Upload
buihuong
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE JUAS TEAMTHE JUAS TEAM
Joël LE DUFF, our former JUAS Director
Séverine GUILLAND,
the ESI Administratror
... and F. Méot
Dr. Angeles FAUS-GOLFE2002Universitat de Valencia
Pr. Renzo PARODI2002Università Degli Studi di Genova
Pr. Heino HENKE2002Technische Universität Berlin
Pr. Luigi PALUMBO1994Università degli studi di Roma « La Sapienza »
Pr. Vittorio VACCARO1994Università Degli Studi di Napoli « Federico II »
Pr. Dieter ENGELHARDT1994Universität Karlsruhe
Pr. Bernard VIGNON / Pr. Roland MADAR?1994Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble
Pr. Etienne WOLF1994Université Joseph Fourrier Grenoble
Pr. Harald GENZ1994Technische Universität Darmstadt
Pr. Ramon PASCUAL1994Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
Pr. Francisco CALVINO1994Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya
CONTACTCONTACTSINCESINCEUNIVERSITIESUNIVERSITIES
THE 11 PARTNER UNIVERSITIESTHE 11 PARTNER UNIVERSITIES
13 SUPPORTING INSTITUTIONS13 SUPPORTING INSTITUTIONS
Dr. Ralph Eichler2006PSI
Dr. Michel Spiro2001IN2P3
Dr. Dieter Trines2001DESY
Dr. Hans Hoffmann1994CERN
Dr. Etienne Klein2002CEA
Dr. Jean-Marc Filhol2002Synchrotron SOLEIL
Julien Bergoz / Christophe Defrance2002BERGOZ INSTRUMENTATION
Dr. Yves Jongen2004IBA
(each year students come to JUAS)
Dr.Th. Frederking2002BESSY II
Pr. Angeles Faus-Golfe2003Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Spain)
Dr.Ramon Pascual2005 Erasmus activity financed by the Socrates Programme of the European Union
(2005 -> 2006)
Dr. Hartmut Eickhoff2001GSI
Dr. Annick Ropert / Dr. Pascal Elleaume2001ESRF
CONTACTCONTACTSINCESINCELABORATORIESLABORATORIES
COURSE 1 : Our students in « Accelerator Physics »COURSE 1 : Our students in « Accelerator Physics »From January 2 to February 3, 2006.From January 2 to February 3, 2006.
COURSE 2 : Our students in « Accelerator Technologies »COURSE 2 : Our students in « Accelerator Technologies »From February 6 to March 10, 2006.From February 6 to March 10, 2006.
Name First name C1 FT C1 PT C2 FT C2 PT Age Sex Nation Institute CityAsova Galina x 27 F bulgarian DESY ZeuthenBarranco Javier x x 24 M spanish UPC MadridBaylac Maud WK3 WK6 32 F French LPSC GrenobleBellodi Giulia WK2 32 F Italian CERN GenevaBetemps Robin x 35 M Swiss PSI VilligenBotta Giovanni x x 23 M Italian University La Sapienza Rome
Julien Wk1&2 WK6&7 32 M French Université Paris Sud OrsayCasavola Paola x x 24 F Italian University La Sapienza RomeCavalier Sophie WK2 WK8 28 F French LAL/SERA Orsay Chaltin Frédéric WK1 WK6 26 M Belgian IBA Louvain-la-NeuveDefrance Christophe WK6,7,8,9 29 M French Bergoz Instrumentation St GenisDelcour Patrick WK1 WK6 25 M Belgian IBA Louvain-la-NeuveDimovasili Evangelia WK6&8 32 F Greek CERN GenevaEuler Matthias x x 23 M Deutch TU Darmstadt Darmstadtfaillace Luigi x 24 M Italian University La Sapienza RomeFazi Mauro x x 24 M Italian University La Sapienza RomeFeghhi Amir Hossein x x 27 M Iranian Amirkabir University of Technology TeheranFerrini Daniele x 24 M Italian University La Sapienza RomeGhorbani Mehdi x 28 M Iranian Mashhad Medical Science University MashhadGiacomini Tino WK1&2 33 M German GSI DarmstadtGolinasab Hojjat x 34 M Iranian Shahid Beheshti University TeheranGvozd Andriy x 29 M Ukrainian National Science Center KharkovHenein Simon x 32 M Swiss PSI Villigen Jimenez Jose Miguel WK1,2,3 M spanish CERN GenevaLallement Jean-Baptiste WK1,3 WK8 26 M French CERN GenevaLancia Livia x x 23 F Italian University La Sapienza RomeLonguevergne David x x 22 M French ENSPG/INPG GrenobleMartin Florian x x 24 M French University Joseph Fourrier GrenobleMehdizadeh Tazngi Alireza x 27 M Iranian Mashhad Medical Science University MashhadMeziane Mehdi x x 24 M French University Joseph Fourier GrenobleNiclas Charles WK8 M French ESRF GrenoblePiravadili Selin x 24 F Turkish Hacettepe University AnkaraPittella Erika x x 24 F Italian University La Sapienza RomePlanche Thomas x x 22 M French ENSPG GrenoblePojer Mirko WK2,3,4 33 M Italian CERN GenevaPonti Cristina x 24 F Italian University La Sapienza RomePourbaix Jean-Christophe WK1 WK6 24 M Belgian IBA Louvain-la-NeuveRodriguez Iker WK6 M spanish CIEMAT MadridSantoni Alessandro x x 24 M Italian University La Sapienza RomeSeyvet Fabien WK4 WK9 M French CERN GenevaSkowronski Piotr WK3 30 M Polish CERN GenevaSlits Ivo WK3&4 WK9 M Swiss CERN GenevaTaleei Reza x x 24 M Iranian Shahid Beheshti University TeheranVahdani Pierayeh x x 25 F Iranian University of Isfahan TeheranWitthaus Michael WK1&2 37 M German GSI Darmstadt
20 15 21 13
Brossard
Students ProfessionalsTHE LIST OF PARTICIPANTS = 45THE LIST OF PARTICIPANTS = 45
G : 4 ; F : 10 ; CERN : 8 ; CH : 2 ; I : 9 ; B : 3 ; Iran : 6 ; Ukraine : 1 ; Turkey : 1 ; Spain : 1G : 4 ; F : 10 ; CERN : 8 ; CH : 2 ; I : 9 ; B : 3 ; Iran : 6 ; Ukraine : 1 ; Turkey : 1 ; Spain : 1
45 PARTICIPANTS45 PARTICIPANTSUNIVERSITY STUDENTSUNIVERSITY STUDENTS : 16: 16 examinations, credits, scholarship = accommodation
Spain : 1 « Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya»Italy : 9 « Universita di Roma La Sapienza »France : 2 « Joseph Fourrier University »
2 « Institut National Polytechnique de Genoble »Germany : 1 « Technische Universität Darmstadt »
1 « Guest scientist in DESY Zeuthen / INRN Sofia, Bulgaria »
EAST EUROPEAN COUNTRY STUDENTSEAST EUROPEAN COUNTRY STUDENTS : 7: 7examinations, credits, scholarship : enrolment fees + accommodation + perdiem of 50 €/week for one ukrainien.
Iran : 5 Sesame Project ⇒ 1 « University of Isfahan of Teheran » ⇒ 2 « Mashhad Medical Science University » ⇒ 1 « Shahid Beheshti University of Teheran » ⇒ 1 « Amirkabir University of Technology of Teheran »
Turkey: 1 Sesame Project ⇒ 1 « Hacettepe University of Ankara »Ukraine : 1 « National Science Center of Kharkov »
JUAS 2001-2006 Students
0
5
10
15
20
25
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
Student Europe
Student non-europe
Student total
PROFESSIONALS FROM LABORATORIES : 18PROFESSIONALS FROM LABORATORIES : 18
France : 1 « LPSC »2 « LAL »1 « ESRF»
Switzerland : 8 « CERN »2 « PSI »
Germany : 2 « GSI »
Spain : 1 « CIEMAT, Public Institute of Research, Madrid »
Iran : 1 « Shahid Beheshti University of Teheran »
PROFESSIONALS FROM INDUSTRIES : 4PROFESSIONALS FROM INDUSTRIES : 4
Belgium : 3 « Ion Beam Application »
France : 1 « Bergoz Instrumentation
JUAS 2001-2006
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
ProfessionnalStudentTotal
ESRFP. BERKVENS
2005IN2P3S. BOUSSON
2003CERNL. TAVIAN x
HCUGEG. BEYER
University of GENTW. MONDELAERS
HCUGER. MIRALBELL
2004CERNR. ASSMANN x
IBAY. JONGEN
GSIP. FORCK
CERNJ. TUCKMANTEL
LPSCP. SORTAIS *
Retired CERNM. WILSON
CERNS. RUSSENSCHUCCK
CERNA. PONCET
2003T. KROYERCERNF. CASPERS
LALJ. LE DUFF
ESRFL. FARVACQUE
2006Replaced T. Stammbach PSIGANILF. CHAUTARD
Universität DortmundK. WILLE
Universita di Roma « La Sapienza »L. PALUMBO
CERNO. BRUNING *
E. SARGSYANCERNA. LOMBARDI
/CEAN. PICHOFF *
2006P. URSCHUETZCERNR. CORSINI
/LPSCJ.M. DE CONTO
2006/DESYW. DECKING *
2006/CERNPh. BRYANT
SINCEASSISTANTHOMELECTURERS
HTSC current leads (LHC)
Concept, design & procurmentCERNA. BALLARINO
Beam Control
- Tools & Principles
- Example : Orbit Correction
CERNM. GOURBER-PACE
Effective Technical PresentationCERNT. TAYLOR
TITLEHOMESPEAKER
SEMINARS SEMINARS
LECTURES, TUTORIALS, GUIDED STUDIESLECTURES, TUTORIALS, GUIDED STUDIESCourse 1 (hours) Course 2 (hours)
L T GS L T GS S
JUAS 2001 55 11 24 58 8 20 0
JUAS 2002 55 11 24 58 8 20 0
JUAS 2003 54 13 28 54 11 16 0
JUAS 2004 54 13 22 58 11 16 0
JUAS 2005 49 15 21 58 11 16 0
JUAS 2006JUAS 2006 5050 1515 2323 5858 1111 1616 66
2007 S1+S2 : L=99 / T=19 / GS=46 (inc. PW) / S=32007 S1+S2 : L=99 / T=19 / GS=46 (inc. PW) / S=3
L = lectures, T = tutorials, GS = guided studies, S = seminarsL = lectures, T = tutorials, GS = guided studies, S = seminars
Spectrum course 1 2003-2006
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
2006 2005 2004 2003
A
B
C
D
E
F
STATS => EXAMINATIONS MARKS - COURSE 1-STATS => EXAMINATIONS MARKS - COURSE 1-
EXAMINATION RESULTS ON " ACCELERATOR PHYSICS " (January 2 - February 3, 2006)EXAMINATION RESULTS ON " ACCELERATOR PHYSICS " (January 2 - February 3, 2006) EXAMINATION RESULTS ON " ACCELERATOR PHYSICS " (January 2 - February 3, 2006)
NAMES SURNAMES
/ 25 / 25 / 25 / 25
1 ASOVA Galina 10.31 12.5 15.0 18.1 55.92 D/18 20.31 21.25
2 BARRANCO Javier 22.00 22.5 15.0 22.2 81.67 A/2 25.00 18.75
3 BOTTA Giovanni 22.00 17.0 16.3 23.6 78.90 B/4 23.44 25.00
4 CASAVOLA Paola 15.81 25.0 15.0 19.3 75.10 B/5 15.63 23.75
5 EULER Matthias 17.88 22.5 20.0 23.3 83.71 A/1 25.00 22.50
6 FAZI Mauro 17.19 22.0 13.8 20.0 72.92 B/6 23.44 22.50
7 FEGHHI Amir Hossein 14.44 12.0 10.0 15.2 51.65 E19 15.63 16.25
8 FERRINI Daniele 13.06 18.5 16.3 20.4 68.21 C/9 23.44 23.75
9 GHORBANI Mehdi 13.75 16.5 9.4 17.1 56.77 D/17 23.44 17.50
10 GVOZD Andrii 9.63 16.5 5.0 9.7 40.81 E/20 14.06 15.00
11 LANCIA Livia 19.25 20.5 12.5 18.9 71.13 B/8 21.88 21.25
12 LONGUEVERGNE David 23.38 21.0 16.3 19.8 80.38 A/3 18.75 21.25
13 MARTIN Florian 11.69 21.0 16.3 14.0 62.92 C/13 10.94 18.75
14 MEZIANE Mehdi 12.38 21.5 11.3 13.6 58.69 D/16 10.94 17.50
15 PITTELLA Erika 13.75 21.0 11.3 13.3 59.33 D15 18.75 21.25
16 PLANCHE Thomas 20.63 17.0 13.8 21.1 72.44 B/7 23.44 22.50
17 PONTI Cristina 15.13 18.5 13.1 19.6 66.40 C/10 17.19 25.00
18 SANTONI Alessandro 15.81 21.5 10.0 16.0 63.35 C/12 9.38 21.25
19 TALEEI Reza 16.50 20.0 8.8 19.9 65.17 C/11 25.00 18.75
20 VAHDANI Pierayeh 17.19 20.0 10.0 12.7 59.85 D/14 12.50 16.25
transverse dynamics
longitudinal dynamics
synchrotron radiation
non-core subjects final
results / 100
grade / ranking
LINACS / 25
Space charges /
25
EXAMINATION RESULTS ON " ACCELERATOR Technologies " (February 6 – March 10, 2006)EXAMINATION RESULTS ON " ACCELERATOR Technologies " (February 6 – March 10, 2006)
EXAMINATION RESULTS ON " ACCELERATOR TECHNOLOGIES " (Feburary 6th - March 10th, 2006)
NAMES SURNAMESRF Engineering Instrumentation final results
/ 25 / 25 / 25 / 25 / 100
1 BARRANCO Javier 25.0 18.8 23.0 22.5 89.3
2 BOTTA Giovanni 23.8 21.9 19.5 17.2 82.4
3 CASAVOLA Paola 22.5 15.8 20.8 19.7 78.8
4 EULER Matthias 25.0 20.2 20.8 22.2 88.2
5 FAILLACE Luigi 23.8 15.0 20.3 18.1 77.1
6 FAZI Mauro 23.8 19.8 16.8 20.3 80.6
7 FEGHHI Amir Hossein Sick Sick
8 GOLINASAB Hojjat 22.5 9.8 12.5 16.7 61.5
9 LANCIA Livia 23.8 13.2 11.8 18.6 67.3
10 LONGUEVERGNE David 22.5 22.3 20.1 18.9 83.8
11 MARTIN Florian 20.0 18.5 20.1 18.9 77.5
12 MEHDIZADEH TAZNGI Alireza 20.0 16.2 16.0 19.2 71.4
13 MEZIANE Mehdi 15.0 15.2 11.8 18.3 60.3
14 PIRAVADILI Selin 17.5 14.5 10.5 19.4 61.9
15 PITTELLA Erika 20.0 13.1 12.5 13.9 59.5
16 PLANCHE Thomas 21.3 17.9 18.8 18.3 76.2
17 SANTONI Alessandro 25.0 21.4 15.3 20.0 81.7
18 TALEEI Reza 25.0 Sick
Conventional Magnets
non-core subjects
11
44
22
33
TITLE(lecturer)
Level Content Oral Presentation
Written Presentation
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
Introduction to accelerators (P. Bryant)
4 11 5 10 12 2 8 6
Relativity revision (W. Decking)
1 14 1 12 2 1 9 5 2 8 5
Electro-magnetism revision (W. Decking)
2 11 2 3 9 3 1 8 7 2 9 5
Particle optics (J.M. De Conto)
2 13 1 13 1 4 10 1 4 11
Longitudinal dynamics (R. Corsini)
2 13 1 13 1 6 6 3 7 7 1
Transverse dynamics(N. Pichoff)
1 12 1 1 13 1 5 8 2 6 9
Transverse dynamics guided study (N.Pichoff)
1 7 1 6 1 3 6 2 2 3 6
Longitudinal dynamics guided study P. Urschuetz
1 10 10 1 4 8 1 5 7 1
Linacs(A. Lombardi)
12 1 1 11 1 2 8 3 2 4 7
Space charge(L. Palumbo)
12 1 11 8 5 3 9 1
Instabilities (L.Palumbo)
2 13 3 11 8 5 3 8 2
Cyclotrons(F.Chautard)
11 1 10 2 2 9 2 1 8 4
Synchrotron radiation (K. Wille)
2 11 5 9 10 2 2 10 4
Linear imperfections(O. Bruning)
7 6 5 8 4 6 3 5 5 3
Non-linear effects(O. Bruning)
7 6 6 7 5 5 2 2 5 5
Injection and extraction(L. Farvacque)
1 9 10 3 7 2 8
Mini workshop(Ph. Bryant)
3 9 2 10 6 3 2 5 3 2
STATS : Course 1 Accelerator PhysicsSTATS : Course 1 Accelerator PhysicsWe had 15 impressions on the programme. Level (A - too high, B – about right, C – too low) ; Content ( A – too much, B – about right, C – too little) ; Presentation ( A – good, B – satisfactory, C – poor)
TITLE(lecturer)
Level Content Oral Presentation Written Presentation
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
Relativity revision (W. Decking)
7 5 2 1 5 1 1 4
Electro-magnetism revision (W. Decking)
7 5 2 1 5 1 1 4
Particle optics (J.M. De Conto)
6 5 1 3 4 2 5
Longitudinal dynamics (R. Corsini)
1 5 5 1 4 2 5 1
Transverse dynamics(N. Pichoff)
1 5 5 1 4 2 3 3
Linacs(A. Lombardi)
5 5 1 2 2 2 2 1
Space charge(L. Palumbo)
5 1 5 1 1 5 4 1
Cyclotrons(F.Chautard)
2 5 1 5 1 5 1 3 1
Synchrotron radiation (K. Wille)
1 6 1 6 6 1 6 1
Linear imperfections(O. Bruning)
5 2 5 2 2 3 1 4 3
STATS : Course 1 Accelerator Physics TutorialSTATS : Course 1 Accelerator Physics Tutorial
STUDENTS' COMMENTS Course 1
1.The location of the School at the Centre Universitaire de Formation et de Recherche d’Archamps (transport, facilities,…)
It should have been better if the courses were taken place at St-Julien; The school was too far away from the civilization and we need the supermarket closer
1.How would you grade your accommodation?Good in the whole, except that the washing machine was too expensive and it didn’t wash very well; Change of sheets and towels in two week step is too long;
1.The School’s facilities (lecture theatre, library, Internet access, photocopying, …)Internet access is too slow; It would be good if all computers were in English language
1.The staff (availability, providing information / assistance, etc…)Séverine and Haidi are wonderful; Big compliments to the staff and very helpful info for the weekend planning;
1.Do you feel the School should propose and / or organise social activities for the students (bearing in mind the School’s limited resources and the different interests of the participants)? What kind of activities?
Yes as much as possible, going the museums, historical places and son on ; The mini-workshop was definitely the most interesting part of course 1; No it’s not necessary, they are old enough to organize themselves; No, but some catalogues and info sheets would help;
1.Would you recommend JUAS in its present form to a fellow student / colleague?Of course; Absolutely; I did already; Yes, but only if they come with car;
1.Any other comments?It was better that we have had more time to study or les classes per day, to be more successful in the exams; Some tutorials should be done on computers simulation software to learn how to use them; Beginning of JUAS was this year very early; It would be good to attach a message to the student information file, to bring the food for the first day;
TITLE(lecturer)
LEVEL CONTENT ORAL PRESENTATION
WRITTENPRESENATION
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
1. Introduction to accelerators and components(J. Le Duff)
1 8 1 8 5 4 3 3
2. Vacuum systems (A. Poncet)
1 17 1 2 16 1 4 9 5 4 14 1
3. Radio-frequency engineering (F. Caspers)
2 17 3 16 12 4 3 8 9 1
4. Design of accelerator magnets (S. Russenschuck)
16 3 17 2 2 10 7 6 8 5
5. Superconducting magnets(M. Wilson)
19 1 17 11 7 7 9 1
6. Ion sources (P. Sortais)
7 10 2 8 10 1 5 14 1 7 10
7. Superconducting RF cavities(J. Tuckmantel)
1 18 1 17 6 10 3 4 9 5
10. Beam instrumentation(P. Forck)
3 16 9 10 9 7 3 13 3 2
11. Accelerators for industrial and medical applications (Y. Jongen)
2 13 4 18 1 7 10 2 3 10 4
12. Future Accelerators(R. Assmann)
15 2 15 2 4 13 2 12 1
13. Therapeutic applications(R. Miralbell)
2 13 3 1 14 3 2 15 1 1 13 1
14. Low energy electron accelerator(W. Mondelaers)
1 14 1 13 1 4 9 2 2 12
15. Cryogenics(L. Tavian)
4 11 1 3 13 8 9 1 11 4
16. Production of medical isotopes(G. Beyer)
2 14 1 15 3 10 2 3 8 3
17. Accelerator in medicine (Ph. Bryant)
1 17 2 16 12 7 11 7
18. High current proton linacs (S. Bousson)
1 13 2 15 1 11 5 3 13
20. Radiation and safety(P. Berkvens)
4 13 1 7 10 1 3 7 8 9 5 4
STATS : Course 2 Accelerator TechnologiesSTATS : Course 2 Accelerator TechnologiesWe had 19 impressions on the programme. Level (A - too high, B – about right, C – too low) ; Content ( A – too much, B – about right, C – too little) ; Presentation ( A – good, B – satisfactory, C – poor)
TITLE(lecturer)
LEVEL CONTENT ORAL PRESENTATION
WRITTENPRESENATION
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
A
B
C
1. Vacuum systems (A. Poncet)
4 1 4 2 1 1 1
2. Radio-frequency engineering (F. Caspers)
1 10 2 8 5 5 4 5
3. Design of accelerator magnets (S. Russenschuck)
3 4 4 1 1 1 3 2 2 4
4. Superconducting magnets(M. Wilson)
5 1 4 1 4 2 2
5. Superconducting RF cavities(J. Tuckmantel)
3 2 1 1 2 1 1
6. Beam instrumentation(P. Forck)
1 8 2 7 2 5 1 2 3 1
STATS : Course 2 Accelerator Technologies TutorialSTATS : Course 2 Accelerator Technologies Tutorial
STUDENTS' COMMENTS Course 2
1.The location of the School at the Centre Universitaire de Formation et de Recherche d’Archamps (transport, facilities,…)There should be supermarket on the place to make things easier; The food was expensive and poor quality in Alliance; Just problems with transport;
1.How would you grade your accommodation?A bit noisy; very good residence;
1.The School’s facilities (lecture theatre, library, Internet access, photocopying, …)The lecture theatre has good visibility, but lighting is not bright enough, so we have some cases difficulties to read the slides; The library is quite completed, mainly with books for the first course what are very useful to prepare the exams. The possibility of internet access, photocopying, printing every time you need is also a very good point in favour to the JUAS; Some computers should be replaced, because of their speed; Some chairs in the lecture theatre should be repaired; The number of computers are low and too old; Working room is missing;
1.The staff (availability, providing information / assistance, etc…)That is one of the best points of JUAS, because they were always available to help you with any kind of problem, doubt, etc, you could have either from the course or other fields. They tried in every moment to create a good ambient between all the students; Very kind and friendly people; Haidi and Severine are still very good;
1.Do you feel the School should propose and / or organise social activities for the students (bearing in mind the School’s limited resources and the different interests of the participants)? What kind of activities?
Due to the fact that the course is quite intense academically speaking, it would very interesting if other activities different from the accelerator field could be done. An idea could be going to spectacles (like theatre, cinema, etc.), in Geneva; Yes, having a picnic, having parties on Friday nights and seminars about history of science; More tutorials and less visits to CERN; More tutorials to help for the studying;
1.Would you recommend JUAS in its present form to a fellow student / colleague?Yes, but advising them that the course requires some effort. And it is totally recommendable for professional staff; Yes of course the whole course was rather intensive but was very useful and good for these who are interested in the field; Yes, I will recommend JUAS to several colleague, it’s a good general view and the lecture quality is good; Not to university student, too specific arguments in little time; No, high content and too little time to study;
1.Any other comments?Thanks a lot for everything; The covered materials is excellent in terms of variety and relevance for accelerator magnets; The speakers in average have been selected and provide the students excellent analysed material. The speakers which I would try to change for the future session because of poor pedagogical competences are: S.Russenschuck, J. Tuckmantel and L.Tavian; I was very satisfied by this month at JUAS; It’s better to increase the practical part of course;
PLANS PLANS
FOR FOR
JUAS JUAS
20072007
WE INTRODUCE PRACTICAL WORKSWE INTRODUCE PRACTICAL WORKS :
* PW @ CERN, 1 full day
- Radio Frequency Fritz CASPERS
- CRYO high temperature Amalia BALLARINO
- Magnets L. Walckiers / W. Venturini Delsolado
Vacuum ? Pierre Strubin
Students will be by groups of 2 or 3 => 8 - 10 experiments.
* Computer Tutorial/Guided studies :
- miniworkshop 1 day J. Payet (CEA Saclay) in charge,
Ph. Bryant, J Pasternak (LPSC)
- magnet design 1 day S. Russenschuk
VISITSVISITS
- Too many visits at CERN : suppressed one
- We introduce 1.5 day for visit at PSI (highest power p-Cyclotron, light source)
- BERGOZ : maintained. Actually a day of practical works, much appreciated by the students
- ESRF : maintained
Courses Courses
=> Too many courses on week 9 - they are in fact not courses, rather seminars. Hence week 9 has been reorganized.
=> A change in “Conventional Magnets” :
A day of magnet design on computers
=> Introduced a half-day off in Session 2 (Feb. 22nd)
JUAS web page JUAS web page
Fully updated
http://juas.in2p3.fr