9
The KDD 2008 review process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

The KDD 2008 review process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

  • Upload
    candy

  • View
    20

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The KDD 2008 review process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi. Bid-based paper assignment. Reviewers bid on papers Scale between 3=Eager and 0=not-willing Initial Assignment Globally maximize total bids subject to load, count constraints Easily solved using any LP-package - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The KDD 2008  review  process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

The KDD 2008 review process

(Research track)

Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

Page 2: The KDD 2008  review  process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

Bid-based paper assignment

Reviewers bid on papers Scale between 3=Eager and 0=not-willing

Initial Assignment Globally maximize total bids subject to load, count

constraints Easily solved using any LP-package

Manual inspection and readjustments Effort varies from chair to chair

KDD-08 Opening August 24, 2008 Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi 2

Page 3: The KDD 2008  review  process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

Problems of bid-based assignment Two surprising dynamics

Unfair on papers on hot topics Top few papers had bids from 25% of the PC. Random PC member reads it.

Unfair on reviewers who bid low Old cynics (no eager bids) versus young interested (80

eager bids) Random paper goes to low bidders

KDD-08 Opening August 24, 2008 Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi 3

Page 4: The KDD 2008  review  process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

Manual readjustments not easy Scale: 500 papers, 190 reviewers,

Difficult for chairs to be familiar with the expertise of each reviewer

Tightly constrained system: any change spirals off a cascade of other changes.

KDD-08 Opening August 24, 2008 Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi 4

Page 5: The KDD 2008  review  process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

Modeling reviewer to paper affinity Reviewer profile: abstracts of past publications

Challenge: crawling for abstracts DBLP with pointers to electronic edition + some

manual gathering/cleaning (Thanks to IITB undergrads: Ankit Gupta, Ankur Goel)

Paper-reviewer affinity TF-IDF similarity between paper abstract and

reviewer profile Okapi, BM25 etc tuned for short queries and long

documents

KDD-08 Opening August 24, 2008 Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi 5

Page 6: The KDD 2008  review  process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

The assignment Maximize weighted sum of bid and affinity

subject to load,count constraints

KDD-08 Opening August 24, 2008 Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi 6

Bid score Affinity score

Only Bids 1 1.00

Bid + Affinity 0.99 1.30

Only Affinity 0.35 2.17

Page 7: The KDD 2008  review  process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

Manual readjustments still needed Chairs go over assignments and give input as

Short list of reviewers for a paper Re-invoke LP with additional constraints

Chairs spared of handling cascaded changes But, need a stable LP solver to minimize changes Current algorithm (LpSolve) seems stable

We did three rounds, working10 days non-stop! Coding easy: One week with LpSolve+Lucene

KDD-08 Opening August 24, 2008 Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi 7

Page 8: The KDD 2008  review  process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

Improvements Better modeling of reviewer expertise

Time decaying topic models? Better affinity match

Citation distance? Human intervention is unavoidable.

Good interactive UI tools for paper assignment

KDD-08 Opening August 24, 2008 Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi 8

Page 9: The KDD 2008  review  process (Research track) Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi

Other issues

Author feedback Conditional accept Early notification of sure rejects Vice chairs select PC and assign papers

KDD is homogeneous Topics keep shifting Load balancing across tracks difficult

KDD-08 Opening August 24, 2008 Bing Liu & Sunita Sarawagi 9