23
The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 [email protected] Niki Anderson +44 20 7677 6951 [email protected] Morgan Stanley does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.

The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 [email protected]@morganstanley.com

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

The Green Budget

Funding issues and debt management

January 2006

Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 [email protected]

Niki Anderson +44 20 7677 6951 [email protected]

Morgan Stanley does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the firm may have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision.

Page 2: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Overview:

Public sector net debt is likely to continue rising as a share of national income over the next few years, but empirical evidence suggests that this is unlikely in itself to trigger higher real interest rates.

Demand for long-dated assets by defined-benefit pension schemes is set to continue, but does not guarantee long term real interest rates will stay low.

The Debt Management Office would benefit from locking in low real rates of interest now. Higher issuance of long-dated debt, significantly in index linked form, could also support cost effective wider pension provision.

The proportion of debt outstanding in index-linked gilts has been broadly constant in recent years. But the DMO seems prepared to take a more flexible approach going forward.

The Government may need to explore new ways to raise funds as debt reaches the 40% of GDP limit.

Page 3: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Public sector net borrowing

30.634.737.038.536.435.838.8MS worse case

27.831.333.637.237.036.038.8MS central case

25.028.831.536.736.736.838.8Base case 1

22232631343738.8PBR

2010-11

2009-102008-92007-82006-72005-62004-5£ billion

(1) Base case refers to IFS estimates based on PBR economic forecasts

Source: IFS, Morgan Stanley Research estimates, HM Treasury

Page 4: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Public sector net debt

40.840.339.738.637.636.434.7MS worse case

40.139.839.438.637.636.434.7MS central case

39.639.539.238.637.636.534.7Base case1

38.238.238.237.937.436.534.7PBR

2010-112009-102008-92007-82006-72005-62004-5% of GDP

(1) Base case refers to IFS estimates based on PBR economic forecasts

Source: IFS, Morgan Stanley Research estimates, HM Treasury

Page 5: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Outlook for gross gilt issuance

565958727051Morgan Stanley worse case

535655707151Morgan Stanley central case

505353707152Base case1

474747646852DMO/PBR illustrative gilt sales

2010-112009-102008-92007-82006-72005-6£ billion

(1) Base case refers to IFS estimates based on PBR economic forecasts

Source: HM Treasury, IFS, Morgan Stanley Research

Page 6: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

How does gilt issuance affect yields?

The projections are based on an assumption of no change in tax rates and spending plans – so they exaggerate the likely scale of gilt issuance.

But more debt is likely.

The interesting question is whether increased issuance is likely to bring about a rise in yields.

Historical evidence suggests that this is unlikely.

Page 7: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Gilt issuance and yields

Source: Bank of England, Debt Management Office

Year Gross (Net) Issuance (£bn)

15-Year Nominal Yield

15-Year Real Yield

2000/01 10 (-9) 4.66% 2.06% 2001/02 14 (-4) 4.86% 2.37% 2002/03 26 (9) 4.71% 2.21% 2003/04 50 (29) 4.70% 2.04% 2004/05 50 (35) 4.74% 1.85% 2005/06 52 (38) 4.30% 1.53%

Page 8: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Change in debt to GDP ratios for G7 countries

Source: OECD

-30

-20

-10

0

10

20

30

Canada France Germany Italy Japan UnitedKingdom

UnitedStates

Deb

t to

GD

P r

atio

(%

)

Change in debt to GDP ratio 2000-05

Page 9: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

International real yields on inflation proof bonds

Source: Bloomberg

1

2

3

4

Jan-01 Oct-01 Jul-02 Apr-03 Jan-04 Oct-04 Jul-05

Rea

l yie

ld (

%)

3.875% TIPS 20293.4% OATi 20294.125% IG 2030

Page 10: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Long-term real interest rates on UK conventional debt

Source: Morgan Stanley Research

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

1700-1749

1750-1799

1800-1849

1850-1899

1900-1939

1960-1969

1970-1979

1980-1989

1990-1999

2000-2004

2005

%

Average Long Term Real Interest Rates

Long Term Average (1700-2005)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

1700-1749

1750-1799

1800-1849

1850-1899

1900-1939

1960-1969

1970-1979

1980-1989

1990-1999

2000-2004

2005

%

Average Long Term Real Interest Rates

Long Term Average (1700-2005)

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

1700-1749

1750-1799

1800-1849

1850-1899

1900-1939

1960-1969

1970-1979

1980-1989

1990-1999

2000-2004

2005

%

Average Long Term Real Interest Rates

Long Term Average (1700-2005)

Page 11: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Government debt and real interest rates

Source: Morgan Stanley Research estimates, ONS, OECD, Global Financial Data

0

50

100

150

200

250

1700 1738 1776 1814 1852 1890 1928 1966 2004

% o

f G

DP

-4

-2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Government debt to GDP ratio

Real interest rates (right-hand-axis)

%

Page 12: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

The sustainability of low interest rates: Whether or not low interest rates are sustainable is important for debt

management.

If today’s low levels of real interest rates on government debt are here to stay then it is not so clear that locking in borrowing costs by issuing long dated bonds is necessarily the best strategy.

But if the real cost of issuing debt is likely to be significantly higher than today in the next 10 years, then the cost of funding can be minimised by issuing long dated bonds now.

Page 13: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

The sustainability of low interest rates:

Global savings glut? Not big enough to explain large fall in interest rates

Page 14: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Global savings

Source: IMF World Economic Outlook database (September 2005)

15

17

19

21

23

25

27

70 72 74 76 78 80 82 84 86 88 90 92 94 96 98 00 02 04

Page 15: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

The sustainability of low interest rates:

Global savings glut? Not big enough to explain large fall in interest rates

Rise in risk aversion/lower GDP growth? Cannot account for fall in context of asset pricing model

Page 16: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

The sustainability of low interest rates: Global savings glut?

Not big enough to explain large fall in interest rates

Rise in risk aversion/lower GDP growth? Cannot account for fall in context of asset pricing model

Pension fund rebalancing? Most convincing explanation for current low levels But future impact on yields could be muted

Page 17: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Pension fund bond purchases versus gilt supply

Source: Morgan Stanley Research estimates

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060

Net bond buying as a proportion of giltsupply

Gilt supply assumes Morgan Stanley central case projections (Green Budget) until debt to GDP reaches 40% and then assumes debt is issued to keep debt at 40% GDP thereafter, with nominal GDP assumed to grow 4.5% a year

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060

Net bond buying as a proportion of giltsupply

Gilt supply assumes Morgan Stanley central case projections (Green Budget) until debt to GDP reaches 40% and then assumes debt is issued to keep debt at 40% GDP thereafter, with nominal GDP assumed to grow 4.5% a year

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 2055 2060

Net bond buying as a proportion of giltsupply

Gilt supply assumes Morgan Stanley central case projections (Green Budget) until debt to GDP reaches 40% and then assumes debt is issued to keep debt at 40% GDP thereafter, with nominal GDP assumed to grow 4.5% a year

Page 18: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Funding and funding strategy

Source: Debt Management Office

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06

Per

cent

age

of c

onve

ntio

nal g

ilt s

ales

Short

Medium

Long

Page 19: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Funding and funding strategy

Source: Debt Management Office

0%

25%

50%

75%

100%

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005Per

cent

age

of o

vera

ll de

bt p

ortf

olio

Conventional

Index-Linked

Page 20: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Funding and funding strategy

Strong case for significant funding from long-dated, substantially index-linked, debt. This case is strengthened if long-dated yields are temporarily beneath sustainable levels.

It is not that one can be sure that we are in the midst of a bond market bubble - there are some reasons to believe that sustainable real yields may have moved down.

But the scale of the fall in real yields is so great that the risks have now become asymmetric - the chances of real yields going higher from here are greater than their going lower. Locking in at today’s low real yields by issuing long dated indexed debt is therefore sensible.

Page 21: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Buying back company pension liabilities

David Willetts recently proposed that companies might be given the option of, effectively, selling to the government that part of their obligations to pay pensions to past and current employees that reflected the contracted out rebate. In principle the idea is simple, though in practice there are difficulties.

There would be an economic gain if the cost to the public sector of having the obligation to pay higher state second pensions in future were smaller than the cost to companies of holding the same obligations. That would be true if companies were less able to manage the risks of holding those obligations – longevity risks and risks of assets underperforming.

Page 22: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

Buying back company pension liabilities The issue of whether the government should buy some of these pension

obligations from companies is similar to the question of whether the government should issue longevity bonds.

But the government already has huge exposure to unanticipated rises in life expectancy. So it is far from clear that taking on more longevity risk is optimal.

Buying pension obligations from companies would, however, generate substantial cash. If those obligations were not treated as on a par with government debt, then the strategy would ease the constraint that the 40% net debt limit creates.

Page 23: The Green Budget Funding issues and debt management January 2006 Professor David Miles +44 20 7425 1820 david.miles@morganstanley.comdavid.miles@morganstanley.com

Please refer to important disclosures at the end of this presentation

DisclaimersOther Important Disclosures For a discussion, if applicable, of the valuation methods used to determine the price targets included in this summary and the risks related to achieving these targets, please refer to the latest relevant published research on these stocks. Research is available through your sales representative or on Client Link at www.morganstanley.com and other electronic systems.

This report does not provide individually tailored investment advice. It has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it. The securities discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Morgan Stanley recommends that investors independently evaluate particular investments and strategies, and encourages investors to seek the advice of a financial adviser. The appropriateness of a particular investment or strategy will depend on an investor’s individual circumstances and objectives.

This report is not an offer to buy or sell any security or to participate in any trading strategy. In addition to any holdings disclosed in the section entitled "Important US Regulatory Disclosures on Subject Companies", Morgan Stanley and/or its employees not involved in the preparation of this report may have investments in securities or derivatives of securities of companies mentioned in this report, and may trade them in ways different from those discussed in this report. Derivatives may be issued by Morgan Stanley or associated persons.

Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and its affiliate companies do business that relates to companies covered in its research reports, including market making and specialized trading, risk arbitrage and other proprietary trading, fund management, investment services and investment banking. Morgan Stanley sells to and buys from customers the equity securities of companies covered in its research reports on a principal basis.

Morgan Stanley makes every effort to use reliable, comprehensive information, but we make no representation that it is accurate or complete. We have no obligation to tell you when opinions or information in this report change apart from when we intend to discontinue research coverage of a subject company.

With the exception of information regarding Morgan Stanley, reports prepared by Morgan Stanley research personnel are based on public information. Facts and views presented in this report have not been reviewed by, and may not reflect information known to, professionals in other Morgan Stanley business areas, including investment banking personnel.

Morgan Stanley research personnel conduct site visits from time to time but are prohibited from accepting payment or reimbursement by the company of travel expenses for such visits.

The value of and income from your investments may vary because of changes in interest rates or foreign exchange rates, securities prices or market indexes, operational or financial conditions of companies or other factors. There may be time limitations on the exercise of options or other rights in your securities transactions. Past performance is not necessarily a guide to future performance. Estimates of future performance are based on assumptions that may not be realized.

This publication is disseminated in Japan by Morgan Stanley Japan Limited; in Hong Kong by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Asia Limited; in Singapore by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Asia (Singapore) Pte., regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore, which accepts responsibility for its contents; in Australia by Morgan Stanley Dean Witter Australia Limited A.B.N. 67 003 734 576, a licensed dealer, which accepts responsibility for its contents; in Canada by Morgan Stanley Canada Limited, which has approved of, and has agreed to take responsibility for, the contents of this publication in Canada; in Spain by Morgan Stanley, S.V., S.A., a Morgan Stanley group company, which is supervised by the Spanish Securities Markets Commission (CNMV) and states that this document has been written and distributed in accordance with the rules of conduct applicable to financial research as established under Spanish regulations; in the United States by Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated and Morgan Stanley DW Inc., which accept responsibility for its contents; and in the United Kingdom, this publication is approved by Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited, solely for the purposes of section 21 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 and is distributed in the European Union by Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited, except as provided above. Private U.K. investors should obtain the advice of their Morgan Stanley & Co. International Limited representative about the investments concerned. In Australia, this report, and any access to it, is intended only for “wholesale clients” within the meaning of the Australian Corporations Act.

The trademarks and service marks contained herein are the property of their respective owners. Third-party data providers make no warranties or representations of any kind relating to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the data they provide and shall not have liability for any damages of any kind relating to such data. The Global Industry Classification Standard ("GICS") was developed by and is the exclusive property of MSCI and S&P.

This report or any portion hereof may not be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the written consent of Morgan Stanley.

Morgan Stanley research is disseminated and available primarily electronically, and, in some cases, in printed form.

Additional information on recommended securities is available on request.