in the west Pacific.

Page 19: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

Summary and the future…

Need to determine:• Why is 2xCO2 FA able to flip between

different regimes?• What causes the regime change?

anomalous monsoon (increased air-sea coupling), period of intense WWEs?

A further HadCM3FA 2xCO2 integration will see if biennial regime returns.

Page 20: The monsoon-ENSO teleconnection and different ENSO regimes in a flux corrected future climate

References

• Ashrit et al. (2003) J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 81.• Charney and Shukla (1981) Monsoon Dynamics: predictability of monsoons, CUP• Inness et al. (2001) Clim. Dyn., 17.• Inness et al. (2003) J. Clim., 16.• Lengaigne et al. (2004) Clim. Dyn., 23.• Turner et al. (2005) Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 131.(607)• Vecchi and Harrison (2000) J. Clim., 31.