2
1 The Importance of Preserving Issues for Appellate Review Commentary by Bradley A. Muhs, Daily Business Review Bradley A. Muhs is a commercial litigator with Trenam Law in Tampa In 2014, the last year for which data is available, Florida's state courts received 27,305 incoming appellate cases. This put Florida second in the nation for the number of incoming appeals, behind only California. Nationwide, approximately one in five civil trials results in an appeal. These numbers illustrate that litigants must be mindful of the possibility their case could result in an appeal. Preserving Error One of the most important things a litigant can do to prepare for the possibility of an appeal is to preserve error for appellate review. "Preservation" in the legal context stands for the proposition that the trial court should have an opportunity to address an issue raised before it prior to an appellate court's review. Except in rare circumstances, an appellate court will not consider an issue that was not raised in the trial court. Florida case law has established four basic elements of preserving error for appellate review: timeliness, specificity, ruling and record. Timeliness requires that the trial attorney object at or reasonably near the time the error occurred, so as to allow the trial court an opportunity to correct the error. Specificity requires that the exact legal argument a party intends to raise on appeal must have been put before the trial court. Ruling requires a decision be made by the trial court on the litigant's objection. A record is a transcript or other evidence of the timely, specific objection and ruling. Without such a record, the appellate court often will presume no error occurred.

The Importance of Preserving Issues for Appellate Reviewtrenam.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/...May 02, 2017  · Commentary by Bradley A. Muhs, Daily Business Review Bradley

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Importance of Preserving Issues for Appellate Reviewtrenam.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/...May 02, 2017  · Commentary by Bradley A. Muhs, Daily Business Review Bradley

1

TheImportanceofPreservingIssuesforAppellateReview CommentarybyBradleyA.Muhs, Daily Business Review

BradleyA.MuhsisacommerciallitigatorwithTrenamLawinTampa 

In2014,thelastyearforwhichdataisavailable,Florida'sstatecourtsreceived27,305incomingappellatecases.ThisputFloridasecondinthenationforthenumberofincomingappeals,behindonlyCalifornia.Nationwide,approximatelyoneinfiveciviltrialsresultsinanappeal.Thesenumbersillustratethatlitigantsmustbemindfulofthepossibilitytheircasecouldresultinanappeal.

Preserving Error

Oneofthemostimportantthingsalitigantcandotoprepareforthepossibilityofanappealistopreserveerrorforappellatereview."Preservation"inthelegalcontextstandsforthepropositionthatthetrialcourtshouldhaveanopportunitytoaddressanissueraisedbeforeitpriortoanappellatecourt'sreview.Exceptinrarecircumstances,anappellatecourtwillnotconsideranissuethatwasnotraisedinthetrialcourt.

Floridacaselawhasestablishedfourbasicelementsofpreservingerrorforappellatereview:timeliness,specificity,rulingandrecord.Timelinessrequiresthatthetrialattorneyobjectatorreasonablynearthetimetheerroroccurred,soastoallowthetrialcourtanopportunitytocorrecttheerror.Specificityrequiresthattheexactlegalargumentapartyintendstoraiseonappealmusthavebeenputbeforethetrialcourt.Rulingrequiresadecisionbemadebythetrialcourtonthelitigant'sobjection.Arecordisatranscriptorotherevidenceofthetimely,specificobjectionandruling.Withoutsucharecord,theappellatecourtoftenwillpresumenoerroroccurred.

Page 2: The Importance of Preserving Issues for Appellate Reviewtrenam.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/...May 02, 2017  · Commentary by Bradley A. Muhs, Daily Business Review Bradley

2

Whilethesefactorsdemonstratehowtopreserveerroratahearingortrial,litigantsmustbepreparedtopreserveissuesforappellatereviewatallstagesoflitigation.Forinstance,anappellatecourtwillnotreviewatheoryofliabilityoradefensethatwasnotincludedintheparty'spleadingorraisedbymotion.Atthesummaryjudgmentstage,litigantsmustensurethatallevidenceinsupportordefenseofamotionforsummaryjudgmentisproperlyfiled,servedandidentifiedtomakeaproperrecordfortheappellatecourt.If,indefenseofamotionforsummaryjudgment,alitigantobjectstotheadmissibilityofsupportingevidence,heorshemustmakethatobjectionontherecordorelseriskwaivingtheargumentforappeal.Atjuryselection,ifanobjectiontoaparticularjurorisnotraisedduringvoirdireandthenrenewedbeforethejurypanelissworn,theobjectioniswaivedforappeal.Aftertrial,aninconsistentverdictmustbeobjectedtobeforethejuryisreleasedandamotionforrehearingisrequiredtopreserveerrorsappearingforthefirsttimeinthejudgmentitself.

Determining Case Finality Before Appeal

Inmostcircumstances,anappellatecourtwillnothearacaseuntilafinaljudgmenthasbeenenteredbythetrialcourt.Therequirementof"finality"isnotalwaysaseasytoidentifyasitseems.Forexample,anordergrantingamotionforfinalsummaryjudgmentisnotnecessarily"final"butiftheordergrantingfinalsummaryjudgmentcontainslanguagesignifyingthatthecourtisenteringfinaljudgment,thentheorderisdeemedafinaljudgment.Followingentryofafinaljudgment,thelitiganthasonly30daystofileanoticeofappeal.Understandingwhenacourt'sorderisafinal,appealablejudgmentiscrucialtopreservingtherighttoappeal.

Inlimitedcircumstances,theappellatecourtwillhearcasesonnonfinaltrialcourtorders.TheFloridaRulesofAppellateProcedurecontainalistofenumeratednonfinalordersthattheappellatecourtwillreviewpriortoentryofafinaljudgment,includingordersconcerningvenue,determiningjurisdiction,andgrantingordenyinginjunctiverelief.Othernonfinalordersmaybeheardattheappellatecourt'sdiscretionunderitscertiorarijurisdictionpriortoentryoffinaljudgment,butonlyifthelitigantdemonstratesthatthetrialcourt'sorderwillcauseirreparableharmthatcannotberemediedonappeal.

Conclusion

Whilethisisjustanabbreviatedlookatsomeofthenecessarystepslitigantsshouldbetakingattrialtopreparethemselvesforthepossibilityofappeal,therearemanyotherconsiderationsforthisvitalaspectoflitigation.Preservationoferrorischiefamongthosesteps;withoutproperlypreservinganobjectionorargumentinthetrialcourtbelow,andwithoutmakingarecordshowingthatthespecificobjectionorargumentwasmade,theappellatecourtlikelywillrefusetoreviewtheissue.

Beyondsimplepreservationoferror,navigatingtheappellateprocesscanbeadauntingtaskforanyattorney.Asaresult,manylitigantsconferwithanappellateattorneyduringtrialproceedings,haveanappellateattorneysitatcounseltableduringtrialtoensureallnecessaryproceduralstepsarebeingtaken,orotherwiseoutsourcetheirappellateissuestoattorneyswhospecializeinappellatepractice.Whateveroptionyoutake,besuretoprepareforthepossibilityofanappeal,andtakethestepsnecessarytoprotectyourselfandyourclient.

BradleyA.MuhsisacommerciallitigatorwithTrenamLaw(Tampa).Hemaybereachedat727‐820‐[email protected].