26
1 EVLA Vision December 17, 2008 Frazer Owen NRAO The µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

The µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

  • Upload
    halen

  • View
    25

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z. 1) µJy radio properties Radio-FIR relation vs z 3) Implications, future directions. Outline of Talk. G. Morrison (UH) M. Pannella, V. Strazzullo, W-H. Wang (NRAO) M. Polletta (Milan) C. Lonsdale (NRAO) A. Baker, Matt Klimek (Rutgers) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

1 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

The µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

Page 2: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

2 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Outline of Talk

1) µJy radio properties

2) Radio-FIR relation vs z

3) Implications, future directions

Page 3: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

3 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

• G. Morrison (UH)• M. Pannella, V. Strazzullo, W-H. Wang (NRAO)• M. Polletta (Milan)• C. Lonsdale (NRAO)• A. Baker, Matt Klimek (Rutgers)• R. Ivison, A. Biggs (ROE)• D. Shupe (Herschel)• B. Wilkes (CFA)• R. Kilgard (Wesleyan)

Short List of Collaborators

Page 4: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

4 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

SWIRE Deep Field: 1046+59

• Deepest existing radio survey at 20cm (rms 2.7µJy), also 50cm (10µJy), 90cm (70µJy)

• GALEX UV, ground-based optical, NIR, Spitzer IRAC, confusion-limited MIPS (24,70,160 µm),MAMBO 1.2mm, Chandra imaging, spectroscopy.

• XMM, SCUBA2, Herschel HerMES 100-500µm (1st priority) to come.

Page 5: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

5 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Page 6: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

6 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Radio Source Photo-z’s

Pannella/Strazzullo

UgrizJHK3.6µ4.5µ

Page 7: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

7 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Radio Luminosities vs. z

Majority of sources > 10^23 W/Hz, more luminous than Arp 220

Page 8: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

8 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

1) µJysources are

resolvedmedian size ~ 1

arcsecor ~10 kpc,unlike local ULIRGs <

100pc.

Page 9: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

9 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Median Sizes from 1046+59

Large median size for sources continues down to bottom of the survey.

Page 10: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

10 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

20cm Log N –Log S

Log N-log S

continues flat to bottom of survey.

6 sources/sq arcmin.

EVLA: 10X deeper: natural confusion ?

Huyng et al 2005

Page 11: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

11 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Radio SF or AGN ?

Both ~ galaxy size, but different relation to optical light.

M84: AGN (Mechanical Energy) M82: SF

Page 12: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

12 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Relation of Radio and Optical Brightness distributions (GOODS-N)

Page 13: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

13 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Radio SF vs. AGN

Condon et al 2002

Locally, AGN/SF luminosity functions cross at 10^23 W/Hz.

<10^23 SF>10^23 AGN

Page 14: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

Frazer OwenNRAO

EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

14

Generic Radio/FIR Spectrum

Page 15: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

15 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Radio-FIR Relation

For SF q=2.3σ(q)~0.2

Condon et al 2002

Page 16: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

Frazer OwenNRAO

EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

16

ULIRGs (Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies)

L_FIR > 10^12 L_sun

Local examples have radio size < 100pc

(LIRGs > 10^11 L_sun)

Arp220 L_20cm=2.3x10^23 W/HzL_FIR=1.2x10^12 L_sun

Page 17: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

Frazer OwenNRAO

EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

17

Radio-FIR Relation vs. z from Stacking Spitzer MIPS data

• 24, 70 and 160 µm sources stacked at the radio source positions in ranges of L_20cm and z.

• 160/70 µm ratio and error calculated.• Using redshifted templates with different dust

temperatures, rest-frame: T(dust), L_FIR and q=log(L_20cm/L_FIR) are calculated.

24µ 70µ 160µ

Page 18: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

18 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Page 19: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

19 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Page 20: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

20 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Page 21: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

21 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Page 22: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

22 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Page 23: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

23 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Page 24: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

24 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Best fit opt/NIRSEDs

Strazzullo et al

(2009)

Page 25: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

25 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

5) X-rays

Page 26: The  µJy Sky and the Radio-FIR relation vs. z

26 EVLA VisionDecember 17, 2008

Frazer OwenNRAO

Conclusions/Speculations• Star-formation and AGN activity go together: composites• Relation of AGN activity to evolutionary sequence still

unclear but probably not related by a simple, one-time event. Too many star-forming galaxies with AGN evidence.

• Deeper Herschel, XMM, EVLA data should make the picture clearer.

• Deep EVLA imaging will probably be dominated by more extreme star-forming objects. May reach natural confusion.

• Higher resolution radio observations from EVLA, eMerlin and SKA may be most productive path for more understanding.

• Need new imaging algorithms for EVLA /eMerlin to make deep, wide-field images.