23

THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s
Page 2: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

E X P L O R I N G T H E 5 0 – Y E A R C A R E E R O F P H O T O G R A P H E R Jerry Uelsmann,

T H E M I N D ’S EY E traces the growth of one of the 20th century’s unique

artistic minds. The images range from rarely seen documentary

photos of the 1950s to the complex photomontages that challenged

the very notion of what a photograph could be.

Page 3: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

THE MIND’S EYE > PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANN

Page 4: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

FormywifeandsoulmateMaggie Taylor,thebeaconthatismyresourcefulandlovingnavigationalconfidant.

The

Min

d’s

Eye—

Phot

ogra

phs

ByJ

erry

Uel

sman

n.

Cop

yrig

ht©

201

0by

Mod

ernb

ook

Editi

ons.

All

righ

tsre

serv

ed.N

opa

rto

fthi

sbo

okm

ayb

e

repr

oduc

edin

any

form

orb

yan

yel

ectr

onic

or

mec

hani

calm

eans

,inc

ludi

ngin

form

atio

nst

orag

e

and

retr

ieva

lsys

tem

s,w

ithou

tper

mis

sion

in

wri

ting

from

the

publ

ishe

r,ex

cept

by

are

view

er

who

may

quo

teb

rief

pas

sage

sor

repr

oduc

e

imag

esin

are

view

.

Firs

tEdi

tion

Mar

ch2

010

Libr

ary

ofC

ongr

ess

Con

trol

Num

ber:

2009

9405

18

Lim

ited

Editi

on:9

78–0

–980

1044

–4–8

Regu

larE

ditio

n:9

78–0

–980

1044

–5–5

IM

AG

ES

A

RE

A

VA

IL

AB

LE

F

OR

EX

HI

BI

TI

ON

,

PU

RC

HA

SE

,

AN

D

LI

CE

NS

IN

G

jerr

yuel

sman

n.co

m

DE

SI

GN

ER

Con

nie

Hw

ang

conn

iehw

angd

esig

n.co

m

PU

BL

IS

HE

R

Mod

ernb

ook

Editi

ons

494

Uni

vers

ityA

venu

e,P

alo

Alto

,CA

943

01U

SA

+16

503

276

325,

mod

ernb

ook.

com

Page 5: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s
Page 6: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

CL

OU

D

GL

AS

SE

S

WA

TE

R

BI

RD

HO

US

E

EY

E

TR

EE

BO

OK

CreditLines

Bibliography

CatalogoftheW

ork

Plates

SomeH

umanisticC

onsiderationsofPhotography

Post–Visualization

PhotographyThroughtheK

aleidoscope

JerryUelsm

ann:PrimaFacie

P 9P 17

P 48

P 52

P 57

P 266

P 273P 282

Page 7: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

The photomontages of Jerry N. Uelsmann are as instantly recognizable as any photographic images made in

thesecondhalfof the20th century. Today theystandasgerminal, theprogenitorsofanapproach tophotographic image-makingso

JERRY UELSMANN: PRIMA FACIE

well-established and widespread that it’s strange to recall (and, for a younger

audience,nodoubtdifficulttoimagine)thestormofcontroversythatragedaround

themastheyfirstbeganappearingintheearly1960s.

WhenUelsmannbeganworkinginthisformofphotography

almostfivedecadesago,thecontextinwhichhelaboredwasdiametricallyopposite

tothatinwhichhefunctionstoday.Partlyduetohisconsistentanddetermined

efforts—aspractitioner,astheorist,asteacher,aspubliclecturer,andgenerally

asexemplar—theworkingdefinitionofwhatconstitutesthefullfieldofideasand

strategies in contemporary photography is a far more expansive one than that

whichwasoperativewhenhesetoutonhispath. >

P 9

1. True, authentic, or adequate at first sight; ostensible.

2. Evident without proof or reasoning; obvious.

A D J E C T I V E :

At first sight; before closer inspection.

A D V E R B :

BY

A

.

D.

C

OL

EM

AN

Page 8: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

Dispute has always swirled around this practice. Photomontage first attracted widespread attention in the

mid-nineteenthcenturythroughthedirectorial,literaryworkofHenryPeachRobinsonandO.G.Rejlander,whosetechniquesandresults

concerningthepredictabilityandliteralnessofthephotograph.Thisheightensawarenessoftheimagery’sartificiality,evokingadifferent

setofquestionsinregardtoitspurpose.

Unlike photocollage, with which it’s sometimes confused,

photomontageisgeneratedonphotographicpaperorfilmandoftenlooks—atleast

atfirstglance—likeunmanipulatedimagery.AsUelsmann’soeuvredemonstrates,

evenwhenthecombinatorialnatureofthefinishedworkisrecognizeditmayoffer

littleorno indicationofwhereonecomponentendsandanotherbegins.Those

who employ it deliberately propose a radical alternative to the naturalism that

has been the stock-in-trade of photography since its inception. Photomontage

providesunsettlingevidencethat,paradoxically,althoughthecameramustalways

address something in front of the lens, some photographs portray events that

neverhappened.

Thesearenotdocumentsofanysinglemomentofexternal

“reality.”Theirpurposeisnottodeludetheviewerintothepermanentconvictionthat

theworldreallylookedthatway.Instead,theycontradicttheviewer’sassumptions

were the subject of heatedandeven violent debateamongphotographersand

critics.Vernacularphotography—postcardimageryandportraitureinparticular—

popularizedit.Inthe1920sitbecameastapleofmodernistpracticeinEurope,even

entering thephotographycurriculumdevised for theBauhausbyLászlóMoholy-

Nagy,whocalledit“simultaneousseeingbymeansoftransparentsuperimposition.”

ButmodernistsintheU.S.repudiatedit,andthephoto-historicalestablishmentin

theStates,sharingtheirbiases,virtuallybanisheditfromthescene.

Yet even when photomontage fell into disfavor, it refused

todie.BeforeUelsmannandothersofhisgenerationbeganexploringthissetof

practices,suchNorthAmericanexperimentersasBarbaraMorgan,EdmundTeske,

ClarenceJohnLaughlin,andValTelbergwerepursuingthem.However,intheU.S.

photosceneafterWorldWarII,the“purist”approachadvocatedbysuchfigures

asEdwardWeston,AnselAdams,andtheWestCoastschoolwasdominant.They

preachedwhatAdamscalled“pre-visualization”—thefullrealizationoftheimage

at themomentofexposure;by their lights,anysubsequent tamperingwith the

dataonthenegativewasanathema. >

P 11P 10

Page 9: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

P 12 P 13

hisopinionprovedtheviabilityofphotomontageasacontemporaryimage-makingstrategy,alongwithatheoryandateachingmethodology

togowithit.

Uelsmann—goadedintohisinquirybyhismentoratIndiana

University,thelatephotographer,educator,andtheoristHenryHolmesSmith—set

outtodemonstratethattherewasanotherway.Inthelate1950sandearly1960s

(during and after his graduate studies underSmith) Uelsmann devoted a great

dealofstudy,experiment,andenergytorevivingtheprocesseshefoundrelevant

to his vision. Compiling and using an image bank of negatives from which he

coulddrawspecificcomponents,heevolvedanindiosyncraticmethodology.Inthis

approachtopraxis,thedarkroombecamealocusforwhatUelsmannreferstoas

“in-processdiscovery.”

Eventually,hedevelopedhisprintmakingskillstothepoint

wherehecouldblendanynumberofthosecomponentsseamlesslyintoonefinal

image.(Eschewingtheexpedientofthecopynegative,whichmanyphotomonteurs

employasalabor-savingdevice,hecontinuestomakeeachgelatin-silverprintof

anygivenimagebyreassemblingthecomponentnegativesandstartingfromthe

beginning.)Bythemiddle1960she’dproducedabodyofworkthatinhisopinion

Then he took the step—rare in photography, though not uncommon in the other creative media—of issuing an

articulate,cogentmanifesto-cum-credo,explaininginbroadtermswhathewasdoing,whyhewasdoingit,andwhyhecontinuedtocall

himself a photographer.Publishing in1967apositionpaper that describedhis

contrary methodology as “post-visualization,” this seemingly mild-mannered

Detroitnativethrewdownhisgauntlet.InthewordsofcuratorandhistorianPeter

Bunnell,thischallenge—andthewayinwhichUelsmannhasrisentoitsdemands

asapicture-makerovertheyears—canappropriately“beseentohavealteredthe

language,thesubstance,andthedirectionof[themediumitself].”

Fromthebeginning,Uelsmannhaselaboratedasometimes

obliquelyandsometimesdirectlyautobiographicaldream-world.Thismicrocosm

partakesofthesurreal,initsnon-oranti-literalevocationofdreams,fantasies,

visions,andhallucinations,aswellasintherecurrentsymbolofthehand,akey

elementinclassicsurrealistphotography.Italsoisimbuedwithstrongelementsof

thegrotesque,inthatterm’straditionalart-historicalmeaning.Grotesquemotifs

throughouthis imagery includebizarreapparitionsofdisembodiedhumanparts,

themergingofhumanbeingswithvariousnaturalobjects,andtheblendingand

intertwiningofotheranimal,mineralandvegetableforms.>

Page 10: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

community in the 1960s are now appearing in the mass media, in relation to the increasing prominence of electronically generated

compositeimages.

It seems to beUelsmann’s fate to haveestablisheddarkroom-generated photomontageas legitimateand viable

withinclassicphotographicpracticebybringingittoitspinnacleofvirtuosicexpression,onlytowitnesstheobsolescingofthatpracticein

Yet these images resist easy categorization: to label

Uelsmann a surrealist, a pantheist, a mythologist, or a diarist is to disregard

other,equallysignificantaspectsofhiswork.Whatseemsinarguableisthat,in

additiontoprovingthevalidityofhisapproachbyproducing imagerythatat its

best is unsettling, enchanting, magical, and oddly melancholy, Uelsmann has

demonstratedaremarkableconsistencyofvision.Againandagaininhisimagery,

alonelyandoftenshadowymalefigure(astand-inrepresentingthephotographer)

searchesconvoluted,mysterious,multi-dimensionalscapespervasivelyanimated

bytheFeminine,seekingcontactwiththeOther.Fundamentally,he’sawanderer

throughinnerspace,alyricpoetusinganewlanguagetorecounthisadventures.

And part of the pleasure of engaging with Uelsmann’s photographs is that the

danceofsymbolsthereinneverseemstheory-driven,intellectualized,orotherwise

forced,butemerges,unpremeditated,throughplayandexperiment.

Due to theomnipresenceofdigital imagingsystems today,

darkroom-based photomontage as a craft can already be considered archaic.

(Indeed, the Rochester Institute of Technology, where Uelsmann studied the

mediumasanundergraduate,willbegintoteachgelatin-silverprintingitselfasan

“alternativeprocess”inthefallof2008).Ironically,versionsofthedisputesthat

tookplaceoverUelsmann’searlyimagerywithinthemicrocosmofthephotography

itsentiretybytheonslaughtofelectronicimaging.Inthatsense,heconstitutesa

terminus.Butwecanalsoviewhimasaspringboard:inbuildingawideinternational

audience for his own imagery and encouraging his colleagues in their parallel

experiments,hehelpedpreparethatreceptivesoilinwhichcomputer-generated

imageryhasnowtakenroot.

Yet,aslongashe’spermittedtopursuehisowninclinations,

hedoesn’tappeartoregretthatculturaltransition.Thiswasneveramanspoiling

forafightoverwhatwasorwasnotpermissibleincreativephotography,merely

someonewhosevisioncarriedhimintoone.Still, it’ssafetosaythatnofuture

studyofthehistoryofphotomontagewillbeconsideredseriouslyunlessittakes

thetheory,thepractice,theteaching,and—mostimportantlyofall—theimagery

ofJerryUelsmannintoaccount.

P 15P 14

© Copyright 2008 by A. D. Coleman. All rights reserved. By permission of the author and Image/World

Syndication Services, [email protected].

Page 11: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

21

Page 12: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

26 2725

Page 13: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

43

Page 14: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

5049

Page 15: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

57

“My visual quest is driven by a desire to create a universe capable of supporting feelings and ideas.” > JERRY UELSMANN

Page 16: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

8281

Page 17: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

97 98

Page 18: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

1210 11

Page 19: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

101

“I am drawn to art that challenges one’s sense of reality.” > JERRY UELSMANN

Page 20: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

117116

Page 21: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

126

Page 22: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s

“The camera is essentially a license to explore.” > JERRY UELSMANN

170

Page 23: THE MIND’S EYE PHOTOGRAPHS BY JERRY UELSMANNfor a fight over what was or was not permissible in creative photography, merely someone whose vision carried him into one. Still, it’s