Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
TITLE PAGE
THE IMPACT OF THE CONFLICT AMONGST THE
WARRIOR CLASS MEMBERS TO JAPAN’S 16TH
CENTURY FEUDAL SYSTEM IN EIJI YOSHIKAWA’S
TAIKO
AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS
Presented as a Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
forthe Degree of Sarjana Sastra
in English Letters
By
PATRICIA PARAMITHA
Student Number: 164214075
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS
FACULTY OF LETTERS
UNIVERSITAS SANATA DHARMA
YOGYAKARTA
2020
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vi
MOTTO PAGE
Out of breath in my lungs
From the small window reflects the inverted head and
Morning glories racing for growth.
-Tigridia-
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
vii
DEDICATION PAGE
For my beloved individuals
who have kept me alive until this day.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
viii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE ........................................................................................................... i
APPROVAL PAGE ................................................................................................. ii
ACCEPTANCE PAGE ........................................................................................... iii
STATEMENT OF ORIGINALITY ........................................................................ iv
LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH UNTUK
KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS .................................................................................. v
MOTTO PAGE ....................................................................................................... vi
DEDICATION PAGE ............................................................................................ vii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................................................................... viii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS...................................................................................... x
ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................ xi
ABSTRAK ............................................................................................................. xii
CHAPTER I: BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY ................................................... 1
A. Background of the Study ................................................................................. 1
B. Research Questions .......................................................................................... 4
C. Objectives of the Study .................................................................................... 5
D. Definition of Terms .......................................................................................... 5
CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF LITERATURE .......................................................... 6
A. Review of Related Studies ............................................................................... 6
B. Review of Related Theories ............................................................................. 9
C. Theoretical Framework .................................................................................. 27
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY ....................................................................... 29
A. Object of the Study ...................................................................................... 29
B. Approach of the Study .................................................................................. 30
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
ix
C. Method of the Study ..................................................................................... 30
CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS ................................................................................... 32
A. The Conflict amongst the Warrior Class Members in Eiji Yoshikawa’s
Taiko ............................................................................................................... 32
B. The Impact of the Conflict towards the Feudal System in Japan ...................... 47
C. The Effect of the Conflict towards Current Society ........................................ 58
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION .............................................................................. 70
REFERENCES ....................................................................................................... 72
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
x
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
On my last days of being a member of Sanata Dharma University, I
would like to send my gratitude towards all of the peers that have provided
me with experiences and life advice during my studies for a bachelor’s
degree.
I would like to send my deepest gratitude to my thesis advisor, Dr.
Tatang Iskarna who has been patient and helpful in this research, and also
my co-advisor, Dra. Th. Enny Anggraini, Ph.D., who also helped me in
this research.
Last of all, I would like to thank my mother and my friends who
have been the greatest support in completing my studies. Thank you to my
best friend, Deborah for being so patient and kind in dealing with me
during my studies. Thank you to Chris, Rania, Nina, and especially Ersya
for being such good support in my darkest times, I would have been in a
very horrible condition without you all. Thank you to Hinako and Takuhiro
who have been so helpful and considerate in helping me to give a clearer
perspective of Japan. Thank you to everyone who I couldn’t mention for
the support and heads-up. May life bring you the joy that you wanted!
Patricia Paramitha
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xi
ABSTRACT
PARAMITHA, P. (2020). The Impact of the Conflict amongst the
Warrior Class Members to Japan’s 16th Century Feudal System in
Eiji Yoshikawa’s Taiko.Yogyakarta: Department of English Letters,
Faculty of Letters, Universitas Sanata Dharma.
This thesis is aimed at describing the conflict amongst the members
of the Warrior class, especially Shogun, Daimyō, and Samurai to gain
control over Japan in the 16th century in Eiji Yoshikawa’s Taiko, a novel
written in 1967 in Japanese and translated into English in 2001. Besides, it
also depicts how the conflict impacts the structure of Japan’s feudal system
and how the novel, as produced in a certain culture, social and intellectual
context gives the effect to the Japanese society.
This thesis uses library research and applies the historical approach. The
theories employed are the theory of conflict, either conflict in literary work
proposed by X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia or sociological context stated
by Max Weber and Lewis Coser’s, and the historical background of the
feudal system in Japan in the 16th century described in some sources.
The findings of the research are as follows. The conflict amongst the
members of the Warrior class in Japan is the conflict between a group of
society against another group; the conflict begins with the conflict between
Oda Nobunaga as a part of the Daimyō against the warrior-monks of
Mount Hiei. After winning against the war that leads to the fall of Mount
Hiei and the defeat of the warrior-monks, Oda Nobunaga encountered a
new conflict with Shogun Yoshiaki as his opponent due to political
disagreement. The Oda clan later won against Shogun Yoshiaki in political
war. The whole reason why Oda Nobunaga took down his opponents is to
gain control over Japan. The conflict gave some impact towards Japan’s
feudal system in the 16th century in the way that it switched the feudal
structure of Japan from the Shogun authority to the Daimyō authority and
changed the perspective of the Japanese society towards the Warrior-class
itself.
From the perspective of the historical context, the novel gives the effect of
familiarity to the current reader, in the way that the readers can compare
the situation between the conflicts that happened in 16th century Japan to
the issues in 21st century Japan. This thesis analyze of the Warrior class
with the government of Japan. Especially the similarities it brings in the
conflict between the Daimyō and the Shogun to the conflict between the
Prime minister and the governor of Tokyo in their involvement in current
Japanese issues that have been going for decades.
Keywords: Warrior class, Japanese Feudal System, Social conflict
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
xii
ABSTRAK
PARAMITHA, P. (2020). The Impact of the Conflict amongst the
Warrior Class Members to Japan’s 16th Century Feudal System in
Eiji Yoshikawa’s Taiko.Yogyakarta: Department of English Letters,
Faculty of Letters, Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menggambarkan konflik antara
anggota kelas Prajurit, terutama Shogun, Daimyō, dan Samurai untuk
mendapatkan kendali atas Jepang pada abad ke-16 dalam novel Taiko oleh
Eiji Yoshikawa. Sebuah novel yang ditulis pada tahun 1967 dalam bahasa
Jepang dan diterjemahkan ke dalam bahasa Inggris pada tahun 2001.
Selain itu, ia juga menggambarkan bagaimana konflik berdampak pada
struktur sistem feodal Jepang dan bagaimana novel, yang diproduksi dalam
budaya, konteks sosial dan intelektual tertentu memberikan efek kepada
masyarakat Jepang.
Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kepustakaan dengan penerapan
pendekatan historis. Teori yang digunakan adalah teori konflik, baik
konflik dalam karya sastra yang diajukan oleh X.J. Kennedy dan Dana
Gioia atau dalam konteks sosiologis yang dikemukakan oleh Max Weber
dan Lewis Coser. Latar belakang sejarah sistem feodal di Jepang pada abad
ke-16 akan dijelaskan dalam beberapa sumber.
Konflik di antara anggota kelas Prajurit di Jepang adalah konflik antara
kelompok masyarakat terhadap kelompok lain. konflik dimulai dengan
konflik antara Oda Nobunaga sebagai bagian dari Daimyō melawan para
Sohei di Gunung Hiei. Setelah menang melawan perang yang
menyebabkan jatuhnya Gunung Hiei dan kekalahan para biksu-prajurit,
Oda Nobunaga menghadapi konflik baru dengan Shogun Yoshiaki sebagai
lawannya karena ketidaksepakatan politik. Klan Oda kemudian menang
melawan Shogun Yoshiaki di perang politik. Oda Nobunaga menurunkan
lawan-lawannya untuk mendapatkan kendali atas Jepang. Konflik ini
memberikan beberapa dampak terhadap sistem feodal Jepang pada abad
ke-16 dengan cara mengubah struktur feodal Jepang dari otoritas Shogun
ke otoritas Daimyō.
Dari perspektif konteks historis, novel ini memberikan efek familiaritas
kepada pembaca saat ini, dengan cara yang pembaca dapat
membandingkan situasi antara konflik yang terjadi di Jepang abad ke-16
dengan masalah di Jepang abad ke-21. Penelitian ini menganalisa kelas
Prajurit dengan pemerintah Jepang. Terutama kesamaan yang membawa
konflik antara Daimyō dan Shogun dengan konflik antara Perdana Menteri
dan gubernur Tokyo dalam keterlibatan mereka dalam masalah-masalah
Jepang saat ini yang telah berlangsung selama beberapa dekade.
Keywords: Warrior class, Japanese Feudal System, Social conflict
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study
Based on real historical events and figures, Eiji Yoshikawa’s Taiko is a
story of a young child who became one of Japan's greatest unifiers. This
research analyses the concept of feudalism depicted through the society
during the Sengoku Era as recorded in the novel Taiko written by Eiji
Yoshikawa, translated into English by William Scott Wilson.
This research observes the conformity of East Asian culture into western
theories, especially through the social system in Japan during the Sengoku
Era. This observation is concerned with the idea of feudalism in Japan. John
Whitney Hall’s explanation about feudalism in Japan points out that the main
doubt that is presence in this research
American historians who reject this view are apt to be reminded by their
Japanese colleagues that they have spared the onus of living under
feudalism and hence cannot appreciate its reality. Certainly, the American
scholar does not commute through the countryside which to him
constitutes a living reminder of “the feudalism of the village” (Hall &
Jansen, 1968, p. 1).
Hall’s concern of the western concept applied to the Japanese culture raises
two basic historiographical issues: the idea of feudalism itself and its
appropriateness as a general category of social organization.
In this research, the researcher attempts to observe of the feudal system in
the novel Taiko by Eiji Yoshikawa which firstly observes the
historiographical idea of feudalism in the 16th century Japan as depicted in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
2
the novel and correlates them to the impact of the feudal system towards the
socio-political system in the current era of Japan. To eliminate the general
possibility of the result, the researcher narrows down the observation of the
feudal system through the conflicts that circled around the Warrior class.
As an English literary researcher who lives in Asia, the researcher should
be encouraged to take a look at English translated literary works which depict
the historical and cultural sense of the book itself. In terms of explaining
historical studies, the researcher observes the meaning of history itself to the
study of literature:
The very term literature points to another way in which history is relevant
to literary study. We tend to take the term for granted as if it were yoked
unproblematically to a referent. But what it designates in one historical
society or culture--what counts as literature, what is expected of literature,
the place literature occupies in the cultural system---may not be the same
as what it designates in another. (Gossman, 1994, p. 94)
In Gossman’s argument, the researcher observes that the term of literature,
it must have placed respectively as a literary object. The study of history itself
is deemed to be critically relevant as every setting, every storyline or plot
have their own historical aspect to it, where its majority or a minor role
towards the literary work itself. To this research, the researcher attempts to
provide a sample of a historical study towards an East Asian culture. From
this case, the researcher takes a deeper look at the socio-cultural aspect of the
feudal system of Japan in Eiji Yoshikawa’s Taiko as a medium in order to
observe today’s issues.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
3
In observing historical records of the characteristics of feudal Japan,
Toyoda T.’s argument about the concept of the feudal system in Japan is
applied. Toyoda’s argument about the economic history of the feudal society
in Japan provides a deeper analysis of the socio-economic system of feudal
Japan, as feudal lords during the era exercised self-assumed authority in each
district of Japan, competing for their ascendance with each other. The world,
as Toyoda described, was apt to become disunited one after the other which
led to anarchy. Toyoda provided a great comparison to a very similar
phenomenon of the European feudal age of each King of France, England,
and Germany, etc. whose crown was guaranteed by the Pope (Toyoda, 1957,
pp. 29-35). With Toyoda’s concept of Japanese feudalism, the researcher
could finally correlate it with the novel Taiko’s plot as a historical novel.
The researcher attempts to provide a sheer look at the Japanese past
history as a developed country. In accordance to Edwin O. Reichaver’s
observation on why all of the countries in the world observe that the Japanese
society had developed itself by the 19th century. His argument leads to the
signs of changes behind the feudal facade. His findings were started from the
16th century Japan that during the 16th century, the Japanese society and the
feudal system, and even the ruthless Edo regime could not force them back
into a political and economic unification across the country. With the new era,
Japan aims to produce a more peaceful balance of living. The Japanese prime
minister, Shinzou Abe is aiming for peaceful agreement with international
relations with other countries. Through literary observation, the researcher
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
4
could picture a situation and development of Japanese society in the 16th
century as a rather lesson of what the Japanese society attempts to achieve
with the new era.
The researcher observes how Japanese society values productivity as their
main compass of daily lives. As the researcher knows from the feudal concept
proposed in the novel that there is a conflict of creating a unified country and
producing a one-unified leadership across Japan by stagnating the social
norm. People who are wealthy in Japanese society during the era become
wealthier and the poor are deemed to stay on their position as a laborer and
obeying their lord’s deeds. The concept of productivity is reflected by the
four-tiered feudal system and continues on towards the postmodern era of
Japan. This feudal facade was of course not all negative. The factor of
applying social stagnation impacts political control as there are fewer people
claiming towards the position of a government official. In this case as a
shogunate: making the government officials become more productive in
establishing international relations as they had closed the country beforehand
due to the warring states. From this system, the researcher observes the
significance of the conflict proposed above reflected by the postmodern era of
Japan.
B. Research Questions
This undergraduate thesis aims to answer several questions related to the
topic, as follows:
1. What is the conflict amongst the Warriors class described in Taiko?
2. How does the conflict the Japanese Feudal system in Taiko?
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
5
3. What is the writer’s message to the current society through the
conflict in Taiko?
C. Objectives of the Study
This research has a purpose to describe the conflict amongst the Warrior
class during 16th century Japan from the novel Taiko by Eiji Yoshikawa
through understanding the situation of settings in feudalism. It also observes
the visualization of the Warrior class and the situation of the society during
the Sengoku Era, supported by historical studies provided by scholarly
sources. The impact of conflict then will be applied through textual evidence
and supported by proper theories as provided in the theoretical framework.
This research also observes the understanding of the western theories of
feudalism applied to eastern culture, in this case, the Japanese culture as a
study of a historical study to correlate with the current society and observation
of the current state of a socio-political era in Japan after the era shift to a new
era.
D. Definition of Terms
Warrior Class Members. The term Warrior Class members refer to
Shogun, Daimyo, and Samurai in this research. The term itself is derived from
Cartwright’s definition of the Samurai: The Warrior class in 16th century
Japan is different from the previous year as they’re not only working as
military personnel but also work as a governing role. The Samurai from the
Kamakura period (1185-1333 CE) is new government personnel that was
founded which was dominated by warriors and led by a shogun (military
dictator); so it would remain right up until the 19th century CE.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
6
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE
A. Review of Related Studies
In this section of the thesis, the researcher discusses a review of related
studies that supports this thesis, a study conducted by another researcher who
observed through the same novel. Surya Pranata’s undergraduate thesis
discusses the motivation of Hideyoshi’s will to become a Samurai. In his
observation, he uses a psychological approach that is conducted through Mary
Rohberger and Samuel H.’s book Reading and Writing about Literature. In his
observation, he first described how Hideyoshi’s will to become a Samurai
started from the childhood of Hideyoshi’s life as described to be: a dreamer,
persistent individual, thorough and loyal pupil of Oda Nobunaga. Pranata
conducted his observation through western theories, applied through an eastern
culture and in his observation; he found that the core of Hideyoshi’s motivation
of becoming a Samurai is from the experience of his childhood, proven by
textual conduction and a supporting theory from A.H. Maslow’s theory in his
book A Theory of Human Motivation.
This study is related to the researcher’s topic of the depiction of the
Warrior class in which had been observed through Pranata's psychological
point of view. Although observed in a historical manner, the researcher was
able to correlate with Hideyoshi’s life as a peasant with the situation in 16th
century Japan. In Pranata’s thesis, he also underlines the situation of the
Peasant class reflected through other characters such as Hideyoshi’s mother and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
7
sister. Moreover, he also observes the tragic case of a foot soldier in the
Warrior class who had to live like a peasant.
Another related work is Hartadi Dwi’s journal that explains the human
relationship (Ningen Kankei) in Japan through the observation of the novel
Shinsho Taikoki (Taiko). His observation covers the first series of the serial
version of the novel Taiko. Through his observation, the concept of human
relationships as mentioned by Yoneyama is divided into four parts: muichi,
nakama,doho, and seken. Muichi is a relationship between two personals that
happened in small groups of relatives. Nakama is a relationship between two
personals in mutual attachments outside the family, such as close friends or
best friends. Doho means a group of people who get together and converse in a
personal way through parties, exercise, religious rituals, and other real-life
situations. Lastly, Seken, a relationship which has no correlation with personals
instead it is the relationship between human and all of the aspects in their lives.
Through the analysis which Hartadi conducted, the human relationship which
he observes through the character Toyotomi Hideyoshi as the protagonist is
observed by the three aspects which are listed above, excluding the concept of
Seken.
In relation to the researcher’s observation, Hartadi’s observation covers the
relationship between Hideyoshi and his mother during his childhood with his
step-father, his father, Yaemon before his death and his sister, Ofuku described
the concept of Muichi. In the concept of Nakama, Hartadi observed only
through interaction between Tokichiro (another name for Hideyoshi) with Oda
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
8
Nobunaga in their friendship throughout Tokichiro’s moral duty in Nobunaga’s
favor. Through the interaction between Hideyoshi and Akechi Mitsuhide as
personal endeavors, the concept of Doho applied in their involvement of the
rebellion.
This study relates to the sociological point of view of feudalism during the
era through the characters’ philosophical beliefs. As we know from Gossman’s
study of History and Literary Studies, claimed that philosophical belief is a part
of a historical study. There, the application of the major concept of human
relations is correlating to one another. Personal familiar relations were the
major effects of strong influence, in this case, the relation between Hideyoshi
and his surroundings.
What makes this study different is, of course, the observational point of
view. From the two studies, the researcher would not only take a deeper look at
the philosophical belief of the society from Hideyoshi’s side but on the
philosophical belief of the society from Oda Nobunaga who influenced
Hideyoshi in the first place. Nobunaga’s involvement in a certain event can
cause impacts that affect the development of the feudal system in Japan.
Through a philosophical belief of Nobunaga and his influence on the change in
the feudal system, the researcher is able to correlate the feudal system through
textual evidence that there is in fact, a change of the system which runs in the
country during the 16th century. The focus of this thesis would be more into the
sociological and historical point of view of society, eliminating the focus on
each character ad previously have been discussed by the previous researchers.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
9
B. Review of Related Theories
Taiko is an epic novel written by Eiji Yoshikawa. The novel tells a
story of three great unifiers of Japan during the Sengoku Era. Through the
story, the readers are delivered to the concept of feudalism in the novel. The
following theories would support the researcher conducting the study.
1. Theory of Conflict
This theory would be separated into two sub sections as it observe
same theory but in a different point of view.
a. Theory of Conflict in literature
The theory of conflict is studied from Master Class’ article about What Is
Conflict in Literature?
In literature, a conflict is a literary device characterized by a struggle
between two opposing forces. Conflict provides crucial tension in any
story and is used to drive the narrative forward. It is often used to reveal a
deeper meaning in a narrative while highlighting characters’ motivations,
values, and weaknesses (MasterClass, 2019).
A story must progress through conflict, which in this novel’s case the
rising of the feudal system in Japan with the class shift from the emperor’s
authority to the warrior’s authority. There are of course many cases on how
the conflict presented but for the sake of presenting the application of the
theory to the novel, as proposed in the article, the theory of conflict in
Literature is presented in two: Internal and External conflict.
Internal conflict is when a character struggles with their own opposing
desires or beliefs. It happens within them, and it drives their development
as a character. External conflict sets a character against something or
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
10
someone beyond their control. External forces stand in the way of a
character’s motivations and create tension as the character tries to reach
their goals. Including both internal and external conflict is crucial for a
good story, because life always includes both (MasterClass, 2019).
A citation from Grace Fleming on their journal “Conflict in Literature”
also agrees on the same, through their journal presented a distinct difference
of conflict through the role who are involved in a literary work itself. From
their journal, the researcher focuses on the definition of man vs. man as
shown below.
When you have both a protagonist (good guy) and antagonist (bad guy) at
odds, you have the man versus man conflict. Which character is which may
not always be evident, but in this version of the conflict, there are two
people, or groups of people, that have goals or intentions that conflict with
each other. The resolution comes when one overcomes the obstacle created
by the other (Fleming, 2018).
What the researcher would concern about is the role of the protagonist and
the antagonist. In Eiji Yoshikawa’s Taiko, the protagonist is apparent that it is
Toyotomi Hideyoshi, but in the researcher’s opinion, looking through the
perspective of Toyotomi Hideyoshi would be rather more personal compared
through Oda Nobunaga, another fact is that throughout the story, Toyotomi
Hideyoshi is mostly working under the influence of Oda Nobunaga’s power.
Thus, to set a clearer outline of this research, the main character who will be
Oda Nobunaga and the antagonist would be both the warrior-monks of Mount
Hiei and the Shogun.
The conflict also has significant points on roles to the plot of the story.
Whether a character is having an internal conflict between them or having a
struggle towards other individuals or groups. What is applied through his
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
11
thesis was the struggle of a group of individuals to fight against another group
of individuals.
b. Theory conflict in sociological point of view
Another apparent theory of conflict is shown by Lewis Coser’s theory of
conflict through a sociological point of view. As also discussed through the
previous theory, the conflict theory is observing the general contours of
conflict of the society within it through the perspective of each class. The
citation below explains the general concern of conflict theory which correlates
to the distribution of power in a society.
In general, conflict theory seeks to scientifically explain the general
contours of conflict in society: how conflict starts and varies, and the
effects it brings. The central concerns of conflict theory are the unequal
distribution of scarce resources and power (Allan, 2006, p. 213)
While there is the conflict theory applied to this novel, the concept of
contemporary conflict in the researcher’s opinion gives an interesting point
upon this work. Coser’s theory of conflict is mainly concerned between
structural functionalism and conflict theory. He wrote that there is a basic
correlation between the structures of society with conflict that they have
experienced in a certain community through predicting the level of violence.
This level of violence is a determination of how severe the impact of the
conflict is to the general contribution of the society within it. If the conflict
can be resolved in a rational manner, it is more likely that the involvement of
violence is less happening. Although, conflict can be violent and Coser gives
two factors that can produce violent conflict: emotional involvement and
transcendent goals. What it respectively translates is in order to achieve a
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
12
transcendent goal, an emotional involvement must be present and the media
or people who are involved within it must be engaged. The more transcendent
goals there are, the greater the violence can be. (Allan, 2006, p. 217). This
theory itself sought the actions of a general of a certain Warrior class in
launching a war against the opponent and proves that when coordinating with
their opponent, the Warrior class also counts the rational measurement of
violence that is involved in the conflict itself.
The conflict theory which presented by Coser also argues that while the
general source of conflict that is presented by Karl Marx, it is better to be
understood that in Marx’s idea of conflict that mostly inspires the researchers
on the idea of conflict, there still needs a modification of understanding which
are supposed to be brought onto more consideration. The idea of deprivation
can be an ideal modifier of the conflict theory as it notes the shift from
absolute to relative deprivation is significant to produce a critical awareness
of the conflict at hand. This relative deprivation refers to a sense of being
underprivileged to some other person or group. It is simply a sense of being
on acknowledging the fact that others are doing better than themselves. These
people who felt a sense of being are most likely to become involved in the
conflict and social change (Allan, 2006, p. 216). While the idea of Marx’s
conflict theory arose in the 18th century, it is relevant to seek the authenticity
of the applied theory to the current era. Thus, an interpretation of Marx’s
conflict theory by Coser is applied to support the correlation between conflict
in the 16th century and the reflection of the conflict in the current era.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
13
1. The 16th Century Feudal System in Japan
The concept of Feudalism is first discovered from the medieval model of
government. The theory of Feudalism in Japan and the theory of Feudalism in
the European medieval era contrast a difference between the two. The general
view of the Feudal system and the Japanese Feudal System are conceptualized
by Kallie Szczepanski in her comparison between the French Feudal system
with the Japanese Feudal System through the great French historian Marc
Bloch who defined French feudalism as a subject of the peasantry which is
widespread use of the service tenement instead of a salary. Although there
are some similarities of the French feudal system towards the Japanese feudal
system such as the figurehead which is placed on top of the class tier followed
by nobles and knights and how the Warrior class had provided their lower-
class tier a piece of land in an area which they’re ruling in. The class tiers had
shown a large difference in the middle class and lower class tier. In other
words, peasants or serfs in French are tied to the land and work for the
protection afforded by the landlord thus sharing the initial harvest, rather than
money in return. French warriors dominate society and are bound by codes of
ethics. Nobles, which are a smaller unit of lords, control the warrior and
peasants, while still showing obedience to a distant and relatively weak duke,
king or emperor (Szczepanski, 2019).
The Japanese feudal system, in contrast to the french, appreciates more
productivity and harvests compared to incomes. The Japanese feudal society
had put the peasants working solely as middle-class farmers because they
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
14
provide harvests such as rice to the society and put the merchants and traders
in the lower class tier due to their lack of productivity (at least compared to
the farmers). In a speech of the Japanese feudal system, Szczepanski also
provides of the beginning of the Japanese Feudal System as the first start of
the socio-political system to work in the country itself, the Japanese feudalism
was based on the ideas of the Chinese philosopher Kong Qiu or Confucius
(551–479 BCE). Confucius stressed morality and filial piety, or respect for
elders and superiors. In Japan, it was the moral duty of the Daimyō and
Samurai to protect the peasants and villagers in their region. In return, the
peasants and villagers were duty-bound to honor the warriors and pay taxes to
them (Szczepanski, 2019).
In order to help with the visualization of the Japanese Feudal Society, the
research proved a diagram which views the feudal system from the diagram
provided by http://medievaljapanalyssa.weebly.com/feudal-system.html.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
15
The development of a feudal society in Japan had been developed from the
tenth and eleventh centuries when the Fujiwara clan had entered the spotlight
of the stage of Japanese history, but, despite the brilliance of the literary and
artistic accomplishment of the country they dominated. The courtiers were
going through the forms of ceremonies of little more than a sham government,
and devoting their energies more to the arts of poetry-writing and love-
making than governing, making the provincial aristocrats gains more
experience in managing their estates and ruling the peasants of these estates
with hardly any control or direction. The growth and change in the feudal
system itself arose from the overflow of the appearance of Mongols in the
late twelve century as invaders and raided certain small islands in northern
Kyushu. In the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries presented a picture of
increasing political disruption and confusion, as all central control slowly
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
16
disappeared. The basic cause for the growing political disunity itself was the
main reason why the Warrior class had increased during the Kamakura period
which made a united government based simply ties of personal loyalty was no
longer possible. Feudal lord, or Daimyō, in order to restore the unity which
proved to be as slow progress as their main goal had caused the knight to fall
into irrelevance (Reischauer, 1974, pp. 45-67). This concept of provincial
aristocrats ruling their own capital correlates to the situation of the setting in
the novel whereas the emperor had not shown a signify interest in intervening
the political matter of the Samurai and the warring states of his own country
despite the fact that he was the head of the country and let the Daimyōs as the
powerful ruling class taken the position to overruled the country with their
authority.
A feudal society is a military hierarchy in which a ruler or lord offers
mounted fighters a unit of land to control in exchange for military service.
The individual who accepted this land became a vassal, and the man who
granted the land became known as his liege or his lord (Kip Wheeler, 2018).
This is correlated to the concept of feudalism in Japan written in Comparative
Studies in Society and History by John Whitney Hall. In his observation, the
Japanese feudalism developed upon a foundation laid in the semi-feudal land
ownership pattern of the villages.
In accordance with the concept of feudal society, Szcezpanski proposed a
comparative approach. Szczepanski’s article explains about the four-tiered
class system of feudal Japan. In her article, she explained how feudalism in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
17
Japan differs from the European concept of feudalism. Feudalism in Japan did
not put the peasants on the lowest rank compared to the European concept.
They believe in productivity, as the peasants such as farmers are considered as
the middle class. Artisans, however, are considered less important even
though they provided cooking utensils, woodblock prints, and other aesthetics
needs for the Daimyōs and emperor. Strangely enough, the Samurai
swordsmiths have even ranked the third tier in feudal Japan. On the bottom of
the tier, there are merchants who include traveling traders and shopkeepers.
Merchants were often ostracized as "parasites" that profited from the labor of
the more productive peasant and artisan classes. Not only did merchants live
in a separate section of each city, but the higher classes were forbidden to mix
with them except when conducting business.
The role of the Daimyō itself has dictated most of both the political and
social flow of the country. In her other article, Szcezpanski’s take on the
feudal lord in Shogunate Japan explains about the first men who became the
eventual governor of Japan called the Daimyō.
The word "Daimyō" comes from the Japanese roots "dai," meaning "big or
great," and "myo," or "name." It roughly translates in English to "great
name." In this case, however, "myo" means something like "title to land,"
so the word really refers to the Daimyō's large landholdings and would
most likely literally translate to "owner of great land." (Szcezpanski, 2019).
In Eiji Yoshikawa’s Taiko, the Daimyō play a very prominent role through
the development of feudalism in Japan. Before Japan was unified by the three
greatest unifiers, each continent fought with one another to find the next ruler
of Japan, which caused the Sengoku Era. The Daimyō played a prominent
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
18
rule due to their authority on the country and the emperor was not present at
that time. Later Sengoku era finally ended when the three unifiers of Japan
(Oda Nobunaga, Toyotomi Hideyoshi, and Tokugawa Ieyasu) brought the
Daimyōs to heel and re-concentrated power in the hands of the Tokugawa
shogunate. Under the Tokugawa shoguns, Daimyō would continue to rule
their provinces as their own personal fiefdoms, but the shogunate was careful
to create checks on the independent power of the Daimyō.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
19
2. The Current Socio-political Situation in Japan
To a recession to the current era, the role of an emperor as a figurehead
was that of a figure who represented the country as a cultural symbol. This
concept has also been held as a traditional order of succession as on a socio-
political structure, it has become an apparent theme. While in the following
years of their socio-political structures this concept was translated in a similar
meaning yet in various different ways. As an example, the current era emperor
has pledged to become the symbol of state and unity as an interpretation of
their modern outlook (BBC.2019). That is to say that the emperor is willing to
aid the change of the era and step onto the real world problems, yet what had
seem to be the trouble on this concept is often, and yet crucial, the people under
the emperor or the political officials interpret the idea in a different way as the
emperor. In question: How does the same concept of the traditional order
interpreted differently? This due to the effects of the sociological environment
of their privacy, which in view doesn’t implement the same as it is generally
implemented in the outside world. As discussed in the previous chapter, the
Japanese culture adores the idea of productivity; this idea also translates to their
work ethic as it mostly requires collective decision-making. Japanese generally
place a high emphasis on group mentality and believe that the formation of a
well-rounded character is attained by learning to be cooperative with others.
Therefore, in Japanese society, assertiveness is considered a vice, and
compromise is considered a virtue. The Japanese culture also emphasizes the
culture of amae and enryo as a part of their work ethic. Both concepts are
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
20
counter-balances to each other, amae being presuming on the goodwill of
others and enryo being the one holds back on the basis that one must not
presume too much on the goodwill of others (Yohko, 2006). In a sense, the
emperor’s deeds to focus on the needs can be seen as a good cause to the
country, while the government can be practicing on the idea of enryo as a part
to deduce the goodwill which spreads across the nation.
On the other hand, Sugimoto Yoshio’s book introduces the sociological
point of view of Japanese society which affects their political views. In his
book titled ‘An Introduction to Japanese Society’, Sugimoto explains the
democracy of the Japanese political system which affects both the economic
and the socio-cultural society that is used in the twenty-first century. The
Japanese system had an interchanging correlation throughout the years,
although it can be viewed that the political system that most impacted the
country today was the democratical system that they formed after World War
II.
At the beginning of the twenty-first century the Japanese national ethos
continues to be glorified in a variety of cultural arenas. Saito, for instance,
produced many bestselling works that admire the beauty of the Japanese
language. In praise of the ‘dignity of the Japanese nation’, Fujiwara
maintained that the Japanese must revive the Samurai spirit rather than
pursuing democracy, and must restore Japan’s traditional warm emotions
and feelings rather than adhere to Western-style logic (Sugimoto, 2010, p.
36)
In the quotation above, Sugimoto explained how democracy in Japan
differs from the democracy which is formed in most democratic countries. In
meaning the formation of the Japanese democracy was to revive the spirit of
their Samurai ancestors and preserve the glory of their cultural belief. In many
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
21
cases, Japanese society was deeply influenced by their culture, including
producing a social awareness of today’s issues.
Sugimoto’s theory of the Japanese society is used to explain the correlation
of the role of the Warrior class in the Japanese feudal system with modern-day
parliament.
Before heading to the interpretation of the conflict, one must understand
the current situation of the Japanese government system. Being that the
Japanese social and political situation currently has been indirectly divided by
two sectors: the working-class and the government. This is partially due to their
lack of support from the working-class upon the faith of their political standing.
In a recent report, conducted The Genron NPO surveyed that in September of
2019, 25.3 percent of Japanese citizens are optimistic about the future of the
nation while 57.3 percent of Japanese citizens feel pessimistic. In the question:
what are the Japanese citizens actually concerned about to their nation? The
survey shows that they’re most concerned about social security and climate
issues, followed by the concern of the population decline and rapid aging of
society. The reason behind this social decline is mostly involved by democracy
in Japan (Aizawa, 2019).
Yu Uchiyama, a professor of political science at the University of Tokyo,
said the findings are worrying. "The most critical point is that only the
judiciary has the people's trust, and lawmakers have lost it. Democracy
relies on a balance of the judicial, legislative and executive branches," he
says. He also noted that only 40 percent of people said they thought
democracy was the best possible kind of political system (Aizawa, 2019).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
22
Democracy in Japan did not run well amongst the working-class society.
Currently, the Japanese political system runs in democracy under constitutional
monarchy, similarly occurred in England. The governmental power in Japan is
distributed between three branches: the National Diet, the Cabinet, and the
judiciary sections of the government. These entities serve as the legislative,
executive, and judiciary branches respectively (Neely, 2016).
Japanese National Diet which consists of the upper house of
representatives holds the highest power of the country along with the cabinet
who fails to see the problem of the decline in the Japanese political system that
leads to sociological troubles between the government and the society within
it. Japan’s Prime minister, Shinzo Abe was known to have a solution upon the
decrease of the country’s economy. However, the solution which he calls as
‘Abenomics’ to focus on increasing the economy was deemed at risk as the
program itself is now facing difficulties with Abe himself having lost his
interest upon fixing Japan’s economy. Interestingly, on a press conference held
in Chengdu, China, Abe stated that he was never interested in the economy, and
later instead, reciting his goal is to rip up Japan’s post war pacifist constitution
and restore the perceived glories of the prewar period under a powerful
emperor (Sposato, 2019). This critic itself had its own points as the goal in
which Abe had recited is in reference to his grandfather, Nobusuke Kishi who
strongly pushed a constitution change in the 1955 system. Worryingly, the
cause to change the constitution had seemed to be the main focus of Abe in
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
23
2020 while the country is also facing a shrinking population that leads to an
inevitable limited growth.
In discussion of the sociological problem in Japan, there are many aspects
that should be pointed out, the most concerning is the lower birth rate which
had been expected since 1899. This low birth rate is mostly caused by the work
environment that has been given to people in the working class. A report
conducted by the newsThesis, Asashi Shimbun that in 2018, 586,438 couples
got married, down by 20,428 from the previous year and the lowest number
since the end of the Second World War. A ministry official said: “Economic
conditions and the difficulty of simultaneously managing both work and child-
rearing are considered the major reasons behind the declining birth rates. We
need to promote policies to set up an environment where people who want to
have children can have children and raise them at ease.” (Giorando, 2019). The
decline of economic stability is affecting the lives of the working classes as
most married couples had to focus on their economic stability instead of raising
their children. What is concerning is this problem has made many families
decide to not have children after they get married. Japan’s decline on economic
stability is not only affecting the lives of married couples but also affecting the
mental state of their workers. Japantimes reported that in 2016, a 46-year-old
white-collar worker jumped to his death from the roof of a Subaru factory in
what authorities ruled was a case of karōshi (death from overwork).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
24
While the Japanese feudal system had met its end in 1867 and transfer its
government system into Meiji which marks the start of the Meiji era, the social
stagnation seemed to have given a memorable effect to the social discourse. In
regards to any era which the Japanese system had, the Japanese society
continues to embody the concept of productivity. As a result, the Japanese
society is now facing problem which arose due to their culture of promising a
better social life called “Karoshi” which means death from overwork. The main
reason why Karoshi had been an infamous trend across Japan is due to social
pressure which spread in several workplaces. OECD survey showed Japanese
had an average of 21 minutes less sleep in 2018 than they did in 2014. Jun
Kohyama, a neurologist at the Japanese Society of Sleep Research (JSSR), later
calls a higher general level of concern about the problem. “Japanese people
may have more awareness of sleep than before, but people tend to admire those
who are devoted to work and press on without enough sleep. I am concerned
that the situation hasn’t changed at all,” he says (Lewis, 2019). The case of
Karoshi itself has left Tokyo Governor, Yuriko Koike to step down and
mandated staff members in government offices to must go home by 8 p.m.
(Huang & Stapczynski, 2016). Another reason to this cause is the mentality of
the Japanese society has in working.
“While Western society is individualistic and non-hierarchical, Japanese
society is collectivist and hierarchical,” explains Hiroshi Ono, professor of
human resources management at Hitotsubashi University, who specialises
in Japan’s work culture. “Thus, many people refrain from taking holiday
because their bosses do not take holiday, or they are afraid that it will
disrupt the group harmony.” (Demetriou, 2020)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
25
From the citation above, the work mentality of the Japanese people are
different than the west, which they are more collectivist and hierarchical
compared to other western countries. The Japanese culture is very uniformed,
when one does not take a business leave, no matter the situation, everyone in
that company or group are most likely not going to take business leave despite
their personal needs. A recent study conducted by Demetriou also reveals that
there is a natural culture amongst the Japanese that there is a culture where a
person would be evaluated higher if the person is not taking days off and
working harder. People think taking days off is a bad thing. The effect of the
mindset is worrying that it often put people in the working class to work more
in order to get admiration and seen as a devoted worker. Another fact is to their
feelings upon guilt as shown below.
Japan scored lowest among 19 countries and regions in its 2018 study, with
workers taking on average only half their annual leave – 10 days out of 20.
As many as 58% of Japanese workers cited “feeling guilty” as the main
reason for not taking their entitled holiday leave in the 2018 Expedia report,
with only 43% stating that their employer was supportive of them taking
leave – the lowest globally (Demetriou, 2020).
While in the research conducted by Akina Murai, head of PR for Expedia
in Japan says that 62% of Japanese people within the age of 18 to 34 are
vacation deprived, that is to say that younger people are more exposed to
Karoshi due to the mentality that is circled around their position as employees.
Other problem that the Japanese currently have is the decrease of birth rate
that has long overdue (Giorando, 2019). The reason behind it is also due to
economic pressure which often pressure women and men to work more than
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
26
their regular shifts and often reason that there are very less time to spend on
child-bearing and household duties. A research conducted by East-West Center
provides a date which many of employment are listed as women. Their date
shows that the increase of women labor opportunity dictates the shrinking
employment of men. This research shows that history has a correlation between
history and the current society of Japan. The conflict which happened in Eiji
Yoshikawa’s Taiko proves that a historical conflict which happened in the past
may produce a long-term trail of the social configuration that may arise in the
future. To add more argument, problems to retired elderly people had seemed
to plumbing. With more people growing old and less people giving birth,
elderly people who have passed their youth life working and wasn’t able to find
partners have decided to live their life in a solitary existence.
A report by the South China Morning Post from 2017 called the
phenomenon as Kodokushi (Dying alone). This problem is growing in Japan,
where 27.7 percent of the population aged over 65 are filling up the residential
area across the nation and are threatened to die alone. With the lack of
governmental support, social workers are forced to step down to insist victims
of Kodokushi and bury them in their respectful resting place. Another
sociological problem is impacting the population. Hikikomori (recluses) are
widely known amongst the society. In modern days, the cause of this
phenomenon however is not related to a mental issue yet more into the social
situation which is affecting Japanese youth today. Saitou Tamaki, a psychiatrist
and professor from Tsukuba University who studied about Hikikomori for
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
27
decades observed that the occurrence of Hikikomori is a form of phase which
lasted for six months or more. He also stated that over 2 million people in Japan
including shut-ins are Hikikomoris. In his argument, the issue of having
hikikomoris in the country are causing more declination on the country,
especially when there is a decrease of population each year. Another fact that
arose is the involvement of the Japanese government towards the problems of
hikikomoris and aging (Nippon.com, 2019).
C. Theoretical Framework
The theories above would be used as a supporting idea to examine Eiji
Yoshikawa’s Taiko. Theories that would be used in this thesis would be the
theory of conflict and feudal system in Japan. The theory of Conflict comes
from Masterclass’s and Grace Fleming’s characterization of conflict in
literature, while the concept of feudalism in Japan comes from historical
records of the feudal era in 16th century Japan.
The first stage of observation would be determining the characteristics of
the Warrior class through general observation of the historical records and
textual evidence. After mentioning both characteristics, the researcher is now
able to determine the conflict between the two opposing classes with textual
evidence and understanding of the concept of feudalism; this is where the
theory of conflict will play as a prominent support of the researcher’s ideas. In
order to understand the genealogy of the feudal society, one must understand
the ruling class of the society; in this case, the Warrior class is depicted
accordingly. From the emperor's authority shogun to the powerful families
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
28
(Daimyō), to the Samurai and lastly the ronin in the Warrior class tier, through
the largest population of the Japanese society during the Sengoku era, the
peasants to lastly, artisans and merchants. By finding out the situations of the
society according to their status, the researcher could find that feudalism takes
its highest role of each Warrior class. The researcher later can determine how
the Warrior class, from the shogun to the Samurai, impacts their feudalism
towards the society, in this case the middle class of the Japanese feudal system.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
29
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
A. Object of the Study
The object of this Thesis would be the translated version of Eiji
Yoshikawa’s epic novel, Taiko. The novel itself was first published by
Kodansha in 1967, two years after the death of Eiji Yoshikawa. Later in 1992,
the novel was published in English and was translated by William Scott
Wilson. The novel is based on historical figures of the three great unifiers of
Japan. The novel tells the story according to the humble beginnings of
Toyotomi Hideyoshi as a peasant boy who rose to the top with his loyalty and
hard work to become a Samurai, following his father’s footsteps. He
eventually met Lord Nobunaga and requested to become his pupil. Under
Nobunaga’s lordship, he fought wars to acclaim the unification of Japan.
Nobunaga himself was exceedingly shrewd and ambitious on his own
lordship. He would not let anyone outcome his ambitions to overtake Kyoto.
When the warrior-monks or Sōhei became an increasing troop to beat,
Nobunaga let out a siege and thus the siege of mount Hiei started. The wiping
out of the Sōhei of mount Hiei itself was a fact of the final destruction of
Buddhism as a political force. Nobunaga and Hideyoshi, along with the
support of Tokugawa Ieyasu, continue to spread their political influence
across Japan.
This novel puts the role of Hideyoshi’s loyalty to his lord, Oda Nobunaga,
to a golden pedal stole. The man himself was a peasant, born with the face of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
30
a monkey, brings his smartness and his odd look to the center of the attention
of Nobunaga who was a Daimyō. When Nobunaga met his death, Hideyoshi
never stopped the cause of unifying the country. He continues on brooding the
country’s rebellion to social stagnation by putting out non-Samurai society’s
weapons out of their hands and leaves a legacy of great brilliance as a
memory of a Golden Age.
B. Approach of the Study
The approach of the study would be a historical approach. The approach
itself is conducted by X.J. Kennedy and Dana Gioia’s Literature: An
Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, and Drama, Sixth Edition. In their argument
that Historical Criticism “seeks to understand a literary work by investigating
the social, cultural, and intellectual context that produced it—a context that
necessarily includes the artist’s biography and milieu.” A key goal for
historical critics is to understand the effect of a literary work upon its original
reader. (Kennedy & Gioia, 1995, p. 1790)
C. Method of the Study
To further explain the methodology of the study, the researcher will
explain the methods of the study. The research would be conducted in several
steps as follows. The first stage of observation would be determining the
characteristics of the Warrior class through general observation of the
historical records and textual evidence. After mentioning both characteristics,
the researcher is now able to determine the conflict amongst the classes with
textual evidence and understanding of the concept of feudalism. This is where
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
31
the theory of conflict will play as a prominent supporter of the thesis ideas. In
order to understand the genealogy of the feudal society, one must understand
the ruling class of the society, in this case the Warrior class depicted
accordingly, from emperor, shogun to the powerful families (Daimyō), to the
Samurai, ronins as the Warrior class, through the largest population of the
Japanese society during the Sengoku era, the peasants to lastly, artisans and
merchants. By finding out the situations of the society according to their
status, the researcher could find the feudalism takes its highest role of each
Warrior class, the researcher later can determine how the Warrior class, from
the shogun to the Samurai reflects their feudalism towards the lower class
society, in this case, the middle class of the Japanese feudal system. Lastly,
The impact of these feudal systems itself would be observed through a cause-
and-effect method where the researcher would take a look at historical facts
which happened in the novel and correlates it with either the effects of the
situation that had occurred in both real-life situations and towards the plot of
the story itself.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
32
CHAPTER IV
ANALYSIS
A. The Conflict amongst the Warrior Class Members in Eiji Yoshikawa’s
Taiko
In the first section of this thesis, the researcher will explain the conflict
between the Peasant class and the Warrior class as shown in the novel in
accordance with the first problem formulation. To elaborate on the discussion
of the Warrior class in Taiko, there are several points that should be
established: The importance of social role in Warrior class,
1. The Importance of the Social Role in Warrior Class
The Warrior class was seen as prestigious because of its duty to serve the
country. Moreover, their role was seen as more influential compared to the
emperor’s, although their hierarchy is below the emperor. However, the
Warrior class was not only working as a military support; they also work as a
governing lord who established rules for the Peasant class. As explained by
Demetriou, the Japanese society are known as hierarchal, what it means that
the idea as a projection that the duty of a warrior is a form of relative
deprivation which they reflect themselves as unworthy of the figurehead and
the Peasant class who are under them also felt the sense of being on being less
worthy than the Warrior class towards the figurehead. The sense of
unprivileged is most often, in association that they also strive to become
privileged through the emperor’s eyes. This idea of relative deprivation can be
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
33
seen through the establishment of the Oda clan as landowner feudal lords,
who controlled each sector of the country, including farms and living areas.
The establishment between lands was separated by a social ‘border’. As
shown in the novel, the establishment rivalry of the social ‘border’ and
physical domain between the Samurai clans were clearly obvious.
The lord of Owari, Oda Nobuhide, and his neighbor, Imagawa
Yoshimoto, were bitter enemies, a situation that led to constant
skirmishing along their common border. One year, Imagawa troops crossed
the border, set fire to the villages, and trampled the crops. The Oda troops
rushed out of the castles of Nagoya and Kiyosu and routed the enemy,
cutting them down to the last man. When the following winter came, both
food and shelter were lacking, but the people did not reproach their lord. If
they starved, they starved; if they were cold, they were cold. In fact,
contrary to Yoshimoto's expectations, their hardships only served to harden
their hostility toward him. (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 5)
One of the famous warriors during the time was Oda Nobunaga, who was
directly involved in the conflict between the Samurai and the shogun. The
researcher would like to point back to the theory of conflict itself, which in
digress contemplates the subject of an individual’s influence to spread in
society. The influence of Oda Nobunaga as a core representative of the Oda
Clan came from Oda Nobunaga himself. Nobunaga was a noble born. He was
directing the son of the Oda Clan’s land owner or Daimyō, Nobuhide. He was
described living in a flourishing life of his father’s pride. This is how a proud
Daimyō such as the Oda Samurai influences his troops and the society
through his power. The following citation is an example of the influence of
the Oda clan in the Japanese feudal society. In the feudal society, the glory
and stories about feudal lords spread through the Peasant class. Most
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
34
importantly, the children or the younger generation as described below are
perfect examples of the social cultural trends which had been spreading in
their community.
The children had seen and heard about such things from the time they
were born. When they saw their lord's troops, it was as if they were
seeing themselves. It was in their blood, and nothing excites them more
than the sight of men-at-arms. (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 5)
In other discussion, the Peasant class does not entirely consist of a
group of farmers. Oftentimes, it consists of formerly dispatched Samurai who
had fallen into poverty and were living as a farmer as they continued to
struggle to find income. As explained through the theory of conflict, internal
and external conflicts happened during or after the war has formed a
deprivation of social status which is correlated to the concept of feudalism in
Japan during the Sengoku Era. Merchants, who are in the bottom of the class
tier, are oppressed to become traveling traders forever, without allowing their
single struggle to be overcome by the struggle itself. People who are classified
in Japanese society during the Sengoku Era were designated to stay in their
place. For instance, Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s childhood was not the lucky one,
unlike his lord Oda Nobunaga who came from a noble-born. He was looked
down upon as a farmer’s boy upon by multiple people, even his mother who
only wished that he would stay by her side until she sent him away to work
with new lords. In a sense that Samurais who are on the lower tier of the
Warrior class are most likely to be prune to lose their authority as a warrior.
The warring states era which involves war between clans constantly makes
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
35
the Peasant class suffer through their constant need for foot-soldiers from
battle to battle. As if they are brought up to the Warrior class then later
discarded back to their peasantry after they had lost their ability to become a
warrior. The existence of Kinoshita Yaemon, Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s father, is
a perfect example of an unfortunate condition of an injured foot-soldier which
was deprived into a Peasant class. The excerpt below is an explanation of a
situation where Kinoshita Yaemon, a foot soldier, was injured and ended up
bringing his whole family into poverty.
There were only the children, Hiyoshi, six, and his nine-year-old sister,
Otsumi—neither, of course, old enough to do any real work. Her
husband, wounded in battle, was capable of nothing but sitting by the
hearth and staring into the space beneath the hanging teakettle, even in
summer when there was no fire. Those things... I'd feel better if they were
burned, she thought. Leaning against a wall of the shed was a spear with
a black oak shaft, above which hung a foot-soldier's helmet and what
seemed to be part of an old suit of armor. In the days when her husband
had gone off to battle, this equipment has been the best he had. It was
now covered with soot and, like her husband, useless. Every time she
looked at she felt nothing but disgust. The thought of war made her
shudder (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 9)
The case of a Samurai family tumbling down into poverty is also shown
through the fate of Horio Tanomo who previously served Oda Nobunaga’s
father, Nobuhide and died in battlefield leaving his son and his wife living in
poverty at the middle of the mountains nearby Inabayama Castle where
Hideyoshi happens to stumble upon during his expedition. The novel
describes how the house which Tanomo’s son and wife live in was nothing
more than a peasant’s house, and terribly run-down. Tanomo’s son, Mosuke
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
36
along with his mother had to scrape out a living by hunting in the winter and
making charcoal.
The Japanese wealth is counted through rice brussels which are the core
produce which provides the living of the society during this time; it’s equal as
an amount of money. During the feudal era, feudal lords or Daimyōs control
each of their domains which often causes wars as do each feudal lords. This
control of land that is conducted by each feudal lord is not interpreted as
slavery, yet it is an exchange of freedom on a land. What caused the peasants
to suffer in this era is most likely the external conflict between feudal lords
who continuously fought for power over each other.
This is a key point of when the first conflict arose. With the famine which
arose amongst the peasants and lack of aid from their lords, The peasant along
with a Samurai from Sasaki clan had planned an uprising with the support of
troops from the Kannoji Castle and the warrior-monks in order to take down
the power of Nobunanga by taking advantage of the internal chaos of the fight
between the Oda clan with Asai clan, a clan who was lead by Oda
Nobunaga’s brother-in-law, Asai Nagamasa.
Nobunaga had been thinking about his brother-in-law's punishment ever
since his return to Kyoto. A secret report had been handed to Nobunaga in
the dead of night. It informed him that Sasaki Rokkaku had fomented a
peasant uprising with the support of Kannonji Castle and the warrior-
monks. Taking advantage of the chaos and acting in concert with the Asai,
Rokkaku was aiming to crush Nobunaga with a single blow (Yoshikawa,
2001, p. 457).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
37
As seen above, the peasant uprising wasn’t taking long as Nobunaga’s
troops had pointed to wiping off the rebellion act by destroying the defense of
Asai Nagamasa and the Sasaki clan who guarded the troops. Nobunaga
manages to defeat his enemies and eventually put the peasant uprising into the
end. The role of Nobunaga as the Warrior class in this novel drives a
significant point that in feudal government, there needs to be an establishment
of power of which party is stronger than another. Although the establishment
power doesn’t always sits right in the eyes of the lower class, the peasant
uprising done by the previous enemies of the Oda clan is a form of protest to
the shogun on how they are firmly disappointed by the power which
Nobunaga had infamously grew in the country.
2. The War between the Daimyō and the Samurai of Mount Hiei
That Sengoku Era or the era of Warring states marks the beginning of the
re-unification across Japan can also be interpreted as to put a unified power or a
more fixed government across Japan between all classes. During the time,
Sōhei or warrior monks were a powerful group who are also on the side with
the Peasant class by representing Buddhism as their core value of life. The
influence of the warrior monks was not always seen as keen in the Warrior
class, due to their loyalty to their temple and their power over the peasant class.
The warrior-monks of the feudal era are particularly a different section of the
feudal social chart. They can be either good or bad for the Warrior class itself.
Sampled below is a view of the warrior-monks in the eyes of the Warrior class.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
38
Hideyoshi cocked his head to one side and said, "Well, now. It is not the
Takeda of kai, who are always lying in wait at your rear, or the Asai or
Asakura clan. Lord Ieyasu is someone to be careful of, but he's an
intelligent man and so shouldn't be feared altogether. The Matsunaga and
Miyoshi are like flies, and there are plenty of rotting things for them to
swarm around, as it's their nature to go after the dying. Your only really
troublesome enemies are the warrior-monks of the Honganji, but they don't
trouble my lord much yet, I think. That only leaves one person."
(Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 465)
As to Hideyoshi’s note in discussion with Oda Nobunaga above, the
warrior-monks were the troublesome enemies, although their existence were
not as troublesome as the shogun, the leading role of the Warrior class and the
direct descendants of the Ashikaga Shogunate.
"He's neither an enemy nor ally. You have to show him respect, but if that's
all you do, you might quickly become trapped. He's a two-faced
apparition—oh, dear, I've spoken improperly. Aren't we talking about the
shogun?"
"Right. But don't mention this to anyone." Nobunaga's anxiety was about
this man, who was indeed truly neither friend nor foe: Yoshiaki, the
shogun. (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 465)
In dismay, why was the Shogun, the leading head of the Warrior class had
also shown an immerse threat upon Oda Nobunaga? The real answer is of
course on the duplicity and yet difference which exists between Oda Nobunaga
and Ashikaga Yoshiaki.
Duplicity is always found hidden away in places where one would least
imagine it to be. Yoshiaki’s and Nobunaga's characters were not matched
at all; their educations were different, so were their beliefs. As long as
Nobunaga had helped him, Yoshiaki treated Nobunaga as a benefactor. But
once he had warmed the shogun's seat a little, his gratitude turned to
loathing
"The bumpkin is annoying," Yoshiaki was heard to say. He began to avoid
Nobunaga, and even regarded him as a stumbling block, whose authority
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
39
exceeded his own. He was not, however, brave enough to bring matters out
into the open and fight him. Yoshiaki's nature was completely negative.
And, opposed to Nobunaga's positiveness, it played itself out in secrecy to
the very end. (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 466).
Throughout their relationship described above, Yoshiaki had claimed how
he finds Nobunaga as an annoyance and had even claimed him as a stumbling
rock. Yoshiaki had converse with the emissary from the warrior-monks of the
Honganji, a temple in Kyoto in a bitter expression of Nobunaga, claiming him
as arrogant and high-handed. Following their two impressions of each other,
Nobunaga had been waiting on a meeting on the same day to Yoshiaki’s arrival
in the capital as told from the citation below.
On the very same day, in another part of the palace, Nobunaga was waiting
for Yoshiaki in order to announce his arrival in the capital. Yoshiaki
composed himself, assumed an air of complete innocence, and went into
the reception room to meet with Nobunaga. "I hear that the battle of the
Ane River was a splendid victory for you. Yet another example of your
military prowess. Congratulations! This is a happy event indeed."
(Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 466)
On the other hand, the Peasant class plots a revolution with the help of
warrior monks to take down Nobunaga’s army in Mount Hiei. This is where the
climax of the story took place. Mount Hiei is an important landmark which
affects the political shift between Nobunaga and Yoshiaki.
Mount Hiei was the headquarters of the Tendai sect; the Honganji was the
principal stronghold of the Ikko sect. Each called the other "the other sect"
in matters of doctrine, and it was only in their opposition to Nobunaga that
they were united. If Nobunaga had not had a moment's rest, it was because
of the schemes of the men dressed in monks' robes, living on Mount Hiei.
They had plotted with the Asai and Asakura clans and the shogun, helped
enemies defeated by Nobunaga, sent secret calls for assistance as far as
Echigo and Kai, and even incited peasant revolts in Owari. (Yoshikawa,
2001, p. 493).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
40
The importance of Mount Hiei around this time was due to the stronghold
of religious power in Japan and a place where the large influence of the
warrior-monks spread across the country. For Nobunaga, the rise of movement
aided by the warrior-monks is his biggest threat as it involves the previously
defeated enemies of him and the peasants who disguised themselves in monk-
robes claiming to be warriors who essentially fought for their belief, Ikko-Ikki.
Thus, naming them the Ikko sect. The warrior-monks play a key role in the
conflict as they are not only troublesome enemies but also, they had been a
group who had appealed the most to the lower class. The Samurai of the Ikko
sect were the one who attacked Oda clan on the way to Kyoto.
That evening, accompanied by a few retainers and a force of only three
hundred men, Nobunaga followed the pathless valleys and ravines and
rode all night toward Kuchikidani. They were attacked countless times by
the warrior-monks of the Ikko sect and local bandits, and for two days and
nights they went without food or drink, or sleep (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 449).
By definition, the belief of Ikko-Ikki itself has been seen as problematic in
the eyes of the Warrior class, especially to Nobunaga. Their beliefs were easily
spread as they have massive influence on the citizens of Mount Hiei.
Ikko means single minded or devoted and the followers of this sect (called
monto) were fanatical in their worship of Amida the supreme Buddha who
they believed would welcome followers into paradise on their death.
Despite this being of the Jodo sect they welcomed all and did not insist on
any meditation or any other intellectual path to salvation, which also
appealed to the masses. The monks of this sect were also not required to be
celibate or become withdrawn from the material world so were able to mix
with the peasants more easily. Ikki means league but can also mean mob or
riot and it was through rioting mobs that the Samurai first became aware of
the sect (Dugdale Pointon, 2005).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
41
Finding out the involvement of the Shogun with the warrior-monks,
Nobunaga is convinced to take down the warrior-monks of Mount Hiei. At the
same time, the Shogun along with the warrior-monks along with the men under
them despised Nobunaga’s power; in fact, this is the reason why many people
are determined to put down Nobunaga. Nobunaga himself was famously known
for his ambitions as proven by his crowning achievements to overtake most of
his opponents. The same goes to the men who are under his lordship. The
reason why many men disliked Nobunaga was also caused by the widespread
uprising amongst the peasant was caused by rumors of Nobunaga’s malicious
propaganda.
Nobunaga had anticipated that they would ally themselves with the
Miyoshi clan, and that the weak shogun would be seduced to their side. He
had also expected that malicious propaganda would be spread among the
common people, and that this would most likely set off a popular uprising
against him. (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 468)
The war itself finally ended in the climax of the war between Nobunaga
and the allies of the warrior-monks helped by men from Asai and Asakura
clans. When Nobunaga had defeated the clans along with the peasant uprisings,
he had known that he needed to do more than defeating his enemies. Thus the
idea of the siege had arose, he had realized that Mount Hiei itself had become a
barrier for the rebellion to hide. When his enemies had retreated to Mount Hiei,
Nobunaga was personally insulted. He remembered how Mount Hiei had built
its first temple. The temple itself was a symbol for serenity of the Buddha with
His protection. To Nobunaga, he had seen it differently.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
42
When the Tendai sect had been introduced to Japan from China, Saint
Dengyo, who built the first temple on Mount Hiei, had chanted, "May the
light of the merciful Buddha give its divine protection to the timbers that
we raise up in this place." Was the lamp of the Law lit on this holy peak so
that the monks could force their petitions on the Emperor in Kyoto? Was it
so that they could interfere with the government and grow ever more
powerful with special privileges? Was it so they could ally themselves with
warlords, conspire with laymen, and throw the country into confusion?
Was the lamp lit so that the Law of Buddha might be accoutered with
armor and helmet, and line the entire mountain with warriors' spears, guns,
and war banners? (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 473).
In the feudal system of 16th century Japan, there we no clear authority of
the figurehead, although the emperor has been put on top of the class tier, the
emperor had loosen his glory as the war between states runs throughout the
country. This is what Nobunaga thinks of the country. He had thought that the
country had grown stranded away from what they believe in.
Nobunaga looked at the towering mountain and thought, It's here. It's not
the mountain that is my enemy; it's the mountain's special privileges. He
saw it in a new light now. From ancient times, through the reigns of
successive emperors, how much had the tradition and special privileges of
the mountain troubled and pained the country's rulers and the common
people? Was there even the faintest glimmer of the real Buddha on the
mountain? (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 472)
Mount Hiei to Nobunaga was a fallacy towards Buddhism. To him, he had
seen how the Mount had gained a very significant privilege in the country by
bringing the name of Buddha to their war. Nobunaga was outraged when he
saw this act was supported by the Shogun himself, the ruler of the military
supremacy during the feudal era.
With the perception of Mouth Hiei in the country, it is possible that when
there is a situation changing in Mount Hiei, it would gather a lot of attention.
Thus,on the same day of the second wave of the war in Mount Hiei, Nobunaga
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
43
had ordered his men to surround the Mount Hiei, an unusual strategy for
Nobunaga, he settled an agreement through one of his retainers who is a friend
of the warrior-monk’s abbot, Ittetsu. The agreement was to convince the
opposing team to surrender to Nobunaga and the warrior-monks to return back
to their disciples by throwing away their weapons or Nobunaga would burn the
place to the ground. In Nobunaga’s strategy he sought the agreement as a
rational goal that can be solved through a less violence approach. Yet, this
agreement was never settled and the abbot had sent Ittetsu back. Knowing how
the settlement was ignored, Nobunaga had for see that violence needs to be
justified as a conduct of power. Therefore, their war later continued in the siege
of Mount Hiei, little-by-little Nobunaga’s men set fire to the main temple, and
let it spread across Mount Hiei. The warrior-monks were forced to work
frantically at night to keep the flames from spreading to other large temples.
When the sun came up, the warrior-monks were busy pulling up their defenses
against Nobunaga’s troops leading to the food and supply crisis.
In the twelfth month, the abbot who previously had mocked and disagreed
with surrender went down to Nobunaga’s camp and pleaded for peace.
Nobunaga wasn’t forgiving at this point and decapitated the man and told the
other men who were with him to return to their place with the head of the
abbot.
When Nobunaga appeared, he saw that it was Sonrin, the abbot who had
previously met with Ittetsu. He brought the message that, because the
views of the main temple had changed, he would like to plead for peace.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
44
Nobunaga refused. "What did you say to the envoy I sent before? Don't
you know what shame is?" Nobunaga drew his sword.
"This is an outrage!" the priest cried. He stood up and tottered sideways as
Nobunaga's sword flashed horizontally."Pick up his head and go back.
That's my answer!" (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 476)
His decision to decapitate the abbot was a form of resistance. In
Nobunaga’s idea, when he had settled a peace agreement, it would be a form of
a chance that the abbot might return to take him down as previously planned by
the abbot along with his men from Asai and Asakura clans. He soon sent a
letter to the Shogun despite Hideyoshi’s suspicion of the Shogun and the fact of
the relation between the Shogun and the Warrior-monks.
On the last note of the argument, the researcher would like to point out the
situation during Nobunaga’s military supremacy. Buddhism wasn’t the only
weapon which the warrior-monks of Mount Hiei used to persuade and
encourage rebellion of the peasants. The usage of Buddhism for horrendous
acts inflicted the anger of Nobunaga which sprouted out the idea of burning
down the entire mountain and its citizens. This idea wasn’t all agreed by
Nobunaga’s men however, Sakuma Nobumori, one of Nobunaga’s retainers
appears to have strongly disagreed with burning down the entire mountain as to
eliminate the warrior-monks who resided in Mount Hiei.
"You're being heartless, my lord. It's not that we don't understand, but
when you've given us an outrageous order—to burn down Mount Hiei, a
place respected for hundreds of years as holy ground dedicated to the peace
and preservation of the country—as your retainers—and precisely because
we are your retainers—there is all the more reason why we should not
obey you," Sakuma Nobumori said (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 492).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
45
In Nobumori’s argument, he judged the decision of his own Daimyō. He
thinks the idea was an entirely outrageous order to the holy ground. But
Nobunaga disputed the argument, he reputed that the act of the warrior-monks
is Mount Hiei and a misuse of the common people. This form of action can be
seen as a rational negotiation between Nobumori and Nobunaga in order to
handle the situation of Mount Hiei.
"Have you not felt indignation when you watched the insurrections and this
disgraceful state of affairs? Monks transgress the Laws of the Buddha, stir
up the common people, store wealth and weapons, and spread rumors;
under the guise of religion, they are nothing more than self-serving
agitators." (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 492)
Nobunaga questions the face of Buddha from the warrior-monks. He had
seen the act of anti-Buddhism in warrior-monks. Nobunaga continued in his
argument with Nobumori that the monks themselves had used the donated
money to build stone walls and gates to benefit a fortress and hoard guns and
spears for their own sake, to make matters worse, the monks had flaunt their
wealth by eating meat and taking part in sexual intercourses. These facts were
not disputed by Nobumori and the other retainers; it was true that the monks
had done worse and far from the teaching of Buddhism. With no one else brave
enough to argue with Nobunaga’s order to burn the entire mountain; they had
decided to end the war between the Oda clan and the warrior-monks along with
the peasants by the siege of Mount Hiei through force. Nobunaga himself had
counted and considered how his actions would be frowned upon by the entire
Japan yet, he is willing to take any risks that come at hand, at least, to him, by
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
46
eliminating the strongest party, he established himself to the whole country as a
man who burned down the holy land.
3. The Conflict between Oda Nobunaga and Shogun Yoshiaki
As previously quoted in Lewis Coser’s theory of conflict, every conflict
has its start and varies, most importantly, how it effects to the society. In this
section of the thesis, the researcher will discuss the further effect of the conflict
that lasted in the siege of Mount Hiei.
When the Oda clan arrived in the capital after burning down Mount Hiei,
Nobunaga was seen as the demon king who had destroyed Buddhism. On the
other hand, with the defeat of Mount Hiei’s warrior-monks along with the Asai
and Asakura clan , the Shogun had nothing else to defend himself. For a while,
he had proclaimed that he was not scared of Nobunaga and he was considerably
confident as a shogun. Little to his knowledge, Nobunaga had seen the errors
which the shogun had made, he had encouraged a rebellion and disrupted the
peace of the country, an opposite action of the duty of a Shogun.
"Shogun Yoshiaki is a crafty politician. He fidgets about, bestowing favors
on the people, and indirectly makes them fear you. He's made good
propaganda out of the burning of Mount Hiei, and seems to be inciting
other religious groups to rebellion." (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 525)
In discussion with his lord, Hideyoshi points out the error of the Shogun
and expresses his concern which Nobunaga agreed with. Nobunaga himself had
notices how the shogun took advantage of the peasant uprising and the power
of the warrior-monks as a set of weapon and abuses his status as a military
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
47
supremacy to overtake the power of the Oda clan instead of giving a more
proper counter argument against Nobunaga’s action to Mount Hiei.
“More than that, he's taking a rather extravagant view of the remaining
powers of the shogunate. In a period of transition, a cataclysm separates
past and future. Almost all of those who perish are those who, because of
their blind attachment to the past, fail to realize that the world has
changed." (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 526)
Hideyoshi had also mentioned how there is a period of change that is
beginning to happen in the country. He views the shogun’s action as an act of
denial of the war which he had lost to. The shogun failed to realize how his
encouragement and unethical actions towards the peasant uprising and the
warrior-monks was not a rightful decision to create a unification of a country.
From the hypothesis which Hideyoshi claimed in his discussion with
Nobunaga, it was seen that the feudal system in Japan had shown more
controlled authorities by eliminating the warring states into two strong
strongholds, The Oda clan and the Shogun.
B. The Impact of the Conflict towards the Feudal System in Japan
From the start of the feudal era, Shogun is an important role and a
powerful influence as a military supremacy. It seemed logical that he was easy
to persuade people and create propaganda to justify that Oda Nobunaga himself
was a true enemy of the country. The impact of the conflict that happened
preciously is the downfall of the Shogun’s authority and the rising of
Nobunaga’s supremacy.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
48
The key point of the fall back of the Shogun was also marked by the death
of the Shingen, a Daimyō of the Kai province who is more respected compared
to the Shogun himself.
For many years Shingen had assumed he was the best warrior in eastern
Japan. Certainly, the efficiency of his troops and of his province's economy
and administration were respected by the whole country (Yoshikawa,
2001, p. 482).
Based on the level of respect he received from the country, it was no doubt
that he was a powerful opponent for Nobunaga, yet they ever had even fought
against each other as his province was busy fighting against the neighboring
province, Echigo led by a well-known Samurai named Uesugi Kenshin. The
battle itself had taken a large number of resources and by the time he had to
fight against Nobunaga, the warrior-monks who had supposed to assist his
troops from Mount Hiei had been defeated by Nobunaga. The Shingen later on
had a war to Mikawa, Tokugawa Ieyasu’s province. It was widely known that
Tokugawa Ieyasu was close to Nobunaga and thus the existence of the power
from the Shigen was also a big threat to Nobunaga.
Like all of Nobunaga’s opponents who have been defeated, Shingen took a
side with the Shogun and assisted to take down Nobunaga. In a fortunate
circumstance to Nobunaga’s favor, the Shingen was shot dead before he
reached Kyoto and the message of his death was eventually brought by one of
Oda’s alliance, Watanabe Tenzo who purposefully spied on the Shingen
beforehand. Although, according to the history there are only speculations and
very little information about the existence of the ninja called ‘Watanabe Tenzo’
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
49
(written: 渡辺天蔵 in Kanji), the character of Watanabe Tenzo definitely
brings a very prominent result to the story progression. Watanabe Tenzo’s role
during the time as Toyotomi Hideyoshi’s agent was enough to ensure
Nobunaga that the death of Shingen and the military supremacy had finally
bestowed upon their hands.
For a moment, Nobunaga's eyes widened and he looked straight at
Hideyoshi's face. If it was true that Shingen was dead, the course of the
nation was going to change very quickly. Nobunaga felt as though the tiger
at his back had suddenly disappeared, and he was shocked. He wanted to
believe this story, but at the same time he could not. As soon as he heard
the news, he felt an incredible surge of relief, and an indescribable joy
welled up inside of him.
"If this is true, a very gifted general has left this world," Nobunaga said.
"And from now on history has been entrusted into our hands." His
expression was not nearly as complex as Hideyoshi's. In fact, he looked as
though he had just been served the main course at a meal. (Yoshikawa,
2001, p. 526)
With the relief on Nobunaga’s side, he could finally establish a more
political focus upon the country. Nobunaga was also confident about the future
of the country. As his opponents are decreasing and his political influence
became more known in the country, Nobunaga along with his retainers didn’t
take a long time to decide to take on the Shogun’s troops and overtake the
capital, ending the warring states and putting his military supremacy to unify
the country.
The unification of Japan itself began with the concept of a new form of
feudalism. In discussion of the previous events reflection on feudalism before
Oda Nobunaga supremacy was far from unification of a country. After the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
50
death of Shingen and the fall back of the current shogun, Ashikaga Yoshiaki
mentioned his delay on the reply for the seventeen articles regarding his fault as
a shogun.
These men had a big problem: they had not yet given a clear answer to the
seventeen-article document that Nobunaga had sent to Yoshiaki on New
Year's Day. In it, Nobunaga had itemized all his grievances against
Yoshiaki. (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 531)
In the citation above, ‘These men’ referring to the people under the
Shogun’s watchful eyes were having troubles facing Nobunaga’s army.
Nobunaga has made Shogun Ashikaga Yoshiaki to fall straight into his trap, by
providing him his faults as a politician accompanied by Yoshiaki’s ignorance
of his faults, claiming that he was in fact still the Shogun and assuming
submitting to nonentity such as Nobunaga unnecessary. It was clear such a
politician denies his fault and holds on his own ludicrous illusion that he wasn’t
about to fall is a sign that he was in fact on the fact of his own ruin.
As in regards to the Shogun’s men, they were incapable of not knowing
their own value as a warrior. What had appeared in the Japanese culture during
this era was their narrow view of their own culture which only surrounds the
capital and believed that it prevailed more rather than viewing the common
sense of the culture in each prefecture. The sad truth of the situation in this era,
according to the novel, clan warriors entrusting themselves to cramped policies
of the past, relied on warrior-monks of the Honganji and other Samurai
warlords throughout the provinces who hated Nobunaga to survive the war
against Nobunaga. Thus, when their time had come to an end, they’re worried.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
51
When Nobunaga’s army had arrived in Osaka to vent of the warrior-monks of
the Honganji, he had also sent an envoy to pressure the response of the
seventeen articles regarding Yoshiaki’s administration.
"We can strike anytime we like," he said. At this point he wanted most
strongly to avoid any unnecessary expenditure of military strength. And,
until this time, he had repeatedly sent envoys to Kyoto asking for a
response to the Seventeen Articles. So, this was a sort of ultimatum.
Yoshiaki took a highhanded view: he was shogun and he simply did not
feel like listening to Nobunaga's opinions of his administration.
(Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 532)
In ignorance of Nobunaga’s power in the country, Yoshiaki still taken his
status as a Shogun as a defense from the seventeen articles which had been
presented, amongst them, there are two articles which pressured him further,
one is his crime of disloyalty towards the emperor and the second one
regarding his disgraceful conduct by initiating rebellion from the provinces,
thus providing a riot and disrupting the peace of the country.
When Nobunaga retreated from Osaka to come to Kyoto, the Shogun
thinks it was a victory on his side. To his surprise, Nobunaga had arrived in
Kyoto to pressure him further about the seventeen articles. Yoshiaki was
flabbergasted; he was clueless of Nobunaga’s arrival along with his army. In
the absence of war cry and gunshots, Nobunaga waited for the response.
Yoshiaki consoles his Mibuchi Yamato, his senior advisor. Yamato himself
realized that the era had changed and started to question his Shogun’s authority.
He views that the Shogun himself was blinded by his own authority and
seemingly believed that Yoshiaki is not worth saving. Despite that, he did not
choose to take side with Nobunaga, he had lived long, and he had passed fifty
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
52
years old when he decided to give Yoshiaki a choice whether he will fight
against Nobunaga or sue for peace. Helpless on his own, Yoshiaki sued for
peace to Nobunaga. Only a hundred days later, Yoshiaki returns back to his old
habits, knowing that Nobunaga would take his head eventually, Yoshiaki
escaped the capital to entrenched himself in Uji, a small city between Kyoto
and Nara. When Nobunaga finally caught the Shogun, it was clear that the
Ashikaga Shogunate had met its end. Begging himself to be killed by
Nobunaga, Yoshiaki had made a fool of himself by agreeing to take
Nobunaga’s offer to go to exile. He was stripped down out of his status, no
matter where he ran to, he had lost the respect from the people around him.
Not wanting to play host to a bothersome, defeated aristocrat, however,
Yoshitsugu soon made him feel uneasy, saying, "I think you're going to be
in danger if you stay here much longer. Nobunaga could change his mind
at the slightest provocation and have your head cut off." Yoshiaki left in a
hurry and went to Kii, where he tried to incite the warrior monks of
Kumano and Saiga to rebel, promising them grandiose favors in return for
striking Nobunaga down. Using the name and dignity of his office, he did
nothing more than bring down upon himself the derision and laughter of
the people. It was rumored that he did not stay long in Kii, but soon
crossed into Bizen and became a dependent of the Ukita clan. (Yoshikawa,
2001, p. 537)
Having no military head, Nobunaga started to take his influence as a military
supremacy. With the exile of the shogun, a new era has started. In the new era,
Nobunaga has taken his focus upon the unification of the country. Yet, his
struggle with the other Warrior class especially was not the end.
The eyes of the people were opened wide at Nobunaga's actions. But even
though they looked up at the deep blue sky, all the thick clouds had not yet
dispersed. Nobody could guess what would happen next. During the past
two or three years several key men had passed away. Two years before
both Mori Motonari, the lord of the largest domain in western Japan, and
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
53
Hojo Ujiyasu, then master of eastern Japan, had died. But for Nobunaga
these events did not carry nearly as great a significance as the death of
Takeda Shingen and the exile of Yoshiaki. To Nobunaga, it was especially
the death of Shingen—who had constantly threatened him from the
north—that left him free to concentrate his strength in one direction, a
direction that made more fighting and chaos almost inevitable. There was
certainly no doubt that, after the demise of the shogunate, the warrior clans
in every province would raise their banners and compete to be the first to
enter the field. (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 538)
After Nobunaga managed to put the previous shogun into exile with the
spread of, the entire country knows that the position of a new shogun has just
opened up. The Warrior class in the feudal era had raced to the position, by that
means, they have to fight against Nobunaga and for those who are in alliance
with Nobunaga take their advantage to show their power by securing their
territories. This includes the Tokugawa clan.
In the plot of the story with the accordance of the history, Nobunaga did
not take the part of becoming the shogun, instead he was busy on a war with
the Takeda clan in Nagashino, along with his ally, Tokugawa Ieyasu in order to
defeat all of his rivals to create a new revolutionary era. After winning the war
of Nagashino, Nobunaga devised a plan with Hideyoshi to initiate a hunt of
weaponry amongst the Peasant class to eliminate the potential of rebellion and
the rising of warrior-monks.
In momentary bliss, Nobunaga settled down in Nijo Castle, a place where
the Shogun used to live. With the downfall of Takeda Shingen’s clan, the
emperor appointed Nobunaga to be the court rank of Councillor, making him
the General of Right. By his status, he finally established a new headquarters in
Azuchi Castle, as a start of a new beginning to conquer Japan.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
54
After studying the foolishness of the shoguns, Nobunaga did not even
consider setting up a government in Kyoto. That had been the old state of
affairs. Azuchi was closer to his ideal: from there he could guard against
the provinces to the west as well as check the advances of Uesugi Kenshin
from the north. (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 610)
With his power finally established, Nobunaga had high plans, his initial
plan was to build a castle to establish the new form of government. Through the
citation below, the new establishment of the castle was organized not only to
impress other Daimyōs yet also a well-planned establishment both for the
people and to Nobunaga’s convenience. The castle was built close to the
capital thus making it easier for Nobunaga to oversee other lords, in this sense,
his current foes, the Uesugi clan from north, Takeda clan from east and Mori
clan from west which previously had their own respective feuds towards
Nobunaga’s alliances and including Nobunaga himself.
Nobunaga, it seemed, had already designed the structure and scale of the
castle in his head. He drew a line with his finger. "It's going to stretch from
here to here. We'll build a town around the castle at the bottom of the
mountain, with a quarter for the merchants that will be better organized
than in any other province in Japan," he said. "I'm going to devote all the
resources I have to this castle. I've got to have something here imposing
enough to overawe all the other lords. It won't be extravagant, but it's going
to be a castle that will have no equal in the Empire. My castle will combine
beauty, function, and dignity.” (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 610)
With the involvement of the craftsmen and construction workers across
Japan, the construction of Azuchi castle started. Amongst all, a famous artist,
Kano Eitoku stands out to illustrate the doors, sliding partitions and ceilings as
a form of light towards the world of Japanese traditional arts after years of
decline due to the civil war. This is the one mark of the rising of the Japanese
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
55
identity in a cultural sense. As written in W.G. Beasley’s book about The Rise
of Modern Japan, that the Feudalism in Japan after time to time was to be found
with sufficient identity and analogy in all of its leading features to make the
coincidence striking. Azuchi castle is not just a form of a physical military
supremacy. Azuchi castle was built not in entirely Japanese style, it was a
mixture of Japanese, South Barbarian and Chinese. To him, as quoted in his
speech towards the Uesugi Kenshin’s old-fashioned letter of challenge.
“All of the changes in weaponry and strategy in the last decade have
brought us into a new world. How could anyone say the art of war hasn't
changed too? He's probably laughing at my retreat as cowardice, but I can't
help laughing at the fact that his outdated thinking is inferior to that of my
artisans and craftsmen.” (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 619).
In his words, Nobunaga argued that it was unnecessary to conduct civil
war. He continued that time had changed and there should be change in both
politics and the culture in society itself yet the message did not sit well to other
parties, thus making periods of civil war continues on, even throughout the
history, Nobunaga along with his trusted retainer, Toyotomi Hideyoshi had
taken their main focus upon a more diplomatic matters through social
influences with other lords in their alliances. The Mori clan however, did just
the same as they have an extended influence over twenty provinces.
Unfortunately, Nobunaga has never finally achieved the goal he wanted,
his clan had fallen apart as seven years during their cold-war against Mori clan,
and by a coincidence or for reasons of military expediency, one of Nobunaga’s
generals, Araki Murashige, betrayed his lord and joined the enemy camp,
raising the banner of rebellion right at Oda’s feet (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 662).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
56
The one who noticed the rebellion was Hideyoshi, he knew if he had told
Nobunaga, he would be furious as Nobunaga himself had taken much
recognition upon Murashige’s valor. In order to console, Hideyoshi had thought
about telling Nobunaga his acknowledgement upon the sudden rebellion to
Ranmaru.
"There were rumors about this sort of thing before," Ranmaru said. "The
story goes that one of Lord Murashige's retainers was selling army rice to
the warrior monks of the Honganji. There's a shortage of rice in Osaka.
The land road has been cut for the most part, and the sea routes have been
blockaded by our fleet, so there is not even the prospect of transporting
provisions with the Mori's warships. The price of rice has gone way up,
and if a man sells rice there, he can make an immense profit. That's just
what Lord Murashige's retainer did, and when the affair was exposed, Lord
Murashige took the initiative and unfurled the flag of rebellion, fearing that
he would be questioned about this crime by Lord Nobunaga anyway."
(Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 679)
Ranmaru analyzed that the reason why Murashige ran to revolt and declare
rebellion was because of the economical affair which he had with the enemy,
although this rumor once disregarded by Ranmaru and Hideyoshi, Nobunaga
believed that it was true. However, Murashige was not the only one who in
later story would go against Nobunaga and started a rebellion.
In 1582, Akechi Mitsuhide, one of Nobunaga’s trusted generals decided to
take a decision to go against him.
While he had been in Sakamoto, he had wavered: Should he go ahead with
the plan or scrap it? But this morning, when he heard the second report, his
hair had suddenly stood on end. In his heart he had resolved that the time
was now, and that heaven had sent him this opportunity. Nobunaga,
accompanied by only forty or fifty lightly armed men, was staying at the
Honno Temple in Kyoto. The demon that possessed Mitsuhide whispered
to him that it was a unique opportunity (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 850).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
57
As told in the quotation above, the rebellion of Mitsuhide was rather not
planned before; he only seeks the opportunity where his lord is in his weak
position. The core reason of why he did so is debatable, yet in most likely that
throughout the novel, Mitsuhide was treated badly by Nobunaga although he
had responded to him out of respect multiple times.
In all of his fifty-four years, Mitsuhide had never relied on his own wisdom
the way he was doing now. Although objectively he would have had every
reason to doubt his own judgment, subjectively he felt exactly the opposite.
I haven't made the smallest mistake, Mitsuhide said to himself: No one
could suspect what's on my mind (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 850)
In quotation above, it is shown how Mitsuhide has been no more than loyal
to his lord, but he himself doubted the plan itself. When Mitsuhide is
encountered by his cousin in his future plans, he claimed that he had gone over
how Nobunaga treated him, most importantly how Nobunaga treated the
previous incidents. These thoughts he discussed with his cousin are what made
him feel assured to betray his lord.
"Nobunaga rose against the shogun. And everyone knows how much bad
karma accumulated from burning down Mount Hiei. Look what befell his
senior retainers-Hayashi, Sakuma, Araki. I cannot think of their tragic fates
as other people's affairs." (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 861).
To his quote, he is aware that Nobunaga’s position in the current feudal
system yet Mitsuhide couldn’t help but pity the enemies which Nobunaga had
taken down especially the tragedy which happened in Mount Hiei. He
eventually gave out his grudge and went to raid against Nobunaga in an
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
58
unexpected way. Mitsuhide’s rebellion was recorded as ‘The Honno-ji Incident’
(World, 2017).
As Nobunaga’s supremacy rose in the capital, he began to send his
generals across Japan in an expansionist campaign to overtake the entire Japan
including Mitsuhide who were sent to aid Hideyoshi to Takamatsu castle. It
was around the celebration of the defeat of Takeda clan when Mitsuhide took it
upon himself to take his troops to Honno castle and attack Nobunaga in his
usual resting place in Kyoto. Eventually, the castle was burned down to ashes,
taking Nobunaga’s corpse along with it. However, Nobunaga did not die from
the attack, and more so, he took it upon himself to commit seppuku after
realizing that the situation had become dire. The death of Nobunaga is a form
of retreat which he would not submit to Mitsuhide’s troops.
C. The Effect of the Conflict towards Current Society
In this section of the Thesis, the searcher discussed how the conflict itself
depicted by the writer of the novel gave effect on the current era and the
relevance of this novel’s conflict to the real world.
No one knew me as he did, Hideyoshi thought. In his last moments in the
flames of the Honno Temple, he must have called out to me in his heart
and left me with a trust. Insignificant as I am, I am not going to turn my
back on my lord and his trust in me. Thus, Hideyoshi made a pledge to
himself. It was not a vain lamentation. His belief was simple: just before
Nobunaga had died, he had left Hideyoshi with his dying instructions.
(Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 908)
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
59
As shown in the quotation above, although the death of Nobunaga had
passed, his legacy continues on in the hands of Toyotomi Hideyoshi who
continued his conquest to conquer Japan starting from continuing what his
lord had planned for the future of Japan.
Hideyoshi gave his final instructions to his retainers in Himeji Castle:
"Victory and defeat are in the hands of fate, but if I should be struck down
by Mitsuhide, set fire to the castle and make sure nothing remains. We
have to act bravely, following the example of the man who died at the
Honno Temple." (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 930)
In the quotation above, it proves that Hideyoshi did not just take upon
himself to plan to finish off Mitsuhide after what he had done to his Lord. His
form action to take revenge over Mitsuhide is a form of loyalty he had
persuaded over the years with Nobunaga.
The skills Hideyoshi had shown in the invasion of the western provinces
over the last five years had taught many of Nobunaga's other generals his
true value. Among those men were Niwa Nagahide, Nakagawa Sebei,
Takayama Ukon, and Ikeda Shonyu. They perceived Hideyoshi's loyalty
under such long adversity as unswerving devotion to their former lord
(Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 931)
Hideyoshi’s loyalty to his lord amazed other lords. He was liked by many
lords due to this fact, thus gaining him support amongst the Warrior class.
Around the same time with Hideyoshi’s plan to take revenge on Mitsuhide,
Mitsuhide himself gained popularity amongst the previous opponent of
Nobunaga. Hideyoshi who in the previous year before Nobunaga’s death had
managed to settle a peace agreement with the Mori clan focuses his view onto
the redefinition of the class system in Japan.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
60
Toyotomi Hideyoshi, in the legacy of Oda Nobunaga redefined the social
class through his actions on building the large Osaka castle as a center of
unified Japan, continuing to retract weaponry in the Peasant class, including
swords and the last of them had been the influence of religion in Japan during
the feudal era. Hideyoshi concerns about the country being divided into three
spheres of influence and how it might transform back to warring states.
Nobunaga was dead, Mitsuhide was dead, and there was the possibility that
the country would once again be divided into three spheres of influence, as
it had been before Nobunaga. Worse, family feuds and rival warlords
defending their own local interests might plunge the country into the chaos
of the last years of the shogunate. (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 968)
From the citation, the situation after Nobunaga and Mitsuhide had passed
on was more disheartening. Without anyone left to take the throne as a
military head, it has become a concern upon who will lead the country. In
later years, Hideyoshi was the one who took the job to spread his influence
and put feudal lords on their respectful places by establishing their military
power against other Samurai clans, making Toyotomi Hideyoshi as the
military head for a while, ending his status due to his death in 1598 and
putting Tokugawa Ieyasu to continue his legacy to conquer entire Japan.
The impact of the warring states takes many efforts to digest. However, the
researcher would like to stop by the quote below from epilogue as a sign of a
Daimyō who finally able to solidify the peace across Japan. Even if
Hideyoshi had lost over Ieyasu due to his background, it was rather a more
political exchange that gained Hideyoshi a title of Kampaku or government
official as shown below.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
61
In the Tenth Month of the fourteenth year of Tensho, Hideyoshi and Ieyasu
met in Osaka Castle for a historic peace conference. Undefeated in the field,
Ieyasu nevertheless ceded the political victory to Hideyoshi. Two years
before, Ieyasu had sent his son as a hostage to Osaka, and now he took
Hideyoshi's sister as his bride. The patient Ieyasu would wait for his
chance—perhaps the bird would yet sing for him (Yoshikawa, 2001, p.
1256).
With many declines in both Cultural and Political aspects, Tokugawa
Ieyasu had many duties he must attend to after winning the national
hegemony by a victory over the lords of west Japan and become the Shogun,
making the Tokugawa clan as the heap of military supremacy. Over the
course of history, the Tokugawa clan successfully restored and maintained
law and order, including making policy to the administration of rural districts,
supervising finances and archives to service as attendants and messengers.
Unfortunately, with nothing left to fight for, many Samurais had taken their
duty as only garrison duties, which became a common complaint among
reformers that there were more jobs than work (Beasley, 1940, pp. 3-7). In the
same argument, the researcher agreed with W.G. Beasley presented upon
discussion of the Tokugawa legacy. There was a classic belief that the
Tokugawa society is one of the fixed stratifications: a descending hierarchy of
the Warrior class, farmer, artisan and merchant, yet, in reality this is
misleading. The most likely meaning of social stagnation which had been
executed by Hideyoshi is the existence of important distinctions between the
Warrior class and the rest. The Warrior class, though they’re left in charge of
governing their own prefectures was never involved in the day-to-day
management of agriculture, in fact this had become a proof to their economic
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
62
standing which often occurs on how the Japanese government runs its
political system.
As previously discussed in the description of the theory, this is where
Lewis Coser’s theory of conflict applied and X.J. Kennedy’s Historical
approach would also come into discussion. That in reflection of the historical
correlation between the novel’s conflict with the current socio-political
situation in Japan, the researcher analyzes the possibility of the cases that
happened in the 16th century as a reflection of modern-era Japan, the
indication as being the start of a revolution in a government system
throughout the history.
Mentioning the current society issues as described in the situation of
Japan, the researcher would like to look back to Taiko’s conflict of social
stagnation. As per quoted in X.J. Kennedy’s Historical approach, the work of
a literary work is seeking to understand literary work with a necessity of an
author’s milieu. In the case of Eiji Yoshikawa’s Taiko, this work was
originally made in the early 20th century before the translation that surfaced in
2001 (People Pill, 2020), thus the reflection of settings and the description of
era used in this novel is a part of the perception that the author has in his era.
The researcher believes that while this epic novel is not a complete accurate
representation of the 16th century Japan, it is necessary to see the facts that
had arose in the 16th century Japan had some similarities in the historical
records as discussed in the previous chapter. Thus, in this section, the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
63
researcher observed the effect of the conflict happened in history to the
current state of socio-political system in Japan especially the era shift that
recently happened in 2019.
While the era of warring states has ended, there are fair points on why the
current Japanese social system has shown a stagnated diagram ever since the
era of Tokugawa. Without ignoring the fact that the era had changed and there
were neither more duties of the Samurais nor an existence of a shogun in
today’s era. The Japanese social system shows staggering similarities to their
feudal system which had seemed to take a peek upon today’s sociological
issues. As explained through Sugimoto’s book An Introduction to Japanese
Society, the main goal of Japan’s democracy is to preserve the cultural
essence which have been developed since the early times. On the contrary,
this is exactly what Prime Minister Shinzo Abe had tried to achieve. By
reviving the spirit of the prewar period in which the highest constitution is
held by the emperor, his eventual plan is to show the glories of the emperor
by establishing a political standing. Without forgetting the achievement that
Shinzo Abe had brought to Japan, it is shown that his cause did not produce
significant support as it fails to resolve many problems which happened in the
country as many reported issues, such as issues with hikikomori are estimated
to keep increasing.
With the shrinking economy, low birth issues and an increase of elderly
deaths, Japan is in threat of losing more of their population, which means that
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
64
less population, less workers in the country. With fewer workers, more people
are exposed to Karoshi. These issues can also lead to more decrease of their
economy. To add more, the people who are in the lower class, such as the
working class are starting to lose faith in their government. This is a worrying
reality which needs to be issued before more damage is done.
The start of the conflict is embedded in the society’s view of the
government that reflects the general observations and reactions it had
produced by uninterested parties below the government class. If in feudal
Japan the authority of power is held by the shogun from the Warrior class
with the absence of unity of the country and a divide of authority between the
Shogun and Oda Clan. In the current era, the authority power is hold by the
government class with an absence of support from sixty percent of the
working class. In projection of Coser’s theory of conflict, the researcher can
say that the entitlement of government system can be seen as a structure that
function in a country, that is to produce a significant power that greatly
impacted both sides of the structure itself. In picturesque that in order to
govern, same with the power relation theory, both sides must be able to
support each other at ease. Along with knowing that logically it is impossible
to get a hundred percent optimism of the government system, the government
must at least win the heart of their people to decrease the absence of support.
Looking back to the conflict of the novel about the unification of Japan as
a whole country, the researcher would like to point out a key point of
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
65
relevance which counterpoints the attempt to return the constitution of Japan
to perceived glories of the prewar period. The researcher also ought to be
reminded by how the Japanese society runs as a collective and hierarchal
society, in which they appreciate the meaning of unification as a concept of
their lives. Not to mention about their belief in their philosophical concept of
Ningen Kankei as mentioned in Pratama’s observation. Through the conflict
which occurred in the past eras, it supposed to have become clear that there
are many flaws upon achieving the spirit of the past, even when the social
system had been stagnated for so long, it became apparent that the reflection
of a role which a warrior have can also be a lesson to the government, that in
their own ways of reflecting their duties needs to be a devotion that could at
least decrease and aid the situation of the people, instead of momentary
producing more ideas that did not fix major issues.
What had seemed to be a trouble for the country is the separation between
two sectors, the government and the people under their defying care As
mentioned by W.G. Beasley’s discussion about the role of the Warrior class:
the Warrior class are lacking in their involvement on a day-to-day basis in
their agriculture which causes a large misunderstanding between two sectors.
Which are also reflected through the current era? As quoted by the Guardian
on April 1, 2019, “Japanese society is no longer controlled by an emperor,”
Hiroshi Kozen, an emeritus professor of Chinese literature at Kyoto
University, told Kyodo. “The era system should reflect people’s desires, and
that should start with a discussion about why we need it,” (Guardian, 2019).
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
66
With the support of the change of era, compiled with numerous problems
that had face upon the Japanese society and the faith towards the government
which plummet, it has become relevant that the government, including Prime
minister, Shinzo Abe to start focusing their change towards sociological
issues and conducting more aid to social workers who had devote themselves
into helping other people in their country. This means abandoning the idea of
changing the political system to the past and start producing new ideas to fix
their views of democracy that can fit into the current era and are more
relevant than preserving the traditional ways.
The past events of the conflict between the Warrior class depicted from
Eiji Yoshikawa’s Taiko has a fair point to why the government should be
focusing more on their people’s needs and abandoning concepts which had
been deemed irrelevant. Nobunaga and Hideyoshi both agreed that running a
country needs a level of agreement between the people and the government.
Especially in an era of transition, which Hideyoshi argued that people who
kept being blind of their attachment to the past are threatened to be perished
by the flow of time.
Furthermore, to the argument, the researcher took a look upon Nobunaga’s
influence on the feudal system to Tokugawa as a part of discussion of the
current socio-political situation. While in Taiko itself, the role of Tokugawa
seemed to be shadowing behind the glories of Oda Nobunaga and Toyotomi
Hideyoshi rather than influential, it is during the Tokugawa Shogunate or the
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
67
Edo era that the current socio-political belief feels closer to. This is
correlating the situation of the Japanese feudal system during the Edo era
which is heavily influenced by the previous era. With the growing and
stability of the economy during the Tokugawa era, it has become a remarkable
achievement in Japan. But this is solely due to the rise of the Shogunate as a
political leader. While there is very little involvement ofthe emperor in their
political development. Which means, the emperor would recede even more
into the background as his position of the emperor has become almost a
formality (McReynolds, 1952, p. 109)
The idea of amae and enryo can also be implemented to the general
problem of the Japanese customs which resulted in many social problems
listed in the previous sub chapter. As seek in the reaction of the Japanese
people over the burn down of Mount Hiei, the researcher could say that it is
their way of society works. Not only that people in Japan are accustomed by a
collective manner but also a Hierarchal idea of living that translates to high
value appreciation of the holy land. For instance, the Japanese idea of privacy
is only deprived through these two ideas. In the Japanese word itself, there is
no direct translation of the word ‘privacy’. The thought process of a working
ethics and handling daily socialization in Japan is mostly conducted through a
high emphasis on group mentality which can be taken in a positive and
negative way. To further elaborate, the consciousness of the Japanese people
who are victims of the Karoshi are majorly caused by the mentality that
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
68
working overtime is considered as a good thing in the society. The reason of
Karoshi is mostly because of the Japanese society’s uniformed system.
This means that the more people appreciate the consideration of working
overtime produce a significant view of the entire society, while the effects of
this mentality is also perceived differently in the working class, what it could
prove is that there is a line of ambivalent feelings that arose amongst the
working class towards working overtime. These ambivalent feeling that arose
amongst the working class is not entirely new concept. In fact, according to
the novel, the feeling of ambivalent appears around the Samurai class due to
questioning their loyalty in their lords.
The general spread out some documents on the floor and opened the
conference by explaining them in outline. He had written a report on the
military and economic power of the Oda clan. "It's said to be a small clan,
but recently it would seem that its economy has rallied remarkably." As he
spoke, he showed diagrams to Yoshimoto. "Owari is said to be a united
province, but within its eastern and southern sections there are places, like
Iwakura Castle, which owe their allegiance to you, my lord. Additionally,
there are men who, although they are Oda retainers, are known to feel
ambivalendy about their loyalties. Thus, under the present circumstances,
the possessions of the Oda clan are less than one-half, possibly only two-
fifths, of all of Owari." (Yoshikawa, 2001, p. 255)
This different perspective can also be the cause of hikikomori or NEET
which are frowned upon in society. That is to say that the group mentality had
produced a negative impact as hikikomori or NEET are refusing to do the
same thing as the people around their environment, their actions to become
shut-ins are also an indication to the society that they have not produced a
cooperativeness and an ability to communicate with others and therefore their
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
69
existence is counted as a part of predicament to the society, supported by the
decline of the Japanese population itself.
The right to privacy, understood as “the individual’s right to control the
circulation of information concerning him or her", is considered a shameful
excess of mistrust in relation both to a cooperative society and to those
who collect, store, share, and use personal data. Consequently, the sense of
a right to privacy is foreign and less important to Japanese society than it is
in Western societies (Yohko, 2006).
In elaboration of the discussion, the social-political structure of the
Japanese democracy system may also be an interpretation of an interpretation
that lasted through decades. This is shown through the similarities of the
feudal system conducted in the 16th century and the current system. The only
differences that are apparent are the roles that are standing by the social status
itself. The existence of the Warrior class can be interpreted the same as the
government. The lack of action in Shogun Yoshiaki shows similarities with
the lack of action that the current prime minister towards the issues with
Karoshi, Hikikomori, Kodokushi and the lack of birth in Japan while the
action of the Daimyo to unify the country once again have also shown
similarities with the action that Tokyo Governor, Yuriko Koike to protect
Japan from the current issues.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
70
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION
In this chapter, the researcher would like to state some results that could be
derived from the analysis done in the previous chapter. The results will further
point out the signs of change in authority in feudal Japan through the conflict
in the Warrior class, the significance of Nobunaga’s influence that rose in the
country and the impact it brings to the current society as the readers of Taiko.
This thesis elaborates the points that were found above. The feudal system
of 16th century of Japan begins with the chaos of authority in the warrior
class.That is not only by the chaos which occurred between states all over
Japan but also a rise of warrior-monks. Nobunaga who is a strong believer of
the emperor’s grace had seen the lack of prevention of the warring states from
the Shogun’s behalf. Instead he saw the support that warrior-monks get from
the Shogun when they decided to further prolong the war by causing troubles
with the Oda clan. As a result, Nobunaga raged upon the existence of the
warrior-monks and burn down their holy land, Mount Hiei.
The fall of Mount Hiei sparked more conflict but it also indicates an
establishment of power and the fall of the Shogun. The fall of the Shogun
shuffle the feudal system entirely. The 16th century feudal system which
originally headed by the emperor as a culture symbol continued to Shogun
was turned into the emperor continued by the Daimyō . With the change and
the effect, it brings to the complete shift of authority; it became apparent that
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
71
Nobunaga’s influence is impactful towards the society during the time. Even
when he passed, his actions have constructed a new system that leads to the
final unification done by his loyal alliance, Tokugawa Ieyasu.
Issues such as: Hikikomori, Karoshi, Kudokushi and Low-birth rate in
Japan has sought the eyes of the current society over decades. Unfortunately,
with these issues rule out, the Japanese Prime minister has not shown much of
initiative while governors of each district are forced to take matters to their
own hands to save their people. Tokyo Governor, Yuriko Koike was left
deeply frustrated by the fact that the Prime Minister shown verily lack of
actions towards this issue. The political conflict between Prime Minister and
the Governor has shown the similarities between the conflict which sparked
between Shogun and the Daimyo.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
72
REFERENCES
Aizawa, Y. (2019). Japanese losing their trust for politics. Retrieved from
https://www3.nhk.or.jp/nhkworld/en/news/backstories/777/
Allan, D. K. (2006). Lewis Coser: The Functional Consequences of Conflict. In
The Social Lens (pp. 213-216). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications
Inc.
BBC. (2019). Naruhito: Japan's new emperor pledges to be symbol of unity.
Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-48101637
Beasley, W. (1940). The Modern History Of Japan . London: Andesite Press .
Cartwright, M. (2019). Samurai: Definition. Retrieved from
https://www.ancient.eu/Samurai/
Cartwright, M. (2019). Sengoku Period - Ancient History. Retrieved from
https://www.ancient.eu/Sengoku_Period/
Center, E.-W. (2019). Governement response to low fertility in Japan. Retrieved
from
https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/events/pdf/expert/24/
Policy_Briefs/PB_Japan.pdf
Chronicles, L. a. (2007). Feudal Japan. Retrieved from
http://www.legendsandchronicles.com/ancient-civilizations/feudal-japan/
Demetriou, D. (2020). Employees in the country whose brutal office culture has
led to several deaths are beginning to rethink the tradition. Retrieved from
BBC: https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20200114-how-the-japanese-
are-putting-an-end-to-death-from-overwork
Dugdale Pointon, T. (2005). Ikko-Ikki. Retrieved from articles/weapons_ikko.html
Felluga, D. (2002). Introductory Guide to Critical Theory. Retrieved from
"Modules on Foucault: On Power." :
http://www.purdue.edu/guidetotheory/newhistoricism/modules/foucaultpo
wer.htm
Fleming, G. (2018). What is Conflict in literature. Retrieved from Thoughtco:
https://www.thoughtco.com/conflict-in-literature-1857640
Giorando, C. (2019). Independent.co.uk. Retrieved from
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/japan-birth-rate-record-
low-child-population-pregnancy-ageing-a8952116.html
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
73
Gossman, L. (1994). History and the Study of Literature. Profession. Retrieved
from www.jstor.org/stable/25595522
Guardian. (2019). Reiwa: How Japan's new era is breaking new tradition.
Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/apr/01/reiwa-
how-japans-new-era-name-is-breaking-tradition
Hall, J. W., & Jansen, M. B. (1968). Studies in the Institutional History of Early
Modern Japan. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Horner, F. J. (1948). A case of History of Japan. London: Sheed and Ward Ltd.
Kennedy, X., & Gioia, D. (1995). Literature: An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry,
Drama, and Writing Sixth Edition.
Kip Wheeler, L. D. (2018). Feudalism. Retrieved from
https://web.cn.edu/kwheeler/feudalism.html
Lewis, L. (2019). Misery of Japanese workplace shows few signs of lifting.
Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/a2289d48-d944-11e9-9c26-
419d783e10e8
MasterClass. (2019). What Is Conflict in Literature? 6 Different Types of Literary
Conflict and How to Create Conflict In Writing. Retrieved from
https://www.masterclass.com/articles/what-is-conflict-in-literature-6-
different-types-of-literary-conflict-and-how-to-create-conflict-in-
writing#quiz-0
McReynolds, C. (1952). China, Japan and the powers. USA: The Ronald Press
Company.
Miyake, K. (2019). What does Reiwa really mean to Japanese? Retrieved from
https://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2019/04/08/commentary/japan-
commentary/reiwa-really-mean-japanese
Neely, C. (2016). japanindustrynews.com. Retrieved from
https://www.japanindustrynews.com/2016/06/japanese-political-system/
Nippon.com. (2019). Record 1.46 million Foreign workers in Japan. Retrieved
from https://www.nippon.com/en/japan-data/h00382/record-1-46-million-
foreign-workers-in-japan.html
People Pill. (2020). People Pill. Retrieved from https://peoplepill.com/people/eiji-
yoshikawa-2/
Ray, M. (2019). Reiwa Period | Definition, History & Meaning. Retrieved from
https://www.britannica.com/event/Reiwa-period
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI
74
Reischauer, E. O. (1974). Japan: The Story of a Nation. New York: Alfred A.
Knopf,Inc.
Sposato, W. (2019). Shinzo Abe Can't afford to Rest on His Laurels. Retrieved
from https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/12/24/japan-shinzo-abe-2020-prime-
minister-rest-laurels/
Sugimoto, Y. (2010). An Introduction to Japanese Society Third Edition. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Szcezpanski, K. (2019). A Brief History of Japan’s Daimyō Lords. Retrieved from
https://www.thoughtco.com/a-brief-history-japans-Daimyō-lords-195308
Szczepanski, K. (2019). The Four-Tiered Class System of feudal Japan. Retrieved
from https://www.thoughtco.com/four-tiered-class-system-feudal-japan-
195582
Toyoda, T. (1957). THE CHARACTER OF THE FEUDAL SOCIETY IN JAPAN
(I). Retrieved from The Annals of the Hitotsubashi Academy:
http://www.jstor.org/stable/43751357
World, S. (2017). The Honno-ji Incident (June 21, 1582). Retrieved from Samurai
World: https://Samurai-world.com/the-honno-ji-incident/
Yohko, O. (2006). Privacy Protection in Japan: Cultural Influence on the
Universal value. Retrieved from
http://www.isc.meiji.ac.jp/~ethicj/Privacy%20protection%20in%20Japan.p
df
Yoshikawa, E. (2001). Taiko. Tokyo: Kodansha.
PLAGIAT MERUPAKAN TINDAKAN TIDAK TERPUJI