57
CDDRL WORKING PAPERS Number 145 October 2013 The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars: Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia Benjamin Lessing Stanford University Center on Democracy, Development, and The Rule of Law Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies Additional working papers appear on CDDRL’s website: http://cddrl.stanford.edu .

The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

CDDRL Working Paper

Citation preview

Page 1: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

CDDRL WORKING PAPERS

Number 145

October 2013

The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars: Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

Benjamin Lessing Stanford University

Center on Democracy, Development, and The Rule of Law Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies

Additional working papers appear on CDDRL’s website: http://cddrl.stanford.edu.

Page 2: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

Center on Democracy, Development, and The Rule of Law Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies Stanford University Encina Hall Stanford, CA 94305 Phone: 650-724-7197 Fax: 650-724-2996 http://cddrl.stanford.edu/ About the Center on Democracy, Development and the Rule of Law (CDDRL) CDDRL was founded by a generous grant from the Bill and Flora Hewlett Foundation in October in 2002 as part of the Stanford Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. The Center supports analytic studies, policy relevant research, training and outreach activities to assist developing countries in the design and implementation of policies to foster growth, democracy, and the rule of law.

Page 3: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 4: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 5: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 6: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 7: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 8: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 9: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 10: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 11: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 12: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 13: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 14: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 15: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 16: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 17: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 18: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

D P

S D

a D −ay y [y , y] D

y P D a y P

b D B H F

D H F P s

c S sO

O ∈ H,F D

P sF = s sH = s (1− c ) ≤ sF c ∈ [0,1)c → 0 D

sH → sF

D h(·) ∈ [0,1] f (·) ∈ [0,1]h (sH ) > 0 f (sF ) > 0 sH = s (1 − c )

D h (c ) < 0 f (c ) = 0 D

D P

P P

O ∈ H,F D o ∈ h, f

c = 1

Page 19: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

h (a) = 0

f (a) > 0 P D 0 P

−φ(·) φ(a) > 0 φ(s ) < 0

h f φ sH sF a

D y b a P b

λ

λ < y λ s c

λ λ

λ

s c

D

D

∃ a > 0 : a ≥ a⇒ f (a, sF , ·) ≤ h(sH , ·) Ca

λ b λb = 0

Page 20: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

Ca

y h f φ

D b y D a

b D

a ≥ a

D a ∈ (0, a)

a∗h = 0;

H y ∈ [y , bh(·) )

B y ∈ [ bh(·) , y]

a∗f ≥ a;

F y ∈ [y , bf (·) )

B y ∈ [ bf (·) , y]

a∗ = a

Page 21: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

P

b ∗(a, ·) =

b ∗h a < a

b ∗f a ≥ a

P

D a∗h = 0 a∗f ≥ aa∗ ∈ a∗h , a∗f

D

D

D

a∗h a∗f

o ∈ h, f b ∗o

O ∈ H,F

PrO =b∗

o(·) − yy − y

b ∗h b ∗f P

b ∗h = argmaxb

1−

bh(·) − yy − y

(b − λ) +

bh(·) − yy − y · 0 = λ+ h(·)y

2

b ∗f = argmaxb

1−

bf (·) − yy − y

(b − λ)−

bf (·) − yy − y φ(·) = λ+ f (·)y −φ(·)

2

D P φ

φ

2

Page 22: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

D o ∈ h, f bmo = o(·)y bM

o = o(·)y P

o ∈ h, f b ∗o > bMo P bM

o b

b < bMhb ∗o < bm

o P bmo b

P b > bMo

b = bMo o ∈ h, f P b ∗o = max[min[b ∗o , bM

o ], b mo ]

λ

b ∗h =

h(·)y λ > h(·)yh(·)y λ < h(·)

y − (y − y )

λ+h(·)y2

b ∗f =

f (·)y λ−φ(·) > f (·)yf (·)y λ−φ(·) < f (·)

y − (y − y )

λ+ f (·)y−φ(·)2

P

D −φ(·) P

P

D P

P

a∗h = 0

a < a b ∗h

Page 23: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

λ s c λ s

c

b ∗h

λ

s

D b

c

P D

∃ cNB ∈ (0,1) : c > cNB =⇒ b ∗h ≥ bMh a = 0

D y < y = b∗ff (·) D

a∗f = argmaxa

minmaxy ,y, y

yy (1− f (·)) 1

y − y d y + yminmaxy ,y, y(y − b ∗f )

1y − y d y − a

f φ b ∗f a

a∗f

s a

f φ

f (·) ≡ sa+s

f ∈ [0,1] D y (1− f )

y ∗ fP S

Page 24: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

P

D −φ(·) ≡ −ϕ aa+s

ϕ P

h(·) ≡ sHη+sH

η

η

sH ≡ s (1− c ) < s Ca a > η sFsH= η

1−c ≡ a⇒ f > h

y

y ∼U12µ, 3

y

µ > ϕ4

a∗f

s ∈ (s , s ) a∗f > 0 s > s a∗f < 0 s ≤ s a∗f

a∗f ≥ a a∗f = max[a∗f , a]a∗f a

∃ sI > 0 s > sI

b ∗f

λ s 1 − PrF λ

s ϕ > λ ϕ < λ

ϕ = λ

Page 25: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

ϕ > λ P D

λ

D U Df

a = a∗f U Dh a = a∗b = 0

s c

D

Page 26: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

D a U Dh

a = 0 U Df

a∗fD

a D a = 0 P D

a = a∗f D b ∗

D s 1 b D

a = a∗f

D a b

µ(.44− .28) = 2.3

s c U Df > U D

h

PrF

s a b

U Df +U

Pf <U

Dh +U

Ph

Page 27: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

s s

s

b x D

s ∗ D

c = 0

∃ s ∗ ∈+ s > s ∗ ⇒U Dh >U

Df

s

s b x

c s

z D s

D s ∗

s ∗ D

∃ c ∈ (0,1) c > c D a∗ = 0 P

b ≥ bMh D

s

Page 28: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

λ

D s c P

D P s

c

y µ

y

µ

µ

U Dh U D

f µ

µ µ

∃ µ∗ ∈+ µ > µ∗ ⇒U Df >U

Dh

Page 29: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

s

µ

µ

µ

y PrH = 1 s

c P

a

am aM am aM D a ≥ am a ≥ aM

P bmf bM

f PrF = 0 PrF = 1 am aM am

ϕ > λ

a∗f >maxam, aM

s ∈ [0, sI ] P

ϕ λ

Page 30: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

s < sI s > sI

am a∗f D

Pr f > 0

λ > ϕ D

η c

D

s

Page 31: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

aω P D

aν P D a = aν+aω

−aνaω

aω < a∗f D

a∗f

a ∗ν = a∗f −aω Pr F

D aωU D

f =U Df + aω

U Dh >

U Df

aω a∗ω ≡ U Dh −U D

f D aν = 0

aν = a∗f − aω

Page 32: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

λ µ

s c

Page 33: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 34: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 35: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 36: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 37: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 38: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

s c

Page 39: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 40: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 41: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 42: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 43: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 44: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 45: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 46: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 47: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 48: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 49: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 50: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

D a ∈ (0, a)

a∗h = 0;

H y ∈ [y , bh(·) )

B y ∈ [ bh(·) , y]

a∗f ≥ a;

F y ∈ [y , bf (·) )

B y ∈ [ bf (·) , y]

P

b ∗(a, ·) =

b ∗h a < a

b ∗f a ≥ a

D a ∈ (0, a) D

ao ∈ (0, a) a < a D a P D

P b ∗o a ∈ [0, a) D

a D ao a = 0

a∗ a < a D h(·)y > y−by = b

h(·) a > a b ∗ P b

D F H a

Page 51: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

o ∈ h, f b ∗o > bMo P bM

o b

b < bMhb ∗o < bm

o P bmo b

b ∗o > bMo D b ≥ bM

o P b

b ≤ bMo bM

o !−EU P

f (bMf )= λ−φ(·)− f (·)y

f (·)(y−y )

λ−φ(·) > f (·)y P b < bMf

b ∗o < bmo : P b > bm

o D

b ≤ bmo P b < bm

o

a < a b ∗h

λ s c λ s

c

b ∗h =λ+h(·)y

2λ h(·)

s c

1 − PrH = 1 − λ+h(·)(y−2y )2h(·)(y−y ) λ

0− ! PrH!h(·) =

λ

2(y − y )h(·)2 > 0

h(·) s c

∃ cNB ∈ (0,1) : c > cNB =⇒ b ∗h ≥ bMh a = 0

h(·)|sH=0 = 0 sH = s (1− c ) limc→1b ∗h = λ2 > lim

c→1bMh = 0

s ∈ (s , s ) a∗f > 0 s > s a∗f < 0 s ≤ s a∗f

Page 52: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

b ∗f (a) =s32µ+λ−a(ϕ−λ)

2(a+s )

D

a∗f = argmaxa

s 32µ+λ−a(ϕ−λ)

2s

µ2

y

aa + s

1µd y + 3µ

2

s 32µ+λ−a(ϕ−λ)

2s

y −

s ( 32µ+ λ) + a(λ−ϕ)

2(a + s )

1µd y − a

a∗f = s

8sµ− (λ−ϕ)2 23µ2 + 12µϕ − 4ϕ2

28sµ− (λ−ϕ)2 − 1

Ω ≡ 8sµ − (λ − ϕ)2 Υ ≡ 23µ2 + 12µϕ − 4ϕ2

µ > ϕ4

Υ > 0 Ω s > s ≡ (λ−ϕ)28µ

Ω s

Ω s ∈ [0, s ). a∗f ∈ s > s a∗f s s > s

lims→s+a∗f = +∞ lim

s→∞a∗f = −∞ a∗f = 0 s = 0 s = s ≡ Υ

32µ+ s

s a∗f > 0 (s , s ) s > s

∃ sI > 0 s > sI

b ∗fa∗f > a b ∗f

a∗f= λ−ϕ

2+32µ+ϕ Ω·ΥΥ

!b∗f! s= 2µ(3µ+2ϕ)

Ω·Υ

a∗f < a b ∗f (a) = − 2η(ϕ−λ)−s (1−c )(2λ+3µ)

4(s (1−c )+η)!b∗f! s= η(3µ+2ϕ)(1−c )

4(s (1−c )+η)2

s ϕ > λ ϕ < λ

a∗f > a

PrF (a∗f ) = 14+ ϕ

2µ+ (λ−ϕ)

Ω·ΥΩ

! PrF! s= (ϕ − λ)

Ω·ΥΩ2

a∗fΩ·ΥΩ> 1 ! PrF

! s(φ− λ)

a∗f < a

PrF (a) =14+ λ

2µ+ (λ−ϕ)

2µη

s (1−c )! PrF! s= (ϕ − λ) η

2µs (1−c )

(φ− λ)

∃ s ∗ ∈+ s > s ∗ ⇒U Dh >U

Df

Page 53: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

s ≥ s ⇒U Dh >U

Df s ∗

s D a = a∗f ( s ) = 0 a∗f < a

η > 0⇒ b ∗fa=0> b ∗h D a = a

D

a = a∗F = 0 s = s U Dh >U

Df s > s

∃ c ∈ (0,1) c > c D a∗ = 0 P

b ≥ bMh D

limc→1

U Dh = µ

c > cNB P D

U Dh

c∈cNB ,1 = µ η

η+(1−c ) c → 1 µ

U Df = PrF (µ

aa+s) + (1− PrF )(µ− b )− a µ a > 0 U D

f

c c : c > c =⇒U Dh >U

Df

∃ µ∗ ∈+ µ > µ∗ ⇒U Df >U

Dh

µ→ +∞ µ > 2λ3

s (1−c )+ηs (1−c )

a∗f µ

µ a∗f a∗f

U Df

a∗f= s +µ+

3(ϕ − λ)8− ϕ(ϕ − λ)

4µ−Ω ·Υ8µ

U Dh =

18µ· λ

2(s (1− c ) + η)s (1− c ) +µ

932s (1− c ) + ηs (1− c ) + η −

3λ8

limµ→∞

U D

f

a∗f−U D

h

= +∞

Page 54: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia

am aM am aM D a ≥ am a ≥ aM

P bmf bM

f PrF = 0 PrF = 1 am aM am

ϕ > λ

b ∗f b mf bM

f a

am ≡sλ+ 1

ϕ − λ ; aM ≡sλ− 3

ϕ − λ .

λ < y = 32µ aM am ϕ > λ

b ∗f b mf a d

d a(b ∗f − bm

f ) < 0 am

a ≥ am ⇒b ∗f ≤ bmf b ∗f = bm

f a < am b ∗f > bmf am b ∗f > bm

f

a dd a(b ∗f − bM

f ) > 0 a > aM ⇒ b ∗f = bMf aM < 0⇒b ∗f < bM

f a

sI ≡ s a∗f ≤maxam, aM=

(ϕ−λ)2(3µ+2ϕ)(µ+2ϕ)2

ϕ > λ

4µ(λ−ϕ)2(3µ−2ϕ)2 ϕ < λ

sI

Page 55: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 56: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia
Page 57: The Logic of Violence in Drug Wars Cartel-State Conflict in Mexico, Brazil and Colombia