Upload
haque
View
217
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
119
The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions: A
qualitative analysis of perceptions by age group.
James Simpson
Helen Mortimore
Plymouth Business School, University of Plymouth, UK.
___________________________________________________________________________
Abstract
With a continued suggestion of online replacing offline, this study has uncovered, through qualitative methods,
a variety of benefits, perceptions and implications of direct mail on the overall intention to purchase. It
identifies three key areas in which direct mail can impact the decision to purchase, as well as providing an
analysis of the effect of age on the uncovered factors. It also provides insight in to the situations where it can be
best applied. Finally, it draws a conclusion on the overall findings of this research, which support the continued
use of direct mail as a future advertising method.
Keywords
Offline, Marketing, Direct Mail, Purchase Decision.
__________________________________________________________________________
Introduction & Aims of Research
With the rise of the Internet and growth of the online consumer, Internet advertisement has been an increasing
source of information for consumers (Tsao and Sibley, 2004), with online spend at a record £91bn in 2013
(Rigby, 2013). Marketing overall can be defined as “The process by which companies create value in order to
obtain greater value from the consumer in return’ (Kotler, 2010), as such it plays a crucial part in the success of
an organization. Moreover, with a decrease in direct marketing spend between 2008-2011 (Ofcom, 2012) and an
increase in online spend, the need for comparison of offline vs. online is clear (Edgecliffe-Johnson, 2012). With
increased adoption of the Internet as a purchasing platform and the lack of current literature on the affect of
Direct Mail on the purchase decision, the main objectives of this study were to answer the following key
questions:
Can direct mail marketing still influence the buyers purchasing decision in the 21st century?
Establish how widely spread direct mail marketing is currently being used?
Distinguish the perceived advantages and disadvantages of offline marketing (Direct Mail) from a
consumer perspective
Analyze if Age effects the adoption of Direct Mail as an advertising Medium?
Understanding how has the Internet impacted the perceived benefits of Direct Mail?
Each of the above objectives has been analyzed through a qualitative based approach, using interviews and
focus groups as the main data collection methods. This study looks for depth of understanding as opposed to
generalizable data, following an interpretivist approach, however this study provides some basic quantification
through the manually coding of texts and themes.
Literature review
Various models have looked to provide a structure to marketing, most notably the popularization of McCarthy’s
(1964) “Four P’s Model” by Phillip Kotler (1967). There model widely accepted as the tool kit for marketers
08 Fall
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
120
that includes, Product, price, place and promotion, with an 3 additional P’s added (People, Physical Evidence
and Processes) to accommodate for services (Booms & Bitner, 1981). This study will focus on the promotional
aspect of the marketing mix, due to its strong influence on the purchase decision of consumers. Kotler (1994)
advocates 4 main promotional tools, advertising, sales promotion, personal selling and public relations. Naik &
Peters (2009) add greater depth presenting, direct marketing, print media and radio, in their classification. This
study focuses on direct marketing, as it’s the format at greatest risk from online (Dutta-Bergmann, 2004).
Various academics providing examples of each, Kotler & Armstrong (1998) put forward catalogue-marketing,
kiosk marketing, marketing by mail and direct TV advertising as the main communication tools of direct
marketing. Naik and Peters (2009) provide examples of Television Advertisement as Promotional Channels and
Sponsorship. Allen (1997) list direct mail as catalogues and informative material, but state it must be addressed
for it to be classified as direct mail in Kotler and Armstrong (1998). Print media including magazines, flyers and
posters as there main advertising formats (Kotler, 1998).
With total offline advertising spend contributing £7.6Billion to the UK economy in 2013 and with digital
advertising increasing in uptake (PWC, 2014), There is a strong indication that Offline Marketing is having a
decreasing effect in the Marketing Mix. As such, the purpose of this study was to focus on direct marketing as a
future advertising tool. Direct marketing defined as “Any form of one-to-one communication with potential
customers. With the ultimate objective of effecting the sale of a particular good or service (Adapted from Allen,
1997:10), which indicates the structure for this study, that is to understand if direct mail can still effect the sale.
Allen (1997) identifies the components of the direct marketing as direct mail, direct response marketing,
telemarketing, mail order and direct selling. Berry (2001) further dissects each tool distinguishing Direct Mail as
“Personally addressed advertising, delivered through the post” (Berry, 2001 Pg. 7). Berry’s distinction is one
that will be carried through this research project, as it differentiates Direct Mail from “Junk Mail” – defined by
Zhang (2003) as any mail that is ‘Unsolicited’ and ‘Unwanted’, in both online and offline formats. Moreover,
Berry (2001) advocates the high usage of direct mail, providing a strong argument for its continued use,
accounting for 16% of total direct marketing expenditure (DMA, 2012).
Benefits of Offline Marketing/Purchase
With high usage, academia would suggest there are numerous benefits to purchasing products offline or in
home. Gillette (1970) examined the perceived convenience of in store and in home purchasing, finding In-
Home as the perceived more convenient method of purchase, Berkowitz et al (1979) strengthens this trend
further in their investigation of in home grocery shoppers, finding the main motivating factor behind in home
purchase is convenience. Darian (1987), Reynolds (1974) and Gillette (1970) contradict the above, all
highlighting that no higher purchases were made at home, which emphasizes the need for further research of the
benefit of convenience (Darian, 1987). Another benefit identified by Rosenberg & Hirschman (1980) and
Darian (1987) is a greater product assortment, as catalogues create a greater selection in comparison to in store
formats. In contrast Solomon & Kim (1994) note the inability to examine products as a potential limitation to
television/catalogue purchasing. Moschis & Moore (1982) construct a quantitative study, identifying improved
brand perceptions and increased intent to purchase as the main benefits of television advertising, however it
lacks the depth needed to understand perceptions fully, whilst Kaufman-Scarborough & Lindquist (2002)
advocate comfort and convenience, as the main motives to purchase at home.
Direct Mail
Research into the benefits of direct mail have been limited over the past decade, instead a greater focus on the
online benefits is evident across academia. With the rise of the online consumer, it has been widely touted that
the benefits of Offline Marketing far outweigh its costs (Dutta-Bergman, 2004). Berry (2001) broadly outlines
the advantages of offline but provides little indication of these advantages in practice.
Lariscy & Tinkham (1996) research into Direct Mail found a number of benefits in the context of political
campaigns 1) Direct mail increased the percentage of votes amongst the non- incumbents; 2) Direct mail created
greater targeting of consumers to grant them more competitive offerings. To counter the above, Akaah (1995)
research provides a contradictory view of Direct Mail, stating it as “Junk Mail” and invades consumer privacy,
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
121
in their study on consumer attitudes, therefore a split amongst academia exists. Finally, Briggs & Borin’s
(2005), case specific Ford F-150 launch campaign provides evidence that magazine advertisement creates
significant return on investment in the case of Ford. Bergemann (2010) later agree with these findings, stating
Direct Mail allows for greater customer targeting. More recently Santana (2013) identifies that consumers
remember more information from Print media in comparison to online media. The above literature has exposed
various advantages to offline direct methods of advertising, however with much of the research conducted prior
to the Internet it opens the opportunity for up to date research of the perceived benefits, forming the structure for
one of the research objectives - Understanding how has the Internet impacted the perceived benefits of Direct
Mail?
Online Marketing
Literature surrounding online marketing is relatively new to the world of academia, as the Internet and e-
commerce have risen most notably in the past decade. Most broadly E-Marketing can be defined as: “The use of
electronic data and applications for planning and executing the conception, distribution and pricing of ideas,
goods and services to create exchanges that satisfy individual and organizational goals” (Strauss and Frost,
2001: 454), this proposes a much broader scope to online marketing than just promotion and looks to
incorporate all 4 elements of the promotional mix (Kotler, 1967). Shah (2001) narrows the breadth of E-
Marketing coining who the term “Internet Marketing”, establishing a direct link between the Internet and its
impact on the marketing function. Jones (2005) provides clarity to Internet marketing structure, suggesting four
tools, social media, website advertisement, search engines and email marketing. Social Media sites have seen
increased usage, Twitter with 500Million users (Twitter, 2015) and Facebook 1.23 Billion users worldwide
(Guardian, 2014). In the context of advertisement spend, UK Digital Ad spend grew 15% year on year to
£6.3Billion in 2013. With mobile spending now contributing £1 in every £6 of spend (PWC, 2014).
Benefits of Online-Marketing
A strong argument is that organizations substitute offline methods (Direct Mail; Print Media; Direct Calling)
with the use of online methods (Social Media; Websites; Email) (Klein and Ford, 2003). Most recent studies
focus on a comparison of alternatives, with strong suggestions that online will replace offline (Dutta-Bergman,
2004). Kiang (2000) research into the benefits of online marketing approach was conducted at a time when the
Internet will still in its infancy, academia presenting three advantages where the Internet can benefit an
organization - Communication, Transaction and Distribution. Communication advantages are highlighted as
improved interactivity between marketer and consumer and stronger relationship with customer (Peterson Et Al,
1997). Transaction benefits include improved visibility and a substantial reach with one single campaign.
Furthermore, online allows for easier customization and flexibility (Long, 1997). Distribution benefits
including, fewer intermediaries needed to distribute the same content online. E.G no requirement for a printers
or logistics firm to distribute catalogues, resulting in lower costs (Edwards, 1998). Later research by Pinheiro
(2013) adds the further benefits to an organization as increasing knowledge, easier measurement of
effectiveness and is a user- friendly tool. Bayo-Moriones (2007) identifies the advantages from a consumer
perspective as product diversity, competitive pricing and convenience as the main drivers for information
technology.
Direct Marketing as a Future Marketing Medium
Since the rise of the Internet there has been an increased literature in comparing offline and online marketing.
Jones et al (2005) takes a psychological approach to research, contrasting the printed page to the computer
screen, focusing on memory as opposed to intent to purchase, which puts forward the theme that paper based
advertisement is more effective for long term memory, however it lacks incorporation of the purchase decision
in the research. Danaher (2011) work focuses more on perceptions in his literature Comparing perceptions of
marketing communication channels", include a basis of opinion on the differential between various marketing
tools. Direct marketing scoring second highest on the basis of purchase intention, providing strong evidence
towards direct marketing as a future medium. For this study, this evidence would suggest hat even in the wake
of the Internet, consumers are still actively adopting direct marketing as there preferred medium. However,
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
122
being conducted in Australia, this research has limited applications to the UK consumer, as culture is a huge
determinant in consumer choice (Yakup, 2011). Danaher (2011) work will form the basis for this study, but will
uncover more clarity to direct mailing as a marketing tool.
Leeflang Et Al (2000) counters the above, arguing that direct mail does not have a place in the future, their
research highlighting a considerable right distribution skew, indicating a considerable proportion of the
population having no intention to purchase through the mail. However, later research from Leeflang Et Al
(2013) counters their previous opinion to identify a direct mail-prone consumer, establishing a link between
socio-economic group and preferences of marketing communications. Through a quantitative testing of
hypothesis they find 1) Younger people are more likely to be direct mail prone and 2) Younger individuals are
more likely to purchase through direct mail, which contradicts the view of Barnes & Peters (1982) and Greco
(2011) that highlight 60-74 as the main users of direct mail. The limitation of the research is the location of the
sample, being a Dutch study; its applications are limited to the UK population. Moreover, Leeflang Et Al (2000;
2013) fail to define age categories, only using the subjective terms ‘Young’ and ‘Old’. Therefore, based on the
limitations and trends of previous research, the objective will be to obtain depth and understanding of the UK
consumer.
The Buying Process
As Kotler (2010) puts forward in his definition of marketing “The process by which companies create value in
order to obtain greater value from the consumer in return’, it can be suggested that marketing is a ‘process’
which the consumer follows. Overall the decision making process, can be defined as a broad organized set of
structures that reflect the basic process of decision making from certain viewpoints and within certain contexts
(Walters, 1972; 42 Cited In Erasmus, 2001; 84). Various models being constructed to arrive at a generalized
process for the decision making process (Erasmus et al, 2001).
The buying process is an area of research that has continually been of interest to researchers. The most widely
used models of consumer behaviour evolved during the 1960’s and 70’s, as academics started to research theory
as opposed to marketers (Erasmus et al, 2001), due to the lack of consumer theory around this time. Howard
(1969) was first to propose a theory of consumer purchase decision, with their model of consumer purchase
theory (Howard, 1989; Du Plesis et al, 1991). Further models from Howard & Sheth (1969), Engel, Blackwell
& Miniard (1968) and Andreason (1965) form the basis of literature today. The work of Simon (1959) must also
be noted, his three-stage model setting the foundations for newer research. Although explanations of the buying
process may vary, five main stages to the process are accepted across all models (Mitchell and Boustani, 1994;
Lee, 2005).
More recently, Kotler et al (1990) proposed the black box model, a theory that identifies a range of cultural,
social, personal and psychological characteristics that affect the decision to purchase. Each of the models
advocate the idea that stimuli or factors affect the decision to purchase, this literature review will focus on two
of the most predominant and developed models since the work of Simon (1959), the Theory of Buyer Behaviour
(Howard & Sheth’s, 1969) and Model of Consumer Decision (Engel-Blackwell-Miniard, 1990).
Theory of Buyer Behaviour
Howard & Sheth (1969) proposed a 4-stage model to the consumer decision process. Inputs, perceptual
constructs, learning constructs and outputs, their model being the first to propose an effect of Stimuli on the
decision to purchase. Inputs are the first stage at which stimuli affect the consumer, categorising three forms of
input stimuli:
Symbolic Stimuli: Are the verbal and non-verbal characteristics of the product the consumer intends to
purchase.
Significative Stimuli: Are the physical characteristics of the product and information provided on the
product, by marketers.
Social Stimuli: Influences that come from the individual’s social environment, such as information
from friends and family.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
123
Each stimulus having an impact on the way consumers decide to purchase (Batra, 2009). Sheth (1975; 44) later
emphasises the importance of inputs on the decision making process, citing “The availability of information” as
a primary factor in the decision making process With information playing a crucial part in the purchase decision
process, it is of particular interest for marketers looking to increase product uptake. As such, identification of the
affect of information via direct mail will be a key objective of this research project. With this model
contributing concepts on how marketers can influence the decision.
Constructs are separated into two forms, perceptual and learning constructs, perceptual constructs are the factors
which deal with the psychological constructs affecting the consumer whilst contemplating their decision, based
on the inputs provided. Learning constructs include information about competing brands, preferences and
buying intentions (Sheth, 1975). The final stage of output, involves the actual purchase of the intended item,
after evaluation of all alternatives based on the inputs provided, Sheth (1969). The incorporation of social,
psychological and marketing influences is commented as a benefit of this model (Bray, 2008; Loudon & Della-
Bitta 1993). Although this model provides the concept that marketing effects the decision, it fails to identify the
what, how and when marketing has an impact. A limitation this research aims to improve, identifying the ‘how’
and ‘what’ influences purchase. Further critique by Newman (1972) questions the validity of the model, due to
its lack of empirical data, instead using scientific methods to test hypothesis (Haines 1970, Bray 2008 & Hunt
1972). Horton (1984) counters the above argument, suggesting the model is comprehensive model, as a result of
empirical research.
Consumer Decision Model
Engel-Blackwell-Miniard first proposed their theory of Consumer Decision in (1990) in their book titled
consumer behaviour. Their model as with the Theory Of Buyer Behaviour (1990) worked on a fundamental
stage structure, adding a fifth stage “post evaluation” stage to complete the Consumer Decision Model. The post
evaluation stage plays a crucial role for marketers, as it’s at this point where consumers evaluate the received
information for future purchases (Schiffman & Kanuk, 1994). Further to the post information evaluation,
marketers can also effect the decision through ‘Stimuli” during the early evaluation stages (Lindholm, 2008).
Engel-Blackwell-Miniard (1990) differentiates information sources in two categories I) Internal ii) External.
Engel-Blackwell-Miniard (1990) differentiate the internal sources information as past experiences, word of
mouth and memory, in comparison external sources of information can come from various sources, including
leaflets, mail, online and other information sources. Marketers have little immediate influence on the pre-
existing past internal information, due to this already being present in the consumers mind set, the way in which
they can influence the purchase decision is through the 4P’s marketing mix (Product, Price, Place and
Promotion). Promotion can be defined as the activities that an organisation performs in order to connect and
transfer information with potential and actual customers (Kotler, 2002). With advertisement expenditure
approximately £21.5billion in 2012 (Oliver & Ohlbaum Associates Ltd, 2013), it is key for organisations to
fully understand the perceptions of each.
Amongst academics there is an increasing argument that the above models provide a generalised view of the
process (Erasmus et al, 2001). Hoyer (1984) and Dí Astous et al (1989) proposed that the models of Sheth
(1969) and Engel (1968) ignore the influence of purchase dimensions such as the importance of purchase,
suggesting the greater the importance of the purchase, the more complex the decision process (Du Plessis &
Rousseau, 1999). Cox et al (1983) and Erasmus et al (2001) advocate Hoyer’s (1984) concept of to idealise, in
that they suggest consumers follow exact processes, Cox and Erasmus counter this ideology suggesting
numerous other factors influence the decision. Olshavsky and Granbois (1979) and John & Whitney (1982)
suggest that consumer models could be simplified much further. Arguing that the average consumer passes
through the decision process far quicker than suggested, providing an overcomplicated version of the process
(Erasmus et al, 2001).
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
124
How Marketing (Promotion) Effects the Purchase Decision
Howard & Sheth (1969) & Engel-Blackwell-Miniard (1990) both agree that information plays a crucial part in
the consumer decision process, classifying information as ‘Stimuli. However these models lack explanation on
how the Marketer can directly effect the purchase decision. Lariscy et al (1995) work on these limitations,
finding) Increased direct mail distribution enhances the decision to vote 2) Using multimedia campaign
outperforms that of a single media campaign. Kijewski et al (1993) research contradicts this view finding 1)
‘direct impact of offering information on buying intention was negative’, however they are first to note the
validity issues in their research. Their variables “Offering Information” and “Company Reputation” not clearly
defined from the offset. Later studies by Weng et al (2013) research broadly evidences that consumer buyer
behaviour is impacted by various promotional activities, but fails to identify which advertisement technique is
preferred. Therefore, further research is needed to distinguish the influence marketing can have on the consumer
in an age of increased Internet usage.
Perceptions of Direct Mail
Research on perceptions and attitudes towards promotional methods have increased in momentum, as academics
begin to discover the impact of perceptions on motive to purchase (Lutz, 1985). Various studies have attempted
to measure the perceptions of attitudes amongst students (Sandage & Leckenby, 1980; Meuhling, 1987)
comparing them on a cross-cultural basis (Mehta, 1995). Akhter & Durvasula (1991) typically identify two
types of perceptions to direct mail, favourable and unfavourable. This rather broad classification of perceptions
is too general to benefit marketing professionals. Early work by Korgaonkar (1984) found in his study of older
individuals that consumer perceived in home shopping to be more convenient, furthermore identifying the price
conscious consumer as a higher user of direct mail. Finally Akaah et al (1995) suggests that any perception of
direct mail is dependent on the shopping orientation of the consumer. For example, consumers that dislike
receiving mail are more likely to perceive Direct Mail as “Junk Mail” (Pg. 217). This project adopts an
interpretivist stance, building on the limitations of depth in previous studies. Finally, analysing various
perceived benefits of promotional methods will contribute highly to organisations, a key objective of this study.
How Can Perceptions Affect The Decision To Purchase?
Perceptions are areas that have been researched across a variety of industries. Shukla (2012) investigated the
“The influence of value perceptions on luxury purchase intentions” with an analysis of consumers from four
countries (USA, UK, India and Malaysia). Identifying a positive correlation between favourable perceptions and
the intent to purchase, however finding distinct differences amongst nationalities. This view counters the view
of Hoftstede et al (1999) who suggests that perceptions are homogenous across nations and populations. From
an advertising perspective, Wells et al (2011) analysis of website perceptions on perceived quality further found
that favourable perceptions, improved the perceived quality of products. Chen et al (1998) research has the
greatest application to this study, finding that improved perceptions increased the intent to purchase amongst
individuals. Moreover, that promotion acceptance is improved when perceptions are favourable. As such, it can
be deducted that improved perceptions of marketing techniques will 1) improve the acceptance of that
advertisement and 2) Increase the intent to purchase.
Effect of Age on Media Preferences
Earlier studies of in home shopping preference have regularly shown that younger consumers have a greater
preference for purchases in home or directly (Greco and Fields, 2011). Gillet (1976) identifies no relationship
between age, transportation method or presence of young children, in his study of in home shoppers. Settle et al
(1994), later discovering similar results in there survey of consumer perceptions, significantly, “The total image
ratings for the other four mail/ phone order shopping media did not differ although the profiles did vary
slightly”. Darian (1987) study of in home shopper contradicts the above patterns finding 1) “those over 65 years
are less likely to shop via direct mail than those under 50” and 2) “Younger individuals are more likely to shop
at home”. Older studies have focused on primarily on the purchase behavior of women (Darian 1987;
Cunningham 1973 and Gillet 1973), as such a limiting factor in their overall application to the population.
Another limiting assumption of this research is its Age, as the Internet wasn’t a factor that could effect purchase
decision during the 1980’s.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
125
A more recent study Bachman Et Al (2010) research looked at the effects of age on media consumption within a
political voting environment. This study highlights a clear distinction between the preferences of offline media
for older participants in comparison to their younger individuals. Proposing preference for offline advertising
increases with age. These findings forming the basis of Hypothesis 1 of intended research – “As age increases
favourable perceptions for Direct Mail will increase”. This literature is limited in its applications to predict
Direct Mail it uses newspaper and television as the two media formats, although provides some suggestion
towards offline vs. online preferences. To increase its applicability, a wider range of media sources such as
direct mail, posters, catalogues and leaflets would have to be considered to fully understand the correlation
identified by Bachman Et Al (2010). Holt Et Al (2013) research achieves this to an extent, establishing
relationships amongst news media, by incorporating the effects of social media within a political participation
environment. Underlining a direct correlation between age and media platform, with social media becoming an
increasing. As age increased the need for offline media increased, social media usage decreasing in older age
groups. The strong inconsistency amongst academia provided the justification for the analysis of age in this
study.
Justification for Study
From the reviewed literature, there are clear benefits of Offline marketing and in particular Direct Mail.
However, research has been limited over the past 10 years Berry (2001), Akaar (1995) and Lariscy Et Al (1996)
providing to be the most significant studies in the past 20 years. In comparison numerous more recent studies
(Pinheiro, 2013; Bayo-Moriones, 2007; Kiang 2000) have been conducted on the perceived benefits of Online
Communication methods. This lack of modern research opens the opportunity for further research for the effects
of Direct Marketing in the 21st century. Moreover, from analyzing literature it would suggest marketing could
influence the buying decision, but lacks the discovery of “How” an objective this research will determine.
Research Methodology
Research has been defined as a “Systematic Investigation, designed to develop or contribute to generalized
knowledge” (Burns, 1997; Mackenzie, 2006). The process of research involves intellectualising an identified
problem, setting the research question, collecting data and analysing the collected data (Bogdan and Taylor,
1975). Denzin and Lincoln, (1994) identify a 5-stage process when selecting the method of research design. To
start the researcher must identify whether a quantitative or qualitative approach is applicable to research
objectives. Second is to identify the research paradigm, with research paradigm shaping the intent and
expectations of the research (Mackenzie, 2006). Third is to link the chosen paradigm to the research, through
construction of the research methodology. Guba and Lincoln’s (1989, 2005) categorize paradigms as the “views
that reflect the researchers assumptions about reality and methodology”. The final two stages involving
selection of data collection method and choice of analysis method, Denzin and Lincoln (1994) 5-stage process
providing the structure for this section.
Research Philosophy
Various suggestions for a definition of paradigm have been proposed. Kuhn (1996) terms the concept as ‘an
entire constellation of, values, techniques and beliefs ’ (Kuhn, 1996, p.175). In contrast Guba (1990, p. 17)
termed the concept as ‘World Views’ that are ‘A basic set of beliefs that guide research action’ later adding
ontologically and epistemologically consideration in there definition (Guba and Lincoln, 1994:105). Overall, it
can be suggesting that different philosophical assumptions lead to different research and methodological design
(Mertens, 2012). Amongst social sciences three general ‘World Views” or “Philosophical approaches” exist
Povisitist, Constructivist/Interpretivist and Pragmatist (Creswell, 1990). Lincoln and Guba (2000) distinguishing
each of the above paradigms on the basis of three central questions (ontological, epistemological and
methodological), with every paradigm based upon its own ontological and epistemological ideals (Scotland,
2012). Broadly Mack (2010) defines a positivist approach as the scientific paradigm (Pg.6), with the purpose of
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
126
statistically representing generalized findings. The Interpretivist approach also referred to as ‘Anti Posivitist’
due to it being developed in reaction to the posivitist approach (Mack, 2010).
Ontology
Ontology can be defined as the study of being (Crotty, 1998, p. 10). Ontological positions are based on what
formulates reality, Scotland (2012) defining it as the “What Is” of the research paradigm.
The positivist ontology argues reality as being “out in the world” to be discovered using constructive
methodologies (Bassey, 1995 & Tuli, 2010). A positivist perspective of ontology therefore is that of realism
(Scotland, 2012). Positivists consequently argue that reality is not expressed by our senses, but by factual
statements (Mutch, 2005). As such, the world exists by quantifiable fact and researchers can use a quantitative
approach to discover it (Cohen, et al, 2007). Creswell (2003; 14) suggesting experiments and surveys
questionnaires and structured interviews, as the methods to obtain generalizable date from the population
(Babble, 1990).
The Interpretivist ontology counters the view that reality is simple enough to observe through accepted rules,
irrespective of human interaction (Tuli, 2010 & Saunders, et al 2012). An interpretivists approach argues
relativism, the view that reality is individual and differs across populations (Guba & Lincoln, 1994). Opposing
positivists, in that reality is constructed by our senses, claiming without perceptions the world would be
meaningless (Scotland, 2012). Reality is thus a human construct (Mutch, 2005). The role of an interpretivist
researcher is consequently “Understanding and demystifying social reality through understanding” Cohen et al
(2007, p. 19). This suggests that reality varies on an individual level, with qualitative methods providing the
depth needed to understand separable differences (Tuli, 2010). A pragmatist approach would argue the
researcher is free from the forced choice of post positivism and constructivism as a chosen research paradigm
(Creswell & Plano Clark, 2007, p. 27 & Feilzer, 2010), researchers aren’t prisoners of a particular method
(Robson, 1993, p. 291). With pragmatism offering an alternative ‘World View’ to positivism and interprivitism,
focusing on finding the ‘truth’, whether that requires a Qualitative or Quantitative approach (Dewey, 1925).
Epistemology
Epistemology as defined by Crotty (1998, Pg. 3-10) is the study of ‘What know and how we know it’. An
interpretivist epistemological therefore advocates that reality is relative (Hudson and Ozanne, 1988) and
knowledge is socially constructed and perceived (Berger and Luckman, 1967, p. 3). Their research aims for less
rigidity, through the adoption of flexible research structures (Carson et al., 2001), to fully reconcile the
perceptions of reality. Therefore, the objective of an interpretivist researcher is to capture report and interpret
data to identify relevant perceptions, views and attitudes of the population (Neuman, 2000 & Hudson and
Ozanne, 1988). In comparison, positivist’s dispute there is a single objective reality that exists in society for a
researcher to discover, leaning towards more rigid structures, in order to statistically generalize a single reality
(Easterby-Smith et al, 2012).
Methodological Assumptions
Methodological assumptions shape the way the researcher goes about finding out what is known (Guba and
Lincoln, 1994, p.108). Within social sciences there are strong arguments for both Quantative and Qualitative
tools. Quantitative data collection methods form the basis of positivist research paradigm (Travers, 2001),
obtaining quantifiable data to test hypothesis. Qualitative research is usually inductive, in that allows researchers
to gain broader, less specific generalisations of the population, instead understanding is deeply described (Cohen
et al., 2007; Farzanfar, 2005) supporting an Interpretivist approach, however it can be used to test a hypothesis
in a positivist paradigm of inquiry (Babbie, 2001).
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
127
Research Approach
This research will undertake an interpretivist approach, as this is what shapes reality (Robson, 2002). As this
research looks to understand the attitudes, ideas, motives and purchase intentions, a qualitative research
approach best suiting the objectives of this research (Kitzinger, 1995).
An interpretive methodology aims to gain new understanding from an individual’s perspective, through
investigation of interactions, perceptions and experiences amongst individuals, as well as the historical context
that people occupy (Robson, 2002; Creswell, 2009, p. 8; Tuli, 2010). Thus, the purpose of this study is to
understand ‘new’ and ‘undiscovered’ perceptions. In contrast the positivist approach argues that it is ‘Reality’ is
already pre determined and therefore cannot be shaped. In addition, Bryman (2012) favours the use of
qualitative methods in an interpretivist approach, as it gains a more conclusive understanding of individual’s
behaviour, rejecting a quantitative approach due to its failure to provide explanations to human behaviour.
Moreover, a preference for qualitative methods is made when examining real life contexts and where claimed
and actual attitudes vary (Belk, et al 2005; Sinkovics, Penz, & Ghauri, 2005; Sykes, 1990). Sample size also
differs between approaches, the positivist approach employing larger samples sizes in order to achieve
generalizability (Gray, 2014), interpretivists adopting smaller sample sizes, to achieve more in-depth data
(Gerring, 2007).
The split between positivist and Interpretivist approaches in the field of consumer research has been of strong
debate. Hunt (1991) explored the idea that Positivist approaches are favoured in the field of consumer research,
concluding that no favoured approach dominated the field. Shankar & Patterson (2001) advocating Hunt’s
(1991) research, stating, “The dominant position within consumer research has been, and still is, occupied by
positivism and its variants” (Pg. 482). They propose an emerging trend towards a more diverse mix of
paradigms in the future. Chung & Alagaratnam (2001) acknowledging Shanker & Patterson’s (2001) work and
studying the patterns of paradigms in Marketing Research, explaining the reason for a scarcity of qualitative
marketing research due to the ‘lack of managerial applications’ (Calder, 1977).
This research follows Bryman (2012), as it aims to explain how direct marketing can influence the purchase
decision. Qualitative research typically generates more descriptive data, useful in obtaining more individual and
in depth data regarding people’s opinions on a particular subject (Dey, 1993). Due to the lack of opinions based
research on direct marketing in the 21st century are relatively unknown, a qualitative approach will generate the
depth needed to establish current opinions (Kitzinger, 2005). Focus groups and Semi-Structured Interviews will
be the tools used for data collection.
Methodology
Focus groups originate as a research method with Bogardus (1925) who adopted them as a research method in
his work with the social sciences. A primary objective of focus groups is “Obtaining a range of perspectives on
the same topic, in participants own words” Litosseliti (2003:18). Kitzinger (2005) a well-established academic
within the research world suggests focus groups provide the tools to examine individuals “experiences, points of
view and concerns (Liamputtong 2011). Zeithaml (1988) study of ‘Consumer Perceptions’ provides a strong
argument for the use of focus groups as a method to identify perceptions.
Various academic moderators have suggested optimum focus group sizes from 5-6 (Green & Hart, 1999), 6-8
(Krueger, 1998), 6-12 (Lindoff, 2002) and Brown (1999) suggesting homogeneity is a factor effecting focus
group size. The aim was to achieve twelve participants; however eight was achieved due to contributors
removing themselves from the research See Table 1).
A moderated approach was adopted within the focus group, the main purpose of the moderator being to keep
discussions on track and provide lively discussions (American Statistical Association, 1998), and the researcher
acting as the moderator in this study.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
128
Focus Group One Focus Group Two
Participant Number 9 11
Age Range 25-34 35-45
Location Cornwall Council Offices Wadebridge School
Duration 55Minutes 61 Minutes
Recorded ✓ ✓
Moderated ✓ ✓
Table 1: Focus Group Structure
Qualitative Research – Interviews
Further to focus groups, semi - structured interviews were used to access different aspects of peoples opinion
(Michell, 1999), interviews also provide the participants with freedom to express their viewpoint, as well as
providing the interviewer with comparable qualitative data (Bernard, 1988). Moreover, participants were asked
a set of pre-constructed questions to provoke more common themes, allowing for basic quantifiable of data
(Bryman and Bell, 2011).
Boyce and Neale (2006:248) suggest that in an interview guide there should be no more than 15 main questions
to guide the interview. Probing and prompting skills helping the researcher to clarify what participants say and
get more details on specific issues thus eliciting the richest data (Lofland, 1971) and reduce the chance of
participants moving off the designated research topic (Morgan, 1988).
Hoepfl (1997) and Patton (1990) identify 3 interview formats 1) informal interviews 2) semi-structured
interviews 3) structured formal interviews. A semi-structured format was used opposed to a structured
interview, due to its increased flexibility, allowing the researcher to gain more elaborate information (Gill,
2009). Semi-structured interviews also allowed the research objective to be met, with perceptions generally
much deeper than data collection in a quantitative based approach.
Interviews took place based on the individual requirements, with the time and location of interview being most
suitable for each participant (Gill, 2008). A digital recorder was used to ensure no information was missed and
later used for transcription. Interview length ranged dependent on the responsiveness of each individual, no
strict time scale was ensuring full depth of response (See Table 2).
25-34 Age Range 35-45 Age Range
Interview Numbers 6 5
Location Home, Work & Social Settings Home, Work & Social Settings
Duration 35-55 Minutes 45-57 Minutes
Recorded ✓ ✓
Transcribed ✓ ✓
Table 2: Interview Structure
Selecting Participants
Participants for interviews were selected using purposive sampling, selecting participants on the basis of the
requirements for the research project (Miles & Huberman, 1984). Participants where random in most aspects
apart from age, familiarity amongst individuals was minimised to reduce the influence from acquaintances
(Barnett, 2002). Due to early struggles in coordinating individuals from various locations to participate in a
focus group, a snow balling approach was used to focus group sampling. In Snowball sampling participants are
recruited and then asked to help with the recruit individuals who would be interested in participating (Ellis,
1993), selecting key advocators of the study to convince any potential doubters to partake.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
129
Ethical Considerations
Streubert and Carpenter (1993:33), highlight a set of three main ethical considerations that must be considered
when following a qualitative approach. The first consideration is autonomy, which is the right for participants to
voluntary participate or remove themselves from the study (Mathison, 1998). Participants in this study where
informed, involvement in the study was completely voluntary and omission from the study could be taken at any
point during the interview/focus group. Secondly, Struebert and Carpenter (1999) highlight the importance of
continued information with participants due to the changing nature of qualitative research. Prior to focus groups
and interviews commenced a full briefing and signed consent was obtained from participants, informing them of
the objectives and how involvement contributed to the study. Additionally, the aims and objectives of the study
were presented verbally to the individuals and further clarifications were made when necessary. Struebert and
Carpenter (1999) note principles of beneficence and justice as two final considerations, arguing complete
anonymity is impossible within qualitative research. Confidentiality was insured through the following
procedures 1) No personal information was obtained from participants; details omitted from the transcription
process and referred to as ‘Interviewee 1’ etc. 2) Interview recordings were only used for the purpose of
transcription and this data was treated accordingly in line with Plymouth University procedures. 3) After
transcription and analysis recordings where then deleted. Moreover, a full debriefing followed interviews and
focus groups, where questions or queries could be answered.
Analysis Method
Transcription is the process of translating of sound/image into a text format (Duranti, 2007). Transcription in its
nature is has to be selective due to the impossibility of recording all features of talk and interactions from
recordings (Davidson, 2009). Och’s (1979) proposes, “A more useful transcript is a selective one” (Pg. 44).
Both interviews and focused groups were transcribed and analysis of each transcribe took a grounded theory
coding approach. The process of coding involves identifying themes through “reading and re-reading of the
data” (Rice & Ezzy, 1999, p. 258 and Federay Et Al, 2006). Coding as a mechanism is used to reduce the
quantity of data (Huberman and Miles, 1994) and understand the meaning of the data (Bryman and Bell, 2007).
However, codes can do much more than just fragment and retrieve elements of research text (Strauss and Corbin
1990; Coffey and Atkinson, 1996). Data was first transcribed into a word format from recordings and then
processed using Nvivo software. Bryman and Bell (2007) identify Coffey and Atkinson (1996) three levels of
coding namely basic, awareness and analytical codes; Crabtree and Miller (1999) recommend ‘template’
approach to coding (Federay Et Al, 2006) and Boyatzis (1998) this process involves identifying important
moments and coding it prior to interpretation. This research used a mixture of Crabtree and Miller (1999),
Coffey and Atkinson (1996) and Boyatzis, (1998), using created a coding structure. The template of codes
allowed for a clearer analysis of the identified code (Fereday et al, 2006). To gain greater recognition from
positivist supporters coding undertook basic quantification, as with the work of Hardy (2001) and Bryman and
Bell (2011) simplistic code counting will be applied to the observed codes, using frequency occurred in
population as the main statistical identifier.
Findings & Discussion
The purpose of this chapter is to analyse the key findings in each section, then present a discussion that relates
the findings of this research to literature.
How Is Direct Marketing Defined & Used?
We can first gain an understanding of the perceptions of Direct Mail, by analysing how Direct Mail is defined.
Understanding how people define direct marketing gives an early indication of consumer perceptions.
I5: “direct marketing is the process of providing targeted information to me, through the Mail and Email”
FC2: “Direct Marketing is directed advertising technique to encourage purchase“.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
130
In their definitions of direct marketing (I5 & FC2), participants commonly referred to the concepts of 'targeting'
and 'purchase”, in addition to the high frequency of respondents highlighting the key themes of “purchase” and
“targeted” provides two main suggestions. Firstly, the identification of “Purchase” as a main theme across
definitions provides an indication that consumers view direct mail as a medium that does affect purchase.
Secondly, “Targeted” as Lariscy et al (1996) note is a key advantage of direct mail, suggesting that the Internet
has not impacted the benefits of direct mail.
What Attracts You To Marketing?
As well as understanding the factors that influence the decision to purchase, further value is placed on
understanding the features that attract individuals to a marketing medium. The surprising result of this
discussion is the importance of preconceptions in a consumer’s uptake of a certain advertising medium.
Amongst respondents both the preconceptions of brand and the opinion of marketing tools highlighted occurred
most often.
FG1: “brand image has the biggest effect for me… if I receive marketing t from Apple, I immediately
favour that marketing”
FG2: “How marketing is administer is important, Junk Emails and Spam Flyers do not attract me”
From the above (FG1 & FG2) and further responses it can be noted that “Preconceptions” of brand and
marketing tools play a role in the overall attraction to marketing. As Kotler (2010) identifies a positive view of
the marketing mix will increase the overall intent to purchase, this research would suggest that if favourable
perceptions of direct mail exist, the sale of the promoted product increase. In light of the discovery of the
importance of preconceptions in the purchase decision, the following chapters will seek to uncover perceptions
of Direct Mail are favourable.
Perceived Advantages of Direct Mail
Trust
One of key findings of this study is the identification of the “Trust” element in the purchase decision and how
direct mail contributes to this, being a new benefit previously not identified by academia. A main objective of
this research was to identify “How direct marketing can influence the decision to purchase in the 21st century”
the proceeding discussion provides depth of evidence towards this. To identify the influence of the purchase
decision, perceived benefits would first need to be identified, Chen et al (1998) highlights the impact of positive
perceptions on increased adoption of advertising mediums. Within the sample “Trust” was identified the second
highest perceived benefits of direct mail, identifying an average frequency of 50% amongst all participants, 40%
amongst 25-34 year olds and 59% in 35-45 age category (See Table 3).
Age
Group
Advantage Frequency Age Group Advantage Frequency
25-34
Convenience 62%
35-45
Trust 59%
Trust 40% Convenience 48%
Personal 25% Reminder 30%
Reminder >5% Personal 30%
Information Rich >5% Information Rich 25%
Table 3 – “Comparison of Perceived Advantages Of Direct Mail”
Furthermore, the importance of trust is not limited to interviewees in 35-45 age ranges as highlighted above.
Interviewee numbers four in the 25-35-age range highlighting a lack of confidence online.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
131
I4: “Products mis-advertised through fraudulent websites fail to live up to expectations, therefore a brand I can
trust improves the repeat purchase of that brand”
The use of “Fraudulent” and “Mis-Advertised” indicates a possible negative prior experience with the Internet
as a purchase platform. This trend is uncovered further when a variety of sub-questions where used in order to
provoke depth in response, “Do you trust direct mail?” and if so “Why Do You Trust Direct Mail?” where used
to uncover greater depth. Of the responses, again Interviewee three and eight provided the most valuable
responses.
I3:“The Internet is becoming in-secure, which increasingly encourages me to purchase through more offline
other formats”
I8:“Content on paper is physical and costly to distribute, being less likely to be dishonest. Online people create
scams and defraud with greater ease”
Across both respondents a clear worry of “insecurity”, “fraud” and “scamming” is evident across both sample
sets. Signifying a lack of unity towards agreeing with the work of Pinheoro (2014) who highlights “Security” as
a key benefit of online purchasing. However, in the respondents who did not highlight “Trust as a perceived
advantage (I2, I5, I7, I10), the sub-question “Do you not trust Direct Mail? Was generated to know the reasons
why. The most valuable response was from Interviewee 10:
I10: “I trust Direct Mail, but I do not receive enough of it to value it as an advertising format anymore”
This implies that even for individuals who did not directly identify “Trust” as a perceived benefit, the attribute is
still a part of their overall perceptions of Direct Mail. Moreover, this early indicator provides strong evidence in
answering the main objective of this research “Can direct mail marketing still influence the buyers purchasing
decision in the 21st century?” providing early signals that direct mail is perceived in a favourable manner by
both age groups. Amongst focus group participation, 35-45’s coincided with that of interviewees also citing
“Trust” in their perceptions of Direct Mail.
FG2: “Direct Mail is trustworthy in the way it is distributed and my previous experiences of it. I haven’t
purchased a product or be mislead through direct mail campaigns”
The responses above showing clear correlation to responses found in prior interviews, further impacting the
overall importance of trust in this age group. Conversely, participants in Focus Group 1 (25-35) did not
highlight “Trust” to a great extent, occurring only 5 times through the duration of the Focus Group. Therefore
the depth of trend has smaller implications for the suggested age range.
Convenience
With increased online usage there has been greater suggestion that online services will replace the need for
offline (Dutta-Bergman, 2004). This suggestion strongly backed due to the high number of benefits online offers
including; Interactivity (Kiang, 2000 & Peterson et al 1997), Convenience (Bayo-Moriones, 2007),
Customization and flexibility (Long, 1997). As such, due to the high number of benefits and increased usage it
is clear why there are increasing numbers of advocates of Dutta-Bergman’s (2004) work. Findings from this
research would tend to disagree with the above suggestion and present new insight into consumer opinions. As
table 1 underlines
I4: “Being directly posted on me it saves the need to search for information, I do not have to search online or
visit the store”
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
132
FG2: “As it arrives on my doorstep, it reduces the need for me to search, improving the overall convenience”
Moreover this lack of agreement with previous literature is further strengthened by later responses by the
respondents cited above. When questioned directly “What are the benefits of online advertising?” a scarcity in
the “Convenience” code adds greater depth to the above-mentioned themes. Of the respondents who did not
highlight convenience as a benefit of online, 45% of 25-35 instead highlighted convenience as an offline benefit
and 35% in 35-45 age groups, with some respondents openly stating which side they take.
The implication of the above findings add greater clarity in answering the research object “Can direct mail
marketing still influence the buyers purchasing decision in the 21st century?” Within two scenarios, both sample
sets (25-35 & 35-45) advocating clear advantages over that of the online alternatives. That would critically
demonstrate a place for Direct Mail in the 21st century.
Reminding Effect
One additional highlight of this research is the recognition from the sample of the “Reminder” effect that direct
mail offers. Although not recognised in a high frequency <5% amongst 25-34 year olds, the high presence the
reminder theme amongst 35-45 year olds is of greater interest.
FG2: “As direct mail is a physical advertising format as opposed to on screen it is continuously reminding me
of that product/service. As I keep picking that up piece of mail up and re reading it”
FG2: “When I receive mail or advertisement, it is placed in the family basket of mail, as such other family
members have the opportunity to view it at there convenience, moreover it allows me to re- read the information
at a later date”
The interesting points to draw from the responses above, firstly is the idea that advertisement is viewed more
than once, the concept of “Re-reading” is evident in both the above, a concept originally coined by Bergemann
(2010). Response No.2 gives greater value to overall research project, as it presents an effect previously not
identified. The idea that “Others have the opportunity to view”, is a suggestion previously un-identified in
literature, but is an extremely strong potential benefit to marketers. Due to the increased reach a singular
marketing campaign can have, improving the availability of information and overall the likelihood of purchase
(Howard & Sheth, 1969).
What Effects The Decision To Purchase?
By understanding what effects purchase, it will clearly identify the factors in which marketing can contribute
towards. As such, it will assist in answering the question if Direct Mail can exist despite the rise of the Internet.
Responses to the questions “What attracts you to marketing?” and “What puts you off from marketing?” where
mixed and highly varied. Individuals aged 25-34 provoked responses focus around the central idea of content,
the themes of “Colour”, “Images”, “Convenience”, “Information” and “Trust” occurring at the highest
frequency. In comparison 35-45 concentrated on the process itself suggesting ‘Honesty’, ‘Convenience’,
‘Information’, ‘Trust’ and ‘Opinions’ as the main marketing influences contributing to the purchase decision.
The two main points to draw from this is the following 1) importance of trust increases with age and 2) The
greater an acceptance of advertisement, the increased level of purchase. Implications to management are the
advantages direct mail can offer at a time when trust in online advertisement is tarnished. With it generally
accepted that Internet usage is rising at consumer and organisational level, this study however would indicate a
lack of confidence in online, and consequently causing organisations to revaluate the distribution of online and
offline spend, in order to create a trustworthy brand.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
133
How Can Direct Mail Effect the Purchase Decision
Improve Trust
It has been highlighted that the way in which marketing perceived is directly linked to the uptake of that product
(Kotler, 2010). Trust, convenience and reminder were increasing factors effecting purchase across both age
groups, with an average frequency of above 20% across the sample (Table 4). This reveals “Trust”,
“Convenience” and “Reminding Effect” as the largest influencers in the decision to purchase.
Age
Group
Stimuli Frequency Age Group Stimuli Frequency
25-34
Convenience 77%
35-45
Trust 56%
Trust 42% Convenience 48%
Price 25% Past Experience 30%
Information >5% Information 30%
Past Experience >5% Personalisation 25%
Table 4 - Stimuli Affecting Purchase
The above findings would highlight the impact of trust is far more important than previously considered in the
works of Howard & Sheth (1969) and Engel-Blackwell-Miniard (1990) who did not directly feature trust as a
stimuli. As Interviewee 3, 7 and focus group 1 suggests, the level of trust they placed in a brand directly
correlates to the volume and frequency of purchase.
I3: “Trusting a brand increases the amount I purchase from that company, as I know exactly what I am going to
receive”
I7: “The assurance I have of a products quality, honesty and reliability the increased likelihood I will purchase
from the organisation again”
FG1: “I have to be confident in the method of purchase before I commit to that process”
This theme has the potential to impact purchase situations that demand high levels of trust and honesty. As
respondents clearly indicate inkling towards situations that require trust and honesty. To contribute further depth
of understanding, the question “In what situations can Direct Mail work best in?” was put forward in later
discussions to uncover in what situations consumers viewed direct mail would have its greatest effect,
provoking the following responses:
FC2: “Direct Mail exhibits trust, therefore I would see Direct Mail in situations where trust is essential –
Banking, Health Care and Insurance”
FC2: “When purchasing a car, stereo or television I have always found that Direct Mail is suited best to these
situations”
Responses would suggest that direct mail has a strong case for applications in the above-mentioned sectors.
Moreover, the views of I8 and I3 (Pg. 18), who highlight the disadvantages of Online/The Internet as “Insecure”
and “Full of scams”, strengthens the case for Direct Mail as a future advertising, but also purchase medium.
However, a much deeper analysis in the purchase environment would be needed to prove/disprove the identified
themes.
Offer Convenience
Convenience occurred at an average frequency of 62.5% across both age groups, which would suggest
individuals have limited spare time. As such if time constraints exist within an individuals lifestyle, it has the
potential to lower the effectiveness of television and radio as advertising formats, due to increased usage needed
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
134
to gain exposure to these formats (Wilby, 2001). The way in which age differs the way in which they consider
convenience across age was of particular interest in this study.
I1: “The convenience of being able to purchase on the move through the Internet has become of increasing
importance when looking to buy a product” & FC1: “time is always limited, any factor improving the overall
speed and convenience of purchase is seen favourable, E.g. Mobile & Contactless”
I9: “Having somewhere local view, feel and purchase the product” & FC2: “The comfort of viewing catalogues
at home, on the train or during my break gives me more time to justify purchase”
The above responses specify a clear dissimilarity between conveniences across age, what is important to note is
the citing of online and offline between age groups. I1 and FC1 point out primarily online methods of
advertising an purchase, citing “Mobile”, “The Internet’ and “Contactless” in comparison to I9 and FC2 who
cite offline methods “Catalogues” and “Local Stores”. This provides a sign that as age increases the preference
for offline formats of advertising and sales are favoured. However Interviewee 2 and Interviewee 7 contradicted
this above trend.
I2: “Any offering that can be directly placed in my hand, improves the overall convenience of purchase and will
benefit me” And I7: “A process that lowers the time I have to spend searching and offers me the best price”
FC2: “Direct mail is a physical advertising format in comparison to on screen, it continuously reminds me of
that product/service, as I keep re reading it”
Each contradicting the previous suggestions by I1, I9, FC1 and FC2, creating a basis for further study as the
perceptions and preferences amongst age are inconclusive and require greater examination. In addition to the
main discovery of “Trust” and “Convenience” as the main influences effecting purchase, reminding effect also
has a direct influence on the intent to buy.
Increase Consumer Knowledge
In literature two main sets of academics have sought to discover the process of the decision to purchase, as well
as a variety of factors influencing this decision. Howard & Sheth (1969) providing “Stimuli” as a classification
for the various pieces information influences. As FC2 implies a huge benefit to consumers is the concept that
you can pick up and re read the content, furthermore the focus on “Physicality” in the definition is an area that
could be of interest in further research. As the models of buyer behaviour imply consumers evaluate a
information at a variety of levels (See Figure 1), the results of this study therefore suggest that consumers will
evaluate the information more than once, consequently a greater exposure to information can greatly improve
the decision to purchase, due to it improving the knowledge consumer has of that product (Engel-Blackwell-
Miniard, 1990). However, it must be noted that frequency of the “Reminding” code was limited, an overall
indictor of its strength in prompting purchase.
Trust, convenience and reminding are the main “Stimuli” affecting the overall intention to purchase and Direct
Mail exhibits these as the main benefits from a consumer perspective (Table 1), it offers strong evidence to
answering the research objective “Can direct mail marketing still influence the buyers purchasing decision in the
21st century” in that it contributes the qualities consumers look for.
Direct Mail In The Future
This research has clearly identified that Direct Mail will still have an effect in years to come, supporting the
work of Dannaher (2011). When directly asked “Do you see a place in the future for Direct Mail?” response
amongst both groups was positive (Table 5). Providing a new direction to the research area since the work of
Leeflang et al (2013) who advocate limited Direct Mail in the future. With the overall objective of
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
135
understanding perceptions, this investigation went further by providing some suggestion to the situations in
which Direct Mail would have its biggest effect.
Age Yes No
25-34 76% 24%
35-45 80% 20%
Table 5 – Will Direct Mail exist in the future – Age Comparison
The implications to managers is that is provides suggestion to the situations in which a Direct Mail approach
would be best suited namely, high information and personal products. With Internet and Mobile Banking
continually increasing (McKinsey, 2013) and online spend increasing five fold in 2014 (Daneshkhu, 2014),
indicates a strong movement online. This study counters this view, indicating that Direct Mail should not be
ignored as a future advertising medium. Furthermore, the strong perceived benefits of Direct Mail in
comparison to the lack of online benefits, provides a compelling argument for Direct Mail as a future medium.
As discussed above, one final point that provides a strong argument for the continued preference of Direct Mail
is evidenced by the results in this study.
Age Online Offline
25-34 45% 55%
35-45 40% 60%
Table 6 – Advertising Preference – Age Comparison
When individuals were given a the choice between social media and direct mail after lengthy discussions of
both, age groups showed a preference for direct mail, with the code “Offline“ being used, with frequency’s
greater than 50% (See Table 6). However, these suggestions must be taken in light of the limitations of the
research, namely sample size and research validity.
Discussion
In addition to the highlighted it is important to note this study’s perceptions in relation to previous academia
(Table 3). Berry (2001) is one of the main researchers on this area, highlights personal, selective, flexible and
discreet as the main perceived benefits of direct mail. This study has clearly identified personal as a main
benefit of direct mail, with a high frequency amongst respondents (See Figure 3.0). Moreover, the importance
of it in the purchase decision strengthens its applications in the 21st century. However, it can be argued that
much of what Berry (2001) highlights as advantageous is from an organizational perspective; therefore it
provides some explanation to the lack of agreement with Berry’s work. Earlier research by Lariscy et al (1996)
highlighted greater targeting and more competitive offerings, this study would provide support for the perceived
benefit of “Targeted” due to its high occurrence in early definitions. The absence of “More competitive
offerings” can be partially explained by the scenarios in which research was conducted. Lariscy et al (1996)
analyzing consumer’s actual purchase in much greater depth.
The areas in which this research agrees most directly to literature, is with the work of Korgaonkar (1984) and
Santana (2013). “Convenience” as highlighted by Korgaonkar (1984) was one of the highest identified benefits
of this study (See Table 1), furthermore as a strong attribute affecting purchase, it indicates that direct mail can
still have a huge effect in the purchase decision, supporting the work of Gillette (1970) and Berkowitz et al
(1979). Furthermore the scarcity of “Convenience” as a perceived benefit of online advertisement reinforces the
suggestion of direct mail as a future advertising medium. Of more recent studies, Santana (2013) pinpoints
“Reminding effect” as the main advantage of direct mail. Findings from this research strongly back his work. As
with convenience, the reminding effect was a main theme of this research. More importantly, the strong
presence of “Information” as a stimuli-effecting purchase bolsters the argument for future direct mail
advertisement.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
136
Furthermore, the observed importance of “Trust” as a perceived benefit has a great impact on the overall
decision to purchase. As Cheng et al (1998) and Shukla (2012) note, perceived benefits correlate to the overall
decision to purchase. As with convenience, direct mail is viewed as trustworthy and is a stimulus that the
consumer looks for, its applications as marketing tool in the 21st are strengthened to a greater extent. Finally,
the importance of the “Reminding effect” agrees with the prior work of Bergemann (2010), but adds greater
depth to his work by proposing a new knock on affect previously not highlighted. In relation to the low number
of unique benefits online can offer, it would indicate the long-term success of Direct Mail.
Effect of Age
Of the various studies that have been conducted over the past thirty years, there has been little consensus on the
effect of age on both the intent to purchase and its impact on perceptions. From the literature conducted this
research would counter the findings of Darian (1987) who states as age increases the preference for direct mail
decreases. Direct mail instead being viewed as favorable and having a place in the future (See figure 122).
Advocating the previous findings of Gillet (1976) and Settle et al (1994) who find little difference between age
and the adoption of a certain advertising format, instead suggesting both ages favor direct mail. The importance
of this is in relation findings in relation to the Eurostat (2010) statistics which highlight increased Internet usage
amongst younger individuals, suggesting a preference for online formats (Dutta-Bergmann, 2004). As such,
with such an indication, it provides a strong argument for management to reconsider the appropriate methods to
target younger consumers.
Conclusions / Recommendations
Since the work of early work of Gillette (1970), Reynolds (1974) and Darian (1987) various academics have
looked to discover the perceived benefits of offline advertisement, but few have examined offline effectiveness
in a marketplace flooded with online marketing tools (Social media, emails and Google ads). Moreover, with a
greater focus amongst current literature for online, the central objective of this research was to identify the
current and future influence of direct mail in the purchase decision; it has been successful in achieving this,
supporting the use of direct mail as a future advertising medium.
Findings have shown across a range of variables that Direct mail is still a highly influential method of
advertising. Most notably, the identification of convenience, trust and the reminding effect are further
strengthened by their correlation with the stimuli that effect purchase (Information, trust, convenience and
price). Additionally, the clearly consensus amongst respondents for direct mail existing in the future, but also
the situations in which direct mail will have its greatest influence (Banking and High trust situations).
Furthermore, based on the identification of benefits of direct mail this study can conclude that the Internet has
no detrimental impact on the perceptions of direct mail, but instead created further advantages (Personalised). In
regards to age, this study has offered suggestion that age has a limited impact on the perceived advantages of
direct mail, supporting the general trend found amongst previous studies (Gillette, 1976).
The significance of this study is that it clearly contributes to a new direction in future studies, opposing the trend
that online will replace offline (Dutta-Bergmann, 2004). With numerous perceived benefits that match
consumers wants, our findings would strongly suggest a reconsideration of spend, with a greater focus on direct
marketing to reach a range of age groups. Moreover, the strong perceived benefits despite increased Internet
usage, cements its place as a contributing factor in the purchase decision for years to come.
Recommendations for Further Study
Although this research has been successful in identifying a range of important implications for managers, it has
two limitations that can be addressed in future research. Depth of perceptions and attitudes have been the focus
of this study, but lacks the depth in sample size, future research should focus on gaining further depth of
understanding amongst the population, a wider use of qualitative methods would establish greater knowledge of
the wider perceptions of UK consumers, as location is an unexamined factor in the purchase decision. Age is
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
137
another variable that hasn’t been fully examined, only comparing the attitudes of two age sets, other groups (18-
25 & 65+) also have an importance for marketers, due to the perceived high and low Internet usage.
Additionally, this study does not test if what people claim, follows through to actual purchase, therefore a gap
exists in research to test purchase patterns based on their perceptions of direct mail, requiring substantial
investment to establish enough data to gain validity.
Delimitations of Research & Limitations
The research has not focus on the following Direct Marketing techniques 1) Television Advertisement, 2)
Radio, primarily to narrow the focus of the research to allow for a more in-depth review of Direct Mail as an
advertising medium. Moreover, Dutta-Bergmann (2004) amongst other academics cites direct mail one as the
advertising most at threat. Additionally, Radio and Television cannot directly be replaced by Internet
alternatives; as such these marketing mediums will be excluded in this research. As Radio and Television will
still have a presence, even in the wake of increased Internet usage.
Limitations of Research
This research has several limitations, as a qualitative based study, this research aimed to gain depth to
understanding as opposed to generalizability. Sample size was therefore small in comparison to a quantitative
based study, which positivists would argue limits its validity and credibility. Sample size remained small
because of time constraints imposed by other assessments during the same period. If time constraints didn’t
exist then research would take a more triangulated approach, Mathison (1988) suggests triangulation improves
the validity of research. Additionally only accounting for two age ranges, a wider analysis of age must be
assessed to fully understand the population, a wider analysis of age would have contributed to more to marketers
and organisations. Finally, throughout this study there has been a strong indication from the sample that Direct
Marketing is still a favourable marketing method, but at no point has this been tested within a purchasing
scenario. As such proposals have been made of how these limitations can be incorporated into future studies.
References Abraham, M (2008), “The Off-Line Impact of Online Ads,” Harvard Business Review, 86 (4), 28.
Adler, Richard P, (1977), "TV Effects on Consumer Skills and Interpersonal Processes," Washington, DC: U.S. Govemmctit
Printing Office
Akaah, I., Korgaonkar, P. and Lund, D. (1995). Direct marketing attitudes. Journal of Business Research, 34(3), pp.211-219.
Allen, M. (1997). Medicine Goes Madison Avenue: An Evaluation of the Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Pharmaceutical
Advertising on the Learned Intermediary Doctrine. Campbell Law Review. 20 (3), 113-130.
Althaus, S. and Tewksbury, D. (2000). Patterns of Internet and Traditional News Media Use in a Networked
Community. Political Communication, 17(1), pp.21-45.
Andreasen, A. (1965). Attitude and Customer Behaviour: A Decision Model. In L.Preston (Eds.) New Research Marketing,
Berkeley, California: Institute of Business and Economic Research.
Atkin, C. (1976). Mass media and the aging. In H. P. Oyer & E. ). Oyer (Eds.), Aging and communication (pp. 99-118).
Baltimore: University Park Press..
Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company
Babbie, E. (2001). The Practice of Social Research: 9th Edition. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson.
Bachmann, I. and de Zuniga, H. (2010). News Platform Preference as a predictor of political and civic
participation. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19(4), pp.496-512.
Barnett, N. (2002). Some inequalities for probability, expectation, and variance of random variables defined over a finite
interval. Computers & Mathematics with Applications. 43 (10), 1319–1357.
Barnes, N. and Peters, M. (1982), “Modes of retail distribution: the use of the elderly”, Akron Business and Economic
Review, Vol. 3, pp. 26‐31.
Bassey, M. (1995) Creating Education through Research: A Global Perspective of Educational Research in the 21st Century.
BERA England: Moor Press
Batra, S. (2009). Consumer behaviour. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Excel Books.
Bayo-Moriones, A., & Lera-Lopez, F. (2007). A firm-level analysis of
determinants of ICT adoption in Spain. Technovation, 27(6/7),
352—366.
Belk, R. W., Devinney, T., & Eckhardt, G. (2005). Consumer Ethics Across Cultures. Consumption, Markets and Culture,
8(3), 275-289.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
138
Berger, P. L., and Luckman, T. (1967). The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in Sociology of Knowledge, New
York: Irvington Publishers.
Bergemann, Dirk & Bonatti, Alessandro, (2010) "Targeting in Advertising Markets: Implications for Offline vs. Online
Media,"CEPR Discussion Papers 7988, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
Berkowitz, E., Walton, J. and Walker, O. (1979). In Home Shoppers: The Market Of Innovative Distribution
Systems. Journal Of Retailing, 55(Summer), pp.15-33.
Berry, M. (2001). Mining the Web. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Bogdan, R. and Taylor, S. (1975) Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods, New York: John Wiley.
Bogdan, R.C., & Biklin S.K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. (3rd ed.)
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bogardus, E (1925) Social distance and its origins. Journal of Applied Sociology. Vol 9. 216-225
Booms, B., and Bitner, M. (1981) “Marketing Strategies andOrganisation Structures for Service Firms”, American
Marketing Association, Chicago, 46-51.
Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
BOYCE, C. & NEALE, P. (2006), Conducting In-Depth Interviews: A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth
Interviews for Evaluation Input. Pathfinder International Tool Series Monitoring and Evaluation.
Burns, R (1997). Introduction to Research Methods. 3rd ed. Pennsylvania State University: Addison Wesley Longman.
Bray, J. (2008). Consumer Behaviour Theory: Approaches and Models. [online] Available at:
http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/10107/1/Consumer_Behaviour_Theory_-_Approaches_%26_Models.pdf [Accessed 1
Apr. 2015].
Brewer, J and Hunter, A (1989) Multimethod research: a synthesis of styles, Newbury Park: Sage, Sage Library of Social
Research Series, Vol. 175
Briggs, R, Krishnan, R and Borin, N (2005), “Integrated Multichannel Communication Strategies: Evaluating the Return on
Marketing Objectives—The Case of the 2004 FORD F-150 Launch,” Journal of Interactive Marketing, 19 (3), 81–90.
Brooker, R. (2013). Why is qualitative research sometimes given preference over quantitative research? Outline and discuss
the main principles of qualitative research in your answer.. [online] Available at:
http://www.essex.ac.uk/sociology/documents/research/publications/ug_journal/vol12/2014SC101_Robin%20Brooker_3f
inal.pdf [Accessed 7 Apr. 2015].
Brown, J. B. (1999). The use of focus groups in clinical research. In B. F. Crabtree, & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative
research (2nd ed., pp. 109-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bryman, A, Bell, E, (2007) Business Research Methods, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.
Bryman, A. (2011). Business research methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bryman, A (2012) Social Research Methods 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Calder, B. J. (1977). "Focus Groups and the nature of qualitative market Research." Journal of Marketing Research 14(14):
353-364.
Cameron, R. (2011) “Mixed Methods Research: The Five Ps Framework” The Electronic Journal of Business Research
Methods Vol 9 (2), pp 96-108).
Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C., and Gronhaug, K. (2001). Qualitative Marketing Research. London: Sage.
Chang, Y Et. al (2004), “Television and Web Advertising Synergies,” Journal of Advertising, 33 (2), 75–81.
Chen, S., Monroe, K. and Lou, Y. (1998). The effects of framing price promotion messages on consumers' perceptions and
purchase intentions. Journal of Retailing, 74(3), pp.353-372.
Chung, E & Alagaratnam, S (2001),"“Teach ten thousand stars how not to dance”: a survey of alternative ontologies in
marketing research", Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, Vol. 4 Iss 4 pp. 224 – 234
Coffey, A., Holbrook, B. and Atkinson, P. (1996). Qualitative Data Analysis: Technologies and
Representations. Sociological Research Online, 1(1).
Cohen, D & Crabtree, B (2006) "Qualitative Research Guidelines Project." Available at: http://www.qualres.org/HomeSemi-
3629.html
Cohen, L. Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education 6th edition. London: Routledge.
Cunningham, M. (1973). The determinants of choice of supplier: a study of purchase behaviour for capital goods . European
Journal of Marketing. 7 (3), 189-202.
Crabtree, B & Miller, W (1999). Doing Qualitative Research. Michigan: SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J (2003). RESEARCH DESIGN Qualitative, Quantitative. and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd ed. California:
Sage Publications, Inc.. 3-26.
Creswell, J.W. and Plano Clark, V.L. (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks,
California.
Creswell, J. W. (2009) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3rd edition, London:
Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2013) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th edition, London:
Sage.
Crotty, M. (1989). The foundations of social research. London: Sage.
Crotty, M (1998). The Foundations of Social Research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. 1.
Crotty, M. (1998). The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process. Australia: Allen
and Unwin.
Danaher, P & Rossiter, J (2011),"Comparing perceptions of marketing communication channels", European Journal of
Marketing, Vol. 45 Iss 1/2 pp. 6 - 42
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
139
Daneshkhu, S. (2014). UK consumers spend five-times more online - FT.com. [online] Financial Times. Available at:
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9cddc9e6-f491-11e3-bf6e-00144feabdc0.html [Accessed 14 Apr. 2015].
Darian, J. (1987). 'In-Home Shopping: Are There Consumer Segments. Journal Of Retailing, 63(2), pp.163-167.
Davidson, C. (2009). Transcription:Imperatives for Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 8 (2),
36-48.
Davis, J., Hands, D. and Maki, U. (1998). The handbook of economic methodology. Cheltenham, UK: E. Elgar.
Denzin, N and Lincoln, Y (1994) ‘Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln
(eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp.1-17), London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Denzin, N and Lincoln, Y (2000), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 163-188). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dewey, J (1925). Experience and Nature. Open Court, Chicago, (Revised):London: George.
Dey, I. (1993) Qualitative Data Analysis:A User-friendly Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Routledge.
DMA. (2012). DMA Annual report 2012. Available: http://dma.org.uk/uploads/Annual-report-2012_53d8e44dcedc9.pdf .
Last accessed 10th Apr 2015.
Du Plessis, P. (1991). Consumer Behaviour. A South African Perspective. Johannesburg: Southern Book Publishers.
Duranti, A. (2007). Transcripts, like shadows on a wall. Mind, Culture and Activity, 13(4), 301– 310.
Dutta-Bergman, M. (2004). Complementarity in Consumption of News Types Across Traditional and New Media. Journal
of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(1), pp.41-60.
Easterby-Smith, M., Thorpe, R., & Jackson, P. (2012). Management research. Sage.
Edgecliffe-Johnson, A., Grande, C. and Harney, A. (2012) 'Online Shoppers Choose Price over Convenience', Financial
Times, Feb 20, London
Edwards, N. Handcock, S. Mullen, J (1998), Electronic commerce: reality bytes, Supply Management Vol. 3 32–34.
Ellis, K. (1993). Teacher questioning behavior and student learning: What research says to teachers. (Paper presented at the
1993 Convention of the Western States Communication Association, Albuquerque, New Mexico).
Erasmus, A., Boshoff, E. and Rousseau, G. (2001). Consumer decision-making models within the discipline of consumer
science: a critical approach. Journal of Family Ecology and Consumer Sciences, 29, pp.82-90.
Farzanfar, R. (2005). Using Qualitative Research Methods to Evaluate Automated Health Promotion/Disease Prevention
Technologies: A Procedures’ Manual. Boston University. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Feld, S., Frenzen, H., Krafft, M., Peters, K. and Verhoef, P. (2013). The effects of mailing design characteristics on direct
mail campaign performance. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(2), pp.143-159.
Feilzer, M. Y. (2010). Doing mixed methods research pragmatically: Implications for the rediscovery of pragmatism as a
research paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 4. 6 – 16.
Fereday, J. and Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive
and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), pp.80-91.
Gelb, B. and Zinkhan, G. (1986). Humor and Advertising Effectiveness after Repeated Exposures to a Radio
Commercial. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), pp.15-34.
Gerring, J. (2007). Case study research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gillette, P. (1970). A Profile Of Urban In Home Shoppers. Journal Of Marketing, 34(July), pp.40-45.
Gillette, P. (1976). In-Home Shoppers - An Overview. Journal Of Marketing, 40(Oct), pp.81-88.
Gill, P., Stewart, K., Treasure, E. and Chadwick, B. (2008). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews
and focus groups. Br Dent J, 204(6), pp.291-295.
Guba, E (1981) Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries, Educational Communication and
Technology Journal 29,pp 75–91.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth paradigm evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Guba, E. G. and Lincoln, Y. S. (1994) ‘Competing paradigms in qualitative research’, in N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln
(eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp.105-117), London: Sage.
Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluence. In N. K.
Gupta, S. (2013). Impact of Promotional Activities on Consumer Buying Behavior: A Study of Cosmetic
Industry. International Journal of Commerce, Business and Management, 2(6), pp.2319–2828.
Gray, D. (2014). Doing research in the real world. 3rd ed. London: Sage Publications.
Greco, A. and Fields, M. (2011). A Profile Of Elderly In Home Shoppers. The Journal Of Applied Business Research, 4(1),
pp.180-188.
Green, J., & Hart, L. (1999). The impact of context on data. In R. S. Barbour & J. Kitzinger (Eds.), Developing focus group
research (pp. 21–35).
Haines, G (1970) “Book Review: The Theory of Buyer Behaviour” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65,
(331) 1406-1407.
Hofstede, F.T., Steenkamp, J. and Wedel, M. (1999), “International market segmentation based on consumer-product
relations”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 36 No. 1, pp. 1-17.
Holt, K., Shehata, A., Stromback, J. and Ljungberg, E. (2013). Age and the effects of news media attention and social media
use on political interest and participation: Do social media function as leveller?. European Journal of Communication,
28(1), pp.19-34.
Holtzhausen, S (2001) ‘Triangulation as a powerful tool to strengthen the qualitative research design: The Resourse-based
Learning Career Preparation Programme (RBLCPP) as a case study’, Higher Education Close Up Conference 2, 16-18
July 2001, Lancaster University
Hoepfl, M. C. (1997). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of
Technology Education, 9(1), 47-63.
Horton, R. (1984). Buyer behavior. Columbus, Ohio: C.E. Merrill Pub. Co.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
140
Howard, J. (1989). Consumer behavior in marketing strategy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Howard, J. and Sheth, J. (1969). The Theory of Buyer behaviour. New York: John Wiley.
Howard, J. and Sheth, J. (1973). The Theory of Buyer behaviour. New York: Wiley.
Hudson, L., and Ozanne, J. (1988). Alternative Ways of Seeking Knowledge in Consumer Research.Journal of Consumer
Research, 14(4), 508–521.
Hunt, S. et al., (1972) “A Crucial Test for the Howard-Sheth Model of Buyer Behavior” Journal of Marketing Research, 9,
346-348.
Hunt, S. (1991). Positivism and Paradigm Dominance in Consumer Research: Toward Critical Pluralism and
Rapprochement. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), p.32.
John, G and Whitney, J. (1982). An Empirical Investigation of the Serial Structure of Scripts. American Marketing
Association. 6 (1), 75-79.
Jones, Pentecost, And Requena (2005). Memory for Advertising and Information Content: Comparing the Printed Page to
the Computer Screen Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 22(8): 623–648
Kanso A & Nelson, R (2004). Internet and magazine advertising: integrated partnerships or not?” J. Mark. Res., 44(4): 317-
326
Kaufman-Scarborough, C & Lindquist, J (2002),"E-shopping in a multiple channel environment", Journal of Consumer
Marketing, Vol. 19 Iss 4 pp. 333 – 350
Kiang, M, Raghu, T & Huei-Min Shang, K. (2000). Marketing on the Internet — who can benefit from an online marketing
approach?. Decision Support Systems. 27, 383-393.
Kijewski, V., Yoon, E. and Young, G. (1993), “How exhibitors select trade shows”, Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.
22, pp. 287-98
Kimmel, A. (2007). Ethical issues in behavioral research. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311(7000), pp.299-302.
Kitzinger, J (2005) FOCUS GROUP RESEARCH: using group dynamics to explore perceptions, experiences
and understandings.
Klein, L. and Ford, G. (2003). Consumer search for information in the digital age: An empirical study of prepurchase search
for automobiles. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17(3), pp.29-49.
Korgaonkar, P.K. (1984). Consumer shopping orientations, non-store retailers, and consumer's patronage intentions: A
multivariate investigation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 12(1), 11-22.
Kotler, P. (1967). Marketing management. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.S
Kotler, P. (1994). Marketing management. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (1998). Principles of marketing. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2002). Principles of marketing. 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Kotler, P. (2010). Principles of marketing. 13th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Krueger, Richard A. (1998). Moderating focus groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Krueger, Richard A. (1998). Analyzing and reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Lariscy, W & Tinkham, S (1996). Advertising message strategies in U.S. congressional campaigns: 1982, 1990. Journal of
Current Issues and Research in Advertising. Vol 18, 53-66.
Lee, H. (2005). An Application of a Five-Stage Consumer Behaviour Decision Making Model: An Exploratory Study of
Chinese Purchasing of Imported Health Food.
Leeflang, P, Spring, P , Van Doorn, J & Wansbeek, T (2013) Identifying the direct mail-prone consumer, Journal of Global
Scholars of Marketing Science: Bridging Asia and the World, 23:2, 175-195.
Liamputtong, P (2011). Focus Group Methodology. Australia: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Lincoln, Y. and Guba, E. (2000). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging influences.
Lindlof, T. R., & Taylor, B. C. 2002. ‘Qualitative communication research methods’. (2nd ed.) Thousands Oaks CA.: Sage
Publications.
Litosseliti, L (2003). Using Focus Groups in Research. London: A&C Black. 18.
Lofland, J. (1971), Analysing Social Settings: A Guide to Qualitative Observation and Analysis. Belmont: Wadsworth
Publishing.
Long, J (1997) E-COMMERCE: doing what’s best for business, Data Communications 26 (16) 77–80.
Loudon, D. and Bitta, A. (1993). Consumer Behavior. McGraw.
Lutz, R. (1985). Affective and Cognitive Antecedents Of Attitude towards the Ad: A conceptual framework. Psychological
Processes and Advertising Effects.
Lynch, R. (2003). Corporate strategy. 3rd ed. Harlow, England: FT/Prentice Hall.
Mack, L. (2010). The Philosophical Underpinnings of Educational Research. [online] Available at:
http://www.apu.ac.jp/rcaps/uploads/fckeditor/publications/polyglossia/Polyglossia_V19_Lindsay.pdf [Accessed 7 Apr.
2015].
Mackenzie, N. & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues In Educational
Research, 16(2), 193-205.
Mandl, M., Felfernig, A., Teppan, E. and Schubert, M. (n.d.). Consumer Decision Making in Knowledge-Based
Recommendation. [online] Available at: http://www.ist.tugraz.at/felfernig/PDF/AMT_Journal.pdf [Accessed 1 Apr.
2015].
Mathison, S. (1988). Why Triangulate?. Educational Researcher, 17(2), pp.13-17.
McCarthy, J (1964). Basic Marketing. A Managerial Approach. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Mehta, A. (1985). How Advertising Response Modeling (ARM) Can Influence Advertising Effectiveness. Journal Of
Advertising Research, 33(3), pp.62-74.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
141
Mertens, D. (2005). Research methods in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative and qualitative
approaches. (2nd Ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Mertens, D. (2012). What Comes First? The Paradigm or the Approach?. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 6 (4), 255-
257.
Michell, L (1999) ‘Combining focus groups and interviews: telling how it is;telling how it feels’ in Barbour, R & Kitzinger,
J (1999).
Mitchell, V. and Boustani, P. (1994). A Preliminary Investigation into Pre- and Post-Purchase Risk Perception and
Reduction. European Journal of Marketing, 28(1), pp.56-58.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA:
Sage.
Miles, M. and Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks [u.a.]: Sage.
Morgan, D.L. (1988) Focus groups as qualitative research. London: Sage.
Moschis, G, & Moore, R (1982), 'A Longitudinal Study of Television Advertising Effects', Journal Of Consumer Research,
9, 3, pp. 279-286, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 5 April 2015.
Moschis, G and Mitchell, L (1986) ,"Television Advertising and Interpersonal Influences on Teenagers' Participation in
Family Consumer Decisions", in NA - Advances in Consumer Research Volume 13, eds. Richard J. Lutz, Provo, UT :
Association for Consumer Research, Pages: 181-186.
Muehling, D. (1987). An Investigation of Factors Underlying Attitudes-Towards-Advertising-In-General. Journal Of
Advertising, 16(1), pp.32-40.
Mutch, C. (2005) Doing Educational Research: A Practitioner’s Guide to Getting Started. Wellington: NZCER Press.
Naik, N & Peters, K. (2009). A hierarchical marketing communications model of online and offline media
synergies. Journal of Interactive Marketing. 23 (4), 288-299.
Neuman, L. W. (2000). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (4th Ed.), USA: Allyn and
Bacon.
Newman, J and Staelin, R (1972) “Prepurchase Information Seeking for New Cars and Major Household Appliances”,
Journal of Marketing Research, August, 9, 247-297.
Öberseder, M; Schlegelmilch, B and Gruber, V (2011) "Why Don’t Consumers Care about CSR?" - A Qualitative Study
Exploring the Role of CSR in Consumption Decisions. Empirical Paper. Journal of Business Ethics, 104 (4). pp. 449-
460.
Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as theory. In E. Ochs and B. B Schiefflin (Eds.), Developmental pragmatics (pp. 43–72). New
York: Academic.
Ofcom. (2013). Digital Agenda Scoreboard 2012. Available: https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/sites/digital-
agenda/files/scoreboard_life_online.pdf . Last accessed 10th Apr 2015.
Oliver & Ohlbaum Associates Ltd, (2013). Research on local advertising markets. [online] Available at:
http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/research_on_local_advertising_markets.pdf [Accessed 1 Apr. 2015].
Olshavsky, R and Granbois, D. (1979). Consumer Decision Making - Fact or Fiction?. Journal of Consumer Research, . 6
(1), 93-100.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Peterson, R. Balasubramanian, S & Bronnenberg, B, (1997) Exploring the implications of the Internet for consumer
marketing, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 25 329–346.
Pinheiro, MT & Veríssimo, JM (2013). Marketing and “Social Media: Benefits, and Ways Forward. Proceedings of the 3rd
Conference of the International Network of Business and Management Journals
PWC. (2014). IAB / PwC Digital Adspend Study. Available: http://www.iabuk.net/research/digital-adspend. Last accessed
8th Apr 2015.
Rice, P., & Ezzy, D. (1999). Qualitative research methods: A health focus. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Rigby, C. (2014). UK shoppers spent £91bn online in 2013 – and look set to spend £107bn in 2014. Available:
http://internetretailing.net/2014/01/uk-shoppers-spent-91bn-online-in-2013-and-look-set-to-spent-107bn-in-2014/ . Last
accessed 10th Apr 2015.
Robson, C. (1993), Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioners-Researchers, Blackwell,
Oxford.
Robson, C (2002) Real world research. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
Robson, C (2011) Real World Research. 3rd ed. London: Wiley. 20-40.
Rosenberg, L. and Hirschmann, E. (1980). Retailing Without Stores. Harvard Business Review, 58(July-Aug), pp.103-112.
Sandage, C. and Leckenby, J. (1980). Student Attitudes Toward Advertising Institution vs. Instruments.Journal Of
Advertising, 9(2), pp.29-32.
Saunders, M., Lewis, P. and Thornhill, A. (2009) Research Methods for Business Students, 5th edition, Harlow: Pearson.
Saunders, M Et Al (2012). Research Methods for Business Students. 6th ed. London: Prentice Hall. 50-75.
Schramm, W. (1969). Aging and mass communication. In M. W. Riley, |. W. Riley, & M. E. Johnson (Eds.), Aging and
society (Vol. 2) (pp. 353-375). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Scotland, J. (2012). Exploring the Philosophical Underpinnings of Research: Relating Ontology and Epistemology to the
Methodology and Methods of the Scientific, Interpretive, and Critical Research Paradigms. English Language Teaching.
5 (9), 9-16.
Settle, R., Alreck, P. and McCorkle, D. (1994). Consumer perceptions of mail/phone order shopping media. J. Direct Mark.,
8(3), pp.30-45.
Simpson & Mortimore (2015) “The influence of direct mail marketing on buyer purchasing decisions.” JRSBM: 1/1 pp119-142
Journal of Research Studies in Business & Management Vol. 1. August 2015
142
Shah, N Kwak, R. Holbe, D. (2001). "Connecting" and "Disconnecting" With Civic Life: Patterns of Internet Use and the
Production of Social Capital. Political Communication, 18(2), pp.141-162.
Shankar, A & Patterson, M (2001) Interpreting the Past, Writing the Future, Journal of Marketing Management, 17:5-6, 481-
501.
Shenton, A. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22,
pp.63-75.
Sheth, J. (1975). HOWARD'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO MARKETING: SOME THOUGHTS*.Available:
https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/bitstream/handle/2142/32693/howardscontribut251shet.pdf. Last accessed 10th Apr 2015.
Shukla, P (2012),"The influence of value perceptions on luxury purchase intentions in developed and emerging markets",
International Marketing Review, Vol. 29 Iss 6 pp. 574 - 596
Silverman, D (2001) Interpreting qualitative data: methods for analysing talk, text and interaction, 2nd ed. London: Sage.
Simon, H. (1959). Theories of Decision-Making In Economics and Behavioural Science. The American Economic Review,
49(3), pp.253-283.
Sinkovics, R., R., Penz, E., & Ghauri, P., N. (2005). Analysing Textual Data In International Marketing Research.
Qualitative Market Research, 8(1), 9.
Solomon, B. (1994). TV shopping comes of age. Management Review, 83(9), 22-26
Speziale, H. and Carpenter, D. (2008). Qualitative research in nursing. Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Speziale, H. and Carpenter, D. (2010). Qualitative research in nursing. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Statista, (2015). Facebook: figures of monthly active users 2014 | Statistic. [online] Available at:
http://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/ [Accessed 15 Apr.
2015].
Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Strauss, J., Ansary, A. and Frost, R. (2001). E-marketing. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Sutherland, M. (1998). Role of Advertising: Persuasion or Agenda-Setting?. [online] Available at:
http://www.sutherlandsurvey.com/Columns_Papers/Role%20of%20Advertising%20Persuasion%20or%20Agenda-
Setting.pdf [Accessed 1 Apr. 2015].
Sykes, W. (1990). Validity and Reliability in Qualitative Market Research: A Review of the Literature. Journal of the
Market Research Society, 32(3), 289-328.
The Guardian. (2014). Facebook: 10 years of social networking, in numbers. Available:
http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/feb/04/facebook-in-numbers-statistics. Last accessed 8th Apr 2015.
Tuli, F. (2010) “The basis of distinction between Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Social Science: Reflection on
Ontological, Epistemological and Methodological Perspectives”, Ethiopian Journal of Education and Science, (6) 1. Travers, M (2001) Qualitative Research Through Case Studies Introducing Qualitative Methods, Sage Publications (CA).
TSAO, J. and SIBLEY, S. (1999). Displacement and Reinforcement Effects of the Internet and Other Media as Sources of
Advertising Information. J. Adv. Res., 44(1), pp.126-142.
Tsao, J, and Sibley, S (2004). Displacement and reinforcement effects of the Internet and other media as sources of
advertising information. J. Advert. Res. 44(1):126-142.
Twitter, (2015). About Twitter, Inc. | About. [online] Available at: https://about.twitter.com/company [Accessed 15 Apr.
2015].
Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., and Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive Measures: Nonreactive Measures in the
Social Sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Weitz, B. and Wensley, R. (2002). Handbook of marketing. London: SAGE.
Wells, J, Valacich, J, & Hess, T (2011) 'WHAT SIGNAL ARE YOU SENDING? HOW WEBSITE QUALITY
INFLUENCES PERCEPTIONS OF PRODUCT QUALITY AND PURCHASE INTENTIONS', MIS Quarterly, 35, 2,
pp. 373-A18, Business Source Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 8 April 2015.
Weng, J (2013) "Consumers' personal values and sales promotion preferences effect on behavioural intention and purchase
satisfaction for consumer product", Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 25 Iss: 1, pp.70 - 101
Yakup, D. (2011). The Impact of Cultural Factors on the Consumer Buying Behaviors Examined through An Impirical
Study. nternational Journal of Business and Social Science. 4 (2), 109-115.
Yoon, E., Guffey, H. and Kijewski, V. (1993). The effects of information and company reputation on intentions to buy a
business service. Journal of Business Research, 27(3), pp.215-228.
Zeithaml, V. (1988). Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of
Evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(3), p.2.
Zhang, L., & Yao, T. S. (2003). Filtering junk mail with a maximum entropy model. In Proceeding of 20th international
conference on computer processing of oriental languages (pp. 446-453).