Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Mid-A Globa
Executi
Leade-Caps al C-Suite
ve Summ
ership
e Study
mary
p Dim
ensio
on of GGlobalizing
g
Intro This stumid-capexclusivcontinenconductof 2013,researchbased in This exeIndia ondivided Section The resemid-capsection,potentia Section In this lewe founrepresethem fropracticedimensi
− O− − − C
Section This seclead in gon Boar
− − O
duction
dy is a deeps. It draws vely face-tont. Lasting uted by Amro, using a strhers at IMDn Lausanne,
ecutive sumn the basis ointo three m
1: Key Traitearch studyps that diffe we highligal challenge
2: Successfeadership and several snt the vital om the larg
es on the foions: OrganizatioBoards Leadership Culture
3: What’s Nction guidesglobalizing rd design anProfiling theOrganizatio
The Lead
n and Co
p exploratioupon 83 in-face with Cup to two hop Partners ructured fra, the top-ra, Switzerlan
mmary has bof the globamain sectio
ts of Globaliy found fourerentiate anght these traes.
ful Practicesand human special and DNA of mid
ge caps. Thisllowing org
n Design an
and Talent
Next? s leaders, CXmid-caps and talent me Mid-Cap Ln and Board
dership Dime
ontents
on of the wterviews coC-suite leadhours, the in
over the Sumework de
anked globand.
been preparal Amrop-IMons:
izing Mid-Car key traits od describe taits as well
s of Globalizdimension successful d-caps and s section exanization a
nd Strategy
Manageme
XOs and Boand providesanagement
Leaders for d Initiatives
ension of Glo
s
orld of globonducted ders from evnterviews wummer and
esigned by al business s
red by AmroMD study. It
aps of globalizinthem. In thas describe
zing Mid-Caresearch, practices thdifferentiat
xplores thesnd leadersh
ent
ards on hows specific int. What’s Nex
s for What’s
obalizing Mid
balizing
very were d Fall
school
op is
ng is e the
ps
hat te se hip
w to sights
xt Next
d-Caps » 2
Forew Large pubenterprisegarner thprofessioin the Negraduatesseeking a But whatlimited wcultural atrend-setbusiness dnew and We thereof mid-cafounders,structure‘content tallied, cafindings tleaders, “with, thes Whatevedrawn dirsuccessfuthe questorganizat
Maury PeOn beha
word
blic companiees) control a se lion’s share nal service firm
ew Economy as, as well as “e new beginnin
about those work on mid-caaspects (and wtters, in part bdilemmas for different way
efore set out tap companies, CEOs, or othd interviews aanalysis’, whic
ategorized, anthat speak diretelling it like ise enterprises
r your businesrectly from thul and ambitiotions it raises tion and/or th
eiperl alf of IMD
The Lead
es (and, it seemsignificant proof attention fms. At the othand attract a lemigrés” fromng.
in the middleaps, especially
why these are because they a
the first times.
o examine, up as seen throu
her Board memand a qualitatch treats the ld compared aectly to the keit is” and raisins going forwar
ss, I hope you e words of th
ous mid-cap fito be useful qose of your cu
dership Dime
ms, more and oportion of glofrom both busher extreme, sarge number
m the large com
? The researchy on their leadvital). Yet glo
are facing som and may cho
p close and syugh the eyes ombers). We diive study metleaders’ own wacross companey issues on thng questions frd.
will find the iose running srms, to be he
questions to apustomers.
ension of Glo
more state-oobal assets ansiness academstart-ups are aof ambitious mpany sector
h base showsdership, talent
obalizing mid-cme of the classoose to addres
ystematically, of their leaderd this by mea
thodology knowords as datanies. The resuhe minds of mfor all who wo
insights in thisome of todaylpful and insppply to your o
obalizing Mid
owned d often
mics and all the rage business
r who are
far more t and caps can be sic global ss these in
a diverse set rs (typically ans of own as to be lt is a set of
mid-cap ork in, or
s report, y’s most iring, and
own
d-Caps » 3
P
*As of Cranfi
MauProfessor of Le
Stra
@
f 2015, Maury Pield School of M
ury Peipereadership anategic Change
IMD@MauryPeipe
eiperl is Dean oManagement, U
rl d e, D* rl
of
UK
Forew Already ato join thestablisheoperatingjourney is We have and ambiover the wand are wfunctiona We wantfully claimorganizatNext.’ We therededicatedsought todiverse o We sincehelping uand raise As one wjoin their a wealth I wish you
Ulrich DaOn beha
word
a powerful ecohe leading orgaed in their natg beyond regios a fast-evolvi
long suspecteitions. In our dworld we expe
witnessing signality.
ed to connectm our right totions deserve,
efore decided d to exploringo identify somrganizations a
rely thank IMus to build our
a number of
who may alreadworld, or wouof ideas here
u a thought-p
ade alf of the Am
The Lea
onomic force, anizations of ttional or regioonal boundaring one.
ed that globalday-to-day interience a widenificant shifts
t and consolid deliver the ‘tto help them
to launch ourg, in depth, theme of the comacross contine
D, and all of or first hypothekey questions
dy be leading uld simply liketo help you o
provoking jour
mrop Partner
dership Dim
today’s globatomorrow. Ma
onal markets, ses. Whatever
lizing mid-capteractions wite spectrum ofin Board com
date these exprusted adviso identify their
r Global Studye exciting wormon themes u
ents.
our participatieses, set out sos for mid-caps
a mid-cap orge to understann your way.
rney.
ship
ension of Glo
alizing mid-caany are firmlysome are alre their status, t
ps had special th senior manf leadership ta
mposition and
periences, in orship’ that mir ‘Leaders For
y - a formal inrld of mid-capuniting these
ng organizatioome importans to ask thems
ganization, isnd it better, y
obalizing Mid
ps are set y ady their
cultures agers all
alent needs,
order to d-cap What’s
itiative ps. We very
ons, for nt findings, selves.
seeking to ou will find
d-Caps » 4
UChaExe
The Amro
lrich Dadeairman of the
ecutive Boardp Partnership
e e , p
Study Intervieweepublished iwithheld toParticipant
ParticipatCIA HeringDuratex SLocaliza ReWeg S.A. Aimia Inc. Cott CorpEmera IncIAMGOLDShawCor LAlmaceneGrupo ArgGrupo de OrganizacCopa HoldAjegroup Yanbal IntPalace Ent
ParticipatCardno LtdIncitec PivInfinitus (CShanghai YYip’s ChemAstra InterPT Bank CPT GarudaChiyoda CITO EN Lt
y Partici
es from the fon the report. Wo respect conf Demographic
ting Companyg S.A. .A. ent a Car S.A.
oration .
D Corporation Ltd. s Exito S.A.
gos S.A. Inversiones Su
ción Corona S.dings S.A.
ternational/Untertainment
ting Companyd.
vot Ltd. China) CompaYongfeng Hotmical Holdingrnational Tbk
CIMB Niaga Tba Indonesia (PCo. Ltd. d.
The Lead
pants
ollowing organWe sincerely tfidentiality, focs.
y
uramericana S.A.
nique S.A
y
any Ltd. t Dip Galvanizs Ltd.
bk ersero) Tbk
dership Dime
nizations havethank them, a
or their invalua
Americ
S.A
zing Co. Ltd.
ension of Glo
e given formaland all other iable contribut
cas (North an
InRMSInMCEMERCFCACCE
Asia-PacificInInMCInPCBARB
obalizing Mid
l permission fonterviewees wtion to our stu
nd South)
ndustry Retail ManufacturingServices ndustrial EngiMarketing andConsumer GooEnergy Minerals Energy Retail ConglomerateFinancial ServiConstruction MAviation Consumer GooCosmetics Entertainment
c ndustry nfrastructureMining and MaConsumer Goondustrial PetrochemicalConglomerateBanking Aviation Retail Beverages
d-Caps » 5
or their organwhose organizudy. Please ref
g
neering Advertising ods
ces
Material and R
ods
t
anufacturing ods
ls
nizations’ namzation names fer to page 22
Retail
es to be have been
2 for further
ParticipatTelekom AWienerberCeva SantIpsen JCDecaux Somfy SA Carl Zeiss GEA GrouKIRCHHOWincor NiAditya BirEssar GrouGenpact GMR GrouKEC InternMarico IndRPG EnterTata ComFerrari S.pFugro N.VJotun AS PetroleumSchibsted Asseco PoInterCars SMota-EngExxaro ResCorp/ParqEDP RenovFreixenet Grupo CelViscofán SNIBE A.B Lonza AG Akçansa CDoğan SirkPetrokimyUlker BiskOMV PetrQIWI PLC Uralchem NIS a.d. N
ting CompanyAustria AG rger AG té Animale
AG p AG
OFF Automotivixdorf Internala Managemeup
up national Ltd. dustries Ltd. rprises munications L.A.
V.
m Geo-ServiceASA
oland S.A. S.A. il Engenharia sources Ltd.
ques Reunidosváveis S.A. S.A. lsa S.A.
Cimento ketler Grubu H
ya Holding A.Suvi Sanayi A.Srom S.A.
Holding PLC Novi Sad
The Lead
Euro
y
ve GmbH tional GmbH
ent Corporatio
Ltd.
s ASA
e Construçao
s S.A.
Holding A.S S (Petkím) S
dership Dime
pe, the Middl
on Pvt. Ltd.
, S.A.
ension of Glo
le East, Africa
InTMPPAEImFAInCCInInPCInTAOMPMInAInDERBMPHCMInPCOSCP
obalizing Mid
a and India (E
ndustry TelecommunicManufacturingPharmaceuticaPharmaceuticaAdvertising Electrical/Electmaging Food ProcessinAutomotive nformation TeConglomerateConglomeratenformation TenfrastructurePower - TransmConsumer Goondustrial CongTelecommunicAutomotive MOil and EnergyManufacturingPetroleum Media nformation TeAutomotive ndustrial CongDiversified ResEntertainmentRenewable EneBeverages Mining and MePackaging Heating ProduChemicals BioManufacturingndustrial CongPetrochemicalConsumer GooOil and EnergyServices Chemicals Petroleum
d-Caps » 6
EMEAI)
cations g al al
tronic Manufa
ng
echnology echnology
mission and Eods glomerate cations
Manufacturer y g
echnology
glomerate sources t ergy
etals
ucts technology
g glomerate l ods y
acturing
quipment
1
K
Four DistinOur analysInterestingmarkets.
We will exp
AmbLong
CSte
1
Criteria f
ChoosingOur selec Susta
last th Their
emplo A cred
publicrough
Further, tensure gloregions o
Key Tra
nct Traits of Gis revealed thly, these traits
plore each of t
1 bitious with g-Term View
3 C-Suite ewardship
for Choosing
g the right comction thoughtsined growth –hree years. extent of globoyees overseadible scale – ccly listed, theih equivalent.
the number ofobal represenf the world, a
The Lead
its of G
Globalizing Mat the followis are geograph
these traits in
FC
InEnt
the ‘Globaliz
mpanies was ks were design– majority of t
balization – mas. Where this companies hadr asset base –
f employees ratativeness, cond numbered
dership Dime
lobalizi
Mid-Caps Emeng four distinhically agnost
detail and de
2 Freedom and Connectivity
4 nnovation andtrepreneurshi
zing Mid-Caps
key to ensure ed on: the companie
most of the selwas not the c
d a market capas determine
anged across ompanies were in close prop
ension of Glo
ing Mid
erged ctive traits of
tic i.e., our stu
escribe potent
d p
s’
these compan
s displayed a
lected compacase, the ambpitalization of
ed by public, o
the spectrume chosen to re
portion to thei
obalizing Mid
d-Caps
globalizing mdy found them
tial challenges
nies represent
greater than 1
nies had rougition to globaf US$1-10 bill
or if unavailab
, from fewer tepresent a widir region’s con
d-Caps » 7
mid-caps descrm in both dev
s associated w
ted the essenc
10% average r
hly 30% of realize was high ion. Where thle, private sou
than 5,000 tode spread of hntribution to t
ribe and differveloping and d
with them in t
ce of a globali
revenue grow
evenues, asseton the agend
he companies urces – was us
o more than 2home countriethe global eco
rentiate themdeveloped
his section.
sing mid-cap.
wth over the
ts, and/or a. were not
sed as a
5,000. To es from all nomy.
.
Key Trait
Successful are high onsense of ‘no Pure gro Leaders
in the w Quality
through
Key ChallenMid-caps hconcerned readiness thome markvalues alivebiggest hopand the bigare exposed
Freedom anthem from culture, and At the t
leaders. At the o
to act, fConnectivitfocus on teapproach t
Key ChallenIf governanchaos. As athat in the taken into balancing f
ts of Globali
1
2
AmbAmbitivisiona
mid-caps taken their agendao limits’. Hereowth– “increaship positioninworld by 2020y of growth– “h innovative t
nge: Organizahave no illusio
about their oo enable globkets, risks of te while growinpe is that globggest worry is d to a much la
FreeAt suconne
nd connectivi large caps. Thd in their decitop level, shar. Successful coorganization lefail, and evolvty to them m
eamwork acroo internal and
nge: Preservinnce and role cla mid-cap CEO
enthusiasm, caccount. As a freedom with
izing Mid-Ca
2
The Lead
bitious wion inspiresaries.
e an ambitioua, fuelled by ste are three exaase revenue frng– “we antici0” we want to evechnology an
ational capacitns about the wn capacity, lal growth. Mihe unknown, ng in size. A Vbalization will that we werearger canvas.”
edom accessful miected acros
ty emerged ashis trait is reflsion making.
reholders and ompanies emevel, freedom
ve. eans a netwoss the organiz
d external con
ng a culture oflarity do not e
O put it: “A becertain risks o result, opporgovernance a
aps
dership Dime
with Lonsuccessful
us, long-term vtretch targets,amples of howom internatioipate being pa
volve ourselved new produc
ty for globalizadifficult talentlevel of develod-caps voicedand concerns ice Chairman provide an op shielded with
”
nd Connd-caps, frees the organ
s the core DNected in their The concept oboards give frpower manag is part of the
rked organizatzation. Succesntexts.
f freedom whievolve, freedoeliever always r assumptionstunities may cnd clarity is k
ension of Glo
ng-Termmid-caps a
view. Growth , sheer determw leaders articonal markets fart of the top
es to a fine glocts and marke
ation is insufft journey aheopment, and cd risks of losin
about keepinfrom Asia po
pportunity to hout globaliza
nectivityedom is parnizational ne
NA of mid-capmanagement
of freedom exreedom to CE
gement visiblyeir overall cult
tion that avoissful boards di
le avoiding chom can lead to
has a blind sps are not seencome to a sta
key to global g
obalizing Mid
View
and their lon
and globalizamination, and culated ambitfrom 5% to 3020 multinatio
obal companyts”
ficient. ad. They are cultural changg their streng
ng their cultureinted out: “Thgrow much fa
ation - with it
y
rt of overall etwork.
ps, distinguishit practices, thxists at two levEOs and C-suity. ure. Talent is
ids silos with aisplay a conne
haos. o laissez faire apot. So the risn or sufficientlandstill.” Hencgrowth.
d-Caps » 8
ng-term out
ation a ion: 0%” onals
y
ge ths in e and he aster we
culture and
ng eir vels: te
free
a ected
and k is y
ce,
tlook makes
d the dots a
Althomid-cahave a
intbusinessfeel truly
glo
“Most imnot beingive opto young
peopthe ris
-
s them
are
ough manps alreadsuccessf
ternations, only 9y ready fobalizatio
mportant ng afraid portunitig, talentele, even sk of bein
wrongChairman, A
ny dy ful nal % or
on.
is to es ed at ng g.” Asia
The hands-trait in succpersonal inrepresentatand even idthe C-suitethese mid-
Key Challenfacilitate grIt is clear thto avoid mAs geograpleaders neeby organiza‘ownership
Many mid-entrepreneof freedomand they coTheir curreinnovation
Key Challenand managMid-caps riglobalize. S How do
innovat How do
seeking How ca
3
4
C-SuMid-chuma
-on, connectecessful mid-caterest in stimtion and live cdentification ae leaders are vcaps.
nge: Evolving rowth. hat in the globicro-managem
phical distanceed to find a waation member attitude’ and
InnoInnov
-caps indicateeurship. For so
m and connectontinue to be nt manageabl, spanning pro
nge: Preservingement. isk losing thei
Some of their o we keep theting? o we preserve g consistency?an we be syste
4
The Lead
uite Stecap CEOs anan touch.
d style of C-saps. This styleulating innova
communicatioand developmvisible drivers o
C-suite stewa
balization jourment and hene increases witay to ‘stay clors. The answerd encouraging
ovation vation is mo
d their passioome, innovatioivity. Many offocused on in
le size combinoducts, proces
ng the innovat
r innovative akey concerns organization
the innovatio? ematic and pro
dership Dime
wardshnd Chairs ha
uite leaders eme extends to dation and enton of the miss
ment of high-pof the busines
ardship in the
rney, C-suite sce becoming th organizatio
ose’ in a way tr to this challeit across man
and Entore than an
n for innovation was a core f them have sunnovation as tned with globasses, levels, an
tive spirit whil
and entrepreneinclude: focused on th
on spirit while
ocess driven w
ension of Glo
ip
ave a distinc
merged as a direct customerepreneurshipsion of the orgpotential leadess and organiz
globalization
stewardship nimpediments
onal expansionthat is perceivenge may lie inagement leve
trepreneattitude – it
on and preserstrategy fuellucceeded duetheir competitalization enabnd markets.
lst engineering
eurial spirit as
he core while
expanding gl
while being en
obalizing Mid
ctly ‘hands-
distinctive er contact, p, personal ganization, ers. Hence, zation in
journey to
needs to evolvs to scaling upn, C-suite ed as reasonan preserving tels.
eurship
t is an impe
rving their led by the culte to innovatiotive differenti
bles broad-bas
g the organiza
s they grow an
continuously
obally and
ntrepreneurial
d-Caps » 9
on’ style an
ve .
ble the
erative at th
ture n ator. sed
ation
nd
?
le
le
Key Tra
nd emphasi
he successfu
Successfeaders e
approahumafamil
Innovatioat th
evel, ofteof thstat
s
aits of Glob
ze the
ul mid-caps
ful C-suitemphasizeachabilityanity, andy feeling
on figurehe highesen as pare missioement, isuccessfumid-caps
alizing Mid-
.
e e y, d g.
es st rt n n ul s.
-Caps
2
S
Key Traits The four keevolution c
SuccessfulInterestingwith the chsegmentedexamine th
1. Organan
1. Mid
HH
2. If go
HH
3. In th
becoH
4. Mid
whilHH
2
Success
and Associatey traits and achallenges and
l Practices of ly, our researc
hallenges highd these practichese in detail i
nization Strategnd Design
-caps have bigHow do you mHow can you
overnance andHow can you How do you c
he globalizing oming impediHow do you p
-caps focus olst expanding How do you kHow can you
The Lead
sful Prac
ted Challengessociated stre
d these are su
Globalizing Mch study foundhlighted aboveces into the foin this section
gy 2
g ambitions amatch ambitioensure intern
d role clarity dbalance freed
connect the do
journey, C-suiments to scapreserve the ‘o
n innovation globally.
keep the organbe systematic
dership Dime
ctices o
es of Globalizengths that wemmarized bel
Mid-Caps d a range of se and these foollowing four ln.
2. Boards
nd stretch taron with organal talent has d
do not evolve,dom with goveots across the
uite stewardshling up. ownership att
as a competit
nization focusc and process
ension of Glo
of Globa
zing Mid-Capse reviewed in low:
uccessful pracorm the core bleadership dim
3. LeaTalent M
rgets but onlynizational capadiverse experi
, freedom canernance and re organization
hip needs to e
titude’ and enc
tive differentia
sed on the cordriven while
obalizing Mid
alizing M
s the previous
ctices that parbody of the remensions to m
dership and Management
y 9% of mid-cacity? ences – beyon
lead to laisserole clarity? al network?
evolve to avoid
courage it acr
ator and they
re while contibeing entrepr
-Caps » 10
Mid-Cap
section raised
rticipating comsearch outcom
make them eas
4. C
aps truly feel
nd a single co
ez faire and ch
d micro-mana
ross managem
need to prese
nuously innoveneurial?
ps
d some questi
mpanies haveme and insighsier to absorb
Culture
ready for glob
mpany?
haos.
agement and
ment levels?
erve the innov
vating?
ons on their
used to deal hts. We have . We will
balization.
hence
vative spirit
1. OrgaOrganizatmid-caps
The best mwith ambitMatching oprioritizing global grow“we would focus while In building - Some w
spurts o- Some w
critical - Some w
forces, t
79% of inttypically laThe succesjourney emGeneral Eleissues conccomplexity 55% were journey whhome. Others werorganizatio‘admired cogrowth and- Preserv
face of - Taking a- Transiti- Custom
role mo- Techniq
comple
anizatiotion design . The best m
mid-cap leadetion. organization c
their growth wth and hence
rather be big e the markets
organization were aggressivof growth. wanted to remprojects.
were using softhink tanks, cr
terviewed midarger firms. sful mid-cap c
merged as a coectric was the cerning mid-cay with strategi
examining glhile 16% cite
re picking straons. Some comompanies’. Md globalizationation of humaglobal expansa brand from oning from a
mer-centricity odels) ques for streamexity
The Lead
n Stratemust allow
mid-caps ar
ers balance bo
apacity with astrategies wh
e, selecting kein Singapore picked were s
capacity, diffevely scaling up
main lean and
ft structures toross-functiona
d-caps were s
companies areommon practi
only companap leaders. Leic simplicity, v
lobal leaders d local/region
ategies and prampanies were id-caps priman. These lessoan capital andsion regional to gltechnology to(here, major g
mlining and sy
dership Dime
egy and w for upscalire realistic, i
old visions wi
ambition is a kile investing i
ey markets. Foand China tha
strategic and g
erent strategiep by hiring mo
preferred to b
o allow leveraal/business rev
studying the
e agile learnerce. In all, inte
ny cited with assons include
valued human
further alongnal peers for
actices from aalso hiring lea
arily sought lesns included:
d entrepreneu
obal o a market focglobal players
ynthesizing op
ension of Glo
Design ng while prinnovation-
ith realism an
key challengen building org
or example, in an be present gave them the
es were being ore people to c
build a more m
age of existingview teams, e
successes (or
rs. Picking rolerviewed company frequencyd the way GE
n capital, and m
g the globalizlessons close
a range of aders from thssons related
rial culture in
cus s were primary
perational
obalizing Mid
reserving thdriven, and
nd create org
for mid-cap oganizational cabuilding a strin 10 countrie
e scale and gr
deployed: create overca
mobile organiz
g resources whetc.
r failures) of o
e models and panies namedy; it exemplifie
integrated acmaintained a
zation er to
ese to
the
y
Succ
-Caps » 11
he vital DNA open to le
anization cap
organizations.apacity. Someategy for Asiaes in Asia.” Thowth they we
pacity in the s
zation i.e., mo
hile driving gro
one or more
learning from97 such ‘role
ed many of thcquisitions, madynamic appr
79% ostudyi
andcomlarg
from th
essful Pract
A of arn from ot
pacity to deal
. The key to sue spoke abouta, a participanhis allowed there seeking.
short-term to
oving existing
owth through
other compa
m their globalize model’ organe branding ananaged structroach to mark
of mid-cang the su
d failures mpanies, er firms,heir glob
tices of Glob
thers.
l
uccess was t incremental t remarked em greater
deal with
people onto
project task
anies,
zation nizations. nd structural tural kets.
aps wereuccessesof othertypically to learn
balizationjourney.
balizing Mid
e s r y
-Caps
Success
Successfulof globalizUniquenessEven as mocompaniesjourney. Prown journe For many morganizatioTheir innov1. Diverse
includin− Bigg− Acq− Coll
inno2. Innovat
innovat3. Innovat
some B
Mid-caps waddress thThis dilemmorganizatioand regionsmany areasagile. They decision-m
sful Practice
Additio
Ensure le‘copycatThis requstrategiesbut not n
C-suite lturbulenLeaders sspecialistboundarineeds. If
l mid-caps dezation withous can lie in a most participant, they were onoud of their oey.
mid-caps, innonal strategyvation agenda strategies are
ng: ger and direct uisition of newlaboration witovation trendstion goes beyotion as well astion is a frequeoards have In
were balancine dilemma of
ma is a key teon strategy. Ths, allowing thes. Successful cwere centrali
making on mar
es of Globali
onal Perspe
eaders are met’ thinking. uires analyticas in the conte
necessarily wis
eaders at midce.
should also hats must be ables and work icentralizing o
The Lead
emonstrate a ut losing theirmid-cap’s growts were studyinly looking at
own uniquenes
novation is any and globaliz cuts across de deployed to
investments w technologieth research inss ond products s innovating foent agenda itenovation Com
ng local autonf centralizationsion area forhis tension meem to grow wcompanies wezing processe
rket strategies
izing Mid-Ca
ectives and
entally open
l ability to ideext of the orgashing to be lik
d-caps need s
ave the ability le to operate fn (increasinglyr decentralizin
dership Dime
strong desirer special charawth path or sping and learnispecific piecess, the global
n integral partation is inten
different dimefoster produc
in R&D es stitutes and u
– it extends toor efficiency em in Board m
mmittees
nomy with coon and decenr top managemeant providing
with independeere centralizings especially ar
s and local bus
aps
d Inputs
to seeking an
entify learninganization and ke them.”
solid perspect
to coach othfluidly in a gloy) inter-culturng, keep an ey
ension of Glo
e to travel theacteristics orpecific cultureng from admi
es of these commid-caps had
t of their nsifying it. nsions such asct level innova
niversities to
o business mo
meetings, for e
orporate influntralization. ment in setting autonomy tence while bag some areas round HR, Infosiness develop
nd implement
gs (positive anits DNA acco
tive in organi
ers who may obalizing envirral teams, synye out for brig
obalizing Mid
e journey r DNA. e. ired mpanies’ d their
s: ation
sense
odel
example,
uence to
ng the o countries lancing the deto create conormation Tecpment to build
ting lessons f
nd negative) arding to our v
ization design
be having diffronment, to th
nthesizing a gloght talent in o
-Caps » 12
esire to have csistency and dhnology, etc. d market cent
“Mymodel
Avochan
be jusladder
Mknow be and
We dhave
- Vice
from outside
nd build themiew of “learni
n and resilien
ficulties. HR ahink beyond nobal perspectutlying divisio
corporate infldecentralizingand decentratric agility.
y father h at the bon. We wnge so itt ‘flat sar. So we Mary Kay
what wd we aredon’t em our own
our owe President, S
and can stee
m into specific ng from the F
nce to organiz
nd Informationational or regive with sensi
ons, units, or g
uence on g others to be lizing
had a rolbeginningwanted tt wouldnles’, but emulate. Now we want t
e a hybridmulate; wn identitywn DNA.South Americ
er clear of
organization Fortune 500,
zational
on Technologygional tivity to local
geographies.
e g: o ’t a d e o d. e y, .” ca
y
2. BoaIn succestailoring tfocus. Bo Boards we1. Shiftin
globaliof intenationspecialcomplsoughtConsucap BomembHowevremain
2. Focusiterm wcombiwere pperform(iii) taland ris
Setting cleBoards playcontrol. Shclarity need1. First is 2. Second
the C-smanagas onethe ris
Boards areWhat Boarthat succesgovernanceboards acroproblems, aareas of res
ards sful mid-cathemselvesards also di
re adding to g Board compization. Board
ernational direalities, industlities. As risk mexity increaset after at Boarmer and Bank
oard Membersbers and manyver, Board comning lean and ng on the lon
while managemnation creates
prioritizing: (i) mance, (ii) strlent managemsk.
ear roles for ty a key role inareholders ands to exist at t clarity at Boad level clarity suite. Success
gers may be fr Chairman exk exposure of
e connected ads do and howssful mid-cap e, strategy apposs specific arand coaches. sponsibility.
The Lead
ps, Boards s for globalizisplayed the
organization position and is are becomin
ectors and mory background
management, e with globalizrd level. Indusking/Financial s value the objy want to expamposition shofocused. g term. If Boament deliverss strategic capbusiness and
rategic advice ment for the fu
he Board and making freed
nd Boards not two levels as ward level - claris between th
sful mid-cap Bree, they are sxplained: “The
the Group.”
and facilitate w much they Boards went wproval, and bueas and beingBoard meetin
dership Dime
were addinzation throue freedom a
capacity in twnteraction to ng more globa
ore diverse viads, and functiocontrols, and
zation, financetry know-howServices) is aljective guidanand their numould reflect div
ards focus andon the shorte
pacity. Succesfinancial revieon growth an
uture, and (iv)
d Board Memdom a key streonly empowewas found in trity on what thhe Board and mBoards createdupported by BCFO acts as a
connectivityintegrate withwell beyond tusiness reviewg accessible fogs were open
ension of Glo
g to organiugh shifts inand connec
wo ways: reflect growt
al through inddifferent
onal skills andd investment e skill is most w (especially lso importantnce of indepen
mbers or contrversity while
d navigate the er term, this ssful mid-cap ews to measund globalizatio) investments
bers is cited aength as they er CEO and Mthe successfuhe Board is gomanagement d empowermeBoards. Trust a counterbala
y. h the organizatheir statutory
w, these Boardor advice, med to key execu
obalizing Mid
zation capan board comtivity trait.
h and duction
d
highly
t. Mid-ndent ibution.
long
Boards ure on,
as an essentiacan create thanagement bl participant coing to do andi.e., clarity be
ent clarity. Hoin senior execnce to the ma
ation enhancey roles. Apart fs were playing
diators, consultives who par
Succ
-Caps » 13
city. They wmposition an
al pre-condite balance throut also bring c
companies: d the role of inetween the rolowever, while cutives is balanarket-oriented
s their connecfrom their trag other roles sltants on specticipate in dis
“Thmo
quarThe Boaterm - si.e., whcompan
essful Pract
were nd in their s
tion for freedoough enough clarity to thei
ndividual Boales of SharehoCEOs and sennced by risk md MDs and is f
ctivity. Our reditional role isuch as being cific growth inscussions relat
he CEO's onitor qurter perfoard’s is mstrategic here we ny to be
down t- Vice Ch
tices of Glob
strategic
om. clarity and r role. This
rd members.olders and nior
management focusing on
esearch found n board sounding itiatives and
ting to their
role is toarter-on-ormance
more longdirectionwant thea decadethe line.”hairman, Asia
balizing Mid
o -. g n e e ” a
d-Caps
Success
Board succSuccessful reported goequivalent)solution waavoiding remyself a cocouldn’t ovpeople. I ca
sful Practice
Additio
Ensure yoA Board eplans aherepresentambitions
A well-deParticularthe couraIndepend
Leverage If the IndecommitmBoard. If yobjective
Talent anGiven thetalent andOur articlhave thei
InvolvingWhen joineffectivelyunderstandemandin
cession is primmid-caps loooing deep, cul), or manoeuvas the creatioecruitment cutovert mini straverstaff, I empall them my S
es of Globali
nal Perspe
our Board is devaluation is aad. An object
tative, and suss. It will help f
esigned and orly in the fast-age to admit ment Directors
the value of ependent Dire
ment to yours. you find Boardspecialist will
nd organizatioe importance od organizationle, ‘The 3 Roler own vision f
g operational ning Board my, and handle nding of strateng settings are
The Lead
marily internak inside first foltivating one ovring talent intn of young spt-backs, accorategy team,” sployed extremwiss Knives.”
izing Mid-Ca
ectives and
designed to ean important five analysis le
stainable Boarfine tune the r
orchestrated -moving and amistakes, raise
endorses this
Independentectors on yourEvaluate thei
d interactionsl again be help
on developmof managerialn developmenes of the Newfor their funct
stakeholderseetings, operaquestions and
egic imperative all critical an
dership Dime
ally-focussedor new C-suitor two levels bto this positioecialized teamrding to somesays a Genera
mely agile and
aps
Inputs
ffectively confirst step to ened by a specialrd that providerole of the Bo
‘Review and ambitious mide their hand, a culture.
t Directors ber Board have air ability to de to be under ppful.
ent capabilityl capacity and
nt should haveCHRO’ highl
ion and work
s facilitates Bational stakehd objections oves, preparationd may need t
ension of Glo
d. te occupants. below the CEOon. A more unms – also a wae leaders. “I mal Manager. “Srelatively you
ntribute to yonsure your Bolist Board cones constructivard and ensur
Performanced-cap environmand seek suppo
eyond ‘box tica seat on the eliver construcpar, a Board re
y must have d culture for ge a seat at theights critical sproactively to
oard access tholders must con the basis oon, presentatito be honed.
obalizing Mid
Many O (or usual
ay of ade ince I
ung
our ambitiouard is set up e
nsultant can beve engagemenre a diverse ex
e Culture’ mument, leadersort in a timely
cking’ and regBoards of oth
ctive criticism eview or asses
a seat at the rowth and glo
e Board table, skills for the ho build capacit
to informatiocome preparedf business logon, and comm
-Caps » 14
“Tvery se
toes
-
s growth andeffectively to te invaluable innt and contribxperience mix
st stem frommust know th
y manner. Rev
gulatory comer organizatioand handle p
ssment condu
Board table. obalization, indexercise their uman resourcty.
n. d with key poic and rationa
munication ski
The Boareriously s are equ
to themanage
- HR Chief, N
d globalizatiotake your globn designing a
bution to meeon the Board
m the top. heir own limitview of Board
mpliance. ons as well, dopush-back fromucted by an ex
dividuals withr mandate, ances strategist.
ints, present tale. As such, aills in unfamil
d takes ithat theiually heldfire as is
ement’s.”North Americ
n agenda. balization lean, t growth table.
ts and have and of
o check their m your xternal,
h expertise in d be heard. They must
them n iar and
t r d s ” a
3. LeaMid-caps create leaC-suite le The intern80% of the‘Going insidkeeping vittalent for sacquisitionidentify theand track cleaders.
Mid-caps mto create leSuccessful 1. Firstly,
Talentfunctioand to
2. Secondthe higworld cofferedschoolloyaltyvital D
Mid-caps lMid-caps bspecific speand, wherevery attract- They of- They pr- They ar- They ar
dership value their
adership caeaders are p
al pool is thee total). de’ allows midtal intelligencetrategic probl integration peir high-potencontribution a
move talent aeadership capmid-caps buil, they were tra, even at the Bons, divisions,
o strengthen thdly, they weregh-potential pclass formal led individual cols. This can proy with local taNA inside.
look outside wbuild leadershiecializations ne necessary, fotive employerffer high visibirovide global ore gearing welre also investin
The Lead
and Talr internal tapacity. Thei
personally in
e primary sou
d-caps to levee in-house. Sulem solving ta
projects, etc. Tntials. They fond performan
across functiopacity. ld leadership cansferring exisBoard level, wand geograph
he organizatioe hiring locallyprogram to thearning, we saourses througovide significalent and henc
when they neip and talent cot available in
or senior positrs with their olity to internaor internationl on providingng in talent by
dership Dime
lent Malent pool anr internal pnvolved in d
rce of talent
erage investmuccessful mid-asks, innovatioThey also use trm small team
nce to identify
ons, divisions
capacity in twsting leaders t
was intensivelyhy, both for taon’s network. y in these mare local talent.aw evidence oh universities ant side benefce longevity, t
eed talent witcapacity by hinternally. Theyions. Mid-cap
own distinctiveal talent al careers; the
g competitive y providing th
ension of Glo
nagemend encouragool is the pdeveloping
at mid-caps
ent in talent, -caps use inteon projects, these method
ms for such pry the high-pot
s, and geograp
wo ways: to new markey transferred aalent developm rkets and exte. Aside from gof local talent
and business fits as they buthus keeping t
th specific spring from outy usually look
ps are strong ce positioning w
ey also providcompensatio
hem world clas
obalizing Mid
ent ge global ta
primary sourhigh-poten
(up to
rnal
ds to rojects, tential
phies
ts. across ment
ending general
being
ilt the
pecializations.tside ideally frked outside focontenders forwhich include
e more dynamn and rewardsss learning
Succe
-Caps » 15
alent mobilirce for talentials.
. om their role r technical or r leadership taes the followin
mic careers s
Ththe p
taOn
“[Externto mat
culture aindustry
we dodis
essful Pract
ty to nt and
model organsector-specif
alent and are eng elements:
e internaprimary slent at m
ne CEO renal talentch our cand bringy know-ho not havsposal cu
ices of Glob
izations for fic know-how emerging as
al pool issource ofmid-caps.emarked:nt] needsorporate
g specifichow thatve at oururrently.”
balizing Mid
s f
s e c t r ”
-Caps
Success
C-suite leadevelopmespirit in emIn organiza1. They w
high podirectlyemploy
2. Mid-capersondirectly
3. While customstill a pevolvinsales onot juscustom
The ‘humaleaders, if t
sful Practice
Additio
Globalizithe war fThe next gcompeteninternal aorganizatto anticip
Leaders oLeaders wenvironmwith a Chissue, to n
Relevant Newly apqualitativperforma
aders take peent of high po
mployees, andtion leadershi
were directly iotentials. Tasky presented toyees for lunchap CEOs or Chnal interest in y stimulating Big Data can
mer trends, fopersonal mattng customer corganization. Tst for ‘grey hamer contact h
n touch’ was athey are not o
es of Globali
nal Perspe
ng organizatifor customersgeneration ofnce, and connnd external nions need the
pate and meet
of globalizingwho work for m
ments and succhinese employnegotiate a pa
skills and beppointed or prve factors suchnce indicator
The Lead
rsonal interesotentials, innd direct custoip, the C-suitenvolved in thekforces or proo the Board. Ches. hairmen, ofteninnovation anthe spirit in eenable unprecr many mid-cter ‘to know thcontact and lisThey believed irs’ or low-tecabit in his “be
an institutionowners, need t
izing Mid-Ca
ectives and
ions increasins. f leadership exnectivity. This etworks, and
e flexibility to t the shifting n
mid-caps wimid-cap compceeding in theyee, go to Singartnership in S
liefs associatomoted leade
h as the way induring the se
dership Dime
st in identificovation and e
omer contacte leaders weree identificatio
ojects led by hCEOs invited h
n entrepreneund entreprenemployees. cedented respap leaders, cuhe pulse of thstening as a sythat senior cu
chs. One Chaiest and brighte
alized qualityto possess and
aps
Inputs
ngly need to b
xpects to be ‘simplies that tfor that contrevolve, stay tuneeds of mark
ll need to be panies will neeem. A CEO frogapore to atteSilicon Valley,
ed with persoers tend to be n which leadelection and on
ension of Glo
cation and entrepreneur
t. e visible at maon and develop
igh potentialshigh potential
urs themselveseurship in emp
ponsiveness toustomer contae market’. Soystematic habustomer contarman was instest”.
for many sucd exercise the
be agile to wi
self-determinethey want to bribution to be uned to intellkets in innovat
particularly ged to be globa
om Asia soughend an industr
to do a busin
onal steward under pressu
ers exercise penboarding sta
obalizing Mid
rship
any levels: pment of s were l
s, take ployees -
o act was me were
bit in their act was tilling the
ccessful mid-c‘owner attitu
in on two fro
ed’ – to experbe empoweredrecognized. Rigence on thetive and relev
globally mobally mobile anht “leaders whry forum meetess review in
ship should bre to deliver o
ersonal contacge and beyon
-Caps » 16
aps. More thade’ in these c
C-sui
sh
‘omi
nts: the war f
ience feelingsd to make con
Regarding the ground, and ant ways.
ile. d highly adapo can have a tting, then to IPeru or Africa
be a role criteon quantitativct should be gd.
an an ‘agent’, companies.
te leadeare no
hould posdemons
owner atd-cap co
for leadership
s of autonomyntributions towar for custoleverage the i
ptable to goingtechnology condia to resolv
a…”
erion for mid-ve targets. Howgiven due weig
C-suite
rs, if theyt ownersssess andstrate thettitude’ in
ompanies
p talent and
y, developing mers, information
g into new onversation ve a customer
-cap leaders.wever, ght as a key
y s, d e n s.
r
4. CultSuccessfucross-borlocal mar
SuccessfulCharacteris1. Inform
interac2. Severa
with in3. Teamw
Centramanag
SuccessfulDiversity isand nationglobalizatiowas import
An importafree to actThis cultureabout fosteof high pottasks to sur“We identithree projepicked to leproject) - aproject andworking acabout opennew ideas, associated
Learning aTalent is colearn muchhumble. Cooriginated them. The A networke
ture ul globalizinrder informarkets - and q
l mid-caps arestics of this sp
mal learning floction up and dal companies rnternational gwork is preferral Europe highgement decisi
l mid-caps se not just restrality diversityon journey. Cotant.
ant feature ot, fail, and evoe was not justering innovatitentials. Somerface leaders. fy top 30 you
ects which areead each projeand asked to ad go solve it. Itross functionsnly communicallowing expewith that exp
nd sharing is onnected to nh from themseomplacency hin mature coureality is that ed environme
The Lead
g mid-capsation exchaquickly tran
e well-netwopecial culture aows through adown the manreport the neeiants, the neered over hierahlighted how ions.”
ek leadershipricted to gend. This was stroognitive, beha
of mid-caps frolve. t about giving on, leadership
e mid-caps deFor example,
ung leaders wh important toect (maybe no
assemble a teat’s a fantastic s, putting a tecating that theerimentation, perimentation
a key featureew ideas and elves. Ability tas no place. A
untries. We mit works.” Talnt furthers th
dership Dime
have stronnge. The fre
nsfer that le
orked internalat mid-caps ina rich internal nagement leveed to avoid, ored to collaborarchy to get thn his organiza
p and talent der diversity, b
ongly associatavioral, and pe
reedom cultu
freedom to tp qualities, andsigned ‘positiva CEO from A
ho then meet o the business.ot from the diam of six to teway to really am together.”ey are willing and not pena.
e of the organperspectives.
to assimilate wA General Manust be able toent mobility ae learning and
ension of Glo
ng internal needom to earning acro
lly, creating anclude the folnetwork whic
els” as an inter break down,ate more and
hings done viaation, even “pe
diversity. but also culturted with their ersonality dive
ure is that tale
alent but equd the identificvely provocatAsia illustratedand pick two . One of the tirect domain oen people, scoy find leaders -” Other CEOsto take risks w
alizing failures
nization cultuLearning abo
world class leanager from Noo take the besacross functiod sharing cultu
obalizing Mid
networks anexperiment, ss the orga
a culture of colowing:
ch is “small enerviewed CEO organizationaopenly was k collaborativeeople at produ
ral
ersity
ent is
ally cation ive’ d: or hirty is of the ope the - s talked with
ure at mid-caut ‘what workarning is key foorthern Europt practices of
ons, division, aure.
Succ
-Caps » 17
nd promotefail, and leanization – is
ollaboration
nough and flatshared.
al silos. Giveney to success.
e problem solvuction sites ar
ps. ks’ is shared anor which leade
pe said, “Thesemore maturend geographi
“We managto takesystemnot p
encouragte
essful Pract
e arn in s the way. and teamwo
t enough to c
n that mid-cap. ving, etc. A CEre actively inv
nd replicated.ers and talente [sales technie countries andes also drives
say: YOUger and ye over inms. I am penalize t
who tryge the oest new m
- CEO, Nort
tices of Glob
rk.
reate lot of
ps compete
EO from volved in
Mid-caps t need to be iques] d adapt learning.
U are theyou havenovativeready tothe onesy, and tones whomodels.”thern Europe
balizing Mid
e e e o s o o ” e
d-Caps
Success
Innovationmid-caps. Innovation sourced insfunction, caapproach: “something as possible discuss it.’”They partntheir teamsprocess andintellectual Successful Leaders andsignals. Opused to filea General M
Intrinsic mAccountabentreprenebudgetary
sful Practice
Additio
EncouragFor a cult- Talen
Henc‘ego-
- Existi- Leade
appro
To keep oimplemeThis meanto contac
Leaders nextrinsic See our awebsite) f
n spans funct is not restrict
side the organan contribute“It’s not aboufrom you.’ Yoand tell peop
” Innovation teer with univers. Leaders notd implement tl property.
mid-caps belid frontline ma
pen source inne two patents.Manager from
motivation is bility and goal
eurship. Many incentives for
es of Globali
nal Perspe
ge a culture oure of freedom
nt must be opce, more than -free’ teachersing and new ters need to baopriate.
open-source nt the relevans leaders shoct with an unc
need a broad motivation. rticle ‘Low Cofor 11 keys to
The Lead
ional bounda
ted to ‘think tnization – ever. A CEO from t creating thinou must go dople: ‘Listen, if yeams seek divrsities and brint only keep anthe relevant o
ieve that theiranagers are cl
novation can b Today, we fil
m Northern Eu
backed by extsetting extenmid-caps offe
r innovation a
izing Mid-Ca
ectives and
of learning andm and constaen to receivincompetent p
s and coachesalent must bealance freedom
innovators mnt ones.
ould be hot-wconventional id
understandin
ost, High Stakemotivational
dership Dime
aries in many
anks’ or even ryone, irrespecNorthern Eur
nk tanks and sown to the shoyou have a newverse skills andng experts and‘open door’ t
ones, thus crea
r ‘customers dose to the cus
be productive.e more than arope told us.
trinsic motivad to innovatioer public recognd entreprene
aps
Inputs
d freedom font learning to
ng peer knowleractitioners in.
e at ease with m and ‘laissez
motivated, lea
ired to the orgdea and how
ng of motivat
es – Motivatiodrivers.
ension of Glo
globalizing
R&D, it is opective of level orope describedsaying: ‘I needop floor, be asw idea we cand perspectivesd professors into ideas, but aating a culture
drive innovatiostomers to pic. “Ten years aga hundred per
ation. on and gnition and eurship.
or talent to exo flourish: edge and willin their domain
role ambiguitz-faire’ in thei
aders must no
ganization’s into influence t
tional factors
onal Strategie
obalizing Mid
enly or d this
d s open n s. nside also e of
on’. ck go we r year,”
xperiment an
ing (and able)n, talent in glo
ty, and they tr style, identif
ot only keep a
nnovation netthem.
s to strike a b
s for Hiring an
-Caps » 18
“Wy
meeti300 m
our top eedu
innovatibe awarR&D bud
€500,
d fail.
to donate theobalizing mid-
hemselves nefying zones wh
an ‘open doo
twork i.e., kno
alance betwe
nd Onboardin
e have inyearly ening whermanagersengineerucated onions. Theded withdget of €
the sec,000 and
with €3- CEO, No
eir own ‘know-caps must be
ed to build clahere freedom
or’ to ideas, bu
owing which st
een intrinsic a
ng’ (available o
nstalled gineerinre our tos listen trs and gen the bese best wih an extr€700,000cond witd the thir300,000.
orthern Europ
wledge capitale skilled and
arity. may be less
ut also
takeholders
and
on our
a g p o
et st ll a 0, h d ”
pe
’.
3
C-Suite Leaders
IndependenDirectors
Upcoming Leadership Talent/SenManagers
3
What’Profiling t
Styl1. 2.
3. 4. 5. 6. 7.
8.
Attr1. 2. 3.
nt
1. 2. 3.
ior
Styl1. 2.
3.
Attr1.
2.
3. 4. 5.
6.
7.
The Lead
s Next?the Mid-Cap
e Balancing boOpenness to– i.e., translaFacilitative leOpenness toPrioritizing pFor non-ownDirect custoemployees aSolid experieand cultural
ributes Self-governaAcute awareA fundamenpresent, and
Skill in positiFull engagemConnected t
e Personal cusRegular contactive listeniAn ‘open dooapproach wit
ributes Operational present relevAlertness to demonstrateTransfer of pEase with roAbility to opwork in interneeds Readiness toto new roles Deep undersCost, High St
dership Dime
? p Leaders Fo
old visions wito learn from oting learningseadership stylo positive confphysical presenners, demonstmer contact,
and surfacing/ence of centrashifts and abi
ance - check feness of persontal belief in peengaging/inv
ively confrontment with roleo business, cu
tomer contactact with interng to pick up or’ to innovatth an innovat
stakeholdersvant informatthe mood of
e empathy balpersonal ‘knowle ambiguity aerate in a globr-cultural team
o move across and environm
standing of inttakes: Motivati
ension of Glo
or What’s N
th realism ther organizat
s into one’s sple – i.e., givingfrontation - pnce over onlintration of the personally stimdeveloping hi
alization and dlity to coach
easibility of onnal limits – i.eersonal stewa
volving Board
ting Executivee – especially ustomers, and
ct – even if ournal frontlinesimportant sig
tive ideas of dive proposal a
join Board meion and adeptfrontline manlanced with a
wledge capitaland ability to balizing enviroms, and synth
functional, dments trinsic/extrinsional Strategie
obalizing Mid
ext
tions and anapecific contextg freedom yet articularly fro
ne/virtual com‘owner attitudmulating innogh potentials
decentralizatiocolleagues ex
ne’s personal e., knowing whrdship, prioritMembers
Board Membif active in Bo people
tside one’s ros: clear commgnals - even wirect reports -
and how to in
eetings and detly handle quenagers - ability
firm grip on bl’ via ‘ego-freecreate sense aonment, thinkesize a global
ivisional or ge
ic motivationes for Hiring an
-Caps » 19
lytical ability t/DNA avoiding ‘laissm Independe
mmunication de’ ovation and en
on - resilience periencing dif
vision hen to admit mizing where an
bers and manaards of more
le scope unication of c
when under pre- knowledge ofluence them
emonstrate abestions and oby to unite. In tbusiness interee’ peer teachinand clarity in k beyond natioperspective w
eographical bo
al factors. Seend Onboarding
to identify rel
sez-faire’ nt Directors
ntrepreneursh
e to associatedfficulties
mistakes and nd when to b
aging push-bathan one orga
corporate mesessure
of the stakeho
bility to stratebjections the face of turest and culturng and coachirole onal/regional with sensitivity
oundaries and
e the Amrop ag.
levant lessons
hip in
d turbulence
seek supporte personally
ack anization
ssages and
lder/s to
egically
rbulence, ral roots ng
boundaries, y to local
rapidly adapt
article: Low
s
t
What’Organizat Board Governanc
Culture andTalent Manageme
’s Next?tion and Bo
ce
1.
2. 3.
4.
5.
d
ent
Rev1.
2.
3.
Bec1.
2.
3.
4.
Cali1.
2.
3.
The Lead
? ard Initiativ
Build a Boardroles. UndertInvolve operConduct reggreat one.” E(particularly IndependentEnsure leadetheir mandatLook beyondcompetencieperformance
view your orgaConduct an othe current sTest the ‘gloresistance anas importantDesign your growth oppoof your empIdentify the s
come more taWhen recruianalyse patteIf formal learexternal equInvest in furtspeed – this In leadershipSeek cognitiv
brate your talIn designing entrepreneucollaborate aDesign approWhen hiringinnovation foinnovation aIf centralizingbright leader
dership Dime
ves For Wha
d that reflectstake an indepeational stakehular Board eva
Ensure it addrebetween risk
t Directors anders with an orgte, and are he
d financial indes associated we indicators.
anization capaobjective and situation and fbalization eng
nd providing ct as educationEmployer Val
ortunities, freeloyment branshortfalls to blent-sensitiveting, look at rerns in talent rning curriculaivalents (for e
ther educationis a socially re
p hiring, activeve and behavient strategiesrole profiles arship to fit yoand interact woaches to ‘inst, take care of ocused on intend innovationg or decentralrs in outlying d
ension of Glo
at’s Next
s your global aendent evaluaholders and usaluations: “thesses inward atakers and risd focus on divganization-bueard. See the Aicators as sucwith personal
acity and cont fair assessmefuture ambitiogagement’ of coaching/trainn in business clue Propositioedom and entd in light of th
be addressed a – a key to orole model orgdepartures to
a prioritize intexample, custon to bring homesponsible, loyely seek self-mioural diversitys to organizatiand talent devur purpose. C
with other protitutionalize’ eyour innovatiernal efficiencn systems or slizing, ensure divisions, unit
obalizing Mid
ambition - re-ation of Boardse specific Coe most effectattitude (realik managers).
verse composiilding perspecAmrop articlecess criteria fol stewardship
textualize it toent of talent sons. the wider org
ning to embedcontent (the con on your keytrepreneurshiphe compellingand create diffganization buganizations ano peer organizternal knowledomized learnime-grown senyalty-affirmin
motivated, enty and avoid ‘tional upscalinvelopment strheck the abilifiles - and viceentrepreneursve vitality. Pre
cies and markeilos. your talent id
ts or geograph
-Caps » 20
examine the md design as wemmittees to cive way to turstic envisioninAssess the coition during Boctive have a se
The 3 Roles ofor leaders - asduring selecti
o your global atrengths and s
ganization, ided a positive atturrent tenden
y differentiatop. Survey leadeg features of gferentiated/suilding
nd beyond secations and dedge and strateng and MBA s
nior leaders in g practice tha
trepreneurial atoolkit testingg and governaategies, identty of entrepree versa - and tship as necesseserve the critet-facing inno
entification rahies.
mix of directoell as team dycontextualize rn a good Boang) and outwa
ontribution anoard successioeat on the Boaf the New CHRssign weight tion and in des
ambition shortfalls, acc
entifying zonestitude of leadncy). ors such as amers to identify
globalizing midustainable me
ctorial boundaevise remedialegies, give equsponsorship). developing m
at preserves viand innovativ
g’. ance
tify and adjusteneurial leadetest for ‘empi
sary. tical balance b
ovation, betwe
adar stays att
ors, skills and namics. Boards.
ard into a ard dynamics d style of on planning. ard, exercise RO. o
signing of
counting for
s of fear or ership. This is
mbition, y perceptions d-caps.
essaging.
aries. Also strategies.
ual weight to
markets up to tal DNA. e leaders.
t indicators of rs to re building’.
between een systemic
uned to
MethoThe study a
Sampling − Definit
capital− Definit
overse− Geogra
GDP re− Target
Managremov
InterviewA formal inareas were B. All intervspeakers) bnative langadvance tosigned permthe report)
Analysis Coding wasAmrop andby the codicategory notandem by supervisionthe male ge
odologyadopted the ‘g
tion of mid-calization of 1-1tion of globali
eas. If this wasaphical represepresented byt audience seleging Director oved from the p
ing process nterview proto
covered, twoviews, lasting between July 2guage speaker)o maximize rigmission form o.
s conducted md independenting team untiodes by Pante the above pa
n of Professor ender.
The Lead
y grounded the
ap organizatio0 bn USD (or ization: the m not the case,
sentativeness:y the region (Wection: all inteor CEO-level. parts of the an
ocol was deve versions, A aup to 2 hours
2013 and Febr). Interviews w
gour and objecor equivalent
manually, follot research burl a robust codeia NV using Narties – each aMaury Peiper
dership Dime
ory approach’
ons: participatasset base, wajority of com a globalizatio the number o
World Bank figerview participHR Directors
nalysis relating
loped by the pnd B, were diss, were conducruary 2014. Thwere recordedctivity. Confidfrom the inte
owing a categeau Panteia N
ding structure NVivo™ contessigned to a d
rl at IMD. For t
ension of Glo
’ as illustrated
ing companiewhere not publmpanies had aon ambition hof companies gures, 2011) pants held C-sor Vice Presid
g to talent ma
principal reseastributed - thected exclusivehe interviewind and transcribdentiality proterviewee or de
gorization protNV, with the a
was reached. ent analysis sodifferent sectiothe purposes
obalizing Mid
d below:
es were selectelicly listed). round 30% o
had to have beinterviewed b
suite level fundents represenanagement to
archers and use order of the ely face-to-facng Partner wasbed in English.ocols were str
esignate, the n
tocol developadvice of IMD.
The data wasoftware. Furthon of the dataof anonymity
-Caps » 21
ed on the basi
f revenues, aseen stated. by region refle
ctions: 72% wnted only 13% avoid bias.
sed by all intesections was
ce by Amrop Ps supported by. All interviewrictly observedname of the co
ed by the GloThe protocol
s imported inther content ana. All work wa, all reference
is of a market
ssets or emplo
ected the com
were at Presid% of the samp
erviewers. To ereversed in ve
Partners (nativy a note-take
wers were traind. (In the abseompany is no
obal Head of Cl was adjustedto category annalysis was coas conducted ues to a particip
t
oyees
mposition of
ent, le, and were
ensure all ersions A and ve language r (also a
ned in ence of a
ot credited in
Content at d iteratively nd sub-nducted in under the pant are in
ParticThe respon
*A
ipant Dndent base rep
All figures provide
The Lead
Demogrpresented a cr
ed above are in U
dership Dime
aphicsoss section of
SD
ension of Glo
f industries. H
obalizing Mid
ere, we prese
-Caps » 22
nt other relevvant indicatorss.
About
About IM Ranked No(2008-201by the Finaby Forbes, education. and organizissues, buildDelivered fGeneva in SIMD’s top-practical exglobal mind The study wMaury PeipChange, wiAvagyan, R
Contact IMRichard EaHead of Corichard.eam+41 (0) 21
www.im We thankJohan Bauk
www.pa
t the Au
MD
o. 1 in executiv4), No. 1 in op
ancial Times aIMD is a worldIMD collaborzations to held capabilities from the campSwitzerland aranking progrxperience, thodset.
was led on beperl, Professorith the analyti
Research Assoc
MD mes [email protected] 0111
md.org
k Panteia N.kema, Accou
anteia.nl
The Lead
uthors
ve education open programsnd No. 1 world pioneer in eates with indip them resolvand prepare fpus on the shond key locatioams and servi
ought leadersh
half of IMD byr of Leadershipical support ociate.
ons g
V. for their innt Manager, J
dership Dime
outside the USs (2012-2014) dwide (2011) xecutive viduals, team
ve real businesfor the future.ores of Lake ons worldwideces combine
hip and a
y Professor p and Strategif Kariné
ndependent aJos Jooren an
ension of Glo
Ab
S
s ss
e,
c
Wiin CoCoclieat At by MeGlosupHaLuiBriweint Thand
Co Ma
Coma+9
w
and invaluablend Petra Rose
obalizing Mid
bout Amro
ith 83 offices Executive Sea
onsulting. It is ontext Driven aents find Leadworking acros
the global levPreety Kuma
ember of the Eobal Content pport of Amroausammann (Miz Cabrera (Magitte Arhold (
ere conductedterview metho
is executive sud Manisha Ga
ontact Amroanisha Gandhontent and Knanisha.gandh
91 (0) 124 434
ww.amro
e support in denboom, Proje
-Caps » 23
op
in 55 countrierch, Leadershthe largest paapproach to e
ders For What’ss borders in m
vel, the study r - Managing Executive Boaand Commun
op Editorial BoManaging Partanaging PartnChief Operati by Amrop Pa
odology by IM
ummary was andhi of Amro
p India hi nowledge [email protected] 4 4700
op.in
data coding aect Leaders.
es, Amrop proip Assessmen
artnership of iexecutive sear’s Next - top tmarkets aroun
was led on bePartner of Am
ard, and Steffi nications Manoard memberstner, Amrop S
ner, Amrop Braions Officer).
artners, with tMD.
prepared by Pop India.
anager
and analysis,
ovides servicest and Board ts kind. Our rch helps talent, adept
nd the world.
ehalf of Amropmrop India and
Gande - ager, with thes Fredy Switzerland), azil) and Interviews raining in
Preety Kumar
provided by
s
p d
e
©
A
Amrop
©2015 The Am
All icons thanks t
p Office
mrop Partners
to: www.flaticon
The Lead
es
ship SCRL and
n.com. Business
dership Dime
d IMD. All righ
64, Clock48 by
ension of Glo
hts reserved.
SimpleIcon. All
obalizing Midicon colours mo
-Caps » 24
odified.
www.amrop.in