Upload
keelty
View
24
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Influence of Diel Vertical Migration on Krill Recruitment to Monterey Bay. Sarah Carr Summer Internship Project Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute Mentor: Francisco Chavez and Tim Pennington. Background. Using coupled biological-physical model Physical model: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The Influence of Diel Vertical Migration on Krill Recruitment to Monterey Bay
Sarah CarrSummer Internship Project
Monterey Bay Aquarium Research InstituteMentor: Francisco Chavez and Tim Pennington
Background
• Using coupled biological-physical model• Physical model:
– ROMS circulation model (UCLA) used to generate current velocity fields of Monterey Bay region
• Coupled model:– Krill (E. pacifica) modeled as Lagrangian drifters
with diel vertical migration (DVM)– Idealized scenarios (passive and idealized DVM)
applicable to other organisms
ROMS Setup
• Grid:– 1.6 km resolution near Monterey Bay– 5 km resolution regionally– Variable vertical resolution (20 sigma levels)
• Driver: Coamps/Quickscat blended wind product
• Time: October 1999 - September 2000
• “Offline” Model Runs: ROMS velocity fields recorded 2X daily and averaged
Grids and Sample Model Output
5 km resolution 1.6 km resolution
Experimental Design• Behaviors
– Passive– Set DVM
• Swimming speed = 50, 100, 200, 300 m/hr (0.01 - 0.08 m/s)
• Vertical velocity = Model vertical velocity + Swimming speed
– Ontogenetic changes in DVM capacity of E. pacifica
Experimental Design
• Release locations:– Horizontal
• 10 krill sampling locations in Monterey Bay
– Vertical• Passive- Surface,
50, 100, 200, 300 m
• All DVM- Surface
Experimental Design• Release times:
– Daily at midnight
– 3 seasons • Upwelling (March- May)
• Oceanic (August-October)
• Davidson (November-January)
• Duration of tracking:– Idealized Behaviors- 20
days
– Krill- ~ 6 mo.
Average alongshore current velocity at the M1 mooring. Figure from Chavez et al. 2002.
Results: Model Sensitivity
• Starting Location• Starting Time:
– Hour
– Day
– Season
• Starting Depth• Behavior
Note: The following results are for particles started at these locations on six consecutive days in January and July 2000.
Temperature/Velocity Fields at Start of Simulations
Sensitivity to Start Time: Season
Sensitivity to Behavior
Sensitivity to Initial Depth-
July 2000
Suggestions?
• Experimental design:– Behavior
– Release locations (H,V)
– Release time
– Duration of tracking
• Visualization– Trajectories (2D, 3D)
– Particle Density