136
THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF THE MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY SAMIRA DANESHKADEH IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN BUILDING SCIENCE IN ARCHITECTURE AUGUST 2013

THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    15

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON

THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

A THESIS SUBMITTED TO

THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES

OF

THE MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY

BY

SAMIRA DANESHKADEH

IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS

FOR

THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE

IN

BUILDING SCIENCE

IN

ARCHITECTURE

AUGUST 2013

Page 2: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS
Page 3: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

Approval of the Thesis:

THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON

THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

Submitted by SAMIRA DANESHKADEH in partial fulfillment of the requirements for

the degree of Master of Science in Building Science in Department of Architecture,

Middle East Technical University by,

Prof. Dr. Canan Özgen _____________________

Dean, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Güven Arif Sargın _____________________

Head of Department, Architecture

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Soofia Tahira Elias-Ozkan _____________________

Supervisor, Architecture Dept., METU

Examining Committee Members

Prof. Dr. Ömür. Bakırer _____________________

Architecture Dept., METU

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Soofia Tahira Elias-Ozkan _____________________

Architecture Dept., METU

Dr. Ayşegül Tereci _____________________

Architecture Dept., METU

Inst. Francoise Summers _____________________

Architecture Dept., METU

Assoc. Prof. Dr. A. Yağmur Toprakli _____________________

Architecture Dept., Gazi University

Date: 04/09/2013

Page 4: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

iv

I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and

presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare

that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all

material and results that are not original to this work.

Name, Last name: Samira Daneshkadeh

Signature : ________________

Page 5: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

v

ABSTRACT

THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON

THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

Daneshkadeh, Samira

M.Sc., Building Science, Department of Architecture

Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Soofia Tahira Elias-Ozkan

August 2013, 122 Pages

Human comfort and satisfaction are of utmost importance that should be considered in

design of a buildings. Providing occupants with high level of comfort is notably affected

by thermal performance of building. In the case of invalid thermal behavior, health,

productivity and performance of occupants will be affected negatively. Therefore, in this

study it is intended to find out that if double skin facades are fundamental factors in

thermal performance of the buildings or not. The study will concentrate on thermal

behavior of the space within the double skin façade. Moreover, it discusses the

disadvantages of non- ventilated double skin façade cavity.

In this research, the south façade of Akman Medicorium Health Center in Ankara were

investigated. Accordingly, the investigation was done through collecting temperature and

relative humidity data by data loggers in cavity of south- east and south- west façade, the

atrium and exterior. It is indicated that, the glass type in the façade of the building does

not prevent inside to become hot through letting direct sunlight in to the building.

Therefore, in order to decrease high heating loads of interior space, central cooling can be

utilized in the building. It is recommended to apply ventilated double skin façade to the

building which contributes to the thermal comfort of the space.

Keywords: Human Comfort, Thermal Performance, Double Skin Façade, Relative

Humidity, Cavity, Central Cooling, Non- Ventilated DSF, Ventilated DSF.

Page 6: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

vi

ÖZ

ÇİFT KABUKLU CEPHELERİN BİNALARIN

TERMAL PERFORMANSİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Daneshkadeh, Samia

Yüksek Lisans, Yapı Bilimleri, Mimarlık Bölümü

Tez Yöneticisi: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Soofia Tahira Elias-Ozkan

Ağustos 2013, 122 Sayfa

Binaların tasarımında insan konforu ve tatmini dikkate alınması gereken önemli

hususlardır. Bina sakinlerinin konforunun en iyi şekilde sağlanabilmesi binanın termal

performansının seviyesine bağlıdır. Yetersiz temal oluşum, sağlik ve üretkenliği olumsuz

yönde etkilemektedir. Dolayısı ile, bu çalısmanın amacı çift kabuk cephelerinın binaların

termal performansı üzerindeki termal etkilerinin araştırılmasıdır. Bu çalışma, çift kabuk

cephelerinin arasındaki boşluğun termal davranışı üzerinde yoğunlaşmaktadır. Ayrıca

çift kabuk cephelerinde havalandırılmış hava koridorunun dezavantajlarını da

tartışmaktadır.

Bu araştırmada; Ankara’da bulunan Akman Medicorium sağlik merkezinin güney

cephesı çalışılmıştşr. Bu çalışma, sıcaklık ve bağıl nem verilerinin güney-doğu ve güney-

batı cepheleri, atrium ve diş ortamdan veri kaydedicisine toplanması vasıtası ile

yapılmıştır. Bu çalışmada, bina cephesinde kulanılan cam türünün, iceriye direk olarak

giren güneş ışığının sebep olduğu ısınmayı engellemediği gözlenmiğtir. Dolayısı ile,

kapalı alanda oluşan yüksek ısının azaltılması icin binada merkezi soğutma kulanılabilir.

Kapalı alandaki termal konfora katkıda bulunması amacı ile havalandırılmış çift kabuk

cephe uygulanması tavsiye edilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: İnsan konforu, Termal performans, çift kabuk cephe, Sıcaklık, Bağıl

nem, Hava koridoru, Merkezi soğutma, Havalandırılmış ÇKC, Havalandırılmamış ÇKC.

Page 7: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

vii

To my parents and my lovely sister Salva

Page 8: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

viii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to thank my supervisor Assoc. Prof. Dr. Soofia Tahira Elias-Ozkan for her

endless supports, guidance and patience throughout this study.

I would like to present my appreciation to Asst. Prof. Dr. Yağmur Topraklı and Hacer

Ergin for their help and contribution in my thesis.

I would like to express my special thanks to my father, Hossein Daneshkadeh and my

mother Parvin Ghalichebaf for their constant encouragement, kindness, sacrifice and

supports in every stage of my education.

I would like to thank my kind and lovely sister, Salva who is so supportive in whatever I

do in my life.

I am also deeply grateful to my friends, Kıvılcım Obakan, Erdinç Kayıkçı for their

enormous motivation, affection and supports.

Page 9: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

ix

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT...................................................................................................................... v

ÖZ………………. ........................................................................................................... vi

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................................. viii

TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................. ix

LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................... xi

LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................ xii

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ........................................................................................ xiv

CHAPTERS

1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1

1.1 Argument .............................................................................................. 1

1.2 Objective ............................................................................................... 2

1.3 Methodology ......................................................................................... 2

1.4 Disposition ............................................................................................ 2

2 LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................. 5

2.1 Double Skin facades ............................................................................. 5

2.2 Goals of double skin facades ................................................................ 6

2.3 Classification of double skin facades .................................................... 7

2.3.1 Non-ventilated double skin facade ............................................................... 8

2.3.2 Ventilated double skin façade ...................................................................... 9

2.4 Thermal performance of double skin façade ....................................... 14

2.4.1 Quality of indoor space .............................................................................. 15

2.4.2 Solar heat gain and loss .............................................................................. 16

2.4.3 Natural ventilation and double skin façade ................................................ 18

2.4.4 Mechanical ventilation and HVAC systems............................................... 19

Page 10: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

x

3 MATERIALS AND METHODS ............................................................... 23

3.1 Materials ............................................................................................. 23

3.1.1 Case study building .................................................................................... 23

3.1.2 Data loggers ................................................................................................ 36

3.1.3 Weather data for Ankara ............................................................................ 37

3.2 Method ................................................................................................ 39

3.2.1 Data collection ............................................................................................ 39

3.2.2 Data evaluation ........................................................................................... 48

4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION................................................................. 49

4.1 Temperature data................................................................................. 49

4.1.1 Temperature comparison for hottest days .................................................. 52

4.1.2 Temperature comparison for coolest days .................................................. 56

4.2 Humidity data ...................................................................................... 59

4.3 Features of space and glass in relation to the results .......................... 64

5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ....................................... 65

REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 67

APPENDICES

A TEMPERATURE DATA FOR THREE HOTEST DAYE......................................... 71

B TEMPERATURE DATA FOR THREE COOLEST DAYS ...................................... 87

C HUMIDITY DATA FOR THREE HOTTEST DAYS ............................................. 103

D TEMPERATURE DATA COMPARISON GRAPH FOR THREE HOTTEST DAY

(WITHOUT DL01) ....................................................................................................... 119

E HUMIDITY DATA COMPARISON GRAPH FOR THREE HOTTEST DAYS

(WITHOUT DL01) ....................................................................................................... 121

Page 11: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

xi

LIST OF TABLES

TABLES

Table 2.1 Classification of double skin façade systems .......................................... 8

Table 3.1 Properties of laminated security glass ................................................... 33

Table 3.2 SHGC and U- value of laminated glass................................................. 34

Table 3.3 Features of selected locations for data collection .................................. 36

Table 3.4 locations of Data loggers ....................................................................... 41

Table 4.1 The minimum and maximum temperature values recorded by data

loggers and sensors for selected 3 days ................................................................. 51

Table 4.2 The maximum humidity values recorded by data loggers for selected

three days ............................................................................................................... 59

Table A Temperature data for three hottest days………………………………...72

Table B Temprature data for three coolest days…………………………………88

Table C Humidity data for three hottest days…………………………………..104

Page 12: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

xii

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURES

Figure 2.1 Typical double skin façade .................................................................... 7

Figure 2.2 Buffer type façade ................................................................................. 9

Figure 2.3 The box type window .......................................................................... 11

Figure 2.4 The multistory double skin façade ...................................................... 11

Figure 2.5 The corridor type façade ...................................................................... 12

Figure 2.6 The shaft-box ventilated double skin façade ...................................... 14

Figure 2.7 Insulating the Building Envelope- Recommended R-values............... 15

Figure 2.8 Heat transfer through single skin glazing ............................................ 17

Figure 2.9 Heat transfer through single skin glazing ............................................ 18

Figure 3.1 Akman Condominium Business Center- Medicorium Center............. 24

Figure 3.2 Entrance of Akman Condominium Business Center- Medicorium

Center .................................................................................................................... 24

Figure 3.3Top view from Akman Medicorium health center ............................... 25

Figure 3.4 Site plan of Medicorium Center .......................................................... 26

Figure 3.5 The plan of medicorium center............................................................ 27

Figure 3.6 Section from Akman Medicorium health center ................................. 28

Figure 3.7 Grills location at south façade of the building ..................................... 29

Figure 3.8 Grills location in south façade of Medicorium health center .............. 30

Figure 3.9 Grills location in rooms of Akman Medicorium health center............ 31

Figure 3.10 The South facade of Akman Medicorium Center .............................. 32

Figure 3.11 The entrance and south facade of Akman Medicorium Center ......... 32

Figure 3.12 The interior view from south facade of Akman Medicorium Center 35

Figure 3.13 Onset HOBO U12 data logger ........................................................... 37

Figure 3.14 Temperature chart for Ankara (14 May 2013 to 23 July 2013) ........ 38

Figure 3.15 Data loggers’ location on the plan ..................................................... 40

Figure 3.16 Data logger DL 01- South.East facade .............................................. 42

Page 13: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

xiii

Figure 3.17 Data logger DL 07- South.West facade ............................................. 43

Figure 3.18 Data logger DL 09- Atrium ................................................................ 44

Figure 3.19 Data logger DL 11- Fire exit .............................................................. 45

Figure 3.20 Data logger DL 15- South.East facade............................................... 46

Figure 3.21 Data logger DL 16- South.West façade ............................................. 47

Figure 4.1 Temperature data collected from the exterior (DL11) ......................... 50

Figure 4.2 Temperature data comparison for hottest days from 30 May to 1 June

2013 ....................................................................................................................... 55

Figure 4.3 Temperature data comparison for coolest days from 30 May to 1 June

2013 ....................................................................................................................... 58

Figure 4.4 relative humidity data collected from the exterior location (DL11) .... 60

Figure 4.5 Humidity data comparison for hottest days from 8 June to 10 June

2013 ....................................................................................................................... 63

Figure D Temprature data comparision graph for three hottes days…………...120

Figure E Humidity data comparision graph for three hottest days……………..122

Page 14: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

xiv

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

DSF Double Skin Façade

BBRI Belgian Building Research Institute

HVAC Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning

VDF Ventilated Double Skin Façade

DL Data Logger

SHGC Solar Heat Gain Coefficiency

Page 15: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

This study will consider the impact of double skin facades on thermal performance of

buildings. In this chapter background information, problem, aim and objective

accompanied by contribution will be presented.

1.1 Argument

The environmental impacts of buildings and the demand of applying new facade

technologies in architecture have increased considerably in the last few years. Double

skin facades started to be applied in many tall buildings since they can provide energy

efficient design. These types of facades originated in European countries because of their

awareness in ecological and environmental fields together with climatical comfort

subjects. The rapid growth of double skin facades dates back to 1970’s which is called as

“oil crisis era”. Double skin facades are commonly used in high rise buildings as they can

provide opportunities such as thermal comfort, sound insulation and energy consumption.

The idea of a building envelope which can adapt to internal and external environment is

not new. The improvement in utilizing glass in skin of the buildings resulted in the

evolution in the design of double skin facades; thus in 19 centuries architectures were

provided to come up with new design in building exterior by development of greenhouse

construction and skeleton frame.

This study will consider the impact of double skin facades on thermal performance of the

buildings since it is believed that double skin facades can be described as one of the

remarkable factors which play a role in sufficient thermal performance of buildings.

The problem addressed by this study is poor thermal comfort in buildings which have a

potential of resulting in excessive heat gain and loss during seasons since architects

generally do not realize the difference in the performance of the ventilated double skin

facades versus the non- ventilated double skin facades. As a result most buildings are

seemed to have a fixed non- ventilated external skin.

Page 16: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

2

1.2 Objective

Most percent of heat losses and gains happen through the glass in buildings’ facades;

thus, total glass surface is a significant factor in affecting the thermal behavior of the

building. Therefore, the fundamental aim of this study it is to find out whether double

skin facades are substantial elements in thermal performance of buildings or not. As a

result this study will survey the impact of double skin facades on thermal behavior of the

space within the DSF and its impact on the building energy loads and the drawback of a

non- ventilated DSF cavity.

As a result the objective of the study will be presented through investigating the air

condition system of the indoor space in Akman Medicorium Center on the basis of

temperature.

1.3 Methodology

The study focused on double skin facades effect on thermal behavior of building which

was carried out on Akman Medicorium Center. As a result in order for evaluation,

thermal data in the spaces between south- east and south- west DSF, the atrium and

external were collected for investigation.

In this study firstly, the temperature and relative humidity were recorded at 15 minute

intervals in selected four spaces of the building through data loggers. These data were

collected during the hottest season from 14 May 2013 until 23 July 2013.

Secondly, the raw data were downloaded to the computer from the data loggers and were

imported to the Excel software. As a result, the data could be reached both in tabular and

graphical forms. Thus, the overall obtained data examined and analyzed. Afterwards, the

comparison was made between collected data from building and relevant standards at

hand.

1.4 Disposition

The thesis is presented in five chapters:

The first chapter describes the topic of the thesis consisted of the problem statement and

aims of study accompanied by procedure of the research namely overall methodology.

In the second chapter the literature review will be described. In this chapter general

description of double skin facades will be presented consisted of their history and

Page 17: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

3

systems. Afterwards, goals of utilizing double skin facades and their classification will be

discussed. Finally, thermal performance of double skin facades will be described

including information about solar heat gain/loss and natural and mechanical ventilation

through double skin facades.

In the third chapter the materials which utilized in the study will be explained.

Afterwards, the case study building which is Akman Medicorium Center and data loggers

which were utilized for data collection are introduced. Moreover, Ankara weather data

which was obtained through http://www.eurometeo.com are also presented in this

chapter. At the end, the methodology of the study is described in detail.

In the fourth chapter evaluation of data is done by having graphs and tables at hand.

Therefore, discussions and outcomes of the study are presented in this part.

Finally, the fifth chapter will present the conclusions and recommendations.

Page 18: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

4

Page 19: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

5

CHAPTER 2

2 LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Double Skin facades

Andreotti (2001) states that “A building becomes a chameleon which adapts a properly

equipped and responsively clothed building would monitor all internal and external

variables, temperature, hygrometry and light levels, solar radiation and its internal

systems accordingly. It is too much to ask of a building to incorporate, in its fabric and its

nervous system, the very basic vestiges of an adaptive capability”.

Campogno (2002) describes the term double skin facades as “an arrangement with a glass

skin in front of the actual building façade. Solar control devices are placed in the cavity

between these two skins, which protects them from the influences of weather and air

pollution, a factor of particular importance in high-rise buildings or ones situated in the

vicinity of busy roads.”

Based on Aydin (2005) and Oestrele et al (2001) double skin facades have multilayer

principles which are composed of exterior skin, interior skin and intermediate space. He

states that in these types of facades weather protection and noise control is provided

through exterior layer. Moreover, the ventilation of the intermediate and interior space is

provided through openings which were installed to the skin; and solar induced thermal

buoyancy and wind effect leads airflow in intermediate space.

Streicher (2005) points out some of the characteristics of double skin facades as their

capability in providing buffer zone, wind and sound protection, energy consumption,

pollutant protection and appropriate heating/cooling systems.

According to Ismail and Salinas (2006) and Oesterle (2001) double skin facades date

back to utilizing box-type windows in most of European houses in order to increase

thermal insulation. Oesterle et al (2001) state 1903 as the appearance time of curtain

double skin wall in Steiff factory in Giengen, Germany. He mentions the attitudes of the

double skin façade in Steiff factory as its capability in macimizing daylight with regard to

high wind rate and cold weather of the Giengen. According to these studies double skin

facades provide us with approximately 25 percent reduction in amount of utilized energy

and external noise and natural ventilation not only in low- rise building but also in

multistory constructions. In addition , double skin facades are most commonly used in

tall buildings in order for providing natural ventilation because of lower pressure of the

Page 20: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

6

façade cavity and shading device protection because of extreme wind pressure apart

from aesthetic purposes.

2.2 Goals of double skin facades

According to Aronas (2000a and 2000b) double skin facades have five the main goals

which are discussed below.

a) Energy consumption and ecological responsibility: According to this study

reducing solar energy factor on envelope of the building will lead to energy

consumption. Therefore, reduced solar loads and low U- value will decrease the

loads of the building in respect. In addition double skin façade are considered as

their capability in saving natural resources, thus their priority in providing energy

consumption along building performance life.

b) Economical issues: Depending on this research applying double skin facades in

to the building will require higher cost in comparison to applying a conventional

façade despite the additional costs which differ between 20%- 30%. Aronas

states that in installation of double skin façade cost rate of the process should be

considered and compared along with advantageous and life-cycle basics of the

project while maintenance and operational costs also should be taken in to

account. However, decreasing the size of HVAC system will lead to reduction of

heating and cooling loads on building skin.

c) Natural ventilation: Based on Aronas study double skin facades are considered

as suitable solution for areas with high wind rate because of their capability in

providing buffering zone through placement of level of glass on exterior of the

operable glass. Of course, mechanical ventilation of the double skin façade is

demanded to be regarded as natural ventilation of double skin facades do not

seem to be efficient and desirable for the areas with hot climate.

d) Noise reduction: A database was developed to store essential information of

retrieved studies. It included information such as name of authors, name of

journals, country of origin, year of publish, employed research models, statistical

analysis methods and statistical analysis tools.

e) Safety: According to this study supplemental external layer of façade provides

security of the building by acting as physical obstacle. Moreover, additional skin

of façade provides windows to be opened in to the interior space which lead to

come up with more secure building compared to the buildings with directly

exposed glazings.

f) Aesthetics: Aronas implies that depth, layering and transparency attitude of

double skin facades provides architectures to come up with various and

alternative designs compared to buildings which stay as massive volume with

traditional brickwork façade

Page 21: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

7

Figure 2.1 Typical double skin façade (Source: Angus, 2001)

2.3 Classification of double skin facades

Belgian Building Research Institute- BBRI (2004) indicates that “A double skin façade

can be defined as a traditional single façade doubled inside or outside by a second,

essentially glazed façade. Each of these two facades is commonly called a skin”.

Page 22: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

8

Table 2.1 Classification of double skin façade systems (Source: Gelesz & Reith, 2011)

Ventilation mode Non- ventilated buffer

systems

Partly or fully ventilated

(naturally or mechanically)

Operation mode/

Construction type

Buffer zone

Outdoor air curtain

Indoor air curtain

Air supply

Air exhaust

Window type systems

Compound window

Box- type window

Double skin

facadess

Vertically

and

horizontally

partitioned

Buffer Facade

Box- type window

Horizontally

partitioned

Corridor facade

Multi- story

Multi- story facade

Mixed

partitioning

mode

_

Shaft- box type facade

2.3.1 Non-ventilated double skin facade

According to BBRI (2004) the intentional and possibly controlled ventilation of the

ventilated double façade is the main difference between a non- ventilated and ventilated

double kin façades, whether or not integrating a shading device in the cavity separating

the glazing.

Buffer façade: According to Pollard (2000) in this type of ventilation each of the

skins of double skin façade is airtight and therefore no ventilation of the cavity is

occurred, thus the cavity acts as a buffer zone between the inside and outside. In

addition, the cavity of buffer DSF mainly functions as insulation layer.

Page 23: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

9

Figure 2.2 Buffer type façade (Source: Berezovska, 2011)

2.3.2 Ventilated double skin façade

According to the research done by Loncour, Deyener and Wouters (2004) in ventilated

façade concepts ventilation of the cavity is controllable by means of fans, openings which

are the remarkable characteristic of Ventilated double skin facades (VDF). A ventilated

cavity- having a width can range from several centimeters to several meters- is located

between two skins. Automated equipment, such as devices, motorized openings or fans,

are often integrated into the façade.

Based on the Loncour, Deyener and Wouters (2004) the classification of ventilated

double skin facades are generally done according to the geometric shapes of facades

while their working modes are ignored. However, in this report the classification of

double skin facades will be considered depending on their working mode, including:

Ventilation type

Partitioning type of façade

Ventilation of the cavity

a) Ventilation type: According to the Loncour, Deyener and Wouters (2004) the

impelling pressure of ventilation of the cavity which is located between two

cover of glass is defined as type of ventilation, incuding:

(i) Natural ventilation: As Wong (2008) states fresh air for interior

spaces can be supplied by natural ventilation. In his point of view

number of factors that result in natural ventilation include: 1)

differences in temperature which lead to air changes 2) pressure

differences which lead to air movement or flow and 3) stack effect

which Berezovska (2011) describes it as the “movement of the air in

Page 24: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

10

to and out of buildings, chimneys, flue gas stacks, or other

containers, and is driven by buoyancy”; Of course, however air

movement which result from stack effect seems efficient in order for

cooling interior space by convection but in order to produce

demanded air movement, these forces do not seem too much

adequate for thermal comfort in hot places. In addition Berezovska

(2011) indicates that natural ventilation decreases the need for

mechanical ventilation, thus improve the environmentally friendly

ventilation and energy consumption.

(ii) Mechanical ventilation: According to Gruner (2012) refers to

Hegger (2008) mechanical ventilation systems concentrate on

improving efficiency of transported volume and scattering of the air

inside the system. Belgian Building Research Instituton (2004)

describes the mechanical ventilation as: “Ventilation with the aid of

powered air movement components”.

(iii) Hybrid ventilation: Based on the study by Eggers, Matthes,

Panaskova and Mukker (2009) hybrid ventilation system is the

combination of the integrated ventilation unit and automated glasses.

They state that in these systems motors which joined into window

frame help windows to be opened continuously. They also add that

mechanical ventilation system which is composed of controlled

compromise of both natural and mechanical ventilation.

Additionally, based on this study mechanical ventilation system can

both supply the fresh air and take it out from the interior space.

b) Partitioning type of cavity: Based on Alibaba and Ozdeniz (2011) multiple

skin facades are composed of two transparent surfaces which are partitioned by a

cavity and need for cooling during summer or heating during winter can be

decreased by utilizing additional skin. In their point of view these types of

facades can be classified depending on the arrangement of the cavity as it is

mentioned below.

(i) Box type window: According to Louver, Deyener and Wouter (2004) these

types of facades are divided into independent boxes through vertical and

horizontal partitioning. They state that these types of facades have special

frame that hold the glass pane which is called fish-mouth; therefore the

outside air which was built in the stories, is exhausted through fish- mouth.

Page 25: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

11

Figure 2.3 The box type window (Source: Berezovska, 2011)

(ii) The multistory DSF: Berezovska (2011) points out that multistory

ventilated double façades are composed of cavity which is not dived

horizontally nor often vertically; additionally these types of facades can take

advantage of stack effect which provides natural ventilation by installing

suitable openings. Based on this research chimney effect influences the use

of natural ventilation remarkably. The author adds that multistory double

skin facades sometimes equipped with HVAC systems; and atrium space can

be created through undivided space.

Figure 2.4 The multistory double skin façade (Source: Berezovska, 2011)

(iii) The corridor type DSF: According to Berezovska (2011) these types of

double skin facades are composed of spacious cavity which is partitioned at

each floor height horizontally and form corridors along the façade. The

Page 26: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

12

author states that in some types of double skin facades, story separating

elements are utilized for cleaning and maintenance purposes. Berezovska

emphasizes that cavity dividing decreases the overheating rate remarkably in

levels above; moreover, corridor facades provide natural ventilation of the

cavity without allowing hot air to move upward since they are equipped with

air intakes and outlet at each story.

Figure 2.5 The corridor type façade (Source: Berezovska, 2011)

(iv) The shaft- box DSF: Berezovska (2011) indicates that shaft-box ventilated

double skin facades are only applicable to the naturally ventilated facades

since the partition takes advantage of natural ventilation and increases the

stack effect. Berezovska adds that vertical shafts are installed among vertical

components of façade and thus through stack effect trapped warm air in

varied parts of façade can move upper to extract by outlets. In addition

Alibaba and ozdeniz (2011) state that the air space is divided vertically along

façade in shaft-box window; and box window are joined to tall ventilation

shaft on the façade. They also emphasize some of the disadvantages of shaft-

box facades including noise transmission and fire protection.

Page 27: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

13

Page 28: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

14

Figure 2.6 The shaft-box ventilated double skin façade (Source: Berezovska, 2011;

Oesterle, 2001)

c) Ventilation of the cavity: According to Raffnsoe (2007) windows and

ventilation are generally composed of individual systems; fresh air valves are

located in window frames while in airflow windows, the cavity which is located

among glass panes draw the fresh air before reaching interior space and cause

integration of window and ventilation systems. It is possible to identify five

ventilation modes in DSF. According to Louver, Deyener and Wouter (2004)

“The ventilation mode refers to the origin and the destination of the air

circulating in the ventilated cavity. The ventilation mode is independent of the

type of ventilation applied”. The author indicates the five ventilation modes,

including:

Outdoor air curtain

Indoor air curtain

Air supply

Air exhaust

Buffer zone

In addition, Coexistence of several ventilation modes in DSFs are also possible.

As Alessi (2008) states “ A number of ventilation modes can operate in an

existing double skin façade and natural ventilated system with the help of

motorized ventilation openings offers the most possibilities. These motorized

ventilations openings can switch from one ventilation mode to another and bring

the indoor comfort to an ideal level”.

2.4 Thermal performance of double skin façade

Based on the Heinberg et al (2007) energy efficient building envelope is composed of

thermal and air barrier elements. According to this study by installing suitable insulation

products, effective thermal barrier will be provided; otherwise installing inappropriate

insulation products will decrease energy performance of buildings nearly 30 percent;

therefore, in order to come up with energy efficient design layer of insulation materials

should be applied to the entire envelope.

According to EREC and NREL (2000) elements of energy efficient building are

composed of walls, roofs, windows, insulation, air/vapor retarders and caulking. The

study implies that the thermal envelope of the building attempts to protect indoor spaces

from the outside. Additionally, dependent upon this study amount of R-value is too high

in energy efficient buildings which described as ability of material that resists heat

transformation. For example, the low R-value will cause quick heat loss. Figure below

displays the amount of recommended R- values on building envelope:

Page 29: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

15

Figure 2.7 Insulating the Building Envelope- Recommended R-values

(Source:Heinberg 2007)

Depending on Ismail, Salinas and Henriquez (2008) approximately 90 percent of

radiation can be transferred through simple glass windows. The study explains that

amount of energy consumption can be remarkably decreased by taking advantage of new

strategies and technologies. Additionally the study implies that windows with solar

effective attributes are called thermally efficient windows since selective properties

inside glass results remarkable changes in transmission, reflection and absorption;

Therefore according to this research high performance glass can be achieved through

applying deposited films.

2.4.1 Quality of indoor space

According to Heinberg et al (2007) our living environment should not be considered

completely independent from outside world around. In this study some of the general

remarkable problems of our living environments including homes, office, Hospital and

etc are described as below:

Extreme heating and cooling bills

Page 30: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

16

High humid range

Excessive rate of fromaldehyde, radon and carbonmonxide

Therefore, Heinbergg et al (2007) states that in order to solve these kinds of problems it

is demanded to come up with a design in which the living space is appropriately able to

react to the interior and exterior environment; thus in order to reach this level of design

the house should be able to act excellent in humidity levels, fluctuating temperatures and

air pressures. Heinberg et al (2007) explains that the quality of the living environment

can be provided through keeping following factors in pleasant levels.

Moisture levels

Temperature

Air quality

Air movement

Structural integirity

2.4.2 Solar heat gain and loss

In this section the performance of double skin facades in hot and cold climate will be

described based on Yilmaz and cetintas (2005) and Oesterle et al (2001):

In winter time, exterior heat transfer resistance can be increased through qualified

insulation which is provided by exterior supplemental skin. In addition despite

the low U- value of constantly ventilated double skin façade in thermal

transmission equivalent in comparison to the single skin façade, the outcomes

will increase in quality while partly or totally there is not opening in the cavity

during heating process. Moreover, heat loss rate will be reduced as a result of

reduction in heat transfer amount through raised temperature and decreased air-

flow speed in the cavity.

In summer time, building envelope takes in the emitted energy which reaches the

building, thus re- scattered waves of infrared energy can not transport to the

exterior though the glass. Therefore, the trapped air inside the cavity will be

increased in temperature through convection. In addition the transferring of the

heated air inside the cavity occurs by means of conduction through glazing.

According to Oesterle’s study applying double skin facades in to the buildings

will decrease the heat transfer amount from exterior to the interior and thus the

amount of energy which is demanded in order for cooling purposes of the

building. Depending on this research the heat transfer amount in constant

condition is described as U-value; therefore heat flow through the building

components is pretended by U- value (in W/ K) in constant condition with one

degree of temperature difference among varied components. Moreover, low U-

value rate implies to the high thermal resistance of the building components.

Page 31: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

17

Where U= W/ K

= External heat transfer coefficient (W/ K)

= Internal heat transfer coefficient (W/ K)

= Conduction of multiple glazing units (W/ K)

The exterior heat transfer coefficient is indicated as which is reflected on the exterior

glazing of the building based on the outside condition. The indicates heat transfer

coefficient of the cavity space in which convection and conduction of the cavity is the

result of the transfer of remained radiation through the glass lead to reflection of the

interior glazing and walls of the cavity. Finally, is indicator of the accumulated and

remained heat through conduction and radiation that reaches the room. Heat transfer

mechanism through single skin glass is illustrated in Figure 2.2. In addition figure 2.3

displays the heat transfer mechanism through double skin façade. Furthermore, figure 3.3

indicates the impact of conduction, convection and solar radiation on movement of the air

inside the cavity. Figure 2.8 also describe the factors that affect heat transfer through

building skin.

Figure 2.8 Heat transfer through single skin glazing (Source: Yellamraju, 2004)

Page 32: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

18

Figure 2.9 Heat transfer through single skin glazing (Source: Yellamraju, 2004)

2.4.3 Natural ventilation and double skin façade

According to Azarbayjani (2010) however the optimization of mechanical ventilation has

been increased in last half century, natural ventilation also can be considered as well

ventilating solution and cost effective system in comparison to air conditioning system.

Based on this study in natural ventilation in it is intended to reduce the amount of energy

which is consumed for cooling by taking advantage of natural driving forces as well as

possible.

Azarbayjani (2010) states that increased interior heat loads and deeper plans of highly

populated buildings lead to come up with mechanically ventilated construction in which

introduced air in to the building can be controlled. Therefore, in order to reach

satisfactory and comfort of occupants through having uniform interior space temperature,

it has been required to control the introduced air in to the building.

According to Gratia and Herde (2004b) and Azarbayjani (2010) building velocity is

increased in respect to its height. Therefore, healthy solution of building ventilation

should be taken in to account. She states that in order to solve the velocity problem,

façade of the building was sealed and so mechanical ventilation was utilized as

ventilating system, conventionally. As a result, in traditional solution, façade of the

building was closed and introduced air in to the building could be controlled. Moreover,

because of flapping risk of shading devices in high rise buildings, the shading devices

were suggested to be eliminated; thus these lead to come up with the façade which was

closed with second skin.

Page 33: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

19

Azarbayjani (2010) mentions that it has been claimed that considerable amount energy

can be saved through by taking advantage of natural ventilation through utilizing double

skin façade. She also states that according to the Grabe et al (2002) study on temperature

performance and air flow attitudes of naturally ventilated double skin facades, heat

sources which are close to window panes lead to increase of temperature.

Based on the study done by Gratia and Herde (2004a,b,c) and (2007a,b,c) on strategies of

natural ventilation on double skin facades it has been explained that in order to provide

appropriate ventilation during day and night, window opening should be applied to the

building despite inadequate wind attitudes. In addition, in their point of view, utilizing

cavity air for ventilation in south facing double skin façade during winter is not adequate

while air moves downward in the openings as a result of high pressure of the wind. As a

result building cooling load is increased because of the warmed cavity air that reached the

building interior. Moreover, because of high temperature of the cavity air than outside

temperature along the day it should be taken in to account to provide louver control

system in order to prevent increase of cooling loads through natural ventilation in south

facing double skin façade.

Finally, based on Azarbayjani (2010) study, natural ventilation of the building can be

driven in two ways including stack/buoyancy driven and wind driven ventilation. She

explains that in both stack and wind driven ventilation outside fresh air can reach interior

space of the building and unfavorable heat can be driven to the outside.

2.4.4 Mechanical ventilation and HVAC systems

Oesterle (2001) states that it has been believed most commonly that with appearance of

double skin façade there is no need for applying mechanical ventilation in to the building.

In his point of view, such a subject should not be generalized while it should also not be

ignored depending on the applied constraints on each distinct case. For example, absence

of mechanical ventilation in to the building in high temperature conditions will lead to

thermal discomfort, though occupant dissatisfaction.

Oesterle (2001) describes that satisfaction evaluation of the habitants in entire naturally

ventilated building differs from high to low. He gives an example of Gladbacher bank in

Monchengladbach in Germany which provides high occupants satisfaction by increasing

thermal comfort quality through utilizing scope in window ventilation. On the other side,

the study also explains displeasure of occupants where air- conditioning system is not

planted in to the building because of economical issues and lack of adequate space for

such a system; in which occupants were unsatisfied due to overheating problems and

insufficient fresh air supply in the absence of mechanical ventilation.

As a result, based on Oesterle (2001) in spite of wind flow problems and extreme noise,

facilitating of natural ventilation by double skin facades throughout the year is

considerably appreciable. On the other hand, according to this study by utilizing air-

Page 34: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

20

conditioning in building ventilation system high satisfaction of thermal comfort can also

be reached inside the building.

According to the Oesterle (2001) double skin facades provide scope for decreasing

installation dimension of the mechanical air- conditioning due to more qualified

association of building physics with these types of construction. Therefore, Oesterle

mentions that during winter more improved seal and U- value is provided through

utilizing double skin façade that single ones.

Oesterle (2001) explains that in the case of sealed windows it is required to take

advantages of mechanical ventilation. He adds that interior skin of façade in the case of

having double skin façade can be opened in order for natural ventilation ; thus in such a

situation partial mechanical ventilation can be installed in place of using systems which

supply cooling, heating, humidification and dehumidification. Oesterle states that partial

and full air conditioning systems are separated from each other in the case of

humidification and dehumidification and also through decreasing of cooling capacity.

Moreover, depending on this study partial air conditioning system can also be called

“supporting ventilation system with cooling”.

Based on Oesterle (2001) in supporting ventilation system, mechanical air conditioning

system is utilized in high temperature of the summer and low temperature during winter;

thus due to low heating and cooling loads during other seasons the building have to be

managed in the absence of this system in other seasons.

According to Streicher (2005) by utilizing HVAC (Heating, Ventilating and Air

Conditioning) systems desired and demanded environmental condition can be provided in

a space. Based on this study certain performance demands’ including energy

consumption, thermal comfort and air quality should be provided in a building.

Based on Saelens, Carmeliet and Hens (2003) and Streicher (2005) energy consumption

demands’ means that the energy which is required to heat and cool the building and the

energy which is required for building operation should be as effective as possible through

utilizing free cooling and heat recovery based on climatic conditions. In addition indoor

air quality demands’ means that particular ventilation efficiency and indoor air flow

should be reached. Moreover, in order to reach thermal comfort demands’ comfortable

level of interior space should be provided which means that it is not valuable to have too

much cool or warm environment. As a result in order to have valuable interior space air

quality and reduced energy consumption, energy efficient and properly controlled

ventilation system is required.

Streicher (2005) presents two approaches for the building with HVAC systems:

“A building with its own separate heating, cooling and ventilating system, where

a second skin is added to the façade. The cavity of the double skin façade is only

ventilated to the outside and is built to reduce noise, contain solar shading and

light redirection devices”.

Page 35: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

21

“A building where the heating, cooling and ventilating system of the building is

integrated in to the double skin façade e.g. by ventilating the building using the

cavity of double skin façade”.

Streicher (2005) describes some of the benefits of double skin facades which are effective

on HVAC system as it is cited at below:

Firstly, cooling loads can be reduced through double skin facades by mounting daylight

enhancing and solar shading devices in to the space inside the air gap.

Secondly, electricity consumption for ventilating can be reduced through double skin

facades as they provide natural ventilation.

Thirdly, heat losses and heat loads can be reduced during winter through the cavity in

double skin façade since the cavity offers thermal buffer zone and provides passive solar

gain.

Page 36: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

22

Page 37: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

23

CHAPTER 3

3 MATERIALS AND METHODS

section includes

the introduction of the case study which is Medicorium Building in Ankara and the dat

section, collection, measurement and evaluation of the data will be presented.

3.1 Materials

In this research the Akman Medicorium Medicine center is selected as a case study in

order to conduct research on the impact of double skin facades on thermal performance of

the buildings. Along this research, in order to record temperature and relative humidity

six data loggers were utilized which were located in four different spaces of the building.

Accordingly, the case study building which is the Akman Medicorium center, data

loggers which are used for collection and measurement of data will be described in this

section.

3.1.1 Case study building

In the case study the effect of double skin facades on thermal performance of building

was examined through evaluating and comparing outdoor and indoor air quality in

Akman Medicorium building.

a) General description: Akman Condominium Bu -

is located in Balgat region in Ankara. The

building is designed and constructed by Mustafa Yuce in 1997. The Akman

Condominium Center is constructed as three distinct building in which the

Medicorium center is connected to the main body through a laminated glass

bridge which is supported by a steel structure. Hence, the building is composed

of the main body which is the hotel with the height of 110 meter and 31 stories,

the Medicorium health center and the Emporium which is the shopping center.

The main entrance of the Medicorium building in which the survey is conducted

is in south façade.

Page 38: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

24

Figure 3.1 Akman Condominium Business Center- Medicorium Center

(Source: http://wowturkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=21, 6.2.2013)

Figure 3.2 Entrance of Akman Condominium Business Center- Medicorium Center

(Source: www.akmanmedicorium.com, 6.2.2013)

Page 39: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

25

Figure 3.3Top view from Akman Medicorium health center

Page 40: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

26

Figu

re 3

.4 S

ite p

lan

of M

edic

oriu

m C

ente

r

Page 41: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

27

Figu

re 3

.5 T

he p

lan

of m

edic

oriu

m c

ente

r

Page 42: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

28

Figu

re 3

.6 S

ectio

n fr

om A

kman

Med

icor

ium

hea

lth c

ente

r

Page 43: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

29

b) Ventilation system: Based on the research and interviews with staff of the

Medicorium medicine center it is understood that the building ventilation is done

mechanically through air conditioning system. In Medicorium health center both

heating and cooling is done solely by central air conditioning system throughout

the year in which for taking advantage of heating through mechanical system

natural gas is utilized.

Additionally through the interview with ventilation system responsible staff of

Medicorium health center it has been discovered that there is no exact date for

starting heating and cooling ventilation in the building. Therefore, heating and

cooling of the building depends on the weather condition of the Ankara in which

heating of the building starts when it is less than 10 degree and cooling starts

when it is more than 22 degrees centigrade.

Moreover, amount of electricity consumption in Medicorium building by

considering only mechanical based ventilation (heating and cooling) is

approximately about 29, 440 KW for each month (2013) which provides monthly

electricity costs between 9.500 and 10.000 Turkish Lira (2013).

As it is stated further in this study the south façade of the building will be

examined in which two grills are located in the empty space between regular wall

and glass facade of the building. According to the examination it is discovered

that cool air is emitted through the grills which located in empty space between

glass and wall. Figure below shows the location of the grills on the plan.

Figure 3.7 Grills location at south façade of the building

Page 44: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

30

Figure 3.8 Grills location in south façade of Medicorium health center

Page 45: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

31

Figure 3.9 Grills location in rooms of Akman Medicorium health center

Page 46: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

32

c) Glass facade information: The east and west façade of the building is composed

of three storied curvilinear glass walls in front of regular walls of the building.

Moreover, as shown in the figure 2.19 the east and west articulated glass façade

of the building with 30 meter height is supported through glass wall systems

which afford view over street.

Figure 3.10 The South facade of Akman Medicorium Center

(Source: www.akmanmedicorium.com, 6.2.2013)

Figure 3.11 The entrance and south facade of Akman Medicorium Center

Page 47: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

33

Through the interview with the architect of the building it is found out that the

security glass type was utilized in facade of the building. Therefore, according to

the www.trakyacam.com in order to reduce the risks of injuries as result of

possible glass breakage and additionally in order to provide security against

external attack the glass type has to be laminated glazing. Moreover, based on

Trakya Cam Sanayi laminated security glazing is manufactured with clear or

opaque PVB (Poly Vinyl Butyral) film layers and these types of glazing is proper

recommendation to be utilized in hospitals. Furthermore, depending on the

http://www.aisglass.com “Laminated glass is a sandwich made of one piece of

plastic Poly Vinyl Butyral between two or more glasses. The PVB sticks with the

glass, forms chemical as well as mechanical bonds. When laminated with

annealed glass, the layer maintains the geometric integrity of the pane in case of

breakage. Also it gives acoustic insulation as well as gives protection against

damage caused due to UV radiation because it cuts almost 97% of UV radiation

present in the sunlight. A Laminated glass is regarded as a safety glass by most of

the standards”. The each glass pair in the façade of the case study building has

1.24 widths and 2.42 length. Table 3.1 displays some of the properties of

laminated security glass.

Table 3.1 Properties of laminated security glass (source: www.trakyacam.com)

PVB

Thickness

(mm)

Glass Thickness

(mm)

Standard

Dimensions

(mm)

Thickness

Tolerance

(mm)

Clear

0.38

0.76

3+3

4+4

3210 x 2250

3210 x 2500

3210 x 6000

± 0.4

Clear

0.38

0.76

5+5

6+6

3210 x 2250

3210 x 2500

3210 x 6000

± 0.4

Opaque

0.38

4+4

5+5

3210 x 2500

3210 x 6000

± 0.4

Therefore, according to the data at hand it can be realized that the each glass pair

is divided in to the smaller parts and so the glass type in façade of the building

should be categorized among glass with the thickness of 3+ 3 which has the

Page 48: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

34

minimum standard dimensions. As a result, depending on Table 3.2 which

achieved from www.nationalglass.com it is found out that the U- value of the

glass in the façade of the building is approximately about 5.8 or 5.7 with SHGC

of 0.79. Thus, it is realized that the non- ventilated laminated security glazing

(Glass with PVB film layers) with high U- value and SHGC has been utilized in

the façade of the building.

Table 3.2 SHGC and U- value of laminated glass (source: www.national

glass.com)

Laminated Glass SHGC U- value (W/ K)

6.38mm 0.79 5.8

6.76mm 0.79 5.7

8.38mm 0.75 5.7

8.76mm 0.75 5.6

10.38mm 0.72 5.6

10.76mm 0.72 5.6

12.38mm 0.70 5.6

12.76mm 0.70 5.5

In this study in order to examine the impact of double skin facades on thermal

performance of buildings the spaces between regular walls and the East- South

and West- South façade of building was selected for data collection as the façade

of building is composed of curvilinear glass wall in front of regular wall.

Moreover, it is also decided to select some data from attic and atrium. Table 3.2

describes the features of the locations where the were selected for data collection.

In this study cleaning staff in Medicorium building helped in finding information

about the cleaning of the selected four spaces which data loggers were located.

According to the cleaning staff since cavity of the South-East and South-West

facade, atrium and attic are not used in the building, thus cleaning issues in these

spaces are not happened frequently but occasionally and once in a month for

about 10 or 15 minutes.

Page 49: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

35

Figure 3.12 The interior view from south facade of Akman Medicorium Center

Page 50: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

36

Table 3.3 Features of selected locations for data collection

Space Between

East – South

Façade and

Regular Wall

Space Between

West – South

Façade and

Regular Wall

Atrium Fire Exit

Floor -1 -1 +1 +2

Facing

Facade East- South West- South West- North West

Purpose of

Use

Empty Space

between regular

wall and glass

wall

Empty Space

between regular

wall and glass

wall

Atrium Fire exit

Floor

Material Mosaic tiles Mosaic tiles Mosaic tiles Stone

Ventilation

System Air conditioner Air conditioner Air conditioner Air conditioner

Heating

System Air conditioner Air conditioner Air conditioner Air conditioner

In this study cleaning staff in Medicorium building helped in finding information about

the cleaning of the selected four spaces which data loggers were located.

According to the cleaning staff since cavity of the South-East and South-West facade,

atrium and attic are not used in the building, thus cleaning issues in these spaces are not

happened frequently but occasionally and once in a month for about 10 or 15 minutes.

3.1.2 Data loggers

In this study Onset HOBO U12 data loggers were utilized in order for collection and

measurement of data. Onset HOBO U12 data loggers are located in selected locations of

the building and they can record and measure the temperature and relative humidity

themselves.

Onset HOBO U12 data loggers are utilized in indoor spaces. In addition, HOBOware pro

software is required in order to readout and launch data loggers. The collected and

recorded data can be downloaded to the computer both in tabular and graphical manner

through utilizing HOBOware software.

Page 51: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

37

Figure 3.13 Onset HOBO U12 data logger

(Source: http://www.onsetcomp.com/products/data-loggers/u12-012, 6.2.2013)

3.1.3 Weather data for Ankara

In this research Ankara weather data were acquired from http://www.eurometeo.com.

Afterwards, all data were imported to the Excel and thus temperature graph for Ankara

weather data could be reached between 14 May and 23 July. Figure 3.8 displays

temperature chart for Ankara between 14 May and 23 July.

Page 52: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

38

Figu

re 3

.14

Tem

pera

ture

cha

rt fo

r Ank

ara

(14

May

201

3 to

23

July

201

3)

Page 53: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

39

3.2 Method

The study was conducted in two sections. Firstly, as a field study in order to achieve

temperature and relative humidity, data collection through data loggers were done by

recording data in selected locations of the case study. Afterwards, in order to perceive

existing condition and its possible causes the evaluation and interpretation of data was

done. In the following chapter the evolution of the study will be presented gradually and

more in detail.

3.2.1 Data collection

In this study in order to reach temperature and relative humidity, data were collected in

four different spaces of the Medicorium building through utilizing six data loggers. The

data is recorded with 15 minute intervals at each selected location.

The collected data can be affected negatively by locating data loggers in inappropriate

spaces; for instance placement of data loggers in spaces which are exposed to the direct

sunlight, additional heat amount or humidity and air movement will result to come up

with incorrect and unreliable recorded values. Thus, it is seriously significant and

influential to notice in placement of the data loggers in suitable and proper places. Table

3.3 describes the location of the data loggers and sensors.

Page 54: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

40

Figu

re 3

.15

Dat

a lo

gger

s’ lo

catio

n on

the

plan

Page 55: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

41

Table 3.4 locations of Data loggers

Data

Logger

Location

Data

Logger

Height

from Floor

Numbe

r of

Sensors

Sensor

Location

Sensor

Height

from

Floor

Number

of Data

Loggers

Outputs

DL01

South.East

façade-

Inside-On

the column

210 m 1

Outside-

On the

glass

206 m 2

DL07

South.West

Façade-

Inside- On

the

windowsill

84 m

1

Outside-

On the

glass

126 m

1

DL09

Atrium-

Inside- On

the step bar

66 m

1

Inside- On

the wall

193 m

1

DL11

Fire exit-

Outside-

On the step

bar

58 m

0 _ _

1

DL15

South.East

façade-

Inside- On

the column

210 m

1

Inside- On

the glass

140 m

1

DL16

South.West

façade-

Inside- On

the column

210 m

1

Inside- On

the glass

193 m

2

In this study the temperature and relative humidity were taken between 14 May 2013 and

23 July 2013. In addition all selected four spaces were empty during the data recording

except for cleaning purposes once in a month.

Page 56: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

42

Figure 3.16 Data logger DL 01- South.East facade

Page 57: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

43

Figure 3.17 Data logger DL 07- South.West facade

Page 58: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

44

Figure 3.18 Data logger DL 09- Atrium

Page 59: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

45

Figure 3.19 Data logger DL 11- Fire exit

Page 60: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

46

Figure 3.20 Data logger DL 15- South.East facade

Page 61: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

47

Figure 3.21 Data logger DL 16- South.West façade

Page 62: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

48

3.2.2 Data evaluation

In this research all data which recorded from south east and south west façade, attic and

fire exit between 14 May and 23 July were downloaded through data loggers to the

computer with the HOBOware pro software. Afterward, all collected data were imported

in to the excel software which provides data in both tabular and graphical presentation.

Therefore, the overall data which recorded at each location could be examined.

Page 63: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

49

CHAPTER 4

4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

4.1 Temperature data

In this section the recorded data will be displayed both in graphical and tabular forms and

accordingly the evaluation of temperature data which were collected from south façade,

atrium and fire exit in Akman Medicorium Center will be done.

Data loggers were placed at the locations shown in Figure 3.12 on the 14th

May 2013.

They collected temperature data at 15 minutes interval until the 23rd

of July 2013;

however, one data logger (DL01) was removed on the 11th of July 2013. Moreover, 5 of

data loggers had sensors attached to record the surface temperature of the glazing.

As it is described in previous chapter, DL11 was located at the fire exit of the building on

the staircase at the height of 58cm above from the floor to collect the exterior data.

The outdoor temperature data is displayed in Figure 4.1. These data were downloaded

and graphs were produced. Accordingly, for these graphs the day that data logger has the

hottest and coolest period was selected and thus evaluations were done for 3 days in the

selected area.

As it is displayed in Figure 4.1 the temperature reaches high values between 30 May

2013 to 1 June 2013.

Furthermore, as can be seen on the graph the temperature has lowest values from 14 May

2013 to 16 May 2013. Therefore, the evaluations were done for indicated days with

highest and lowest temperature values.

The minimum and maximum temperature values recorded by data loggers and sensors are

displayed in Table 4.1 where in the first column data loggers and sensors identity, in the

second column location of data loggers, in the third column minimum temperature value,

in the fourth column the date and time for minimum temperature, in the fifth column

maximum temperature value and in the sixth column the date and time for maximum

temperature value are displayed.

Page 64: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

50

Fi

gure

4.1

Tem

pera

ture

dat

a co

llect

ed fr

om th

e ex

terio

r (D

L11)

Page 65: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

51

T

able

4.1

Th

e m

inim

um

and m

axim

um

tem

per

ature

val

ues

rec

ord

ed b

y d

ata

logger

s an

d s

enso

rs f

or

sele

cted

3 d

ays

Tem

per

taure

(°C

)

DL

#

Loca

tion

Min

D

ate

and T

ime

of

Min

M

ax

Dat

e an

d t

ime

of

Max

DL

01

On t

he

colu

mn

15.9

1

16 M

ay 2

013,

4:1

5 A

M

34

.09

31

May

20

13

, 2:3

0 P

M

DL

01-

Sen

sor

Exte

rior

gla

ss

14.8

5

16 M

ay 2

013,

4:1

5 A

M

25

.21

31

May

20

13

, 2:3

0 P

M

DL

07

on t

he

win

dow

sill

17.1

7

16 M

ay 2

013,

6:4

5 A

M

49

.58

1 J

un

e 20

13

, 4:4

5 P

M

DL

07

- S

enso

r ex

teri

or

gla

ss

15.2

7

16 M

ay 2

013,

6:4

5 A

M

27

.53

1 J

un

e 20

13

, 4:4

5 P

M

DL

09

Atr

ium

19.8

4

16 M

ay 2

013,

5:4

5 A

M

34

.28

31

May

20

13

, 3:3

0 P

M

DL

09-

Sen

sor

On t

he

stai

rcas

e 17.4

6

16 M

ay 2

013,

5:4

5 A

M

25

.73

31

May

20

13

, 3:3

0 P

M

DL

11

Fir

e ex

it-

Exte

rio

r 11.5

6

16 M

ay 2

013,

6:0

0 A

M

28

.89

31

May

20

13

, 5:3

0 P

M

DL

15

On t

he

colu

mn

16.1

5

16 M

ay 2

013,

6:3

0 A

M

36

.52

31

May

20

13

, 12

:30 P

M

DL

16

On t

he

colu

mn

17.0

5

16 M

ay 2

013,

6:4

5 A

M

41

.56

1 J

un

e 20

13

, 4:1

5 P

M

DL

16-

Sen

sor

win

dow

pan

e 16.0

7

16 M

ay 2

013,

6:4

5 A

M

28

.47

1 J

un

e 20

13

, 4:1

5 P

M

Page 66: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

52

4.1.1 Temperature comparison for hottest days

In this section the temperature data comparison and evaluation will be done in both

tabular and graphical forms for selected 3 days. The Figure 4.2 presents a comparative

graph for peak temperature in the south- west and south- east DSF cavity and the exterior

as well as the atrium. Data loggers which located inside also had sensors attached to the

glass as shown in Figure 3.12.

As it is displayed in Figure 4.2 it can be realized that the external temperature ranges

from 17 (°C) to 28 (°C). In addition, the space temperature ranges from 22 (°C) to 50

(°C) where glass façade temperature ranges from 17 (°C) to 27 (°C) and the window pane

temperature ranges from 18 (°C) to 27 (°C).

In addition, the space temperature of 3 data loggers is higher than the exterior and interior

surface temperatures in which the highest space temperature values is for space at the

south- west façade because of exposure to the direct sunlight from the west. Therefore,

according to the data at hand it can be concluded that the there is a remarkable difference

between space and outside temperature while exterior glass temperature does not reach

too much high values; which means that space inside becomes too hot as a result of

exposure to the direct sunlight.

As it is explained in previous chapter, the building is fully air- conditioned in which the

windows openings are completely sealed. Additionally, according to the interviews to the

staff of the building it was found out that the DSF cavity is an unoccupied space except

once in a month when the staff cleans it.

The data logger 01 was located at the south-east façade cavity, placed on the column at

the height of 210cm from the floor and one sensor attached to the external surface of the

glass façade at the height of 206cm from the floor.

According to the Table 4.1, the maximum temperature value recorded by data logger 01

is 34.09 °C for 31 May 2013 at 2:30 PM. Moreover, the maximum surface temperature

value is 25.21 °C for the same day.

It is indicated that however the outdoor temperature is about 28.39 °C based on the

recorded data by data logger 11 at 2:30 PM on 31 May, the space temperature is

increased to 34.09 °C. Therefore, by finding the difference between space and surface

temperature it is found out that the space has 8.88 °C higher temperature in comparison

to the glass façade.

The data logger 07 was located at the south-west façade cavity, placed on the windowsill

at the height of 84cm from the floor and one sensor attached to the internal surface of the

glass façade at the height of 126cm from the floor.

Page 67: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

53

According to the Table 4.1, the maximum temperature value recorded by data logger 07

is 49.58 °C for 1 June 2013 at 4:45 PM. Moreover, the maximum surface temperature

value is 27.53 °C for the same day.

It is indicated that however the outdoor temperature is about 24.72 °C based on the

recorded data by Data logger 11 at 4:45 PM on 1 June, the space temperature is increased

to 49.58 °C. Therefore, by finding the difference between space and surface temperature

it is found out that the space has 23.05 °C higher temperature in comparison to the glass

façade.

The data logger 09 was located at the atrium of the building at the height of 66cm above

from the floor at the second floor of the building and one sensor attached to the internal

envelope (wall) of the building at the height of 193cm from the floor.

According to the Table 4.1, the maximum temperature value recorded by data logger 09

is 34.28 °C for 31 May 2013 at 3:30 PM. Moreover, the maximum interior surface

temperature value is 25.73 °C for the same day.

It is indicated that however the outdoor temperature is about 28.76 °C based on the

recorded data by Data logger 11 at 3:30 PM on 31 May, the space temperature is

increased to 34:28 °C. Therefore, by finding the difference between space and interior

surface temperature it is found out that the space has 8.55 °C higher temperature in

comparison to the glass façade.

The data logger 16 was located at the south-west façade of the building at the height of

210cm from the floor at DSF cavity and one sensor attached to window pane at the height

of 193cm from the floor.

According to the Table 4.1, the maximum temperature value recorded by data logger 16

is 41.56 °C for 31 May 2013 at 12:30 PM. Moreover, the maximum interior surface

temperature value is 28.47 °C f0r the same day.

It is indicated that however the outdoor temperature is about 26.28 °C at 12:30 PM on 31

May, the space temperature is increased remarkably to 41.56 °C. Therefore, by finding

the difference between interior space and interior glass temperature it is found out that the

space has 13.09 °C higher temperature in comparison to the interior glass.

Based on the data at hand in pervious analysis on DL01, DL07, DL09 and DL16 it is

indicated that the glass surface whether glass façade or interior glass at regular wall does

not absorb the heat but allows sunlight to pass through the glass. Therefore, here also it

can be concluded that however exposure of direct sunlight in to the space does not

increase the interior glass temperature in a high degree but causes heat to accumulate in

the space considerably.

The low temperature of the interior glass in comparison to the space temperature is also

indicator of the fact that the interior glass also adds to the heating loads of the space. In

Page 68: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

54

addition by referring to the figure 4.2 it is realized that there is a remarkable difference

between space and sensor temperatures in which space temperature displays high values.

Moreover, the space temperature of 3 data loggers is higher than the exterior and interior

surface temperatures; which means that the building has high heating loads inside.

Page 69: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

55

Fi

gure

4.2

Tem

pera

ture

dat

a co

mpa

rison

for h

otte

st d

ays f

rom

30

May

to 1

June

201

3

Page 70: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

56

4.1.2 Temperature comparison for coolest days

In this section the temperature data comparison and evaluation will be done in both

tabular and graphical forms for selected 3 days. The Figure 4.3 presents a comparative

graph for coolest days in the south- west and south- east DSF cavity and the exterior as

well as the atrium. Data loggers which located inside also had sensors attached to the

glass as shown in Figure 3.12.

As it is displayed in Figure 4.3 it can be realized that the external temperature ranges

from 13 (°C) to 23 (°C). In addition, the space temperature ranges from 17 (°C) to 43

(°C) where glass façade temperature ranges from 14 (°C) to 26 (°C) and the window pane

temperature ranges from 18 (°C) to 26 (°C).

In addition, the space temperature of 3 data loggers is higher than the exterior and interior

surface temperatures in which the highest space temperature values is for space at the

south- west façade because of exposure to the direct sunlight from the west. Therefore,

according to the data at hand it can be concluded that the there is a remarkable difference

between space and outside temperature even in the coolest days.

Additionally, according to the Figure 4.3 the surface temperature does not reach much

low values even in coolest days because excessive heat builds up in the cavity during the

day and thus the glass temperature does not drop as low as the external temperature.

Therefore, according to the data at hand it can be concluded that the space inside

becomes too hot as a result of exposure to the direct sunlight passes through the glass and

so the glass façade does not prevent space to become hot.

As it is explained in previous chapter, the building is fully air- conditioned in which the

windows openings are completely sealed. Additionally, according to the interviews to the

staff of the building it was found out that the DSF cavity is an unoccupied space except

once in a month when the staff cleans it.

According to the Table 4.1 the minimum space temperature value recorded by data logger

01 is 15.91 °C for 16 May 2013 at 6:15 AM and 14.85 °C for exterior surface

temperature at the same day.

Additionally, according to the Table 4.1 the minimum space temperature value recorded

by data logger 07 is 17:17 °C for 16 May 2013 at 6:45 AM and 15:27 °C for glass façade

temperature on 16 May 2013 at 6:45 AM. Therefore, it can be concluded that the glass

façade is cooler than the interior space while there is no occupancy loads; which means

that the glass does not absorb the heat considerably and thus space temperature increases

because of solar heat gain passes through the glass and makes space to become hot.

Moreover, according to the Table 4.1 the minimum space temperature value recorded by

data logger 09 is 19.84 °C for 16 May 2013 at 5:45 AM and 17.46 °C for interior space

temperature on 16 May 2013 at 5:45 AM. Therefore, it can be concluded that as result of

Page 71: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

57

direct sunlight through glass roof of the building the space temperature increases notably

even though the interior surface is not too much warm. Additionally, according to the

Table 4.1 the minimum space temperature value recorded by data logger 16 is 17.05 °C

for 16 May 2013 at 6:45 AM and 16.70 °C for interior glass temperature on 16 May 2013

at 6:45 AM. As a result through comparing minimum space temperature and minimum

interior surface temperature it can be realized that interior space temperature is also

higher than interior glass temperature in the building.

Page 72: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

58

Figu

re 4

.3 T

empe

ratu

re d

ata

com

paris

on fo

r coo

lest

day

s fro

m 3

0 M

ay to

1 Ju

ne 2

013

Page 73: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

59

4.2 Humidity data

The humidity data which collected between 14 may 2013 to 23 July 2013 through data

logger 11 at fire exit of the building are displayed in Figure 4.3. In addition in order to

evaluate humidity data, the maximum exterior relative humidity was selected through the

representative graph of exterior humidity and thus evaluations were done for 3 days in the

selected area. As it is displayed in Figure 4.3 the humidity reaches high values from 8 to

10 June 2013. Therefore, these dates were used to compare humidity data for the cavity,

atrium and outdoor.

The maximum relative humidity values recorded by data loggers are displayed in Table

4.3 where in the first column data loggers and sensors identity, in the second column

location of data loggers, in the third column maximum humidity value and in the fourth

column the date and time for maximum humidity value are displayed.

Table 4.2 The maximum humidity values recorded by data loggers for

selected 3 days

Relative humidity (%)

DL# Location Max Date and Time of Min

DL01 On the column 48.85 10 June 2013, 7:00 AM

DL07 on the windowsill 57.15 10 June 2013, 8:15 AM

DL09 Atrium 43.99 10 June 2013, 5:45 AM

DL11 Fire exit- Exterior 66.26 8 June 2013, 10:45 PM

DL15 On the column 51.43 10 June 2013, 6:30 AM

DL16 On the column 50.04 10 June 2013, 8.15 AM

Page 74: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

60

Figu

re 4

.4 re

lativ

e hu

mid

ity d

ata

colle

cted

from

the

exte

rior l

ocat

ion

(DL1

1)

Page 75: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

61

In this section the humidity data comparison and evaluation will be done in both tabular

and graphical forms for selected 3 days. The Figure 4.4 presents a comparative graph for

peak humidity in the south- west and south- east DSF cavity and the exterior as well as

the atrium. As it is displayed in Figure 4.4 it can be realized that the external humidity

ranges from 25 % to 66 %. In addition, the space humidity ranges from 20 % to 58 %. In

addition, as it is seen in the graph the outside humidity is higher than the relative

humidity for all data loggers. Moreover, the highest humidity value is for data logger

07..Therefore, according to the data at hand it can be concluded that the there is a

remarkable difference between space and outside humidity in which space humidity

shows lower values than the outside; which means that space inside becomes too hot as a

result of exposure to the direct sunlight.

According to the Table 4.2 the Maximum space humidity value recorded by data logger

01 at south- east façade cavity is 48.85 % for 10 June 2013 at 7:00 AM and 65.99 % for

exterior humidity at the same day. Therefore, by finding the difference between space

and outdoor humidity value it is found out that the relative humidity of the space

decreases considerably about 17.14 %; which means that inside temperature increases

and building bears high heat loads. The temperature inside is 27.89°C and surface

temperature displays 20.45°C for the same day and same time.

The Table 4.2 displays that the Maximum space humidity value recorded by data logger

07at south- west façade cavity is 57.15 % for 10 June 2013 at 8:15 AM and 69.01 % for

exterior humidity at the same day. Therefore, by finding the difference between space

and outdoor humidity value it is found out that the relative humidity of the space

decreases considerably about 11.86 %; which means that inside temperature increases

and building inside becomes too hot. The temperature inside is 20.61°C and surface

temperature displays 15.73°C for the same day and same time.

The Table 4.2 displays that the Maximum space humidity value recorded by data logger

09 at the atrium is 43.99 % for 10 June 2013 at 5:45 AM and 61.86 % for exterior

humidity at the same day. Therefore, by finding the difference between space and

outdoor humidity value it is found out that the relative humidity of the space decreases

considerably about 17.87 %; which means that temperature inside reaches high values

and thus building inside becomes too hot. The temperature inside is 22.51°C and surface

temperature displays 17.73°C for the same day and same time.

The Table 4.2 displays that the Maximum space humidity value recorded by data logger

15 at the south- east façade cavity is 51.43 % for 10 June 2013 at 6:30 AM and 62.59 %

for exterior humidity at the same day. Therefore, by finding the difference between space

and outdoor humidity value it is found out that the relative humidity of the space

decreases considerably about 11.16 %; which means that here also temperature inside

reaches high values and thus building inside becomes too hot. The temperature inside is

19.96°C for the same day and same time.

Page 76: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

62

The Table 4.2 displays that the Maximum space humidity value recorded by data logger

16 at the south- west façade cavity is 50.04 % for 10 June 2013 at 8.15 AM and 69.01 %

for exterior humidity at the same day. Therefore, by finding the difference between space

and outdoor humidity value it is found out that the relative humidity of the space

decreases considerably about 18.97 %; which means that here also temperature inside

reaches high values and thus building inside becomes too hot. The temperature inside is

19.93°C and surface temperature displays 17.96°C for the same day and same time.

Page 77: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

63

Figu

re 4

.5 H

umid

ity d

ata

com

paris

on fo

r hot

test

day

s fro

m 8

June

to 1

0 Ju

ne 2

013

Page 78: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

64

4.3 Features of space and glass in relation to the results

As presented in pervious sections it is indicated that the space temperature reaches high

level in comparison to the glass façade of the building. The glass façade does not absorb

the heat and thus becomes cooler than interior space which becomes too hot because of

direct sunlight that passes through the glass façade and so in spite of the low temperature

of the glass surface, the space temperature rises remarkably as a result of direct solar heat

gain through the glass façade. In addition, DSF glazing can only be laminated glass

because for double or triple glazing, framing is necessary therefore it is not preferred;

while the laminated glass has higher u- values and SHGC than the latter types and so this

leads to high heat gain. So it is realized that contrary to the common belief, the glass type

does not affect the thermal behavior of the DSF cavity if the space is not ventilated any

way.

Page 79: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

65

CHAPTER 5

5 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Human comfort and satisfaction are essential elements that should be taken in to account

in design of the buildings. Thermal behavior of buildings is highly influential factor in

providing occupants with high level of comfort and less environmental disturbance.

Invalid thermal performance and air condition of the space will affect occupants’

performance, productivity and health which will be a result of excessive heating and

cooling loads inside the building.

Double skin facades play significant role in thermal performance of buildings due to their

impact on heating and cooling loads of indoor spaces. The high rate of heat loss and gain

is done through the glass in building surface. Therefore, the study concentrates on the

impact of double skin facades on thermal performance of buildings.

In this study, through collected temperature and relative humidity data it is realized that

the interior temperature increases remarkably as a result of accumulated heating loads

inside the building. In addition, high U- value and SHGC of the laminated glass also adds

to the heating loads of the space. Therefore, not only the glass type in façade of the

building does not prevent interior space from reaching high temperature values but adds

to the heating loads of the building through letting direct sunlight in to the space.

In this investigation, providing high comfort level for occupants is of utmost importance

because in hospital buildings sufficient and qualified thermal performance has to be

presented for patients’ health and comfort. As a result, in order to reduce excessive

heating loads it is demanded to cool the building. It is recommended to utilize natural

ventilation that creates stack effect in the cavity and dissipate the heat built- up in the

cavity of DSF during summer and reduces the total energy consumption. Hence, non-

ventilated double skin façade of the building impact cooling loads of the space. These

types of facades could only harvest solar heat and thus create the greenhouse effect. It is

recommended to apply ventilated double skin façade in to the building which contribute

to the thermal comfort of the space throughout the year because these types of facades are

able to regulate thermal exchange between the exterior and interior. For example

according to the Figure 2.6 shaft- box type can be applied to the building which takes

advantage of natural ventilation and increases the stack effect in the cavity. Therefore, the

trapped heat in different parts of the cavity moves up and is extracted through the outlets

on the upside.

Additionally, in order to provide thermal comfort it can be suggested to utilize shading

devices during the summer. Moreover, for the winter time it can be proposed to use open

windows and grills in order to take pre- heated air from the cavity.

Page 80: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

66

Page 81: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

67

REFERENCES

Alessi, B. (2008). Double skin façade and its benefits. Denmark: Copenhagen Technical

University.

Alibaba, H. Z. & Ozdeniz, M. B. (2011). Thermal comfort of multiple- skin facades in

warm climate offices, DOI: 10.5897/ SRE11.319, 6(19), 4065-4078.

Andreotti, G. (2001). From single to double skin facades. Via Colleoni, 50, 360- 362.

Angus, H.H. & Associates Limited, Consulting Engineers. (2001). Draft Study of a

Double Wall Façade. Canada: University of Torento centre for Cellular and Biomedical

research.

Aronas, D. & Glicksman, L. R. (2000b). Double Skin, Airflow Facades: Will the Popular

European model Work in the USA? Proceedings of the ACE3 2000 summer study on

energy efficiency in buildings. New York.

Aronas, D. (2000a). Properties and Applications of Double- Skin Buildings Facades.

USA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Aydin, O. (2006). Conjugate heat transfer analysis of double pane windows. Building and

Enviornment, 41, 109-116.

Azarbayjani, M. (2010). Beyond arrows: energy performance of a new, naturally

ventilated double- skin façade configuration for a high- rise office building in Chicago.

USA: University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign.

Berezovska, E. (2011). Double skin glass facades: Benefit for the indoor environment in

urban areas. Denmark: Via University College Arhus.

Compagno, A. (2002). Intelligent Glass Facades: Material, Practice, design. Basel,

Boston, Berlin: Birkhauser Publishers.

Eggers, I., Matthes, P., Panaskova, J. & Muller, D. (2009). Façade integrated hybrid

ventilation system for school buildings. Germany: RWTH Aschen University, E, On

energy research center.

Gelesz, A. & Reith, A. (2011).Classification and re-evaluation of double skin facades.

DOI: 10.1556/IRASE, 2, 129-136.

Gratia, E. & Herde, A. D. (2004a). is day natural ventilation still possible in office

buildings with a double- façade? Building and Environment, 39(4), 399.

Page 82: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

68

Gratia, E. & Herde, A. D. (2004b). Natural cooling strategies efficiency in an office

building with a double- skin façade. Energy and Buildings, 36(11), 1139-1152.

Gratia, E. & Herde, A. D. (2004c). optimal operation of a south double- skin façade.

Energy and buildings, 36(1), 41.

Gratia, E. & Herde, A. D. (2007a). Are energy consumptions decreased with the addition

of a double- skin? Energy and Buildings, 39(5), 605-619.

Gratia, E. & Herde, A. D. (2007c). Guidelines for improving natural daytime ventilation

in an office building with a double- skin façade. Solar energy, 81(4), 435-448.

Gratia, E. &Herde, A. D. (2007b). Greenhous effect in double- skin façade. Energy and

buildings, 39(2), 199-211.

Gruner, M. (2012). The potential of façade- integrated ventilation systems in Nordic

climate. Norway: NTNU university.

Heinberg, J., Davidson, J. & Williamson, B. (2007). Builder’s guide to energy efficient

homes in Louisiana: Insulation Materiala and Techniques. Louisiana: Lousiana

department of natural resources, technology assessment division.

Hesselaar, B. L. H. (2006). Climate adaptive skins: Towards the new energy- efficient

façade. 1st International Conference on the Management of Natural Resources,

Sustainable development and Ecological Hazards, RAVAGE OF THE PLANET, 99,

351-360.

Ismail, K. A. R. & Salinas, C. (2006). Non- gray radiative convective conductive

modeling of a double glass window with a cavity filled with a mixture of absorbing

gases. Heat and mass transfer, 49, 2972-2983.

Ismail, K. R. R., Salinas, C. T. & Henriquez, J. R. (2008). Comparison between PCM

filled glass windows and absorbing gas filled windows. Energy and Buildings, 40, 710-

719.

Loncour, X., Deneyer, A., Blasco, M., Flamant, G. & Wouters, P. (2004). Ventilated

Double Facades: Classification & illustration of façade concepts. Belgium: Belgium

Building Research Institute, Department of building physics, Indoor Climate & Building

Services.

National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). (2000). Elements of an energy- efficient

house. 27853. Information service program, under the DOE office of energy and

renewable energy.

Oesterle, E., Lieb, R. D., Lutz, M. & Heusler, W. (2001). Double- Skin Facades:

Integrated Planning.Munich,London, New York: Prestel.

Page 83: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

69

Pollard, B. & Beatty, M. (2008 and November). Double skin facades, more is less?.Paper

presented at International Solar Energy Society Conference, Sydney, Australia.

Raffnose, L. M., (2007). Thermal performance of airflow windows. Denmark: Technical

University of Denmark, Department of Civil Engineering.

Saelens, D., Carmeliet, J. & Hens, H. (2003). Energy performance assessment of

multiple- skin facades. HVAC Research, 9(2), 167- 185.

Streicher, w. (2005). Best Façade: Best Practice for Double skin Façade.

(EIE/04/135/S07.38652). Austria: Graz University of Technology, Institute of Thermal

engineering.

Wong, P. C. (2008). Natural ventilation in double skin-façade design for office buildings

in hot and humid climate. Austraila: University of New South Wales.

Yellamraju, V. (2004). Evaluation and design of double –skin facades for office buildings

in hot climates.Texas: A& M University.

Yilmaz, Z. & Cetintas, F. (2005). Double skin façade’s effect on heat losses of office

buildings in Istanbul. Energy and Buildings, 37, 691-697.

Page 84: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

70

Page 85: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

71

APPENDIX A

TEMPERATURE DATA FOR THREE HOTEST DAYS

Page 86: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

72

Tab

le A

Tem

per

ature

dat

a fo

r th

ree

hott

est

day

s

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

:30

23

.54

5

18.3

12

22.9

92

17.8

26

24.9

44

19.9

04

19

.93

6

23

.37

6

44

.15

7

23

.30

4

19

.19

1

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

:45

23

.42

4

18.2

17

22.8

72

17.7

1

24.8

71

19.8

72

19

.81

7

23

.23

2

44

.29

2

23

.18

4

19

.13

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

:00

23

.32

8

18.1

11

22.7

53

17.6

04

24.8

23

19.8

29

19

.36

5

23

.11

2

44

.24

7

23

.04

19

.07

5

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

:15

23

.20

8

17.9

95

22.6

57

17.5

3

24.7

5

19.7

87

19

.17

5

23

.01

6

44

.24

7

22

.92

19

.02

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

:30

23

.06

4

17.9

21

22.5

13

17.4

46

24.6

77

19.7

55

19

.27

22

.89

6

44

.11

3

22

.8

18

.95

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

:45

22

.94

4

17.8

57

22.4

17

17.3

82

24.6

29

19.7

33

19

.24

6

22

.77

6

44

.30

7

22

.68

1

18

.90

5

5/3

0/2

01

3 3

:00

22

.84

8

17.8

05

22.3

21

17.3

93

24.5

57

19.6

91

19

.22

2

22

.65

7

44

.06

8

22

.58

5

18

.86

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 3

:15

22

.72

9

17.7

62

22.2

26

17.3

61

24.5

08

19.6

7

19

.10

3

22

.56

1

44

.26

2

22

.46

5

18

.83

1

5/3

0/2

01

3 3

:30

22

.63

3

17.7

41

22.1

54

17.2

88

24.4

36

19.6

38

19

.22

2

22

.44

1

44

.26

2

22

.36

9

18

.78

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 3

:45

22

.53

7

17.6

88

22.0

58

17.2

45

24.3

88

19.6

06

19

.15

1

22

.34

5

44

.27

7

22

.27

4

18

.74

6

5/3

0/2

01

3 4

:00

22

.46

5

17.6

46

21.9

87

17.1

72

24.3

15

19.5

84

19

.10

3

22

.25

44

.27

7

22

.15

4

18

.71

4

5/3

0/2

01

3 4

:15

22

.36

9

17.5

93

21.8

91

17.1

72

24.2

67

19.5

53

19

.03

2

22

.15

4

44

.24

7

22

.05

8

18

.67

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 4

:30

22

.29

8

17.5

62

21.8

19

17.1

08

24.2

19

19.5

31

18

.88

9

22

.03

4

44

.24

7

21

.96

3

18

.62

9

5/3

0/2

01

3 4

:45

22

.22

6

17.5

2

21.7

48

17.0

56

24.1

71

19.5

1

18

.77

1

21

.96

3

44

.27

7

21

.86

7

18

.59

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 5

:00

22

.13

17.4

77

21.7

17.0

35

24.1

22

19.4

89

18

.72

3

21

.86

7

44

.18

7

21

.77

2

18

.56

6

5/3

0/2

01

3 5

:15

22

.03

4

17.4

25

21.6

52

17.0

14

24.0

74

19.4

57

18

.46

1

21

.79

5

44

.06

8

21

.67

6

18

.53

4

5/3

0/2

01

3 5

:30

21

.98

7

17.3

82

21.6

04

17.0

14

24.0

5

19.4

46

18

.24

7

21

.72

4

43

.8

21

.60

4

18

.50

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 5

:45

21

.86

7

17.3

3

21.5

81

17.0

45

24.0

02

19.4

36

18

.29

5

21

.7

43

.63

7

21

.53

3

18

.49

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 6

:00

21

.79

5

17.3

51

21.6

04

17.0

77

24.0

02

19.4

46

18

.31

9

21

.7

43

.29

9

21

.48

5

18

.48

1

5/3

0/2

01

3 6

:15

21

.724

17.3

93

21.6

52

17.1

4

24.0

02

19.4

57

18

.48

5

21

.74

8

42

.83

1

21

.48

5

18

.50

2

Page 87: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

73

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/3

0/2

01

3 6

:30

21

.7

17.4

67

21.7

72

17.2

88

24.0

02

19.4

99

18

.74

7

21

.89

1

41

.95

3

21

.50

9

18

.54

5

5/3

0/2

01

3 6

:45

21

.72

4

17.5

83

21.9

39

17.4

88

24.0

74

19.5

84

18

.93

7

22

.13

41

.06

1

21

.58

1

18

.61

9

5/3

0/2

01

3 7

:00

21

.77

2

17.8

47

22.2

02

17.8

15

24.2

43

19.7

44

19

.38

9

22

.48

9

40

.30

9

21

.72

4

18

.71

4

5/3

0/2

01

3 7

:15

21

.93

9

18.1

53

22.4

17

18.0

05

24.6

53

20.2

88

19

.67

4

22

.75

3

41

.03

3

21

.89

1

18

.82

5/3

0/2

01

3 7

:30

22

.13

18.4

71

22.6

57

18.1

53

25.3

07

20.3

84

19

.98

4

23

.04

41

.89

6

22

.05

8

18

.91

5

5/3

0/2

01

3 7

:45

22

.29

8

18.6

61

22.7

53

18.2

17

25.6

23

20.3

62

19

.93

6

23

.11

2

39

.25

5

22

.17

8

18

.97

9

5/3

0/2

01

3 8

:00

22

.46

5

18.7

99

22.9

92

18.4

39

25.7

2

20.5

12

19

.93

6

23

.49

7

39

.35

22

.29

8

19

.06

4

5/3

0/2

01

3 8

:15

22

.56

1

18.8

2

23.2

32

18.6

61

25.6

23

20.4

8

19

.81

7

23

.95

4

39

.62

3

22

.51

3

19

.17

5/3

0/2

01

3 8

:30

22

.75

3

19.0

85

23.3

52

18.7

35

26.0

36

20.8

12

20

.05

5

24

.02

6

40

.07

5

22

.60

9

19

.21

3

5/3

0/2

01

3 8

:45

23

.04

19.4

25

23.5

93

19.0

11

26.6

95

21.1

65

20

.50

7

24

.48

4

36

.00

5

22

.77

6

19

.29

7

5/3

0/2

01

3 9

:00

23

.18

4

19.3

51

23.9

05

19.3

19

26.6

22

20.9

51

20

.41

2

25

.13

7

35

.35

6

23

.04

19

.42

5

5/3

0/2

01

3 9

:15

23

.4

19.6

8

24.1

22

19.4

89

27.1

86

21.7

14

21

.03

2

25

.96

3

32

.26

9

23

.25

6

19

.52

1

5/3

0/2

01

3 9

:30

23.7

13

19.9

57

24.4

36

19.7

44

27.7

02

21.6

17

21

.39

27

.18

6

28

.00

4

23

.52

1

19

.64

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 9

:45

24

.05

20.2

56

24.7

26

19.8

61

27.9

74

21.9

4

21

.67

6

27

.87

5

22

.97

9

23

.78

5

19

.76

5

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

0:0

0

24

.48

4

20.7

26

24.8

47

19.8

51

28.3

94

22.2

42

22

.01

1

27

.72

7

20

.79

23

.93

19

.81

9

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

0:1

5

24

.89

5

20.9

62

25.4

04

20.3

62

28.4

68

22.3

83

22

.03

4

29

.79

20

.10

6

24

.31

5

20

.02

1

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

0:3

0

25

.18

6

20.9

08

25.4

28

20.3

73

28.3

69

22.1

99

22

.08

2

29

.66

5

8.1

43

24

.43

6

20

.09

6

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

0:4

5

25

.62

3

21.3

59

25.5

98

20.5

55

28.6

92

22.6

21

22

.82

4

31

.68

9

25

.60

5

24

.62

9

20

.21

3

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

1:0

0

25

.98

7

21.5

52

25.7

93

20.7

79

28.7

66

22.9

03

22

.96

8

32

.48

4

16

.81

4

24

.84

7

20

.35

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

1:1

5

26

.57

3

22.0

15

26.0

12

20.9

83

29.0

65

23.0

77

23

.4

32

.66

5

8.1

32

25

.08

9

20

.51

2

Page 88: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

74

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

1:3

0

27

.18

6

23.2

62

26.2

8

21.1

33

29.3

4

23.5

45

23

.90

5

33

.39

1

8.1

32

25

.38

20

.69

4

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

1:4

5

28

.89

1

24.6

86

26.8

42

21.5

09

29.6

65

23.9

61

24

.21

9

34

.17

6

8.1

53

25

.84

1

20

.92

9

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

2:0

0

29

.86

5

25.5

27

27.4

56

21.8

1

29.9

41

23.8

41

24

.55

7

33

.73

25

.46

1

26

.30

4

21

.13

3

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

2:1

5

30

.41

9

25.7

28

27.6

77

21.7

14

30.2

68

23.9

83

25

.08

9

32

.89

8

35

.98

26

.52

4

21

.17

6

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

2:3

0

30

.69

7

25.2

83

27.6

77

21.5

09

30.4

95

24.0

71

25

.13

7

32

.27

8

32

.65

6

26

.62

2

21

.19

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

2:4

5

30

.64

6

24.2

13

28.0

48

21.6

38

30.6

21

23.8

84

24

.72

6

32

.09

8

33

.65

9

26

.89

1

21

.29

4

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

3:0

0

30

.41

9

23.6

87

27.8

5

21.2

94

30.4

95

23.8

08

24

.75

31

.66

3

39

.43

2

26

.84

2

21

.21

9

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

3:1

5

30

.41

9

23.6

44

27.9

49

21.3

16

30.5

71

23.8

73

24

.96

8

31

.20

4

39

.14

7

26

.86

7

21

.19

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

3:3

0

30

.24

3

23.0

33

27.7

76

21.1

22

30.3

94

23.5

89

24

.60

5

30

.9

38

.16

9

26

.81

8

21

.14

4

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

3:4

5

29

.94

1

22.7

08

27.5

79

20.9

51

30.1

92

23.4

8

24

.60

5

30

.64

6

39

.74

6

26

.74

4

21

.05

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

4:0

0

29

.74

22.5

56

27.2

1

20.7

26

30.0

66

23

.404

24

.62

9

30

.11

7

39

.55

4

26

.54

9

20

.92

9

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

4:1

5

29

.51

5

22.3

07

27.4

07

21.0

58

29.9

16

23.2

62

24

.46

29

.89

36

.41

6

26

.74

4

21

.01

5

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

4:3

0

29

.16

5

21.9

83

32.9

49

23.1

31

29.6

65

23.0

33

24

.24

3

30

.19

2

38

.36

8

29

.89

22

.05

9

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

4:4

5

28

.96

5

22.0

91

31.9

7

23.1

1

29.4

9

23.1

42

24

.43

6

30

.11

7

39

.75

9

30

.39

4

22

.45

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

5:0

0

29

.38

9

23.0

33

34.8

36

24.5

98

30.0

16

23.8

3

25

.47

7

30

.19

2

40

.46

2

33

.67

8

23

.45

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

5:1

5

29

.41

4

22.7

94

36.7

42

25.7

39

30.2

93

23.7

31

25

.06

5

30

.16

7

41

.21

6

35

.18

2

24

.20

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

5:3

0

29

.64

23.0

55

37.0

69

26.4

99

30.6

97

24.1

25

25

.84

1

30

.09

1

41

.48

4

36

.01

2

25

.32

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

5:4

5

29

.71

5

23.0

99

37.3

98

27.0

5

31.0

52

24.3

23

26

.13

4

30

.04

1

41

.68

2

36

.44

4

26

.43

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

6:0

0

29

.69

22.9

46

41.2

68

27.3

22

31.2

81

24.4

44

25

.89

29

.94

1

41

.82

4

36

.22

7

26

.51

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

6:1

5

29

.59

22.7

4

44.2

26

26.8

02

31.5

1

24.5

32

26

.42

6

29

.84

41

.92

4

34

.73

25

.97

3

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

6:3

0

29

.49

22.5

34

43.1

63

25.9

95

31.6

12

24.5

65

26

.54

9

29

.71

5

42

.03

9

34

.09

7

25

.42

7

Page 89: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

75

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

6:4

5

29

.34

22.3

29

38.8

12

26.1

96

31.7

14

24.5

76

26

.47

5

29

.59

42

.22

5

33

.44

3

24

.57

6

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

7:0

0

29

.21

5

22.1

56

36.6

88

24.9

4

31.7

14

24.5

54

26

.57

3

29

.43

9

42

.38

3

32

.74

2

23

.90

6

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

7:1

5

29

.06

5

22.0

05

35.2

62

23.7

97

31.7

65

24.4

99

26

.69

5

29

.29

42

.54

2

32

.15

23

.37

1

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

7:3

0

28

.91

6

21.8

75

33.8

09

23.1

97

31.7

14

24.3

89

26

.89

1

29

.14

42

.62

8

31

.48

4

22

.90

3

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

7:4

5

28

.79

1

21.7

67

32.5

36

22.4

04

31.5

1

24.2

35

26

.64

6

28

.96

5

42

.70

1

30

.87

4

22

.51

3

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

8:0

0

28

.64

2

21.6

27

31.4

08

21.8

54

31.2

04

24.0

71

26

.54

9

28

.79

1

42

.99

2

30

.26

8

22

.17

7

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

8:1

5

28

.46

8

21.4

98

30.5

2

21.4

45

31.0

26

23.9

06

26

.54

9

28

.61

7

43

.19

6

29

.76

5

21

.90

7

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

8:3

0

28

.32

21.3

69

29.7

65

21.1

65

30.8

74

23.7

64

26

.40

2

28

.41

9

43

.32

8

29

.26

5

21

.67

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

8:4

5

28

.12

2

21.2

3

29.1

15

20.8

97

30.7

48

23.5

67

25

.98

7

28

.22

1

43

.53

4

28

.84

1

21

.47

7

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

9:0

0

27

.94

9

21.0

8

28.5

43

20.6

51

30.4

95

23.3

27

26

.06

1

27

.99

8

43

.63

7

28

.44

4

21

.28

3

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

9:1

5

27

.75

1

20.9

29

27.9

98

20.3

84

30.1

92

23.0

99

25

.50

1

27

.77

6

43

.93

4

28

.07

2

21

.12

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

9:3

0

27

.57

9

20.7

79

27.4

81

20.1

28

29.9

16

22.8

92

25

.28

3

27

.53

44

.14

2

27

.72

7

20

.95

1

5/3

0/2

01

3 1

9:4

5

27

.35

8

20.6

08

27.0

14

19.9

04

29.6

4

22.6

75

24

.91

9

27

.28

4

44

.15

7

27

.40

7

20

.80

1

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

0:0

0

27

.16

1

20.4

37

26.6

22

19.6

7

29.3

65

22.4

69

24

.67

7

27

.03

8

44

.20

2

27

.08

7

20

.65

1

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

0:1

5

26

.96

5

20.2

24

26.2

8

19.4

68

29.0

9

22.2

64

24

.21

9

26

.81

8

44

.21

7

26

.81

8

20

.53

3

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

0:3

0

26

.74

4

19.9

57

25.9

87

19.2

87

28.8

41

22.0

69

23

.61

7

26

.57

3

44

.20

2

26

.54

9

20

.41

6

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

0:4

5

26

.52

4

19.7

33

25.7

2

19.1

59

28.5

93

21.8

86

23

.13

6

26

.37

8

44

.21

7

26

.28

20

.29

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

1:0

0

26

.30

4

19.5

53

25.4

77

19.0

75

28.3

2

21.7

03

22

.77

6

26

.15

8

44

.18

7

26

.03

6

20

.20

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

1:1

5

26

.08

5

19.4

14

25.2

58

19.0

11

28.0

23

21.5

2

22

.63

3

25

.93

9

44

.23

2

25

.84

1

20

.128

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

1:3

0

25

.89

19.2

87

25.0

65

18.9

26

27.7

02

21.3

59

22

.51

3

25

.76

8

44

.20

2

25

.64

7

20

.05

3

Page 90: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

76

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

1:4

5

25

.72

19.2

02

24.8

95

18.8

41

27.4

31

21.2

19

22

.44

1

25

.59

8

44

.21

7

25

.47

7

19

.98

9

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

2:0

0

25

.55

19.1

17

24.7

26

18.7

14

27.1

12

21.0

69

22

.32

1

25

.45

3

44

.23

2

25

.30

7

19

.92

5

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

2:1

5

25

.38

19.0

43

24.5

81

18.6

51

26.8

42

20.9

4

22

.27

4

25

.30

7

44

.21

7

25

.13

7

19

.86

1

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

2:3

0

25

.23

4

18.9

9

24.4

36

18.5

87

26.6

22

20.8

33

22

.17

8

25

.16

2

44

.24

7

24

.99

2

19

.80

8

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

2:4

5

25

.08

9

18.9

47

24.2

91

18.5

45

26.4

51

20.7

26

22

.05

8

25

.04

44

.26

2

24

.84

7

19

.76

5

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

3:0

0

24

.94

4

18.9

05

24.1

95

18.5

34

26.3

29

20.6

51

21

.96

3

24

.87

1

44

.23

2

24

.70

2

19

.71

2

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

3:1

5

24

.82

3

18.8

31

24.0

74

18.5

02

26.2

07

20.5

66

21

.53

3

24

.75

44

.21

7

24

.60

5

19

.67

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

3:3

0

24

.70

2

18.7

56

23.9

78

18.4

92

26.0

85

20.4

8

20

.96

24

.62

9

44

.23

2

24

.48

4

19

.61

6

5/3

0/2

01

3 2

3:4

5

24

.58

1

18.7

03

23.9

05

18.4

92

26.0

12

20.4

16

20

.96

24

.50

8

44

.21

7

24

.38

8

19

.59

5

5/3

1/2

01

3 0

:00

24

.48

4

18.6

72

23.8

33

18.4

39

25.8

9

20.3

52

20

.88

9

24

.41

2

44

.24

7

24

.26

7

19

.56

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 0

:15

24

.36

3

18.6

51

23.7

85

18.3

86

25.7

68

20.2

98

21

.05

6

24

.31

5

44

.20

2

24

.19

5

19

.53

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 0

:30

24

.26

7

18.6

08

23.7

13

18.3

44

25.7

2

20.2

45

21

.17

5

24

.21

9

44

.21

7

24

.09

8

19

.49

9

5/3

1/2

01

3 0

:45

24

.17

1

18.5

45

23.6

41

18.2

59

25.5

5

20.2

02

21

.12

7

24

.12

2

44

.20

2

24

.00

2

19

.46

8

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

:00

24

.07

4

18.4

71

23.5

69

18.2

17

25.4

53

20.1

6

21

.00

8

24

.02

6

44

.20

2

23

.90

5

19

.43

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

:15

23

.97

8

18.4

07

23.4

72

18.1

32

25.3

31

20

.117

21

.03

2

23

.90

5

44

.26

2

23

.80

9

19

.39

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

:30

23

.88

1

18.3

54

23.3

76

18.0

26

25.2

58

20.0

74

20

.96

23

.80

9

44

.27

7

23

.71

3

19

.35

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

:45

23

.78

5

18.3

01

23.2

8

17.9

74

25.1

37

20.0

42

20

.86

5

23

.71

3

44

.24

7

23

.61

7

19

.31

9

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

:00

23

.68

9

18.2

69

23

.184

17.9

1

25.0

65

20

20

.77

23

.61

7

44

.26

2

23

.52

1

19

.27

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

:15

23

.64

1

18.2

59

23.1

12

17.8

89

25.0

16

19.9

68

20

.77

23

.52

1

44

.21

7

23

.42

4

19

.24

4

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

:30

23

.56

9

18.2

17

23.0

4

17.8

36

24.9

68

19.9

46

20

.55

5

23

.44

8

44

.26

2

23

.35

2

19

.22

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

:45

23

.49

7

18.1

85

22.9

44

17.7

41

24.8

95

19.9

04

20

.60

3

23

.35

2

44

.26

2

23

.25

6

19

.18

1

Page 91: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

77

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/3

1/2

01

3 3

:00

23

.37

6

18.1

11

22.8

72

17.6

88

24.8

47

19.8

83

20

.46

23

.25

6

44

.23

2

23

.16

19

.138

5/3

1/2

01

3 3

:15

23

.30

4

18.0

69

22.7

76

17.5

93

24.7

26

19.8

4

20

.50

7

23

.16

44

.21

7

23

.06

4

19

.09

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 3

:30

23

.20

8

18.0

16

22.7

05

17.5

41

24.6

53

19.8

08

20

.24

6

23

.06

4

44

.24

7

22

.96

8

19

.05

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 3

:45

23

.11

2

17.9

31

22.6

09

17.4

56

24.5

57

19.7

65

19

.88

8

22

.968

44

.06

8

22

.87

2

19

.01

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 4

:00

23

.04

17.8

36

22.5

13

17.4

04

24.4

84

19.7

44

19

.62

7

22

.87

2

44

.24

7

22

.77

6

18

.97

9

5/3

1/2

01

3 4

:15

22

.94

4

17.7

73

22.4

41

17.3

51

24.3

88

19.7

02

19

.46

22

.77

6

44

.23

2

22

.68

1

18

.92

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 4

:30

22

.84

8

17.7

52

22.3

45

17.3

09

24.3

39

19.6

8

19

.41

3

22

.68

1

44

.21

7

22

.58

5

18

.89

4

5/3

1/2

01

3 4

:45

22

.77

6

17.6

99

22.2

74

17.2

56

24.2

91

19.6

38

19

.27

22

.58

5

44

.24

7

22

.48

9

18

.86

2

5/3

1/2

01

3 5

:00

22

.68

1

17.6

67

22.2

02

17.1

93

24.2

43

19.6

16

19

.31

8

22

.51

3

44

.14

2

22

.39

3

18

.82

5/3

1/2

01

3 5

:15

22

.58

5

17.6

36

22.1

3

17.1

82

24.1

95

19.5

84

19

.29

4

22

.41

7

43

.97

8

22

.32

1

18

.78

8

5/3

1/2

01

3 5

:30

22

.53

7

17.5

83

22.0

82

17.2

35

24.1

22

19.5

63

19

.24

6

22

.36

9

43

.71

1

22

.22

6

18

.75

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 5

:45

22

.46

5

17.5

41

22.0

82

17.2

88

24.0

98

19.5

63

19

.10

3

22

.34

5

43

.44

6

22

.17

8

18

.74

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 6

:00

22

.39

3

17.5

62

22.0

82

17.2

98

24.0

98

19.5

63

18

.88

9

22

.36

9

43

.21

1

22

.10

6

18

.73

5

5/3

1/2

01

3 6

:15

22

.34

5

17.6

46

22.1

06

17.3

4

24.0

98

19.5

74

19

.17

5

22

.46

5

42

.96

2

22

.08

2

18

.73

5

5/3

1/2

01

3 6

:30

22

.34

5

17.7

83

22.1

06

17.4

56

24.0

98

19.6

06

19

.41

3

22

.56

1

42

.68

6

22

.05

8

18

.74

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 6

:45

22

.34

5

17.9

21

22.1

78

17.4

98

24.1

71

19.6

59

19

.31

8

22

.72

9

42

.36

9

22

.05

8

18

.77

8

5/3

1/2

01

3 7

:00

22

.39

3

18.1

22.2

26

17.5

09

24.1

95

19.7

12

19

.81

7

22

.92

42

.32

5

22

.05

8

18

.79

9

5/3

1/2

01

3 7

:15

22

.48

9

18.2

69

22.2

74

17.5

41

24.7

26

20.7

26

19

.05

6

23

.13

6

42

.21

22

.05

8

18

.83

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 7

:30

22

.60

9

18.4

07

22.3

21

17.6

36

26.1

58

20.7

79

19

.10

3

23

.4

41

.91

22

.10

6

18

.86

2

5/3

1/2

01

3 7

:45

22

.75

3

18.5

98

22.3

93

17.7

62

27.2

1

20.7

05

19

.79

3

23

.66

5

41

.78

2

22

.15

4

18

.91

5

5/3

1/2

01

3 8

:00

22

.94

4

18.8

2

22.5

37

17.9

84

27.2

1

20.9

94

20

.55

5

23

.93

41

.49

8

22

.25

18

.96

8

Page 92: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

78

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/3

1/2

01

3 8

:15

23

.11

2

19.0

53

22.7

05

18.1

95

27.3

58

21.2

73

21

.07

9

24

.26

7

41

.11

7

22

.34

5

19

.05

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 8

:30

23

.30

4

19.2

97

22.8

96

18.5

02

27.7

02

21.2

94

20

.84

1

24

.65

3

40

.6

22

.44

1

19

.12

8

5/3

1/2

01

3 8

:45

23

.52

1

19.5

31

23.1

36

18.8

2

28.2

45

21.6

38

20

.91

3

25

.06

5

39

.78

7

22

.60

9

19

.22

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 9

:00

23

.78

5

19.7

76

23.4

19.0

96

28.6

67

22.0

91

21

.19

9

25

.67

1

36

.67

4

22

.77

6

19

.32

9

5/3

1/2

01

3 9

:15

24

.07

4

20.0

42

23.6

65

19.3

93

29.2

15

22.4

8

21

.77

2

27

.50

5

30

.48

2

22

.96

8

19

.44

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 9

:30

24

.41

2

20.3

2

23.9

3

19.7

65

30.0

66

22.4

15

22

.22

6

29

.19

29

.15

2

23

.18

4

19

.56

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 9

:45

24

.79

8

20.6

19

24.2

19

20.0

1

30.5

2

23.0

12

22

.75

3

31

.71

4

15

.00

6

23.4

1

9.7

02

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

0:0

0

25

.21

20.8

65

24.5

08

20.2

77

30.6

21

22.9

79

22

.72

9

33

.57

4

8.1

32

23

.61

7

19

.85

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

0:1

5

25

.67

1

21.2

08

24.8

23

20.5

01

30.8

49

23.5

78

23

.54

5

35

.02

2

8.1

11

23

.88

1

20

.01

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

0:3

0

26

.15

8

21.5

2

25.1

37

20.7

05

31.0

77

23.7

86

23

.97

8

36

.22

7

8.1

2

4.1

46

20

.18

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

0:4

5

26

.69

5

21.8

43

25.4

28

20.8

87

31.0

01

23.6

66

24

.31

5

36

.98

7

18

.89

4

24

.43

6

20

.35

2

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

1:0

0

27

.21

22.1

56

25.7

2

21.0

58

30.9

25

24.3

34

24

.70

2

36

.93

3

19

.44

6

24

.75

20

.51

2

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

1:1

5

27

.82

5

22.5

02

26.1

34

21.2

73

30.9

5

24.2

46

24

.60

5

35

.82

3

8.1

21

25

.13

7

20

.68

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

1:3

0

28

.51

8

24.1

58

26.3

53

21.3

91

31.0

26

24.6

86

25

.08

9

35

.58

2

8.1

32

25

.42

8

20

.83

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

1:4

5

30

.16

7

24.9

4

26.5

73

21.5

09

31.2

04

24.5

54

25

.52

5

36

.52

5

8.1

11

25

.72

20

.98

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

2:0

0

30

.84

9

25.4

72

26.8

42

21.7

57

31.3

06

24.5

21

25

.67

1

36

.60

6

8.1

32

26

.06

1

21

.14

4

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

2:1

5

31

.40

8

26.2

19

27.0

87

21.9

51

31.5

86

24.6

2

26

.03

6

36

.36

2

8.1

32

26

.42

6

21

.29

4

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

2:3

0

32

.07

3

26.5

44

27.3

58

22.1

02

31.7

91

24.7

74

26

.28

36

.11

9

32

.77

8

26

.76

9

21

.47

7

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

2:4

5

32

.82

26.5

89

27.6

53

22.2

64

32.1

24

24.9

73

26

.89

1

35

.74

3

35

.26

8

27

.16

1

21

.70

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

3:0

0

33

.23

5

26.6

27.8

75

22.2

85

32.4

33

25.1

5

26

.98

9

35

.47

5

36

.68

7

27

.80

1

21

.94

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

3:1

5

33

.54

8

26.3

42

28.2

45

22.5

02

32.6

91

25.2

72

27

.35

8

35

.42

2

37

.65

3

28

.51

8

22

.31

8

Page 93: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

79

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

3:3

0

33

.70

4

26.0

62

28.6

92

22.8

92

32.7

68

25.3

5

27

.62

8

35

.26

2

38

.68

9

29

.74

22

.75

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

3:4

5

33

.94

25.8

95

29.6

15

23.4

91

33.1

05

25

.494

27

.75

1

35

.07

5

39

.31

32

.92

4

23

.26

2

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

4:0

0

34

.07

1

25.6

61

31.7

65

24.1

8

33.3

13

25.5

94

27

.99

8

34

.88

9

39

.12

35

.23

5

23

.83

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

4:1

5

34

.09

7

25.3

5

34.6

77

24.3

01

33.5

74

25.7

39

27

.99

8

34

.57

2

41

.66

8

34

.86

3

24

.18

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

4:3

0

34

.09

7

25.2

17

37.7

25.3

05

33.7

83

25.8

84

28

.39

4

34

.30

8

39

.92

4

35

.39

5

24

.73

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

4:4

5

33

.88

7

24.6

53

39.1

49

26.1

96

33.9

14

25.6

16

28

.27

34

.12

4

40

.44

8

38

.42

1

25

.36

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

5:0

0

33

.78

3

24.7

63

38.1

7

25.8

06

33.9

66

25.8

72

28

.59

3

33

.86

1

40

.15

7

37

.42

5

25

.57

2

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

5:1

5

33

.73

24.7

41

36.0

39

24.8

52

34.1

76

26.0

06

28

.61

7

33

.39

1

39

.58

2

35

.50

2

25

.01

8

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

5:3

0

33

.52

1

24.3

78

36.7

15

25.8

17

34.2

81

25.7

39

28

.76

6

33

.15

7

41

.03

3

36

.93

3

25

.48

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

5:4

5

33

.00

1

23.8

51

35.8

5

25.4

16

33.9

66

25.3

83

28

.14

7

32

.79

4

41

.49

8

35

.55

5

25

.36

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

6:0

0

32

.69

1

23.7

75

39.1

77

26.4

43

33.8

87

25.5

05

28

.81

6

32

.53

6

41

.38

5

36

.09

2

25

.99

5

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

6:1

5

32

.33

23.4

69

42.6

54

26.2

75

33.7

04

25.2

5

28

.56

8

32

.33

42

.48

4

35

.12

8

25

.71

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

6:3

0

31

.99

6

23.2

51

39.5

45

25.0

62

33.5

21

25.2

39

28

.61

7

32

.07

3

41

.71

1

34

.25

5

24

.98

4

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

6:4

5

31

.76

5

23.1

1

36.6

88

24.5

43

33.4

17

25.1

06

29

.19

31

.86

8

41

.01

9

33

.67

8

24

.42

2

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

7:0

0

31

.48

4

22.9

25

35.6

09

24.4

66

33.2

35

24.8

19

28

.59

3

31

.74

40

.24

33

.23

5

24

.03

8

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

7:1

5

31

.25

5

22.8

92

34.6

24

23.8

3

32.9

49

24.6

64

28

.41

9

31

.66

3

40

.97

7

32

.84

6

23

.66

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

7:3

0

31

.07

7

22.8

92

33.7

04

23.4

8

32.7

94

24.7

3

28

.89

1

31

.43

3

43

.16

7

32

.30

4

23

.32

7

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

7:4

5

30

.95

22.8

16

32.5

62

22.9

57

32.7

42

24.5

43

28

.61

7

31

.12

8

41

.82

4

31

.79

1

23

.01

2

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

8:0

0

30

.74

8

22.5

88

31.7

4

22.5

13

32.5

1

24.3

34

28

.56

8

30

.87

4

42

.97

7

31

.28

1

22

.74

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

8:1

5

30

.52

22.4

04

31.0

77

22.2

31

32.1

75

24.0

82

27

.87

5

30

.64

6

43

.13

8

30

.79

8

22

.50

2

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

8:3

0

30

.29

3

22.2

1

30.5

2

22.0

37

31.9

96

23.9

28

27

.60

4

30

.41

9

43

.50

5

30

.39

4

22

.29

6

Page 94: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

80

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

8:4

5

30

.06

6

22.0

69

29.8

65

21.7

89

31.8

42

23.8

3

28

.02

3

30

.16

7

43

.46

29

.96

6

22

.09

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

9:0

0

29

.86

5

21.9

4

29.3

15

21.5

2

31.6

12

23.6

22

27

.92

4

29

.91

6

43

.81

5

29

.59

21

.90

7

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

9:1

5

29

.64

21.8

21

28.8

41

21.2

94

31.3

31

23.4

25

27

.35

8

29

.64

44

.02

3

29

.24

21

.73

5

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

9:3

0

29

.41

4

21.6

38

28.4

93

21.1

44

31.0

77

23.2

29

26

.94

29

.36

5

44

.09

8

28

.96

5

21

.59

5

5/3

1/2

01

3 1

9:4

5

29

.16

5

21.4

66

28.1

47

20.9

62

30.8

74

23.0

66

26

.52

4

29

.11

5

44

.11

3

28

.64

2

21

.44

5

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

0:0

0

28

.94

1

21.3

16

27.8

25

20.8

22

30.6

21

22.8

81

26

.40

2

28

.89

1

44

.21

7

28

.39

4

21

.33

7

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

0:1

5

28

.71

7

21.1

65

27.5

79

20.6

51

30.3

18

22.6

97

26

.18

2

28

.69

2

44

.23

2

28

.14

7

21

.23

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

0:3

0

28

.51

8

21.0

47

27.3

33

20.5

33

30.0

41

22.5

23

25

.96

3

28

.49

3

44

.23

2

27

.92

4

21

.14

4

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

0:4

5

28

.34

5

20.9

29

27.1

12

20.4

05

29.7

9

22.3

72

25

.67

1

28

.34

5

44

.20

2

27

.72

7

21

.04

7

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

1:0

0

28

.17

1

20.7

9

26.9

16

20.2

88

29.5

15

22.1

99

25

.45

3

28

.14

7

44

.23

2

27

.53

20

.96

2

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

1:1

5

27

.99

8

20.6

72

26.7

2

20.1

6

29.2

65

22.0

59

25

.25

8

27

.97

4

44

.24

7

27

.33

3

20

.87

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

1:3

0

27

.82

5

20.5

44

26.5

49

20.0

64

28.9

9

21.9

07

24

.89

5

27

.82

5

44

.21

7

27

.18

6

20

.80

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

1:4

5

27

.65

3

20.4

37

26.4

02

19.9

46

28.7

17

21.7

67

24

.67

7

27

.67

7

44

.24

7

27

.01

4

20

.72

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

2:0

0

27

.48

1

20.3

41

26.2

31

19.8

4

28.4

44

21.6

38

24

.50

8

27

.50

5

44

.21

7

26

.84

2

20

.65

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

2:1

5

27

.33

3

20.2

34

26.0

85

19.7

44

28.1

71

21.5

2

24

.17

1

27

.35

8

44

.20

2

26

.67

1

20

.57

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

2:3

0

27

.18

6

20.1

28

25.9

39

19.6

8

27.8

99

21.4

12

24

.00

2

27

.21

44

.24

7

26

.52

4

20

.50

1

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

2:4

5

27

.06

3

20.0

32

25.7

93

19.5

84

27.7

02

21.3

05

23

.85

7

27

.06

3

44

.26

2

26

.37

8

20

.43

7

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

3:0

0

26

.91

6

19.9

46

25.6

47

19.5

31

27.5

05

21.2

08

23

.64

1

26

.91

6

44

.23

2

26

.23

1

20

.37

3

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

3:1

5

26

.76

9

19.8

83

25.5

25

19.4

46

27.3

33

21.1

33

23

.42

4

26

.76

9

44

.23

2

26

.10

9

20

.30

9

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

3:3

0

26

.62

2

19.7

97

25.4

04

19.4

04

27.2

1

21.0

69

23

.20

8

26

.64

6

44

.24

7

25

.98

7

20

.25

6

5/3

1/2

01

3 2

3:4

5

26

.47

5

19.7

33

25.3

07

19.3

19

27.1

12

20.9

94

23

.08

8

26

.52

4

44

.21

7

25

.86

6

20

.20

2

Page 95: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

81

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

6/1

/20

13

0:0

0

26

.35

3

19.6

59

25.1

86

19.2

76

27.0

14

20.9

29

22

.94

4

26

.37

8

44

.23

2

25

.74

4

20

.14

9

6/1

/20

13

0:1

5

26

.25

6

19.5

84

25.0

65

19.1

59

26.9

16

20.8

87

22

.72

9

26

.23

1

44

.21

7

25

.59

8

20

.08

5

6/1

/20

13

0:3

0

26

.10

9

19.4

89

24.9

44

18.9

58

26.7

93

20.8

33

22

.36

9

26

.08

5

44

.21

7

25

.47

7

20

.02

1

6/1

/20

13

0:4

5

25

.98

7

19.4

04

24.8

23

18.8

52

26.6

95

20.7

69

22

.27

4

25

.93

9

44

.21

7

25

.35

5

19

.95

7

6/1

/20

13

1:0

0

25

.86

6

19.2

87

24.6

77

18.7

25

26.5

73

20

.705

21

.7

25

.79

3

44

.23

2

25

.23

4

19

.89

3

6/1

/20

13

1:1

5

25

.74

4

19.1

91

24.5

57

18.5

98

26.4

75

20.6

51

21

.27

25

.62

3

44

.26

2

25

.08

9

19

.82

9

6/1

/20

13

1:3

0

25

.57

4

19.0

53

24.4

36

18.4

39

26.3

78

20.5

98

20

.98

4

25

.45

3

44

.24

7

24

.94

4

19

.75

5

6/1

/20

13

1:4

5

25

.40

4

18.9

26

24.2

91

18.3

54

26.2

31

20.5

44

20

.62

7

25

.30

7

44

.24

7

24

.77

4

19

.70

2

6/1

/20

13

2:0

0

25

.23

4

18.7

99

24.1

46

18.2

38

26.1

09

20.4

91

20

.31

7

25

.16

2

44

.23

2

24

.62

9

19

.62

7

6/1

/20

13

2:1

5

25

.08

9

18.7

14

24.0

02

18.1

64

25.9

87

20.4

37

19

.91

2

25

.01

6

44

.11

3

24

.48

4

19

.56

3

6/1

/20

13

2:3

0

24

.91

9

18.6

19

23.8

81

18.1

11

25.8

66

20.3

95

19

.43

6

24

.84

7

44

.24

7

24

.33

9

19

.51

6/1

/20

13

2:4

5

24

.77

4

18.5

55

23.7

61

18.0

26

25.7

93

20.3

52

19

.77

24

.70

2

44

.23

2

24

.24

3

19

.45

7

6/1

/20

13

3:0

0

24

.65

3

18.4

92

23.6

17

17.9

63

25.6

71

20.2

88

19

.60

3

24

.55

7

44

.23

2

24

.09

8

19

.40

4

6/1

/20

13

3:1

5

24

.50

8

18.3

96

23.5

21

17.8

68

25.5

74

20.2

45

19

.24

6

24

.41

2

44

.29

2

23

.95

4

19

.35

1

6/1

/20

13

3:3

0

24

.38

8

18.3

12

23.4

17.7

94

25.5

5

20.2

02

18

.98

5

24

.26

7

44

.29

2

23

.83

3

19

.30

8

6/1

/20

13

3:4

5

24

.21

9

18.2

27

23.2

8

17.6

99

25.4

28

20.1

7

18

.41

4

24

.14

6

44

.23

2

23

.71

3

19

.25

5

6/1

/20

13

4:0

0

24

.09

8

18.1

53

23.1

84

17.6

25

25.3

31

20.1

28

18

.65

2

24

.00

2

44

.27

7

23

.59

3

19

.20

2

6/1

/20

13

4:1

5

23

.95

4

18.0

69

23.0

64

17.5

72

25.3

07

20.0

96

18

.46

1

23

.88

1

44

.21

7

23

.49

7

19

.15

9

6/1

/20

13

4:3

0

23

.83

3

17.9

84

22.9

92

17.5

09

25.2

1

20.0

53

18

.36

6

23

.73

7

44

.18

7

23

.37

6

19

.10

6

6/1

/20

13

4:4

5

23

.73

7

17.9

21

22.8

96

17.4

67

25.0

65

20.0

1

18

.50

9

23

.61

7

44

.21

7

23

.23

2

19

.05

3

6/1

/20

13

5:0

0

23

.61

7

17.8

57

22.8

17.3

82

25.0

16

19.9

68

18

.48

5

23

.49

7

44

.20

2

23

.13

6

19

.01

1

Page 96: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

82

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

6/1

/20

13

5:1

5

23

.49

7

17.8

05

22.7

29

17.3

4

24.9

68

19.9

46

18

.81

8

23

.37

6

43

.90

4

23

.01

6

18

.96

8

6/1

/20

13

5:3

0

23

.37

6

17.7

62

22.6

81

17.3

51

24.8

71

19.9

04

18

.65

2

23

.30

4

43

.68

2

22

.94

4

18

.92

6

6/1

/20

13

5:4

5

23

.28

17.7

52

22.6

57

17.3

82

24.8

23

19.8

93

18

.60

4

23

.25

6

43

.47

5

22

.82

4

18

.90

5

6/1

/20

13

6:0

0

23

.18

4

17.7

41

22.6

09

17.3

72

24.7

74

19.8

83

18

.31

9

23

.25

6

43

.19

6

22

.75

3

18

.87

3

6/1

/20

13

6:1

5

23

.11

2

17.7

73

22.6

09

17.4

04

24.7

02

19.9

04

17

.55

8

23

.28

42

.96

2

22

.68

1

18

.86

2

6/1

/20

13

6:3

0

23

.08

8

17.8

47

22.6

09

17.4

04

24.7

5

19.9

25

17

.91

5

23

.35

2

42

.83

1

22

.63

3

18

.85

2

6/1

/20

13

6:4

5

23

.04

17.9

42

22.6

33

17.4

25

24.8

23

19.9

57

18

.46

1

23

.47

2

42

.57

1

22

.60

9

18

.86

2

6/1

/20

13

7:0

0

23

.08

8

18.0

79

22.6

57

17.4

46

24.7

98

20

18

.86

6

23

.61

7

42

.42

6

22.5

85

18

.87

3

6/1

/20

13

7:1

5

23

.13

6

18.2

59

22.6

57

17.4

67

25.3

07

21.1

87

18

.2

23

.83

3

42

.22

5

22

.56

1

18

.89

4

6/1

/20

13

7:3

0

23

.25

6

18.4

39

22.6

81

17.4

98

26.9

4

21.1

55

18

.31

9

24

.07

4

41

.92

4

22

.53

7

18

.91

5

6/1

/20

13

7:4

5

23

.4

18.6

19

22.7

53

17.5

62

28.0

97

21.0

9

18

.69

9

24

.33

9

41

.82

4

22

.56

1

18

.94

7

6/1

/20

13

8:0

0

23

.54

5

18.7

88

22.8

24

17.6

78

28.0

97

21.3

26

18

.96

1

24

.58

1

41

.79

6

22

.58

5

19

6/1

/20

13

8:1

5

23

.68

9

19

22.9

44

17.8

68

28.3

45

21.5

95

19

.27

24

.84

7

41

.54

22

.65

7

19

.04

3

6/1

/20

13

8:3

0

23

.88

1

19.1

91

23.0

4

18.0

37

28.6

92

21.5

63

19

.41

3

25

.13

7

41

.23

22

.72

9

19

.09

6

6/1

/20

13

8:4

5

24

.07

4

19.3

61

23.2

32

18.3

01

29.0

9

21.9

18

19

.38

9

25

.50

1

38

.93

1

22

.84

8

19

.15

9

6/1

/20

13

9:0

0

24

.26

7

19.5

42

23.4

72

18.6

4

29.3

65

22.4

15

19

.69

8

26

.01

2

35

.47

22

.96

8

19

.26

6

6/1

/20

13

9:1

5

24

.53

2

19.7

76

23.7

13

18.9

15

29.7

65

22.5

34

20

.00

7

27

.65

3

30

.14

2

23

.06

4

19

.34

6/1

/20

13

9:3

0

24

.82

3

20.1

06

23.9

78

18.9

37

30.4

19

22.6

21

19

.98

4

28

.36

9

35

.36

9

23

.28

19

.42

5

6/1

/20

13

9:4

5

25

.08

9

20.1

6

24.2

19

19.2

13

30.8

74

23.1

75

20

.29

3

30

.92

5

9.5

03

23

.4

19

.53

1

6/1

/20

13

10:0

0

25

.33

1

20.2

24

24.3

88

19.2

34

30.3

69

22.5

02

20

.24

6

31

.76

5

38

.63

6

23

.56

9

19

.60

6

6/1

/20

13

10:1

5

25

.52

5

20.4

37

24.5

32

19.3

93

30.2

43

23.3

93

20

.77

33

.91

4

8.1

11

23

.68

9

19

.70

2

Page 97: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

83

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

6/1

/20

13

10:3

0

25

.81

7

20.5

33

24.6

77

19.5

31

30.0

16

23.0

01

20

.55

5

35

.36

8

8.1

11

23

.83

3

19

.80

8

6/1

/20

13

10:4

5

26

.08

5

20.6

83

24.8

47

19.6

8

29.9

66

23.0

77

20

.53

1

36

.09

2

20

.66

2

24

.00

2

19

.92

5

6/1

/20

13

11:0

0

26

.47

5

20.9

08

25.0

89

19.8

61

29.9

91

23.8

62

20

.72

2

36

.03

9

21

.69

2

24

.21

9

20

.07

4

6/1

/20

13

11:1

5

26

.96

5

21.2

19

25.4

28

20.0

64

29.9

91

23.7

09

21

.22

3

34

.96

9

8.1

2

4.5

57

20

.24

5

6/1

/20

13

11:3

0

27

.55

4

23.0

88

25.6

47

20.0

1

30.0

91

24.1

47

21

.46

1

34

.83

6

36

.09

5

24

.82

3

20

.34

1

6/1

/20

13

11:4

5

29

.66

5

24.5

98

25.9

39

20.2

13

30.1

92

24.3

01

21

.43

7

35

.60

9

37

.85

1

25

.06

5

20

.50

1

6/1

/20

13

12:0

0

30

.46

9

24.5

98

26.2

31

20.5

33

30.2

68

23.7

2

21

.98

7

35

.74

3

8.1

43

25

.38

20

.68

3

6/1

/20

13

12:1

5

30

.69

7

25.2

28

26.4

26

20.6

83

30.2

93

23.8

3

21

.46

1

35

.60

9

8.0

89

25

.67

1

20

.80

1

6/1

/20

13

12:3

0

31

.28

1

25.7

39

26.5

49

20.7

37

30.5

2

24.1

03

22

.25

35

.18

2

33

.77

25

.86

6

20

.88

7

6/1

/20

13

12:4

5

32

.07

3

25.6

39

26.8

42

20.8

76

30.7

98

24.2

13

22

.63

3

34

.86

3

36

.37

7

26

.25

6

21

.08

6/1

/20

13

13:0

0

32

.33

25.5

94

27.0

14

21.0

37

30.9

76

24.3

56

22

.77

6

34

.78

3

37

.6

26

.96

5

21

.34

8

6/1

/20

13

13:1

5

32

.63

9

25.5

16

27.1

86

21.1

98

31.2

04

24.5

21

22

.99

2

34

.57

2

40

.96

3

27

.53

21

.72

4

6/1

/20

13

13:3

0

32

.94

9

25.2

94

27.3

82

21.0

26

31.4

59

24.6

53

22

.92

34

.17

6

37

.44

3

28

.14

7

21

.89

7

6/1

/20

13

13:4

5

33

.07

9

24.8

08

28.0

97

21.7

89

31.6

63

24.7

41

23

.04

33

.80

9

40

.18

5

31

.79

1

22

.41

5

6/1

/20

13

14:0

0

32

.87

2

24.1

8

30.5

45

22.7

29

31.5

86

24.5

87

22

.63

3

33

.52

1

40

.64

2

34

.78

3

23

.08

8

6/1

/20

13

14:1

5

32

.82

23.9

72

35.1

82

23.6

33

31.7

14

24.7

41

23

.42

4

33

.20

9

41

.17

4

35

.04

9

23

.79

7

6/1

/20

13

14:3

0

32

.74

2

23.8

51

38.5

88

24.5

32

31.9

19

24.9

07

23

.64

1

32

.89

8

41

.41

3

35

.47

5

24

.52

1

6/1

/20

13

14:4

5

32

.61

3

23.8

19

39.9

71

25.3

28

32.1

24

24.9

84

24

.72

6

32

.63

9

41

.45

6

38

.86

8

25

.17

2

6/1

/20

13

15:0

0

32

.51

23.7

2

40.9

2

26.0

96

32.3

04

25.0

84

24

.05

32

.35

5

41

.51

2

40

.31

4

25

.86

1

6/1

/20

13

15:1

5

32

.38

1

23.6

55

42.0

01

26.7

24

32.3

55

25.1

28

24

.31

5

32

.12

4

41

.69

6

40

.97

8

26

.30

8

6/1

/20

13

15:3

0

32

.20

1

23.4

69

41.1

52

27.3

78

32.4

84

25.1

72

24

.26

7

31

.91

9

41

.75

3

41

.44

3

27

.20

9

Page 98: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

84

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

6/1

/20

13

15:4

5

31

.94

4

23.3

06

40.5

16

27

.673

32.6

13

25.1

95

24

.19

5

31

.66

3

41

.89

6

41

.56

28

.47

3

6/1

/20

13

16:0

0

31

.68

9

23.1

2

45.4

99

28.3

12

32.6

91

25.2

17

24

.31

5

31

.40

8

42

.13

9

40

.71

7

28

.55

3

6/1

/20

13

16:1

5

31

.33

1

22.7

08

49.5

81

27.5

37

32.7

94

25.1

95

24

.21

9

31

.15

3

42

.28

2

38

.42

1

27

.62

8

6/1

/20

13

16:3

0

30.9

76

22.4

37

48.1

06

26.4

88

32.7

68

25.1

17

24

.96

8

30

.9

42

.48

4

37

.17

8

26

.70

1

6/1

/20

13

16:4

5

30

.67

2

22.1

88

41.8

25

27.2

09

32.7

42

25.0

73

24

.72

6

30

.64

6

42

.64

3

36

.14

6

25

.59

4

6/1

/20

13

17:0

0

30

.36

9

21.9

29

39.0

36

25.3

83

32.5

62

24.9

18

24

.77

4

30

.39

4

42

.68

6

35

.12

8

24

.70

8

6/1

/20

13

17:1

5

30

.09

1

21.7

78

36.9

6

23.8

41

32.4

33

24.7

97

24

.79

8

30

.14

2

42

.84

6

34

.17

6

23

.99

4

6/1

/20

13

17:3

0

29

.81

5

21.5

84

35.1

82

23.0

23

32.2

78

24.6

53

24

.72

6

29

.91

6

42

.99

2

33

.31

3

23

.43

6

6/1

/20

13

17:4

5

29

.56

5

21.4

45

33.5

21

22.0

37

31.9

7

24.4

44

25

.13

7

29

.69

42

.99

2

32

.56

2

22

.96

8

6/1

/20

13

18:0

0

29

.31

5

21.3

16

32.2

01

21.4

34

31.6

89

24.2

46

24

.87

1

29

.46

4

43

.09

4

31

.86

8

22

.58

8

6/1

/20

13

18:1

5

29

.09

21.1

87

31.1

03

21.0

04

31.4

08

24.0

49

24

.84

7

29

.24

43

.26

9

31

.17

9

22

.25

3

6/1

/20

13

18:3

0

28

.86

6

21.1

12

30.2

43

20.6

94

31.1

53

23.8

62

24

.58

1

29

.01

5

43

.34

3

30

.57

1

21

.96

1

6/1

/20

13

18:4

5

28

.66

7

20.9

72

29.4

9

20.4

37

30.9

25

23.6

33

24

.26

7

28

.79

1

43

.51

9

30

.04

1

21

.72

4

6/1

/20

13

19:0

0

28

.46

8

20.8

65

28.8

91

20.2

88

30.6

46

23.3

27

24

.55

7

28

.56

8

43

.59

3

29

.56

5

21

.50

9

6/1

/20

13

19:1

5

28

.27

20.7

37

28.3

69

20.0

64

30.2

93

23.0

44

23

.80

9

28

.36

9

43

.78

5

29

.11

5

21

.31

6

6/1

/20

13

19:3

0

28

.04

8

20.6

3

27.8

75

19.8

4

29.9

66

22.7

94

23

.78

5

28

.14

7

44

.02

3

28

.66

7

21

.13

3

6/1

/20

13

19:4

5

27

.85

20.5

01

27.4

56

19.7

02

29.6

9

22.5

56

23

.54

5

27

.89

9

44

.18

7

28

.27

20

.96

2

6/1

/20

13

20:0

0

27

.65

3

20.3

41

27.0

63

19.5

53

29.4

39

22.3

29

23

.25

6

27

.65

3

44

.18

7

27

.92

4

20

.81

2

6/1

/20

13

20:1

5

27

.40

7

20.1

38

26.7

44

19.4

46

29.1

65

22.1

34

23

.08

8

27

.43

1

44

.26

2

27

.57

9

20

.69

4

6/1

/20

13

20:3

0

27

.18

6

19.9

57

26.4

51

19.3

51

28.8

91

21.9

29

22

.96

8

27

.18

6

44

.27

7

27

.30

8

20

.57

6

6/1

/20

13

20:4

5

26

.96

5

19.7

44

26.2

07

19.2

44

28.5

43

21.7

35

22

.84

8

26

.94

44

.20

2

27

.03

8

20

.48

Page 99: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

85

Tab

le A

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

6/1

/20

13

21:0

0

26

.76

9

19.5

63

25.9

63

19.1

06

28.2

45

21.5

52

22

.58

5

26

.72

44

.20

2

26

.79

3

20

.38

4

6/1

/20

13

21:1

5

26

.54

9

19.3

93

25.7

44

18.9

47

27.9

24

21.3

8

22

.41

7

26

.47

5

44

.26

2

26

.54

9

20

.26

6

6/1

/20

13

21:3

0

26

.32

9

19.2

55

25.5

5

18.8

41

27.6

28

21.2

3

22

.13

26

.23

1

44

.23

2

26

.32

9

20

.17

6/1

/20

13

21:4

5

26

.13

4

19.1

28

25.3

31

18.7

67

27.3

82

21.0

9

21

.93

9

26

.03

6

44

.23

2

26

.10

9

20

.08

5

6/1

/20

13

22:0

0

25

.93

9

19.0

11

25.1

37

18.6

61

27.2

1

20.9

72

21

.81

9

25

.86

6

44

.20

2

25

.91

4

20

6/1

/20

13

22:1

5

25

.76

8

18.9

15

24.9

44

18.5

87

26.9

89

20.8

65

21

.7

25

.67

1

44

.24

7

25

.74

4

19

.93

6

6/1

/20

13

22:3

0

25

.57

4

18.8

09

24.7

74

18.5

66

26.9

16

20.7

58

21

.48

5

25

.50

1

44

.23

2

25

.55

19

.87

2

6/1

/20

13

22:4

5

25

.40

4

18.7

25

24.6

29

18.5

55

26.8

18

20.6

83

21

.39

25

.35

5

44

.23

2

25

.42

8

19

.81

9

6/1

/20

13

23:0

0

25

.23

4

18.6

72

24.5

32

18.5

66

26.6

46

20.5

98

21

.50

9

25

.23

4

44

.23

2

25

.30

7

19

.77

6

6/1

/20

13

23:1

5

25

.08

9

18.6

4

24.4

12

18.4

6

26.5

20.5

23

21

.12

7

25

.08

9

44

.26

2

25

.18

6

19

.74

4

6/1

/20

13

23:3

0

24

.94

4

18.5

98

24.2

91

18.3

96

26.3

04

20.4

48

21

.27

24

.94

4

44

.26

2

25

.04

19

.69

1

6/1

/20

13

23:4

5

24

.82

3

18.5

76

24.1

95

18.2

91

26.1

34

20.3

84

20

.98

4

24

.82

3

44

.23

2

24

.895

19

.64

8

Page 100: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

86

Page 101: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

87

APPENDIX B

TEMPERATURE DATA FOR THREE COOLEST DAYS

Page 102: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

88

Tab

le B

Tem

per

ature

dat

a fo

r th

ree

coole

st d

ays

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

:30

16

.72

5

15.5

2

18.2

47

15.7

51

20.6

5

17.9

21

12

.96

8

17

.27

2

43

.65

2

18

.08

1

17

.22

4

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

:45

16

.67

7

15.4

89

18.2

24

15.6

78

20.6

27

17.9

12

.53

4

17

.22

5

44

.12

7

18

.08

1

17

.22

4

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

:00

16

.63

15.4

47

18.1

76

15.6

15

20.6

03

17.8

89

12

.14

7

17

.15

3

43

.75

6

18

.05

7

17

.20

3

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

:15

16

.58

2

15.4

05

18.1

05

15.5

41

20.5

55

17.8

68

12

.34

17

.13

43

.59

3

18

.01

17

.19

3

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

:30

16

.55

8

15.3

84

18.0

57

15.5

31

20.4

84

17.8

26

12

.67

8

17

.08

2

43

.83

17

.98

6

17

.17

2

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

:45

16

.51

1

15.3

73

18.0

33

15.4

89

20.4

36

17.8

15

12

.70

3

17

.03

4

44

.24

7

17

.91

5

17

.15

1

5/1

5/2

01

3 3

:00

16

.46

3

15.3

63

17.9

62

15.4

57

20.4

12

17.7

83

12

.58

2

16

.98

7

44

.06

8

17

.86

7

17

.13

5/1

5/2

01

3 3

:15

16

.41

5

15.3

31

17.9

38

15.4

57

20.3

41

17.7

62

12

.50

9

16

.93

9

44

.24

7

17

.84

3

17

.11

9

5/1

5/2

01

3 3

:30

16

.36

8

15.3

31

17.8

67

15

.426

20.2

93

17.7

31

12

.58

2

16

.89

2

44

.08

3

17

.81

9

17

.10

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 3

:45

16

.32

15.3

42

17.8

19

15.4

36

20.2

46

17.7

2

12

.48

5

16

.86

8

44

.26

2

17

.79

6

17

.09

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 4

:00

16

.27

2

15.3

31

17.7

72

15.4

47

20.2

69

17.7

2

12

.31

6

16

.82

44

.23

2

17

.77

2

17

.09

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 4

:15

16

.24

9

15.3

17.7

48

15.4

47

20.2

46

17.7

1

12

.12

2

16

.79

6

44

.06

8

17

.74

8

17

.09

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 4

:30

16

.20

1

15.2

68

17.7

24

15.4

78

20.2

22

17.6

88

11

.92

9

16

.74

9

44

.06

8

17

.72

4

17

.09

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 4

:45

16

.15

3

15.2

68

17.7

01

15.4

68

20.1

5

17.6

78

11

.73

4

16

.70

1

43

.68

2

17

.70

1

17

.09

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 5

:00

16

.10

6

15.2

47

17.7

01

15.4

36

20.1

26

17.6

78

11

.63

7

16

.65

4

44

.03

8

17

.67

7

17

.09

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 5

:15

16

.05

8

15.2

26

17.6

53

15.4

15

20.1

03

17.6

78

11

.92

9

16

.60

6

44

.11

3

17

.65

3

17

.08

7

Page 103: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

89

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

5/2

01

3 6

:45

15

.93

9

15.3

42

17.8

43

15.7

3

20.1

74

17.7

62

12

.63

16

.58

2

42

.55

6

17

.65

3

17

.11

9

5/1

5/2

01

3 7

:00

15

.96

3

15.3

84

17.9

38

15.8

04

20.2

46

17.8

78

12

.63

16

.67

7

41

.3

17

.70

1

17

.14

5/1

5/2

01

3 7

:15

16

.05

8

15.5

62

18.0

81

15.9

3

20.6

27

18.2

48

12

.92

16

.89

2

41

.03

3

17

.74

8

17

.18

2

5/1

5/2

01

3 7

:30

16

.17

7

15.7

2

18.2

47

16.0

98

21.1

03

18.3

01

13

.06

4

17

.08

2

41

.47

17

.86

7

17

.23

5

5/1

5/2

01

3 7

:45

16

.29

6

15.8

57

18.4

14

16.1

82

21.3

18

18.3

01

13

.01

6

17

.22

5

41

.16

17

.96

2

17

.29

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 8

:00

16

.41

5

15.9

62

18.5

09

16.1

93

21.3

18

18.3

75

12

.50

9

17

.43

9

40

.74

18

.05

7

17

.33

5/1

5/2

01

3 8

:15

16

.58

2

16.1

19

18.6

28

16.2

45

21.5

33

18.5

87

12

.82

3

17

.70

1

39

.8

18

.15

2

17

.37

2

5/1

5/2

01

3 8

:30

16

.82

16.3

51

18.8

42

16.4

45

21.8

67

18.7

03

13

.13

7

18

.08

1

39

.09

3

18

.31

9

17

.45

6

5/1

5/2

01

3 8

:45

16

.96

3

16.4

45

19.0

8

16.6

35

21.7

48

18.6

93

13

.40

1

18

.22

4

39

.89

6

18

.48

5

17

.54

1

5/1

5/2

01

3 9

:00

17

.13

16.6

45

19.3

18

16.8

66

21.8

43

18.8

31

13

.66

6

18

.50

9

38

.78

3

18

.69

9

17

.64

6

5/1

5/2

01

3 9

:15

17

.39

1

16.9

19

19.6

03

17.1

4

22.0

82

19.1

59

13

.81

18

.93

7

35

.16

7

18

.91

3

17

.74

1

5/1

5/2

01

3 9

:30

17

.62

9

17.0

98

19.7

93

17.2

14

22.3

21

19.1

38

13

.81

19

.38

9

37

.28

6

19

.10

3

17

.81

5

5/1

5/2

01

3 9

:45

17

.84

3

17.2

24

19.9

6

17.2

67

22.4

17

19.2

23

13

.71

4

19

.55

5

34

.96

5

19

.24

6

17

.86

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

0:0

0

18

.12

9

17.4

88

20.1

74

17.4

67

22.7

29

19.7

44

14

.07

4

20

.34

1

32

.39

19

.43

6

17

.96

3

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

0:1

5

18

.53

3

17.9

74

20.4

12

17.7

41

23.4

24

20.1

92

14

.74

5

22

.77

6

23

.30

6

19

.60

3

18

.06

9

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

0:3

0

18

.98

5

18.0

26

20.5

55

17.5

83

23.6

65

19.8

93

14

.36

1

22

.22

6

36

.94

7

19

.84

1

18

.12

1

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

0:4

5

19

.15

1

17.9

42

20.5

79

17.5

83

23.5

21

19.8

4

14

.57

7

21

.58

1

37

.37

7

19

.91

2

18

.15

3

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

1:0

0

19

.34

1

18.1

95

20.8

41

17.8

78

23.4

48

20.1

6

14

.93

6

22

.10

6

18

.02

6

20

.03

1

18

.23

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

1:1

5

19

.93

6

19.8

08

21.0

79

18.1

85

23.8

09

20.5

98

15

.55

7

25

.13

7

18

.24

8

20

.19

8

18

.37

5

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

1:3

0

21

.58

1

22.3

94

21.5

33

18.7

03

24.2

91

21.8

43

16

.48

7

26

.23

1

8.1

43

20

.53

1

18

.61

9

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

1:4

5

22

.96

8

21.9

83

21.9

63

18.7

35

24.7

74

21.2

4

16

.51

1

27

.28

4

40

.54

5

20

.96

18

.76

7

Page 104: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

90

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

2:0

0

22

.39

3

20.3

62

22.0

58

18.5

34

24.6

53

20.8

54

16

.12

9

25

.35

5

40

.57

3

21

.05

6

18

.76

7

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

2:1

5

22

.20

2

19.7

44

22.1

78

18.5

23

24.5

57

20.8

01

16

.10

6

24

.65

3

37

.43

21

.17

5

18

.78

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

2:3

0

21

.93

9

19.0

32

22.2

98

18.5

02

24.3

63

20.5

44

15

.79

6

24

.02

6

41

.58

3

21

.24

6

18

.80

9

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

2:4

5

21

.74

8

18.8

62

22.7

05

18.6

4

24.2

19

20.5

55

15

.89

1

23

.61

7

38

.15

5

21

.53

3

18

.90

5

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

3:0

0

21

.72

4

18.7

99

22.7

05

18.5

66

24.1

46

20.4

69

15

.84

3

23

.54

5

40

.25

4

21

.60

4

18

.90

5

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

3:1

5

21

.55

7

18.5

45

22.7

76

18.3

65

24.0

98

20.3

73

15

.74

8

23

.13

6

39

.05

3

21

.62

8

18

.88

4

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

3:3

0

21

.34

2

18.2

06

22.4

89

18.2

38

24.0

02

20.1

6

15

.79

6

22

.82

4

42

.59

9

21

.41

3

18

.80

9

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

3:4

5

21

.05

6

18.0

05

22.7

53

18.5

55

23.8

33

20.1

17

15

.58

1

22

.34

5

41

.21

6

21

.60

4

18

.89

4

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

4:0

0

21

.03

2

18.1

95

23.1

12

18.8

52

23.8

57

20.2

24

15

.91

5

22

.27

4

41

.42

7

21

.98

7

19

.07

5

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

4:1

5

21

.03

2

18.4

49

23.4

97

19.3

29

23.9

05

20.4

59

15

.84

3

22

.22

6

35

.30

6

22

.39

3

19

.24

4

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

4:3

0

21

.55

7

19.2

13

26.0

61

20.7

79

24.5

08

21.1

01

16

.43

9

22

.75

3

38

.86

4

25

.89

20

.042

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

4:4

5

21

.93

9

19.2

87

26.6

95

20.4

37

25.0

89

21.1

01

16

.86

8

22

.99

2

40

.15

7

25

.89

20

.46

9

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

5:0

0

21

.74

8

18.5

98

24.8

47

19.4

04

24.9

19

20.7

69

15

.50

9

22

.77

6

39

.99

2

24

.09

8

20

.12

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

5:1

5

21

.50

9

18.2

59

24.5

81

19.6

27

24.7

02

20.7

58

15

.24

7

22

.60

9

38

.28

8

23

.93

20

.04

2

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

5:3

0

21

.48

5

18.2

91

25.7

2

20.0

64

24.7

02

20.8

33

15

.43

8

22

.58

5

39

.73

2

24

.75

20

.27

7

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

5:4

5

21

.67

6

18.7

88

29.8

4

22.8

05

25.0

16

21.3

48

16

.17

7

22

.60

9

40

.36

5

28

.22

1

21

.06

9

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

6:0

0

21

.86

7

18.9

79

31.2

04

24.7

63

25.5

5

21.7

78

16

.65

4

22

.70

5

41

.3

29

.94

1

22

.97

9

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

6:1

5

21

.91

5

18.9

58

33.6

78

25.8

39

25.9

39

21.9

29

17

.08

2

22

.72

9

41

.79

6

30

.39

4

23

.86

2

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

6:3

0

21

.89

1

18.8

52

37.8

38

25.8

5

26.2

31

21.9

94

17

.58

2

22

.70

5

41

.92

4

30

.46

9

24

.80

8

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

6:4

5

21

.79

5

18.6

51

37.1

51

23.6

33

26.2

56

21.7

57

17

.15

3

22

.65

7

42

.03

9

29

.66

5

23

.98

3

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

7:0

0

21

.67

6

18.5

13

36.4

44

22.4

04

26.1

09

21.7

89

17

.24

9

22

.53

7

42

.80

2

28

.81

6

23

.88

4

Page 105: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

91

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

7:1

5

21

.55

7

18.3

44

32.3

3

21.2

94

25.8

41

21.5

09

17

.20

1

22

.36

9

42

.97

7

27

.94

9

22

.49

1

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

7:3

0

21

.43

7

18.2

91

30.2

68

20.6

72

25.6

47

21.3

59

17

.13

22

.27

4

42

.18

2

27

.23

5

21

.66

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

7:4

5

21

.29

4

18.1

43

28.5

43

19.9

25

25.3

31

21.0

9

16

.58

2

22

.08

2

43

.00

6

26

.45

1

21

.03

7

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

8:0

0

21

.12

7

17.9

52

27.1

86

19.3

82

25.0

65

20.8

65

16

.17

7

21

.89

1

42

.90

4

25

.79

3

20

.54

4

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

8:1

5

20

.93

6

17.7

41

25.9

14

18.7

56

24.7

74

20.5

76

15

.79

6

21

.65

2

43

.43

1

25

.13

7

20

.08

5

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

8:3

0

20

.67

4

17.4

98

24.8

47

18.2

69

24.4

84

20.2

88

15

.53

3

21

.36

6

43

.90

4

24

.50

8

19

.69

1

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

8:4

5

20

.41

2

17.1

72

24.0

74

18.0

26

24.0

98

20.0

74

14

.98

4

21

.10

3

43

.50

5

23

.95

4

19

.37

2

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

9:0

0

20

.10

3

16.5

29

23.5

69

17.8

47

23.7

85

19.8

83

14

.40

9

20

.77

42

.67

2

23

.47

2

19

.11

7

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

9:1

5

19

.81

7

16.4

03

23.2

08

17.7

73

23.5

21

19.6

8

14

.48

1

20

.50

7

43

.47

5

23

.08

8

18

.92

6

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

9:3

0

19

.60

3

16.4

24

22.7

29

17.4

98

23.2

32

19.4

46

14

.69

7

20

.22

2

43

.77

1

22

.68

1

18

.72

5

5/1

5/2

01

3 1

9:4

5

19

.36

5

16.4

24

22.2

74

17.3

3

22.9

68

19.2

44

14

.67

3

19

.98

4

43

.97

8

22

.27

4

18

.54

5

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

0:0

0

19

.19

9

16.4

14

21.8

91

17.1

51

22.7

53

19.0

96

14

.79

2

19

.79

3

44

.23

2

21

.93

9

18

.39

6

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

0:1

5

19

.03

2

16.3

72

21.5

09

16.9

93

22.5

61

18.9

47

14

.84

19

.60

3

44

.20

2

21

.62

8

18

.26

9

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

0:3

0

18

.88

9

16.3

19

21.1

51

16.8

56

22.3

69

18.8

41

14

.84

19

.46

44

.23

2

21

.31

8

18

.16

4

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

0:4

5

18

.74

7

16.2

98

20.8

65

16.7

61

22.2

26

18.7

56

14

.60

1

19

.31

8

44

.26

2

21

.05

6

18

.09

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

1:0

0

18

.62

8

16.2

45

20.6

03

16.6

56

22.0

82

18.6

72

14

.55

3

19

.22

2

44

.24

7

20

.86

5

18

.02

6

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

1:1

5

18

.53

3

16.1

61

20.3

41

16.5

4

21.9

63

18.5

87

13

.90

6

19

.08

44

.24

7

20

.65

17

.96

3

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

1:3

0

18

.41

4

16.0

77

20.1

26

16.4

24

21.8

43

18.5

13

13

.64

2

18

.96

1

44

.24

7

20

.46

17

.9

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

1:4

5

18

.29

5

15.9

83

19.9

12

16.3

72

21.7

24

18.4

49

13

.35

3

18

.81

8

44

.24

7

20

.29

3

17

.83

6

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

2:0

0

18

.17

6

15.9

09

19.7

46

16.3

19

21.5

81

18.3

75

13

.49

7

18

.69

9

44

.26

2

20

.10

3

17

.77

3

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

2:1

5

18

.08

1

15.8

46

19.6

03

16.2

56

21.4

85

18.3

22

13

.35

3

18

.60

4

44

.17

2

19

.96

17

.71

Page 106: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

92

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

2:3

0

17

.96

2

15.7

72

19.4

36

16.1

82

21.3

9

18.2

8

13

.01

6

18

.46

1

44

.24

7

19

.81

7

17

.65

7

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

2:4

5

17

.84

3

15.7

2

19.3

41

16.1

72

21.2

94

18.2

27

12

.92

18

.36

6

44

.27

7

19

.67

4

17

.60

4

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

3:0

0

17

.77

2

15.6

78

19.2

22

16.1

51

21.1

99

18.1

85

13

.16

1

18

.27

1

44

.06

8

19

.55

5

17

.55

1

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

3:1

5

17

.67

7

15.6

36

19.1

03

16.1

19

21.1

51

18.1

43

13

.37

7

18

.17

6

43

.69

6

19

.43

6

17

.52

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

3:3

0

17

.60

5

15.6

15

18.9

85

16.0

35

21.0

79

18.1

13

.20

9

18

.08

1

44

.06

8

19

.31

8

17

.47

7

5/1

5/2

01

3 2

3:4

5

17

.53

4

15.5

73

18.8

89

15.9

93

21.0

08

18.0

58

13

.23

3

17

.98

6

44

.26

2

19

.22

2

17

.44

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 0

:00

17

.43

9

15.4

57

18.7

94

15.9

62

20.9

36

18.0

16

13

.35

3

17

.89

1

43

.60

8

19

.12

7

17

.41

4

5/1

6/2

01

3 0

:15

17

.39

1

15.4

26

18.6

99

15.8

99

20.8

41

17.9

95

13

.30

5

17

.81

9

44

.21

7

19

.03

2

17

.37

2

5/1

6/2

01

3 0

:30

17

.32

15.3

84

18.6

28

15.9

41

20.7

93

17.9

63

13

.13

7

17

.72

4

43

.60

8

18

.91

3

17

.34

5/1

6/2

01

3 0

:45

17

.24

9

15.3

84

18.5

57

15.8

88

20.7

46

17.9

31

13

.04

17

.65

3

43

.87

4

18

.81

8

17

.29

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

:00

17

.20

1

15.3

31

18.4

85

15.8

88

20.6

98

17.9

1

13

.11

2

17

.58

2

44

.20

2

18

.72

3

17

.27

7

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

:15

17

.10

6

15.2

58

18.4

14

15.8

57

20.6

74

17.8

68

12

.99

2

17

.48

6

43

.85

9

18

.62

8

17

.23

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

:30

17

.05

8

15.2

47

18.3

43

15.8

04

20.6

5

17.8

57

12

.82

3

17

.39

1

44

.06

8

18

.55

7

17

.20

3

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

:45

16

.98

7

15.2

05

18.2

71

15.7

83

20.5

55

17.8

26

12

.65

4

17

.32

43

.8

18

.46

1

17

.18

2

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

:00

16

.89

2

15.1

18.2

24

15.7

51

20.5

31

17.7

94

12

.67

8

17

.22

5

44

.24

7

18

.39

17

.16

1

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

:15

16

.82

15.0

69

18.1

52

15.7

41

20.4

12

17.7

62

12

.58

2

17

.13

43

.81

5

18

.31

9

17

.13

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

:30

16

.74

9

15.0

37

18.0

81

15.7

09

20.3

41

17.7

41

12

.58

2

17

.05

8

43

.84

5

18

.24

7

17

.10

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

:45

16

.70

1

15.0

27

18.0

1

15.6

88

20.3

17

17.7

2

12

.53

4

16

.98

7

43

.62

3

18

.15

2

17

.07

7

5/1

6/2

01

3 3

:00

16

.63

14.9

74

17.9

38

15.6

36

20.2

93

17.7

1

12

.14

7

16

.89

2

44

.06

8

18

.10

5

17

.04

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 3

:15

16

.55

8

14.9

22

17.8

91

15.5

73

20

.246

17.6

78

12

.19

5

16

.82

43

.38

7

18

.01

17

.02

4

5/1

6/2

01

3 3

:30

16

.48

7

14.9

22

17.8

19

15.5

52

20.2

22

17.6

57

12

.26

8

16

.72

5

43

.90

4

17

.93

8

16

.99

3

Page 107: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

93

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

6/2

01

3 3

:45

16

.41

5

14.8

8

17.7

72

15.5

1

20.1

5

17.6

36

12

.19

5

16

.65

4

44

.24

7

17

.86

7

16

.96

1

5/1

6/2

01

3 4

:00

16

.34

4

14.8

27

17.7

01

15.4

68

20.1

5

17.6

04

12

.17

1

16

.60

6

44

.00

8

17

.77

2

16

.92

9

5/1

6/2

01

3 4

:15

16

.29

6

14.8

38

17.6

29

15.4

47

20.1

03

17.5

83

12

.07

4

16

.53

4

44

.03

8

17

.72

4

16

.90

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 4

:30

16

.24

9

14.8

48

17.5

82

15.4

05

20.0

31

17.5

72

12

.14

7

16

.46

3

44

.00

8

17

.62

9

16

.87

7

5/1

6/2

01

3 4

:45

16

.20

1

14.8

27

17.5

1

15.3

21

19.9

84

17.5

41

12

.05

16

.41

5

43

.44

6

17

.55

8

16

.85

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 5

:00

16

.12

9

14.7

75

17.4

39

15.3

21

19.9

36

17.5

2

11

.95

3

16

.34

4

44

.26

2

17.4

86

16

.83

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 5

:15

16

.08

2

14.7

75

17.3

68

15.3

19.8

88

17.4

88

11

.85

6

16

.29

6

44

.14

2

17

.41

5

16

.80

3

5/1

6/2

01

3 5

:30

16

.05

8

14.7

75

17.3

2

15.2

68

19.8

65

17.4

77

11

.85

6

16

.24

9

44

.08

3

17

.34

4

16

.78

2

5/1

6/2

01

3 5

:45

15

.98

6

14.7

44

17.2

49

15.2

37

19.8

41

17.4

67

11

.73

4

16

.20

1

43

.65

2

17

.27

2

16

.75

5/1

6/2

01

3 6

:00

15

.93

9

14.7

75

17.2

25

15.2

05

19.8

41

17.4

77

11

.56

5

16

.15

3

43

.65

2

17

.22

5

16

.72

9

5/1

6/2

01

3 6

:15

15

.91

5

14.8

59

17.1

77

15.1

95

19.8

65

17.4

88

11

.83

2

16

.17

7

43

.29

9

17

.15

3

16

.70

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 6

:30

15

.93

9

15.0

06

17.1

77

15

.226

19.8

65

17.5

09

12

.02

5

16

.24

9

42

.91

9

17

.10

6

16

.70

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 6

:45

16

.01

15.1

63

17.1

77

15.2

79

19.8

88

17.5

3

12

.38

9

16

.34

4

42

.64

3

17

.05

8

16

.70

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 7

:00

16

.08

2

15.2

79

17.1

77

15.3

21

19.9

36

17.5

72

12

.36

4

16

.46

3

42

.58

5

17

.05

8

16

.71

9

5/1

6/2

01

3 7

:15

16.2

01

15.4

05

17.2

25

15.3

84

20.4

12

18.7

35

12

.41

3

16

.58

2

42

.78

8

17

.05

8

16

.74

5/1

6/2

01

3 7

:30

16

.32

15.5

73

17.2

72

15.4

47

22.2

26

19.3

51

12

.67

8

16

.77

3

42

.45

5

17

.08

2

16

.77

1

5/1

6/2

01

3 7

:45

16

.46

3

15.7

41

17.3

2

15.5

1

23.1

84

18.7

67

12

.31

6

16

.98

7

42

.16

7

17

.13

16

.81

4

5/1

6/2

01

3 8

:00

16

.63

15.8

99

17.4

15

15.6

04

23.2

56

19.3

29

12

.50

9

17

.22

5

41

.59

7

17

.15

3

16

.84

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 8

:15

16

.82

16.0

98

17.5

34

15.7

51

23.6

65

19.5

42

12

.72

7

17

.51

41

.68

2

17

.22

5

16

.88

7

5/1

6/2

01

3 8

:30

17

.05

8

16.3

09

17.6

77

15.9

3

23.9

54

19.2

23

12

.79

9

17

.81

9

41

.01

9

17

.27

2

16

.94

5/1

6/2

01

3 8

:45

17

.29

6

16.5

4

17.8

19

16.1

4

24.7

26

19.8

83

13

.42

5

18

.15

2

41

.18

8

17

.36

8

16

.99

3

Page 108: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

94

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

6/2

01

3 9

:00

17

.58

2

16.8

03

18.0

33

16.3

82

25.5

5

20.2

88

14

.05

18

.55

7

40

.51

7

17

.46

3

17

.04

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 9

:15

17

.86

7

17.0

56

18.2

24

16.6

24

25.4

53

20.7

69

13

.97

8

19

.17

5

35

.00

3

17

.62

9

17

.13

5/1

6/2

01

3 9

:30

18

.22

4

17.3

51

18.4

61

16.8

66

25.2

1

20.3

84

14

.76

8

21

.89

1

8.1

64

17

.77

2

17

.22

4

5/1

6/2

01

3 9

:45

18

.62

8

17.6

57

18.7

23

17.1

08

25.4

04

21.6

6

15

.05

5

24

.09

8

28

.66

8

17

.96

2

17

.31

9

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

0:0

0

19

.10

3

17.9

74

18.9

85

17.3

4

25.3

55

21.4

45

15

.24

7

24

.72

6

29

.5

18

.15

2

17

.43

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

0:1

5

19

.65

1

18.2

91

19.2

46

17.5

62

25.7

44

21.1

12

15

.72

4

27

.18

6

27

.91

2

18

.36

6

17

.56

2

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

0:3

0

20

.19

8

18.5

76

19.5

08

17.6

88

25.7

44

22.1

99

16

.03

4

29

.46

4

8.0

89

18

.58

17

.68

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

0:4

5

20

.79

3

18.9

05

19.7

7

17.8

78

25.5

01

21.7

57

16

.24

9

31

.15

3

8.0

89

18

.81

8

17

.83

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

1:0

0

21

.43

7

19.3

08

20.0

31

18.0

47

25.4

53

21.8

97

16

.70

1

32

.04

7

20

.34

1

19

.08

17

.99

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

1:1

5

22

.17

8

21.3

05

20.3

41

18.3

65

25.5

5

21.9

18

17

.29

6

31

.61

2

16

.64

5

19

.36

5

18

.19

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

1:3

0

23

.83

3

23.5

45

20.6

74

18.5

55

25.7

93

22.8

27

17

.36

8

31

.30

6

8.0

89

19

.69

8

18

.38

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

1:4

5

25

.74

4

24.6

31

21.0

56

18.8

2

26.0

36

22.8

49

18

.10

5

32

.87

2

8.1

2

0.1

26

18

.59

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

2:0

0

27

.18

6

25.1

39

21.5

09

19.1

91

26.3

04

22.5

23

18

.17

6

34

.83

6

8.1

2

0.6

03

18

.83

1

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

2:1

5

28

.07

2

25.3

94

21.8

91

19.3

4

26.5

98

22.6

86

18

.36

6

35

.23

5

8.1

21

21

.05

6

19

.03

2

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

2:3

0

28

.49

3

25.2

83

22.4

17

19.6

27

26.8

67

22.8

81

18

.62

8

34

.62

4

8.0

89

21

.53

3

19

.20

2

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

2:4

5

28

.81

6

25.0

18

22.6

57

19.8

08

27.1

36

23.0

33

18

.41

4

33

.36

5

24

.46

6

21

.89

1

19

.36

1

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

3:0

0

28

.69

2

24.3

12

22.8

48

19.7

97

27.2

1

22.9

46

18

.50

9

32

.15

32

.29

3

22

.15

4

19

.44

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

3:1

5

28

.54

3

23

.393

23.1

36

19.8

19

27.2

84

22.8

38

18

.84

2

31

.45

9

37

.22

22

.48

9

19

.58

4

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

3:3

0

27

.94

9

22.0

15

23.0

4

19.3

29

27.0

14

22.4

37

18

.29

5

30

.39

4

40

.22

6

22

.46

5

19

.47

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

3:4

5

27

.89

9

22.7

84

23.5

69

20.1

81

27.1

12

23.0

23

19

.69

8

30

.04

1

36

.06

9

23

.23

2

19

.96

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

4:0

0

27

.57

9

21.8

23.7

13

19.7

97

27.1

36

22.5

67

18

.98

5

29

.54

39

.40

5

23

.66

5

20

Page 109: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

95

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

4:1

5

27

.35

8

21.8

64

24.5

81

20.5

76

27.1

36

22.7

4

19

.57

9

29

.09

37

.85

1

25.7

2

20

.39

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

4:3

0

27

.28

4

21.6

7

25.7

44

20.8

44

27.3

08

22.6

86

19

.79

3

28

.81

6

39

.06

6

26

.35

3

20

.73

7

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

4:4

5

26

.91

6

21.2

51

26.0

36

20.6

72

27.1

36

22.4

48

19

.60

3

28

.29

5

40

.65

6

25

.81

7

20

.79

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

5:0

0

26

.64

6

21.1

76

28.3

45

21.4

98

27.0

63

22.5

45

19

.88

8

27

.80

1

41

.04

7

26

.45

1

21

.15

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

5:1

5

26

.64

6

21.4

45

31.2

55

23.1

2

27.3

08

22.9

36

20

.48

4

27

.50

5

41

.03

3

30

.26

8

22

.27

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

5:3

0

26

.72

21.6

38

34.5

45

24.6

31

27.7

51

23.1

97

21

.12

7

27

.38

2

41

.37

1

32

.79

4

23

.6

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

5:4

5

26

.62

2

21.4

98

34.9

42

24.5

87

28.0

72

23.1

86

20

.67

4

27

.23

5

40

.53

1

32

.35

5

23

.6

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

6:0

0

26

.52

4

21.4

02

34.1

76

24.7

52

28.3

45

23.2

95

21

.19

9

27

.18

6

40

.18

5

32

.76

8

24

.42

2

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

6:1

5

26

.25

6

20.9

4

33.4

17

23.8

73

28.3

69

23.0

12

20

.98

4

27

.01

4

42

.57

1

32

.04

7

24

.32

3

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

6:3

0

25

.96

3

20.6

83

34.7

83

23.6

55

28.0

48

22.8

92

20

.77

26

.79

3

41

.64

31

.43

3

24

.16

9

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

6:4

5

25

.76

8

20.7

05

41.5

6

24.8

63

28.0

48

23.2

4

21

.55

7

26

.69

5

40

.67

31

.28

1

25

.37

2

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

7:0

0

25

.64

7

20.6

08

40.8

33

23.6

44

28.2

21

23.2

29

21

.53

3

26

.67

1

41

.64

30

.92

5

25

.25

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

7:1

5

25

.40

4

20.2

66

35.2

88

22.9

03

28.1

47

23.0

01

21

.36

6

26

.42

6

42

.23

9

30

.21

7

23

.96

1

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

7:3

0

25

.13

7

20

32.8

2

22.0

69

27.8

01

22.7

4

21

.22

3

26

.08

5

42

.44

1

29

.43

9

22

.83

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

7:4

5

24

.89

5

19.7

87

31.0

52

21.3

8

27.6

04

22.4

91

21

.05

6

25

.86

6

43

.15

2

28

.74

2

22

.11

3

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

8:0

0

24

.65

3

19.6

27

29.6

4

21.1

98

27.3

08

22.3

61

21

.07

9

25

.57

4

42

.84

6

28

.07

2

21

.60

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

8:1

5

24

.41

2

19.4

89

28.4

93

20.5

98

27.0

63

22.1

88

21

.05

6

25

.35

5

43

.00

6

27

.45

6

21

.18

7

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

8:3

0

24

.19

5

19.3

61

27.5

3

20.1

7

26

.793

21.9

72

20

.96

25

.11

3

43

.18

1

26

.89

1

20

.83

3

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

8:4

5

23

.97

8

19.2

44

26.7

2

19.8

4

26.4

75

21.7

24

20

.93

6

24

.84

7

43

.29

9

26

.35

3

20

.53

3

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

9:0

0

23

.78

5

19.1

06

26.0

85

19.5

53

26.1

34

21.4

55

20

.57

9

24

.60

5

43

.43

1

25

.84

1

20

.26

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

9:1

5

23

.56

9

18.9

68

25.5

01

19.2

87

25.8

66

21.2

19

20

.10

3

24

.38

8

43

.60

8

25

.40

4

20

.03

2

Page 110: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

96

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

9:3

0

23

.32

8

18.7

99

24.9

68

19.0

96

25.5

74

20.9

83

19

.79

3

24

.14

6

43

.65

2

24

.96

8

19

.81

9

5/1

6/2

01

3 1

9:4

5

23

.11

2

18.5

98

24.4

84

18.8

31

25.2

58

20.7

47

19

.36

5

23

.85

7

44

.05

3

24

.58

1

19

.61

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

0:0

0

22

.84

8

18.3

96

24.0

26

18.5

87

25.0

16

20.5

33

19

.00

8

23

.56

9

44

.12

7

24

.19

5

19

.43

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

0:1

5

22

.60

9

18.1

32

23.5

93

18.3

96

24.8

23

20.3

52

18

.46

1

23

.28

44

.17

2

23

.83

3

19

.27

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

0:3

0

22

.34

5

17.9

1

23.2

32

18.1

85

24.6

05

20.1

81

18

.01

23

.06

4

44

.15

7

23

.49

7

19

.12

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

0:4

5

22

.10

6

17.7

1

22.8

72

18.0

37

24.3

63

20

17

.67

7

22

.82

4

44

.21

7

23

.20

8

19

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

1:0

0

21

.86

7

17.5

41

22.5

37

17.9

1

24.0

98

19.8

29

17

.46

3

22

.58

5

44

.23

2

22

.92

18

.87

3

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

1:1

5

21

.67

6

17.4

25

22.2

5

17.8

15

23.8

33

19.6

8

17

.34

4

22

.34

5

44

.23

2

22

.65

7

18

.76

7

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

1:3

0

21

.46

1

17.3

09

22.0

11

17.7

31

23.5

69

19.5

31

17

.32

22

.15

4

44

.18

7

22

.44

1

18

.66

1

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

1:4

5

21

.27

17.2

14

21.7

72

17.6

57

23.3

28

19.4

04

17

.22

5

21

.96

3

44

.17

2

22

.25

18

.57

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

2:0

0

21

.15

1

17.1

82

21.5

57

17.5

51

23.0

88

19.2

87

17

.27

2

21

.77

2

44

.18

7

22

.03

4

18

.51

3

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

2:1

5

21

.03

2

17.1

61

21.3

66

17.4

56

22.9

44

19.2

02

17

.34

4

21

.65

2

44

.21

7

21

.84

3

18

.44

9

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

2:3

0

20

.88

9

17.0

98

21.1

99

17.4

67

22.8

48

19.1

17

17

.24

9

21

.50

9

44

.17

2

21

.7

18

.38

6

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

2:4

5

20

.74

6

17.0

24

21.0

56

17.4

25

22.7

53

19.0

43

17

.27

2

21

.34

2

44

.21

7

21

.53

3

18

.32

2

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

3:0

0

20

.60

3

16.9

5

20.9

36

17.4

04

22.6

09

18.9

79

17

.22

5

21

.22

3

44

.23

2

21

.39

18

.28

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

3:1

5

20

.48

4

16.8

77

20.8

41

17.3

4

22.4

89

18.9

15

16

.91

5

21

.07

9

44

.23

2

21

.27

18

.23

8

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

3:3

0

20

.36

5

16.8

66

20.7

22

17.2

88

22.3

69

18.8

52

16

.74

9

20

.93

6

44

.18

7

21

.12

7

18

.18

5

5/1

6/2

01

3 2

3:4

5

20

.26

9

16.8

35

20.6

03

17.2

24

22.2

74

18.7

99

16

.77

3

20

.84

1

44

.17

2

21

.00

8

18

.14

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 0

:00

20

.19

8

21.6

7

25.7

44

20.8

44

27.3

08

22.6

86

19

.79

3

28

.81

6

39

.06

6

26

.35

3

20

.73

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 0

:15

20

.10

3

21.2

51

26.0

36

20.6

72

27.1

36

22.4

48

19

.60

3

28

.29

5

40

.65

6

25

.81

7

20

.79

5/1

7/2

01

3 0

:30

20

.00

7

21.1

76

28.3

45

21.4

98

27.0

63

22.5

45

19

.88

8

27

.80

1

41

.04

7

26

.45

1

21

.15

5

Page 111: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

97

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

7/2

01

3 0

:45

19

.91

2

21.4

45

31.2

55

23.1

2

27.3

08

22.9

36

20

.48

4

27

.50

5

41

.03

3

30

.26

8

22

.27

5

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

:00

19

.81

7

21.6

38

34.5

45

24.6

31

27.7

51

23.1

97

21

.12

7

27

.38

2

41

.37

1

32

.79

4

23

.6

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

:15

19

.74

6

21.4

98

34.9

42

24.5

87

28.0

72

23.1

86

20

.67

4

27

.23

5

40

.53

1

32

.35

5

23

.6

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

:30

19

.65

1

21.4

02

34.1

76

24.7

52

28.3

45

23.2

95

21

.19

9

27

.18

6

40

.18

5

32

.76

8

24

.422

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

:45

19

.57

9

20.9

4

33.4

17

23.8

73

28.3

69

23.0

12

20

.98

4

27

.01

4

42

.57

1

32

.04

7

24

.32

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

:00

19

.50

8

20.6

83

34.7

83

23.6

55

28.0

48

22.8

92

20

.77

26

.79

3

41

.64

31

.43

3

24

.16

9

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

:15

19

.41

3

20.7

05

41.5

6

24.8

63

28.0

48

23.2

4

21

.55

7

26

.69

5

40

.67

31

.28

1

25

.37

2

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

:30

19

.34

1

20.6

08

40.8

33

23.6

44

28.2

21

23.2

29

21

.53

3

26

.67

1

41

.64

30

.92

5

25

.25

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

:45

19

.27

20.2

66

35.2

88

22.9

03

28.1

47

23.0

01

21

.36

6

26

.42

6

42

.23

9

30

.21

7

23

.96

1

5/1

7/2

01

3 3

:00

19

.19

9

20

32.8

2

22.0

69

27.8

01

22.7

4

21

.22

3

26

.08

5

42

.44

1

29

.43

9

22

.83

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 3

:15

19

.15

1

19.7

87

31.0

52

21.3

8

27.6

04

22.4

91

21

.05

6

25

.86

6

43

.15

2

28

.74

2

22

.11

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 3

:30

19

.10

3

19.6

27

29.6

4

21.1

98

27.3

08

22.3

61

21

.07

9

25

.57

4

42

.84

6

28

.07

2

21

.60

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 3

:45

19

.08

19.4

89

28.4

93

20.5

98

27.0

63

22.1

88

21

.05

6

25

.35

5

43

.00

6

27

.45

6

21

.18

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 4

:00

19

.03

2

19.3

61

27.5

3

20.1

7

26.7

93

21.9

72

20

.96

25

.11

3

43

.18

1

26

.89

1

20

.83

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 4

:15

19

.00

8

19.2

44

26.7

2

19.8

4

26.4

75

21.7

24

20

.93

6

24

.84

7

43

.29

9

26

.35

3

20

.53

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 4

:30

18

.96

1

19.1

06

26.0

85

19.5

53

26.1

34

21.4

55

20

.57

9

24

.60

5

43

.43

1

25

.84

1

20

.26

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 4

:45

18

.93

7

18.9

68

25.5

01

19.2

87

25.8

66

21.2

19

20

.10

3

24

.38

8

43

.60

8

25

.40

4

20

.03

2

5/1

7/2

01

3 5

:00

18

.91

3

18.7

99

24.9

68

19.0

96

25.5

74

20.9

83

19

.79

3

24

.14

6

43

.65

2

24

.96

8

19

.81

9

5/1

7/2

01

3 5

:15

18

.88

9

18.5

98

24.4

84

18.8

31

25.2

58

20.7

47

19

.36

5

23

.85

7

44

.05

3

24

.58

1

19

.61

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 5

:30

18

.86

6

18.3

96

24.0

26

18.5

87

25.0

16

20.5

33

19

.00

8

23

.56

9

44

.12

7

24

.19

5

19

.43

6

Page 112: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

98

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

7/2

01

3 5

:45

18

.81

8

18.1

32

23.5

93

18.3

96

24.8

23

20.3

52

18

.46

1

23

.28

44

.17

2

23

.83

3

19

.27

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 6

:00

18

.77

1

17.9

1

23.2

32

18.1

85

24.6

05

20.1

81

18

.01

23

.06

4

44

.15

7

23

.49

7

19

.12

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 6

:15

18

.72

3

17.7

1

22.8

72

18.0

37

24.3

63

20

17

.67

7

22

.82

4

44

.21

7

23

.20

8

19

5/1

7/2

01

3 6

:30

18

.67

5

17.5

41

22.5

37

17.9

1

24.0

98

19.8

29

17

.46

3

22

.58

5

44

.23

2

22

.92

18

.87

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 6

:45

18

.65

2

17.4

25

22.2

5

17.8

15

23.8

33

19.6

8

17

.34

4

22

.34

5

44

.23

2

22

.65

7

18

.76

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 7

:00

18

.67

5

17.3

09

22.0

11

17.7

31

23.5

69

19.5

31

17

.32

22

.15

4

44

.18

7

22

.44

1

18

.66

1

5/1

7/2

01

3 7

:15

18

.72

3

17.2

14

21.7

72

17.6

57

23.3

28

19.4

04

17

.22

5

21

.96

3

44

.17

2

22

.25

18

.57

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 7

:30

18

.81

8

17.1

82

21.5

57

17.5

51

23.0

88

19.2

87

17

.27

2

21

.77

2

44

.18

7

22

.03

4

18

.51

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 7

:45

18

.96

1

17.1

61

21.3

66

17.4

56

22.9

44

19.2

02

17

.34

4

21

.65

2

44

.21

7

21

.84

3

18

.44

9

5/1

7/2

01

3 8

:00

19

.10

3

17.0

98

21.1

99

17.4

67

22.8

48

19.1

17

17

.24

9

21

.50

9

44

.17

2

21

.7

18

.38

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 8

:15

19

.27

17.0

24

21.0

56

17.4

25

22.7

53

19.0

43

17

.27

2

21

.34

2

44

.21

7

21

.53

3

18

.32

2

5/1

7/2

01

3 8

:30

19

.43

6

16.9

5

20.9

36

17.4

04

22.6

09

18.9

79

17

.22

5

21

.22

3

44

.23

2

21

.39

18

.28

5/1

7/2

01

3 8

:45

19

.62

7

16.8

77

20.8

41

17.3

4

22.4

89

18.9

15

16

.91

5

21

.07

9

44

.23

2

21

.27

18

.23

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 9

:00

19

.79

3

16.8

66

20.7

22

17.2

88

22.3

69

18.8

52

16

.74

9

20

.93

6

44

.18

7

21

.12

7

18

.18

5

5/1

7/2

01

3 9

:15

19

.91

2

16.8

35

20.6

03

17.2

24

22.2

74

18.7

99

16

.77

3

20

.84

1

44

.17

2

21

.00

8

18

.14

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 9

:30

20

.03

1

16.7

92

20.5

07

17.2

14

22.1

54

18.7

56

16

.72

5

20

.74

6

44

.21

7

20

.88

9

18

.1

5/1

7/2

01

3 9

:45

20

.07

9

16.7

61

20.4

12

17.1

93

22.0

82

18.7

14

16

.17

7

20

.65

44

.23

2

20

.79

3

18

.06

9

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

0:0

0

20

.19

8

16.6

77

20.3

17

17.1

19

21.9

87

18.6

61

16

.20

1

20

.53

1

44

.20

2

20

.69

8

18

.02

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

0:1

5

20

.38

8

16.6

56

20.2

22

17.1

3

21.9

15

18.6

29

16

.34

4

20

.43

6

44

.26

2

20

.57

9

17

.98

4

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

0:3

0

20

.72

2

16.5

93

20.1

5

17.0

66

21.8

19

18.5

87

16

.27

2

20

.31

7

44

.20

2

20

.48

4

17

.95

2

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

0:4

5

20

.98

4

16.5

61

20.0

55

17.0

24

21.7

48

18.5

55

16

.24

9

20

.22

2

44

.20

2

20

.38

8

17

.91

Page 113: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

99

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

1:0

0

21

.41

3

16.4

98

19.9

6

16.9

08

21.7

24

18.5

23

16

.01

20

.12

6

44

.24

7

20

.29

3

17

.86

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

1:1

5

21

.89

1

16.4

56

19.8

65

16.8

98

21.6

52

18.4

92

15

.91

5

20

.03

1

44

.26

2

20

.17

4

17

.82

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

1:3

0

22

.53

7

16.4

24

19.7

7

16.7

92

21.6

04

18.4

6

15

.81

9

19

.93

6

44

.26

2

20.0

79

17

.78

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

1:4

5

23

.68

9

16.3

72

19.6

74

16.7

5

21.5

57

18.4

28

15

.77

2

19

.84

1

44

.20

2

19

.98

4

17

.75

2

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

2:0

0

25

.13

7

16.3

61

19.6

03

16.7

08

21.5

09

18.4

07

15

.7

19

.74

6

44

.24

7

19

.88

8

17

.71

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

2:1

5

25

.81

7

16.2

98

19.5

08

16.6

87

21.4

85

18.3

75

15

.65

2

19

.65

1

44

.20

2

19

.81

7

17

.67

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

2:3

0

25

.64

7

16.2

98

19.4

6

16.6

66

21.4

61

18.3

65

15

.7

19

.57

9

44

.18

7

19

.72

2

17

.66

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

2:4

5

25

.67

1

16.3

19

19.4

13

16.7

08

21.4

13

18.3

54

15

.86

7

19

.50

8

44

.20

2

19

.67

4

17

.65

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

3:0

0

25

.91

4

16.3

61

19.3

89

16.7

4

21.3

9

18.3

44

15

.77

2

19

.43

6

44

.26

2

19

.62

7

17

.64

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

3:1

5

26

.45

1

16.3

72

19.3

65

16.8

03

21.3

42

18.3

33

15

.89

1

19

.38

9

44

.18

7

19

.57

9

17

.65

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

3:3

0

27

.03

8

16.3

82

19.3

65

16.8

24

21.3

18

18.3

33

15

.79

6

19

.34

1

44

.18

7

19

.55

5

17

.65

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

3:4

5

27

.50

5

16.4

03

19.3

65

16.8

56

21.2

94

18.3

22

15

.91

5

19

.29

4

44

.20

2

19

.53

2

17

.66

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

4:0

0

27

.82

5

16.4

14

19.3

65

16.8

35

21.2

7

18.3

22

15

.60

5

19

.27

44

.23

2

19

.50

8

17

.67

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

4:1

5

27

.82

5

16.4

45

19.3

41

16.8

66

21.2

46

18.3

22

15

.65

2

19

.22

2

44

.21

7

19

.50

8

17

.67

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

4:3

0

27

.97

4

16.4

45

19.3

41

16.8

56

21.2

23

18.3

12

15

.84

3

19

.22

2

44

.26

2

19

.48

4

17

.67

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

4:4

5

28

.09

7

16.4

24

19.3

41

16.8

35

21.2

46

18.3

12

15

.91

5

19

.17

5

44

.21

7

19

.43

6

17

.66

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

5:0

0

28

.09

7

16.4

14

19.3

18

16.8

03

21.1

99

18.2

91

15

.79

6

19

.15

1

44

.23

2

19

.43

6

17

.65

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

5:1

5

27

.85

16.3

51

19.2

7

16.7

61

21.1

75

18.2

8

14

.88

8

19

.10

3

44

.12

7

19

.38

9

17

.63

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

5:3

0

27

.35

8

16.3

4

19.2

46

16.7

29

21.1

75

18.2

69

15

.00

8

19

.05

6

44

.12

7

19

.31

8

17

.61

5

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

5:4

5

27

.08

7

16.3

3

19.2

22

16.7

19

21.1

51

18.2

69

15

.46

1

19

.00

8

43

.87

4

19

.27

17

.59

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

6:0

0

26

.76

9

16.3

19

19.2

22

16.6

98

21.1

27

18.2

8

14

.55

3

18

.98

5

43

.74

1

19

.22

2

17

.57

2

Page 114: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

100

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

6:1

5

26

.5

16.4

24

19.2

94

16.8

03

21.1

75

18.3

65

14

.55

3

19

.03

2

42

.26

8

19

.24

6

17

.60

4

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

6:3

0

26

.28

16.5

61

19.4

6

16.9

61

21.3

42

18.5

13

14

.84

19

.15

1

41

.92

4

19

.29

4

17

.65

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

6:4

5

26

.15

8

16.6

87

19.5

79

17.0

66

21.4

61

18.5

87

15

.65

2

19

.29

4

42

.26

8

19

.36

5

17

.68

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

7:0

0

25

.91

4

16.8

66

19.7

7

17.2

56

21.5

81

18.6

72

15

.98

6

19

.41

3

40

.90

7

19

.46

17

.77

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

7:1

5

25

.69

5

17.0

77

19.9

84

17.4

25

21.6

76

18.7

35

16

.05

8

19

.65

1

41

.24

4

19

.60

3

17

.84

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

7:3

0

25

.47

7

17.2

67

20.1

74

17.5

72

21.8

67

18.9

26

16

.082

19

.84

1

40

.02

19

.74

6

17

.93

1

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

7:4

5

25

.23

4

17.4

46

20.3

65

17.7

2

22.1

78

19.0

11

16

.01

20

.07

9

40

.87

9

19

.93

6

18

.02

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

8:0

0

24

.96

8

17.5

93

20.6

27

17.8

68

22.3

21

19.1

49

16

.08

2

20

.29

3

40

.03

4

20

.12

6

18

.11

1

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

8:1

5

24

.72

6

17.7

62

20.8

41

18.0

9

22.5

61

19.4

14

16

.48

7

20

.55

5

38

.94

5

20

.31

7

18

.20

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

8:3

0

24

.48

4

17.8

47

21.0

08

18.1

53

22.7

29

19.3

29

16

.51

1

20

.69

8

38

.98

5

20

.46

18

.28

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

8:4

5

24

.24

3

17.8

68

21.1

51

18.2

17

22.7

76

19.3

51

16

.55

8

20

.81

7

41

.03

3

20

.60

3

18

.34

4

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

9:0

0

24

.02

6

17.8

68

21.2

94

18.2

48

22.8

24

19.3

72

16

.89

2

20

.86

5

41

.08

9

20

.72

2

18

.38

6

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

9:1

5

23

.80

9

17.8

47

21.3

18

18.2

59

22.8

19.3

61

16

.77

3

20

.84

1

41

.35

7

20

.79

3

18

.41

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

9:3

0

23

.61

7

18.0

37

21.5

57

18.4

18

22.8

72

19.4

99

17

.01

1

21

.00

8

38

.60

9

20

.98

4

18

.50

2

5/1

7/2

01

3 1

9:4

5

23

.4

18.2

69

21.8

91

18.6

72

23.0

4

19.6

7

16

.91

5

21

.29

4

38

.23

5

21

.22

3

18

.61

9

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

0:0

0

23

.20

8

18.7

35

22.2

5

19.0

22

23.3

76

19.9

89

17

.58

2

22

.01

1

34

.66

4

21

.50

9

18

.76

7

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

0:1

5

23

.06

4

18.8

2

22.4

65

19.0

96

23.5

93

19.9

78

17

.67

7

22

.13

38

.23

5

21

.7

18

.87

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

0:3

0

22

.92

19.4

25

22.8

96

19.4

99

23.9

3

20.4

27

18

.2

23

.23

2

32

.72

9

22

.03

4

19

.06

4

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

0:4

5

22

.8

19.8

61

23.2

8

19.7

65

24.2

67

20.6

19

18

.74

7

23

.73

7

29

.18

7

22

.34

5

19

.24

4

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

1:0

0

22

.68

1

20.5

76

23.6

89

19.9

36

24.6

29

20.9

72

19

.12

7

24

.55

7

25

.57

2

22

.68

1

19

.42

5

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

1:1

5

22

.56

1

21.8

64

23.8

09

19.9

57

25.0

65

21.3

91

19

.31

8

26

.18

2

8.1

53

22

.89

6

19

.56

3

Page 115: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

101

Tab

le B

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L1

1

DL

15

D

L1

6

Da

te

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

°C

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

1:3

0

22

.44

1

23.2

4

23.9

3

20.1

38

25.4

28

21.6

06

19

.91

2

28

.61

7

8.1

32

23

.13

6

19

.72

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

1:4

5

22

.32

1

23.0

33

24.3

63

20.3

73

25.8

41

21.7

89

20

.29

3

28

.74

2

30

.93

1

23

.52

1

19

.89

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

2:0

0

22

.22

6

22.1

34

24.8

47

20.5

12

26.0

61

21.8

20

.22

2

27

.62

8

33

.48

6

23

.88

1

20

.03

2

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

2:1

5

22

.13

21.9

4

25.1

62

20.6

19

26.2

07

21.9

18

20

.12

6

27

.45

6

33

.60

9

24

.17

1

20

.17

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

2:3

0

22

.03

4

22.3

39

25.3

55

20.6

83

26.3

78

22.0

8

20

.50

7

27

.62

8

33

.25

3

24

.46

20

.29

8

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

2:4

5

21

.91

5

23.0

23

25.4

77

21.0

37

26.6

71

22.4

37

20

.98

4

27

.97

4

32

.51

1

24.8

23

20

.53

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

3:0

0

21

.84

3

23.2

29

25.6

47

21.1

22

27.0

14

22.6

64

21

.17

5

28

.39

4

34

.41

4

25

.45

3

20

.79

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

3:1

5

21

.74

8

23.3

71

25.9

63

21.4

12

27.3

82

22.9

03

21

.74

8

28

.74

2

35

.86

5

26

.06

1

21

.12

2

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

3:3

0

21

.65

2

23.1

42

26.4

75

21.5

31

27.7

02

22.9

9

22

.08

2

28

.96

5

38

.23

5

27

.08

7

21

.42

3

5/1

7/2

01

3 2

3:4

5

21

.58

1

22.6

32

26.9

16

21.5

74

27.8

75

22.8

92

21

.77

2

28

.89

1

36

.67

4

27

.57

9

21

.56

3

Page 116: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

102

Page 117: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

103

APPENDIX C

HUMIDITY DATA FOR THREE HOTTEST DAYS

Page 118: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

104

Tab

le C

Hum

idit

y d

ata

for

thre

e hott

est

day

s

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/8

/2013 1

:45

39.5

58

47.9

2

37.3

05

50.4

98

41

.92

6

39

.38

4

6/8

/2013 2

:00

39.4

52

47.9

76

37.6

4

49.4

5

42

.08

4

39

.50

8

6/8

/2013 2

:15

39.4

09

48.1

25

37.9

7

48.9

22

42

.20

9

39

.69

3

6/8

/2013 2

:30

39.5

32

48.2

5

38.3

01

49.4

31

42

.39

8

40

.04

5

6/8

/2013 2

:45

39.7

2

48.4

02

38.4

98

50.0

08

42

.55

6

40

.13

7

6/8

/2013 3

:00

40.1

34

48.6

21

38.7

65

51.2

19

42

.74

7

40

.45

8

6/8

/2013 3

:15

40.1

58

48.7

08

38.9

3

51.3

94

42

.93

5

40

.61

3

6/8

/2013 3

:30

40.1

16

48.9

26

39.0

92

51.5

61

43

.09

40

.70

5

6/8

/2013 3

:45

40.1

4

49.0

77

39.2

88

51.4

47

43

.28

40

.73

6/8

/2013 4

:00

40.6

53

49.2

31

39.4

19

51.3

53

43

.43

7

40

.85

4

6/8

/2013 4

:15

40.6

13

49.2

89

39.4

81

51.4

22

43

.59

4

41

.00

9

6/8

/2013 4

:30

40.7

05

49.5

38

39.5

47

52.2

01

43

.75

41

.45

8

6/8

/2013 4

:45

40.6

02

49.5

92

39.6

74

53.0

16

43

.94

41

.51

5

6/8

/2013 5

:00

41.1

46

49.6

79

39.8

41

53.2

55

44

.09

6

41

.92

8

6/8

/2013 5

:15

41.3

35

49.9

53

39.8

38

54.4

96

44

.25

4

42

.14

6

6/8

/2013 5

:30

41.5

21

50.1

66

40.0

02

55.4

8

44

.44

3

42

.33

2

Page 119: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

105

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/8

/2013 7

:00

43.4

52

51.4

82

40.3

83

55.8

38

45

.17

7

43

.62

1

6/8

/2013 7

:15

43.4

6

51.4

82

40.3

83

55.2

31

45

.38

7

43

.84

6/8

/2013 7

:30

43.4

39

51.6

01

39.9

27

54.4

75

45

.44

43

.96

3

6/8

/2013 7

:45

43.3

56

51.7

62

37.1

09

53.8

69

45

.4

44

.15

3

6/8

/2013 8

:00

43.3

06

51.9

22

35.1

35

53.4

09

45

.25

9

44

.22

6/8

/2013 8

:15

43

52.0

86

34.7

12

52.0

27

45

.41

5

44

.31

6

6/8

/2013 8

:30

42.5

7

52.1

93

34.7

26

50.7

14

45

.77

1

44

.32

2

6/8

/2013 8

:45

42.1

38

52.0

62

34.3

42

50.1

07

45

.54

44

.10

6

6/8

/2013 9

:00

41.7

73

51.8

67

33.4

13

50.7

49

45

.34

5

44

.24

3

6/8

/2013 9

:15

41.3

81

51.6

75

32.6

51

49.4

65

45

.05

3

43

.83

9

6/8

/2013 9

:30

40.8

59

51.4

86

31.9

3

46.8

76

44

.44

4

43

.30

3

6/8

/2013 9

:45

40.3

08

51.2

02

30.8

45.3

25

43

.56

42

.93

3

6/8

/2013 1

0:0

0

39.7

94

50.7

09

30.5

95

45.5

28

40

.34

42

.41

1

6/8

/2013 1

0:1

5

38.9

59

50.2

4

29.9

29

44.9

81

38

.50

3

42

.21

1

6/8

/2013 1

0:3

0

38.5

81

50.1

28

29.7

63

44.4

25

38

.83

42

.16

6/8

/2013 1

0:4

5

37.8

96

49.5

02

30.9

73

42.6

27

36

.56

3

41

.86

2

6/8

/2013 1

1:0

0

36.9

34

49.1

09

31.3

2

42.2

01

36

.64

4

41

.55

9

6/8

/2013 1

1:1

5

36.3

73

48.4

6

32.0

72

41.7

18

34

.80

3

40

.94

6/8

/2013 1

1:3

0

35.9

17

48.3

74

32.2

12

41.1

07

36

.41

7

41

.13

3

Page 120: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

106

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/8

/2013 1

2:1

5

32.4

98

46.2

15

31.8

91

39.9

99

34

.23

39

.27

9

6/8

/2013 1

2:3

0

31.5

81

45.8

94

30.9

89

38.2

31

33

.31

4

38

.88

5

6/8

/2013 1

2:4

5

29.6

87

45.2

24

30.1

21

34.9

02

32

.46

37

.87

3

6/8

/2013 1

3:0

0

28.4

67

44.1

88

29.3

95

33.9

05

32

.08

8

36

.14

8

6/8

/2013 1

3:1

5

28.5

36

43.6

25

28.5

77

33.9

42

32

.74

9

35

.28

5

6/8

/2013 1

3:3

0

27.7

96

43.3

13

27.5

29

32.7

67

32

.59

8

35

.10

7

6/8

/2013 1

3:4

5

26.8

28

42.5

19

26.8

55

28.8

42

31

.69

1

33

.46

4

6/8

/2013 1

4:0

0

26.1

25

41.3

03

25.9

77

29.2

01

31

.41

5

32

.26

6/8

/2013 1

4:1

5

25.6

56

40.6

66

25.1

99

29.6

36

31

.13

4

27

.71

6

6/8

/2013 1

4:3

0

25.0

4

38.8

32

24.5

62

26.3

64

30

.48

3

23

.83

8

6/8

/2013 1

4:4

5

24.9

35

37.8

57

23.9

18

28.3

39

30

.65

3

26

.81

9

6/8

/2013 1

5:0

0

24.6

85

35.2

71

23.9

73

27.9

25

30

.49

1

24

.51

6/8

/2013 1

5:1

5

24.8

52

32.4

21

23.5

29

27.6

1

30

.68

8

22

.44

4

6/8

/2013 1

5:3

0

24.9

51

32.6

41

23.0

84

26.4

57

30

.89

5

23

.19

6/8

/2013 1

5:4

5

24.9

04

31.1

35

22.8

25.0

32

30

.88

20

.81

3

6/8

/2013 1

6:0

0

26.3

62

32.6

65

22.8

02

37.6

36

32

.34

5

24

.34

4

6/8

/2013 1

6:1

5

27.0

98

33.8

53

23.2

98

35.8

82

33

.10

6

23

.66

6/8

/2013 1

6:3

0

27.6

01

30.6

59

24.0

99

36.5

37

33

.59

7

23

.17

9

6/8

/2013 1

6:4

5

28.2

66

29.1

7

24.8

47

34.5

94

34

.13

4

24

6/8

/2013 1

7:0

0

28.6

88

28.6

86

25.6

56

32.6

79

34

.52

7

24

.79

3

6/8

/2013 1

7:1

5

29.2

15

30.9

95

26.3

79

34.0

07

34

.92

7

25

.92

2

Page 121: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

107

Tab

le C

(C

on

tin

ued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/8

/2013 1

7:3

0

29.5

68

32.4

14

26.9

44

35.3

58

35

.25

2

27

.30

9

6/8

/2013 1

7:4

5

29.9

54

33.7

49

27.7

12

33.6

28

35

.50

4

28

.42

8

6/8

/2013 1

8:0

0

30.1

38

35.1

21

28.2

64

33.0

64

35

.75

5

29

.41

1

6/8

/2013 1

8:1

5

30.4

95

36.1

7

28.7

46

34.0

05

36

.08

2

30

.05

6

6/8

/2013 1

8:3

0

30.7

5

37.2

42

29.1

23

34.0

91

36

.34

1

30

.83

6

6/8

/2013 1

8:4

5

31.1

71

38.3

46

29.3

57

34.6

26

36

.66

6

31

.54

7

6/8

/2013 1

9:0

0

31.5

94

39.2

28

29.7

01

35.4

89

37

.16

3

31

.99

3

6/8

/2013 1

9:1

5

32.1

52

39.7

71

29.8

26

35.9

37

37

.55

7

32

.44

3

6/8

/2013 1

9:3

0

32.6

07

40.7

4

30.2

42

37.1

35

37

.95

1

33

.42

1

6/8

/2013 1

9:4

5

33.1

92

40.9

95

30.7

97

41.4

56

38

.54

3

33

.79

3

6/8

/2013 2

0:0

0

33.6

41

41.0

86

31.2

08

43.9

53

38

.89

5

33

.97

6/8

/2013 2

0:1

5

35.0

25

42.5

29

31.5

49

53.1

98

38

.80

6

34

.27

8

6/8

/2013 2

0:3

0

37.3

3

44.5

72

31.5

26

51.9

75

39

.73

5

35

.51

2

6/8

/2013 2

0:4

5

37.6

31

45.6

4

32.6

57

56.3

61

40

.32

36

.43

9

6/8

/2013 2

1:0

0

38.2

69

46.3

51

33.7

76

57.3

09

40

.76

7

37

.23

4

6/8

/2013 2

1:1

5

39.0

04

47.0

99

35.0

32

60

.106

41

.54

9

38

.3

6/8

/2013 2

1:3

0

39.4

74

47.3

6

35.8

78

57.3

09

42

.26

39

.13

6/8

/2013 2

1:4

5

40.3

05

48.2

34

36.7

92

60.3

01

42

.90

6

39

.79

7

6/8

/2013 2

2:0

0

41.2

67

48.9

86

37.4

29

62.2

05

43

.28

4

40

.59

4

6/8

/2013 2

2:1

5

41.8

34

49.8

63

38.1

06

62.4

83

43

.85

9

41

.19

6

Page 122: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

108

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/8

/2013 2

2:3

0

42.5

93

50.3

91

38.5

38

65.2

18

44

.46

3

42

.02

7

6/8

/2013 2

2:4

5

43.4

42

51.1

07

39.1

76

66.2

65

45

.29

6

42

.53

6

6/8

/2013 2

3:0

0

43.7

78

51.4

11

39.6

71

61.9

17

45

.53

6

42

.97

6

6/8

/2013 2

3:1

5

43.8

26

51.3

7

40.2

32

58.6

14

45

.81

3

43

.28

9

6/8

/2013 2

3:3

0

43.6

48

51.3

6

40.6

89

57.4

21

45

.89

7

43

.40

7

6/8

/2013 2

3:4

5

43.6

02

51.3

79

40.8

84

56.1

27

46

.04

3

43

.52

3

6/9

/2013 0

:00

43.5

23

51.4

61

40.9

41

54.5

6

46

.29

43

.57

9

6/9

/2013 0

:15

43.4

8

51.1

64

41.1

56

50.7

64

46

.24

6

43.5

65

6/9

/2013 0

:30

43.2

84

50.9

64

41.3

39

51.1

36

46

.13

9

43

.26

6

6/9

/2013 0

:45

42.7

23

50.8

62

41.3

63

49.3

04

46

.13

1

43

.03

1

6/9

/2013 1

:00

42.4

3

50.7

61

41.3

16

47.4

19

45

.99

5

42

.7

6/9

/2013 1

:15

42.1

98

50.8

21

41.2

15

46.8

31

45

.82

6

42

.69

7

6/9

/2013 1

:30

42.8

44

50.7

2

41.0

14

52.6

84

45

.72

2

42

.55

9

6/9

/2013 1

:45

42.7

74

50.9

04

40.8

07

54.9

42

45

.84

7

42

.71

6

6/9

/2013 2

:00

43.6

11

51.3

69

40.8

69

57.6

37

46

.06

9

43

.06

3

6/9

/2013 2

:15

43.8

95

51.7

07

40.9

64

58.4

98

46

.22

7

43

.44

5

6/9

/2013 2

:30

44.3

08

51.9

21

41.1

3

62.1

95

46

.41

3

43

.69

2

6/9

/2013 2

:45

44.7

17

52.2

54

41.4

24

65.0

91

46

.62

9

43

.93

8

6/9

/2013 3

:00

44.9

94

52.3

7

41.7

18

65.6

41

46

.84

4

44

.05

6

6/9

/2013 3

:15

44.9

85

52.4

58

42.0

44

63.7

1

47

.02

7

44

.04

5

6/9

/2013 3

:30

44.8

17

52.5

77

42.1

73

63.6

78

47

.14

5

43

.97

2

Page 123: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

109

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/9

/2013 3

:45

44.0

32

52.7

58

42.3

65

58.9

17

47

.36

2

43

.86

4

6/9

/2013 4

:00

44.3

77

52.8

77

42.4

93

57.2

45

47

.51

2

43

.94

9

6/9

/2013 4

:15

44.4

03

53.1

83

42.4

95

56.8

72

47

.73

2

44

.13

4

6/9

/2013 4

:30

45.0

01

53.1

73

42.6

85

56.7

58

47

.81

9

44

.15

5

6/9

/2013 4

:45

44.4

82

53.4

75

42.8

15

55.8

6

48

.00

1

44

.53

2

6/9

/2013 5

:00

44.5

41

53.6

24

42.8

12

55.4

54

48

.12

3

44

.74

7

6/9

/2013 5

:15

44.6

31

53.7

11

43.0

06

56.4

28

48

.27

5

44

.99

5

6/9

/2013 5

:30

44.7

86

53.9

22

43.0

37

57.3

79

48

.49

45

.11

5

6/9

/2013 5

:45

45.3

18

53.9

81

43.1

34

57.3

49

48

.54

8

45

.17

3

6/9

/2013 6

:00

45.0

54

54.1

36

43.0

98

57.0

49

48

.67

45

.39

1

6/9

/2013 6

:15

45.2

08

54.1

98

43.1

64

56.9

39

48

.67

45

.41

7

6/9

/2013 6

:30

45.3

36

54.0

84

43.0

65

56.0

11

48

.79

8

45

.54

5

6/9

/2013 6

:45

45.4

54.0

32

42.9

4

57.3

14

48

.93

2

45

.67

3

6/9

/2013 7

:00

45.4

05

53.9

18

42.7

82

57.0

54

48

.97

1

45

.64

4

6/9

/2013 7

:15

45.3

42

53.8

62

42.7

51

58.3

02

49

.13

45

.74

2

6/9

/2013 7

:30

45.6

99

53.7

82

42.7

51

57.4

14

49

.25

8

45

.71

6

6/9

/2013 7

:45

46.4

99

53.6

46

42.5

93

58.8

35

49

.27

45

.62

9

6/9

/2013 8

:00

45.9

37

53.3

64

42.4

7

58.5

26

48

.97

5

45

.38

8

6/9

/2013 8

:15

46.5

89

53.0

25

42.1

24

58.9

09

48

.78

1

45

.24

8

6/9

/2013 8

:30

46.7

4

52.7

47

41.8

75

59.6

67

48

.68

45

.04

7

6/9

/2013 8

:45

46.6

94

52.4

94

41.5

67

58.7

7

48

.73

6

44

.81

3

Page 124: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

110

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Da

te

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/9

/2013 9

:00

46.5

21

52.2

68

41.4

84

58.6

73

48

.47

7

44

.73

4

6/9

/2013 9

:15

46.5

38

51.9

53

41.1

35

60.5

76

48

.43

4

44

.53

4

6/9

/2013 9

:30

46.3

39

51.6

08

41.0

52

60.3

93

48

.22

4

44

.3

6/9

/2013 9

:45

46.2

25

51.7

44

40.4

47

60.0

04

48

.02

5

44

.67

7

6/9

/2013 1

0:0

0

45.8

27

51.8

11

40.3

64

59.1

46

47

.14

1

44

.71

2

6/9

/2013 1

0:1

5

44.9

66

51.7

25

39.5

13

55.6

72

42

.91

44

.84

7

6/9

/2013 1

0:3

0

44.0

8

51.6

75

36.2

58

52.5

47

39

.80

2

44

.82

3

6/9

/2013 1

0:4

5

43.0

71

51.4

43

35.2

07

51.5

21

37

.58

6

44

.61

5

6/9

/2013 1

1:0

0

42.1

54

51.2

43

34.2

17

50.9

29

36

.04

6

44

.6

6/9

/2013 1

1:1

5

40.9

07

50.9

41

34.4

19

48.7

41

34

.21

1

44

.58

5

6/9

/2013 1

1:3

0

39.6

93

50.5

83

34.5

83

46.5

94

33

.12

4

44

.38

2

6/9

/2013 1

1:4

5

36.6

47

50.2

24

34.5

15

44.5

21

33

.84

43

.95

8

6/9

/2013 1

2:0

0

34.7

13

49.7

16

34.3

77

43.2

19

34

.24

1

43

.40

4

6/9

/2013 1

2:1

5

33.6

47

49.2

64

34.0

43

42.9

63

33

.42

3

42

.91

5

6/9

/2013 1

2:3

0

32.4

86

48.5

66

33.6

03

41.7

04

32

.60

9

41

.94

5

6/9

/2013 1

2:4

5

30.9

85

47.5

94

33.0

97

39.4

15

32

.54

2

40

.79

2

6/9

/2013 1

3:0

0

30.2

62

46.9

33

32.4

2

39.1

9

32

.67

6

39

.66

6/9

/2013 1

3:1

5

29.7

18

46.3

05

31.5

97

39.7

97

32

.88

9

38

.96

8

6/9

/2013 1

3:3

0

29.5

1

45.6

28

31.1

09

41.8

18

33

.27

5

38

.09

3

6/9

/2013 1

3:4

5

29.4

81

45.4

53

30.8

23

41.7

58

33

.71

4

38

.00

7

6/9

/2013 1

4:0

0

30.9

26

45.9

27

30.9

47

54.7

92

35

.14

7

38

.76

5

Page 125: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

111

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/9

/2013 1

4:1

5

31.7

57

45.4

93

31.4

73

50.2

48

35

.96

1

39

.07

5

6/9

/2013 1

4:3

0

33.8

51

45.7

45

32.3

18

55.5

58

37

.92

9

38

.06

4

6/9

/2013 1

4:4

5

33.5

82

45.0

98

32.9

7

50.4

94

37

.82

3

38

.54

8

6/9

/2013 1

5:0

0

33.4

38

42.2

76

33.2

5

48.5

38

37

.87

2

34

.07

9

6/9

/2013 1

5:1

5

33.1

81

38.6

42

33.3

32

50.2

83

37

.74

6

31

.40

1

6/9

/2013 1

5:3

0

33.5

39

38.4

61

32.9

47

48.3

78

38

.20

1

29

.72

1

6/9

/2013 1

5:4

5

33.4

79

38.3

83

32.8

2

47.5

73

38

.30

6

28

.91

7

6/9

/2013 1

6:0

0

33.8

6

36.6

77

32.8

16

46.3

4

38

.61

8

28

.06

7

6/9

/2013 1

6:1

5

34.0

35

36.6

83

32.8

49

48.1

62

38

.96

6

28

6/9

/2013 1

6:3

0

34.6

43

34.8

78

32.8

12

49.7

7

39

.37

4

28

.57

8

6/9

/2013 1

6:4

5

34.9

76

34.8

04

32.8

03

50.4

19

39

.84

5

29

.53

8

6/9

/2013 1

7:0

0

35.0

78

35.2

7

33.0

66

49.8

91

39

.91

2

30

.50

4

6/9

/2013 1

7:1

5

35.3

81

35.8

98

33.3

96

46.7

5

40

.28

6

31

.07

9

6/9

/2013 1

7:3

0

35.7

51

36.9

42

33.6

6

46.3

76

40

.55

8

32

.04

2

6/9

/2013 1

7:4

5

36.4

53

37.7

58

33.7

81

46.3

41

41

.03

7

32

.74

1

6/9

/2013 1

8:0

0

36.7

39.1

44

34.0

4

46.0

24

41

.35

6

33

.27

6

6/9

/2013 1

8:1

5

36.8

82

39.7

71

34.1

72

43.5

59

41

.54

34

.01

5

6/9

/2013 1

8:3

0

37.0

63

40.4

56

34.0

99

43.7

78

41

.65

3

34

.98

5

6/9

/2013 1

8:4

5

37.5

77

41.3

86

34.1

6

44.9

92

42

.04

35

.74

9

6/9

/2013 1

9:0

0

37.9

28

42.0

54

34.2

19

45.0

27

42

.25

9

36

.41

1

6/9

/2013 1

9:1

5

38.1

44

43.1

33

34.4

16

44.2

05

42

.47

9

37

.10

4

Page 126: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

112

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/9

/2013 1

9:3

0

37.9

95

43.6

4

34.7

81

43.2

08

42

.45

8

37

.66

2

6/9

/2013 1

9:4

5

38.2

08

43.6

18

35.1

44

44.3

09

42

.51

2

38

.12

6

6/9

/2013 2

0:0

0

38.5

85

43.6

35

35.5

35

44.9

09

42

.75

4

38

.71

8

6/9

/2013 2

0:1

5

39.1

58

44.6

17

35.8

59

48.5

23

43

.06

3

38

.91

8

6/9

/2013 2

0:3

0

39.5

99

45.3

02

36.2

08

47.8

25

43

.53

7

39

.38

3

6/9

/2013 2

0:4

5

39.4

85

45.1

31

36.6

29

45.6

92

43

.57

8

39

.91

5

6/9

/2013 2

1:0

0

39.6

66

45.7

19

37.0

81

47.2

56

43

.72

7

39

.99

6/9

/2013 2

1:1

5

40.1

46

46.3

73

37.4

67

50.2

93

44

.10

5

40

.13

3

6/9

/2013 2

1:3

0

40.5

57

47.0

94

37.7

2

51.3

32

44

.41

8

40

.57

2

6/9

/2013 2

1:4

5

40.9

37

47.8

47

37.8

44

51.5

9

44

.85

9

40

.81

5

6/9

/2013 2

2:0

0

41.2

51

48.2

77

37.9

76

51.1

36

44

.74

6

41

.05

7

6/9

/2013 2

2:1

5

41.4

68

48.7

06

38.1

35

50.6

54

44

.66

7

41

.17

2

6/9

/2013 2

2:3

0

41.2

9

49.0

09

38.2

94

50.8

01

44

.52

7

41

.48

1

6/9

/2013 2

2:4

5

41.6

71

49.3

13

38.6

88

52.7

16

44

.64

4

41

.72

7

6/9

/2013 2

3:0

0

42.0

14

49.8

72

39.1

73

54.0

98

44

.83

42

.45

9

6/9

/2013 2

3:1

5

42.3

59

50.1

4

39.5

34

54.4

21

45

.04

5

42

.86

6

6/9

/2013 2

3:3

0

42.5

72

50.7

24

39.7

61

55.9

11

45

.35

8

43

.37

2

6/9

/2013 2

3:4

5

42.9

81

51.1

51

40.1

49

56.3

84

45

.73

6

43

.97

1

6/1

0/2

013 0

:00

43.6

14

51.4

56

40.7

68

57.2

58

46

.11

3

44

.24

9

6/1

0/2

013 0

:15

43.3

42

51.7

55

41.1

56

57.2

35

46

.26

4

44

.43

1

6/1

0/2

013 0

:30

44.4

27

52.3

07

41.4

85

58.1

59

46

.70

6

44

.67

6

Page 127: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

113

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/1

0/2

013 0

:45

44.6

08

52.5

14

41.6

78

60.0

63

46

.91

8

45

.27

4

6/1

0/2

013 1

:00

44.7

25

52.8

45

42.0

66

60.1

65

47

.23

45

.35

6

6/1

0/2

013 1

:15

45.1

26

53.2

71

42.1

97

60.0

73

47

.41

2

45

.85

6

6/1

0/2

013 1

:30

45.2

14

53.6

42.3

89

59.9

19

47

.62

6

46

.00

7

6/1

0/2

013 1

:45

45.4

9

53.8

32

42.5

86

59.8

75

47

.87

4

46

.12

3

6/1

0/2

013 2

:00

46.0

26

54.1

01

42.6

83

60.5

83

48

.34

4

46

.49

4

6/1

0/2

013 2

:15

46.2

4

54.2

45

42.6

5

60.5

17

48

.52

1

46

.45

6/1

0/2

013 2

:30

46.3

59

54.3

86

42.8

08

59.2

96

48

.70

4

46

.62

9

6/1

0/2

013 2

:45

46.4

14

54.6

82

42.9

71

59.3

95

48

.91

9

46

.77

6

6/1

0/2

013 3

:00

46.4

97

54.9

76

43.0

96

59.4

21

49

.06

9

46

.92

6

6/1

0/2

013 3

:15

46.4

25

55.1

81

43.0

27

59.5

42

49

.28

47

.16

9

6/1

0/2

013 3

:30

46.5

11

55.3

85

43.1

24

60.3

65

49

.49

4

47

.28

4

6/1

0/2

013 3

:45

46.9

18

55.5

59

43.1

51

60.9

27

49

.70

7

47

.62

3

6/1

0/2

013 4

:00

47.0

65

55.7

32

43.3

09

60.9

17

49

.92

47

.70

6

6/1

0/2

013 4

:15

47.4

05

55.9

67

43.4

69

61.1

31

50

.13

3

47

.91

9

6/1

0/2

013 4

:30

47.7

78

56.1

39

43.5

63

61.4

03

50

.27

9

48

.12

8

6/1

0/2

013 4

:45

47.7

72

56.2

54

43.5

6

61.7

19

50

.52

2

48

.40

7

6/1

0/2

013 5

:00

47.9

85

56.4

27

43.7

2

62.3

17

50

.54

4

48

.42

6

6/1

0/2

013 5

:15

48.0

99

56.5

41

43.7

83

62.0

86

50

.81

9

48

.63

8

6/1

0/2

013 5

:30

48.2

79

56.6

83

43.9

07

61.5

51

51

.02

7

48

.91

5

6/1

0/2

013 5

:45

48.0

2

56.7

4

43.9

04

61.8

6

51

.11

2

48

.71

4

Page 128: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

114

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/1

0/2

013 6

:00

48.3

58

56.8

58

43.9

97

62.1

24

51

.29

7

48

.85

9

6/1

0/2

013 6

:15

48.5

47

56.9

22

43.9

31

61.9

2

51

.42

6

49

.07

3

6/1

0/2

013 6

:30

48.1

75

57.0

24

43.9

01

62.5

96

51

.43

5

49

.19

3

6/1

0/2

013 6

:45

48.6

86

56.9

67

43.9

34

64.6

78

51

.29

1

49

.19

6/1

0/2

013 7

:00

48.8

56

56.9

09

43.8

71

65.9

9

51

.18

1

49

.63

6/1

0/2

013 7

:15

48.8

37

56.8

83

43.8

71

65.4

04

51

.04

3

49

.65

8

6/1

0/2

013 7

:30

48.7

29

57.0

68

43.5

6

62.9

89

50

.81

3

49

.94

1

6/1

0/2

013 7

:45

48.4

95

57.0

45

40.1

66

61.1

37

50

.55

6

49

.78

4

6/1

0/2

013 8

:00

48.0

11

56.9

95

37.8

67

59.4

29

50

.33

1

49

.94

1

6/1

0/2

013 8

:15

47.5

89

57.1

57

37.4

13

59.0

14

50

.33

1

50

.04

4

6/1

0/2

013 8

:30

47.2

56.9

32

37.3

64

59.8

13

50

.23

8

49

.86

5

6/1

0/2

013 8

:45

46.7

47

56.7

47

36.6

38

59.7

65

49

.89

4

49

.59

2

6/1

0/2

013 9

:00

46.1

4

56.4

71

35.6

9

56.5

12

49

.42

49

.22

7

6/1

0/2

013 9

:15

45.3

03

56.2

34.6

93

54.8

18

48

.62

3

49

.01

9

6/1

0/2

013 9

:30

44.7

87

55.7

45

34.1

17

54.9

27

48

.21

5

48

.49

8

6/1

0/2

013 9

:45

44.2

43

55.3

21

32.7

63

53.2

35

47

.23

6

48

.19

8

6/1

0/2

013 1

0:0

0

43.8

32

54.8

31

32.5

57

50.6

73

43

.92

3

47

.96

6

6/1

0/2

013 1

0:1

5

43.0

34

54.4

31

31.8

99

50.1

96

39

.72

1

47

.639

6/1

0/2

013 1

0:3

0

42.4

53.7

84

30.8

9

48.2

05

37

.19

1

47

.18

4

6/1

0/2

013 1

0:4

5

41.1

21

53.3

53

31.0

97

46.2

26

34

.89

6

46

.89

6/1

0/2

013 1

1:0

0

39.9

93

52.7

34

30.9

41

44.5

04

33

.56

1

46

.34

6

Page 129: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

115

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/1

0/2

013 1

1:1

5

39.5

25

52.1

79

31.6

93

42.9

77

32

.38

7

45

.92

8

6/1

0/2

013 1

1:3

0

37.8

38

51.8

29

32.3

4

37.4

04

31

.13

9

45

.70

5

6/1

0/2

013 1

1:4

5

34.9

05

51.1

32.5

73

38.4

18

31

.96

8

45

.21

8

6/1

0/2

013 1

2:0

0

32.8

55

50.5

3

32.5

02

38.7

36

32

.31

6

44

.48

2

6/1

0/2

013 1

2:1

5

32.2

81

49.8

67

32.2

22

39.7

04

32

.07

1

43

.58

3

6/1

0/2

013 1

2:3

0

31.3

01

49.2

36

31.8

82

38.2

36

31

.58

9

42

.84

6

6/1

0/2

013 1

2:4

5

30.4

38

48.4

75

31.6

07

37.2

37

32

.13

7

41

.94

6

6/1

0/2

013 1

3:0

0

29.5

86

47.8

3

31.3

2

35.7

89

31

.93

9

41

.01

9

6/1

0/2

013 1

3:1

5

28.6

58

47.0

18

30.8

45

35.4

8

31

.93

8

39

.77

6/1

0/2

013 1

3:3

0

27.7

46.0

98

30.4

48

34.8

56

31

.68

6

38

.40

5

6/1

0/2

013 1

3:4

5

28.5

45

45.5

03

29.8

13

31.6

17

32

.78

2

37

.82

5

6/1

0/2

013 1

4:0

0

28.1

8

44.6

02

29.4

85

33.2

2

32

.91

1

36

.19

4

6/1

0/2

013 1

4:1

5

27.6

37

43.9

72

29.3

33

32.7

55

32

.68

7

31

.99

3

6/1

0/2

013 1

4:3

0

27.5

41

41.9

23

28.9

27

32.1

81

32

.61

8

26

.97

5

6/1

0/2

013 1

4:4

5

27.1

66

37.9

73

28.3

38

32.1

15

32

.45

8

24

.47

3

6/1

0/2

013 1

5:0

0

27.2

33

35.9

17

27.7

47

32.0

64

33

.04

3

25

.09

9

6/1

0/2

013 1

5:1

5

27.5

47

35.8

92

27.2

55

33.1

4

33

.39

3

26

.47

4

6/1

0/2

013 1

5:3

0

27.6

64

34.8

29

27.1

7

31.9

81

33

.57

7

23

.46

3

6/1

0/2

013 1

5:4

5

27.3

81

32.6

5

27.3

05

31.1

62

33

.38

9

21

.41

4

6/1

0/2

013 1

6:0

0

27.5

05

30.5

6

27.2

78

29.7

95

33

.48

4

20

.67

2

6/1

0/2

013 1

6:1

5

27.4

9

30.8

79

26.8

51

28.8

73

33

.4

20

.54

1

Page 130: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

116

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/1

0/2

013 1

6:3

0

27.5

36

29.6

44

26.3

87

28.9

29

33

.51

9

21

.92

7

6/1

0/2

013 1

6:4

5

27.5

17

26.3

92

26.2

35

29.0

82

33

.49

7

22

.44

7

6/1

0/2

013 1

7:0

0

27.7

73

25.2

22

26.0

79

30.3

22

33

.65

6

23

.17

5

6/1

0/2

013 1

7:1

5

28.0

64

26.7

17

25.8

2

29.1

13

33

.81

2

23

.90

5

6/1

0/2

013 1

7:3

0

28.0

79

28.4

81

25.4

82

29.4

41

33

.93

1

24

.65

2

6/1

0/2

013 1

7:4

5

28.4

02

29.5

16

25.4

68

28.8

86

34

.26

25

.63

9

6/1

0/2

013 1

8:0

0

28.5

87

31.6

57

25.6

66

30.0

84

34

.44

8

26

.52

1

6/1

0/2

013 1

8:1

5

29.1

17

33.1

19

26.0

06

29.8

68

34

.91

7

27

.44

5

6/1

0/2

013 1

8:3

0

29.2

72

34.2

4

26.3

19

29.2

57

35

.01

1

28

.29

6

6/1

0/2

013 1

8:4

5

29.3

64

35.3

18

26.7

08

29.8

23

35

.10

2

29

.08

3

6/1

0/2

013 1

9:0

0

29.6

22

36.1

83

27.1

3

30.8

73

35

.32

8

29

.86

1

6/1

0/2

013 1

9:1

5

29.7

82

37.0

19

27.5

46

30.8

89

35

.49

30

.50

4

6/1

0/2

013 1

9:3

0

30.2

11

37.7

96

27.8

84

32.5

36

35

.96

3

31

.04

9

6/1

0/2

013 1

9:4

5

30.6

03

38.5

37

28.1

53

33.5

5

36

.29

1

31

.66

1

6/1

0/2

013 2

0:0

0

30.9

95

39.2

07

28.4

93

34.0

87

36

.54

7

32

.17

3

6/1

0/2

013 2

0:1

5

31.1

15

39.7

76

28.9

78

34.4

79

36

.86

9

32

.61

5

6/1

0/2

013 2

0:3

0

31.5

69

40.2

08

29.3

16

35.3

56

37

.19

2

33

.19

6/1

0/2

013 2

0:4

5

32.0

59

40.8

5

29.8

68

35.8

94

37

.55

4

33

.50

2

6/1

0/2

013 2

1:0

0

32.4

14

41.2

91

30.2

43

36.0

9

37

.88

34

.08

4

6/1

0/2

013 2

1:1

5

32.8

04

41.8

65

30.5

13

36.3

93

38

.13

5

34

.56

3

6/1

0/2

013 2

1:3

0

33.1

95

42.2

72

30.7

44

36.7

49

38

.49

4

34

.97

9

Page 131: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

117

Tab

le C

(C

onti

nued

)

D

L01

D

L07

D

L09

D

L11

D

L1

5

DL

16

Date

%

%

%

%

%

%

6/1

0/2

013 2

1:4

5

33.6

49

42.8

16

31.1

14

37.8

3

38

.82

35

.42

9

6/1

0/2

013 2

2:0

0

34.1

05

42.9

28

31.5

18

38.3

25

39

.14

6

35

.37

8

6/1

0/2

013 2

2:1

5

34.4

25

43.3

7

31.8

86

38.5

08

39

.06

1

35

.39

5

6/1

0/2

013 2

2:3

0

34.6

12

43.3

78

32.7

78

38.9

74

39

.51

9

35

.60

9

6/1

0/2

013 2

2:4

5

35.0

64

43.7

21

33.2

5

39.9

35

39

.74

1

35

.89

2

6/1

0/2

013 2

3:0

0

35.4

51

44.0

64

33.6

55

40.2

56

39

.76

36

.07

7

6/1

0/2

013 2

3:1

5

35.5

68

44.3

41

34.2

32

40.3

44

39

.81

2

36

.32

8

6/1

0/2

013 2

3:3

0

35.8

88

44.5

53

34.4

67

41.7

17

39

.96

6

36

.90

9

6/1

0/2

013 2

3:4

5

36.3

07

45.0

98

34.8

02

43.6

93

40

.22

1

37

.09

6

Page 132: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

118

Page 133: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

119

APPENDIX D

TEMPERATURE DATA COMPARISON GRAPH FOR THREE HOTTEST DAY

(WITHOUT DL01)

Page 134: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

120

F

igur

e D

Tem

pera

ture

dat

a co

mpa

rison

gra

ph fo

r thr

ee h

otte

st da

ys (W

ithou

t DL0

1)

Page 135: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

121

APPENDIX E

HUMIDITY DATA COMPARISON GRAPH FOR THREE HOTTEST DAYS

(WITHOUT DL01)

Page 136: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL …etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12616210/index.pdfApproval of the Thesis: THE IMPACT OF DOUBLE SKIN FACADES ON THERMAL PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS

122

Figu

re E

Hum

idity

dat

a co

mpa

rison

gra

ph fo

r thr

ee h

otte

st d

ays (

With

out D

L01)