The Global Nationality

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/6/2019 The Global Nationality

    1/2

    1 The Global Nationality Ryan Robert Gutierrez-Flores

    The Global NationalityAn essay on Professor Horatio Muir-Watts Reshaping Private International Law in a Changing World

    There is a dire need for the establishment of standards, uniform to all states who wish to

    establish trade with each other. Conflict of Laws, as confusing as it may seem for the law

    student similarly offer little clarity to those whose industry, status or life depends on it because

    of the lack of a hard set of rules governing the exercise of municipal laws in questions involving

    the foreign element of an individual transaction or controversy.

    The re-orientation of how we perceive the problem of Conflicts of Law into how states,

    as vendors, offer different legal products to suit the needs of people who move back and forth

    through of the porous borders in a globalized world is necessary to keep up with the rapid

    modernization of the same. This is most evident in how multi-national corporations factor in

    legal risk analysis in the establishment of off-shore business units, sometimes relocating whole

    departments and SBUs to foreign countries which are governed by the laws that deliberately or

    accidentally favor the stateless, faceless corporation, at the expense of the local population.

    Professor Horatia Muir-Watt in her essay Reshaping Private International Law in a

    Changing World argues that there is a need for a central regulator to govern the relationships

    of these states in their dealings with each other. The author likewise cites as an example the

    environmental impact of a corporation, legally operating under lower standards of care in one

    state which spills over into another with a higher degree of concern for the environment should

    be held liable and must be subjected to the laws of the country with the stricter policy against the

    destructive activity.

    In the Philippine context, this is more than apparent. Until recently, India was the leading

    nation in the world of Business Process Outsourcing (BPO), the Philippines has since overtaken

    India on the basis of new business generated, which actually means more American, European

    and Australasian corporations opted to bring their business to the Philippines than to India. As a

    result of which, rapid development of corporate infrastructure has been responsible for the

    development of not only the capital city, but almost all major cities in the Philippines. This in

    itself, in terms of the nations macroeconomics, paints a rosy picture. However, in terms of

    actual, individual gain, a Filipino employee, working the same number of hours, under the same

    rules and restrictions imposed on their American counterparts are making 90% less money than

    had they been working on American soil, because of the imposition of local labor laws which set

    the minimum wage and benefits accorded to workers instead of the legal rate in the home

    country of the corporation.

    Raising the salaries of BPO employees to meet those of the home state of the corporation

    may serve to defeat the very purpose of the whole exercise, where corporations may then just

    establish their offices in their own jurisdictions since they will pay just as much for the same

  • 8/6/2019 The Global Nationality

    2/2

    2 The Global Nationality Ryan Robert Gutierrez-Flores

    service if their labor standards are used as the basis for compensation. It makes little business

    sense to go halfway around the world to spend the same amount of money, no matter how it

    makes perfect legal sense to do so. It is at this point that we have to make a distinction between

    locally registered corporations which offer BPO services, the multinational BPO corporation,

    and the foreign corporation who establishes a satellite office. The first category must be

    subject to local laws and labor standards as a corporation with a Filipino identity and

    nationality, while the latter two should be considered, as far as the law is concerned, as foreign

    corporations. In the case of the third category, the company merely builds an edifice, and

    performs tasks or participates in a market that is totally foreign; it is a tightly sealed box where

    all we provide is space. The second category is where it gets tricky: the employees of the second

    category, for all intents and purposes, are employees of the foreign corporation in all but location

    at any given time. They serve and affect the international market, not just the home country and

    the host country, rendering services in behalf of the foreign corporations they represent. Which

    law protects them?

    Professor Muir-Watt likewise raises a point regarding the individuals rights of self-

    determination. When a resident of a state possesses the status of a dual-citizen, which law

    between the two should govern? Should the person be allowed to choose which one? My

    opinion on the matter is that the law of the place of primary domicile should apply. But this

    poses a problem, especially to our fellow countrymen who pledged allegiance to the flag of

    whatever greener pasture they find themselves in, while waving a Philippine flag behind their

    backs. Citizenship laws should be regulated on a global scale to give some semblance of

    stability to an increasingly mobile world, instead of deciding on controversies arising from

    citizenship involving a foreign element on a municipal level.

    The point is conceded that the world is changing in more ways than one, faster than

    anyone has imagined it. With advancements in technology, making the world smaller and

    smaller as each year rolls around; states find themselves in the pull of global forces, pressing

    everyone to start reconsidering the old perceptions of a simpler time, and to come up with new

    and novel solutions to answer for the need of greater standardization and regulation in the face of

    new threats to its security. A balance must be struck between global capital, our requirement of

    it, and the integrity of the law with respect to its relationship with other legal systems and

    governments. A standard method or a global norm is necessary to maintain peace between the

    states and to harmonize their laws, without which, we face the future with uncertainty to the

    great detriment of all.

    Ryan Robert Gutierrez-Flores

    July 5, 2011

    Pasig City, Republic of the Philippines