Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
TheImportanceofPreservingIssuesforAppellateReview CommentarybyBradleyA.Muhs, Daily Business Review
BradleyA.MuhsisacommerciallitigatorwithTrenamLawinTampa
In2014,thelastyearforwhichdataisavailable,Florida'sstatecourtsreceived27,305incomingappellatecases.ThisputFloridasecondinthenationforthenumberofincomingappeals,behindonlyCalifornia.Nationwide,approximatelyoneinfiveciviltrialsresultsinanappeal.Thesenumbersillustratethatlitigantsmustbemindfulofthepossibilitytheircasecouldresultinanappeal.
Preserving Error
Oneofthemostimportantthingsalitigantcandotoprepareforthepossibilityofanappealistopreserveerrorforappellatereview."Preservation"inthelegalcontextstandsforthepropositionthatthetrialcourtshouldhaveanopportunitytoaddressanissueraisedbeforeitpriortoanappellatecourt'sreview.Exceptinrarecircumstances,anappellatecourtwillnotconsideranissuethatwasnotraisedinthetrialcourt.
Floridacaselawhasestablishedfourbasicelementsofpreservingerrorforappellatereview:timeliness,specificity,rulingandrecord.Timelinessrequiresthatthetrialattorneyobjectatorreasonablynearthetimetheerroroccurred,soastoallowthetrialcourtanopportunitytocorrecttheerror.Specificityrequiresthattheexactlegalargumentapartyintendstoraiseonappealmusthavebeenputbeforethetrialcourt.Rulingrequiresadecisionbemadebythetrialcourtonthelitigant'sobjection.Arecordisatranscriptorotherevidenceofthetimely,specificobjectionandruling.Withoutsucharecord,theappellatecourtoftenwillpresumenoerroroccurred.
2
Whilethesefactorsdemonstratehowtopreserveerroratahearingortrial,litigantsmustbepreparedtopreserveissuesforappellatereviewatallstagesoflitigation.Forinstance,anappellatecourtwillnotreviewatheoryofliabilityoradefensethatwasnotincludedintheparty'spleadingorraisedbymotion.Atthesummaryjudgmentstage,litigantsmustensurethatallevidenceinsupportordefenseofamotionforsummaryjudgmentisproperlyfiled,servedandidentifiedtomakeaproperrecordfortheappellatecourt.If,indefenseofamotionforsummaryjudgment,alitigantobjectstotheadmissibilityofsupportingevidence,heorshemustmakethatobjectionontherecordorelseriskwaivingtheargumentforappeal.Atjuryselection,ifanobjectiontoaparticularjurorisnotraisedduringvoirdireandthenrenewedbeforethejurypanelissworn,theobjectioniswaivedforappeal.Aftertrial,aninconsistentverdictmustbeobjectedtobeforethejuryisreleasedandamotionforrehearingisrequiredtopreserveerrorsappearingforthefirsttimeinthejudgmentitself.
Determining Case Finality Before Appeal
Inmostcircumstances,anappellatecourtwillnothearacaseuntilafinaljudgmenthasbeenenteredbythetrialcourt.Therequirementof"finality"isnotalwaysaseasytoidentifyasitseems.Forexample,anordergrantingamotionforfinalsummaryjudgmentisnotnecessarily"final"butiftheordergrantingfinalsummaryjudgmentcontainslanguagesignifyingthatthecourtisenteringfinaljudgment,thentheorderisdeemedafinaljudgment.Followingentryofafinaljudgment,thelitiganthasonly30daystofileanoticeofappeal.Understandingwhenacourt'sorderisafinal,appealablejudgmentiscrucialtopreservingtherighttoappeal.
Inlimitedcircumstances,theappellatecourtwillhearcasesonnonfinaltrialcourtorders.TheFloridaRulesofAppellateProcedurecontainalistofenumeratednonfinalordersthattheappellatecourtwillreviewpriortoentryofafinaljudgment,includingordersconcerningvenue,determiningjurisdiction,andgrantingordenyinginjunctiverelief.Othernonfinalordersmaybeheardattheappellatecourt'sdiscretionunderitscertiorarijurisdictionpriortoentryoffinaljudgment,butonlyifthelitigantdemonstratesthatthetrialcourt'sorderwillcauseirreparableharmthatcannotberemediedonappeal.
Conclusion
Whilethisisjustanabbreviatedlookatsomeofthenecessarystepslitigantsshouldbetakingattrialtopreparethemselvesforthepossibilityofappeal,therearemanyotherconsiderationsforthisvitalaspectoflitigation.Preservationoferrorischiefamongthosesteps;withoutproperlypreservinganobjectionorargumentinthetrialcourtbelow,andwithoutmakingarecordshowingthatthespecificobjectionorargumentwasmade,theappellatecourtlikelywillrefusetoreviewtheissue.
Beyondsimplepreservationoferror,navigatingtheappellateprocesscanbeadauntingtaskforanyattorney.Asaresult,manylitigantsconferwithanappellateattorneyduringtrialproceedings,haveanappellateattorneysitatcounseltableduringtrialtoensureallnecessaryproceduralstepsarebeingtaken,orotherwiseoutsourcetheirappellateissuestoattorneyswhospecializeinappellatepractice.Whateveroptionyoutake,besuretoprepareforthepossibilityofanappeal,andtakethestepsnecessarytoprotectyourselfandyourclient.
BradleyA.MuhsisacommerciallitigatorwithTrenamLaw(Tampa).Hemaybereachedat727‐820‐[email protected].