Upload
valentine-frederick-harrell
View
222
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Logistics Support System (LSS) has been possible thanks to the active participation of the following agencies: WHO, PAHO, UNICEF, WFP, OCHA, and UNHCR.
Counts with the participation of the principal NGOs and others humanitarian actors to help countries and organizations in the management of humanitarian assistance and
emergency supplies.
This recognition extends to the countries that have contributed their logistical experience in disaster management and the following organizations who participated with their time and personnel in the technical meetings and workshops on the logistical management of humanitarian supplies: CARE, World Economic Forum, MSF, OXFAM UK, FICR, HAP, AHA, Fritz Institute, All Russian Disaster Medicine Centers, World Bank, VOICE, Interaction, CICR, BIOFORCE, USD Defense
Logistic Agency, Zacshta Center. Additionally, FUNDESUMA and UNJLC have contributed to the design and development of the software and technical documentation. The following
development agencies have contributed with financial support: the Swedish international development cooperation agency (SIDA), the United Kingdom’s Department for International
Development (DFID), the Office for Foreign Disaster Assistance of the United States of America (OFDA/USAID), the Division of Humanitarian Assistance, Peace and Security of the Canadian
International Development Agency (CIDA), the European Union Directorate General for Humanitarian Aid (ECHO) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Dutch Government.
SUMA & LSS To help countries and organizations in the management of humanitarian
assistance and emergency supplies.
LSS Project
Agreement between UN agencies
To develop an integrated system to improve coordination
Chronology of the LSS Project
2001-2002 Six UN agencies and main NGOs agreed on main principles of humanitarian supply management
Mid 2002 Approval of RFPs (Terms of Reference)
Jan 2003 Contract signed with vendor following UN rules
July 2003 Design Document approved
Sep-2004 Beta software finished – Demo to UN working group
End 2004 Testing of beta version (November-December 2004)
Mid 2005 Reception of Version 1.0 (Windows and Web applications)
Mid 2005 Testing and training courses with LEMA users
LSS Main Objectives
• To consolidate and share information on a limited number of key commodities between all actors to facilitate inter-institutional coordination.
• To complement agency-specific commodity tracking systems • To register incoming supplies in an affected country (including unsolicited
supplies)• To provide a tool for National Emergency Authorities (all disasters), NGO, UN
Agencies, etc.• To be useful in:
• Major emergencies (OCHA - LEMA)• Small scale emergencies (LEMA – Local NGO - Project)• Non-emergency situation (Warehouse)
• To minimize duplication and improve the response to actual needs of affected populations
• To strength national capacity in logistic management
The system IS NOT replacing any other system that Agencies, NGOs or other actors may have to manage their own supplies
Main functions
1. Registering: the donation received2. Classifying : What is it?
3. Sorting : assigning a priority. 4. Inventorying: How many?5. Warehouse management:controlling stock 6. Pipeline: Pledges7. Request: national or local 8. Exchange information
The information of each site in consolidated in
the central LSS/SUMA site, using files send
by each site.
LSS/SUMA Site # 1 WHO
Warehouse in Erbil KRG
450sq mts
LSS/SUMA – WHO Iraq Consolidated StockConsolidate information of LSS/SUMA Sites
Site 2,3,4WHO
Warehouse in
Baghdad, Duhuk and Suleymania
MOH/KRG Warehouses
Warehouse supported by
WHO
1000sq mts
EOC in stand alone
environment or networked
Each site can runs the application in stand alone mode or using a networked structure.
LSS Windows Module Functions
• Entries• Deliveries• Express• Pipeline• Request• Report on selected items (Stock Basket)• Interchange information between LSS Sites• Import information from others systems. CTS (UN,
NGO’s)
Entry Point Management
MOH / WHO Health Sector NEMA or OCHA------------------------------------------------------------• Snapshot of the supplies that has entered
to the country– Consignments– Receiving / Distribution of
International Donations
• Collect information of International Human Resources
– Who / How many / Availability
• NEMA installs/supports a team
• Registering International Donations in the Entry Point
• Warehouse Movements (In/Out)• Normal Inventory System
Stock Balance / Inventory
WHO Warehouses / LEMA Warehouses NGO / Humanitarian Actors Warehouses
• Entries by Date• Items Distributed by Destination• Stock Balances• Card Bin / Kardex of a specific
product• Movements of a specific list of items
(Stock Basket)
In non emergency situations
• The system is not only used in disaster situations, but also for routine warehousing operations:
Warehouses Hospitals Health districts NGO’s Distribution Points
Programs in the field
• Allows to change– Categories / Subcategories /
Items
• Assigned a specific values to:– Minimum / Reorder / Maximum – Specific Codes– Properties– Advanced (Coverage)– Comments
• Allows to compile information (Different codes for one specific item)
Programs at the field (WHO / UN agencies / NGO) Projects dealing with stock in warehouses
LSS/SUMA in Emergencies
SUMA in Emergencies (1992-2004)
• Paraguay, 2004 (Icua Bolanos) • Hurricane Mitch (Honduras/Salvador/Nicaragua) 1998 • Costa Rica, Floods, 2004, 2005• Venezuela, Flood, 1999• El Salvador, Earthquake, 2000• Jamaica, Hurricane Luis, 2004• Nicaragua, 1992 (Tsunami) • Mexico, Colima Volcano, 2003• Dominican Republic, Hurricane George ,1997• East Timor, 1999• Dominican Republic , Floods in Jimani, 2004• Haiti, Humanitarian Crisis, 2004• Argentina, Floods, 2004• Colombia, Earthquake• Costa Rica, Earthquake, 1993• Mexico, Hurricane Pauline• Peru, Nasca Earthquake, 1996• Angola MoH, 2003• Mexico, Floods in Chiapas, 1998• Panama , Floods, 2005• Bolivia, Earthquake, 1998
LSS in Emergencies (2005-2010)
• Guatemala, Hurricane Stan, 2005 • Pakistan, Earthquake, 2005 • Maldives, 2005 • Lebanon Humanitarian Crisis, 2006 • Bolivia, Floods, 2007/2008 • Somalia, Sudan, Kenya (WHO offices 2007) • Opt (Ramallah, 2007) • Nicaragua, Hurricane Felix, 2007 • Peru, Ica Earthquake, 2008 • Mexico, Tabasco Floods, 2008 • Colombia, Landslide Páez, 2008 • Panama, 2008 • Bolivia, Dengue Outbreak, 2009 • Gaza, 2009 • Mexico, H1N1, 2009 • El Salvador, Hurricane Ida, 2009 • Haiti, Earthquake 2010
Formalized for use in emergencies: Panama, El Salvador, Dominican Republic, Peru, Bolivia, Ecuador, Nicaragua.Outside the Americas Region: Training outside the Americas region: Iran, Turkey, Philippines, Jordan, Kenya, Somalia, Maldives, Pakistan, Lebanon, Kenya, Egypt, Gaza (Border). Used daily outside the region: Lebanon MoH, Pakistan (WHO), Somalia
LSS architecture
• Modern intuitive user interface• Multi-user support• Technical architecture separates the presentation layer from the application’s logic and data resources• Developed with Microsoft Visual Basic .Net• Developed with the object-oriented paradigm• Can be installed using a royalty-free MSDE database or Microsoft SQL Server 2000
– MSDE : Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine, royalty-free version of SQL.• SQL Based on the highly adaptable Microsoft SQL Server database technology• SQL Server: Recommend to enterprise configuration• Server.
– Recommended:• Windows application stand alone• Windows application basic networked environments• Allow a free distribution. Non SQL Server license required.
– Last version was developed in 2005. – Actually WHO/PAHO are looking for funds to update the tool.
ThanksVictor Martinez WHO/Iraq
More Information www.lssweb.netJeronimo Venegas
The Logistics Support System (LSS) has been possible thanks to the active participation of the following agencies: WHO, PAHO, UNICEF, WFP, OCHA, and UNHCR. This recognition extends to the countries that have contributed their logistical experience in disaster management and the following organizations who participated with their
time and personnel in the technical meetings and workshops on the logistical management of humanitarian supplies: CARE, World Economic Forum, MSF,
OXFAM UK, FICR, HAP, AHA, Fritz Institute, All Russian Disaster Medicine Centers, World Bank, VOICE, Interaction, CICR, BIOFORCE, USD Defense Logistic Agency,
Zacshta Center. Additionally, FUNDESUMA and UNJLC have contributed to the design and development of the software and technical documentation. The following
development agencies have contributed with financial support: the Swedish international development cooperation agency (SIDA), the United Kingdom’s
Department for International Development (DFID), the Office for Foreign Disaster Assistance of the United States of America (OFDA/USAID), the Division of
Humanitarian Assistance, Peace and Security of the Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), the European Union Directorate General for Humanitarian Aid (ECHO) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Dutch
Government.
Acknowledgments