7
1 The Importance of Using an Endurance Machine in conjunction with the Chain Efficiency Tester for Endurance Testing. Addressing Muc-Off’s claim that the UFO Chain increases to 14 watts during a ride. - Muc-Off recently released a brochure which included data regarding the long-term performance of the UFO Chains. This document addresses the misleading nature of Muc-Off’s data. Based on what we know of Muc-Off’s testing procedure, we assume this misleading data is caused by incorrect methods of acquiring ‘endurance test’ data. We describe the correct test methods, and show the results of a correct test as well the results of a test recreating the misleading data. In the following paragraph, we will discuss how and why using the wrong test machines can provide misleading data. This is followed by a thorough discussion of how we assume Muc-Off has performed their testing which is supported by a replication of their assumed testing method compared to the correct method. As the results will show, the two different ways of performing the testing, leads to two very different data results. 1.1 How can misleading data be created from an Endurance Test? Based on the test results Muc-Off presented, we must assume that they performed the ‘endurance tests’ with their tester in “Full Tension” mode. While this mode provides the most precise measurement of friction in a chain, it is designed to be used only for short-term friction measurements. The “Full Tension” mode should never be used for long-term endurance testing. For long term testing, an Endurance Machine should be used to more accurately simulate an actual bike drivetrain. Alternatively, for the purest ‘endurance test’ possible, the chain should be ridden on an actual bike for several hours with pre-ride and post-ride friction measurements taken using the Full Tension Tester. In the following we will discuss how a Full Tension Tester used for long-term testing will cause misleading data. 1.2 Why should the Full Tension Tester not be used for long-term testing? When attempting to accurately determine the “Friction vs. Time” graph for endurance testing purposes, both the Full Tension Tester and an Endurance Machine must be used. The Full Tension Tester is used solely for obtaining friction measurements and the Endurance Machine is used for subjecting the chain to long-term run times under load. The Full Tension Tester measures chain friction by applying high levels of tension symmetrically on two chain spans. Rear derailleur chain spans are not present on a Full Tension Tester. Granted, this type of tester produces the most precise chain friction measurements of any test method. Yet the constant

The Importance of Using an Endurance Machine€¦ · CeramicSpeed has carried out an endurance test to illustrate the difference between a correct and incorrect test protocol. A single

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Importance of Using an Endurance Machine€¦ · CeramicSpeed has carried out an endurance test to illustrate the difference between a correct and incorrect test protocol. A single

1

TheImportanceofUsinganEnduranceMachineinconjunctionwiththeChainEfficiencyTesterforEnduranceTesting.

AddressingMuc-Off’sclaimthattheUFOChainincreasesto14wattsduringaride.

-

Muc-Offrecentlyreleasedabrochurewhichincludeddataregardingthelong-termperformanceoftheUFOChains.

ThisdocumentaddressesthemisleadingnatureofMuc-Off’sdata.BasedonwhatweknowofMuc-Off’stestingprocedure,weassumethismisleadingdataiscausedbyincorrectmethodsofacquiring‘endurancetest’data.Wedescribethecorrecttestmethods,andshowtheresultsofacorrecttestaswelltheresultsofatestrecreatingthemisleadingdata.

Inthefollowingparagraph,wewilldiscusshowandwhyusingthewrongtestmachinescanprovidemisleadingdata.ThisisfollowedbyathoroughdiscussionofhowweassumeMuc-Offhasperformedtheirtestingwhichissupportedbyareplicationoftheirassumedtestingmethodcomparedtothecorrectmethod.Astheresultswillshow,thetwodifferentwaysofperformingthetesting,leadstotwoverydifferentdataresults.

1.1HowcanmisleadingdatabecreatedfromanEnduranceTest?

BasedonthetestresultsMuc-Offpresented,wemustassumethattheyperformedthe‘endurancetests’withtheirtesterin“FullTension”mode.Whilethismodeprovidesthemostprecisemeasurementoffrictioninachain,itisdesignedtobeusedonlyforshort-termfrictionmeasurements.The“FullTension”modeshouldneverbeusedforlong-termendurancetesting.Forlongtermtesting,anEnduranceMachineshouldbeusedtomoreaccuratelysimulateanactualbikedrivetrain.Alternatively,forthepurest‘endurancetest’possible,thechainshouldberiddenonanactualbikeforseveralhourswithpre-rideandpost-ridefrictionmeasurementstakenusingtheFullTensionTester.

InthefollowingwewilldiscusshowaFullTensionTesterusedforlong-termtestingwillcausemisleadingdata.

1.2 WhyshouldtheFullTensionTesternotbeusedforlong-termtesting?

Whenattemptingtoaccuratelydeterminethe“Frictionvs.Time”graphforendurancetestingpurposes,boththeFullTensionTesterandanEnduranceMachinemustbeused.TheFullTensionTesterisusedsolelyforobtainingfrictionmeasurementsandtheEnduranceMachineisusedforsubjectingthechaintolong-termruntimesunderload.

TheFullTensionTestermeasureschainfrictionbyapplyinghighlevelsoftensionsymmetricallyontwochainspans.RearderailleurchainspansarenotpresentonaFullTensionTester.Granted,thistypeoftesterproducesthemostprecisechainfrictionmeasurementsofanytestmethod.Yettheconstant

Page 2: The Importance of Using an Endurance Machine€¦ · CeramicSpeed has carried out an endurance test to illustrate the difference between a correct and incorrect test protocol. A single

2

tensionloadingconditionsdonotmimicatruebicycledrivetrain,andinaccurateresultsforlong-termchainendurancemeasurementscanoccur.

Simplyput,theFullTensionTesterwasdesignedforshort-term,high-precisionfrictionmeasurements.Toperformproperendurancetestingofachain,thechainshouldbetestedonFullTensionTesterforaninitial

frictionmeasurement,thenswappedandlong-termtestedonarigthatissetuptorepresentabicycledrivetrain,withtruedrivepoweratthering,loadonthecog,andarearderailleursetup,suchasanEnduranceMachine,orevenanactualbicycle.Afterthechainisrununderloadforagivenamountoftime,thechainshouldbetransferredbacktotheFullTensionTestertogetasubsequentfrictionmeasurement.

Itisirrelevanttotestwhetherachainremainsfast(retainslowfriction)forlongperiodsoftimeontheFullTensionTester,asnobikechainiseveratsymmetricalfulltensionforseveralhours.Putdifferently,theFullTensionTesterdoesnotreflectareal-usescenario.

FulldescriptionsofthetwotypesofequipmentcanbefoundontheFrictionFactssite.

http://www.friction-facts.com/equipment/full-tension-test-method

http://www.friction-facts.com/equipment/chain-full-load

1.3The‘SlackingEffect’

TheissueswithusingtheFullTensionTesterforlongtermtestingarisefromthefactthatthechainisalwaysunderheavytension,onbothupperandlowerspans,andthechainisneverallowedtoslack.Inatruebicycledrivetrain,thechainslacksasitsnakesthroughtherearderailleur.Whenthechainslacks,thelubricants(solidsorliquids),onamicroscopiclevel,areredistributed,andthecontactlinesoftheslidingsurfacesareconstantlyshifting,continuouslycreatingnewcontactlinesoflubricant.Thisslackingrefreshesthechainandallowsthelubricanttoperformforlongdurations.

This‘slackingeffect’wasdiscoveredin2015byFrictionFacts.ItwasrecognizedthatduringlongertestingperiodsontheFullTensionTester,somelubricantswouldshowabnormalincreasesinfriction.DuringtestingofachainexperiencingthisabnormalincreaseinfrictionontheFullTensionTester,thechainfrictionwouldinstantlydropbackdowntoanormallevel,yetslowlycreepupagainovertime,iftheloadwasremovedforafewseconds,withtheequipmentstillturning(ie,thechainwasslacked),andtheloadthenre-applied.Thisphenomenoncouldeasilyberepeatedmanytimesduringasinglelong-termtestrun,quicklyliftingandre-applyingtheloadtoslackthechainandthefrictionlevelswouldreturntonormal.

Page 3: The Importance of Using an Endurance Machine€¦ · CeramicSpeed has carried out an endurance test to illustrate the difference between a correct and incorrect test protocol. A single

3

Thisbehaviourofrisingfrictionlevelsoverlongerperiodsduetoafully-tensedchainisobviouslynotconducivetoaccuratelong-termtesting.ToconfirmtheFullTensionTesterwasnotsuitableforlongtermmeasurementsbasedonthetheorythattheFullTensionTesterdidnotallowslacking,endurancetestingwasperformedonmultiplechainsamplestoexposethedifferencesbetweenusingonlytheFullTensionTesterversustheFullTension/EnduranceMachinecombination.TheFullTension/EnduranceMachinecombinationproducedtherepeatableandrealisticresultsexpectedinthistypeofalong-termtestsituation.

Afterconfirmationtestingprovedthistheory,thefindingsledtotheprotocolofusing1)afull-fledgedreplicaofabicycledrivetrainforlongevityloading(theEnduranceMachine),and2)usingtheFullTensionTesteratpre-describedintervalsforobtainingprecisionfrictionmeasurements.Undoubtedly,thefindingsprovedtheFullTensionTestercannotbeusedaloneforlongtermendurancetests.

Becauseofthisdiscovery,FrictionFactsdevelopedanewEnduranceTestprotocol,whichincorporatedtheuseofanEnduranceMachineinconjunctionwiththeFullTensionTesterforaccurate,fair,andrepeatable“frictionvs.time”endurancetesting.Inthefollowingparagraphs,wewilldiscusswhyitappearsthatMuc-Offarebasingtheirtestresultsonincorrecttestingmethodsandasaconsequenceofthat,haspublishedmisleadingdata.Thediscussionisbasedonassumptionssincewewerenotpresentduringthetesting,buttheseassumptionsissupportedbyathoroughreplicationoftheassumedtestingmethodcomparedtothecorrecttestingmethodsasbeingdiscussedinthepreviousparagraphs.

TogetthefullunderstandingofhowandwhyweassumeMuc-Offhascomeupwiththisdata,pleasereadthebelowdiscussion.

2.1WhyisitassumedthatMuc-OffperformedtheendurancetestingwithonlytheFullTensionTester?

The‘slackingeffect’abnormalityiseasilydetectableonany“chainfrictionvs.time”graph.Theslackingeffectpresentsitselfasarelativelylargerate-of-increaseinfrictionovertime,withadrasticdecreaseinfrictionwhenthefulltensionisremovedandre-applied,followedbyasubsequentincreaseinfrictionsimilartotheinitialincreaseinfrictionbeforethechainwasslacked.

Forthisdocument,FrictionFactsperformedanendurancetestusingtheincorrecttestprocedures,effortlesslyrecreatingsimilar(andincorrect)datatothedatathatMuc-Offpublished.Atestusingthecorrectprocedureswasalsoperformed,highlightingtheproceduralerrors,andprovingtheUFOChainisa4-wattchain,nota14-wattchain.Thisreplicationofdatacanbeseeninalatersection.

Muc-Offoriginallyproducedthe“UFOchainfrictionvstime”graphwithtwodaysofdata,Day1andDay2,usingthesameUFOChainforbothdays(seeGraph1).NotehowtheUFOChain’sfrictionlevelsdroppedfrom14+wattsdownto6wattswhenthechainwasremovedfromtheFullTensionTesterafterDay1andre-testedforthesubsequentDay2testrun.

ThisdrasticdropintheUFOChainfrictionobviouslybegsthequestion;Howcouldachainget8wattsfasterbysittingovernight?Theanswerisitdidn’tget8wattsfaster.Thechainwasnevera“14-watt

Page 4: The Importance of Using an Endurance Machine€¦ · CeramicSpeed has carried out an endurance test to illustrate the difference between a correct and incorrect test protocol. A single

4

chain”tobeginwith,eventhoughtheFullTensionTesterwasputtingoutthisdata.TheFullTensionTesterwasproducingincorrectandexcessivelyhighfrictionreadingsduetothelongdurationtest.Thisisundoubtedlyduetothe‘slackingeffect”,andisatell-talesignthattheFullTensionTesterwasemployedincorrectlyforlongtermtestinginthiscase.

Graph1:Muc-Off’soriginalgraphshowingaUFOChaindecreasing8wattsovernight,betweenDay1andDay2testing.

Muc-Off’soriginalgraphindicatessomethingispotentiallyflawedwiththetestduetotheinstantaneousdropinfrictiononthesameUFOChainbetweentestruns.WhentherecentNTCChainbrochurewaslaunched,the“Day2”datacontainingtheanomalywasremovedfromthegraph(seeGraph2).

Page 5: The Importance of Using an Endurance Machine€¦ · CeramicSpeed has carried out an endurance test to illustrate the difference between a correct and incorrect test protocol. A single

5

Graph2:The“revised”graphasseenintheNTCBrochure.TheDay2datawasdeletedforthepublicationoftheNTCbrochure.

CeramicSpeedhasnowayofknowingifMuc-Offisawareoftheconsequencesofthe‘slackingeffect’phenomenaorindeedwhythegraphwasrevised.

Regardlessofthat,an8-wattimmediatedecreaseinchainfrictionbetweentestruns,onthesamechain,shouldquicklyraiseeyebrowsinanysituation,andMuc-Offoughttohaverevisitedtheirtest.

2.2ReplicationofMuc-Off’sEnduranceTestandSubsequentDataCollected

CeramicSpeedhascarriedoutanendurancetesttoillustratethedifferencebetweenacorrectandincorrecttestprotocol.

AsingleCeramicSpeedUFORacingChain(KMCversionforthesakeoftesting)wasruncontinuouslyfora4-hourendurancetest.Thefirst3hoursofthetestwereperformedproperly.The4thhourwasperformedincorrectly.Thegraphbelowisanactual“printscreen”fromthetester.Ithasnotbeenalteredormanipulatedinanywayexceptfortheaddedtext.

Page 6: The Importance of Using an Endurance Machine€¦ · CeramicSpeed has carried out an endurance test to illustrate the difference between a correct and incorrect test protocol. A single

6

Forthefirstthreehours,thechainwasrununder250WloadontheEnduranceMachine.At15-minuteintervals,thechainwasremovedfromtheEnduranceMachine,placedontotheFullTensionTesterfora1-minutefrictionmeasurement,andthenplacedbackontheEnduranceMachine.Notethestable,realistic,andexpectedbehaviouroftheUFOChain.Thefrictionlevelsmaintainamid4-wattrangeforthefirstthreehoursofthetest.

Afterthe3-hourcorrecttest,theincorrecttestprocedurewasinitiated.ThechainwasremovedfromtheEnduranceMachineandplacedontheFullTensionTester.However,thechainwasallowedtoremainontheTensionTesterforonehour.NotetherelativelyfastincreaseinfrictionlevelswhenthechainisontheFullTensionTesterforthislongperiodoftime.Thissteadyincreaseinfrictionduringthe4thhourisverysimilartotheUFOChainfrictionincreaseseeninMuc-Off’sgraph.

Afteranhouroftheincorrectprocedure,thechainwasremovedfromtheFullTensionTesterandplacedbackontheEnduranceMachinefor10minutes,toallowthechaintoslackthroughtherearderailleurspans,andthenafinalfrictionreadingwastakenontheFullTensionTester.Thefinalfrictionreadingwas4.75W.

Thistestshowshowfrictionmeasurementscanincorrectlyclimbwhenachainisrunlong-termonaFullTensionTester,andhowthefrictionalmostimmediatelydropstooriginallevelswhenthechainistakenoffthetesterandallowedtoslack.ThedatafromthisincorrecttestissimilartoMuc-Off’soriginalgraph.ThechainfrictionincreasedsignificantlyduringDay1underFullTension,thensuddenlydroppedduetoslackingattheendofDay1,thenthefrictionincreasedagainduringDay2underFullTensionTester.

ThistestalsoprovesthataUFOChainmaintainssub5-wattfrictionlevelat250Wover4hours.

Asmentionedearlier,theFullTensionTesteristheonlyknownwaytomeasurechainfrictionprecisely,butmustbeusedforshortdurationstoobtainaccuratefrictionreadings.

BothCeramicSpeed’sFrictionFactslabintheUS,andtheirtestlabattheDenmarkheadquartershavematchingFullTensionTestersandEnduranceMachines.Anyandallendurancetestingisperformedwiththeproperprotocol,byusingthesetwomachinestogether.

Page 7: The Importance of Using an Endurance Machine€¦ · CeramicSpeed has carried out an endurance test to illustrate the difference between a correct and incorrect test protocol. A single

7

Severalmonthsago,CeramicSpeedtestedvariousfactory-treatedchainsforcomparisonpurposes.Thegraphbelowshowstheresultsaproperlyperformed,realisticendurancetest,usingthetwomachines.

Pleasenote,thattheMuc-OffNanotubeChainwasn’treleasedatthetimethistestingwasperformed.TheMuc-OffchaininthisgraphisthereforenottheNanotubeChainbuttheMuc-OffNTOCChain(NanotubeOptimisedChain).

CeramicSpeedhaspubliclypostedthe“EnduranceTestProtocol”forpurposesoftransparencyandintegrityintestmethodology.

Theprotocolcanbefoundonlinehttp://www.ceramicspeed.com/sport/techlab/tests/chain-efficiency-over-time/.